SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      Mobile Version     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact
CapitolFax.com
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
Today’s quote

Thursday, Nov 29, 2012

* David E. Smith, executive director of the Illinois Family Institute, speaking about the push for gay marriage

Smith, of the Illinois Family Institute, alleged that the real motive for some activists is “more sinister” and that “the goal, for some, is the eradication of marriage altogether.”

Um, huh?

- Posted by Rich Miller        


33 Comments
  1. - corvax - Thursday, Nov 29, 12 @ 9:44 am:

    Those trying to protect marriage puzzle me in their oppositon to gay marriage. If they really want to protect it, how about a constitutional amendment prescribing stoning for adultery? Now there’s a threat to marriage.


  2. - OneMan - Thursday, Nov 29, 12 @ 9:47 am:

    Regardless of the issue, I suspect that the motivations of some are “more sinister” than others.

    So what…


  3. - The Captain - Thursday, Nov 29, 12 @ 9:49 am:

    That quote was taken out of context, it should have included the following line immediately after:

    “And I would have gotten away with it too if it wasn’t for you meddling kids.”


  4. - downstate commissioner - Thursday, Nov 29, 12 @ 9:55 am:

    “Eradication of marriage altogether”– I’m okay with that-free love for everyone!!! (My wife didn’t give me permission to say that, but she doesn’t read Capfax)


  5. - Fan of the Game - Thursday, Nov 29, 12 @ 9:58 am:

    I have never understood why governments–at any level–concern themselves with marriage between consenting adults. No government has any compelling interest in who I choose to marry. Because this is true, there should be no government benefits for being married. Treat all individuals equally, whether they are married or not.


  6. - wordslinger - Thursday, Nov 29, 12 @ 10:01 am:

    I don’t understand what Smith is trying to say.

    How would one go about eradicating marriage altogether? Where does this sinister plot manifest itself?


  7. - Ahoy! - Thursday, Nov 29, 12 @ 10:06 am:

    thinking before you say something can be hard.


  8. - Jimbo - Thursday, Nov 29, 12 @ 10:07 am:

    Fan, marriage is a contractual relationship. Not that IL really cares about contracts, but I think we can agree the government has a necessary role in enforcing contracts.


  9. - Precinct Captain - Thursday, Nov 29, 12 @ 10:09 am:

    He’s an idiot. Most troglodytes are. Anyway, how would marriage be eradicated anyway? Would it happen when I am able to marry my dog, as these buffoons say is the next step after marriage equality? Or maybe my fish or my car or house? Looks like even under the batsh*t crazy scenarios marriage isn’t being eradicated.


  10. - Grandson of Man - Thursday, Nov 29, 12 @ 10:13 am:

    I don’t understand why the party of small government pushes for constitutional amendments to prohibit two consenting adults from entering a relationship they choose to define as marriage. A constitutional amendment is very big government.

    I support gay marriage, but it’s not a top issue for me, so I had no idea that states had constitutional amendments that had of course had to pass tougher voting requirements. That is extra large government.

    Two gay people entering a union that they define as marriage in no way threatens my personal definition of marriage. How is allowing more people to marry “the eradication of marriage altogether?”

    I met Rep. Harris once and spoke with him once or twice. I’m not his constituent, but he was wonderful to the few of us who met with him. I hope that through his legislative efforts, he gets the right to marry.


  11. - Lil Squeezy - Thursday, Nov 29, 12 @ 10:17 am:

    Some people just don’t mind being on the wrong side of history. If you are opposed to any rights for homosexuals you should stay quite. It will make it easier to answer future generations when they ask what it was like back in the day when people fought against homosexual rights. You don’t want your grandchildren to think you are totes cray.


  12. - Aldyth - Thursday, Nov 29, 12 @ 10:17 am:

    I live a stone’s throw from Iowa, where marriage equality has been around for a few years. In that time, I have not seen rampaging immorality seeping across the Mississippi river. There have been no gay recruitment drives or mass dissolution of marriages in my neighborhood. The Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse are not parked in my driveway.

    Downside? I haven’t seen it, except for having to buy some wedding gifts for friends who finally got to have a wedding ceremony after twenty-plus years of committed relationships with their partners.


  13. - Natasha Fatale - Thursday, Nov 29, 12 @ 10:22 am:

    Sinister, indeed! You can’t keep us from our fiendish goals, dahlink!


  14. - Pot calling kettle - Thursday, Nov 29, 12 @ 10:23 am:

    ==I have never understood why governments–at any level–concern themselves with marriage between consenting adults.==

    The interest (and justification for a tax break) is that the committed & binding relationship relieves the government of certain burdens. If only one of the two works, the other is less likely need or ask for government support. The spouse can also make medical decisions, be held responsible for debts, act as the executor of an estate, and many other responsibilities. The government thus has an interest in certifying and recording the partnership and, if necessary, overseeing the dissolution.


  15. - Just Me - Thursday, Nov 29, 12 @ 10:23 am:

    Will someone please give him some more rope?


  16. - soccermom - Thursday, Nov 29, 12 @ 10:30 am:

    I am worried about the whole dog marriage thing. My husband really loves our dog. If they make gay dog marriage illegal, I could lose them both. Oh help me, help me Mr. Smith. You’re the only thing standing between me and a broken home — which oddly, means something very different from housebroken, getting back to the dog thing.

    Yeah, this guy really made me think.


  17. - The Doc - Thursday, Nov 29, 12 @ 10:31 am:

    ==If only one of the two works, the other is less likely need or ask for government support.==

    Isn’t the tax break a form of government support? I’m not necessarily arguing against the policy, only pointing out that I think you reasoning is flawed.


  18. - Judgment Day - Thursday, Nov 29, 12 @ 10:32 am:

    Yeah, whatever.

    Tell Smith to put on his chainmail armour, get on his horse, and there’s a windmill over in Geneva (Fabyan Park Windmill) on the east side of the Fox River that he can go attack.

    You really want to encourage marriages? Get governments to reduce their fees for obtaining marriage licenses. Do something useful - for a change.


  19. - Grandson of Man - Thursday, Nov 29, 12 @ 10:42 am:

    Someone once told me that if gay marriage is allowed, what’s next, people marrying dogs and other animals? I told a friend about this, and he said something that was so funny and true, and it just blew that ridiculous argument out of the water. He said, can animals sign consent forms?


  20. - too obvious - Thursday, Nov 29, 12 @ 10:47 am:

    Come on, Dave Smith is right. If the sacred institution of marriage isn’t defended, some day the right of wealthy men to marry a second or third trophy wife will have less cache’.


  21. - Lil Squeezy - Thursday, Nov 29, 12 @ 10:50 am:

    I think we should abolish government sanctioned marriage altogether, and replace it with civil unions. Then people and organizations could determine what marriage means to them. The Catholic Church could marry people based on their belief, and a local dungeons and dragons club could do the same if they chose to. So, yes, I do support eradicating marriage from our statute, but realizing I am in the minority and I am happy to support Rep. Harris.


  22. - Fan of the Game - Thursday, Nov 29, 12 @ 11:13 am:

    Contractual relationships are items for lawyers and courts and marriage should be handled just like any other contractual relationship.

    ==The spouse can also make medical decisions, be held responsible for debts, act as the executor of an estate, and many other responsibilities.==

    Again, these are contractual obligations, not governmental obligations. While the courts may be needed to ensure the marriage contract is enforced, I can make the same arrangements with my father or sister or a stranger. Again, the government has no compelling interest.


  23. - walkinfool - Thursday, Nov 29, 12 @ 11:23 am:

    The states which have the most public support for expanding marriage rights, also happen to have had the lowest divorce rates.

    These are related only in that those who most oppose marriage equality are operating from (misplaced) fear.


  24. - The Other Anonymous - Thursday, Nov 29, 12 @ 11:49 am:

    @Fan of the game: contractual relationships are simply not the same as marriage rights. Consider what happens when your spouse/partner is taken to an emergency room. Now consider the different reactions — and legal liabilities and obligations on the part of hospital staffs — when you say, ” My wife/husband was just brought here” versus “my contractuallly bound life partner was just brought here”?

    Marriage provides a shorthand for a host of legal, social, and cultural norms. And the state does have an interest in regulating those norms; it does not have a compelling interest (IMO) in excluding gay people from those norms.


  25. - Just Observing - Thursday, Nov 29, 12 @ 11:51 am:

    === marriage is a contractual relationship. Not that IL really cares about contracts, but I think we can agree the government has a necessary role in enforcing contracts. ===

    Yes, but government’s role in marriage currently goes well beyond enforcement of a contract. One need permission from the government before one can get married. In most (or all) other contractual agreements, you do not need permission from the government before entering into the contract.


  26. - jaranath - Thursday, Nov 29, 12 @ 11:54 am:

    I think the motivation on the anti-equality side has little to do with any specific beliefs about the quality of their own marriages, nor society’s “moral fabric”. Certainly those are some of the rationalizations they offer, and I have little doubt many of them believe it.

    But in reality, this is about power, privilege and social deference slipping through the fingers of religious and social conservatives. Marriage is just a proxy for the broader cultural shift. They defend the traditional concept of marriage not just because it reflects their ideal, but because it implies a specific government endorsement of their ideal. To lose that is to disturb the denial they’ve been living in since the ’60s, the same denial fueling the careers of the David Bartons of the world.


  27. - Fan of the Game - Thursday, Nov 29, 12 @ 12:20 pm:

    ==Yes, but government’s role in marriage currently goes well beyond enforcement of a contract. One need permission from the government before one can get married.==

    @Just Observing–I understand that. My point is that the government shouldn’t have that authority over who marries whom. Government’s only compelling interest is in the benefits it has chosen to give to married couples. IMO, married people should have no more benefits than single people.

    @The Other Anonymous–I would still say, “My wife was brought here.” I would still be married; I just wouldn’t need a government sanction to be married. The government does NOT have an interest in social or cultural norms. It has an interest in protecting the rights of the individual, and in determining who can marry whom and providing benefits to the “approved” class of people, it thwarts those rights.


  28. - Steve Downstate - Thursday, Nov 29, 12 @ 12:40 pm:

    I hope that David E. Smith is ready to announce his public support for outlawing divorce and (once again) criminalizing adultery.

    No, no, I don’t really want to see that happen. But if Smith and his allies really were out to save marriages, they would be taking on the things that actually cause many heterosexual marriages to dissolve, instead of trying to push back against same-sex couples who love each other and…oh horror of horrors!…want to MARRY.


  29. - jerry 101 - Thursday, Nov 29, 12 @ 1:36 pm:

    hmmm…well, you see…if the Gays get the right to marry, the Straight people won’t get married anymore. Why? Because, if the gays can get married, then being straight married loses all its exclusive priviledges. Plus, the straight folk will decide to not marry or to divorce in order to protest the gay marrying. Or, all straight people will just turn gay and marry members of their own sex. Anyway, once all the straight marriages are gone, the gays will no longer want to be married, so marriage will go away. Or, once the gays get married, then they’ll decide that marriage should be allowed to cast a wider net than just two people. So, the gays will push for polygamy to be legalized. But then, everyone will just decide to descend into a pit of wanton polyamory and just skip getting married altogether. So, marriage is destroyed.

    Or something. These people from the IFI seem to have severe psychological issues. They all need to spend a great deal of time in therapy.


  30. - Newsclown - Thursday, Nov 29, 12 @ 2:06 pm:

    Did this guy get his talking points from Newt Gingrich?


  31. - amalia - Thursday, Nov 29, 12 @ 5:45 pm:

    Illinois Fantasy Family Institute. my marriage is not threatened by anyone else who wants to marry, including those heterosexuals who divorce. what the what, IFI?


  32. - Eleanore - Friday, Nov 30, 12 @ 11:47 am:

    Given that marriage has always been a natural institution recognizing a comprehensive conjugal union whose public purpose is to proactively protect children’s right to a relationship with both of the people who brought them into being, and revisionists want it to become a state-recognized union of any two persons for the purposes of conferring government subsidies, one can kind of see Mr. Smith’s point.


  33. - wordslinger - Friday, Nov 30, 12 @ 12:10 pm:

    Eleanore, that has to be the most ridiculous alleged sentence of the year.

    It has many high-minded words, but thrown together, they make no sense whatsoever.

    Break it down and you’ll understand.


Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.


* Rauner react
* Organized labor's response
* Yesterday's blog posts

Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............


Search This Blog...

Search the 98th General Assembly By Bill Number
(example: HB0001)

Search the 98th General Assembly By Keyword

          
        * Huawei Ascend Mate S hands on
        * Toshiba unveils trio of powerful, versatile and stylish Windows 10 convertibles at IFA
        * Find your Luminid Touch and Flash charging cable even in the dark
        * Last-minute Apple TV 4 rumors include $149 price tag, A8 chip, no 4K
        * New Google Nexus phones launching this September 29
        * LG G4 Note rumors circle back to removable battery, G4 Graphy and G4 Script also trademarked
        * Apple iPhone 7 tipped to get back to display tech roots for possible resolution upgrade

        * Rodon sharp over 6, but offense falls flat
        * White Sox arms of the future up to the task vs. Sano
        * Rodon sharp over 6, but offense falls flat
        * Montas returns with a much-improved slider
        * Back at short, Saladino looks to find niche with Sox
        * Samardzija looks to get back on track vs. Twins
        * White Sox paying David Robertson a lot, but getting a lot

        ...............


        Main Menu
        Home
        Illinois
        YouTube
        Pundit rankings
        Obama
        Subscriber Content
        Durbin
        Burris
        Blagojevich Trial
        Advertising
        Updated Posts
        Polls

        Archives
        September 2015
        August 2015
        July 2015
        June 2015
        May 2015
        April 2015
        March 2015
        February 2015
        January 2015
        December 2014
        November 2014
        October 2014
        September 2014
        August 2014
        July 2014
        June 2014
        May 2014
        April 2014
        March 2014
        February 2014
        January 2014
        December 2013
        November 2013
        October 2013
        September 2013
        August 2013
        July 2013
        June 2013
        May 2013
        April 2013
        March 2013
        February 2013
        January 2013
        December 2012
        November 2012
        October 2012
        September 2012
        August 2012
        July 2012
        June 2012
        May 2012
        April 2012
        March 2012
        February 2012
        January 2012
        December 2011
        November 2011
        October 2011
        September 2011
        August 2011
        July 2011
        June 2011
        May 2011
        April 2011
        March 2011
        February 2011
        January 2011
        December 2010
        November 2010
        October 2010
        September 2010
        August 2010
        July 2010
        June 2010
        May 2010
        April 2010
        March 2010
        February 2010
        January 2010
        December 2009
        November 2009
        October 2009
        September 2009
        August 2009
        July 2009
        June 2009
        May 2009
        April 2009
        March 2009
        February 2009
        January 2009
        December 2008
        November 2008
        October 2008
        September 2008
        August 2008
        July 2008
        June 2008
        May 2008
        April 2008
        March 2008
        February 2008
        January 2008
        December 2007
        November 2007
        October 2007
        September 2007
        August 2007
        July 2007
        June 2007
        May 2007
        April 2007
        March 2007
        February 2007
        January 2007
        December 2006
        November 2006
        October 2006
        September 2006
        August 2006
        July 2006
        June 2006
        May 2006
        April 2006
        March 2006
        February 2006
        January 2006
        December 2005
        April 2005
        March 2005
        February 2005
        January 2005
        December 2004
        November 2004
        October 2004

        Blog*Spot Archives
        November 2005
        October 2005
        September 2005
        August 2005
        July 2005
        June 2005
        May 2005

        Syndication

        RSS Feed 2.0
        Comments RSS 2.0
        WordPress

        Loading


        * EXCHANGE: Schaumburg teen's dental visit changes state law
        * Former Woodstock middle school principal accused of theft
        * Chicago sprays for mosquitoes to fight West Nile virus
        * Wheaton lawyer accused of bilking estates of clients
        * Will County seeing record year for wildlife with rabies
        * Rauner wins labor fight; Illinois House fails override
        * Illinois authorities searching for escaped prisoner
        * The Latest: Child care restoration fails in Illinois House
        * City of Peoria, creator of Twitter parody settle lawsuit
        * Officials begin process of dissolving Belleville Township

        * Illinois House comes up 3 votes shy of overriding union arbitration bill
        * Bill to stop Illinois State Museum closure advances in House
        * Override effort on union arbitration bill fails in House
        * Legionnaires' disease cases rise at Quincy veterans home
        * Union arbitration override fails in House
        * Illinois House Democrats seek to override Gov. Rauner on union arbitration
        * Veto override vote looms in Illinois House
        * All Democrats present as veto override vote looms in Illinois House
        * Illinois House faces crucial vote on union arbitration bill
        * United Way advance keeps Helping Hands shelter open as state budget impasse continues

        * Will more McMuffins mean more expensive eggs?
        * How has Chicago prepared for an oil train derailment?
        * Mattress startup Casper takes aim at Chicago
        * Motor Row Craft Beer & Wine Fest, a fringe theater fest and more
        * How to succeed in manufacturing


          * Woman charged with faking report about suspects in Fox Lake cop killing
          * Emanuel set to call for largest property tax hike in modern Chicago history
          * Security ushers Emanuel away as Dyett protesters take to stage at budget hearing
          * Pope Francis comforts Chicago high school student over loss of her father
          * 10 people shot dead, including 11-year-old boy, since late Tuesday in Chicago
          * Rauner prevails on major labor bill as Madigan fails to muster votes


          * Our Opinion: Panhandling deserves a community response
          * Bernard Schoenburg: Ex-Schock aide says he saw red flags
          * Norbert Brauer: Trans Pacific Partnership a secretive, one-sided deal
          * George Will: The blood-stained Indian Child Welfare Act
          * Eugene Robinson: Digging a hole to build a wall
          * Illinois House comes up 3 votes shy of overriding union arbitration bill
          * Bill to stop Illinois State Museum closure advances in House
          * Legionnaires' disease cases rise at Quincy veterans home


          * Rich Warren: Taking a byte out of your data usage
          * Tolono debating hunt to deal with coyotes
          * Notes-Worthy: Aaron Short and Carrie Chandler
          * Strum together: Ellnora launches at Krannert
          * Area guitar 'heroes' getting in on the act
          * Computer audit criticizes former employees' use
          * Chuck Koplinski: A surprising turn in 'Phoenix'
          * No leads in possible threats that brought lockdown to PBL schools
          * Film capsules, Sept. 3, 2015
          * 25 tons of corn arrives, to planners' great relief


          * Woman charged with falsifying report that led to Volo manhunt
          * Dawn Patrol: New, late-night manhunt in Volo, Lakemoor; Fox Lake cop remembered
          * Slain cop's wife to hundreds at vigil: 'My world got a little bit smaller'
          * Former Woodstock middle school principal accused of theft
          * The Latest: Police say lie prompts Illinois police response

          * House lawmakers overcome hurdle on key tra...
          * Rodney Davis talks funding with Bloomingto...
          * The agency that fought Illiana gets a new ...
          * Rep. Dold takes educational cruise down Ch...
          * Lawmakers decry high turnover rate of VA h...
          * CBD Oil, and politics
          * Simon considering state Senate bid
          * Killer Congressman Tom MacArthur trying to...
          * Shutdown? State may not notice
          * Rep. Bob Dold

          * Northerly Island Park opens Friday on Chic......

          * Sen. Kirk calls attention to International......

          * SportsMonday: Breaking Bears Assumptions
          * Local Music Notebook: AAHH! No
          * Keeping retirement weird. Call your state rep.
          * Eric Zorn does it again. Talking with the #FightForDyett hunger strikers is negotiating with “hostage takers.”
          * #FightforDyett protest chases Rahm from the hall.
          * On September 22 Mayor Rahm will fast for one day.
          * Newly Installed Parking Meters In Kenwood Outrage Some Residents
          * “The Driver’s Side” – News From The Motorist’s Perspective
          * Clerks' duties are sacred, not holier-than-thou. They sometimes forget that
          * Trump brings bad name to people who want to lambast ‘politically correct’


          * Legionnaires’ Disease Cases in Quincy
          * Legionnaires’ Disease Outbreak at Illinois Veterans’ Home-Quincy Update
          * Governor Bruce Rauner Proclaims Workforce Development Week
          * Veteran Spouse Ada Ruth Cripps Honored As The IDVA Volunteer of the Year
          * State-Teamsters One Step Closer to Finalizing Agreement




              Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller