SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      Mobile Version     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact
CapitolFax.com
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
Hostile amendments mock ultrasound bill

Wednesday, Mar 7, 2012

* We talked the other day about a bill to require physicians to offer ultrasound tests to women who are seeking abortions.

Well, the legislation has attracted some hostile, mocking amendments. For instance, Amendment 1, which has since been tabled, would’ve changed the title from the “Ultrasound Opportunity Act” to the “Ultrasound and Erectile Dysfunction Information Opportunity Act“…

Consent to a prescription for medications for erectile dysfunction is voluntary and informed if and only if prior to prescribing medications for erectile dysfunction the physician who is to prescribe medications for erectile dysfunction has, in person, orally and in writing informed the man of all of the following:

    (1) The particular medical risks, if any, associated with the condition of erectile dysfunction.
    (2) The medical risks associated with the particular medication that would be prescribed, including, but not limited to, the medical risks of heart problems, stroke, hearing loss, vision loss, and priapism.
    (3) That erectile dysfunction medication may be dangerous if the man has:
    (A) heart problems, including heart pain (angina), heart failure, abnormal heart rhythms (arrhythmias), or a recent heart attack;
    (B) high or low blood pressure (hypertension or hypotension) that isn’t controlled;
    (C) a history of stroke;
    (D) eye problems such as retinitis pigmentosa or blood relatives with certain eye problems; or
    (E) sickle cell anemia, leukemia, or a health problem that can cause priaprism.
    (4) The details of the medical or surgical method that would be used to treat priapism, stroke, cardiac arrest, vision loss, and hearing loss, including the offer to view a medically accurate video depicting treatment of priapism.

* Amendment 3, introduced by Rep. Sara Feigenholtz, substitues “person” for the original language’s “woman” and “medical procedure” for “abortion” and considerably broadens the scope

Section 15. Offer of ultrasound required.

(a) At any facility where medical procedures are performed, the physician who is to perform the medical procedure, the referring physician, or another qualified person working in conjunction with either physician shall offer any person seeking medical care, including, but not limited to, cardiac, renal, liver, gallbladder, vascular, abdominal, obstetric, gynecological, muscle, ligament, tendon, eye, testicle, salivary gland, lymph node, breast, liver, kidney, and joint diagnosis or treatment, an opportunity to receive and view an ultrasound by someone qualified to perform ultrasounds at the facility, or at a facility listed in a listing of local ultrasound providers provided by the facility, at least one hour prior to the person having any part of a medical procedure performed, and prior to the administration of any anesthesia or medication in preparation for the medical procedure.

* Amendment 7

A group or individual policy of accident and health insurance or managed care plan amended, delivered, issued, or renewed after the effective date of this amendatory Act of the 97th General Assembly that does not provide coverage for contraception may not provide coverage for erectile dysfunction medication.

This isn’t the first time that an ultrasound bill has picked up hostile amendments, but I’m pretty sure there are more of them this year.

* Related and a roundup…

* Virginia ultrasound law is the image of a few others

* Senate panel advances proposed strip club tax: A proposal to start charging an entrance tax on Illinois strip clubs limped out of a Senate committee Tuesday. Although the measure is now positioned for a vote in the full Senate, senators raised concerns that it unfairly relies on downstate strip club patrons to generate revenue for rape crisis centers in Chicago.

* Vote delayed on RN staffing levels for nursing homes

* Yellow lights a second longer?: State Sen. Dan Duffy’s longtime crusade against red light cameras took a baby step forward this evening when a Senate committee advanced his plan to extend the duration of a yellow light by one second at any intersection with a red-light camera. What’s an extra second get you? Duffy said studies from other states show that a longer yellow light means fewer accidents at an intersection. And it might mean fewer tickets for drivers, giving them a little extra time to get through an intersection. Even though the Senate committee voted to send it to the full Senate, Duffy’s plan has to change before it moves forward. Because of various concerns from lawmakers on the panel, they asked the Lake Barrington Republican to agree not to proceed further until he hears out their ideas and considers changes.

* House committee OKs fees for state parks: House Bill 5789, sponsored by Rep. JoAnn Osmond, R-Antioch, leaves it up to DNR to decide what the fees should be. The department supported the legislation, noting that it faces a 13.5 percent budget cut under Gov. Pat Quinn’s proposed fiscal year 2013 budget.

* Editorial: Push to record

* Kadner: Riley opposes shifting pension costs to schools

* Mitchell would reduce taxes for ‘S’ corporations

* Lawmakers across US file “Caylee’s Law” legislation: In Illinois, Senator Ira Silverstein filed Senate Bill 2537 in November; it was assigned to the Criminal Law Committee in January. Silverstein’s legislation creates three Class 3 felony offenses in cases where a parent or guardian fails to notify law enforcement of a child’s disappearance in a timely manner, learns of but does not report a minor child’s death or refuses to provide medical information or disturbs evidence related to the death, or provides false or misleading information to authorities during an investigation of a missing child.

* Caylee’s Law passes Senate committee

* Quinn holds back vote of confidence for Hogan

- Posted by Rich Miller        


44 Comments
  1. - And I Approved This Message - Wednesday, Mar 7, 12 @ 11:06 am:

    If this post remains up for more than four hours you should consult a physician immediately.


  2. - Holdingontomywallet - Wednesday, Mar 7, 12 @ 11:14 am:

    “Hostile, mocking amendments” - sounds like a great use of their time (insert eye roll here).


  3. - Cheryl44 - Wednesday, Mar 7, 12 @ 11:14 am:

    Do these clowns in the GA understand what it is a lot of women think when they send a bill out of the Ag committee that is incredibly anti-women AND they call it an opportunity?


  4. - Oswego Willy - Wednesday, Mar 7, 12 @ 11:15 am:

    NEW BILL REQUIRES DOCTOR’S VISIT FOR ALL SICK DAYS TAKEN BEFORE RETURNING TO WORK

    HOUSE BILL REQUIRES KIDS TO BRING DOG TO SCHOOL WHEN HOMEWORK IS EATEN FOR XRAYS

    SENATE VOTES ON BILL - ALARM CLOCK CALIBRATION ACT FOR TARDINESS

    COMMITTEE TO HEAR TESTIMONY ON FINDING LOST HOUR DURING DAYLIGHT SAVINGS

    BILL REQUIRES PUBLIC APOLOGIES MUST HAVE LIE DETECTORS TEST TO PROVE THEY ARE REAL


  5. - Elijiah Snow - Wednesday, Mar 7, 12 @ 11:18 am:

    Whomever thought of that is a genius. Genius!


  6. - Small Town Liberal - Wednesday, Mar 7, 12 @ 11:19 am:

    - sounds like a great use of their time (insert eye roll here). -

    Of course you have no comments for the legislators introducing the bills in the first place. Apparently anti-abortion bills aren’t a time waster, but amendments to those bills are. I guess the legislators pushing the bills have already finished their work on the budget and you’re giving them the green light for social issues? Makes sense.


  7. - It's Just Me - Wednesday, Mar 7, 12 @ 11:19 am:

    And these idiots wonder why they had trouble getting their petitions signed.


  8. - Foxfire - Wednesday, Mar 7, 12 @ 11:29 am:

    So good to know that legislators and staff have the time and resources to develop these amendments. Is it too much to ask that they use their creative energy to come up with some solutions to the state’s “real problems.”


  9. - Aaron - Wednesday, Mar 7, 12 @ 11:33 am:

    Anti-abortion clowns deserve to be derided in public and in the GA. I’ll borrow a line from the gun nuts, “It’s a constitutional right.”


  10. - Fed up - Wednesday, Mar 7, 12 @ 11:36 am:

    Glad to see we have got the budget all fixed and paid all the past due bills. After all the hard work hhese fine public servants deserve some play time.


  11. - Plutocrat03 - Wednesday, Mar 7, 12 @ 11:42 am:

    ditto Fed Up


  12. - Small Town Liberal - Wednesday, Mar 7, 12 @ 11:45 am:

    Foxfire, Fed up, Pluto - Do you folks not realize that to have amendments, there have to be bills? What about the legislators that introduced the bills? Are they exempt from your lame arguments about wasting time? Also, you realize requiring an ultrasound costs money, where’s the vitriol? Come on, at least try to make your arguments apply to everyone.


  13. - Montrose - Wednesday, Mar 7, 12 @ 11:47 am:

    Guess what folks - legislators work on issues outside of the budget. I know that is a shock, but they do. It is a legislating body and there are a few things going on outside of the budget process that matter to people on both sides of the isle. So, take a deep breath and move on to a substantive conversation of the bill and amendments at hand.

    I am all for the amendments and they do a fine job of pointing out the hypocrisy of the bill.


  14. - grand old partisan - Wednesday, Mar 7, 12 @ 11:50 am:

    can we please, please, PLEASE drop that “anti-woman” claptrap. I am pro-life because I believe human life begins at conception, not because I’m a misogynist.

    As for the ultra-sound proposal, I can’t say I really understand the outrage over the ultra-sound proposal. Even the most invasive ultra-sounds procedures are no more invasive than the abortion procedure the woman is voluntarily seeking anyway. And isn’t it pretty common practice for doctors to show you some image of whatever cyst, tumor, growth, etc that they are planning to remove from you?


  15. - Rich Miller - Wednesday, Mar 7, 12 @ 11:51 am:

    ===Glad to see we have got the budget all fixed and paid all the past due bills.===

    That’s odd. I wonder why you didn’t also post this comment on the concealed carry bill post today?


  16. - Small Town Liberal - Wednesday, Mar 7, 12 @ 11:54 am:

    GOP - How about we make up a group comprised overwhelmingly of women to make laws regarding your reproductive health? Think you’d be pleased with their understanding of your body?


  17. - wordslinger - Wednesday, Mar 7, 12 @ 12:00 pm:

    –Glad to see we have got the budget all fixed and paid all the past due bills.–

    By that logic, I presume you want the ultra-sound bill withdrawn. And concealed carry. And anything else outside of the budget.


  18. - John A Logan - Wednesday, Mar 7, 12 @ 12:05 pm:

    these amendments do little to advance anyone’s argument and provide another example of why its hard to respect the members of the G.A.


  19. - haverford - Wednesday, Mar 7, 12 @ 12:08 pm:

    Wrong, GOP. Most early abortions are medical, as opposed to surgical abortions - a combination of pills, rather than an invasive procedure. Ultrasounds for that same timeframe must be done intravaginally - not the belly ultrasound we’re all familar with, which is why we all got to learn the term “dildonic” the other week when the Virginia stuff was going on.

    Not to mention that it’s beside the point - it’s not medically necessary. We don’t make people get random (and sometimes invasive) procedures for any other medical or surgical procedure. That’s what the amendments are meant to highlight.


  20. - grand old partisan - Wednesday, Mar 7, 12 @ 12:21 pm:

    STL - As long as they were doing so in order to save the lives of an unborn child, and the prerequisite procedure they were mandating posed no risk to my own health, I’d be fine with it.

    I watched my wife go through two pregnancies. They were both stressful for her, physically, mentally and emotionally. So I understand the whole “that’s easy for you to say” component of this debate. But I also watched my children grow, felt their kicks and listened to their heartbeats. They each developed little routines, waking and sleep patterns. They reacted to voices and music. They were alive. They had personalities. They deserved protection. And they were as much my children then as they are now. To think that if my wife were to have suddenly had a change of heart and wanted to abort them, she could have done so unilaterally??? Well, that doesn’t sit well with me. And it shouldn’t sit well with anyone.

    A child’s life is a miracle. A gift from our creator. No one – not even their mother – has the right to take that away from them.

    It’s not my fault that the abortion debate comes down to women’s rights versus the rights of a child. But it does. And I side with the children.


  21. - Skeeter - Wednesday, Mar 7, 12 @ 12:26 pm:

    GOP, why do you (and the bill’s original sponsors) feel that doctors are incapable of proving full and accurate advice to the patient? Why do you need Big Government dictating what the doctor must say and do?

    On a somewhat related note, Peter Roskam has been tweeting up a storm the past day or so about something called IPAB that Roskam claims allows the government to make medical decisions.

    The right wingers need to hold a meeting and get their stories straight. Do we want government making medical decisions or not?


  22. - Skeeter - Wednesday, Mar 7, 12 @ 12:29 pm:

    GOP, do you really feel that laws should be based on the “gift from the creator” theory?


  23. - grand old partisan - Wednesday, Mar 7, 12 @ 12:39 pm:

    Skeeter - fine, forget the creator. Let me ask you: why do you favor laws against murder? Regardless of what your answer is to that, I believe the same applies to abortion because a human being’s right to life begins at conception. Besides being my religious conviction, it’s really the only rational, objective measure.


  24. - Skeeter - Wednesday, Mar 7, 12 @ 12:45 pm:

    Because murder involves a living breathing human. Your view on “human life” is an entirely arbitrary one based on your religious views. A fetus is a bundle of cells that cannot exist outside the woman’s body. That seems to be a meaningful distinction.

    But this is not a debate over whether abortion is good or bad. I was just struck by your religious justification, particularly since so many in the GOP are outraged that Muslims may ever want to use their faith to justify law.

    This is a digression however, and nothing more. The issue relative the original post concerns the right’s claim to be against big government but wanting that government to be in the doctor’s office demanding that the government decide how a patient should be treated.


  25. - grand old partisan - Wednesday, Mar 7, 12 @ 12:56 pm:

    skeeter - you’re right that this is a digression from the original post, but let me just say this: if the Catholic Church came out tomorrow and said abortion was fine, I’d still be against it. I didn’t become consciously pro-life until I had kids, and realized that what was growing in wife’s womb was clearly not just a “bundle of cells.” My children could have existed outside my wife’s body long before their actual delivery dates. “Viability” is a difficult concept to definte. So, logically (to me at least), the only objective “starting point” for life is conception.

    That being said, I don’t have any problem with anyone of faith - even Muslims - using their faith to inform public policy positions. I do have a problem with the brutal way that Islamic law treats women, however. Just sayin’

    Finally, in terms of hypocracy relating to privacy issues, I’ll just reiterate that I don’t see abortion as just another medical decision to made between a doctor and a patient. That, to me, is akin to saying that slavery was just a business transaction.


  26. - ArchPundit - Wednesday, Mar 7, 12 @ 1:00 pm:

    ===And isn’t it pretty common practice for doctors to show you some image of whatever cyst, tumor, growth, etc that they are planning to remove from you?

    I just had a cyst removed from my wrist (dang rhyme) and no ultrasound or anything besides the doctor manually poking at it until surgery.


  27. - ArchPundit - Wednesday, Mar 7, 12 @ 1:04 pm:

    Hit send to soon–the point being, it should be a decision between a doctor and the patient as to what should be done before an abortion. That’s a completely different argument than whether abortion should be legal. As it is legal, the doctor and patient should be deciding how to proceed, not the legislature.


  28. - Allen Skillicorn - Wednesday, Mar 7, 12 @ 1:08 pm:

    Duffy’s Sb3502 one second for safety, would be very popular and is good policy. Safety should always take priority over money.


  29. - mark walker - Wednesday, Mar 7, 12 @ 2:01 pm:

    I don’t think the bills mocking the required ultrasounds, some of which are physically invasive, are strong enough. Just requiring delays, extraneous information, unnecessary equipment, before prescribing for erectile disfunction are not equivilent — they should be legally requiring a colonoscopy to be comparable.


  30. - OneMan - Wednesday, Mar 7, 12 @ 2:06 pm:

    GOP - How about we make up a group comprised overwhelmingly of women to make laws regarding your reproductive health? Think you’d be pleased with their understanding of your body?

    Considering how I feel about urban Democrats understands of budgets, state finances, suburban education transportation funding, yeah I can see your point.

    Unfortunately for all of us, laws are not made by people with master degrees in technical fields who live in the suburbs, because only people like me should have any say in an issue that impacts me….


  31. - OneMan - Wednesday, Mar 7, 12 @ 2:09 pm:

    Still don’t understand why folks get their shorts in a bunch over laws that have no chance to pass but are handy red meat for some base or the other….

    I remember a few years ago there was a proposed law that would have required you to either have completed a union run painting apprentice program or have an MBA to be a painting contractor. Obviously red meat for the painters union and it went nowhere.


  32. - Wensicia - Wednesday, Mar 7, 12 @ 2:42 pm:

    ==Still don’t understand why folks get their shorts in a bunch over laws that have no chance to pass==

    But these laws, and worse, have passed in other states. The fact we currently have a Democratic majority isn’t excuse enough to keep from protesting/mocking this stuff when it’s actually presented in a bill.


  33. - Cheryl44 - Wednesday, Mar 7, 12 @ 3:29 pm:

    I just checked my gmail spam and there are 6 different emails about going back to school and learning to be a certified ultrasound technician. I’m guessing those have to do with all the nonsensical anti-women legislation up for a vote all over the place.


  34. - hisgirlfriday - Wednesday, Mar 7, 12 @ 3:44 pm:

    “can we please, please, PLEASE drop that “anti-woman” claptrap. I am pro-life because I believe human life begins at conception, not because I’m a misogynist.”

    No one is calling you or anyone a misogynist for thinking life begins at conception.

    What is misogynist is thinking that a woman is incapable of understanding what she is doing when she terminates a pregnancy or that she is incapable of asking her doctor for more information when terminating a pregnancy without men in the Illinois General Assembly’s agriculture committee ordering an ultrasound be done and shown to her before she can provide informed consent for a medical procedure.

    These amendments are ridiculous, but so is the ultrasound bill in the first place. (I have less imagination than these folks so would have simply offered an amendment that mandates that a man gets an opportunity of a sonogram when he gets a vasectomy too.)

    If you want to stop abortions because you believe that life beings an conception, then SUPPORT contraception as a legislator or if you find that objectionable, then simply use your bully pulpit as an official to speak about the moral implications of conduct, but leave the taxpayers and doctors and the Illinois statutes out of it.

    Don’t abuse your authority as a legislator to get between women and their doctors and the exercise of a constitutional right just because you think you know better than the person exercising that


  35. - Small Town Liberal - Wednesday, Mar 7, 12 @ 3:48 pm:

    - Considering how I feel about urban Democrats understands of budgets, state finances, suburban education transportation funding, yeah I can see your point.

    Unfortunately for all of us, laws are not made by people with master degrees in technical fields who live in the suburbs, because only people like me should have any say in an issue that impacts me… -

    Straw man. Reproductive rights are a pretty personal, so it’s no surprise that women take these issues very personally. If the tables were turned, men would as well. That’s all I was saying.


  36. - jerry 101 - Wednesday, Mar 7, 12 @ 4:32 pm:

    “A gift from our creator. No one – not even their mother – has the right to take that away from them.”

    Strange…I coulda sworn that my mother was my creator. I’m pretty sure I didn’t exist until she created me from her own body.


  37. - grand old partisan - Wednesday, Mar 7, 12 @ 4:34 pm:

    I think the left needs to find a new euphemism, because “reproduction rights” imply some things that are contradictory to your argument. After all, I’m pretty sure that women are not able to “reproduce” all on their own. A man has a role and legal financial/responsibilities in the reproductive process, so why don’t they have any “rights” in this matter. Additionally, one has to ask, what exactly is being “reproduced.” Seems to me that, by definition, a human could only “reproduce” another human. Why doesn’t the human being reproduced have any rights in the matter?


  38. - grand old partisan - Wednesday, Mar 7, 12 @ 4:43 pm:

    == I’m pretty sure I didn’t exist until she created me from her own body

    All on her own? Really? As others have rightly pointed out here today, I’m no expert on the female body….but I’m pretty sure that is impossible


  39. - grand old partisan - Wednesday, Mar 7, 12 @ 4:44 pm:

    btw, jerry101, at what point would you say you began “existing?”


  40. - amalia - Wednesday, Mar 7, 12 @ 5:14 pm:

    Grand Old Partisan, since you are a Roman Catholic you will recall that life begins at conception was not always church policy, that the concept of quickening was used, and that from science we know that viability in the first 8 or 12 weeks of fetal development is not possible.

    Sarah Feigenholtz, rock on with your mocking amendment self!!!


  41. - Peggy R/Southern - Wednesday, Mar 7, 12 @ 5:35 pm:

    GOP–Nice job holding your own here today!

    The ultrasound will show the woman that the baby is NOT merely a clump of cells,but a life formed into a human body sooner than we realize. Most women don’t understand it. There are shady, unregulated abortionists out there. Most abortuaries are not held to the same safety standards as outpatient surgical facilities.

    Seeing the baby in an ultrasound scares the abortion movement. It’s not anti-woman. Like it or not, women, not men, have bodies that carry babies from conception until birth. Whether you think a god designed that or not, it is a fact that’s hard to get around.
    The Church is not afraid of science, but of what immoral things may be done with science. There is scientific thought in what the Catholic Church believes and teaches. Abortion has always been wrong to the Church.

    While there is a lot of silly unimportant business being pursued in SPFLD, it’s hard to fault legislators who want to save human lives.


  42. - amalia - Wednesday, Mar 7, 12 @ 5:52 pm:

    Peggy R, thanks for underestimating what women understand. if you are not afraid of science, then you will recognize that there is not a heartbeat in the fetus at the moment of conception and that there is not a tiny fully formed baby like the flying pix on crosses in Renaissance paintings. As for the Church…..my church is called the Church too and it is not Roman Catholic.


  43. - Aaron - Wednesday, Mar 7, 12 @ 9:50 pm:

    Peggy, the Church is afraid of science otherwise they wouldn’t have tried to stifle it for centuries. And Peggy the way to prevent “unregulated abortionists” is not to make it legally impossible to get an abortion. Stop treading on a woman’s constitutional right.


  44. - jake - Thursday, Mar 8, 12 @ 12:59 am:

    Given the absurdity and maliciousness of the ultrasound bill itself, I think the mocking amendments are completely appropriate. The people who are introducing the amendments are in general conscientious and responsible legislators. In this case they are expressing scorn and outrage by use of ridicule, and I think they are completely justified.


Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.


* Reader comments closed for the holiday weekend
* Can't anybody play this game?
* Radogno: Pass the grand bargain by the end of this month or forget it
* Question of the day
* CMS warns comptroller over draining special funds
* *** UPDATED x3 *** ISBE to vote on settling Urban League school funding lawsuit
* *** UPDATED x1 - FY18 bills filed *** Get out your checkbook, Mr. Mayor
* Midway contract criticized
* Bob Michel passes away
* Another day, another Rauner campaign ad
* Clearing up a little confusion
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today's edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)
* Madigan orders committee to take up Thompson Center sale issue
* Yesterday's blog posts

Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............
<


Search This Blog...

  
* IFROGZ Impulse Wireless Headphones review
* Korean regulators looking into whether Google’s Android hurt Samsung’s Tizen
* Free App 'Reverb' Brings Amazon's Alexa to Mac Desktops, iPhones and iPads
* Children's Organic Storybook 'Green Riding Hood' is Apple's Free App of the Week
* ZTE Hawkeye officially getting retooled, fund on Kickstarter canceled
* Reuters: Softbank wants Sprint and T-Mobile to merge, would give up control to Deutsche Telekom
* Should you take benchmarks seriously?

* Renteria establishes rapport with White Sox
* Energized Lawrie stepping in right direction
* Moncada ignores hype, focuses on Sox roster
* Let's watch Yoan Moncada's adorable son flip his bat
* Fantasy Player Preview: Dominate your draft
* White Sox Top 30 Prospects list
* Spring Training has arrived! Get tickets, schedule and gear

...............


Main Menu
Home
Illinois
YouTube
Pundit rankings
Obama
Subscriber Content
Durbin
Burris
Blagojevich Trial
Advertising
Updated Posts
Polls

Archives
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005

Syndication

RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0
WordPress

Loading


* Voice of The Southern: Carbondale, SIU taking r.....
* Jim Dey: Budget, contract fights threaten state.....
* Battling Illinois’ budget blues..
* Battling Illinois' budget blues - Champaign/Urb.....
* John Foreman: I just don't understand - Champai.....
* Jim Dey: Budget, contract fights threaten state.....
* Walter Jacobson's Perspective 2/19/2107: Boomin.....
* State law requires Will County schools, daycare.....


* Illinois Ag Department to discuss plan to fight gypsy moths
* SIU-Carbondale narrows chancellor search to 7 semifinalists
* Off-duty sheriff shot in the leg
* Syrian woman previously denied entry arrives in Chicago
* Police find nearly 130 explosives at Normal man's home
* Tentative settlement reached in 2008 Illinois education suit
* U of Illinois police issue letter about sexual assaults
* Maine utility regulators to consider $1.5B FairPoint sale
* Amputee prosthetic legs with Boston bombing survivor's help
* Illinois summer police camp for teens taking applications

* Effort to privatize economic development questioned
* State budget impasse still hurting schools
* DHS moving into former Barney's Furniture store
* Madigan says House will consider sale of Thompson Center
* Bustos, other Dems demand Rauner pay domestic violence money
* State budget gap could be more than $7 billion
* Rauner administration says Mendoza decision on payroll could jeopardize services
* Legislation to change date on state seal passes House
* Lisa Madigan to appeal denial of motion to stop state worker pay
* Illinois attorney general to appeal denial of motion to stop state worker pay

* Like our roundup? Share it around.
* The 50 priciest​ home sales of 2016 are here
* Rauner finally weighs in on budget to Capitol laughter and groans
* Springfield's incapacity a threat to all small businesses, including mine
* Is Bruce Rauner the only grown-up in Springfield?


* 2 dead in Peotone motorcycle crash
* Chicago man wins $4 million lottery prize
* Beat the Champs: Half the field, Section 4/Will Cty & Fox Valley
* 6 injured when car crashes into South Loop building
* Man shot during argument in Pilsen
* Joliet man dies at work, trapped between heavy machinery
* Four hospitalized due to carbon monoxide in Naperville
* Man suspected in 5 bank robberies strikes again in Alsip
* Man shot while driving on Dan Ryan
* Dear Abby: Late to bed, late to rise makes mom, kids tardy


* Vinnie Hinostroza will rejoin the Blackhawks in Buffalo
* Swedes scratch heads after Trump says 'look what's happening last night in Sweden'
* Pence visits former Nazi concentration camp
* SpaceX launches rocket from NASA's historic moon pad
* Off-duty Cook County correctional officer shot in Englewood
* Dwyane Wade and Gabrielle Union won't 'stick to sports' - nor should they
* David Rollins finds relief with Cubs after offseason in flux
* The FCC wants you to be able to listen to FM radio from your smartphone
* Revived by rally, Trump turns back to governing
* 1 dead, 10 wounded, including Cook County officer, in Chicago shootings


» Syrian Family Reunites Three Weeks After Travel Ban
» Man Charged In Shooting Death Of Chicago Toddler
» State Week: 'Balanced' Is In The Eye Of The Beholder
» State Settles Suit Over Discriminatory School Funding
» Professor Says Department Will Still Consider Students Affected By Travel Ban
» Man Charged With Shooting 11-Year-Old Assaulted
» Indiana Governor Pledges State Aid For East Chicago Lead Problems
» City Council Advances Plan To Bring New Stores To Midway
» Ex-Obama Aide Fined $90,000 For Chicago Lobbying Violation
» WWII Pilot's Family To Honor O'Hare At Namesake Airport


* Bernard Schoenburg: Dems eye Rodney Davis, who expects the challenge
* Effort to privatize economic development questioned
* Bernard Schoenburg: Dems eye Davis, who expects the challenge
* Statehouse Insider: This is what's meant by balanced?
* State budget impasse still hurting schools
* Our View: Springfield aldermen need to look long term on budget
* DHS moving into former Barney's Furniture store
* Dalia Anguiano Henry: The path toward being a compassionate, faith-motivated activist
* United Way: Addressing basic needs in our community
* Addressing basic needs in our community


* St. Clair County considering trap and release rules for stray cats
* Radio personality Ryan Patrick found his voice at JALC
* PFOP: Campaign to aid Britain comes to Bloomington
* Family endures difficult first decade of farm enterprise
* Big box stores adopt home delivery while smaller ones adapt without
* Bicycle-sharing program to launch March 20
* No complaints: Surprise heat wave breaks records, lures many outside
* St. Louis officers involved in shooting late Saturday
* Kiosk designed to raise awareness about earthquake threat
* George Will: An adult voice amid pandemic childishness


* Blast in Somalia kills 20 in Mogadishu marketplace
* Senior Trump appointee fired after critical comments
* The fiduciary rule and you
* How a pet chicken helped me understand my autistic son
* Toughening penalties if pets are harmed during crimes

* US Representative Randy Hultgren visits ne...
* US Congressman tours new Aurora Specialty ...
* Hultgren criticizes immigration ban, Roska...
* Bernard Schoenburg: Dems eye Rodney Davis,...
* Hultgren updates work on heroin, opioid ab...
* Group upset with Trump wants Town Hall mee...
* US Rep. Randy Hultgren talks veterans' iss...
* US Rep. Randy Hultgren reflects on busines...
* Hultgren co-sponsors bill to assist Americ...
* Rep. Randy Hultgren appears to distance hi...

* Sen. Hirono, Other Democrats Introduce Bil......
* Sen. Hirono, Other Democrats Introduce Bil......

* Dem Sen Duckworth: 'This Is Not the Presid......

* We have been here before. 75 years ago today, FDR signed Executive Order 9066.
* “We oppose the expansion of Speer Charter High School.”
* Resistance Sunday.
* Day Of Remembrance Programs At History Museum Sunday
* Take the Trump survey and rate the perfidious media
* The horrors—real and imagined—of a weekend in Trump’s southern Illinois
* New York quartet Hush Point deftly modernize west-coast jazz fundamentals
* Andersonville Restaurant Week, Ballet de Lorraine, and more things to do in Chicago this weekend
* Activate:Chi aims to bring the music and nightlife biz into the resistance
* Former Obama adviser David Plouffe fined for illegally lobbying Rahm on behalf of Uber, and other Chicago news


* Governor Takes Bill Action
* 2017 Budget Address
* Rauner, Lawmakers Move to Protect Taxpayers from Inmate Legal Bills
* Illinois Department of Veterans’ Affairs Announcednew pilot program titled Tiny Boots
* Governor Rauner Attends Illinois National Guard Deployment Ceremony




Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller