SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      Mobile Version     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
Question of the day

Wednesday, Nov 30, 2011

* I guess I should do a question before I return to my sick bed.

The setup, from the Tribune

Mayor Rahm Emanuel has denied requests for public records that might shed light on his decisions to raise vehicle fees and water rates and to legalize speeding camera tickets that could hit drivers with $100 fines.

It’s the latest in a pattern of records denials from the mayor, who proclaimed a new commitment to transparency at City Hall under his leadership.

After Emanuel this fall proposed a series of fee increases to help balance his budget, the Tribune filed requests for any internal City Hall documents to show how Emanuel came up with his plans to charge homeowners and drivers more, including emails, memos and any relevant contacts with outside companies or interests.

To date, the only internal document provided by the city is a PowerPoint demonstration on the need for water rate hikes, which consists mostly of background on the city’s water system. Some slides were removed by the city, which cited a broad exemption for “deliberative materials” under the Freedom of Information Act.

Law Department spokesman Roderick Drew said the city identified about 1,300 relevant emails each for the speed camera and water rate issues, and about 700 emails relevant to the vehicle sticker increases. But the Emanuel administration refused to produce them on the grounds that it would be too much trouble to remove any opinions or deliberations that they say they are allowed to withhold from the public under state law.

* The Question: Was Mayor Emanuel right to reject this FOIA request? Take the poll and then explain your answer in comments, please.

- Posted by Rich Miller        

  1. - Aldyth - Wednesday, Nov 30, 11 @ 9:30 am:

    You are transparent or you are sort of transparent. We have way too much sort of transparent.

  2. - Robert - Wednesday, Nov 30, 11 @ 9:38 am:

    I voted no but hesitated a bit. Sometimes it is more difficult to get to a good outcome if everything has to be disclosed.

  3. - yinn - Wednesday, Nov 30, 11 @ 9:51 am:

    No. Just because they are allowed to withhold doesn’t mean they must withhold (except in certain cases, such as those covered by HIPAA rules). If it’s unduly burdensome they can ask for an extension in filling the request.

  4. - Anonymous - Wednesday, Nov 30, 11 @ 9:52 am:

    According to statute: (5 ILCS 140/1.2)
    Sec. 1.2. Presumption. All records in the custody or possession of a public body are presumed to be open to inspection or copying. Any public body that asserts that a record is exempt from disclosure has the burden of proving by clear and convincing evidence that it is exempt.

    There are exemptions for drafts and a few others that might apply, but unless that “clear and convincing evidence” was provided, the city appears to be in violation of the FOIA.

  5. - Ahoy - Wednesday, Nov 30, 11 @ 9:53 am:

    Voted yes, I think FOIA request are a huge budget and administrative strain on local governments. The law needs to be revamped.

  6. - downstate hack - Wednesday, Nov 30, 11 @ 10:00 am:

    I voted yes, because this request was too broad and without clear reason or intent.

  7. - dupage dan - Wednesday, Nov 30, 11 @ 10:10 am:

    Whose government is it, anyway? Does it belong to Rahm Emanuel or the citizens? Aren’t we just asking for copies of our own documents? Emails?

    I realize that some communications must be kept secret - time of war and all that. Does Rahm beieve he is at war with the citizens of Chicago?

  8. - MrJM - Wednesday, Nov 30, 11 @ 10:10 am:

    Was Mayor Emanuel right to reject this FOIA request?

    No. If Emanuel’s rationale is permitted to stand, any public official with half a brain cell will litter all future emails with “opinions or deliberations” in order to place them outside the scope of FOIA.

    – MrJM

  9. - amalia - Wednesday, Nov 30, 11 @ 10:11 am:

    pathetic way of taking a stand on information. give it up!

  10. - yinn - Wednesday, Nov 30, 11 @ 10:20 am:

    hack, you don’t have to have any reason or “intent” to look at public records. You only have to make it clear whether it’s a commercial request or not.

    Ahoy, put the info online systematically and you won’t have to deal with requests. Problem solved.

  11. - Anonymouse - Wednesday, Nov 30, 11 @ 10:31 am:

    Aldyth- Sort of transparent is called “translucent.”

  12. - Gilkey - Wednesday, Nov 30, 11 @ 10:33 am:

    Meh…I was satisfied with his proclamations.

    I know it is difficult to run the city, so I voted yes.

  13. - Bill - Wednesday, Nov 30, 11 @ 10:50 am:

    Everybody knows that Rahm is above the law…election law, labor law, FOIA law, etc..He can just observe or break any laws he wants because he’s RAHM. Just ask him. I voted no…not that it matters.

  14. - Aristotle - Wednesday, Nov 30, 11 @ 11:01 am:

    New Age - The risk you run when you conduct meetings via email.

  15. - Plutocrat03 - Wednesday, Nov 30, 11 @ 11:03 am:

    Of course the information should be released. “Deliberative materials” seems too vague a term.

    Looks like we see a developing pattern with the new mayor.

    Disturbing? Time will tell.

  16. - Ray del Camino - Wednesday, Nov 30, 11 @ 11:05 am:

    Yes. What Hack said. The Tribune was fishing. Let them ask for something specific. They were interested in the “decision process”? Amateurs.

  17. - Knome Sane - Wednesday, Nov 30, 11 @ 11:12 am:

    You can’t say your administration is transparent and then smear the lens with Vaseline.

  18. - Chicago Cynic - Wednesday, Nov 30, 11 @ 11:19 am:

    I voted no. This was a legitimate inquiry into a very relevant subject matter. The denial is highly reminiscent of Mayor Daley’s FOIA denials on the parking meter fiasco.

    Meet the new boss. Same as the old boss.

  19. - walkinfool - Wednesday, Nov 30, 11 @ 11:28 am:

    I reluctantly voted yes, even though I think Rahm is overstating his position in this case. I support FOIA goals and most current practices.

    There has to be some reasonable exemption for deliberative records, in order for the government to function and solve problems. Many ideas initially discussed in advance of a decision have little or nothing to do with the outcome, and would be misleading to anyone who is primarily interested in the decision or policy. The press is in the business of informing the public, rather than misleading them. If public servants cannot toss around ideas without each one becoming a press/political issue, then no one will discuss anything out of the box at all, before coming up with solutions.

    We do want our government to work, don’t we? Let’s use the FOIA tool in a focused and deliberative way.

  20. - anon sequitor - Wednesday, Nov 30, 11 @ 11:32 am:

    I am in the minority and voted in favor of Rahm’s actions but only reluctantly.

    How can officials reach a legitimate decision if they don’t have debate and input from different points of view? Unfortunately, drawing the line between what is public record or private deliberation, is a very fuzzy line.

    Plus, in our new “gotcha” world of politics, anything you do (or anyone you talk to) can be twisted into something nefarious.

    The groups who complain about undue influence, are usually the groups who lost. To them, special interests are the opposing groups who won. Let’s not forget that even do-gooders contribute to political campaigns. Are they buying a vote, or just supporting someone whose views they agree with?

  21. - King Louis XVI - Wednesday, Nov 30, 11 @ 11:41 am:

    Emanuel is just like Quinn: just another transparency phony.

  22. - dupage dan - Wednesday, Nov 30, 11 @ 11:45 am:

    =Ahoy, put the info online systematically and you won’t have to deal with requests. Problem solved.=


  23. - Ahoy - Wednesday, Nov 30, 11 @ 11:46 am:


    –Ahoy, put the info online systematically and you won’t have to deal with requests. Problem solved.–

    So who’s going to go through all public (and now private) emails to delete private information and put them on line? Furthermore, who’s going to pay the people that you will need to do that?

    That seems ridiculous. I agree with putting reports and other information online, but in the context of this story, it’s a horrible idea.

  24. - Cincinnatus - Wednesday, Nov 30, 11 @ 11:46 am:

    Isn’t the real question why Rahm is not releasing the data?

  25. - Oswego Willy - Wednesday, Nov 30, 11 @ 12:11 pm:

    I voted yes and this is why.

    Making of the sausage is ugly and sometimes icky. Policy (and a budget is policy and how mony is raised and spent to porpel that policy) is sometimes about half-baked ideas, with a dash of rational thought, and a pinch of compromise. If we see all the private “give and take” and private thoughts, why would any policy maker, alderman, or adviser want to give anything to the mayor that can be drudged up in an overreaching FOI at any timme. All, the word “all” makes me vote “yes”, but if there are drafts, without “red marks”, “notes/memos”, or “scribble notes”, I can be for that.

  26. - JakeCP - Wednesday, Nov 30, 11 @ 12:26 pm:

    He shouldn’t withhold any information. We pay his salary.

  27. - Left Leaner - Wednesday, Nov 30, 11 @ 12:45 pm:

    Voted no. You talked the talk, now walk it. Lame reasoning. Although agree that FOIA requests can be a hard burden to government and the law needs revised, largely to provide funding to improve the efficiency of the FOIA request process.

  28. - Wensicia - Wednesday, Nov 30, 11 @ 12:53 pm:

    ==But the Emanuel administration refused to produce them on the grounds that it would be too much trouble to remove any opinions or deliberations that they say they are allowed to withhold from the public under state law.==

    Doesn’t the mayor employ a legal team at taxpayer expense just for these purposes?

    Any politician who claims he’ll be for more transparency once elected is lying, the only transparency going on here.

  29. - Justice - Wednesday, Nov 30, 11 @ 12:53 pm:

    He should honor the requests, completely.

    In the future require that all business transactions, correspondence or phone calls be done on city owned equipment…no exceptions.

    Any good IT person can track his texts and tweets, present and past. Closed meetings (ignoring the open meetings act) might be a bit more difficult, but likely some in those meetings are wearing wires anyway.

  30. - Objective Dem - Wednesday, Nov 30, 11 @ 12:55 pm:

    My understanding is “draft” materials are not subject to FOIA so technically he was right. Providing them to the papers would set a precedent and the papers will keep requesting deliberative materials. This will be time-consuming and ultimately for what purpose? The papers will looking for something they can take out of context and play up in order to sell papers.

  31. - In 630 - Wednesday, Nov 30, 11 @ 1:16 pm:

    Seems like this stuff probably fits within the draft/deliberation exception. That exception exists for a reason- staff and officials need to be able to consider and explore things in an unfettered way. Start making everything public and you get every non-starter bad idea that ever got explored trumpted by someone and your administrators get even less creative in their approaches to issues than they already are.

  32. - Carl Nyberg - Wednesday, Nov 30, 11 @ 1:34 pm:

    Does the Illinois FOIA law have a “too much trouble” exception?

    This seems to be a willful violation of the law that should be a crime.

    It’s one thing to stretch an exception. But to create an exception of “too much trouble” is absurd. Guess what? It’s always “too much trouble” to comply with FOIA laws when the information reflects badly on the officials in questions.

  33. - Hi - Wednesday, Nov 30, 11 @ 2:03 pm:

    This is the guy who came in with his transparency pledge just like Rod came in as a reformer.

  34. - Anonymous - Wednesday, Nov 30, 11 @ 2:38 pm:

    If it’s public business on the taxpayers dime; it’s public info. No different than the ‘personal cell phone’ stuff. Public business is the public’s business.

  35. - TwoFeetThick - Wednesday, Nov 30, 11 @ 3:15 pm:

    I voted yes. While I’m all for transparency, it is obvious from the posters on FOIA-related threads here that those commenters who do not/have never worked in government and FOIA have no clue how difficult it can be to comply with some FOIA requests. This stuff doesn’t just magically appear in a nicely wrapped bundle, ready to be sent off to whoever wants it. It has to be located, perhaps redacted (you wouldn’t want YOUR social security or account numbers released to someone, would you?), documented, etc. It takes time and manpower and, therefore, money, to do. The law is terribly written, contradicts itself and makes an assumption that if someone is asking an agency for something, that agency actually HAS the item being sought (which is often not the case - does that mean the agency is denying the request because they don’t have the item and, therefore, can’t comply? Beats me. The law is silent on what to do when that happens.).

    Requestors often have no idea what they specifically want, but are just going fishing, or they don’t know what the item they want is called, so the person attempting to comply must surmise what they want. Or they’re prisoners and just looking to be a pain in someone’s butt because it’s one of the few things they can do.

    Of course, any attempt by the GA to fix these problems would be blasted by the media as shutting down government openness, so it’s easier and politically safer to just leave it the mess that it is.

  36. - Lefty Lefty - Wednesday, Nov 30, 11 @ 3:21 pm:

    Blanket denial of FOIA requests is clearly against the law. “We’re too busy” is not an allowable excuse. More BS from a BSer.

  37. - Demoralized - Wednesday, Nov 30, 11 @ 3:56 pm:

    I voted yes. I’m not sure what is even being requested. They raised the rates. Period. End of story.

  38. - mokenavince - Wednesday, Nov 30, 11 @ 4:36 pm:

    I voted yes because it all comes out in the wash.

  39. - Patrick McDonough - Wednesday, Nov 30, 11 @ 5:13 pm:

    I have fought with Gary Litherland (Chicago Department of Water Management) to release information for years. Tom Laporte, his boss, does not even return calls. Every request requires a extra time extension which is used to kill stories. In fact, complaints from myself and other have been made to the Office of the Inspector General, nothing is done. Oh well.

  40. - Fed up - Wednesday, Nov 30, 11 @ 6:23 pm:

    No but nothing will happen to emperor Rahm he will be allowed to do as he pleases.

  41. - PublicServant - Wednesday, Nov 30, 11 @ 7:24 pm:

    Rahm’s honeymoon is over. Once those fees on the middle class start impacting citizens, he’s toast. Most of those citiizens aren’t in unions, so, if there’s no bad guy for Rahm to rescue us from, then he becomes the bad guy. As I said, honeymoon over. Move over Kim Kardashian.

  42. - I have issues - Wednesday, Nov 30, 11 @ 7:42 pm:

    Well, Patrick, i feel for you, but the City I.G. has always been a joke. Was in for an interview about something years ago, stupid investigation, asked me a bunch of stuff that had no relevance on the whole thing.

    I voted no, even though I do believe the FOIA has gone too far. Voted no mainly because since Rahm made this such a big issue, well, time to follow up Mayor!

    When you make “transperancy” an issue, they will always want more. Rahm will be only as transperant as he wants to be!

  43. - Justin Boland - Wednesday, Nov 30, 11 @ 8:04 pm:

    Hopefully it’s obvious by now that “transparency” is just more empty rhetoric. Lies, lies and lies. Then, more lies.

  44. - DuPage Dave - Wednesday, Nov 30, 11 @ 8:15 pm:

    Emmanuel is beginning to look like Blagojevich here. Blago promised reform, but it was only a promise without reform. Rahm is promising transparency, and it appears also to be only a promise.

    The only thing here that’s transparent is his attempt at hiding his records.

    New Rahm theme song = “I’m Looking Through You”??

  45. - Dirty Red - Tuesday, Dec 6, 11 @ 10:23 am:

    Completely agree with Anon @9:52. It saddens me that so many City Clerks, and now City Attorneys, look at public records in another light.

    Ahoy, get over it. FOIA was just overhauled in a big way that gives local governments more time and more reasons to say, “No,” plus charge people who request more often.

    If a local government is really THAT swamped with FOIA requests, then my first thought is that they aren’t providing people with as much information as they could at the local library, City Clerk’s office, or Web site. If you take the time to set-up an IT infrastructure so that some government documents are automatically made available, I’d be willing to bet you’d see fewer FOIA requests.

Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.

* Happy Thanksgiving!
* *** UPDATED x1 *** Five unanswered questions
* *** UPDATED x1 *** Question of the day
* Caption contest!
* Crossing the line
* Moody's warns Illinois
* The Credit Union Difference
* *** UPDATED x1 - Franks responds *** Uh-oh
* Then and now
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today's edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)
* Yesterday's blog posts

Visit our advertisers...







Search This Blog...

Search the 98th General Assembly By Bill Number
(example: HB0001)

Search the 98th General Assembly By Keyword

* Verizon’s go90 streaming service now has its first original series
* Samsung Galaxy A7 hits TENAA as model number SM-A7100
* Google Play’s Cyber Weekend promotion really has something for everyone
* Collect all your favorite characters in ‘Star Wars: Galaxy of Heroes’
* Facebook Announces tvOS SDK With Login Support
* Apple Pay strikes agreement with China’s bank card organization, UnionPay
* Software update for Nest Thermostats will make them even more energy efficient

* White Sox program provides kids real chance
* Johnson solid candidate for White Sox rotation
* White Sox sign catcher Avila to one-year deal
* White Sox sign catcher Avila to one-year deal
* White Sox sign catcher Avila to one-year deal
* White Sox sign C Alex Avila for 1 year, $2.5 million
* White Sox sign catcher Avila to one-year deal


Main Menu
Pundit rankings
Subscriber Content
Blagojevich Trial
Updated Posts

November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005


RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0


* Rauner Pardons Man Found Innocent of 1999 Attac.....
* Governor Issues Pardons In 2 Jefferson and 1 Fa.....
* Illinois makes tax break deals with three compa.....
* New United States bill would tighten refugee ve.....
* The quiet evolution in Springfield - Chicago Tr.....

* Rauner pardons man found innocent of 1999 attack
* Springfield police chief bemoans body-cam 'burden'
* Illinois makes tax break deals with 3 companies
* Most Illinois metro jobless rates fall but many lose jobs
* EXCHANGE: Fire training buildings adapt to versatile needs
* Amtrak ramps up service, offers tips for holiday travel
* Bishop Hill Museum acquires early painting by folk artist
* State treasurer to hold online auction of unclaimed property
* Man gets 16 years for sexually assaulting a woman he knew
* U of Illinois group looking for chancellor led by professor

* Rauner pardons man found innocent of 1999 attack
* Springfield jobless rate falls again, to 5.1 percent
* Springfield police chief sees problems with body cam law
* Lawsuit challenges Illinois ban on marijuana campaign money
* Number of Illinois inmates released on parole climbing
* Bryce Benton circulating petitions to challenge Sen. Sam McCann in GOP primary
* Executive Mansion roof repairs nearing completion
* Candidates begin filing petitions for March primary election
* Benton circulating petitions to challenge McCann in GOP primary
* Rauner administration says House Democrats holding local aid hostage

* Review: Sociale in the South Loop
* Her Barbie was a lawyer. Now she defends victims' rights
* Meet the guy making money off your food scraps
* United, Delta bet on long oil slump
* United offers pilots 13% raise

* Four more Laquan McDonald police dashcam videos released
* President Obama: ‘Disturbed’ by Laquan video, grateful for ‘peaceful’ protests
* Black leaders call for Supt. McCarthy to resign
* Viktor Tikhonov embraces off-ice role as Artemi Panarin’s guide
* Ex-Hawks winger Ben Smith working his way back from a concussion
* FOP posts notice on raising bail for officer charged with murder
* Brian Bliss remains employed by Fire
* Black Caucus renews calls for McCarthy’s ouster
* Reasons Blackhawks fans should be thankfull
* Mitchell: “Hideous” video tells an even more hideous story

* Four new Laquan McDonald shooting videos raise more questions
* Calls for reform after McDonald video release; protesters march in Loop
* Man charged with home invasion after woman reported taken from Oak Park house
* Questions remain on long inquiry before Laquan McDonald shooting charges
* Police: Two girls struck by SUV while walking on sidewalk
* 3 injured in separate South, West and Northwest Side shootings
* Indiana's proposed new religious freedom plan draws ire
* Charges dropped against protest leader accused of striking cop during Loop march
* Gov. Rauner grants clemency to 10, denies 200
* CPS reverses course on special education cuts, will spend more

* George Will: Muzzling pet advice another case of free speech erosion
* Bernard Schoenburg: Josh Langfelder took father's advice on election petition signatures
* Rauner pardons man found innocent of 1999 attack
* Springfield jobless rate falls again, to 5.1 percent
* Michael Gerson: The Trump effect, still 'understated'
* Catherine Rampell: For millennials, first comes love — then what?
* Springfield police chief sees problems with body cam law
* Lawsuit challenges Illinois ban on marijuana campaign money
* Number of Illinois inmates released on parole climbing
* Lawsuit challenges Illinois ban on marijuana campaign money

* Illini swept again by Nebaska
* Cubit planning ahead
* PODCAST: Sports Talk 11-25-15
* Asmussen's Huddle Up: Michigan State feeling good
* PODCAST: Celestina Savonius-Wroth, U of I Library
* Ex-Rockets: Relish experience
* Arcola's Hutton takes care of business
* Updated: Danville teen killed, 3 hurt, in Indiana crash
* The Health Reporter Is In: Nov. 25, 2015
* Danville teen killed, 3 hurt, in Indiana crash

* Metea Valley turns the tables on St. Charles North
* Price exits after 2 periods but Canadiens beat Rangers 5-1
* New videos show Chicago cop pursuing teen before shooting
* Confident Hubly (32 points) lifts Elk Grove past Warren
* Predators end record scoring drought, beat Sabres 3-2

* House lawmakers overcome hurdle on key tra...
* Rodney Davis talks funding with Bloomingto...
* The agency that fought Illiana gets a new ...
* Rep. Dold takes educational cruise down Ch...
* Lawmakers decry high turnover rate of VA h...
* CBD Oil, and politics
* Simon considering state Senate bid
* Killer Congressman Tom MacArthur trying to...
* Shutdown? State may not notice
* Rep. Bob Dold

* Nebraska ethanol producers name former Dur......

* Opinion: Sen. Kirk must stand with crimina......
* Kirk co-authors Government Transformation ......

* Laquan McDonald.
* Sixteen shots. The story that broke the silence.
* Thomas Francis McGuire interviewed on NTNM
* Random thoughts.
* Prosecutors drop charges against Malcolm London.
* Lawless: The Obama Administration’s Unprecedented Assault on the Constitution and the Rule of Law
* Thanksgiving by the numbers
* IAR offices closed Thursday and Friday for Thanksgiving holiday
* Charter expansion. Where is the IEA?
* Courtenay School Clothing & Toy Drive Underway

* Emergency Management Officials, National Weather Service Encourage Winter Preparedness - November is Winter Weather Preparedness Month in Illinois
* Keep Your Family Safe This Winter - November through February are leading months for carbon monoxide related incidents
* Governor Takes Bill Action
* Illinois Department of Labor Director Hugo Chaviano Awards Governor’s Award for Contributions in Health and Safety to the Illinois Refining Division of Marathon Petroleum Company LP
* State Regulator Elected Treasurer of Interstate Medical Licensure Compact

    Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller