SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      Mobile Version     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact
CapitolFax.com
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
Today’s graph

Tuesday, Jan 22, 2013

* President Obama’s inaugural address has put this polling graph back into play on the Interwebtubes

Notice that it wasn’t until the 1990s that a majority of Amerians finally approved of interracial marriage.

Thoughts?

- Posted by Rich Miller        


54 Comments
  1. - Anonymous - Tuesday, Jan 22, 13 @ 11:18 am:

    Are there state, regional or age cross-tabs available? It’s easy to look at this and assume that the 14% who don’t agree are old white people in the South, but it would be interesting to know. (Of course, this assumes that the 86% isn’t a vast overcount owing to people lying.)


  2. - Kasich Walker, Jr. - Tuesday, Jan 22, 13 @ 11:19 am:

    The “greatest” generation passes on.


  3. - MrJM - Tuesday, Jan 22, 13 @ 11:20 am:

    Hey, that arc does bend towards justice.

    – MrJM


  4. - The Captain - Tuesday, Jan 22, 13 @ 11:21 am:

    Wait, what’s the correlation between the President’s second inaugural address and this graph? The context escapes me.


  5. - Rich Miller - Tuesday, Jan 22, 13 @ 11:23 am:

    ===The context escapes me.===

    Then maybe you weren’t paying attention…

    ===We, the people, declare today that the most evident of truths – that all of us are created equal – is the star that guides us still; just as it guided our forebears through Seneca Falls, and Selma, and Stonewall; just as it guided all those men and women, sung and unsung, who left footprints along this great Mall, to hear a preacher say that we cannot walk alone; to hear a King proclaim that our individual freedom is inextricably bound to the freedom of every soul on Earth. […]

    It is now our generation’s task to carry on what those pioneers began… Our journey is not complete until our gay brothers and sisters are treated like anyone else under the law – for if we are truly created equal, then surely the love we commit to one another must be equal as well. ===


  6. - Ghost of John Brown - Tuesday, Jan 22, 13 @ 11:24 am:

    I was born in the period where the percentage was below 20%, and in the community where I was raised, the percentage might have been in the single digits.

    We have come a long way. My children’s generation doesn’t even pay much attention to race, and we live in a pretty “lily-white” suburb. My own son dated a girl that was half-black/half-white and it didn’t even dawn on him that it was in any way controversial.

    It’s a pleasant trendline.

    Past that - it has become a meaningless factoid - for that very reason.


  7. - Kasich Walker, Jr. - Tuesday, Jan 22, 13 @ 11:24 am:

    @ The Captain: the correlation is about as strong as that between the speech & the policies that will be put forth in term 2.


  8. - Grandson of Man - Tuesday, Jan 22, 13 @ 11:25 am:

    This is great news, as well as growing acceptance of marijuana legalization and gay marriage. The president also broke new ground in mentioning and supporting gay rights in the inaugural address.


  9. - wordslinger - Tuesday, Jan 22, 13 @ 11:28 am:

    –Notice that it wasn’t until the 1990s that a majority of Amerians finally approved of interracial marriage.–

    Amazing graph. In the early 70s, I remember the stir that was caused when an interracial couple and their children joined our church. Some serious arguments between parishioners who were troubled by it and those who actually stayed awake during the sermons.

    The same thing’s happening now with gay marriage. My kids think the whole “debate” is stupid beyond belief. Their kids will be very confused about what the fuss was about.


  10. - Skeeter - Tuesday, Jan 22, 13 @ 11:29 am:

    In hindsight, I question whether Irish should be allowed to marry Greeks.

    Actually, I probably shouldn’t joke about this. Right now about 1.5 in 10 still think there should be no interracial marriage which is just astounding.

    When we look at things like the birthers and much of the tea party, it all makes sense. There is still a core of this country that has not moved forward on race. There is still work to be done.


  11. - The Captain - Tuesday, Jan 22, 13 @ 11:31 am:

    Yeah that seems to be about gay marriage, your graph is about interracial marriage.


  12. - wordslinger - Tuesday, Jan 22, 13 @ 11:32 am:

    –In hindsight, I question whether Irish should be allowed to marry Greeks.–

    LOL, personal experience, I take it?


  13. - John A Logan - Tuesday, Jan 22, 13 @ 11:33 am:

    Look. A Kitty.


  14. - Demoralized - Tuesday, Jan 22, 13 @ 11:41 am:

    I think it’s great that the President chose to highlight the issue of equality as it pertains to gay marriage in his inauguration speech. The chart above is important because if we had let the majority decide on interracial marriage it would not have been legal until the 1990’s. It underscores the fact that the majority should NEVER get to decide on issues of equal rights. It’s irrelevant whether you agree or disagree with gay marriage. You don’t have a right to vote on issues of equality. If gay marriage offends your sensibilities, so be it. Nowhere are there any gurantees in the country that you can’t be offended. The future is now and those of you opposed had better get used to it. You don’t have to agree with it, but neither do you have a right to prevent it.


  15. - Rich Miller - Tuesday, Jan 22, 13 @ 11:43 am:

    ===Yeah that seems to be about gay marriage===

    You apparently can’t read, either.


  16. - Louis G. Atsaves - Tuesday, Jan 22, 13 @ 11:44 am:

    Wordslinger’s example of what occurred in his church in the 1970’s matches up with what happened in my father’s restaurant when I worked there during that era. An interracial couple would cause stirs with other tables signaling me with comments about “aren’t you going to do something about that?”

    And the restaurant was located in liberal Lincoln Park in Chicago! Times have changed. Makes someone in my age group wonder what the fuss was all about back then.


  17. - dave - Tuesday, Jan 22, 13 @ 11:49 am:

    This image — with graphs of the two sets of polling data (interracial marriage, marriage same-sex marriage) next to each other — is very encouraging for the future of marriage equality:

    http://tinyurl.com/atsaqdn


  18. - TooManyJens - Tuesday, Jan 22, 13 @ 11:50 am:

    When the President was born, over 90% of the population thought his parents’ marriage was at least immoral, and maybe should be illegal. He wouldn’t exist if they’d had their way. There’s your context.


  19. - Emanuel Kant - Tuesday, Jan 22, 13 @ 11:51 am:

    Don’t assume it’s only old Southern whites against interracial marriage.


  20. - Kerfuffle - Tuesday, Jan 22, 13 @ 12:04 pm:

    In the early to mid 70’s I dated a black girl for a time. I heard from both blacks and whites and neither side was supportive.


  21. - Dark Side of the Moon - Tuesday, Jan 22, 13 @ 12:04 pm:

    The kids today are colorblind - at least that’s what my 18 y/o has been telling for years. My Mexican mom married my African-American dad back in 1970. They are still married.

    My sisters and I have married German/Polish/Swedish descendants.

    So my thoughts on interracial marriage? Been there. Done that….and will do it again.. =)


  22. - Skirmisher - Tuesday, Jan 22, 13 @ 12:05 pm:

    I, like many other Americans in my age group (And a Southerner as well) have come full circle on this issue in the last 50-60 years. In today’s society, I am all in favor of any marriage at all when the awful alternative is to follow the current pop culture fashion and just make kids out of wedlock. By all means, get married, raise your kids responsibly, and I don’t care what racial mix is involved.


  23. - John Galt - Tuesday, Jan 22, 13 @ 12:06 pm:

    1) I’d definitely agree it’s demographics. Even in the mid 1990’s, I’m assuming that Gallup only asked adults. That means only a sliver of those adults polled even grew up in the 1980’s, when inter-racial marriage wasn’t seen as manifestly controversial. Most presumably came of age either in the 1970’s or prior, when attitudes were quite different.

    2) I can see the parallels to gay marriage, but I also have two points.

    First, I’m not an evangelical nor am I particularly well versed in the Bible. But my understanding is that their view against gay marriage is far more prominent and consistent over the generations than it was against inter-racial marriage. I don’t agree with it, but my understanding is that the case for resisting government mandates or regulations regarding gay marriage are a lot more credible than it was for resisting inter-racial marriages. To be clear, I don’t see any reason for government discrimination I think the Equal Protection Clause should allow same sex couples to enjoy all of the benefits of federal and state governmental designation of marriage. Where I do see legitimate debate is in the regulatory issues like the birth control mandates, Catholic Charities adoptive services, etc. They shouldn’t be getting state money of course, but the concept that the government can & will put a faith based organization (or even a private business owner who professes a faith based objection) in a box and basically tell them they can’t have a business permit, or must pay extra fines or fees, I find very troubling. It’s basically telling people that it’s OK to believe what you want, just as long as you check those beliefs at the door as you exit your home. In my view it should be the inverse–you should be able to express and exercise your beliefs as you wish(even if I don’t agree with them), but once you enter a government facility, a common transportation carrier, a public utility, etc, you need to check your beliefs at the door and realize that everybody should have access to those things. The Chick-Fil-A flap in Chicago earlier last year is a prime example. Rather than banning the operation of the business because they don’t agree or adhere to your personal beliefs, the proper response is to just organize economic boycotts among private citizens.

    2) I do think the normalization of gay marriage is inevitable, which is a good thing. However, although it is generational, I don’t think it’s 100% a straight line based on age groups. People’s views change over time, and generally as people get older they become more socially conservative. So to a certain extent, as an isolated cohort that ages over tie, as the youth demographic gets older, they won’t have such an overwhelming support for gay marriage. i.e., a certain percentage of the ambivalent or pro gay marriage youth now will turn into anti gay marriage or ambivalent gay marriage as they get older. That being said, as an overall impact, they will still tilt the scales towards gay marriage, especially as the older generations die off. Just making numbers up as an example: let’s say the overall pro gay marriage support is at 40%, whereas the youth cohort is currently at 75%. I think if you follow the same group of people as they grow from the youth cohort to the middle aged cohort, the support within THAT group might fall to say 70% or 60%. But as the older generations die off and as younger generations come up, the overall support percentage for the all adults will most certainly still rise from 40% up to solidly north of 50%.


  24. - illinifan - Tuesday, Jan 22, 13 @ 12:07 pm:

    To me this reflects how we are constantly evolving as a society…which is what his speech was about. His election is a reflection of a changing society and demographic. For many this change is scary so they fight hard to keep things as they were, while others embrace the changes and the future ahead. it is not necessarily geographic or age specific it is really about how we all cope with change. It would be interesting to see what history has to write about this time in 50 years.


  25. - train111 - Tuesday, Jan 22, 13 @ 12:09 pm:

    In 2001 when I (white) married across the race boundary (my wife is black) it caused a whole lot less stir in the family than when my mother’s cousin did the same thing in the early 70’s. Mom’s cousin was ostracized then, but now my mother gets to share mixed race grandchildren photos with her. Times have definitely changed.
    The gay marriage thing is now front and center in my family. Having moved away to the evil liberal big city, I am comfortable with it, but back home it is “If we don’t talk about it, then it really isn’t happenning.” Ten years will erase that away too most likely.

    train111


  26. - Yossarian Lives - Tuesday, Jan 22, 13 @ 12:10 pm:

    That 14% (who still disapprove of interracial marriage) is an even scarier number when you consider those are the people willing to admit to a pollster that they disapprove. How many of the 86% just aren’t saying they disapprove because that’s not politically correct anymore? It’s amazing we still have so far to go in the area of race relations, even with Pres. Obama in the White House for a second term.


  27. - Rich Miller - Tuesday, Jan 22, 13 @ 12:13 pm:

    My maternal grandmother was a southern Illinois German-American. She married a southern Illinois Scotch Irishman. It was a controversy back in the day.

    Can you imagine the howls of derision if anybody got upset about that today?

    Things change, usually for the better.


  28. - John Galt - Tuesday, Jan 22, 13 @ 12:20 pm:

    ===
    I am all in favor of any marriage at all when the awful alternative is to follow the current pop culture fashion and just make kids out of wedlock. By all means, get married, raise your kids responsibly, and I don’t care what racial mix is involved.
    ===

    This, I think is the argument that will be persuasive to the GOP. I think it’s inevitable that most of the party will come around to the pro gay marriage side of the issue. A major driver of poverty is single motherhood, and evangelical Christians aside, I think this could easily fall under the rubric of “pro family”. I think the gay marriage argument for the GOP will hinge around the idea of shoring up the economic middle class with a modernized version & reaffirmation the positive economic and socializing effects of raising kids in a nuclear family wherever possible. The evangelicals will die hard, of course, but if the GOP is smart they will focus the evangelical’s attention on the religious liberty aspects of gay marriage (that I discussed in the prior post), rather than fight the concept of governmental recognition of gay marriage generally.


  29. - train111 - Tuesday, Jan 22, 13 @ 12:21 pm:

    John Galt

    Do a little research and you will find that the Bible was indeed used to back up slavery, a separation of blacks and whites, prohibiting interracial marriage, and the whole gambit.
    Quite frankly, you can find a verse in the Bible to back up anything you want, and it certainly was used as a means of discouraging interracial relationships in the exact way that people use it today to discourage homosexual ones.

    train111


  30. - Rich Miller - Tuesday, Jan 22, 13 @ 12:24 pm:

    ===the Bible was indeed used to back up… a separation of blacks and whites, prohibiting interracial marriage===

    http://www.bibletools.org/index.cfm/fuseaction/Topical.show/RTD/Nave/ID/3419/Miscegenation.htm


  31. - Liberty_First - Tuesday, Jan 22, 13 @ 12:37 pm:

    What ever happened to the leftist claim you can’t legislate morality?


  32. - Newsclown - Tuesday, Jan 22, 13 @ 12:41 pm:

    Any right-wing conservative Republican party organizers paying attention to these stats? By the shape of recent campaigns, I’d have to say no. They play to an ever-shrinking segment of the population regarding these cultural taboos.


  33. - Rich Miller - Tuesday, Jan 22, 13 @ 12:41 pm:

    ===What ever happened to the leftist claim you can’t legislate morality? ===

    That slogan was aimed at laws which imposed morality on others.


  34. - Rich Miller - Tuesday, Jan 22, 13 @ 12:47 pm:

    …Adding… And I don’t see how racial mixing imposes any morality on anyone. You are free not to marry someone of a different race, or of the same gender, for that matter.


  35. - Xylem - Tuesday, Jan 22, 13 @ 12:48 pm:

    The trend line shows that progress is possible. It also portends that Republicans need to embrace their libertarian side (i.e. individual liberties) if they hope to succeed in future elections.


  36. - Votecounter - Tuesday, Jan 22, 13 @ 12:54 pm:

    Interracial marriage has always been legal in Illinois


  37. - OneMan - Tuesday, Jan 22, 13 @ 1:05 pm:

    ===What ever happened to the leftist claim you can’t legislate morality? ===

    Not really a leftist thing, Martin Luther was kind of big on the idea it was the church’s responsibility to save you not the government.

    Can’t legislate what is in your heart (thank God IMHO)


  38. - Ahoy! - Tuesday, Jan 22, 13 @ 1:09 pm:

    The graph provides a dichotomy of happiness and sadness. It’s obviously good news that we are trending upward and look forward to the day we are between 90 – 99% (I give up on 100% of anything) but it’s sad to see how long it took just to get to 86% approval of two people of different skin colors marrying. It also reminds us of how much more we have to go toward acceptance of both race and sexual orientation.

    I’m looking forward to attending the weddings of friends and family that are currently discriminated against by our government.


  39. - Lycurgus - Tuesday, Jan 22, 13 @ 1:16 pm:

    15% of Americans will oppose any proposition put to them by a pollster.


  40. - train111 - Tuesday, Jan 22, 13 @ 1:31 pm:

    Votecounter:

    “Interracial marriage has always been legal in Illinois.”

    Not true– Illinois statutes of 1845. “No person of color, negro or mulatto, of either sex, shall be joined in marriage with any white person, male or female, in this State; and all marriages or marriage contracts, entered into between such a colored person and a white person, shall be null and void in law; and any person so marrying or contracting to marry shall be liable to pay a fine, be whipped not less than thirty nine lashes, and be imprisoned, not less than one year, and shall be held to answer in no other than a criminal prosecution, by information or indictment.”

    It was repealed by 1874. Some pretty stiff penalties there.

    train111


  41. - Demoralized - Tuesday, Jan 22, 13 @ 1:33 pm:

    ==What ever happened to the leftist claim you can’t legislate morality? ==

    I’m not sure what your are getting at here. What I will say is that I’m always amazed by the disconnect in the conservative point of view when it comes to social matters versus economic matters. When it comes to government regulation of the economy, the argument is hands-off. But throw a social issue in there and conservatives seem to change course and are all for government intrusion. Perhaps somebody can explain that dichotomy to me. It’s not ok for the government to intrude in our economic lives, but it’s the government’s duty to intrude in our personal lives. Seems idiotic and inconsistent to me.


  42. - Small Town Liberal - Tuesday, Jan 22, 13 @ 1:34 pm:

    - Yeah that seems to be about gay marriage, your graph is about interracial marriage. -

    Yeah, when I think about those folks getting the fire hoses and dogs turned on them at Selma, all I can think about it what courage they showed standing up for gay marriage…


  43. - OpenlineBlog - Tuesday, Jan 22, 13 @ 1:47 pm:

    Leaving aside the logic to equate interracial marriage and gay marriage, lllinois prohibits marriages between first cousins, even though that is allowed in many other states and most nations, so if we really want to define marriage as anyone who loves another person, are we saying those standards only apply if you are gay? Where do you draw the line on “anyone who loves anyone” can get married?

    And, an attorney who is involved in politics, who happens to be gay, also cautioned, “be careful what you wish for” because the family court system and legal process in Illinois is dysfunctional, expensive and time-consuming, so with gay marriage, there will also be gay divorce.

    Divorce lawyers will have a whole new market and the already-dysfunctional legal system will get slowed down even more.

    Maybe those who support gay marriage should push for reforming our antiquated, dysfunctional legal system.


  44. - Cheswick - Tuesday, Jan 22, 13 @ 2:10 pm:

    train111: Wow. That floors me. I’m shaking my head see that in print. (Also, not that it matters to the conversation, but I had people already starting to come to Illinois before 1845.)


  45. - WazUp - Tuesday, Jan 22, 13 @ 2:21 pm:

    All you have to do is redefine what a race is. Next you redefine marriage which obviously wasn’t appropriately defined for the last several thousand years.


  46. - wordslinger - Tuesday, Jan 22, 13 @ 2:26 pm:

    ===What ever happened to the leftist claim you can’t legislate morality? ===

    What “leftist” said that?

    If I recall, Barry Goldwater said that when he voted against the Civil Rights Act of 1964. He went through some changes after he stopped running for president and became a great defender of civil rights for all.

    Goldwater would punch you in the nose if you peeked in his bedroom window and couldn’t care less how other people got down. He howled about how he thought the likes of Pat Robertson and Jerry Fawell were attempting to use government to shove a theocracy down our throats.

    Now that I think about it, I’m sure Goldwater was who you meant when you said “leftist.”

    Among today’s right-wing full-mooners (notice I don’t say “conservatives”), Barry Goldwater, Bill Buckley and Ronald Reagan would certainly be considered leftists.

    Reagan voted for FDR four times and was proud of it until the day the light went out — read his books. The Democratic Party left him, he said, he didn’t leave it. Millions agreed with him — remember the “Reagan Democrats?” More than the Republican Party, he changed the Democratic Party. Because they got tired of him pounding lumps on their heads. Lesson learned.

    Buckley brought the American conservative movement into the mainstream by giving it an intellectual foundation and driving out the Birchers and the racists.

    Who doesn’t miss those “leftists?”


  47. - downstate commissioner - Tuesday, Jan 22, 13 @ 2:26 pm:

    When I was younger, I would have disapproved because of the offspring of the marriage being subject to teasing, name-calling, bigotry, etc. Now, as I get older, given the too choices, I would probably say that I approve, which isn’t totally correct. I’m not sure that I actually approve, but I do accept it. Society has changed; where I grew up, there were no black people in town. Now there are a few, but more importantly, there are several mixed race children, including a step-grandchild of mine. For the most part, there doesn’t seem to be a racial problem in the schools, but the g-kid moved back to the bigger, more racially diverse city where his father lived, for his last two years of high school, partially because his dad and g-pa would be the only black people in that gym.


  48. - Common Sense - Tuesday, Jan 22, 13 @ 2:56 pm:

    The graph is an excellent reminder of the Confirmation Bias.

    There is a natural tendency to ignore any evidence that contradicts our own prejudices.


  49. - Shoeless - Tuesday, Jan 22, 13 @ 3:20 pm:

    What it says is that if we wait for the voters to approve marriage equality for same-sex couples across the nation, we could be waiting until, oh, 2050, give or take.


  50. - Cheryl44 - Tuesday, Jan 22, 13 @ 3:20 pm:

    “Illinois prohibits marriages between first cousins..”

    Not quite. If both are over 50 or one is diagnosed to be sterile, it’s legal.


  51. - steve schnorf - Tuesday, Jan 22, 13 @ 3:22 pm:

    Makes me think, and that is good


  52. - Cheryl44 - Tuesday, Jan 22, 13 @ 3:23 pm:

    I hit Enter too soon. I don’t see anything in any law that says you get to/have to marry someone you love, either. People get married for all sorts of reasons, none of which is the state’s business.


  53. - wordslinger - Tuesday, Jan 22, 13 @ 4:13 pm:

    –When I was younger, I would have disapproved because of the offspring of the marriage being subject to teasing, name-calling, bigotry, etc. Now, as I get older, given the too choices, I would probably say that I approve, which isn’t totally correct. I’m not sure that I actually approve, but I do accept it.–

    DC, good on you.

    You were raised a man of your parent’s time. My parents were different, too, in their own way, but I understand where you’re coming from.

    As a grown man, you took the best of your parents’ teachings — their goodness, decency and intelligence — and you adjusted.

    It’s guys like you who move life, liberty and pursuit of happiness, forward. The guys who have the guts and brains to change their minds.

    The world would not progress without men like you, who think anew.

    I’m sure your folks would be proud of you. I think you’re the bee’s knees. Here’s to you, cousin.


  54. - Demoralized - Tuesday, Jan 22, 13 @ 4:31 pm:

    ==All you have to do is redefine what a race is. Next you redefine marriage which obviously wasn’t appropriately defined for the last several thousand years. ==

    Yes, because things throughout history have never changed. That argument is moronic and has always been moronic.


Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.


* Rate Sheila Simon's new TV ad
* Poe set to begin transplant process, faces "extended" recovery
* Rauner runs new TV ad touting newspaper endorsements
* *** UPDATED x2 - "Comical" - "No interest" *** Despite shout-outs, Neely says she and Rauner haven't talked
* Grimm on 150 - Minimum wage battles in other states - The return of "Matt the Welder" - Rauner on "right to work"
* A bevy of new congressional TV ads
* Quinn tax hike dodge count: 4
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Supplement to today’s edition: Crosstabs, cable TV buys, ads
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today's edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)
* Today's number: 165
* A grand good morning to you all!
* Yesterday's blog posts

Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............


Search This Blog...

Search the 98th General Assembly By Bill Number
(example: HB0001)

Search the 98th General Assembly By Keyword

          
        * Samsung Galaxy SM-A300H appears at FCC without 4G LTE
        * S Pen lesson revisited: using the Galaxy Note 4′s stylus like a pro (Video)
        * Apple says Yosemite’s Spotlight Suggestions don’t violate your privacy
        * 5-inch HTC Desire 820 Mini accidentally leaked by website
        * New Mac mini restricts RAM and storage upgrades, but hints at PCIe SSD possibilities
        * Sony opens Xperia Z3 Tablet Compact US pre-orders
        * Nokia Brings Its HERE Maps App To All Supported Android Phones

        * What to Expect at Twitter’s First Mobile Developer Conference
        * Verizon Posts Higher Revenue, Falls Short of Profit Estimates
        * Vine Makes It Easier to Discover Great Vines Through Following Channels
        * ​Make the Switch from iOS to Android with Google's New Guide
        * Facebook tested feature that identified valuable, irrelevant fans
        * More fun with low-power Wi-Fi and IP cameras from Homeboy
        * How to Settle Debts When You Can't Pay Them Back

        * Reading Room: A wild card of a World Series
        * Following same path as '59 White Sox, KC eyes title
        * larry's Offseason Plan
        * Abreu wins Sporting News' AL Rookie of the Year honors
        * Jose Abreau wins the Sporting News AL Rookie of the Year
        * Jose Abreu wins the Sporting News AL Rookie of the Year
        * Lost in Isolation: A White Sox fan abroad.


        Main Menu
        Home
        Illinois
        YouTube
        Pundit rankings
        Obama
        Subscriber Content
        Durbin
        Burris
        Blagojevich Trial
        Advertising
        Updated Posts
        Polls

        Archives
        October 2014
        September 2014
        August 2014
        July 2014
        June 2014
        May 2014
        April 2014
        March 2014
        February 2014
        January 2014
        December 2013
        November 2013
        October 2013
        September 2013
        August 2013
        July 2013
        June 2013
        May 2013
        April 2013
        March 2013
        February 2013
        January 2013
        December 2012
        November 2012
        October 2012
        September 2012
        August 2012
        July 2012
        June 2012
        May 2012
        April 2012
        March 2012
        February 2012
        January 2012
        December 2011
        November 2011
        October 2011
        September 2011
        August 2011
        July 2011
        June 2011
        May 2011
        April 2011
        March 2011
        February 2011
        January 2011
        December 2010
        November 2010
        October 2010
        September 2010
        August 2010
        July 2010
        June 2010
        May 2010
        April 2010
        March 2010
        February 2010
        January 2010
        December 2009
        November 2009
        October 2009
        September 2009
        August 2009
        July 2009
        June 2009
        May 2009
        April 2009
        March 2009
        February 2009
        January 2009
        December 2008
        November 2008
        October 2008
        September 2008
        August 2008
        July 2008
        June 2008
        May 2008
        April 2008
        March 2008
        February 2008
        January 2008
        December 2007
        November 2007
        October 2007
        September 2007
        August 2007
        July 2007
        June 2007
        May 2007
        April 2007
        March 2007
        February 2007
        January 2007
        December 2006
        November 2006
        October 2006
        September 2006
        August 2006
        July 2006
        June 2006
        May 2006
        April 2006
        March 2006
        February 2006
        January 2006
        December 2005
        April 2005
        March 2005
        February 2005
        January 2005
        December 2004
        November 2004
        October 2004

        Blog*Spot Archives
        November 2005
        October 2005
        September 2005
        August 2005
        July 2005
        June 2005
        May 2005

        Syndication

        RSS Feed 2.0
        Comments RSS 2.0
        WordPress

        Loading


        * Pat Quinn challenger: 'I can't be bought' - Was.....
        * 2014 Governors Races: The Year of the Tossup..
        * Governor hopefuls disagree on charter schools..
        * Revolution Academy Teams Update..
        * Bill Clinton campaigns for Governor Quinn in Ch.....
        * Primary And Secondary Education..


        * Illinois' top educator: Funding problems to remain
        * Funeral set for basketball coach Wayne McClain
        * USDA: Illinois corn, soybean harvests slogs along
        * Bill Clinton to campaign for Quinn Tuesday
        * Illinois governor candidates spar on finance, jobs
        * Democrats love seeing minimum wage on the ballot
        * Quinn, Rauner debate income tax increase
        * Governor hopefuls disagree on charter schools
        * Illinois governor candidates spar in last debate
        * Police: Indiana suspect hints at more killings

        * Quinn, Rauner spar over jobs, taxes
        * Election 2014: Learn about all the candidates
        * What to watch for in third governor debate tonight
        * U of I sees turning point as election nears
        * Chicago Sun-Times endorses Rauner for governor
        * Sun-Times, Belleville, Champaign, Peoria newspapers endorse Rauner for governor
        * Bill Clinton to address workers at pro-Quinn rally
        * Body camera use concerns Illinois police officers
        * Illinois unemployment rate falls again, to 6.6 percent
        * Panel to look at body cameras in eavesdropping law discussion

        * Introducing a 3-D carving machine quiet enough for your home office
        * Tribune to buy Sun-Times suburban newspapers: report
        * McDonald's: 'By all measures our performance fell short of our expectations'
        * Final guv debate: taxes, jobs, schools
        * With a boost from Lurie, Central DuPage wants to expand


        * Father Bob Botthof, teacher who became priest after losing wife, dies at 85
        * Dr. Lawrence Solomon: Renowned dermatologist, book collector loved a mystery
        * Emanuel’s cable tax hike to cost average consumer $28.80 a year
        * Fix pot law conflicts so industry can grow
        * Chicago Public Schools to sell headquarters for $28 million
        * Cardinal George’s advice to Archbishop Cupich: ‘Spend a lot of time listening’
        * Convicted sex offender in custody after 7 bodies found in NW Indiana
        * Fioretti tries to put heat on Emanuel over short yellow lights
        * Neely’s pre-election resignation deja vu of how she got her start
        * Scholar’s take on bishops’ synod: ‘Amazing days if you’re a Catholic’


        * Man in critical condition after apparent battery at Bears tailgate party
        * 12 New Trier students sent to peer jury in sexting case
        * Regional jet makes emergency landing at DuPage County Airport
        * Bond raised to $7 million for suspect in shooting of 2 deputies
        * Tribune buying Sun-Times suburban newspapers
        * Foes, supporters speak out on New Trier tax increase request
        * Public input sought on Museum Campus plan
        * Staples probing possible payment card data breach
        * Cops: Boy, 17, fatally shot by officer after refusing to drop knife
        * Man killed, two people wounded in Dixmoor shooting


        * Jimmy Carter Brings Human Rights Mission To Jacksonville
        * Cheddar's Leaves Springfield WUIS-SJR Business Report
        * Area Cub Scouts Burned In Explosion
        * Notes On The Final Governor Debate
        * Task Force Hopes To Help Turn Students Into Good Citizens
        * Digging up the history of a Civil War camp on Chicago's South Side
        * Indiana suspect hints at more killings
        * Illinois' Medical Marijuana Program At Odds With Federal Policy
        * UIS Poverty Series Continues With "American Winter" Screening
        * Third & Final Governor Debate Tonight


        * Joanna McQuillan Weeks: Cheese balls deserve more respect
        * Our Opinion: White, Madigan for another term
        * Quinn, Rauner spar over jobs, taxes
        * Our Opinion: Say yes to Magro’s project
        * John Schick: Letter confirmed aggression toward bicyclists
        * Election 2014: Learn about all the candidates
        * U of I sees turning point as election nears
        * Our Opinion: Re-elect Durbin for another term in U.S. Senate
        * Bill Press: Do you trust your government on Ebola?
        * Quote of the Day: Monday, Oct. 20, 2014


        * Man killed in Foley Drive crash
        * Illinois' top educator: Funding problems to remain after election
        * Construction begins on Chicago-Moline rail line
        * SIU police probe latest reported sexual assault
        * CDC releases revised Ebola gear guidelines
        * Finding victims in Indiana case a lengthy process
        * Oscar Pistorius sentenced to 5 years in prison
        * Wayne McClain funeral live coverage
        * Bob Butler: 50 years as mayor and counting
        * Three injured in crash near Belleville


        * Construction begins on Chicago-Moline rail line
        * Principal saves student choking on corn dog
        * Suburban Cook County early voting off to strong start
        * Sun-Times' suburban papers to be sold to Tribune
        * Suspect in Va. abduction charged in DC area rape

        * Patrick Cannon defense strategy rare but n...
        * Feds fine Jesse Jackson Jr.'s campaign com...
        * Ex-Congressman Jesse Jackson Jr. faces sen...
        * Representative Jan Schakowsky Sends Letter...
        * Rep. candidate pushes to uphold marriage b...
        * Reps. Schakowsky and Waxman Introduce Bill...
        * Statement by Representative Jan Schakowsky...
        * U.S. House Passes Resolution Condemning An...
        * FAA Rejects Call For New O'Hare Noise Stud...
        * Representatives Quigley, Duckworth, Schako...

        * Democrats love seeing minimum wage on the ......
        * Dick Durbin bio...
        * Democrats love seeing minimum wage on the ......
        * Democrats love seeing minimum wage on the ......
        * Democrats love seeing minimum wage on the ......

        * Senator Mark Kirk: Congress Will Not Suppo......

        * Sheridan’s Ride
        * Obama in Chicago today to rally votes for Quinn
        * New Rauner ad touts endorsements [video]
        * Welcome early voters!
        * Polls show Oberweis gaining on Durbin
        * Mautino Wants To Be Illinois House Speaker One Day
        * O'Brien: Will Obama Let Ebola-infected foreigners come to U.S for treatment?
        * Stand for Children PAC supports SB16, donates to both Dems and Republicans
        * Batinick says Dunn's desperate campaign charges are "ridiculous"
        * New Polls: Illinois legislative races


        * New TV Ad: Endorsed
        * Rauner Campaign Statement on Final Debate
        * What They’re Saying About Pat Quinn
        * What They’re Saying About Bruce Rauner
        * Illinois EPA Registration of Smaller Sources Program Hits Program Landmark - 3,000 Illinois Small Businesses Benefit from Permit Streamlining




            Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller