SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      Mobile Version     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact
CapitolFax.com
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
Sponsors: Gay marriage vote in January

Thursday, Dec 13, 2012

* I should have more for subscribers tomorrow, but if they say they’re running the bill, then they apparently have the votes

Legal gay marriage may be coming to Illinois as soon as next month.

After counting heads and consulting with legislative leaders, the chief sponsors of a bill to permit same-sex couples to get married in the state this morning disclosed they intend to push for a vote in the General Assembly’s lame-duck session, which will occur over two weeks just after New Year’s.

And, in an indication of how big a campaign the pro side is launching, they’ve hired the firm founded by top presidential adviser David Axelrod to help them with media, organization and outreach to potential supporters, including corporate officials.

As recently as a couple of weeks ago, sponsors had indicted that a January vote was highly unlikely with several other big measures likely to take precedence, including reform of state pension plans and a gambling bill that would authorize a Chicago casino.

But that has changed.

- Posted by Rich Miller        


40 Comments
  1. - Robert the Bruce - Thursday, Dec 13, 12 @ 12:05 pm:

    Good to see Illinois catching up with other progressive states!

    Amazing how fast public opinion has moved on this in the last decade. It seems to me that it has moved faster than could be solely explained by new 18 year-olds taking the place of older voters dying. Rather, some folks in each generation must be changing their opinions.


  2. - vise77 - Thursday, Dec 13, 12 @ 12:17 pm:

    Robert: You may have a point. I can speak only to older relatives in my Downstate Catholic family, but for them, I think it’s a case of just knowing and liking gay people (who in many cases came out of the closet fully at work or within families within the past 10-15 years). I think some–some–of my relatives were utterly shocked at how normal gay people were, as though expecting some big dance party or parade every weekend. In this case, most of the people I’m thinking about are rather boring homebodies. That helped with my older relatives, even those who take Mass once or twice a week. It helped to soothe what I considered their irrational fear of gay people.


  3. - Roadiepig - Thursday, Dec 13, 12 @ 12:17 pm:

    About time. Marriages preformed by courts ( as mine was 32+ years ago) should be doing this anyway, and all the legal protections given to heterosexual couples should also apply to married gays and lesbians. It really is a civil rights issue.

    Churches who don’t agree with gay marriage should be allowed to pass on performing ceremonies without government intervention though. If I were gay I wouldn’t want to be a member of a church that didn’t want me there anyway…


  4. - Wensicia - Thursday, Dec 13, 12 @ 12:24 pm:

    ==Churches who don’t agree with gay marriage should be allowed to pass on performing ceremonies without government intervention though.==

    The First Amendment prevents this from happening.


  5. - Formerly Known As... - Thursday, Dec 13, 12 @ 12:32 pm:

    Wow! Just picture Chicago 6 months from now:

    Gay and straight couples, armed to their teeth, celebrating their marriages at the new casino. Afterwards, they can stop by the medical dispensary across the street and pick up some marijuana.

    It’s a brave new world. And all during one veto-lame duck session!

    Now about that pension mess…


  6. - Undercover - Thursday, Dec 13, 12 @ 12:43 pm:

    Ah, Greg Harris. Every state should have a Greg Harris, but alas, he’s one of a kind. A true leader. We’re very blessed to have him here.


  7. - anon - Thursday, Dec 13, 12 @ 12:52 pm:

    Roadiepig, churches already can and do pass on performing marriages, such as interfaith marriages…that’s already how the law works.


  8. - reformer - Thursday, Dec 13, 12 @ 1:00 pm:

    If the have the votes, then one or both of two things must have happened:
    1) Madigan must have decided it’s safe to let his targets vote for it. Last year they wanted targets off the civil unions bill.
    2) Republicans who voted NO on civil unions have had an epiphany and now embrace the whole enchilada. Which would be quite a flip in a short time. I guess I could see Mathias voting for it.


  9. - Just Observing - Thursday, Dec 13, 12 @ 1:03 pm:

    If it actually a happens… this will be a welcome change to Illinois.


  10. - Joe Bidenopoulous - Thursday, Dec 13, 12 @ 1:14 pm:

    “Legal gay marriage may be coming to Illinois as soon as next month.”

    Thank God! Illegal gay marriage has been undermining society for decades.

    Nice turn of phrase, Hinz!


  11. - Roadiepig - Thursday, Dec 13, 12 @ 1:28 pm:

    Wensicia - Thursday, Dec 13, 12 @ 12:24 pm:

    ==Churches who don’t agree with gay marriage should be allowed to pass on performing ceremonies without government intervention though.==

    The First Amendment prevents this from happening.

    Winsicia- please read this informative article on the gay marriage and the 1st amendment. Some who oppose gay marriage spread that false notion to get folks against the principle. Its just not true:

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jay-michaelson/straight-talk-about-gay-marriage-4-points-for-undecided-voters-to-consider_b_2047589.html


  12. - Mary Sunshine - Thursday, Dec 13, 12 @ 1:31 pm:

    Robert, you are right. And credit goes to our gay legislators who have worked not only on this issue but have become leaders in so many areas and earned the respect of their colleagues on both sides of the aisle - changing the dynamic of this issue and allowing a much more personal and much less political discussion among members about marriage equality. In addition to Harris’ amazing strides on this issue, Deb Mell is a quiet but steady voice of reason and common sense in the Democratic caucus, and is well liked by all. And Kelly Cassidy, who in her first term has shown incredible leadership on criminal justice issues, doesn’t shy away from the heavy lifts and is a real rising star in the House. Thanks to each of them for laying the groundwork and getting us poised and ready to take this important step forward.


  13. - Roadiepig - Thursday, Dec 13, 12 @ 1:33 pm:

    Wensicia- Sorry if I misinterpreted your post if you were saying that the 1st amendment ALLOWS churches to opt out of performing ceremonies. I have heard several people recently who have used the “My church will have to marry gays. What’s next- men and dogs” excuse for their opposition…


  14. - Wensicia - Thursday, Dec 13, 12 @ 1:55 pm:

    ==if you were saying that the 1st amendment ALLOWS churches to opt out of performing ceremonies==

    I was; sorry for the lack of clarity. Government cannot force religious organizations to perform gay marriages.


  15. - Proud - Thursday, Dec 13, 12 @ 2:21 pm:

    Roadie Pig you are right on. I know the Catholic church currently does not recognize a marriage that is not performed by a Catholic Priest as it is considered a sacrament. So what is the governments arguement(I dont think they really have one) about this civil right for homosexuals!


  16. - MrJM - Thursday, Dec 13, 12 @ 2:29 pm:

    MrsJM and I fully support this extension of civil rights to our gay brothers and sisters despite its inevitable undermining of our Traditional Marriage™.

    – MrJM


  17. - Meanderthal - Thursday, Dec 13, 12 @ 2:54 pm:

    Will there be hearings held where clergy and supporters of traditional marriage can express a different view? Back in the day, the Illinois General Assembly used to hold hearings on important issues and then draft the legislation. It also let opponents let off some steam even when they were going to get rolled. They might want to do that here.
    Also, what will happen to civil unions in Illinois if same sex marriage is passed? Will all couples (same sex and different sex) then have the option of civil union or a marriage?


  18. - casey - Thursday, Dec 13, 12 @ 2:55 pm:

    OK, since morality and the Bible and the whole mariage is defined as between a man and a woman is now thrown out the window, what is preventing polygomy from being allowed ? Who is the government to stand between three (or more) people that love each other from a till death do us part ability to enter the marriage contract ?


  19. - Rich Miller - Thursday, Dec 13, 12 @ 3:11 pm:

    ===what is preventing polygomy from being allowed ?===

    No lobbyist.

    lol


  20. - Phobic - Thursday, Dec 13, 12 @ 3:25 pm:

    A brave new world indeed - brought to you by Joes Garage.


  21. - titan - Thursday, Dec 13, 12 @ 3:41 pm:

    @ casey - I have a wife, and recently set a daughter off to live on her own (largely self supporting). I don’t think I could handle any more women in my life.
    But it is an interest point. If not just one man & one woman, why not more than 2 people (of whatever sex)? It could wreck estate tax collections and some other benefits programs.


  22. - Guzzlepot - Thursday, Dec 13, 12 @ 3:53 pm:

    Lol Formerly Known As. Thanks for the laugh.

    All of those are good things I think.


  23. - walkinfool - Thursday, Dec 13, 12 @ 4:12 pm:

    @Reformer: Though I find we usually agree, my guess is that you’re wrong on both points. I recall that Madigan did not direct targets on the Civil Union bill, but rather said to “vote your conscience.” (Some reps directly told him and his staff to not even try to suggest their votes.) And my guess is that Matthias, so moderate and open on many issues, is pretty conservative on this one.

    I think the movement is simply in response to rapidly changing cultural values in our country.


  24. - LincolnLounger - Thursday, Dec 13, 12 @ 4:22 pm:

    Formerly Known As came up with the funniest post I have ever seen on here. Thanks for the laugh.


  25. - TooManyJens - Thursday, Dec 13, 12 @ 4:37 pm:

    If there are valid arguments against polygamy other than “it’s not one man and one woman” (as I think there are, though I also think there are valid arguments for it), then those arguments are still valid whether or not same-sex couples can get married.


  26. - casey - Thursday, Dec 13, 12 @ 4:50 pm:

    Other than the morality of it, which is now a thing of the past, what are the valid “arguments” against consensual polygamy (and not bigamy) other than it is not one’s own personal taste ?


  27. - just sayin' - Thursday, Dec 13, 12 @ 4:50 pm:

    Oh darn I was hoping this issue would stay alive for the gop gubernatorial primary.

    But should still be fun watching what Dillard and Bill Brady do on any senate vote. I’m guessing they’ll vote no, but Dillard will be fretting a lot about it. Probably make himself sick so he’ll have to be absent that day.


  28. - Anonymous - Thursday, Dec 13, 12 @ 4:55 pm:

    walkin
    I know for a fact that a Dem target was told by staff to vote no on civil unions. He did something unusual for him and fought this direction, staff eventually relented, and he voted Yes. Staff was wrong in thinking a Yes vote would hurt him, since he was re-elected without opposition. Perhaps that experience helped persuade the Speaker to let his targets vote for marriage equality.


  29. - (618)Democrat - Thursday, Dec 13, 12 @ 5:51 pm:

    I hope they take the vote and I hope it passes. It is long overdue!


  30. - Peggy So-IL - Thursday, Dec 13, 12 @ 6:37 pm:

    There’s no state interest in recognizing relationships between 2 men or 2 women, but they are free to enter into any kind of relationship they want, otherwise.

    Down the road, however, when the consequences of illegitimacy (a problem across races) are too much for the state and society (in terms of crime, public aid, etc), the state will come up with some sort of legal arrangement specific to male-female unions to ensure that the man is tied to his child and the woman with whom he creates the child. They won’t call it marriage, and it won’t apply to relationships between 2 men or 2 women b/c it’s not the same state interest. It will serve the intended purpose of what has been a civil marriage license. They’ll have to rebuild what we have torn down.


  31. - Small Town Liberal - Thursday, Dec 13, 12 @ 7:32 pm:

    Peggy, what on earth are you talking about? Nothing whatsoever is changing about the responsibilities of parents. You’re just making things up to support your disgust with homosexuality.


  32. - Peggy So-IL - Thursday, Dec 13, 12 @ 7:53 pm:

    The purpose of civil marriage is to ensure that men are responsible for the children they create with women–that each man is tied to one woman with whom he procreates. (We don’t have to get to religious arguments for hetero monogamous marriage, just social stability reasons.) Marriage has gone out of vogue to the detriment of women, children and society at large. At the same time, however, homosexuals claim that their relationships are just like marriage and deserve state recognition and tax benefits. They are not the same. 2 men and 2 women are not “similarly situated” as a man and a woman. Biology and history bear that out. The state interest is not in people’s feelings, but in the welfare of children that may issue from a union.


  33. - Formerly Known As... - Thursday, Dec 13, 12 @ 9:34 pm:

    Thanks @Guzzlepot & @LincolnLounger! Happy to oblige.


  34. - Skeptic - Friday, Dec 14, 12 @ 8:25 am:

    Peggy: So what you’re saying is that a “family” with two same-sex parents (or two unmarried parents for that matter) is by definition less of a family and ought to be discouraged? And that a family with two married opposite sex parents is always superior?


  35. - Chevy owner/Ford County - Friday, Dec 14, 12 @ 8:25 am:

    Peggy, I’m sorry that you had to have a marriage in order to shackle your husband to supporting the children who had the misfortune of being created in your household. Given your apparent disdain for men, I can see why the long arm of the law might be necessary to keep him around. Some of us men don’t need government to force that responsibility upon us.


  36. - Small Town Liberal - Friday, Dec 14, 12 @ 8:35 am:

    - The purpose of civil marriage is to ensure that men are responsible for the children they create with women–that each man is tied to one woman with whom he procreates. -

    Peggy, I think you’re getting “civil marriage” confused with “shotgun weddin’”.


  37. - TooManyJens - Friday, Dec 14, 12 @ 9:27 am:

    ==Other than the morality of it, which is now a thing of the past, what are the valid “arguments” against consensual polygamy (and not bigamy) other than it is not one’s own personal taste ? ==

    It seems like there would be some hairy logistical issues. There’s also the fact that polygamy is practiced in an abusive way by some religious sects (not that making it illegal stops that, but you wouldn’t want to give legal sanction to it).

    These aren’t really absolute arguments against recognizing plural marriage, so much as things that would be very difficult and that we’d need to think about very carefully first.


  38. - Jaded - Friday, Dec 14, 12 @ 9:31 am:

    I still can’t believe they have a better chance of passing this in January than they would with 40 and 71 next Spring, but if that is the case, then that certainly isn’t a ringing endorsement for the changing public sentiment on this issue. If the public wants it, pass it next spring with greater Democratic majorities.

    Of course if gaming is rolling off the table, and pension reform looks doubtful, I guess they need some reason to bring people back the day of New Years Day and look like their doing something “important.”


  39. - TooManyJens - Friday, Dec 14, 12 @ 9:31 am:

    ==The purpose of civil marriage is to ensure that men are responsible for the children they create with women–that each man is tied to one woman with whom he procreates.==

    That is *a* purpose of civil marriage. It has lots of others, most of which are as applicable to same-sex couples as opposite-sex ones.


  40. - Peggy So-IL - Friday, Dec 14, 12 @ 5:07 pm:

    Wow.
    1. Many sociological studies show married bio parents as best situation for children. Even shack-up bio households not as effective. (I just saw some studies looking at Dan Quayle’s Murphy Brown deal 20 yrs later.)
    2. I am an anti-feminist. Feminists did not win freedom for women by liberating us sexually. We’re stuck with the kids alone or we may kill them if we are abandoned by the men. Men are off the hook now. The feminists offer an empty bag of goods to women.
    3. Happily married with lovely children.
    4. One day it may be shotgun weddings when budgets and social disarray are so great that any man abandoning his children and their mother is so intolerable. Single motherhood is NOT working for the poor & uneducated, if you haven’t noticed.
    5. Individuals have many motives for marriage, the primary concern to the state is the welfare of the children. Property etc can be handled by contracts, which same-sex people can pursue rather than turn society upside down for the 1%.


Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.


* Frerichs says Cross is Rauner's "lapdog"
* Poll: Rauner leading by 6, Topinka up by 22, Cross up by 10
* Pumping up the base
* NRI head will testify next week
* *** UPDATED x1 *** Another day, another GTCR revelation
* Rate Rauner's three new TV ads
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Supplement to today’s edition: Congressional crosstabs
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today's edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)
* Good morning, everybody!
* Yesterday's blog posts

Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...

...............

...............


Search This Blog...

Search the 98th General Assembly By Bill Number
(example: HB0001)

Search the 98th General Assembly By Keyword

          
        * Sony Xperia Z3 vs Sony Xperia Z2 (video)
        * LG F60 rocks quad-core processor and 2100 mAh battery
        * New color option rumored for upcoming iPad launch
        * Basis announces new Peak fitness and sleep tracker
        * Hands-on: Pebble gets a boost with lower price and new firmware
        * Path Talk now allows you to message businesses in new update
        * Apple silently edits Apple Watch promo video, makes screen smaller

        * Maintain a "No List" to See How Your Time Could've Been Wasted
        * Are Bugs Like Shellshock and Heartbleed Really Serious, or Just Hype?
        * FreedomPop Liberty And Frenzy Tablets Unveiled Starting At $89
        * Speck ShowFolio Case for iPad Mini – A Folio Case That Brings Peace to the Backseat
        * Boomerang Now Allows Location-Based Reminders for Your Email
        * Sony Xperia Z3 Lands In Canada October 31st
        * The New York Times’ App Plan Isn’t Working, So It’s Laying Off Staff

        * Guide to American League rooting interests for White Sox fans
        * Anderson, Edwards prospects to watch in AFL
        * Manager notes: How Robin Ventura and Chris Sale get along
        * Voting underway to decide Hank Aaron Awards
        * Development of young core in '15 can define Chicago's future
        * Improved White Sox take important step in 2014
        * September call-ups report card: position players


        Main Menu
        Home
        Illinois
        YouTube
        Pundit rankings
        Obama
        Subscriber Content
        Durbin
        Burris
        Blagojevich Trial
        Advertising
        Updated Posts
        Polls

        Archives
        October 2014
        September 2014
        August 2014
        July 2014
        June 2014
        May 2014
        April 2014
        March 2014
        February 2014
        January 2014
        December 2013
        November 2013
        October 2013
        September 2013
        August 2013
        July 2013
        June 2013
        May 2013
        April 2013
        March 2013
        February 2013
        January 2013
        December 2012
        November 2012
        October 2012
        September 2012
        August 2012
        July 2012
        June 2012
        May 2012
        April 2012
        March 2012
        February 2012
        January 2012
        December 2011
        November 2011
        October 2011
        September 2011
        August 2011
        July 2011
        June 2011
        May 2011
        April 2011
        March 2011
        February 2011
        January 2011
        December 2010
        November 2010
        October 2010
        September 2010
        August 2010
        July 2010
        June 2010
        May 2010
        April 2010
        March 2010
        February 2010
        January 2010
        December 2009
        November 2009
        October 2009
        September 2009
        August 2009
        July 2009
        June 2009
        May 2009
        April 2009
        March 2009
        February 2009
        January 2009
        December 2008
        November 2008
        October 2008
        September 2008
        August 2008
        July 2008
        June 2008
        May 2008
        April 2008
        March 2008
        February 2008
        January 2008
        December 2007
        November 2007
        October 2007
        September 2007
        August 2007
        July 2007
        June 2007
        May 2007
        April 2007
        March 2007
        February 2007
        January 2007
        December 2006
        November 2006
        October 2006
        September 2006
        August 2006
        July 2006
        June 2006
        May 2006
        April 2006
        March 2006
        February 2006
        January 2006
        December 2005
        April 2005
        March 2005
        February 2005
        January 2005
        December 2004
        November 2004
        October 2004

        Blog*Spot Archives
        November 2005
        October 2005
        September 2005
        August 2005
        July 2005
        June 2005
        May 2005

        Syndication

        RSS Feed 2.0
        Comments RSS 2.0
        WordPress

        Loading


        * Correction: Illinois Governor story..
        * Ex-director to testify at Illinois hearing..
        * Can Chicago's taxi industry survive the ridesha.....
        * Midterms Digest: Could America’s “most unpopula.....
        * October is national LGBT History Month..
        * Who’s Ahead In The Latest Polls For Illinois Go.....


        * DCFS again bans admissions to Springfield facility
        * Correction: Illinois Governor story
        * Amtrak adds amenities to Hoosier State line
        * Ex-director to testify at Illinois hearing
        * Lincoln Library at center of legislative hearing
        * Obama to arrive Wednesday in Chicago for visit
        * EIU joins Garoppolo hype with jersey offer
        * Appellate court agrees AFSCME workers owed money
        * Investigation prompts Dixon prison head to retire
        * DeWitt County lawyer pleads guilty to drug charges

        * ALPLM at center of legislative hearing in Chicago
        * Former head of anti-violence program to testify
        * Appellate court: State workers owed back wages
        * Quinn leans on top Democratic support — Obamas, Clinton
        * IDOC investigation prompts state prison warden to retire
        * Lawmaker panel plans to resume anti-violence program investigation
        * Quinn touts first year of Affordable Care Act
        * State-owned airplanes to be sold in online auction
        * GOP opposition to school funding bill irks Manar
        * Durbin, Oberweis debate background checks for guns

        * De Blasio signs order raising NYC living wage to $13.13
        * New intrigue in political war over Illiana expressway
        * Pat Tillman's widow launches a 'Stitch Fix' for kids out of Chicago
        * Pat Tillman's widow launches a Trunk Club for kids out of Chicago
        * Lawsuit alleges sperm bank got order wrong


        * Video shows Rauner opposing Medicaid expansion last year
        * Rauner’s biggest strength proving to be greatest weakness: Mihalopoulos
        * CPS students with good GPA could get free ride to City Colleges
        * Union: CPS was warned that janitor job cuts could cause problems
        * Lawyer: Key witness to answer questions from panel probing NRI
        * Emanuel super PAC rakes in $2.4 million since late June
        * Pedicab operators say city rules putting brakes on their business
        * IHSA to boycott legislative hearing set for Friday in Chicago
        * Quinn urges City Council to tighten reins on small digital signs
        * Man charged with killing girlfriend, 7-year-old daughter


        * Man wounded by gunfire walks into South Side hospital
        * Pro-Emanuel PAC raises another $1 million
        * Oversized bra sculpture aims to raise breast cancer awareness
        * DNA leads to charges in 6 rapes dating back to 2003
        * Man injured, 2 state trooper's cars damaged in I-355 accident
        * 16-year-old boy killed, 5 people injured in shootings in Chicago
        * Facebook post hints at a motive for fire at FAA radar center
        * Lawsuit: Wrong sperm delivered to lesbian couple
        * Prison warden retires after link to sex offender
        * Police alert: Woman sexually assaulted in Lincoln Park


        * Decatur Unemployment Shows Biggest Drop In Nation
        * Quinn Lauds Affordable Care Act, Backs Down From State Marketplace
        * A Redo On Redistricting
        * Polls Showing Illinois Governor's Race A Draw
        * Bruce Rauner, Before He Was A Candidate (Author Interview)
        * Listen to State Week - September 19, 2014
        * Clearing The Air On Clean Air Plan
        * Meet Bishop Blase Cupich, Chicago's incoming archbishop
        * After the accident: Metra and pedestrian fatalities
        * Cupich to be next Chicago archbishop


        * ALPLM at center of legislative hearing in Chicago
        * Former head of anti-violence program to testify
        * Michael Gerson: Two cheers for Obama, not three
        * Appellate court: State workers owed back wages
        * Quinn leans on top Democratic support — Obamas, Clinton
        * IDOC investigation prompts state prison warden to retire
        * Panel plans to resume anti-violence program probe
        * Lawmaker panel plans to resume anti-violence program investigation
        * Quinn touts first year of Affordable Care Act
        * State-owned airplanes to be sold in online auction


        * Road closure 10/1/14
        * Our View: Secrecy tears away at veneer of transparency
        * Jawun Evans commits to Oklahoma State
        * Two killed in Ford County crash
        * Market St. railroad bridge project delayed again
        * Koplinski on the movies: "Gone Girl" a must-see
        * Head-on crash closes Illinois 13 near New Athens
        * Who's That Illini? He built a dynasty
        * St. E's open house scheduled for Wednesday evening
        * Smog, pollution the biggest threats


        * Some good news about Ebola: It won't spread as fast as other epidemics
        * Mike North video: South Carolina giving 4-year scholarships
        * Chicago health official reassures public on Ebola in U.S.
        * Ebola case stokes concerns for Liberians in Texas
        * Questions and answers about the U.S. Ebola case

        * Representative Jan Schakowsky Sends Letter...
        * Rep. candidate pushes to uphold marriage b...
        * Reps. Schakowsky and Waxman Introduce Bill...
        * Statement by Representative Jan Schakowsky...
        * FAA Rejects Call For New O'Hare Noise Stud...
        * Representatives Quigley, Duckworth, Schako...
        * Representative Jan Schakowsky Statement on...
        * Representative Jan Schakowsky Statement in...
        * U.S. House Passes Resolution Condemning An...
        * Representative Jan Schakowsky Statement on...

        * Illinois gets $19 million for justice prog......
        * Illinois gets $19 million for justice prog......
        * Illinois gets $19 million for justice prog......
        * Illinois gets $19 million for justice prog......
        * Illinois gets $19 million for justice prog......

        * On The Campaign Trail, GOP Gov. Snyder Hig......
        * What Would A Partisan Shift In Control Of ......
        * Kirk Cameron Calls Homosexuality 'Unnatural'...

        * Chris Christie to keynote GOP lunch for Bost, Dold, Davis, Schilling, and Senger
        * Di Leo: Imagining the Possibilities of a Drop in the Bucket
        * John Dillon. Looking for a “fortiori,” a better reason to vote for Quinn.
        * John Dillon. Looking for “a fortiori,” a better reason to vote for Quinn.
        * Sunday reads.
        * CPS enrollment and tenured teacher layoff numbers. I’m trying to make meaning from the data.
        * IAR debuts housing data reports in Spanish
        * Morning Minute: REALTORS® expect home prices to see modest increases over next year
        * Where's Weyermuller? Lunching with ILGOP Chair Tim Schneider at City Club
        * Understanding Islamism [video]


        * Screwed Up
        * Jobs Governor
        * Wake Up
        * Rauner Launches Three New TV Ads
        * Quinn must take lame duck tax vote off the table




            Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller