SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      Mobile Version     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact
CapitolFax.com
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
Question of the day

Wednesday, Nov 30, 2011

* I guess I should do a question before I return to my sick bed.

The setup, from the Tribune

Mayor Rahm Emanuel has denied requests for public records that might shed light on his decisions to raise vehicle fees and water rates and to legalize speeding camera tickets that could hit drivers with $100 fines.

It’s the latest in a pattern of records denials from the mayor, who proclaimed a new commitment to transparency at City Hall under his leadership.

After Emanuel this fall proposed a series of fee increases to help balance his budget, the Tribune filed requests for any internal City Hall documents to show how Emanuel came up with his plans to charge homeowners and drivers more, including emails, memos and any relevant contacts with outside companies or interests.

To date, the only internal document provided by the city is a PowerPoint demonstration on the need for water rate hikes, which consists mostly of background on the city’s water system. Some slides were removed by the city, which cited a broad exemption for “deliberative materials” under the Freedom of Information Act.

Law Department spokesman Roderick Drew said the city identified about 1,300 relevant emails each for the speed camera and water rate issues, and about 700 emails relevant to the vehicle sticker increases. But the Emanuel administration refused to produce them on the grounds that it would be too much trouble to remove any opinions or deliberations that they say they are allowed to withhold from the public under state law.

* The Question: Was Mayor Emanuel right to reject this FOIA request? Take the poll and then explain your answer in comments, please.


- Posted by Rich Miller        


45 Comments
  1. - Aldyth - Wednesday, Nov 30, 11 @ 9:30 am:

    You are transparent or you are sort of transparent. We have way too much sort of transparent.


  2. - Robert - Wednesday, Nov 30, 11 @ 9:38 am:

    I voted no but hesitated a bit. Sometimes it is more difficult to get to a good outcome if everything has to be disclosed.


  3. - yinn - Wednesday, Nov 30, 11 @ 9:51 am:

    No. Just because they are allowed to withhold doesn’t mean they must withhold (except in certain cases, such as those covered by HIPAA rules). If it’s unduly burdensome they can ask for an extension in filling the request.


  4. - Anonymous - Wednesday, Nov 30, 11 @ 9:52 am:

    According to statute: (5 ILCS 140/1.2)
    Sec. 1.2. Presumption. All records in the custody or possession of a public body are presumed to be open to inspection or copying. Any public body that asserts that a record is exempt from disclosure has the burden of proving by clear and convincing evidence that it is exempt.

    There are exemptions for drafts and a few others that might apply, but unless that “clear and convincing evidence” was provided, the city appears to be in violation of the FOIA.


  5. - Ahoy - Wednesday, Nov 30, 11 @ 9:53 am:

    Voted yes, I think FOIA request are a huge budget and administrative strain on local governments. The law needs to be revamped.


  6. - downstate hack - Wednesday, Nov 30, 11 @ 10:00 am:

    I voted yes, because this request was too broad and without clear reason or intent.


  7. - dupage dan - Wednesday, Nov 30, 11 @ 10:10 am:

    Whose government is it, anyway? Does it belong to Rahm Emanuel or the citizens? Aren’t we just asking for copies of our own documents? Emails?

    I realize that some communications must be kept secret - time of war and all that. Does Rahm beieve he is at war with the citizens of Chicago?


  8. - MrJM - Wednesday, Nov 30, 11 @ 10:10 am:

    Was Mayor Emanuel right to reject this FOIA request?

    No. If Emanuel’s rationale is permitted to stand, any public official with half a brain cell will litter all future emails with “opinions or deliberations” in order to place them outside the scope of FOIA.

    – MrJM


  9. - amalia - Wednesday, Nov 30, 11 @ 10:11 am:

    pathetic way of taking a stand on information. give it up!


  10. - yinn - Wednesday, Nov 30, 11 @ 10:20 am:

    hack, you don’t have to have any reason or “intent” to look at public records. You only have to make it clear whether it’s a commercial request or not.

    Ahoy, put the info online systematically and you won’t have to deal with requests. Problem solved.


  11. - Anonymouse - Wednesday, Nov 30, 11 @ 10:31 am:

    Aldyth- Sort of transparent is called “translucent.”


  12. - Gilkey - Wednesday, Nov 30, 11 @ 10:33 am:

    Meh…I was satisfied with his proclamations.

    I know it is difficult to run the city, so I voted yes.


  13. - Bill - Wednesday, Nov 30, 11 @ 10:50 am:

    Everybody knows that Rahm is above the law…election law, labor law, FOIA law, etc..He can just observe or break any laws he wants because he’s RAHM. Just ask him. I voted no…not that it matters.


  14. - Aristotle - Wednesday, Nov 30, 11 @ 11:01 am:

    New Age - The risk you run when you conduct meetings via email.


  15. - Plutocrat03 - Wednesday, Nov 30, 11 @ 11:03 am:

    Of course the information should be released. “Deliberative materials” seems too vague a term.

    Looks like we see a developing pattern with the new mayor.

    Disturbing? Time will tell.


  16. - Ray del Camino - Wednesday, Nov 30, 11 @ 11:05 am:

    Yes. What Hack said. The Tribune was fishing. Let them ask for something specific. They were interested in the “decision process”? Amateurs.


  17. - Knome Sane - Wednesday, Nov 30, 11 @ 11:12 am:

    You can’t say your administration is transparent and then smear the lens with Vaseline.


  18. - Chicago Cynic - Wednesday, Nov 30, 11 @ 11:19 am:

    I voted no. This was a legitimate inquiry into a very relevant subject matter. The denial is highly reminiscent of Mayor Daley’s FOIA denials on the parking meter fiasco.

    Meet the new boss. Same as the old boss.


  19. - walkinfool - Wednesday, Nov 30, 11 @ 11:28 am:

    I reluctantly voted yes, even though I think Rahm is overstating his position in this case. I support FOIA goals and most current practices.

    There has to be some reasonable exemption for deliberative records, in order for the government to function and solve problems. Many ideas initially discussed in advance of a decision have little or nothing to do with the outcome, and would be misleading to anyone who is primarily interested in the decision or policy. The press is in the business of informing the public, rather than misleading them. If public servants cannot toss around ideas without each one becoming a press/political issue, then no one will discuss anything out of the box at all, before coming up with solutions.

    We do want our government to work, don’t we? Let’s use the FOIA tool in a focused and deliberative way.


  20. - anon sequitor - Wednesday, Nov 30, 11 @ 11:32 am:

    I am in the minority and voted in favor of Rahm’s actions but only reluctantly.

    How can officials reach a legitimate decision if they don’t have debate and input from different points of view? Unfortunately, drawing the line between what is public record or private deliberation, is a very fuzzy line.

    Plus, in our new “gotcha” world of politics, anything you do (or anyone you talk to) can be twisted into something nefarious.

    The groups who complain about undue influence, are usually the groups who lost. To them, special interests are the opposing groups who won. Let’s not forget that even do-gooders contribute to political campaigns. Are they buying a vote, or just supporting someone whose views they agree with?


  21. - King Louis XVI - Wednesday, Nov 30, 11 @ 11:41 am:

    Emanuel is just like Quinn: just another transparency phony.


  22. - dupage dan - Wednesday, Nov 30, 11 @ 11:45 am:

    =Ahoy, put the info online systematically and you won’t have to deal with requests. Problem solved.=

    Exactly.


  23. - Ahoy - Wednesday, Nov 30, 11 @ 11:46 am:

    Yinn,

    –Ahoy, put the info online systematically and you won’t have to deal with requests. Problem solved.–

    So who’s going to go through all public (and now private) emails to delete private information and put them on line? Furthermore, who’s going to pay the people that you will need to do that?

    That seems ridiculous. I agree with putting reports and other information online, but in the context of this story, it’s a horrible idea.


  24. - Cincinnatus - Wednesday, Nov 30, 11 @ 11:46 am:

    Isn’t the real question why Rahm is not releasing the data?


  25. - Oswego Willy - Wednesday, Nov 30, 11 @ 12:11 pm:

    I voted yes and this is why.

    Making of the sausage is ugly and sometimes icky. Policy (and a budget is policy and how mony is raised and spent to porpel that policy) is sometimes about half-baked ideas, with a dash of rational thought, and a pinch of compromise. If we see all the private “give and take” and private thoughts, why would any policy maker, alderman, or adviser want to give anything to the mayor that can be drudged up in an overreaching FOI at any timme. All, the word “all” makes me vote “yes”, but if there are drafts, without “red marks”, “notes/memos”, or “scribble notes”, I can be for that.


  26. - JakeCP - Wednesday, Nov 30, 11 @ 12:26 pm:

    He shouldn’t withhold any information. We pay his salary.


  27. - Left Leaner - Wednesday, Nov 30, 11 @ 12:45 pm:

    Voted no. You talked the talk, now walk it. Lame reasoning. Although agree that FOIA requests can be a hard burden to government and the law needs revised, largely to provide funding to improve the efficiency of the FOIA request process.


  28. - Wensicia - Wednesday, Nov 30, 11 @ 12:53 pm:

    ==But the Emanuel administration refused to produce them on the grounds that it would be too much trouble to remove any opinions or deliberations that they say they are allowed to withhold from the public under state law.==

    Doesn’t the mayor employ a legal team at taxpayer expense just for these purposes?

    Any politician who claims he’ll be for more transparency once elected is lying, the only transparency going on here.


  29. - Justice - Wednesday, Nov 30, 11 @ 12:53 pm:

    He should honor the requests, completely.

    In the future require that all business transactions, correspondence or phone calls be done on city owned equipment…no exceptions.

    Any good IT person can track his texts and tweets, present and past. Closed meetings (ignoring the open meetings act) might be a bit more difficult, but likely some in those meetings are wearing wires anyway.


  30. - Objective Dem - Wednesday, Nov 30, 11 @ 12:55 pm:

    My understanding is “draft” materials are not subject to FOIA so technically he was right. Providing them to the papers would set a precedent and the papers will keep requesting deliberative materials. This will be time-consuming and ultimately for what purpose? The papers will looking for something they can take out of context and play up in order to sell papers.


  31. - In 630 - Wednesday, Nov 30, 11 @ 1:16 pm:

    Seems like this stuff probably fits within the draft/deliberation exception. That exception exists for a reason- staff and officials need to be able to consider and explore things in an unfettered way. Start making everything public and you get every non-starter bad idea that ever got explored trumpted by someone and your administrators get even less creative in their approaches to issues than they already are.


  32. - Carl Nyberg - Wednesday, Nov 30, 11 @ 1:34 pm:

    Does the Illinois FOIA law have a “too much trouble” exception?

    This seems to be a willful violation of the law that should be a crime.

    It’s one thing to stretch an exception. But to create an exception of “too much trouble” is absurd. Guess what? It’s always “too much trouble” to comply with FOIA laws when the information reflects badly on the officials in questions.


  33. - Hi - Wednesday, Nov 30, 11 @ 2:03 pm:

    This is the guy who came in with his transparency pledge just like Rod came in as a reformer.


  34. - Anonymous - Wednesday, Nov 30, 11 @ 2:38 pm:

    If it’s public business on the taxpayers dime; it’s public info. No different than the ‘personal cell phone’ stuff. Public business is the public’s business.


  35. - TwoFeetThick - Wednesday, Nov 30, 11 @ 3:15 pm:

    I voted yes. While I’m all for transparency, it is obvious from the posters on FOIA-related threads here that those commenters who do not/have never worked in government and FOIA have no clue how difficult it can be to comply with some FOIA requests. This stuff doesn’t just magically appear in a nicely wrapped bundle, ready to be sent off to whoever wants it. It has to be located, perhaps redacted (you wouldn’t want YOUR social security or account numbers released to someone, would you?), documented, etc. It takes time and manpower and, therefore, money, to do. The law is terribly written, contradicts itself and makes an assumption that if someone is asking an agency for something, that agency actually HAS the item being sought (which is often not the case - does that mean the agency is denying the request because they don’t have the item and, therefore, can’t comply? Beats me. The law is silent on what to do when that happens.).

    Requestors often have no idea what they specifically want, but are just going fishing, or they don’t know what the item they want is called, so the person attempting to comply must surmise what they want. Or they’re prisoners and just looking to be a pain in someone’s butt because it’s one of the few things they can do.

    Of course, any attempt by the GA to fix these problems would be blasted by the media as shutting down government openness, so it’s easier and politically safer to just leave it the mess that it is.


  36. - Lefty Lefty - Wednesday, Nov 30, 11 @ 3:21 pm:

    Blanket denial of FOIA requests is clearly against the law. “We’re too busy” is not an allowable excuse. More BS from a BSer.


  37. - Demoralized - Wednesday, Nov 30, 11 @ 3:56 pm:

    I voted yes. I’m not sure what is even being requested. They raised the rates. Period. End of story.


  38. - mokenavince - Wednesday, Nov 30, 11 @ 4:36 pm:

    I voted yes because it all comes out in the wash.


  39. - Patrick McDonough - Wednesday, Nov 30, 11 @ 5:13 pm:

    I have fought with Gary Litherland (Chicago Department of Water Management) to release information for years. Tom Laporte, his boss, does not even return calls. Every request requires a extra time extension which is used to kill stories. In fact, complaints from myself and other have been made to the Office of the Inspector General, nothing is done. Oh well.


  40. - Fed up - Wednesday, Nov 30, 11 @ 6:23 pm:

    No but nothing will happen to emperor Rahm he will be allowed to do as he pleases.


  41. - PublicServant - Wednesday, Nov 30, 11 @ 7:24 pm:

    Rahm’s honeymoon is over. Once those fees on the middle class start impacting citizens, he’s toast. Most of those citiizens aren’t in unions, so, if there’s no bad guy for Rahm to rescue us from, then he becomes the bad guy. As I said, honeymoon over. Move over Kim Kardashian.


  42. - I have issues - Wednesday, Nov 30, 11 @ 7:42 pm:

    Well, Patrick, i feel for you, but the City I.G. has always been a joke. Was in for an interview about something years ago, stupid investigation, asked me a bunch of stuff that had no relevance on the whole thing.

    I voted no, even though I do believe the FOIA has gone too far. Voted no mainly because since Rahm made this such a big issue, well, time to follow up Mayor!

    When you make “transperancy” an issue, they will always want more. Rahm will be only as transperant as he wants to be!


  43. - Justin Boland - Wednesday, Nov 30, 11 @ 8:04 pm:

    Hopefully it’s obvious by now that “transparency” is just more empty rhetoric. Lies, lies and lies. Then, more lies.


  44. - DuPage Dave - Wednesday, Nov 30, 11 @ 8:15 pm:

    Emmanuel is beginning to look like Blagojevich here. Blago promised reform, but it was only a promise without reform. Rahm is promising transparency, and it appears also to be only a promise.

    The only thing here that’s transparent is his attempt at hiding his records.

    New Rahm theme song = “I’m Looking Through You”??


  45. - Dirty Red - Tuesday, Dec 6, 11 @ 10:23 am:

    Completely agree with Anon @9:52. It saddens me that so many City Clerks, and now City Attorneys, look at public records in another light.

    Ahoy, get over it. FOIA was just overhauled in a big way that gives local governments more time and more reasons to say, “No,” plus charge people who request more often.

    If a local government is really THAT swamped with FOIA requests, then my first thought is that they aren’t providing people with as much information as they could at the local library, City Clerk’s office, or Web site. If you take the time to set-up an IT infrastructure so that some government documents are automatically made available, I’d be willing to bet you’d see fewer FOIA requests.


Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.


* Reader comments closed for the weekend
* Question of the day
* *** UPDATED x1 - Rauner response *** This just in... Illinois Supreme Court denies Rauner appeal
* They need a rich "white knight"
* Johnson finally backs Davis... So does Joan
* Schneider throws Quinn under the bus
* Wincing before the hit
* Inspector general's IDOT probe places no direct blame on Quinn
* Today's number: 57 percent
* *** UPDATED x2 - Not totally clean - Some questions answered *** Stories raise unanswered questions about IDOC policy
* *** UPDATED x1 - Schneider campaign responds *** US, Illinois Chambers launch TV hit on Schneider
* Reaching into the past for today's gotcha moment
* New DGA YouTube video ties Rauner to Romney via outsourcing
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Supplement to today’s edition
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today's edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)
* This just in... Unions file motion to "gut" the state's pension case
* Yesterday's blog posts

Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...

...............

...............


Search This Blog...

Search the 98th General Assembly By Bill Number
(example: HB0001)

Search the 98th General Assembly By Keyword

          
        * Guess which smartphone took these photos (Vol. 6) (Update: answer within!)
        * Three fun things to do with the Xiaomi Mi4 (Video)
        * For The First Time, The Majority Of Opera Software’s Revenue Came From Mobile Ads
        * Mobile Verification Service Zumigo Closes $6 Million Series B Round Led By Intel Capital
        * HTC One M8 for Windows, edge-free AQUOS Crystal, Moto “Quark” & more | Pocketnow Weekly 110
        * Samsung reminds us why we love handwriting in Note 4 teaser
        * Moto X+1 new material options pick up retailer support

        * Cricket Offers $100 To T-Mobile & MetroPCS Customers To Switch Carriers
        * Alleged Moto X+1, New Moto G Specs Revealed By Retailer
        * Samsung Galaxy Note 4 Teaser Video Released
        * HTC Tablet Certified By WiFi Alliance
        * Project Ara To Get New Rockchip SoC
        * BlackBerry Promotes BBM In Wake Of iMessage Spam Issues
        * SpaceX Test Rocket Fails in Texas Flight

        * Replay confirms play at plate; Yanks nail runner
        * Abreu happy to see fellow Cuban Castillo in bigs
        * Konerko hopes Beckham blossoms with Angels
        * White Sox recall infield prospect Sanchez
        * Will Carlos Sanchez be better than Gordon Beckham?
        * White Sox recall infield prospect Sanchez
        * Ruminations on the end of the Gordon Beckham era


        Main Menu
        Home
        Illinois
        YouTube
        Pundit rankings
        Obama
        Subscriber Content
        Durbin
        Burris
        Blagojevich Trial
        Advertising
        Updated Posts
        Polls

        Archives
        August 2014
        July 2014
        June 2014
        May 2014
        April 2014
        March 2014
        February 2014
        January 2014
        December 2013
        November 2013
        October 2013
        September 2013
        August 2013
        July 2013
        June 2013
        May 2013
        April 2013
        March 2013
        February 2013
        January 2013
        December 2012
        November 2012
        October 2012
        September 2012
        August 2012
        July 2012
        June 2012
        May 2012
        April 2012
        March 2012
        February 2012
        January 2012
        December 2011
        November 2011
        October 2011
        September 2011
        August 2011
        July 2011
        June 2011
        May 2011
        April 2011
        March 2011
        February 2011
        January 2011
        December 2010
        November 2010
        October 2010
        September 2010
        August 2010
        July 2010
        June 2010
        May 2010
        April 2010
        March 2010
        February 2010
        January 2010
        December 2009
        November 2009
        October 2009
        September 2009
        August 2009
        July 2009
        June 2009
        May 2009
        April 2009
        March 2009
        February 2009
        January 2009
        December 2008
        November 2008
        October 2008
        September 2008
        August 2008
        July 2008
        June 2008
        May 2008
        April 2008
        March 2008
        February 2008
        January 2008
        December 2007
        November 2007
        October 2007
        September 2007
        August 2007
        July 2007
        June 2007
        May 2007
        April 2007
        March 2007
        February 2007
        January 2007
        December 2006
        November 2006
        October 2006
        September 2006
        August 2006
        July 2006
        June 2006
        May 2006
        April 2006
        March 2006
        February 2006
        January 2006
        December 2005
        April 2005
        March 2005
        February 2005
        January 2005
        December 2004
        November 2004
        October 2004

        Blog*Spot Archives
        November 2005
        October 2005
        September 2005
        August 2005
        July 2005
        June 2005
        May 2005

        Syndication

        RSS Feed 2.0
        Comments RSS 2.0
        WordPress

        Loading


        * IDOT hiring abuses report critical of Gov. Quin.....
        * Gov. Quinn to announce park grants in Forest Pa.....
        * Gov. Chris Christie..


        * Rauner dealt double blows over Illinois ballot
        * 8 gang members indicted on racketeering charges
        * Church cautions schools on ice bucket challenge
        * Rauner says Board of Election action a Quinn win
        * 2 parolees charged in suburban Chicago standoff
        * Supreme Court won't take up term limits appeal
        * Cardinal George to get experimental cancer drug
        * Report: State agency broke hiring rules for years
        * Sen. Warren disavows PAC urging run for president
        * United flight to Chicago makes emergency landing

        * State employee unions want expedited ruling in pensions suit
        * November ballot certified without term limits question
        * Supreme Court won't take up term limits appeal
        * Rauner dealt double blows over Illinois ballot
        * IDOT broke hiring rules for years, report finds
        * State Rep. Poe faces 3-week stem cell procedure in Texas
        * IDOT cuts positions following questions on hiring
        * Authorities investigating powdery substance at Illinois State Library
        * Powdery substance mailed to Illinois State Library deemed non-hazardous
        * Term-limit backers seek Supreme Court intervention

        * McDonald's testing mozzarella sticks with marinara sauce
        * Watch where Michael Madigan tries to boost turnout
        * Supreme Court spikes term limits appeal
        * IDOT broke hiring rules for years, state report says
        * Cardinal George to get experimental cancer drug


        * IDOT political hiring is setback for Quinn
        * Kids pay the price for weak oversight of charter schools
        * Prosecutor: Harvey hostages threatened, one woman sexually assaulted
        * Attorney indicted on charges of soliciting perjury in drug case
        * Cardinal George to participate in research trial of new cancer drug
        * Eight accused of racketeering, drug-running in Indiana
        * Plan Commission approves year-round sports complex in Pullman
        * Second site added; fans also can gather in Loop to watch Little League World Series game
        * Bond set for men charged in Harvey standoff
        * Jackie Robinson fans erupt in cheers: ‘These boys have rejuvenated us all’


        * Boy shot inside residence on West Side
        * Jackson Jr.'s political fund fined nearly $18,000 for missing reports
        * Cops: Tracking device leads officers to phone store robbery suspects
        * Libertarian Party remains on Illinois ballot this fall
        * Rauner term limits question won't appear on November ballot
        * Ex-cop could face prison for violating probation
        * Cardinal George testing new cancer drug
        * 2nd charge in Antioch inappropriate touching case
        * Heavy rain shuts down Eisenhower for third time this summer
        * U. of I. defends pulling job offer over tweets critical of Israel


        * IL Supreme Court Won't Hear Term Limit Question Before Ballot Deadline
        * Gone Fishing: Harsh winter brings lake temps down, but not for long
        * Race, Cops & Traffic Stops
        * Listen to State Week - August 22, 2014
        * In Wake Of Ferguson, Rally Planned In Springfield
        * WUIS Education Desk: Springfield Mayoral Candidates Talk District 186
        * Unions Ask For Quick Ruling On Pensions
        * Report Says IDOT Broke Hiring Rules For Years
        * CPS students scramble for new school after Concept charter opening delayed
        * Illinois Takes First Step Toward Drafting Greenhouse Gas Plan


        * State employee unions want expedited ruling in pensions suit
        * November ballot certified without term limits question
        * IDOT broke hiring rules for years, report finds
        * Our Opinion: Another life saved by CPR
        * Esther Cepeda: Misreading our demographics
        * E.J. Dionne: Ferguson divides us less than we imagine
        * Richard Kaplan: Additional Rauner tax-return disclosures probably won’t reveal much
        * State Rep. Poe faces 3-week stem cell procedure in Texas
        * IDOT cuts positions following questions on hiring
        * Authorities investigating powdery substance at Illinois State Library


        * Police reports
        * Report: State agency broke hiring rules for years
        * Illini must move on without Peterson
        * Tickets on sale for Little Black Dress Party
        * Supreme Court won't take up term limits appeal
        * Metro-east hirings among those examined in IDOT investigation
        * No. 7 is ... Monticello
        * Preseason Top 10: Monticello at No. 7
        * United Methodist Children's Home receives $1.1 million grant
        * Two men arrested for possession of stolen property


        * Scouting Fox Valley girls golf
        * Little Bear Ribfest heats up
        * Welcome back message? High school sports do matter
        * Libertarian allowed on gubernatorial ballot
        * Visiting fans making voices heard at Wrigley

        * Statement by Representative Jan Schakowsky...
        * Legislation proposes mandating 24/7 nursin...
        * Statement by Representative Jan Schakowsky...
        * Farm Antibiotic Restrictions Proposed - Al...
        * Jan Schakowsky: Tom Marino's Response to '...
        * Telling Nancy Pelosi to do research is sex...
        * Schakowsky blasts Marino for 'sexist' atta...
        * Schakowsky: Marino's attack on Pelosi was ...
        * Dem: Attack on Pelosi was 'sexist' - The H...
        * How I failed to live on the minimum wage -...

        * Villa Park receives FEMA grant for new fir......
        * Villa Park receives FEMA grant for new fir......
        * Villa Park receives FEMA grant for new fir......
        * Villa Park receives FEMA grant for new fir......
        * Villa Park receives FEMA grant for new fir......

        * Senator Kirk Applauds New Life-Saving Stro......

        * Unrest in the Midwest
        * Possible Karen Lewis Super PAC Being Discussed
        * Report: State Agency Broke Hiring Rules For Years
        * We Are One Coalition Urges Circuit Court To Expedite Pension Suit
        * Supreme Court Won't Take Up Term Limits Appeal
        * CTU boss Karen Lewis officially files to run for Chicago mayor
        * Study: TSA Full-Body Scanners Photograph Genitals, But Miss Guns, Explosives, Knives
        * Appellate Court rules against term limits, effort heads for IL Supreme Court
        * Illinois Supreme Court refuses to take up term limits appeal. Rauner responds.
        * Chicago Archdiocese cool to ALS ice bucket challenge


        * Quinn Said He Was Stopping Patronage Hiring In 2010; He Was Actually Expanding It
        * Rauner: Quinn patronage scandal reminds us why we need term limits
        * Governor Quinn Announces New Class of Illinois State Police Cadets - More Cadets to Protect and Serve Communities Across Illinois
        * ICYMI: Term limits amendment — and citizens — lose
        * IDOT Teams Up with “Walking Dead” Star to Drive Down Fatalities in Illinois - Innovative New Labor Day Ad Campaign to Target Young Males; Law Enforcement to Crack Down on Drunk, Unbelted Drivers




            Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller