SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      Mobile Version     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact
CapitolFax.com
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
Question of the day

Tuesday, Feb 28, 2006

Should the General Assembly impose a statewide ban on all cigarette smoking in public places? Why or why not?

- Posted by Rich Miller        


52 Comments
  1. - scoot - Tuesday, Feb 28, 06 @ 8:32 am:

    Yes, I think they should. It’s working in other states and it’s the healthy thing to do.


  2. - Stavros Popodopolis - Tuesday, Feb 28, 06 @ 8:34 am:

    No, cause then Rich Miller will be edgy and we can’t have that.


  3. - gopartisan - Tuesday, Feb 28, 06 @ 8:37 am:

    Absolutely! Then, the state should also double it’s cigarette tax and start spending the projected collections – which will, of course, not take into consideration the possibility that sales of a product whose use is simultaneously being restricted might decline.

    If it’s good enough for Cook County and Chicago, it’s good enough for the rest of the state, right?


  4. - Pat Hickey - Tuesday, Feb 28, 06 @ 8:50 am:

    Why the hell not? As long as I can get nice thick elephant steak and plateful of that there fois gras, why the hell not?


  5. - Skeeter - Tuesday, Feb 28, 06 @ 8:57 am:

    No. First, smoking effectively thins the herd. Given clear causation, it is a great way of getting rid of stupid people.

    However, we should pass a law allowing people to shove any cigarette butts, matches, or lightes left on the ground down the throat of any passing smoker.

    Do smokers not believe that these things are garbage? Do they believe that the State is obligated to clean up after them?


  6. - gopartisan - Tuesday, Feb 28, 06 @ 9:05 am:

    Wow skeeter, that is harsh condemnation of a group made up mostly of the working class with which your self-ascribed “progress” label would otherwise imply you sympathize.

    By the way, not every smoker is a litterbug my friend, and not every litterbug is a smoker. There is a lot of other garbage on the streets – whose throat can we shove it down?


  7. - ISU REP - Tuesday, Feb 28, 06 @ 9:12 am:

    Sure as long as they leave my precious cigars….They’ll have to pry them from my cold dead hands!!


  8. - zatoichi - Tuesday, Feb 28, 06 @ 9:21 am:

    Will it lower my health insurance bill? I don’t smoke, but how much of my payments are used to cost shift charges that are provided to smokers. Why not simply tax the hell out of cigarettes? How many smokers will keep smoking at $10 a pack?


  9. - Skeeter - Tuesday, Feb 28, 06 @ 9:28 am:

    In response to GOP:
    It is not harsh. It is a calm and measured response.
    Also, I stand by my statement: 100% of smokers are litterbugs.
    With regard to other trash: In my neighborhood, it is predominantly cigarette trash (and beer bottle caps, and I have a worse suggested fate for people who would toss those on my street).
    I am curious as to the thought process though: Do smokers really think the world is their ashtray?


  10. - gopartisan - Tuesday, Feb 28, 06 @ 9:46 am:

    Zatoichi –

    The cigarette tax revenue isn’t forwarded to your health insurance company. The county, state, and municipal governments that collected it spend it on anything but covering the societal costs of smoking. Change that, and you may have a valid argument. As it is now, the expenses they use those taxes to cover will not reduce if people stopped smoking - but the revenue stream certainly would. Not exactly sound public policy.


  11. - gopartisan - Tuesday, Feb 28, 06 @ 10:01 am:

    Skeeter, perhaps the idea of allowing people to shove any cigarette butts, matches, or lightes left on the ground down the throat of any passing smoker is a measured and calm response in Riyadh, but here in the US, we typically don’t allow roving bands of vigilantes to violently assault each other for littering – or any other crime for that matter.


  12. - Skeeter - Tuesday, Feb 28, 06 @ 10:10 am:

    Gopartisan:

    Have you ever tried to pry a lighter out of the mouth of a German Shepherd who is intent on trying to taste things he finds on the sidewalk?

    If you had, you would know that my plan is calm, reasonable, and measured.

    Plus, the law would put people on notice. Don’t want the butt jammed down your throat? Don’t toss it on the sidewalk. That’s reasonable, isn’t it?


  13. - ISU REP - Tuesday, Feb 28, 06 @ 10:18 am:

    I find screaming childern in restaurants a nuisance too, can we take care of that problem after we get rid of smoking? Have a child or a non child section, yet another reason why I should be in the General Assembly :)


  14. - gopartisan - Tuesday, Feb 28, 06 @ 10:31 am:

    Skeeter,

    You have a valid point about the very real and serious effects of such littering. I am a dog person too, and I think your passionate concern is admirable.

    I was not and am not saying that such littering isn’t bad. It is – undeniably. But the logic you use to justify your “solution” is just as undeniably dangerous: Don’t want your hand chopped off? Don’t shoplift.

    Forewarning potential offenders does not allow you to ignore the Constitutional ban on “cruel and unusual” punishment.


  15. - Darrell Democrat - Tuesday, Feb 28, 06 @ 10:35 am:

    It would be a good thing to ban smoking in all public places, but it would get watered down by exceptions for casinos, bars, and General Assembly offices. “Thinning the herd” is a harsh way of putting it, especially since the thinning takes decades of smoking to kill.
    How about using all the cigarette taxes (except the normal sales tax) and the tobacco settlement money for ACTUAL PREVENTION PROGRAMS?


  16. - Darrell Democrat - Tuesday, Feb 28, 06 @ 10:36 am:

    Off the topic, but how about being able to pour dog urine or stuff dog doo-doo down the throats of any passing pet owner?


  17. - Wumpus - Tuesday, Feb 28, 06 @ 10:46 am:

    Yes, ban smoking, then ban drinking of alcohol and soft drinks, then ban fast food and put us on sugar and salt rations. Following that, HB666 could mandate a 6am exercise time and 10pm bedtime, followed by coffee enemas for one and all.


  18. - Walking Wounded - Tuesday, Feb 28, 06 @ 10:52 am:

    ISU Rep…If you ran for the general assembly, you’d have my vote. I’m a rabid non-smoker, but if given the option, I would much prefer to sit in a hazy, smoke filled restaurant than sit in the screaming child section any day.
    Anyhow, depending what the description of “public places” involves, if that means eating establishments, bars, etc. then, no. The management should be responsible on making the decision to allow smoking. It would be up to each individual whether to patronize the place or not.


  19. - Skeeter - Tuesday, Feb 28, 06 @ 10:53 am:

    - Darrell Democrat - Tuesday, Feb 28, 06 @ 10:36 am said:

    “Off the topic, but how about being able to pour dog urine or stuff dog doo-doo down the throats of any passing pet owner?”

    I always clean up after my GSD, so there is never a solid waste issue. Urine is confined to trees and posts, which is much better than suburbanites who let their dogs do it in their back yards, and then allow their children to play in the yard. That is pretty gross to me.

    On that note, I was not aware that walking through dog urine caused cancer, but I can assure you that when a dog tries to eat cigarette waste, it can cause some major problems.

    With regard to Wumpus’s comments: When it is shown that my consumption of fast foods gives you cancer, then you can ban fast food, etc.
    This is not a health issue for the person choosing to consume it. Frankly, nobody cares. If you smoke and you get cancer that is your problem. I am more concerned about the innocent victims who inhale (or in the case of German Shepherds, eat) cigarette products.


  20. - BT - Tuesday, Feb 28, 06 @ 10:55 am:

    Yes, it will save lives.


  21. - Driver - Tuesday, Feb 28, 06 @ 10:56 am:

    BAND SMOKING…second hand smoke has caused my family far more grief down through the years than all the so called”assult weapons” that the guv wants to band.Why not make it a Felony to pocess a pack. That way the state can build more prisons, hire more guards, then rob their pension system some more….what a wonderful state this is.


  22. - Lovie's Leather - Tuesday, Feb 28, 06 @ 11:00 am:

    How about this… you let restauraunts, bars etc decide if they want smoking! A novel idea isn’t it? If people don’t want to go to a smoky bar, they don’t have to. But, some just have to diminish the rights of others. Screw public health… If we all wanted to be healthy, we wouldn’t eat fast food, we wouldn’t drink beer, and we would exercise more. Do we want the government to start saying we can’t have fast food, beer, and we have to exercise? No way! Then, why can they tell us that we can’t smoke? The government is wrong. We need to elect smokers into office… Judy and Rauschy… That would be a smokin’ team!


  23. - BackyardConservative - Tuesday, Feb 28, 06 @ 11:07 am:

    This just illustrates that all politics is local and local politics is the most impassioned.Might want to think twice about it.

    Vigilantism will be on the rise:)even in otherwise genteel communities:

    http://backyardconservative.blogspot.com/
    2006/02/neighborhood-outpost.html


  24. - gopartisan - Tuesday, Feb 28, 06 @ 11:07 am:

    Skeeter, Darrell Democrat’s point is certainly not without merit. Perhaps you clean up after your dog, but many do not. Perhaps many smokers litter, but many are courteous enough to discard their butts and spent lighters in garbage cans . Most cities have ordinances fining both dog owners who don’t clean up after their pets and anyone who engages in littering of any kind. Both should be enforced more strictly.

    Our country is founded on individual rights and responsibilities. If you are a responsible dog owner who wishes to walk your pet in an outdoor, public place, then you should be able to. If I wanted to take up smoking again and do so outdoors in public, I should be able to. As long as we are both responsible and pick up after ourselves, so to speak, why should either of our right to do so be restricted based on the irresponsible actions of someone else?


  25. - Louis G. Atsaves - Tuesday, Feb 28, 06 @ 11:12 am:

    Hey, just ban the sale of tobacco products. Worked like a charm for alcoholic beverages, right?

    I’m no fan of smoking and don’t mind limited smoking areas I can avoid (such as in restaurants) but this creeping nanny form of government has turned into a full gallop!

    Louis G. Atsaves


  26. - gopartisan - Tuesday, Feb 28, 06 @ 11:14 am:

    Of course, even if you did want to pass a sweeping ban on smoking, I still that allowing citizens to unilaterally penalize violators with a violent reprisal – even if advance warning was given – would not be considered a measured response.


  27. - Skeeter - Tuesday, Feb 28, 06 @ 11:31 am:

    In all seriousness, being from Chicago my perspective on this is interesting.
    Chicago does not allow indoor smoking in offices. That system works. Smokers can still go outside for their fix, and their cancer causing agents are diluted.

    When I go to offices outside Chicago, I am amazed when people light up inside. The non-smoker often does not have an option. You are forced to breath the cancer causing agent. I usually don’t have any real choice in the matter. As a practical matter, I cannot just leave the premises.

    Louis et al: Please note the original post. It referred to PUBLIC PLACES. It is not a suggestion of a complete ban.

    An indoor smoking ban is fair and reasonable because smoke causes cancer to those not choosing to smoke. Fast food only causes the consumer to get fat.

    As a final note: Would somebody please explain why cigarette smokers toss their trash on the street? It is a fact — nearly all smokers do that and it is really disgusting.


  28. - Coloradem - Tuesday, Feb 28, 06 @ 11:34 am:

    Hey Lovies,

    How about making driving while intoxicated legal also. I agree, screw public health and safety. A drunk driver is putting themselves and the motoring public at risk. A smoker in a resturant is putting themself and everyone else in the resturant at risk. So what? Life is full of risks!


  29. - Coloradem - Tuesday, Feb 28, 06 @ 11:37 am:

    One more thing, any other non-smokers on here irritated at all of the extra work “breaks” smokers seem to get because of their addiction?


  30. - DOWNSTATE - Tuesday, Feb 28, 06 @ 11:40 am:

    I smoked for years and I never knew what a pain in the ass I was to non-smokers.I can tell if a person is a smoker just by their smell.Not the best smell in the world.Lord how old age changes our perspective.


  31. - donchicago48 - Tuesday, Feb 28, 06 @ 11:51 am:

    Free markets cater to a variety of public desires - including the desire for smoking-allowed or smoke-free bars, restaurants, and public places. Consumers are free to vote with their feet should they find the policy adopted by an establishment objectionable. Government need only pass an ordinance requiring that all commercial places of public accommodation establish either a no-smoking or smoking-allowed policy, that those businesses prominently post the policy at entrances, and that the state or local government establish a means of enforcement as a part of existing inspection activities to ensure that businesses comply with their posted policies.


  32. - Coloradem - Tuesday, Feb 28, 06 @ 11:56 am:

    donchicago,

    Oh if only it were that simple. If I am an employee in one of these establishments that decides to promote smoking and I come down with lung cancer, is my employer responsible for my health care under workers’ compensation laws?


  33. - gopartisan - Tuesday, Feb 28, 06 @ 12:25 pm:

    Skeeter,

    I’m fine with an indoor smoking ban, depending on the definition of “public” place. A privately owned bar or restaurant is not a “public” place. Any place owned by someone else where you – despite perhaps having a right to – do not have a necessity to be in is not a public place.

    As far as the system of smokers simply going outside for their fix: Apparently, its doesn’t work. Your dog might eat their butts, and so we should pass a law allowing people to shove any cigarette butts, matches, or lighters left on the ground down the throat of any passing smoker (ie, the “measured” solution), right?


  34. - B Hicks - Tuesday, Feb 28, 06 @ 12:27 pm:

    Please, don’t! It will drive businesses out of Illinois. Businesses will pack up and move away with all the trucking companies. Hardworking families will move to states where they can sit in bars and restaurants that allow smoking.


  35. - Skeeter - Tuesday, Feb 28, 06 @ 12:29 pm:

    B Hicks said:

    “Please, don’t! It will drive businesses out of Illinois. Businesses will pack up and move away with all the trucking companies. Hardworking families will move to states where they can sit in bars and restaurants that allow smoking. ”

    So it is a double win?
    Not only do we get rid of the smoke, we get rid of the smokers! Illinois insurance rates will plummet.
    I sure hope you are right, Hicks.


  36. - Anonymous - Tuesday, Feb 28, 06 @ 12:34 pm:

    8:50 has it correct: Tons of fat and sodium are okay, yet they will absolutely shorten lifespans. Everybody knows it but nobody cares.

    10:35 has it correct: When the idiots in the legislature decide they need to play by the rules they create for everyone else, then maybe I’ll care. Until then, need a light, Emil?


  37. - B Hicks - Tuesday, Feb 28, 06 @ 12:53 pm:

    Careful, Skeet, Judy smokes. You don’t want the anointed one moving away.

    She’s so cute. I bet she’s really attractive with that Luck Strike hanging out of her mouth


  38. - donchicago48 - Tuesday, Feb 28, 06 @ 1:01 pm:

    Coloradem said:
    “…If I am an employee in one of these establishments that decides to promote smoking and I come down with lung cancer, is my employer responsible for my health care under workers’ compensation laws?”

    Good luck proving that the establishment “promoted smoking”, or that the employee’s cancer was caused by second-hand smoke, an issue fraught with contention by ‘experts’ on all sides.
    What would prevent an employee from “voting with their feet” and choosing a smoke-free job in the first place?


  39. - gopartisan - Tuesday, Feb 28, 06 @ 1:08 pm:

    Okay, in the great spirit of compromise that has sustained our nation for so many years:

    The GA can go ahead and pass a smoking ban in all public places. Heck, I’ll even give you the bars and restaurants, just for good measure.

    In exchange, they must either (a) repeal all the horribly regressive excise taxes on tobacco, and mandate that all counties and municipalities do the same (sales taxes would, of course, still apply), or (b) dedicate all revenues from said excise tax to cover expenses that would decrease with the rate of smoking: anti-tobacco campaigns in schools; public healthcare entitlement expense incurred by tobacco usage; heck, maybe even hire some unemployed and/or homeless people to pick up the butts so skeeter’s dog doesn’t eat them. You can even go ahead and raise the taxes if you want to encourage people to quit. It won’t matter if they do then, since the revenue loss will only impact programs that won’t be needed anymore.

    Then, when people’s property and income taxes have to be raised to make up the gaping budget shortfall such a re-appropriation of funds would create, maybe they will start paying attention to how much money their government(s) waste and stop tolerating the rampant (at the state level, both parties have been guilty of it) and blatant (in Cook Co. and Chicago, only one group to blame) corruption, patronage (blue and white collar) and pork-barreling.

    Sounds reasonable to me.


  40. - Darrell Democrat - Tuesday, Feb 28, 06 @ 2:35 pm:

    I like the idea of using cigarette tax money to hire people to clean butts off the street. And, hey, litter too while they’re there. Pretty soon, Illinois would look as clean as Disney World!
    All together now…”It’s a small world after all”


  41. - NIEVA - Tuesday, Feb 28, 06 @ 3:39 pm:

    A ban is a great idea!!! also wumpus are u giving the coffee enemas?


  42. - Lovie's Leather - Tuesday, Feb 28, 06 @ 4:00 pm:

    Yeah Coloradem, let’s not make drunk driving legal, let’s just make driving illegal. It kills so many people. Many pedestrians that have never driven get killed every year (second hand driving). So let’s just make everything that kills somebody illegal. We need to get rid of aspirin, and fatty foods, and life in general. Life is obviously inherently bad because it leads to death. May my sarcasm be noted.


  43. - Skeeter - Tuesday, Feb 28, 06 @ 4:08 pm:

    LL,
    I’m not clear on your post.
    Are you denying that all second hand smoke causes illness and potentially cancer to those exposed?

    Does all driving injure those who are around the vehicle?


  44. - gopartisan - Tuesday, Feb 28, 06 @ 4:14 pm:

    I know this wasn’t exactly LL’s point, but I’d rather inhale the exhaust of a burning cigarette than the exhaust of a running car anyday. How about you?


  45. - gopartisan - Tuesday, Feb 28, 06 @ 4:21 pm:

    And so would most Tollway workers and the employees at your local Jiffy Lube.


  46. - donchicago48 - Tuesday, Feb 28, 06 @ 4:28 pm:

    I can safely confirm, using empirical evidence, that “all second hand smoke” does not cause illness, unless you count the odd hangover from overindulgence in another popular vice.


  47. - Nearly Normal - Tuesday, Feb 28, 06 @ 5:15 pm:

    Illinois Senate approves letting counties ban smoking
    Last Updated 2/28/2006 2:39:30 PM

    County governments could ban smoking in public places under a plan that cleared half of the Illinois legislature today.

    Lawmakers gave cities the power to ban smoking in restaurants, bars and other public places last year. The Springfield City Council recently used that right to impose a ban that goes into effect this fall.

    Now supporters say counties should have the same right but only for unincorporated areas, so cities would still have the final say on bans within their borders.

    The state Senate voted 45-10 for the proposal.

    Some legislators questioned why county boards should have such power.

    Others said it was a good step forward but didn’t go far enough. They’re pushing for a statewide smoking ban but acknowledge it might not get approved this spring.

    “What we’re going to do is add more confusion … where people don’t know what the regulation is from one step to another,” said Sen. Terry Link, a Vernon Hills Democrat pushing the statewide ban.

    The measure now heads to the House.

    – Associated Press

    I have made two trips to Ireland–2003 and 2004. There is a nationwide smoking ban in public places that began in 2003. The pub owners had the same complaints that it would be bad for business. Now, they aren’t complaining. Seems the Irish like to get together and talk and drink their Guinness even in cleaner air. Also, the health dept. reports workers in pubs and restaurants reporting fewer missed days due to respiratory problems.

    Britain is also banning smoking in public places to take place in the next six months.


  48. - Beowulf - Tuesday, Feb 28, 06 @ 5:17 pm:

    I think it will do more to improve the health of Illinois citizens if we “Ban All Fat People From Public Places”. And, let’s take it a step farther so we can bail ourselves out of the miserable financial situation that George Ryan and Rod Blagojevich have put us in. Let’s charge every Illinois citizen (adults and children)$1 per pound for every pound that they are above their ideal bodyweight! This “Illinois Fat Tax” must be sent to Springfield on a monthly basis until these slobs lose the extra weight. Then watch our health insurance premiums come down, no more cops hanging around in the donut shops, the state budget will have a surplus of money for our Illinois politicians to find some stupid cause or program to waste it on, and there will be far more room to pass each other on the narrow sidewalks.

    No more stupid laws, please! Let people be accountable for their own actions. Let them smoke if they want lung cancer. Just make them accountable for their own hospital bills and don’t throw the burden for their stupidity on me and my children. No need to wear helmuts if you are on motorcycles. You don’t have to “buckle up for safety.” Do your own thing my friends but don’t be the deadbeats that you are by asking me to pickup the tab for your stupidity. They should enact laws down in Springfield that make people accountable for their own actions but we know that won’t happen because the politicians down in Springfield might be held accountable for their actions, God forbid.

    Everything that’s fun in life is dangerous. Horse races, for instance, are very dangerous. But attempt to design a safe horse and you have a cow (an appalling animal to watch at the races). And everything that isn’t fun is dangerous too. It is impossible to be alive and safe. “P.J. O’Rourke-Satirist”


  49. - Papa Legba - Tuesday, Feb 28, 06 @ 5:23 pm:

    Where to start? There are so many legal substances that can cause serious illnesses and death in humans. Acetaminophen will rot your liver faster than alcohol. Lets ban that too.

    Skeeter - I have noticed over that past few weeks you have been getting more and more nasty. What’s up? Need relief or sorts? Or are you upset that your untrainable dog can’t stop eating inedible crap it finds lying on the ground?


  50. - Skeeter - Tuesday, Feb 28, 06 @ 5:35 pm:

    PL: The issue is not about protecting the person who uses the substance. Smoke away. Most people really don’t care. The problem starts when you engage in an activity that doesn’t just hurt you, but hurts me also. That is the case with smoking. Somebody else’s choice to smoke hurts me.

    Regarding the GSD: Actually, the dog is highly trained. If you’ve worked with the dogs though, you would know that even highly trained dogs (like highly trained people) can have bad habits. Mine likes to eat things on the ground.

    Even if he didn’t, I would still be disgusted by it. I just do not understand this view of those who smoke who believe that they can just toss their garbage on the ground. For a non-smoker, it really is ugly. Educate me. Explain to me why smokers act in that manner.


  51. - Former MC - Tuesday, Feb 28, 06 @ 6:20 pm:

    Yes, ban smoking in public places. When personal vices, like loud music, public intoxication or smoking, infringe upon the rights of others, those vices should be curtailed in a public venue.

    That’s not the same as making smoking illegal. Let smokers smoke all they want in their private homes or in the outdoors.


  52. - Suburban Pulse - Tuesday, Feb 28, 06 @ 9:01 pm:

    NO WAY… let local governments do what they want


Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.


* $3 million in one pop from Rauner
* Reader comments closed for the weekend
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - State House fundraising report
* *** UPDATED x1 *** Has the haymaker punch arrived?
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - State Senate fundraising report
* Third straight poll shows Rauner leading Quinn
* Last call for tickets!
* Vast Majority of Illinois Voters Support Renewable Energy, Energy Efficiency
* Sun-Times reporters want you to sign their petition
* Same song, different century
* Question of the day
* Quinn finally wins a newspaper endorsement!
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today's cable TV buy report
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Supplement to today’s edition: Crosstabs, TV ads
* Report: Another tie between Rauner and CS-T chairman
* Bost's "anger," Cook's ratings, Foster's ad
* $580 MILLION EXELON RATE HIKE?? That’s the price tag for their nuke bailout…EVERY YEAR!
* *** UPDATED x1 *** Rauner pumping dollars
* Rauner pushing IDOT back into the news stream
* Gov. Quinn runs new TV ad featuring FLOTUS
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today's edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)
* No, your eyes didn't deceive you
* Good morning!
* Yesterday's blog posts

Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............


Search This Blog...

Search the 98th General Assembly By Bill Number
(example: HB0001)

Search the 98th General Assembly By Keyword

          
        * Galaxy Lollipop plans, Apple sapphire future, Amazon flops & more – Pocketnow Daily
        * Sidecar Tests A New “Commute” Service, With Discounts When You Pay For A Week Of Morning Rides
        * Sony 12-inch tablet may be in the works for early 2015 launch
        * Moto X (2014) Review
        * How to use Continuity in iOS 8 and Yosemite (Video)
        * Monster Strike arrives for North American Android users
        * Etsy releases Credit Card Reader for budding entrepreneurs

        * AT&T Offers Kindle Fire HDX Tablet For $49.99 With Fire Phone Purchase
        * NFC Chip Found In New iPads Could Be Used As Secure Element
        * Samsung NX1 Will Be Used To Film A Joseph Gordon-Levitt Short Film
        * 12-inch Sony Xperia Tablet Rumored For Q1 2015
        * Nest Adds Third-Party Home Automation Product Support
        * League Of Legends Pulls Close To $1 Billion In Revenue For 2014
        * Elon Musk Expresses Concern Over Artificial Intelligence

        * Konerko caps stellar career with Clemente Award
        * Konerko caps stellar career with Clemente Award
        * World Series Game 3: Notes and discussion
        * Rollins, Konerko named co-winners of Clemente Award
        * Alexei Ramirez and Adam Eaton Gold Glove finalists, but maybe not f...
        * Longtime scout Provas passes away after battle with cancer
        * Eaton, Ramirez named AL Gold Glove finalists


        Main Menu
        Home
        Illinois
        YouTube
        Pundit rankings
        Obama
        Subscriber Content
        Durbin
        Burris
        Blagojevich Trial
        Advertising
        Updated Posts
        Polls

        Archives
        October 2014
        September 2014
        August 2014
        July 2014
        June 2014
        May 2014
        April 2014
        March 2014
        February 2014
        January 2014
        December 2013
        November 2013
        October 2013
        September 2013
        August 2013
        July 2013
        June 2013
        May 2013
        April 2013
        March 2013
        February 2013
        January 2013
        December 2012
        November 2012
        October 2012
        September 2012
        August 2012
        July 2012
        June 2012
        May 2012
        April 2012
        March 2012
        February 2012
        January 2012
        December 2011
        November 2011
        October 2011
        September 2011
        August 2011
        July 2011
        June 2011
        May 2011
        April 2011
        March 2011
        February 2011
        January 2011
        December 2010
        November 2010
        October 2010
        September 2010
        August 2010
        July 2010
        June 2010
        May 2010
        April 2010
        March 2010
        February 2010
        January 2010
        December 2009
        November 2009
        October 2009
        September 2009
        August 2009
        July 2009
        June 2009
        May 2009
        April 2009
        March 2009
        February 2009
        January 2009
        December 2008
        November 2008
        October 2008
        September 2008
        August 2008
        July 2008
        June 2008
        May 2008
        April 2008
        March 2008
        February 2008
        January 2008
        December 2007
        November 2007
        October 2007
        September 2007
        August 2007
        July 2007
        June 2007
        May 2007
        April 2007
        March 2007
        February 2007
        January 2007
        December 2006
        November 2006
        October 2006
        September 2006
        August 2006
        July 2006
        June 2006
        May 2006
        April 2006
        March 2006
        February 2006
        January 2006
        December 2005
        April 2005
        March 2005
        February 2005
        January 2005
        December 2004
        November 2004
        October 2004

        Blog*Spot Archives
        November 2005
        October 2005
        September 2005
        August 2005
        July 2005
        June 2005
        May 2005

        Syndication

        RSS Feed 2.0
        Comments RSS 2.0
        WordPress

        Loading


        * IL Gov. Quinn Announces WIU-QC Expansion - KWQC 6..
        * CREATE partners celebrate Englewood Flyover's o.....
        * EPA grants land locally..
        * From the Capitol: Vote to shake up Springfield..
        * Candidates for governor focus on women voters w.....


        * US judge names monitor of IDOT hiring
        * Radio host convicted of alleged $10 million fraud
        * Illinois gov's race focuses on women voters
        * Judge rules against Ameren in power line dispute
        * Feminist Steinem endorses Illinois governor
        * Madigan, Rauner spend big on Illinois House races
        * Cockroach visits Chicago's City Council chambers
        * Chicago police to check bags on transit system
        * Toddler taken from family found in Illinois
        * Man, 2-year-old boy killed by truck in Bloomington

        * Feminist Gloria Steinem endorses Quinn for governor
        * Madigan, Rauner spend big on Illinois House races
        * Officials rethink early vote-counting after Madigan ruling
        * Minimum wage increase supporters urge early voting
        * Sun-Times political reporter resigns following Rauner complaint
        * Minimum wage hike supporters urge early voting
        * Federal judge orders court-appointed monitor for IDOT hiring
        * Rep. Raymond Poe to undergo stem cell transplant
        * Bill Clinton campaigns for Quinn, Durbin
        * Quinn, Rauner spar over jobs, taxes

        * Regulators close National Republic Bank of Chicago
        * Rauner, the reporter, the Sun-Times and 'appearance of impropriety'
        * Chicago police to check bags at CTA stations
        * Shire CEO Ornskov 'dumbfounded' by collapse of AbbVie deal
        * Tests show child in Chicago does not have Ebola


        * Editorial: Bruce Rauner for governor
        * Back to the past with mayor’s move
        * Illinois needs better way to deal with terminally ill inmates
        * At panel on school closings, board acknowledges more planning needed
        * Marina City residents reminded to watch their step during Wallenda’s walk
        * Republican senators question Quinn’s IDOT scandal response
        * Child who became ill on plane tests negative for Ebola
        * Tollway might permanently lower cost to open I-Pass account
        * Killer gets 27 years for throwing woman out 3rd-floor window
        * CPS wants to delay new standardized test, even though state already has said 'no'


        * FBI searches Chinatown restaurants, at least 3 owned by famed chef Tony Hu
        * Former radio host convicted of mortgage fraud
        * Des Plaines man who tried to hire killers to burn wife, friends alive gets 17 years
        * $5 million bond in vandalism of Lombard synagogue
        * Man charged with DUI in 2013 crash that killed woman, 78, in Aurora
        * Craft brewery on tap for Oak Park?
        * Police to screen CTA train passengers for explosives


        * Listen to State Week - October 24, 2014
        * 2014 Election Coverage: Citizens, here's your homework!
        * 2 dead, including gunman, in high school shooting
        * Prosecutors want more of indicted police commander’s 'bad acts' in court
        * Prosecutors want more of indicted police commander's 'bad acts' in court
        * Bedrock 66: Charlie Parr Plays Springfield Friday
        * Oberweis Would Back Federal Same Sex Marriage Law
        * Wild Bison Return To IL
        * Scary Story: The Diviner by Susan Vondrak
        * Artist Profile: Local Troubadour Tom Irwin


        * Feminist Gloria Steinem endorses Quinn for governor
        * Madigan, Rauner spend big on Illinois House races
        * Our Opinion: Bell, Manar, Davidsmeyer endorsed in state legislative races
        * Craig Burns: Honesty, integrity in great supply at CWLP
        * E.J. Dionne: Ebola, pandering and courage
        * Esther Cepeda: Benefits of closing the word gap
        * Officials rethink early vote-counting after Madigan ruling
        * Our Opinion: Frerichs has the expertise to be Illinois treasurer
        * Robert Kaestner: Good education policy is good health policy
        * Eugene Robinson: Warren makes the case for a presidential run


        * High school football scoreboard, Oct. 24, 2014
        * LIVE! Pink Night
        * Interfaith Council to host dinner
        * Webb sentenced to 14 years in fatal DUI
        * SportsTalk 10-24-14
        * SIC to host Heritage Festival
        * Fundraiser benefits Clothes for Kids initiative
        * Oakdale cemetery will have Underground Railroad tour Sunday
        * O'Toole to start Saturday
        * Film features past, present and future of Southern Illinois food system


        * Crystal Lake South wins boys soccer regional title
        * Konerko wins Clemente Award for work with foster kids
        * Facebook post gets heat from Elgin police
        * Girls tennis: Kawai, Linden continue in backdraw
        * DuPage forest preserve candidates differ over taxes

        * Patrick Cannon defense strategy rare but n...
        * Feds fine Jesse Jackson Jr.'s campaign com...
        * Ex-Congressman Jesse Jackson Jr. faces sen...
        * Representative Jan Schakowsky Sends Letter...
        * Rep. candidate pushes to uphold marriage b...
        * Reps. Schakowsky and Waxman Introduce Bill...
        * Statement by Representative Jan Schakowsky...
        * U.S. House Passes Resolution Condemning An...
        * FAA Rejects Call For New O'Hare Noise Stud...
        * Representatives Quigley, Duckworth, Schako...

        * Republican Senate candidate Oberweis favor......
        * Republican Senate candidate Oberweis favor......
        * Republican Senate candidate Oberweis favor......
        * Republican Senate candidate Oberweis favor......
        * Republican Senate candidate Oberweis favor......

        * U.S. Senator Mark Kirk to talk with Triton......

        * Bag Man In Redflex Bribery Scandal Will Plead Guilty
        * SportsMonday: Brandon Marshall Is Unacceptable
        * The Week In Chicago Rock
        * Durbin, Oberweis To Debate Tonight
        * First-Time Candidate Seeks GOP Incumbent's Defeat In 20th State House District
        * Mo Khan, Democratic Candidate For 20th District State Representative
        * The College Football Report: Area Police Top Poll
        * The Beachwood Radio Sports Hour #23: It's All Cutler's Fault
        * Durbin, Oberweis debate Tea Party, immigration, veterans, and gay marriage
        * Illinois judicial candidate encounters signature snafu when attempting to vote


        * Rauner rips Quinn on IDOT patronage oversight
        * Governor Quinn Announces Winners of 2014 Illinois Export Awards - State’s Trade Programs Help Companies Increase Global Sales
        * New Ad: Labor leader backs Rauner
        * Jewish Newspapers Endorse Rauner for Governor
        * Statement from the Illinois Department of Public Health and Chicago Ebola Resource Network




            Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller