SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      Mobile Version     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact
CapitolFax.com
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
Did Change Illinois really just, um, change Illinois?

Friday, Oct 30, 2009

* Bethany Jaeger at Illinois Issues breaks down the new campaign finance reform bill

* Require candidates to report contributions and expenditures four times a year, as opposed to the current twice a year. Donations of $1,000 or more would have to be reported within two business days throughout the entire year.
* Allow the Illinois State Board of Elections to conduct random audits, to investigate alleged violations of contribution limits or reporting requirements and to waive fees if the mistakes were found to be inadvertent.
* Form a task force to study the effectiveness of the implementation of the new law, as well as the public funding of political campaigns.

Per election cycle limits
Individuals can give up to:

* $5,000 to any candidate
* $10,000 to any political party or legislative caucus committee
* $10,000 to any political action committee

Businesses, unions and associations can give up to:

* $10,000 to any candidate
* $20,000 to any political party or legislative caucus committee
* $20,000 to any political action committee

Candidates can give up to:

* $50,000 to any candidate
* $50,000 to any political action committee
* Unlimited contributions to any political party or legislative caucus committee, except a $50,000 limit to a committee participating in primary elections

Political party and legislative caucus committees during primary elections:
The aggregate amount between state, county, township and city political committees cannot exceed:

* $200,000 to statewide candidates
* $125,000 to any state Senate candidate
* $75,000 to any state House candidate
* Between $50,000 - $125,000 to candidates for local and judicial offices
* $20,000 to political action committees
* Unlimited contributions to candidates during general elections

The legislation itself can be accessed by clicking here.

* The Tribune editorial board rails against the compromise

Putting its best face forward, the coalition of government watchdogs that signed off on Phony Campaign Finance Fix 2.0 said the deal struck Thursday with Democratic legislators “puts Illinois on the road to reform.” […]

The watchdogs can lay claim to the state’s first-ever caps on campaign contributions, but they swallowed a bitter compromise: The bill would limit how much individuals, corporations, unions and political action committees can contribute to a campaign. But contributions from party leaders would be capped only in primary elections.

That imbalance does more harm than good. It doesn’t curb the influence of money; it gives even greater influence to party leaders, who already tell your elected officials how to drive.

As does the Sun-Times...

The governor, House Speaker Mike Madigan and Senate President John Cullerton need to carry the ball a little farther.

Or call it quits and go home.

And face the wrath of the voters.

* John Patterson of the Daily Herald has the justification from Cindi Canary, whose group is part of the Change Illinois coalition…

“At the end of the day I don’t think it was ever about getting a perfect bill,” Canary told reporters at the Capitol.

Reformers feared if they continued a hard-line approach nothing would happen and they’d get blamed for killing off the numerous agreed-upon reforms.

“There was a sense that they wanted to gain the improvements - and make sure they left the building with something,” Canary said of why members of the Change Illinois! group compromised.

He also has strong reaction from GOP state Rep. Suzie Bassi…

“Change Illinois! was either worn down or bought out,” she said on the House floor

* More back and forth

“This will create omnipotent leaders, caucus leaders and party bosses in the state of Illinois,” said Rep. Michael Tryon, R-Crystal Lake. “I think that’s what Illinoisans are trying to get away from.”

The legislation also creates stricter reporting requirements for campaign contributions and expenditures. Disclosure reports would have to be filed four times a year, and contributions of $1,000 or more would have to be quickly reported to the State Board of Elections.

Kent Redfield, a campaign finance expert and retired University of Illinois Springfield professor, said the new disclosure rules might be the toughest in the country.

More

House Republican leader Tom Cross of Oswego contended the campaign finance proposal fell short of scaling back the power of legislative leaders and political parties because the bill also should impose limits in the general election.

“This is the only way to enact change, this is the only way to reduce the power, this is the only way to reduce the control,” Cross said, saying the “status quo remains the same.”

Madigan defended the decision to exempt legislative and party leaders from donation limits in general elections. Along with Supreme Court rulings that make it difficult to limit funding, Madigan said, the general election is an all-out battle between political parties.

“My view is a political party exists to support its candidates in the general election,” Madigan said.

* And in case you missed these last night, here are some videos. First up, Speaker Madigan


* Cindi Canary


- Posted by Rich Miller        


41 Comments
  1. - Plutocrat03 - Friday, Oct 30, 09 @ 9:41 am:

    Its like asking a bank robber to consult on a security system. There will be hole for them to exploit everywhere.

    The result is disappointing, but not unexpected.


  2. - Montrose - Friday, Oct 30, 09 @ 9:46 am:

    Of course it is not a perfect bill. When was the last time a perfect bill came out of Springfield? 99.44% of legislative change is incremental. Bills with much lower stakes are watered down all the time. Why would this issue be any different?

    I think the editorial boards are being overly critical of Change Illinois. They saw a deal that got them further down the road and took it. Everyone who has spent more than 15 minutes in Springfield has had to do the same thing with their issue.

    Everyone needs to take a deep breath and think of this as a step in the process, not the end.


  3. - this old hack - Friday, Oct 30, 09 @ 9:55 am:

    I would like to know, from the Sun-Times and the Tribune Mr. Collins exactly how their proposals, if enacted exactly as recommended, would have stopped Gov. Ryan and Gov. Blagojevich’s corruption? Or even Cindy, seeing as she has become the anointed “expert” on all of this.

    Lets recap Kent Redfield’s comments, the authentic expert on state campaign finance, from the story:

    “Kent Redfield, a campaign finance expert and retired University of Illinois Springfield professor, said the new disclosure rules might be the toughest in the country.”

    I rest my case.


  4. - Dirt Digger - Friday, Oct 30, 09 @ 10:01 am:

    It’s a fine bill. The caps are reasonable and the consolidation of candidate/ward committees as well as quarterly reports/48 hour late disclosure are very good.


  5. - Anonymous45 - Friday, Oct 30, 09 @ 10:05 am:

    It’s a decent start…reform will come incrementally…


  6. - Bon Voyage, Bethany! - Friday, Oct 30, 09 @ 10:07 am:

    I’m off-topic, but I’ll miss Bethany’s reporting when she moves on. She has a knack for breaking big bills down into bite-sized pieces. Thanks to her for being clear, concise, and insightful.


  7. - MKK - Friday, Oct 30, 09 @ 10:09 am:

    Can anyone seriously think that if Change Illinois had walked away this bill would have failed? They did not have to capitulate and could have held their head high with what they liked in the bill. Instead they sold out the voters without lots of bucks and made sure that those with bucks will now pay the leaders to get the votes they want.
    In the end, the leadership won, lock, stock and barrell and the reform groups lost the battle, the war and their reputation.


  8. - D.P. Gumby - Friday, Oct 30, 09 @ 10:10 am:

    What has the Trib or the Sun-Times done recently to contribute to success of political reform??? The art of the possible, this was possible and is much more than existed before. All things being equal, I’d much rather see it and where it’s coming from than hold my breath until it’s capped.


  9. - wordslinger - Friday, Oct 30, 09 @ 10:10 am:

    It’s sure a lot further down the road than I expected.

    I suppose in an effort to remove money from politics, Tribune Co. will be offering free ads to candidates in the Chicago Tribune, on WGN TV and radio, CLTV and their associated websites? Or at least turning down that dirty filthy money and refusing the ads?


  10. - Louis Howe - Friday, Oct 30, 09 @ 10:14 am:

    Does anyone remember what was the purpose of campaign finance reform? Perhaps we could say this was the first step in a thousand mile journey, but not much else.


  11. - Rich Miller - Friday, Oct 30, 09 @ 10:15 am:

    I agree about Bethany. Her departure is a huge loss for the Statehouse. She is an amazingly hard worker, a top notch reporter, is firmly committed to online and multi-media and has helped drag Illinois Issues into the 21st Century.

    What a loss this is.


  12. - ChiTownguy - Friday, Oct 30, 09 @ 10:16 am:

    More than I expected and its a good start.

    I agree with Montrose. Its a good start. We must remember that legislation is about compromise and change is incremental.

    @ This Old Hack: No law will prevent a Ryan or Blagojevich from being corrupt. If they were not corrupt people, they would not have violated laws in place at the time. Would they have stopped because the laws were different? No.

    IMHO, the 48 hour reporting of any contribution of more than $1,000 is a little excessive. Even federal campaigns only have to do that within a few days of an election.


  13. - Wondering - Friday, Oct 30, 09 @ 10:18 am:

    Old Hack…

    “Kent Redfield, a campaign finance expert and retired University of Illinois Springfield professor, said the new disclosure rules might be the toughest in the country.”

    They will only be the toughest in the country if they are enforced and there are some teeth behind the enforcement.
    The rules in place today (some, at any rate) might be considered tough by some but when violations occur and fines are assessed they easily can be pleaded down or, even worse, ignored and the Board of Elections is toothless in enforcement. And worse, the violator(s) can skate by election dates without a worry while in violation of the rules.
    Whatever is put in place will never be perfect but to make the disclosure rules work there has to be concern on the part of candidates and their committees that a violation will bring about some serious repercussions.


  14. - Cindy Lou - Friday, Oct 30, 09 @ 10:21 am:

    Pfft, guess maybe I’ve grown too cynical with the state on bills and contracts, but seen way too many semis able to barrel through with loose interpretive pot holes. There’s usually a reason two sides spend hours/days negoitating over a word or two or three, a paragraph in or out…

    We have reform, guess we’ll find any pitfalls in and how much reform we actually got as time goes by.


  15. - Rich Miller - Friday, Oct 30, 09 @ 10:21 am:

    ===there has to be concern on the part of candidates and their committees that a violation will bring about some serious repercussions. ===

    Agreed. Regardless of any fines, getting tagged with a violation will undoubtedly become a campaign issue - as it should. That pressure will help keep people honest.

    OK, maybe “honest” isn’t the right word. Whatever. You get the idea.


  16. - this old hack - Friday, Oct 30, 09 @ 10:28 am:

    Wordsligner said it so well:

    ==I suppose in an effort to remove money from politics, Tribune Co. will be offering free ads to candidates in the Chicago Tribune, on WGN TV and radio, CLTV and their associated websites? Or at least turning down that dirty filthy money and refusing the ads?==

    100% correct, my friend. That alone would do more to reform anything than these caps. It is also why the Tribune and Sun-Times have not a leg to stand on when it comes to their endless pontificating on campaign finance.

    Let them put their money where their mouth is.


  17. - Will County Woman - Friday, Oct 30, 09 @ 10:30 am:

    it seems that when the impetus behind any reform is really just politics the outcome(s) will always be less than stellar and less than what was truly intended.

    maybe instead of pushing so hard and fast for reform in Illinois this year, the push for reform should have been a more methodical and strategic effort? I agree with reformers that this effort is a start. I just wish refomer types wouldn’t always set the bar so high, and would just set more realistic expectations in the first place instead.

    just like with healthcare reform at the national level the driver is politics.

    people are running for election and people want build political capital/legacy. something is better than nothing. whatever.


  18. - Captain Flume - Friday, Oct 30, 09 @ 10:43 am:

    Remember a couple days ago Rich commented that Tom Cross had drawn a line in the sand vis a vis standing by Change Illinois’ support of reform? I commented that lines in the sand have a habit of disappearing in with the tide and the wind. Looks like high tide and a gale just did some erasing.


  19. - ChiTownguy - Friday, Oct 30, 09 @ 10:44 am:

    I’m not certain we can say that a $5k limit per person to a candidate is the strictest in the country.

    MANY other states have far greater limits and reporting requirements.

    I always find this chart very helpful:
    http://www.ncsl.org/Portals/1/documents/legismgt/limits_candidates.pdf

    By my count, at least 32 states have lower limits on contributions.

    Again, its a step in the right direction, but the Professor’s quote seems a bit over the top.


  20. - Too funny - Friday, Oct 30, 09 @ 10:45 am:

    Tom Cross and Mike Tryon are even against giving their own Republican voters a vote in their own state party (SB600).

    Who really gives a darn about contribution limits when you don’t even have a voice in your own party?

    The Springfield GOP “leaders” are a joke.


  21. - anon - Friday, Oct 30, 09 @ 10:45 am:

    I have always questioned Change Illinois and anyone claiming to be a reformer as just a headline opportunist.


  22. - Rich Miller - Friday, Oct 30, 09 @ 10:50 am:

    ===the Professor’s quote seems a bit over the top. ===

    The professor was talking about disclosure, not caps.


  23. - CircularFiringSquad - Friday, Oct 30, 09 @ 10:59 am:

    It was curious, but not surprising, to see folks like Tryon, Black announcing ways to evade the system.
    The CHANGE IL folks should be commended for a willingness to compromise. Unlike some advocates who lack much real world experience in an area( no contibutors, campaign work, etc) they were willing to listen and learn.
    They know that despite all the bluster none of the current legislative leaders have been accused of a campaign finance wrong doing.
    When the finance bill is considered along with new powers for IGs, stronger ethics commissions and end to pay to play, etc; it is safe to say IL has taken big steps forward
    Most know that it is hard to stop true crooks —selling CDLs and Senate seats have been and continue to be illegal.
    You can take away the hiding places.
    In the meantime one must wonder why some push so hard to weaken the caucuses. Do they really want to give special interests more control? Or are they just that dumb?
    Let’s see one new organization thought it made sense to have the ComEd prexy on their board.
    I guess that says a lot.


  24. - MKK - Friday, Oct 30, 09 @ 11:00 am:

    These people really only serve their boards and their funders and they needed to say they got limits. Oh and the media attention doesn’t hurt.


  25. - Montrose - Friday, Oct 30, 09 @ 11:12 am:

    ++These people really only serve their boards and their funders and they needed to say they got limits.++

    I know I sound like a member of Change Illinois, but I am not. I have a hard time with the level of cynicism in a statement like this. I can be as cynical as the next guy, but to basically say they don’t care about change, they just care about what they can put in a grant proposal really ignores the commitment it takes for folks working on this issue and issues like it to see them through.

    This is generally thankless work. If folks were just doing it for a grant, they would not be in this line of work.


  26. - Laborguy - Friday, Oct 30, 09 @ 11:17 am:

    All the talk here, and in the newspapers, is about limiting the power of leadership. I hate to break the news to everyone but you can’t write a law that effectively limits the power of four people. Everyone has been focused on the wrong thing. You limit Madigan’s power by forcing candidates and parties to bring more citizens into the system as donors. Drastically lowering contribution limits to say $500 forces everyone to diversify their donor bases. This, and this alone, will eventually begin to limit the power of the four tops. The Trbune is being quite dishonest here because they do not support individual limits. The Tribune is only interested in limiting Madigan’s power vis a vi the Republicans. That was never going to work. Real reform means real limits on contributions. While this may very well be a step in the right direction I am not sure if and when their will be another opportunity to take a step. Certainly, not after everyone has been re-elected.


  27. - ChiTownguy - Friday, Oct 30, 09 @ 11:19 am:

    Rich, thanks for the clarification on the Prof’s quote.

    After skimming the bill, the penalties look appropriate at first blush. However, the self-funding clause caught my eye. Candidates who contribute more $100k to their own campaign ($250k for state wide) trigger the removal of any fundraising caps for their opposition.

    Similar federal legislation was struck down by the high court recently. How and why is this any different?


  28. - Rich Miller - Friday, Oct 30, 09 @ 11:20 am:

    Laborguy, you made lots of excellent points there. My only tiny quibble would be to say the threshold might be need to be even lower than $500 and that public funding is another option.


  29. - Rich Miller - Friday, Oct 30, 09 @ 11:21 am:

    ===Similar federal legislation was struck down by the high court recently. How and why is this any different? ===

    It was struck down because the non-self-funding opponents were allowed higher contribution caps while the self-funders’ caps stayed the same.


  30. - irving & ashland - Friday, Oct 30, 09 @ 11:28 am:

    They don’t get politics. They almost had what they truly needed — which is to go into an election against the intransigence of the legislature.

    They need to beat someone for being against reform before anything useful will ever happen. They let that chance slip through their fingers.


  31. - just sayin' - Friday, Oct 30, 09 @ 11:50 am:

    This is really good. Gotta check this out:

    http://www.despair.com/corruption.html

    I think this reflects the desperation of Tom Cross and his irrelevant GOP caucus. Mike Madigan Envy has really gotten the best of them.


  32. - Dem Observer - Friday, Oct 30, 09 @ 12:02 pm:

    The real issues isn’t the money; its a system that allows a guy who can only get elected in a tiny little section of Southwest Chicago to end up controlling state government.


  33. - this old hack - Friday, Oct 30, 09 @ 12:40 pm:

    @Dem Observer–or some bakery salesman from some place called Wood Dale who was the first to impose tight controls on legislation and amendments via the Rules Committee in his chamber. Don’t forget about him!


  34. - Analysis please - Friday, Oct 30, 09 @ 12:54 pm:

    Labor Guy is right on –the more individuals with a stake in he game the closer the game gets watched.


  35. - ABCBoy - Friday, Oct 30, 09 @ 1:17 pm:

    Massive loopholes in this bill. Unless I missed some other provision, people could game this system very, very easily. For example:

    Individual donations to candidates is capped at $5,000. But Individual donations to PACs generally is capped at $10,000. And PAC donations to individual candidates is capped at $50,000.

    Now, the law says that individuals can’t just set up multiple PACs on their own. But what if, say, five rich guys got together and decided to support a candidate?

    At first glance, they’d be capped at $5K each, with a total of a $25,000 donation to Candidate X.

    But Rich Guys A, B, C, D, and E could each set up their own PAC. Then, since they’re all friends and want to support Candidate X, they could all agree to cut themselves the maximum allowable $10,000 check to each of their PACs.

    Rich Guy PAC A now has $50K.
    Rich Guy PAC B now has $50K.
    Rich Guy PAC C now has $50K.
    Rich Guy PAC D now has $50K.
    Rich Guy PAC E now has $50K.

    Since they all love Candidate X, they all channel their PACs to Candidate X’s campaign: $250,000.

    Not to mention the individual $5,000 checks that they can still cash, plus any corporations they happen to own too.

    So, minus a few grand in legal expenses to do all of the paperwork, five guys just did a huge run-around and were able to give Candidate X almost $300,000 whereas if they follow the intent of the law they’d be capped at $25,000.

    Unless I’m missing something here, it’s loophole city.


  36. - Rich Miller - Friday, Oct 30, 09 @ 1:19 pm:

    ABCBoy, is that provision any different from federal law?


  37. - ABCBoy - Friday, Oct 30, 09 @ 1:29 pm:

    No idea. But if it’s the same, it simply points out the absurdity of federal law too.

    I suppose it’s possible that there’s a provision somewhere that includes forensic accounting to trace the aggregate dollars that a donor may give in total. In my example above, it’s very easy to do since the PACs all just had $50K and they all went to the same candidate. A very crude example. But if more donations from 3rd parties when to the PACs of the 5 rich guys, and since money is fungible, it’s almost impossible to see if an individual exceeded their limit by using these PACs as pass-through vehicles. The more dollars and donors going to a PAC, the easier it would be to muddy the waters and claim that the money “north of $5,000″ that went to Rich Guy PAC 1, for example, actually went to Candidate Y and not Candidate X.

    Barring a copy of an email or a letter or a check stub from an individual that said, “$10,000 To Rich Guy PAC 2, for the express purposes of giving to Candidate X” it’d be awfully hard to prove. And most of these guys playing political shell games wouldn’t be that stupid to make it that obvious.


  38. - MKK - Friday, Oct 30, 09 @ 1:34 pm:

    Look at the enforcement provisions the reformers blessed and praised. The SBE must define “good faith” and can only fine offenders for “wilful” violations and then only $5000 max. Whoops or we were really busy and tried our best means no case may be brought. No one should expect much in way of enforcement here.


  39. - wordslinger - Friday, Oct 30, 09 @ 2:47 pm:

    As everyone parses the bills that passed, can I bring up again: Was it the parties and legislative leaders that were shaking everyone down?

    The corruption comes from the awarding of contracts and release of money. We saw that with Blago, right?


  40. - LincolnLounger - Friday, Oct 30, 09 @ 4:47 pm:

    Though I don’t always agree with her, I’ve always respected Cindi Canary — until now. Shame. Better nothing than this joke of “reform”.


  41. - fgs - Friday, Oct 30, 09 @ 9:10 pm:

    Canary’s support is indefensible. She can’t be taken seriously after this.


Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.


* I'm not buying it
* Sick day
* Yesterday's blog posts

Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...

...............

...............


Search This Blog...

Search the 98th General Assembly By Bill Number
(example: HB0001)

Search the 98th General Assembly By Keyword

          
        * iPhone 6 sales, Windows 9 event, Moto X preorders & more – Pocketnow Daily
        * Panasonic Lumix CM1 is a smartphone and a real camera in one
        * Apple approves a $1000 app that lets the iPhone 5s shoot 4K video, sort of
        * Oppo N3 event teased for October; leaked renders are hot
        * Motorola gives Moto X discount for users with .edu email
        * PayPal Launches Ad Subtly Attacking Apple for Recent iCloud Photo Leak
        * Tim Cook Holds Firm On iMessage Security: It’s Encrypted, And We Don’t Have A Key

        * Google: Worldwide Government Requests For User Data Up By 150%
        * PayPal’s Ad Questions Apple Pay’s Security
        * Chrome For Android Displays Yours Answers In Search Suggestions
        * Samsung Galaxy Note 4 Found To Have The Best Performing Display
        * Tim Cook Addresses Privacy And Security Concerns
        * iPod Nano Inspired The Apple Watch’s Design
        * HTC Nexus 9 Keyboard Accessory Spotted At The NCC

        * White Sox likely to stay with six-man rotation
        * Konerko moving toward return during road trip
        * Abreu learns from Konerko's professionalism
        * Reading Room: Jose Abreu ties a White Sox rookie record his way
        * Twins 6, White Sox 4: Sweep hopes evaporate early
        * Danks looks to finish rough second half on high note vs. Royals
        * Abreu ties White Sox rookie home run record


        Main Menu
        Home
        Illinois
        YouTube
        Pundit rankings
        Obama
        Subscriber Content
        Durbin
        Burris
        Blagojevich Trial
        Advertising
        Updated Posts
        Polls

        Archives
        September 2014
        August 2014
        July 2014
        June 2014
        May 2014
        April 2014
        March 2014
        February 2014
        January 2014
        December 2013
        November 2013
        October 2013
        September 2013
        August 2013
        July 2013
        June 2013
        May 2013
        April 2013
        March 2013
        February 2013
        January 2013
        December 2012
        November 2012
        October 2012
        September 2012
        August 2012
        July 2012
        June 2012
        May 2012
        April 2012
        March 2012
        February 2012
        January 2012
        December 2011
        November 2011
        October 2011
        September 2011
        August 2011
        July 2011
        June 2011
        May 2011
        April 2011
        March 2011
        February 2011
        January 2011
        December 2010
        November 2010
        October 2010
        September 2010
        August 2010
        July 2010
        June 2010
        May 2010
        April 2010
        March 2010
        February 2010
        January 2010
        December 2009
        November 2009
        October 2009
        September 2009
        August 2009
        July 2009
        June 2009
        May 2009
        April 2009
        March 2009
        February 2009
        January 2009
        December 2008
        November 2008
        October 2008
        September 2008
        August 2008
        July 2008
        June 2008
        May 2008
        April 2008
        March 2008
        February 2008
        January 2008
        December 2007
        November 2007
        October 2007
        September 2007
        August 2007
        July 2007
        June 2007
        May 2007
        April 2007
        March 2007
        February 2007
        January 2007
        December 2006
        November 2006
        October 2006
        September 2006
        August 2006
        July 2006
        June 2006
        May 2006
        April 2006
        March 2006
        February 2006
        January 2006
        December 2005
        April 2005
        March 2005
        February 2005
        January 2005
        December 2004
        November 2004
        October 2004

        Blog*Spot Archives
        November 2005
        October 2005
        September 2005
        August 2005
        July 2005
        June 2005
        May 2005

        Syndication

        RSS Feed 2.0
        Comments RSS 2.0
        WordPress

        Loading


        * Gov. Quinn keeps animal abuser on state payroll.....
        * AIDS Run and Walk Chicago wraps up with over $3.....


        * Quinn: Monitor not needed to oversee state hiring
        * Man convicted in girl's death during 2011 burglary
        * Students sickened, carbon monoxide leak suspected
        * Governor candidates focus on business, hiring
        * 2nd year of Illinois osprey project wraps up
        * Durbin's views on issues as he faces re-election
        * AP Interview: Durbin denies 'bullying' businesses
        * Carbon monoxide suspected in student illnesses
        * Springfield cemetery restoring Abe Lincoln's vault
        * Peoria cricket group attracts Indian immigrants

        * Quinn, Rauner clash on business, hiring
        * Coaltion forms to push school funding reform
        * Rauner’s education plan raises eyebrows
        * Governor’s race a tale of business climates
        * Medical marijuana law sponsor defends secret bids
        * Fired IDOT workers sue, say they are ‘political cover’ for Quinn
        * Illinois still employs 173 'improper' state hires
        * Fired IDOT workers sue, say they are 'political cover' for Quinn
        * State lawmakers propose surcharge to pay for police body cameras
        * Surcharge sought for police cameras

        * Lampert agrees to lend Sears $400 million
        * United offers up to $100,000 if workers leave
        * U of C, UIC among finalists for Obama library
        * Sen. Durbin denies 'bullying' business
        * Mike Madigan pulls in $358,000 — in one weekend


        * Jury finds man guilty of killing girl in Indian Head Park
        * Gold Coast boutique hit by burglars
        * Gov’t should  renegotiate  FBI building lease
        * 9/11 survivor recalls in Chicago speech harrowing moments
        * Mourners struggle with Indiana officer’s death; funeral is Monday
        * Hundreds pay homage at slain Merrillville officer’s funeral
        * Mourners struggle with Indiana officer’s death; funeral is Monday morning


        * Illinois Supreme Court disbars, censures lawyers
        * Guilty verdict in slaying of 14-year-old stabbed in her home in Indian Head Park
        * Naperville man contracts West Nile virus
        * Man charged with trying to kill police officer
        * Pedestrian killed in crash involving Wheeling officer, 'wanted to succeed...help our family'
        * Trial set for cop charged in woman's death
        * Slain Merrillville Officer Nick Schultz honored
        * Handyman who took guinea pig gets probation for trespassing
        * Man, 70, charged with child sex assault
        * Tillman out for season with torn triceps


        * Schools CEO: privatizing janitorial services not 'as smooth as we would like'
        * What's The Best Way To Help Kids In Struggling Schools?
        * Quinn Defends Public Education, Though He's A Product of Private Schools
        * Local Response To Ferguson
        * AFSCME Puts Aside Differences, Endorses Quinn
        * The Future Of Downtown Springfield Inc. In Jeopardy
        * A Practice In Poverty
        * Treasurer Candidate Tom Cross Says He Would Sue The Legislature To Force A Balanced Budget
        * Fired IDOT Workers Sue Quinn Administration
        * Inspector's Report Reveals Clout Hiring At IDOT


        * Quinn, Rauner clash on business, hiring
        * Becker Family: Our community is better united
        * Coaltion forms to push school funding reform
        * Rauner’s education plan raises eyebrows
        * Our Opinion: It’s time to get serious about sewers in Springfield
        * Bernard Schoenburg: Be careful when they talk of property taxes
        * Charles Krauthammer: Obama’s uncertain trumpet, again
        * Governor’s race a tale of business climates
        * Statehouse Insider: Christie should feel at home in Illinois
        * Susan Koch: Examples of excellence showcased in honors program


        * A gift from the heart
        * HS Volleyball: PBL vs. Tuscola
        * Police reports
        * Gifford trustees discuss construction complaints
        * Sparta to hold derby race
        * Retailer eyeing five-acre plot behind Menards in Marion
        * News-Gazette SportsPage 9/15/14
        * Simon visits Du Quoin school
        * Updated: Champaign police investigate bank robbery
        * Monday Rewind: Plays of the Game Washington


        * Elk Grove's Pizza 4 Patriots? How about Operation Cookie Drop
        * Imrem: We are to blame for NFL's arrogance
        * Jesse White vows this will be his last term – again
        * Palermo, Allen just getting started for Glenbard East
        * Wadsworth man sentenced to 14 years for sex assault at Lambs Farm

        * Ask Peter: Obamacare's Broken Promises - I...
        * Peter Roskam pushes for Alzheimer's resear...
        * Congressman: 'Some good stuff is going on'...
        * Enterprise Recovery Systems Hosts Congress...
        * Letter: Roskam's actions should match his ...
        * Roskam: Making college more affordable for...
        * Army Veteran Shane Scherer Joins Roskam's ...
        * Roskam talks tax reform, health care, immi...
        * Roskam hires wounded veteran in West Chica...
        * Hultgren, Roskam to Host Service Academy D...

        * AP Interview: Durbin denies 'bullying' bus......
        * AP Interview: Durbin denies 'bullying' bus......
        * AP Interview: Durbin denies 'bullying' bus......
        * AP Interview: Durbin denies 'bullying' bus......
        * AP Interview: Durbin denies 'bullying' bus......

        * ISIS fight: Congress to vote on arming Syr......
        * Op-Ed: Mark Kirk has more to fear than Mic......

        * Richard Skoda’s dreams.
        * Anita Alvarez's husband investigated for tax exemptions
        * Durbin abruptly cuts off interview with hometown TV station
        * U.S. Senate Moves Forward With Paycheck Fairness Act
        * Senate Republicans Quash Citizens United Amendment
        * Illinois Education Association Endorses Schneider
        * Report: Wage Theft Costs U.S. Workers Billions Of Dollars Annually (UPDATED)
        * UPDATE x1: New Rauner Ad: "No Social Agenda" Means Pro-Abortion and Pro Gay Marriage
        * Chicago Magazine asks: "Will the Real Bruce Rauner Please Stand Up?"
        * Quinn Leading Rauner In New Poll


        * Rauner renews call for Quinn to fire illegal patronage hires
        * Public Betrayal: The Quinn Patronage Scandal Unfolds
        * Sun-Times Report: In Illegal Hiring Scandal, Pat Quinn Protects “Kingmaker” Kin
        * Governor Quinn Announces Clean Water Investments in Stickney and Burbank - Projects Will Modernize Infrastructure, Combat Damaging Floods and Create Jobs
        * Governor Quinn Honors “Latinos Building Illinois” - Thompson Center Exhibit Showcases Trailblazers For Latino Heritage Month




            Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller