SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      Mobile Version     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact
CapitolFax.com
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
Question of the day

Tuesday, Nov 30, 2010

* The setup

In all, candidates and political committees spent an estimated $3 billion airing television, radio and Internet commercials in local, state and federal races, up from $2.7 billion in 2008 and $2.4 billion in 2006, according to Campaign Media Analysis Group, a division of Kantar Media that tracks political advertising.

About two-thirds of the money — an estimated $2 billion — was used to purchase airtime from local television stations.

* The Question: Should FCC regulated television and radio stations be obligated to give much larger discounts to political candidates, or even offer free air time? Explain.

- Posted by Rich Miller        


29 Comments
  1. - Cheryl44 - Tuesday, Nov 30, 10 @ 11:02 am:

    They should be able to charge political candidates/committees *more* than they charge anyone else. Maybe we wouldn’t be deluged with political ads in the weeks leading up to an election.


  2. - Oswego Willy - Tuesday, Nov 30, 10 @ 11:05 am:

    In a Free Market … if you are one of the “Rich” candidates, and you are self-funding, do you get an even MORE special rate? No. It is what the market will bare, and if you are desperate enough to get on-air, you will pay the freight.

    No discount, no special rate, if you can get on-air, good for you.


  3. - UISer - Tuesday, Nov 30, 10 @ 11:10 am:

    There should be a special rate that apply to all viable political candidates. By viable, I mean the major party candidates.

    There are groups out there arguing for campaign reform, this would be a great way to take some of the money out of politics. In addition, as a trade off for the discount, there could be limits placed on the amount of commericials that are allowed to run for a given race (i.e. more for a Congressional race, less for a State Rep. race.)


  4. - 47th Ward - Tuesday, Nov 30, 10 @ 11:12 am:

    I’d support giving candidate committees a more generous discount than 527s or IEs. In fact, I wouldn’t give IEs any discount until they disclose their donors.

    As for free air time, we can dream, can’t we? except then you run into the problem of what to do about Rich Whitney, Mike Labno, et al. At what threshold do you determine eligibility for free air time?

    While we might get some entertainment out of it (the rent is too damn high), doling out free TV time would be very problematic for the stations.


  5. - Oswego Willy - Tuesday, Nov 30, 10 @ 11:14 am:

    ===there could be limits placed on the amount of commericials that are allowed to run for a given race===

    What about freedon of speech … you only get your message out “5″ times? That doesn’t sound like a free election, sounds like a socialism style “everyone the same” in a given race.

    Money is the Mother’s Milk of politics, and if you can’t raise it then you can’t run, and if you CAN raise it, you should be able to spend it, legally, in any way possible, including media, without limitations.


  6. - shore - Tuesday, Nov 30, 10 @ 11:16 am:

    No. For all the whining about money in politics I submit to you joe walsh, kinzinger, hultgren and schilling all of which were outspent. with the internet and new media there are now lots of ways to raise money and get a message out. there’s no need for discounts in the name of “good government”.

    plus I for one really don’t want anything that will INCREASE the number of ads.


  7. - Lakefront Liberal - Tuesday, Nov 30, 10 @ 11:17 am:

    How about this — they give an equal ammount of free air time to all candidates in a given race (if they meet some threshold of viability) AND no additional air time beyond this could be purchased. That would really take money out of campaigns (what would there be to raise money for?) and would hugely level the playing field. It would probably produce a more informed electorate as well.


  8. - No Peotone Airport - Tuesday, Nov 30, 10 @ 11:22 am:

    Why stop at air time? Let’s give them free rent for their campaign office, free utilities, free phones, free billboards, free printing, free postage, and free anything else they’re presently compelled to purchase. No paid staff or consultants, either. If someone’s going to the trouble of running for office, all their prospective vendors should be happy to suspend making their living for the duration of the campaign.


  9. - UISer - Tuesday, Nov 30, 10 @ 11:23 am:

    =Money is the Mother’s Milk of politics, and if you can’t raise it then you can’t run, and if you CAN raise it, you should be able to spend it, legally, in any way possible, including media, without limitations.=

    This is just a fundamental disagreement that we have. Elections should not be sold to the highest bidder. The FCC allows for public use of the airwaves on the major networks, so only those networks should be effected in any type of deal. There will be the ability to spend like crazy on Fox News or the Food Network, but the public airwaves should’nt have to be bought by a particular candidate.

    =No. For all the whining about money in politics I submit to you joe walsh, kinzinger, hultgren and schilling all of which were outspent.=

    Come on Shore, you don’t really believe that. All of these candidates were propped up by outside groups that spent a ton of money on each race, especially Schilling.


  10. - Peter - Tuesday, Nov 30, 10 @ 11:25 am:

    @UISer - There already is a special rate: my lowest. I can’t charge a candidate less than my lowest rate for their chosen time period. You can’t buy morning drive for 3:00 AM rates, but you’re still taking avails at the lowest for-profit cost. We had a busy October this year, our best month in ages even without the political bump, and if I had any more political buys I don’t know what I would have done. No room. Give a politician the same money and cheaper rates, and they’ll just buy more time (which goes to answer the question: no, the system is fine as it is now.)

    We’re one of the few small market radio stations who still care about public affairs (State Rep and Senator, mayors, county commissioners, state agency people live in studio for calls once a month) and it’s a struggle in this economy when we could just strip down, go satellite with a little local sports, and maybe make just about as much money (with higher margin after you cut those nasty costs like live call-in public affairs programs.) I don’t want to gouge those running for offices, but cutting it cheaper is playing with fire.

    Free time opens up a huge Pandora’s Box. I’d blow my brains out before trying to navigate that mess.


  11. - WRMNpolitics - Tuesday, Nov 30, 10 @ 11:25 am:

    Politicians can generally get the lowest rates charged by the stations by FCC regulation.The rates are available to all candidates. Media outlets, although federally regulated are for profit businesses. The only “product” they have to sell is time, which is a perishable commodity. Why should broadcast outlets, be required to provide “free” product when other competing advertising methods are not. Candidates have a variety of means to get out their message and plan their media strategies and raise funds accordingly.


  12. - Oswego Willy - Tuesday, Nov 30, 10 @ 11:36 am:

    I have yet to see EVERY winner be the one who spent the MOST money.

    Freedom of Speech - if you limit a candidate to any number of opportunities to be in paid media, then aren’t you denying Freedom of Speech?

    Since when is running for office a “right”? You do have a right to run for office, given you meet all criteria, but what “right” do you have to get “required equal” access to the airwaves, and further, a limited amount of access to get YOUR message out? So, you have a “right” to paid media, AND a right to limit your opponent’s access, only if it equals yours????

    Money is a measurement of strength in a campaign. It is. What is one of the first questions asked about a candidate, and further, what is one of the first thing guys like Rich looks at … what does a candidate have in the bank. Why? Viability.

    You can’t deny someone the freedom to spend money on their races, just as you can’t deny an opponent limited paid media. That is not a free election, sounds more like an Orwellian “Animal Farm” equal, but some are more equal than others …

    Free-Market … raise some cash, and go at it!


  13. - Ghost - Tuesday, Nov 30, 10 @ 11:36 am:

    I dont think TV or radio stations should be required to subsidize a political campaign just becauseof the business they choose to run.

    Nor should companies with large bill boards or buildings be required to provide space for free or low cost for political messages or advertisents.


  14. - wordslinger - Tuesday, Nov 30, 10 @ 12:04 pm:

    –Why stop at air time? –

    Public airwaves.


  15. - zatoichi - Tuesday, Nov 30, 10 @ 12:16 pm:

    You choose to run and the price to be paid includes the real costs for things you buy during the campaign. Ads, signs, handouts. Can’t pay it? Don’t run or work harder to get more supporters.


  16. - Responsa - Tuesday, Nov 30, 10 @ 12:35 pm:

    Campaigns already get to circumvent the “DO NOT CALL” list– a perk helpfully slipped in and granted by congressional politicians, which is essentially like getting free advertising. FCC should stay out of it. No discounts or free air time for political ads.


  17. - Cook County Commoner - Tuesday, Nov 30, 10 @ 12:37 pm:

    No. Federal government functions as an oligarchy, primarily answering to special interests. The FCC is part of the government, and therefore it is vulnerable to manipulation by whichever special interest holds sway. As useless and tasteless I may find most media campaign advertising, putting the FCC in charge is like putting the fox in charge of the henhouse. Let the campaigns and media providers haggle out whatever terms they want. A candidate for the US Presidency should pay the same media rate as would the company that sells the pocket fisherman. If there are low budget candidates out there with fresh ideas, they don’t need to soil themselves on major media. The internet will provide a forum, and they will be found. And the money will come in, and they too can then damage their reputations on FCC controlled media.


  18. - nah - Tuesday, Nov 30, 10 @ 12:43 pm:

    The only candidates that free airtime will help are kooks like Andy Martin or Mike Labno. They’ll never have a shot no matter how much free airtime they get so why bother?


  19. - Gregor Samsa - Tuesday, Nov 30, 10 @ 12:47 pm:

    Absolutely; this has been my particular hobby-horse since I started reading this blog.

    Broadcast media has gone into the toilet since deregulation and abandonment of the Fairness Doctrine. When the FCC was created out of the Dept. of Commerce, it was established that the airwaves (today we’d call it “bandwidth” or more properly, “Spectrum”) was the nation’s national resource, one with natural limits due to physics. As part of getting a broadcast license, allowing them to use their allotment of that spectrum to sell people things, it was understood that broadcasters in turn had a duty and obligation to serve the public good in exchange for what is essentially a license to print money.

    That duty and obligation was expressed thru a percentage of their airtime devoted to “public service programming”. Election coverage was part of this. News was part of this. A loss leader, but seen as the quid for the pro quo.

    Then broadcasters got greedy.
    Especially under Reagan, and ever since, they continued to erode their responsibilities and claimed that market forces would be adequate to enforce the social compact. We see the results. No, a natural monopoly like broadcast spectrum is not something that plays by the proper rules of capitalism. We never should have let that happen.

    And this directly leads us to the poster child for my scrred: Blago.

    Why did Blago need to raise over twenty million bucks? To buy that TV airtime he used to destroy Vallas and Topinka. To get the money to buy the airtime, he sold the entire state a piece at a time. It is just how life is, that raising big money leads to the people with the money calling all the shots, and this is completely anti-American. It short-circuits the democratic process and turns it into a commercial capital process.

    What I want is for all the officially recognized candidates to get an equal but limited amount of free air time on TV and radio. Take the cost of the media buys out of the equation. Also, stations would be duty-bound to air debates. Considering they make money off of us 365 days a year, they can afford to do this “charity” work every 2 years for a campaign season.

    This might also stimulate more revenue for newspapers, helping bring them back from the edge.

    Will it happen? Doubtful, the broadcasting and ad lobby is very strong, and fighting them without antitrust legislation is like that old saw about getting into a letter writing fight with a newspaper publisher that buys ink by the barrel. They have all the advantages now, and you can bet they will work to keep and extend them. We are the ones who suffer, with poor service in the distribution of news and information to base our elections on.

    As long as it costs money to run political ads, we’re really just ruled by oligarchs.


  20. - silverback - Tuesday, Nov 30, 10 @ 1:04 pm:

    Why don’t we just Nationalize all business? How many other businesses do we make give their product or service away?


  21. - So IL Student - Tuesday, Nov 30, 10 @ 1:09 pm:

    At least a discounted rate. I believe the high cost of this kind of stuff is stifling some debates, and thus setting up a road block for a democratic environment.

    In an era of blurbs, 30 second news cuts, and CNN homepage-style newspapers, we need information. Lower the costs and increase advertising. I say, the more the better. Maybe something like this will yield a better informed electorate. That is not to say that all the ads will be jam-packed full of useful information, but it will lead to conversation and that is something the nation is lacking.


  22. - wordslinger - Tuesday, Nov 30, 10 @ 1:14 pm:

    –Why don’t we just Nationalize all business?–

    Again, public airwaves.


  23. - silverback - Tuesday, Nov 30, 10 @ 1:15 pm:

    Why not prohibit radio and tv adv. for political campaigns altogether. Make the written word the standard. Maybe their lies would be easier to keep track of and harder for them to deny.


  24. - Living In Oklahoma - Tuesday, Nov 30, 10 @ 1:24 pm:

    Absolutely Not. Broadcast Media already has to give politicians the cheapest rate that they have offered in the previous ten years. I can only imagine the tsunami of ads that I would get in my e.mail box if I had to give away the air time to politicians. Don’t think media owners don’t have political agendas as well. At least there is motivation for programmers and owners to take advertising dollars from both sides now.

    If stations have to “give away” the air time, who do you think are going to get the majority of this free air time? Its going to be those candidates that nuzzle up to the media and the media agenda.

    Furthermore, who is going to schedule, record and produce all the “free” ads. Is someone going to send me a check so that I can pay the extra labor costs that will come with election season? I doubt it, as usual a great idea on paper that no one has thought through.


  25. - Anonymous - Tuesday, Nov 30, 10 @ 2:17 pm:

    “It short-circuits the democratic process and turns it into a commercial capital process.”–

    Capitalism is not anti-American, capitalism has found extemely fertile ground here. And America is not a democracy. America is a representative republic (thank you Texas School Board). Those raising funds and campaigning for office do so on the capitalist ideal, not a small-d democratic one. Campaign funds are investments, not charity donations.


  26. - Ghost of John Brown - Tuesday, Nov 30, 10 @ 2:24 pm:

    No.

    Like it or not, part of the cash that candidates accumulate is a sign of the support that they get. I know, some if it is from corporations or unions, but that also indicates a certain level of support. We have fringe candidates (oh, how I would like to name names) that don’t have support, but would love a loud microphone. The trouble is, that there are already WAY too many voices during the election cycle and it is hard for any candidate to get their message out. If all of the fringe candidates get money (or discounts), then it will make getting the message out even harder.

    What WOULD be helpful is to somehow limit the amount that “self funders” can throw at a campaign. We’ve had plenty of those in the last decade - none have done well, but they have drowned out many good candidates.


  27. - Concerned Observer - Tuesday, Nov 30, 10 @ 3:07 pm:

    I’m actually with the first response. The prices need to go UP. I’d prefer to see them fixed at the *highest* regular rate charged within the past 60/90 days (per daypart/program, of course).

    The cost of airtime hasn’t risen nearly fast enough to keep up with the massive amounts of money being poured into political campaigns.


  28. - Peter - Tuesday, Nov 30, 10 @ 3:16 pm:

    @Gregor Samsa: So what about those broadcasters that still exist in the spirit of public service? That do live, local election coverage - even on primary night. That not only cover state and local news but give a chance for the locals to speak directly to their reps, their county commissioners, their mayor, etc. That do more than just play PSAs or mention the time of the local blood drive, but hold fundraisers and give any local group with an effort a chance to promote it at no cost. And all of this has us operating on razor thin margins since our rates aren’t really any different from twenty years ago because the market won’t bear it.

    You’re going to punish us because of the Clear Channels and Sinclairs of the world? Bad form.

    Better solution: the FCC starts making the big boys live up to their license requirements rather than using them as jukeboxes with a generic public affairs program ran at 6:00 am on Sunday and an operating EAS that two people in the building - no, company - know how to operate.


  29. - Cincinnatus - Tuesday, Nov 30, 10 @ 4:18 pm:

    Doesn’t matter if it is a political ad or toilet paper (which when used closely resembles the former). An ad is an ad is an ad and should not have any special limitations based on content.


Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.


* I'm not buying it
* Sick day
* Yesterday's blog posts

Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...

...............

...............


Search This Blog...

Search the 98th General Assembly By Bill Number
(example: HB0001)

Search the 98th General Assembly By Keyword

          
        * Verizon customers eligible for upgrade before Nov 15
        * Cellphone users get a dedicated sidewalk lane in China
        * Lumia Cyan to Denim: the feature-bursting upgrade path
        * Apple Patents A Strange Physics-Based GUI For iPad File And Folder Manipulation
        * Why Apple changed my mind about smartwatches
        * Visual Search Company Slyce Buys Pounce For $5M To Build “Amazon Firefly” For The Rest Of Retail
        * Motorola UK website now lets you buy a Moto G directly

        * Tweak Chrome for Android to Answer Questions in the Suggestions Box
        * Will Minecraft’s Power Users Stick Around For Minecrosoft? “Wait and See.”
        * Ecobee Launches New Smart Thermostat
        * Divinity Original Sin Update Adds Two New Characters (video)
        * Radio The Size Of An Ant Developed, Doesn’t Require External Energy
        * iPad Air 2 Protective Case Leaked
        * Ecobee may have the killer app for the smart home and thoughts on wearables

        * White Sox get another look at Bassitt against KC
        * White Sox 'pen burned by KC's speed in ninth
        * South Side Sox Podcast: AL Central Showdown
        * Bullpen can't preserve Danks' fine start in KC
        * Royals 4, White Sox 3: Defense, bullpen astound again
        * White Sox likely to stay with six-man rotation
        * Konerko moving toward return during road trip


        Main Menu
        Home
        Illinois
        YouTube
        Pundit rankings
        Obama
        Subscriber Content
        Durbin
        Burris
        Blagojevich Trial
        Advertising
        Updated Posts
        Polls

        Archives
        September 2014
        August 2014
        July 2014
        June 2014
        May 2014
        April 2014
        March 2014
        February 2014
        January 2014
        December 2013
        November 2013
        October 2013
        September 2013
        August 2013
        July 2013
        June 2013
        May 2013
        April 2013
        March 2013
        February 2013
        January 2013
        December 2012
        November 2012
        October 2012
        September 2012
        August 2012
        July 2012
        June 2012
        May 2012
        April 2012
        March 2012
        February 2012
        January 2012
        December 2011
        November 2011
        October 2011
        September 2011
        August 2011
        July 2011
        June 2011
        May 2011
        April 2011
        March 2011
        February 2011
        January 2011
        December 2010
        November 2010
        October 2010
        September 2010
        August 2010
        July 2010
        June 2010
        May 2010
        April 2010
        March 2010
        February 2010
        January 2010
        December 2009
        November 2009
        October 2009
        September 2009
        August 2009
        July 2009
        June 2009
        May 2009
        April 2009
        March 2009
        February 2009
        January 2009
        December 2008
        November 2008
        October 2008
        September 2008
        August 2008
        July 2008
        June 2008
        May 2008
        April 2008
        March 2008
        February 2008
        January 2008
        December 2007
        November 2007
        October 2007
        September 2007
        August 2007
        July 2007
        June 2007
        May 2007
        April 2007
        March 2007
        February 2007
        January 2007
        December 2006
        November 2006
        October 2006
        September 2006
        August 2006
        July 2006
        June 2006
        May 2006
        April 2006
        March 2006
        February 2006
        January 2006
        December 2005
        April 2005
        March 2005
        February 2005
        January 2005
        December 2004
        November 2004
        October 2004

        Blog*Spot Archives
        November 2005
        October 2005
        September 2005
        August 2005
        July 2005
        June 2005
        May 2005

        Syndication

        RSS Feed 2.0
        Comments RSS 2.0
        WordPress

        Loading


        * Will the Real Bruce Rauner Please Stand Up?..
        * AFSCME Puts Aside Differences, Endorses Quinn..
        * The Country’s Opinion Of Congress Has NEVER Bee.....
        * Activists want you to know more about female co.....
        * Five lessons from the heartland..
        * Double trouble..
        * Randolph County Board approves poker run ordinance..
        * Gov. Quinn keeps animal abuser on state payroll.....


        * Fire officials: 1 injured in Elgin house explosion
        * Hearing set for man accused in deadly bank holdup
        * Video of lawmaker tirade resurfaces in House race
        * Quinn: Monitor not needed to oversee state hiring
        * Man convicted in girl's death during 2011 burglary
        * Students sickened, carbon monoxide leak suspected
        * Governor candidates focus on business, hiring
        * 2nd year of Illinois osprey project wraps up
        * Durbin's views on issues as he faces re-election
        * AP Interview: Durbin denies 'bullying' businesses

        * Video of state lawmaker's tirade resurfaces in U.S. House race
        * Rauner’s call for firings of ‘illegal patronage hires’ would affect many in Springfield
        * Quinn, Rauner clash on business, hiring
        * Coaltion forms to push school funding reform
        * Rauner’s education plan raises eyebrows
        * Governor’s race a tale of business climates
        * Medical marijuana law sponsor defends secret bids
        * Fired IDOT workers sue, say they are ‘political cover’ for Quinn
        * Illinois still employs 173 'improper' state hires
        * Fired IDOT workers sue, say they are 'political cover' for Quinn

        * Tribune Publishing invests in a content-marketing shop
        * Lampert agrees to lend Sears $400 million
        * United offers up to $100,000 if workers leave
        * U of C, UIC among finalists for Obama library
        * Sen. Durbin denies 'bullying' business


        * Odds favor Chicago sites — U. of C. or UIC — for Obama library
        * University of Chicago, UIC among Obama library finalists
        * Gov’t should  renegotiate  FBI building lease
        * Gold Coast boutique hit by burglars
        * Jury finds man guilty of killing girl in Indian Head Park
        * Man shot by cops charged with attempted murder
        * Marshall High School principal has been 'reassigned,' CPS says
        * Byrd-Bennett: CPS cleaning contractors will be held accountable
        * Fioretti blasts Emanuel for increasing city retirees’ health-care premiums
        * Rauner: Quinn pretending to be a ‘folksy, bumbling fool’


        * Man critically hurt during Near North car crash
        * Riot Fest cleanup begins
        * Police: Boy accused of bringing gun to school
        * Man seriously injured during Elgin house explosion
        * CPD foundation to launch bulletproof vest initiative
        * Slain Merrillville Officer Nick Schultz honored
        * Guilty verdict in slaying of 14-year-old stabbed in her home in Indian Head Park
        * Illinois Supreme Court disbars, censures lawyers
        * Naperville man contracts West Nile virus
        * Man charged with trying to kill police officer


        * Technology Is Changing Decatur Classrooms
        * Legislature Approved A $100 Million Tax On Business & Didn't Know It
        * Schools CEO: privatizing janitorial services not 'as smooth as we would like'
        * What's The Best Way To Help Kids In Struggling Schools?
        * Quinn Defends Public Education, Though He's A Product of Private Schools
        * Local Response To Ferguson
        * AFSCME Puts Aside Differences, Endorses Quinn
        * The Future Of Downtown Springfield Inc. In Jeopardy
        * A Practice In Poverty
        * Treasurer Candidate Tom Cross Says He Would Sue The Legislature To Force A Balanced Budget


        * Video of state lawmaker's tirade resurfaces in U.S. House race
        * Rauner’s call for firings of ‘illegal patronage hires’ would affect many in Springfield
        * Another view: New law might boost clothing recycling
        * John Freml: Bishop Paprocki does not speak for all Catholics
        * Quinn, Rauner clash on business, hiring
        * Becker Family: Our community is better united
        * Coaltion forms to push school funding reform
        * Rauner’s education plan raises eyebrows
        * Our Opinion: It’s time to get serious about sewers in Springfield
        * Bernard Schoenburg: Be careful when they talk of property taxes


        * New Athens man killed when car crashes in bean field
        * Better local services linked to jail mental health issues
        * CHS expands, retrains mental health crisis team
        * Wise regrets polarization over Salaita
        * Area history, Sept. 16, 2014
        * Iroquois board backs medical marijuana facility near Cissna Park
        * This day in history: Sept. 16, 2014
        * Villa Grove exchange students open up about their time in the States
        * Paxton cookoff 'like a friendly tailgate'
        * Monticello teacher a 'superstar,' state finalist


        * Trump Plaza shuts down; 4th AC casino to close
        * Emanuel says students met reading goal; Fallon should pick a venue
        * North: Why I don't want to see Rice, Peterson play again
        * Clooney to receive HFPA's Cecil B. DeMille Award
        * Chef du jour: Love the food you prepare a guide to this chef's success

        * Patrick Cannon defense strategy rare but n...
        * Feds fine Jesse Jackson Jr.'s campaign com...
        * Jesse Jackson Jr. political fund fined nea...
        * Jackson Jr.'s political fund fined nearly ...
        * 'Celebrity Crime Files' Season Three, With...
        * Patrick Cannon defense strategy rare but n...
        * Feds fine Jesse Jackson Jr.'s campaign com...
        * Jesse Jackson Jr. political fund fined nea...
        * Jackson Jr.'s political fund fined nearly ...
        * 'Celebrity Crime Files' Season Three, With...

        * Daily Kos Elections Morning Digest: Americ......
        * Durbin denies ‘bullying’ businesses...
        * Poll: Durbin Leading Oberweis By 23 Points...
        * Poll: Durbin Leading Oberweis By 23 Points...
        * Poll: Durbin Leading Oberweis By 23 Points...

        * ISIS fight: Congress to vote on arming Syr......

        * Man Killed in Gang-related Violence
        * Report: Right-To-Work Laws Strain Public Budgets & Would 'Weaken' Illinois' Economy
        * Tom Tresser, Co-Founder Of The CivicLab, Presenting TIF Information
        * The [Thursday] Papers
        * Common Core Math Standards Add Up To Big Money For Education Companies
        * Group: Drivers Not Stopping For Pedestrians At Crosswalks
        * Recap of Townhall Meeting on "Park Manor Inn Hotel Development on 76th State
        * Polling the polls for November 4; who’s to say if any of them are correct
        * Richard Skoda’s dreams.
        * Anita Alvarez's husband investigated for tax exemptions


        * Governor Quinn, clean house
        * Rauner renews call for Quinn to fire illegal patronage hires
        * Public Betrayal: The Quinn Patronage Scandal Unfolds
        * Sun-Times Report: In Illegal Hiring Scandal, Pat Quinn Protects “Kingmaker” Kin
        * Governor Quinn Announces Clean Water Investments in Stickney and Burbank - Projects Will Modernize Infrastructure, Combat Damaging Floods and Create Jobs




            Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller