LIVE session coverage...
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      Mobile Version     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact
CapitolFax.com
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
Filan fires back

Thursday, Aug 31, 2006

First we saw the Topinka budget plan. Then Budget Director John Filan lambasted it. Then Sen. Steve Rauschenberger slammed Filan’s criticism. And now we have Director Filan’s retort, done on his own time.

Thank you to Senator Rauschenberger for providing a little more information on Judy Baar Topinka’s spending and revenue proposals. But it still doesn’t add up. Taxpayers need to know how Topinka calculates her proposed revenues and cuts, rather than just taking her guesses at face value, and how much is she really going to invest in education and health care. Unfortunately, the Senator’s response still does not present a clear picture of either the details of Topinka’s proposals or of how the spending proposals and the revenue proposals, when put together add up to a balanced budget in each of the next four years. This stands in clear contrast to the Governor’s budgets, which have won national recognition in consecutive years for being clear and complete by Government Finance Officers Association.

More information helps citizens make an informed judgment about the competing priorities of the candidates, and it also exposes the real problems with Topinka’s budget analysis. Unfortunately, many of Senator Rauschenberger’s comments show the same flaws as Topinka’s plan. The comments, and the Plan, misleads taxpayers, relies on inflated revenues and unrealistic assumptions, and shows continued policy flip-flops.

1. Education

Misleading Taxpayers. If the Topinka budget plan assumes including teacher pension spending in its “education” spending, it is misleading. It provides school districts with an inaccurate estimate of how much they can expect to receive from the State, and claims money for education that actually will be used to pay interest on pension payments prior administrations failed to make. In addition, Topinka has said that she would spend more on schools than the Governor. To the extent that her plan would spend $8.2 billion and also pay for the pension costs of teachers, this is impossible. She should come clean about her spending plan – you can’t say that the same money is going to both pensions and schools, you can’t spend the same money twice.

2. Property Tax Reimbursement

Misleading Taxpayers. Topinka’s property tax proposal continues to mislead taxpayers and local governments. Despite the fact that Topinka claimed $2.4 billion in property tax relief, real tax relief based on historical property tax growth associated with schools from her proposal is only $1.8 billion over 2 years. Moreover, this spending binge will create a harsh hangover in 2010, as the first “unfrozen” school property tax bill will rise by an estimated $1.8 billion, which will be three times as much of an increase as the current property tax our taxpayers have been paying. As the Chicago Sun-Times noted yesterday, “her proposal is akin to pulling a drowning victim into a leaky boat: It merely prolongs the inevitable.” (See: Richards, Cindy “Neither school plan deserves an ‘A’” Chicago Sun-Times 8/30/2006)

3. Cutting Healthcare

Misleading Taxpayers. There is no reason why “Medicaid math” would work differently than ordinary arithmetic. Medicaid eligible individuals are real people who receive healthcare, and the State pays hospitals and doctors based upon the rates they charge, then gets reimbursed by the federal government. To cut these costs, you have to serve fewer people or reduce the rates that hospitals and doctors are paid, or both. Simple math. And if you do this math, you realize over four years 450,000 children, 275,000 parents, or 100,000 seniors could lose needed medical care.

Unrealistic Assumptions. The Topinka plan shows no detail on how these savings will be realistically achieved. But there is one reason that these cuts can’t occur immediately: moving to a block grant requires federal approval, and this takes time. This means that the cuts won’t be achievable in 2008, which means that actually the State would need to cut Medicaid spending by nearly $1 billion- with a B- each year to meet the Treasurer’s claimed targets. Because of federal reimbursement, described below, this means that actual services provided will have to be reduced by as much as $2 billion a year (a quarter of the size of the current Medicaid program). To achieve the savings Topinka claims, the plan also assumes no growth in healthcare costs while this approval process occurs.

Unlike the Topinka plan’s lofty assumptions, the only real solution to controlling healthcare cost increases is to implement realistic cost-controls, like prescription drug controls that are working now, and the primary care case management and disease management managed care initiatives that the Governor has implemented this year, leading to liability growth of 4.4%, significantly lower than historical averages, or what Topinka would have you believe. Republican Governors had 25 years to implement statewide managed care- we’re doing it after just 3 years.

4. Lost Federal Revenue

Senator Rauschenberger notes increased federal receipts from a block grant. The Topinka plan does not provide substantiation for this in its materials, and there is no basis to believe that total federal reimbursements would increase under a block grant. The Bush Administration has been trying for the past three years to significantly reduce State Medicaid funding, not increase it, including recently reducing funding for special education to Illinois schools. In fact, Topinka’s support of block grants (like the Medicaid Block Grant Program President Bush announced in 2003) will reduce federal revenues to the State significantly- which is the Bush Administration’s goal, less money for healthcare, not more. For an example of a non-partisan analysis of California’s attempt to move to a block grant, (See:
http://www.cbp.org/2004/0407medicalrestructure.pdf).

Misleads Taxpayers. Illinois receives 50% reimbursement from the Federal government for most medical services it pays for. Under a block grant, this federal reimbursement will disappear, and by making cuts, our reimbursement would also be reduced, by nearly $500 million a year. It is misleading to suggest that moving to a block grant will allow spending cuts that will offset this lost revenue, in fact such cuts would have to be twice as deep.

Unrealistic Assumptions. In addition, block grants do not allow for intergovernmental agreements or assessments, and the Topinka plan is proud to eliminate this revenue. The assumption that the federal government will replace these revenues is unrealistic. Eliminating transfers and assessments will cost the State and its healthcare providers in the following ways, with a total cost to Illinois (and its healthcare providers) of more than $1.3 billion. The Topinka proposal indicates that it will get rid of these revenues:

Cook County IGT- The State receives $317 million in 2007 from this transfer, and Cook County receives approximately $270 million from this transfer. The State and the County would have to find ways to make up for this lost revenue.

Hospital Assessment Tax - Illinois generates over $600 million from this assessment, of which Illinois Hospitals will receive almost $500 million, GRF receives $80 million, Illinois Nursing Homes receive $40 million and the Illinois developmentally disabled community receives $40 million.

University of Illinois IGT - The State and the University of Illinois share the $48 million that this transfer generates.

DD Assessment - Illinois developmentally disabled community receives an additional $40 million as a result of this assessment. Though GRF is not impacted by the assessment, this will leave a hole in community funding that GRF spending would need to be increased to replace.

Nursing Home Assessment - GRF receives $15 million and Illinois nursing homes receive an additional $30 million from this assessment.

5. Gaming

Flip-flop from Prior Position. Some of the details of Topinka’s gaming plan have only recently been received. While $1 billion in one-time revenues may be plausible given the massive expansion of gaming that Topinka proposes, Topinka provides no detail to support this assertion. More importantly, she provides no detail for recurring revenue assumptions either, and these assumptions seem to fail to take into account relatively obvious results of such an expansion. The Topinka plan would increase overall gaming positions in the state from just over 10,000 to 30,000, supposedly without expanding gaming, and assumes that this expansion will magically create more discretionary dollars to be spent on gambling, rather than competing with the current gambling that exists in the State, as well as, other businesses that rely on consumers discretionary dollars.

Inflated Revenues. When you increase the gaming opportunities in the State as much as Topinka has suggested, these opportunities begin to become counterproductive. That is, casinos are luring the same dollars statewide, and these dollars will begin to be split among facilities, rather than moved from other facilities. Some market share will be taken from Indiana and Wisconsin casinos, and as a result, we estimate based on studies by Deloitte Consulting, LLC and the Illinois Department of Revenue that about $600-700 million annually may be obtained from recurring revenues, about half the $1.25 billion annually that Topinka predicts. There is absolutely no empirical support for an additional $1.25 billion in revenue per year.

Unrealistic Assumptions. The Topinka budget also makes another misleading prediction in its four year plan. It assumes that new positions can be built immediately, and that the legal hurdles that have tied up the tenth riverboat license for years will be immediately surmounted and a new Chicago casino immediately constructed. As most of us know and as suggested in the discussion about capital above, it takes time to build additional space, we estimate very aggressively no less than 9 months for existing casinos and 18 months for the Chicago casino. This means that the full value of the gaming expansion won’t be available until 2010 or 2011- at the earliest. And this doesn’t even take into account the amount of time the 10th license will remain in limbo.

6. School Construction

Unrealistic Assumptions. As the Senator points out, debt service costs will mature at the same rate as the underlying capital spending. However, contrary to his assertions, school construction spending historically has occurred much more quickly than ordinary capital spending. This is also because Republican obstruction to a school capital bill has left our schools desperately in need of improvements, and these improvements need to begin in the next 18 months, not over a period of 5 years. Otherwise, the Topinka plan would unnecessarily delay the commencement of repairs critical to our children’s safety and ability to learn.

7. Pensions

Misleading the Taxpayer. The listed pension increase includes planned increases to POB debt service (at a rate which is consistent with the 1995 funding plan and is GRF funded), as well as increases in required contributions and includes all funds. However, Senator Rauschenberger is apparently unaware that 90% of our pension funding comes from the State’s general funds, and that over 95% of POB debt service does. A GRF value for FY08 is not $520 million, depending on employee payrolls, it will be over $600 million in FY08, and will rise similarly in FY09 and FY10. And, despite her claims, Topinka’s plan would not “fully fund” the pensions- it would only fund the pensions at the level proposed by the flawed Republican 1995 payment schedule, which underfunds the pensions each year until 2035.

8. New Hiring

Unrealistic Assumptions. The hiring of 400 correctional officers over 4 years is a departure from Topinka’s previously public support for the AFSCME proposal to increase correctional officers by 600 immediately and to increase statewide staffing (See: Chambers, Aaron “Union: Forensic shortage hinders evidence analysis” Rockford Register Star 3/28/2006). As AFSCME’s entire proposal was to increase statewide staffing by 2,000, rehiring was based on that calculation, and includes both salaries and related costs (pension, health insurance, social security, fringe benefits), raising average cost of employee to approximately $75,000 per employee (on average over four years)- the very number Topinka used in her August 17, 2006 budget cuts proposal. Her assumption that her budget can be based on a lower number is not credible in this context.

9. Pay Raises

Flip-Flop from Prior Position. “Treasurer Judy Baar Topinka, the Republican candidate for governor, got big cheers from the crowd when she said non-union workers should get the same raise as union employees. Then she tells the IAMG that merit comp employees deserve a raise” (Finke, Doug, “Statehouse Insider” Copley News Service, 5/14/2006).

10. Energy Plan

The estimate simply includes $45 annually as debt service in support of $500 million in capital spending Topinka has proposed in her energy plan, as well as $15 million in one time spending proposed in the energy plan.

11. “Pork”, “No-Bid Contracts” and Firing State Employees

Misleading Taxpayers. The Topinka Plan also attributes $200 million annually in savings to “reducing pork”, eliminating “no-bid” contracts, and getting rid of merit compensation employees. These “savings” were not included in the initial critique of the plan because they are misleading and even her plan shows that they will be unlikely to occur.

Flip-Flop: Pork- Although Topinka claims that she can save $100 million a year by eliminating “pork” from the budget, she does not state what this “pork” includes and cites only tiny examples of what she claims is $100 million a year. Instead, in her description of one-time spending, she promises to allocate funds to “pay-as-you go local projects”- in other words pork. Topinka can’t both promise to pay for pork and eliminate it at the same time- that is a flip-flop.

Flip-Flop: No Bid Contracts. Although Topinka claims that the State can save $75 million a year on eliminating “no-bid” contracts, the Treasurer’s office from 1995-2006 has a significantly higher rate of issuing contracts that were not competitively bid than the Governor’s Office. If Topinka had wished to end “no-bid” contracts, she could have started with her own office, especially with contracts awarded to her campaign contributors. The contracts that Topinka would reduce also affect core state services, such as vaccines for poor children and the ability to get service for Medicaid recipients at Children’s Memorial Hospital, once again a tiny portion of her $300 million claim.

Unrealistic Assumptions. Topinka’s estimate that it can save money by firing merit compensation employees hired over the last four years shows an inability to understand the business of governing and is yet one more unrealistic assumption to base savings on. The 350 employees that Topinka would fire (and not replace any) are in many cases long-term state employees who have changed agencies, or whose term has expired and has taken a non-term position. Firing all of these employees would leave a vacuum that other employees would have to fill, not unlike the vacuum created by George Ryan’s $3.5 billion ERI mistake of 2003.

12. Economic Development Plan

Unrealistic Assumptions. Topinka’s Economic Development Plan makes unrealistic assumptions, and like most other giveaways to large corporations, will actually cost the Illinois taxpayer money. There are already plentiful tax credits that provides hundreds of millions of subsidies to these industries. Though Topinka seems lately to intend for this plan to apply only to incremental manufacturing jobs (or in the case of the new jobs credit, all jobs), in any given year the average job growth is made up of a lot of new jobs and job losses. Unfortunately, Topinka’s plan would provide credits to the new jobs (and make these credits transferable, so even large corporations who outsourced jobs to India could take advantage of them), but not provide a counter measure to offset the lost jobs. This doesn’t make sense, and is estimated, depending on how the plan is structured (whether or not retaining current manufacturing jobs) to cost between an incremental $90-450 million per year, growing each of Topinka’s four years.

13. Elimination of Fund Transfers and Chargebacks

Flip-Flop from Prior Position. Topinka has previously opposed the administrative chargeback procedure and blocked it for over a year (See: Sweeny, Chuck “Topinka blames gov for ‘dysfunctional’ state” Rockford Register Star, 4/21/2006), but now Topinka has flip-flopped and appears to support it, though she has publicly claimed to end “fund raids”. The estimate provided for lost revenue in total is an average of four years of transfers from FY2004 through those anticipated in FY2007. After opposing this practice for four years, we welcome her support if she currently supports processing administrative chargebacks to special funds.

Misleading the Taxpayers. However, Topinka’s opposition to fund transfers is also misleading. Fund transfers are approved and determined by the General Assembly, and Topinka has had and will have no ability to prevent them, short of vetoing fund transfers authorized by the legislature and creating a deficit.

We have responded to the unrealistic and misleading numbers thrown together in the Topinka proposals. However, like the public, we have little or no information. Topinka needs to answer the question – “How did you determine your revenues and budget cuts? Are they real?” Even Topinka’s spending is misleading and needs clarity, especially her education spending. Claiming it doesn’t make it true. Her budget just doesn’t add up.

I would like to thank both campaigns for putting the effort into these highly detailed pieces. This electronic budget “debate” is unprecedented in Illinois. If either side feels the need to continue this, I’m completely open to more.

- Posted by Rich Miller        


39 Comments
  1. - Chick McGann - Thursday, Aug 31, 06 @ 11:44 am:

    Holy smokes. I took two naps and did the New York Times crossword puzzle during the time it took me to read the Filan Retort.


  2. - William - Thursday, Aug 31, 06 @ 11:53 am:

    Simplicity is truth’s most becoming garb. And I might add brevity.

    I initially wasn’t real impressed with Steve (Rauschenberger)’s response, but seeing how this from Filan drones on and on and on and on …

    I have to say that Steve made the better case.

    Thanks, Rich.


  3. - T.R. - Thursday, Aug 31, 06 @ 11:54 am:

    Cliff notes???


  4. - publius - Thursday, Aug 31, 06 @ 11:54 am:

    let’s just look at a tiny piece of this reply—managed care for medicaid recipients—the administration has decreased the size of the managed care program signicantly and now has aprogram called pccm’s —the program is a sham—it doesnt’ provide any means for doctors to actually manage care—puts no oversight or controls on specialist referrals or hospital stays—and simply gives doctors a management fee–and though the program supposedly requires things like 24 hour availability from physicians–the department is ignoring—or”delaying” those things which might make the program have some effect—most other states have real managed care programs which mandate coverage and do—to some extent — control rising costs.


  5. - Wumpus - Thursday, Aug 31, 06 @ 12:11 pm:

    Where is the “don’t pay the bills” portion of the Gov’s plan?

    Also, did Filan take another vacation day to rebut Steve’s rebuttal?


  6. - Troy News Guy - Thursday, Aug 31, 06 @ 12:11 pm:

    If he did this crap on his own time, he REALLY needs a hobby! The truth is NO ONE can tackle the public trough in Springfield (pork, nepotism, no-bid contracts, ad nauseum) until the average person (not just political junkies) gets involved, realizes the crap going on, gets fed up and registers to vote. Until then, Illinois is doomed to dorks fighting over the spigot. Get me out of here!


  7. - Anonymous - Thursday, Aug 31, 06 @ 12:13 pm:

    How did Filan do on his ethics test? He is saying NONE of this was done on state time, equipment or property? REALLY?


  8. - Tropy News Guy - Thursday, Aug 31, 06 @ 12:21 pm:

    Hey Illinois….thanks to you, our sick children are pushed to the back of the line at St. Louis hospitals. All our doctors went to Missouri, and now they can’t even get paid (more than 200 days since the last check!). I’m serious…. I gotta get out of here!


  9. - Louis G. Atsaves - Thursday, Aug 31, 06 @ 12:26 pm:

    I’m very impressed with both, although Filan tends to meander a bit. I got a little tired of the “misleading the taxpayers” or “”flip-flop” start to each section but I understand that he is being partisan at the moment as was Rauschenberger.

    Both are very intelligent men with differing viewpoints. The more fiscally responsible viewpoint that gives us the biggest bang for the buck seems to be coming from the Topinka camp right now.

    If you can continue to foster such debates Rich not only for Governor but other state offices even state senate and state representative, it would be GREAT!

    Keep up the good work!


  10. - Scoop - Thursday, Aug 31, 06 @ 12:29 pm:

    I think a debate between these two, on this site, will trump any debate we see on TV between Topinka and Blagojevich.

    Rich, will there be more “debates” like this? There should be, bravo.


  11. - Wumpus - Thursday, Aug 31, 06 @ 1:23 pm:

    If there were debates, the only viewers would be people who read this site and people who want to learn to do the Rasuchie. Fiscal debates, although critical, do not televise well.


  12. - Bubs - Thursday, Aug 31, 06 @ 1:27 pm:

    This was precisely what I thought it would be - long on tedious campaign invective and assignations, and short on details, or explanations of where he gets his numbers from.
    For example, what the heck do the Blago’s campaings false allegations of “flip flopping” have to do with budget numbers?

    Overall, a pretty weak, unprofessional effort from a sitting budget director. As usual, everything from the Blagovich Adminstration is on the curve. These guys couldn’t draw a straight line with a ruler.


  13. - Rich Miller - Thursday, Aug 31, 06 @ 1:44 pm:

    Actually, Bubs, I’ve read through it twice now and I think Director Filan made some very good points, most of which were based on facts rather than hyperbole. We’ll see what Rauschenberger has to say, if he chooses to respond, but I think Filan has the upper hand here.

    Of course, we haven’t yet turned the two analysts loose on the governor’s proposed spending/revenue plans.


  14. - Anon2 - Thursday, Aug 31, 06 @ 1:48 pm:

    I’m shocked. Filan could not find a single thing that was not misleading, a flip-flop, or based on unrealistic assumptions. Sounds like a credible reveiw and discussion of the issues to me.

    I hope the blog debate continues. Maybe Filan can be a bit more professional and articulate in the next go around.


  15. - Sound Reasoning - Thursday, Aug 31, 06 @ 2:01 pm:

    Rich, does the Governor have a plan yet? I thought he has refused to provide one until after the election.

    Maybe it’s easier to pick apart another’s plan than provide any reasonable alternative.


  16. - Rich Miller - Thursday, Aug 31, 06 @ 2:09 pm:

    Actually, “Sound Reasoning” I just sent an e-mail to Rauschenberger asking if he would pick apart what we know about the governor’s plan. I’m also looking at letting the two campaign go after each other on energy and the environment.


  17. - Yellow Dog Democrat - Thursday, Aug 31, 06 @ 2:13 pm:

    I agree with Bubs. When do we get to see the numbers that purportedly back up the govenor’s lottery proposal?


  18. - Jaded - Thursday, Aug 31, 06 @ 2:23 pm:

    I have to agree with Rich, that was a pretty good response by Filan however I would like him to answer his own last question. He wrote:

    “How did you determine your revenues and budget cuts? Are they real?” Even Topinka’s spending is misleading and needs clarity, especially her education spending. Claiming it doesn’t make it true. Her budget just doesn’t add up.”

    That is what people have been saying about your budgets for 4 years now. Claiming it does not make it true Mr. Filan (who know like a Governor who says he has balanced the budget when there was still a $3 billion deficit). I am glad that you finally realize this fact.


  19. - anon - Thursday, Aug 31, 06 @ 3:03 pm:

    I’m sorry - if Filans mouth is moving he’s lieing.

    I mean this is the same guy who said that the states budget was balanced this last year. “we took in more money that we spent” Hell, any one can say that when you only pay interest on all the money we’ve borrowed the last three years, don’t pay $2 BILLION worth of Medicaid bills, and skip a $1 BILLION pension payment.

    By the way, didn’t Filan use to write for some budget association he use to belong to until he got his pink slip?


  20. - Anonymous - Thursday, Aug 31, 06 @ 3:16 pm:

    Home Run by Mr. Filan. Nicely done.


  21. - Bubs - Thursday, Aug 31, 06 @ 3:44 pm:

    Rich, he’s the budget director and he won’t tell us where his numbers are coming from, even when Rauchy challenged him on them!

    I’m starting to think “FILAN” is a shorthand for “Frequently Is Loose About Numbers”, (and I certainly was temped to use a much stronger word in the middle.)


  22. - Downstater - Thursday, Aug 31, 06 @ 3:49 pm:

    Anon 3:16,
    Take off those rose colored glasses. Didn’t you get the memo that Illinois is dead last in the nation in debt liability. Filan can spin all he wants, but eventually this debt that Blago and company has incurred is going to have to be paid off.


  23. - bob white - Thursday, Aug 31, 06 @ 4:35 pm:

    I disagree with those who thought Filan’s response was strong. I thought it was vague and full of political answers that are besides the point.


  24. - Budget Watcher - Thursday, Aug 31, 06 @ 6:01 pm:

    Filan’s Medicaid “facts” are far from factual. There was no approved hospital assessment that generated over $600 million. Hospitals did not receive almost $500 million, there is no Developmenal Disabled assessment program worth $40 million, and GRF not not get $80 million. Liar is a pretty strong term, but he’s awfully close on these items.

    He also refuses to understand the reason for federal block grant funding, which is to replace the funding schemes that he claims will be lost under Topinka’s plan. Sometimes I think he’s purposely dense.


  25. - a friend - Thursday, Aug 31, 06 @ 8:40 pm:

    budget watcher…

    …you may need some new glasses. why don’t you ask the illinois hospital assn about the 500 mil they’re set to lose under topinka’s plan, or ask sen. schoenburg (who sponsored the hospital assessment bill) about the 80 mil the state stands to lose — don’t take filan’s word for it. get your facts straight for once, please.

    also, not a single state in the nation uses a block grant to fund their mediciad programs. I hardly think that 49 other states could all be so wrong…


  26. - Little Egypt - Thursday, Aug 31, 06 @ 8:57 pm:

    It was my pleasure to scroll past Filan’s crap and read just the bloggers. I agree though that this all could not have been done on his own personal time with his own personal computer.


  27. - Shallow Pharnyx - Thursday, Aug 31, 06 @ 9:01 pm:

    Rich,
    You do realize that Filan had GOMB doing his numbers research?? Who did Rauschenbergers?


  28. - Anonymous - Thursday, Aug 31, 06 @ 9:02 pm:

    No flip-flop by Topinka?! Good Lord. As Filan points out, Topinka wants to nearly triple the number of gaming positions, and build the biggest casino yet in Chicago. In the primary she specifically said she was against an expansion of gambling.

    Anyone still saying that’s not a flip-flop isn’t sane.


  29. - So Blue Democrat - Thursday, Aug 31, 06 @ 9:06 pm:

    Do you really think Filan wrote this response? No, it was probably want of his young workers in GOMB. If he really wrote it, I think he has too much time on his hands. He needs to worry about the crisis in state government.


  30. - zatoichi - Thursday, Aug 31, 06 @ 9:42 pm:

    Where in Filan’s response does he discuss how the State’s debt will be paid? He goes on about flip flops and faulty assumptions. This would have been a great place to describe how the State will move to 45th place on the national economic ladder.


  31. - Budget Watcher - Thursday, Aug 31, 06 @ 10:41 pm:

    To A friend,
    You can’t lose what you never had - there was no assessment for hospitals. None. Wasn’t approved by the feds in FY2006. No $500 million to hospitals, no $80 million to GRF, no $40 million to DD facilities, and no $60 million to nursing homes. Schoenberg sponsored the state bill authorizing the HFS to pursue an assessment, but the feds never approved it.

    The second point, and I’m typing slow so you can understand, is that a federal block grant would compensate for the foregone funding schemes like assessment taxes and intergovernmental agreements with Cook County and the University of Illinois.


  32. - Budget Watcher - Thursday, Aug 31, 06 @ 10:51 pm:

    One last point to a friend. The Comptroller’s website can tell you whether hospitals got their money. The fund number is 346, the agency code 478, the division code 65 - submit the query and tell me why there’s $1.218 billion in unexpended appropriations for FY06. The answer is because the assessment didn’t happen. Check your own facts next time.


  33. - a friend - Thursday, Aug 31, 06 @ 11:50 pm:

    budget watcher…

    the assessment didn’t happen? that’s funny considering that every major media outlet reported on the fact that the feds appproved the assessment, not to mention the fact that the hospitals paid the tax needed to generate proceeds off the assessment and then they and the state received the very federal funds that you claim don’t exist. I wonder what that extra 80 million supplemental bill passed by the general assembly was for? you obviously have no idea what you are talking about.


  34. - a friend - Friday, Sep 1, 06 @ 12:06 am:

    budget watcher…

    just one more note if you will about block grants. perhaps you didn’t take the time to read my previous comments, so i’ll return the favor and write slowly here for you as well…not a single state in the nation has adopted a block grant program for medicaid. perhaps you know something that all other 49 governors and general assemblies don’t? perhaps you need to spread the block grant gospel to a wider audience because no one seems to hae gotten your memo. call me crazy, but I think you and topinka are in the minority here.


  35. - Budget Watcher - Friday, Sep 1, 06 @ 12:23 am:

    A friend,
    Assessments happened in FY05 but not in FY 06. It was a one year deal. One of us knows the facts. Again, if you don’t believe me, call HFS tomorrow.

    Also, block grant funding will obviously require a federal waiver. Illinois, more than any other state in the union, relies on funding schemes like assessments and intergorvernmental agreements. This makes Illinois reliant upon an inefficiency fee-for-service healthcare delivery model. The General Assembly commissioned a report two years ago by the Lewin Group that backs this up. Block grant funding circumvents this reliance upon funding schemes and would allow HMOs to manage care. The Illinois Hospital Association will hate the idea, so expect them to be critical.


  36. - Shallow Pharnyx - Friday, Sep 1, 06 @ 7:56 am:

    Rich,
    Will you be leaving this up over the holiday weekend? Please do.


  37. - Shallow Pharnyx - Friday, Sep 1, 06 @ 8:14 am:

    A friend? A friend of whom?- Blago? “also, not a single state in the nation uses a block grant to fund their mediciad programs. I hardly think that 49 other states could all be so wrong…” We LIKE being in last place. 49 other states can’t keep up with our lack of pension funding.


  38. - Raoul Descender - Friday, Sep 1, 06 @ 9:15 am:

    Why do we need to have a shaman tell the tale of the numbers? Instead, the state and Mr. Filan’s department especially, should produce financial statements and financial projections that are comprehensive and comprehensible. The complexity and tardiness of the state’s financial reports obscure the state’s real fiscal condition, a tactic that should be a outlawed.


  39. - a friend - Friday, Sep 1, 06 @ 4:28 pm:

    budget watcher…

    i’ll go at this with you one more time.

    obviously I’m talking about 05 since everyone knows the the feds are still reviewing the 06 assessment. from reading the response prepared by filan, he seems to acknolwedge that as well. with hastert and the illinois hospital assn gunning for this, illinois is well positioned to get this approved for 06 (and remember, the hospital assessment is a five year arrangement, but still needs fed approval each of those years). as for block grants, the fee for service system you criticize allows the state to capture far more federal match than a block grant ever would. since the state is entitled to reimburse providers for any and all medicaid services, should the block grant run out we taxpayers are stuck paying the difference. so that means we either cut money from other programs, raise taxes, reduce rates to providers or throw people off healthcare. I don’t think most people are ok with any of these sceanrios. as costs for heathcare increase (prescription drugs, medicial services, admin, etc), the fee for service model guarantees that the state receive at least 50 percent back on every dollar they spend. a block grant has zero flexibility for this and states are stuck with whatever congress decides to give us. again, block grants are bad for states and that’s why not a one has adopted them.

    shallow pharnyx…
    shame on me for saying anything that might remotely seem supportive of this administration. I’m sure you have no biases, of course. with that said, yes, illinois does have the worst funded pensions, but that’s been the case for several years and you may not like accepting the facts (since you seem far more comfortable with empty rhetoric), but it was the republicans and that created this mess over the last 20 years or so. and, the pensions were worse off, dare I day it, before blago. you may not like to hear that, but the truth is often hard to take.


Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.


* Oops!
* "The safety net continues to crumble around us"
* "Picking the pockets of poor people" and stiffing the wrongfully convicted
* Radogno rips into the Democratic leaders
* Cullerton says he offered "practical way forward"
* Republican legislators want Rauner, AFSCME to restart talks
* *** UPDATED x1 *** Two non-scandals and a potentially serious one
* Rauner budget director to brief reporters at noon
* Rauner expected to veto police and fire pension bill on Memorial Day
* "I have zero confidence that Springfield will get its act together"
* *** UPDATED x2 - Rauner audio *** Rauner to comment on collapse of negotiations
* Unclear on the history
* *** UPDATED x2 - Madigan: "No hostage-taking" - Talks collapse as Dems pull the plug *** Madigan likely to speak after leaders meeting
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Supplement to today’s edition
* *** LIVE *** Session Coverage
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today's edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)
* Yesterday's blog posts

Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............


Search This Blog...

Search the 98th General Assembly By Bill Number
(example: HB0001)

Search the 98th General Assembly By Keyword

  
* Copyright questions remain after Google’s fair use victory
* Talk Android Podcast: Episode 8
* Skillz snags Chief Product Officer Bill Mooney from EA Mobile
* MacRumors Giveaway: Win a Bundle of 'Eve' HomeKit Products From Elgato
* [Deal] Purchase an Honor 5X for 20% off at Newegg
* Samsung’s S Health is now keeping score with your friends
* Google says VR fans should hold their upgrade till the fall

* White Sox MLB draft 2016 possibilities: Braxton Garrett
* White Sox face Moustakas-less Royals, this weekend and beyond
* Anderson among top prospect performers Thursday
* Despite struggles, White Sox upbeat, supportive
* White Sox opener vs. Royals postponed
* Weather postpones White Sox-Royals game
* The White Sox use up their cushion, so now what?

...............


Main Menu
Home
Illinois
YouTube
Pundit rankings
Obama
Subscriber Content
Durbin
Burris
Blagojevich Trial
Advertising
Updated Posts
Polls

Archives
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005

Syndication

RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0
WordPress

Loading


* Illinois state politicians still waiting on pay.....
* Illinois budget negotiations appear to be going.....
* GOP Attack Ads Target House Dems Who Voted for .....
* Republicans say Dem leaders have 'pulled the pl.....
* The Latest: Budget chief warns - San Antonio Ex.....
* The Latest: Budget chief warns - Belleville New.....
* Rauner's budget chief warns of 'devastating' co.....
* The Latest: Budget chief warns - Houston Chronicle..
* Radogno rips into the Democratic leaders - The .....
* The Latest: Budget chief warns - WREX-TV..


* NBC's 'Red Nose Day Special' raises $30M for kids' charities
* Judge OKs copyright settlement over Vivian Maier photos
* Fatal carjacking suspect killed near St. Louis is identified
* Activist sues over denied deferred deportation renewal
* Runner dies after collapsing during 3.5-mile Chicago race
* Former Pinckneyville bookkeeper sentenced in fraud case
* Man guilty of buying Indiana guns, selling them in Chicago
* Illinois lawmakers OK lawyers for juvenile murder suspects
* $11.2B Illinois road plan focuses on maintenance and repair
* Chicago police head wrestling with discipline for officer

* Republicans: Democrats have 'pulled the plug' on turnaround agenda talks
* Rauner, Illinois legislative leaders to meet Friday
* IDOT devoting $15M to roads and bridges in Sangamon County
* State budget battle rages on as clock ticks down
* First bird testing positive for West Nile in 2016 found in east-central Illinois
* Rauner, Democrats keep fighting over budget as time runs out
* Ray LaHood at prayer breakfast: Virtues of ordinary people make country great
* Chicago Schools CEO to lead Statehouse rally over funding
* Chicago Schools CEO leads Statehouse rally over education funding
* House Democrats defy governor, pass own budget; Rauner administration vows veto

* Motorola-linked credit union branches out
* Chicago's airport security lines appear to speed up
* Your trip through airport security today might not be as horrific as you thought
* Runner dies during J.P. Morgan Corporate Challenge
* Lawyer group forms for craft brewers


* Feds: man with pipe bombs wrote of plans to kill
* Man grazed in Brighton Park shooting
* Musician, West Side activist Boyse Edwards dead at 64
* Man charged with DUI for fatal Volo crash turns himself in
* Nobody should have to pay to clear record of a false crime charge
* Man charged with Buena Park burglary
* Republicans say Dem leaders have ‘pulled the plug’ on budget
* City to release 100 videos of cop shootings and more next week
* City to release 100 recordings of cop shootings, more next week
* At end of day, Sanders’ fans crazy not to work for Clinton


* 'Race card' played in fight over Lucas Museum?
* Chicago beaches open Friday for the summer
* Restaurants get hip to the importance of sound
* Amber Heard files for domestic violence restraining order against Johnny Depp
* Wauconda man arrested in May 5 death of pedestrian in Volo
* Rauner, Madigan point fingers of blame as lawmakers prepare to head home for a day
* 'Walking Man' loses some privacy as a result of beating
* Parents call for removal of plaques honoring former Lincoln-Way superintendent
* Cubs start 10-game homestand Friday against Phillies
* Documentary explains how Lake Michigan became an aircraft graveyard during World War II


* Republicans: Democrats have 'pulled the plug' on turnaround agenda talks
* Rauner, Illinois legislative leaders to meet Friday
* IDOT devoting $15M to roads and bridges in Sangamon County
* State budget battle rages on as clock ticks down
* Our View: Stubbornness, drama impede any progress at Statehouse
* First bird testing positive for West Nile in 2016 found in east-central Illinois
* Rauner, Democrats keep fighting over budget as time runs out
* Ray LaHood at prayer breakfast: Virtues of ordinary people make country great
* Chicago Schools CEO to lead Statehouse rally over funding
* Chicago Schools CEO leads Statehouse rally over education funding


* Tom's #Mailbag, May 27, 2016
* 05-27-16 John Reed, Publisher @News_Gazette
* 05-27-16 Penny for Your Thoughts
* Dick Van Dyke returning to Danville
* Gale pleads in Champaign County cases
* Street closures listing
* Third body in Danville case identified
* Activist sues over denied deferred deportation renewal
* Rauner, Illinois legislative leaders to meet Friday
* Judge OKs copyright settlement over Vivian Maier photos


* 2 more bison expected to come to Elgin's Lords Park Zoo
* Clash between Madigan, Rauner puts budget compromise in doubt
* Soft lockdown at Woodland Intermediate School
* Lombard driver services facility temporarily closed
* Dawn Patrol: Fight to fund schools in Springfield; Elgin city manager leaving

* House lawmakers overcome hurdle on key tra...
* Rodney Davis talks funding with Bloomingto...
* The agency that fought Illiana gets a new ...
* Rep. Dold takes educational cruise down Ch...
* Lawmakers decry high turnover rate of VA h...
* CBD Oil, and politics
* Simon considering state Senate bid
* Killer Congressman Tom MacArthur trying to...
* Shutdown? State may not notice
* Rep. Bob Dold

* TSA changes announced to decrease travel t......
* Rep. Tammy Duckworth Working with Senator ......

* Defence sales: US Senate may vote to bring......
* Equality Activists Ask HRC To Reverse Endo......
* Mark Kirk offers amendment to defense bill......

* Bike The Drive Happens On Sunday Morning
* UPDATE x2: Four IL GOP U.S. House members support banning "sexual orientation" discrimination
* UPDATE x3: Four IL GOP U.S. House members support banning "sexual orientation" discrimination
* Bill making it easier for non-citizens to run for student trustee goes to Governor
* Madigan: "It happened because I said so."
* Rauner BFF.
* Four IL GOP U.S. House members support banning "sexual orientation" discrimination
* Teachers (Ted Sizer).
* University of Illinois, SEIU push financially-strapped Illinois to provide state aid for non-citizen students
* Berg: Madigan's Rules -- How One Man Controls Illinois


* Emergency Management Officials, National Weather Service Encourage Winter Preparedness - November is Winter Weather Preparedness Month in Illinois
* Keep Your Family Safe This Winter - November through February are leading months for carbon monoxide related incidents
* Governor Takes Bill Action
* Illinois Department of Labor Director Hugo Chaviano Awards Governor’s Award for Contributions in Health and Safety to the Illinois Refining Division of Marathon Petroleum Company LP
* State Regulator Elected Treasurer of Interstate Medical Licensure Compact




Hosted by MCS -- CapitolFax.com Privacy Policy -- SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax -- Advertise Here -- Mobile Version -- Contact Rich Miller