SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      Mobile Version     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact
CapitolFax.com
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
In case you want your pension money back…

Thursday, Jan 24, 2013

* Every so often a few public employees will demand in comments to be allowed to withdraw all the money they contributed to their pension funds so they can invest it themselves. Well, if SB40 passes, they might be able to. From the bill’s synopsis

Provides that a person who is a member on the effective date of the amendatory Act may file a written notice of election not to participate in the General Assembly Retirement System within 24 months from the date of becoming a member or 18 months after the effective date of the amendatory Act, whichever is later. Provides that a person who makes that election shall, upon written request, receive a refund of his or her total contributions, without interest.

The bill is sponsored by Republican state Sen. Tim Bivins (R-Dixon).

…Adding… And, yes, the bill as written only applies to GARS. But it’s a step.

- Posted by Rich Miller        


44 Comments
  1. - wizard - Thursday, Jan 24, 13 @ 8:40 am:

    As someone noted yesterday, anyone who is close to retirement would withdraw it is not doing the math. It would be too late to realize a decent return on the dollars. However, someone just starting out might consider this option. One other thing, is that should an employee opt out, they should be required to set up an alternative plan, not just take the money as some would take the money and spend it. When one is young, he/she often is bullet proof and going to live forever. Retirment is not on the agenda.


  2. - Small Town Liberal - Thursday, Jan 24, 13 @ 8:45 am:

    Excuse my ignorance, but I don’t get it, doesn’t this only apply to GARS?


  3. - not really - Thursday, Jan 24, 13 @ 8:46 am:

    This bill only applies to GA pension participants. The rest of us can elect to take the money when we separate service (as a lump sum subject to tax or can roll into an IRA), but there is no way for a current employee to get the money out (either money already paid in or money going in from each check). I have heard of people resigning to get their money out (for a major purchase like a house) and coming right back onto the state roll, but this was years ago.


  4. - Dirt Diver - Thursday, Jan 24, 13 @ 8:56 am:

    An interesting story that not many are talking about….GARS is currently the worst funded State Retirement System, I believe it is around 25-30%. Which is interesting because it is also the smallest State fund. Due to this political grandstanding of opting out of GARS (mainly talking about those freshman legislators who denied to participate and who are also Tier 2) their actions of not participating in GARS will have a negative effect on the fund, and therefore on the state. Remember, Tier 2 is a great deal for the state. We want as many Tier 2 members as we can get, due to the fact that the benefit is so meager as compared to Tier 1. Tier 2 members also contribute at the same rate as Tier 1 members. Therefore, since these new members are not contributing, this is less assets coming into the fund, so now the difference will have to be made up by the State (GRF money). Another example of a campaign tactic that will have a negative fiscal impact on Illinois taxpayers.

    To SB 40, as far as Tier 1 GARS members opting out and receiving only their employee contributions as a refund, that would have a huge positive impact on the fund. I would like to FOIA that information (who takes such a refund) if this were ever to become law. Either that person is an idiot or is the most patriotic Illinois citizen I have ever met.


  5. - dupage dan - Thursday, Jan 24, 13 @ 8:57 am:

    Without interest? Other than someone wishing to do so at the start of a state career I can’t see many folks partaking.


  6. - foster brooks - Thursday, Jan 24, 13 @ 9:19 am:

    Tim bivins soon to be the recipient of two pensions. Yes folks 2 pensions.


  7. - Fred's Mustache - Thursday, Jan 24, 13 @ 9:33 am:

    I stand by my comment yesterday that such a move would be a poor financial decision for state employees. Id like to see what happens when your typical state employee tries to invest their pension contributions. Let me tell you that most are not going to be able to invest in a way that provides income anywhere near the amount they would receive from their pension.


  8. - PublicServant - Thursday, Jan 24, 13 @ 9:33 am:

    Exactly what I was thinking Dan. If they want to pass something like this to provide an option, let’s try to at least be fair to the employee, and give them interest based on the rate of return gotten by the pension systems over the time the payments have been in the fund.

    Also agree with Wizard. I think it’s a dumb move in any case.


  9. - PublicServant - Thursday, Jan 24, 13 @ 9:35 am:

    Besides, if the bill is sponsered by a Republican, I’d say employees beware.


  10. - PublicServant - Thursday, Jan 24, 13 @ 9:36 am:

    Of course the Dem bills are a joke too. LOL, let’s start a new party that puts the middle class first.


  11. - langhorne - Thursday, Jan 24, 13 @ 9:38 am:

    if i am not mistaken,newly elected decatur dem rep sue scherer has opted out of the GARS. she will have to squeak by on her $5,000 per month teacher’s pension, plus her $60,000+ legislator salary. this should allow her plenty of freedom from financial worry, so she can a) keep too much public funding from going to chicago, and b) go thru the budget line by line to straighten things out.


  12. - walkinfool - Thursday, Jan 24, 13 @ 9:41 am:

    “Dumb move, but looks good politically — I’ll do it.”

    That’s the thinking on too many issues.


  13. - Bluefish - Thursday, Jan 24, 13 @ 9:54 am:

    If a legislator opts out does he/she automatically go into Social Security instead? Seems cheaper for the state to keep underfunding GARS rather than be forced into SS payments for these legislators. The bill is silent on this.


  14. - Demoralized - Thursday, Jan 24, 13 @ 10:00 am:

    The state has done this before, only at that time you had to leave state government if you did it. My ex-wife took advantage of it in 2004 when we decided that should would leave work to stay home with our children. If you weren’t vested you could leave the state and they would double whatever you had contributed to the system. The state could do something like that again and allow people to remain with state government. I think it would create more of an incentive for people to leave the retirement systems and would certainly reduce the liability to those systems.


  15. - Anon - Thursday, Jan 24, 13 @ 10:15 am:

    Little confused about this SURS members already have the option to invest their funds in a “Self managed plan” SMP as new employees and have had it for sometime. It includes the employer match so why the employees would opt to not take it seems pretty crazy since they won’t receive SSI, which their employer hasn’t paid. Of course if you accept the lump sum now you wouldn’t have accrued any investment growth so no it’s not a good idea to switch mid stream, I think anyway.


  16. - Liberty_First - Thursday, Jan 24, 13 @ 10:26 am:

    SURS allows you to withdraw your contributions with something like 5% interest…. You are not credited with the state “match” until you apply for your “annuity.” Of course you never really get matching funds except your account shows you the total. When the lawsuits begin it will be interesting to see how the courts interpret use of the terms annuity and annuitant.


  17. - USMCJanitor - Thursday, Jan 24, 13 @ 10:27 am:

    ===I stand by my comment yesterday that such a move would be a poor financial decision for state employees===

    It probably is a bad move IF they keep paying benefits at the rates today. If we get to a point that they stop paying maybe not.

    If all the money I have put in my 401k and IRA were not “mine”. And I was told… “look over 30 years you have amassed 450k in retirement money, but, uh… you may only get 400 back because we spent “your” money elsewhere” I may then be thinking I want to be in control of MY money.


  18. - USMCJanitor - Thursday, Jan 24, 13 @ 10:27 am:

    With all these pensions and underfunding, etc, etc I am reminded that anything that cannot go on forever, wont.


  19. - Dirt Diver - Thursday, Jan 24, 13 @ 10:33 am:

    Liberty_First

    I think you are confused as to how SURS works. When you are talking about “SURS allows you to withdraw contributions with 5% interest”. For 1 am assuming you are talking about their SMP. You don’t get a fixed rate of 5% (for interest) you get the interest in which account actually earned. You are entitled to the employer match once you have reached 5 years regardless of whether or not annuitize. For the SURS traditional DB plan, a member can take a refund of contributions upon terminating service and would receive interest @ 4.5%.


  20. - Robert the Bruce - Thursday, Jan 24, 13 @ 10:47 am:

    Interesting concept.

    And I could see people taking the money out. Even though it means less money than they are entitled to, it is a bird in the hand.

    You are state employee near retirement age and are counting on your pension from the state, but are understandably scared of pension reform potentially cutting your pension.

    Would you rather have your $200,000 in real money to invest, or would you take your chances that you’ll actually get the full $250,000 that you are entitled to?


  21. - Liberty_First - Thursday, Jan 24, 13 @ 10:50 am:

    Dirt, Defined benefit, 4.5% - the point is anyone can get their money back…. of course in the SMP or Portable plans, you get your money.


  22. - thechampaignlife - Thursday, Jan 24, 13 @ 11:03 am:

    I’d like to be able to buy additional years worth of service credits in order to retire early. Just tell me the actuarial value and I’ll contribute my portion, the state’s portion, interest, and even a premium above that amount. Since that would be a new “benefit”, they could set the premium to whatever they want to actually help pay down the unfunded liability. It would be an early retirement program.


  23. - Quinn T. Sential - Thursday, Jan 24, 13 @ 11:05 am:

    {When the lawsuits begin it will be interesting to see how the courts interpret use of the terms annuity and annuitant.}

    Please refer to the Plan Document (contract) for definitions of key terms.


  24. - Nearly Normal - Thursday, Jan 24, 13 @ 11:35 am:

    I know a teacher who took her money out of TRS back when she was a young mother. She withdrew the first three years worth of her pension. Then after her kids were old enough she went back to work as a teacher. When she retired, she got credit for years of service BUT she did not replace what she had withdrawn. Her pension was cosiderably less than she had expected.

    She griped that TRS had “cheated” her. They did not–she cheated herself.


  25. - Dirt Diver - Thursday, Jan 24, 13 @ 11:37 am:

    Liberty,

    You only get a refund by terminating service. Under SURS, I can’t take the refund and remain in current service.


  26. - Anonymous - Thursday, Jan 24, 13 @ 12:00 pm:

    This is a terrible idea. It destabilizes pension funds and jepordizes the whole system.


  27. - RNUG - Thursday, Jan 24, 13 @ 12:02 pm:

    Just to clarify things … of the mandated retirement systems, only SURS allows the employee a choice on how to “direct” their retirement “funds/investments”.

    Participants in SERS and TRS don’t have any choice; when they are hired they get the defined benefit plan. Since the 1970 - 1972 timeframe, SERS members have to also participate in Social Security and TRS do not participate in Social Security.


  28. - Wumpus - Thursday, Jan 24, 13 @ 12:43 pm:

    Would this create a “run” on the pension funds? I know it is in the red already, but this could break the system completely, no?


  29. - Dirt Diver - Thursday, Jan 24, 13 @ 1:10 pm:

    In theory yes it could create a run. However since all the member would be rec’ing is their “employee contributions only without interest” the elimination of the liability that results from the service credit forfeit in exchange for the refund will far out weigh the money that member has received from their refund. However, if they decide to provide a generous interest rate on top of their contributions, that would be a different story. Also, I doubt very few legislators will take this deal.


  30. - Dirt Diver - Thursday, Jan 24, 13 @ 1:11 pm:

    I meant “I doubt very many legislators will take this deal”.


  31. - Fred's Mustache - Thursday, Jan 24, 13 @ 1:13 pm:

    === Would you rather have your $200,000 in real money to invest, or would you take your chances that you’ll actually get the full $250,000 that you are entitled to? ===

    What State employee has actually contributed $200,000 in “real money” into the pension system to expect only $250,000 in return. Seriously people, for those that pay into social security, you get 4% taken out of your check. For a person making 50k a year, thats $2k a year. If you work 30 years thats $60k.

    Now take that employee and give them their full pension benefits. Say their pension pays out between $20-$25k a year. (not even factoring in COLAS). Now I understand that there will be investment returns (or losses) and other factors (commissions, fees, etc.) that would affect that amount. Its a considerable difference.

    Now come up with an investment strategy in a 401(k) or IRA that can come close to such a return on your money that your pension would give you. I’m seriously curious as to how this can be done.
    Im not so sure that it can (unless you hit the jackpot on some speculative stock that makes it big).


  32. - Joe M. - Thursday, Jan 24, 13 @ 1:27 pm:

    Even if one could take out THEIR money that they have contributed, to do so would loose any contribution from the State as employer. Someone doing this would have worked their years without the State as employer contributing a single penny towards their retirement.

    McDonalds contributes more towards the retirement of their part-time high school employees (6.2% into Social Security) than the State would have contributed for someone who would withdraw their money.


  33. - cassandra - Thursday, Jan 24, 13 @ 2:15 pm:

    I’m with Fred’s M. Don’t do it. If you are strongly tempted, read a good book about the stock market first. I recommend the one by the guy who ran the Yale endowment, may still run it. Can’t remember the name, but it’s good.

    Perhaps this bill, if implemented, would give us one tool to measure the financial sophistication of our esteemed legislators though.


  34. - RNUG - Thursday, Jan 24, 13 @ 2:33 pm:

    To repeat what I wrote yesterday:

    “… And if you quit and withdraw from the system, all you get back is your original contributions … no interest, no match, none of the money the state was supposed to have been putting away for you. And unless you properly roll the money to an regular IRA, you’ll be paying both taxes and early withdrawal penalities. Definitely not a good financial choice if you have very many years in.”


  35. - SIUPROF - Thursday, Jan 24, 13 @ 2:39 pm:

    The legislature needs to be careful. By forcing new or existing people out of the defined benefit program (tier II or scaring people into accepting an offer of taking out their contributions or converting their contributions into a self managed plan, they just might dry up employee contributions into the defined benefit plan. If that happens, cash flow will suffer. An underfunded plan can continue to operate as long as their is enough cash coming in to pay benefits (kind of like a ponzi scheme). They need to accept the reality that the state has borrowed money from the pension systems and it is time to pay up. Adopting a version of Ralph Marti’s flat payment reorganization plan (perhaps at a bit lower amount over a few more years) makes the most sense. And extend the sales tax to services to help service the debt.


  36. - SIUPROF - Thursday, Jan 24, 13 @ 2:40 pm:

    there-hate spellcheck


  37. - NoNameNick - Thursday, Jan 24, 13 @ 2:45 pm:

    Seriously? Who has contributed $200,000 to their retirement system. I’ve been at it for 20 yerars and only had about $36,000 taken out of my pay. This exageration of the amopunts is what drives most of the rank and file crazy about these pension discussions. Like we have these huge pensions lined up. If I retired today my pension would be $1800/month. Any takers for the lifstyle that will afford?


  38. - Robert the Bruce - Thursday, Jan 24, 13 @ 2:52 pm:

    ==And if you quit and withdraw from the system, all you get back is your original contributions … no interest, no match, none of the money the state was supposed to have been putting away for you.==
    I still think that this is an interesting concept - allowing early withdrawals. But it truly seems to be a terrible offer. If it was instead something like 75% of the present value of your earned pension (including what the state’s contribution should have been), then employees would have an interesting choice to make - 75% of a guaranteed pension or the chance that their pension will be fully funded, not reduced, not tampered with in any way. If enough said yes, it’d ultimately reduce the state’s pension obligation, but if too many said yes, the state wouldn’t have the money to pay.


  39. - reformer - Thursday, Jan 24, 13 @ 4:37 pm:

    Do legislators who abstain from GARS have to pay Social Security with the employer match? If so, would legislators who withdraw from GARS have to start paying Social Security?


  40. - RNUG - Thursday, Jan 24, 13 @ 5:49 pm:

    reformer @ 4:37ppm,

    It depends.

    From the 2012 GARS Handbook, page 4:

    ELIGIBILITY

    You automatically become a member of
    GARS unless you file an election with the
    Board of Trustees not to participate. Your
    written decision declining participation must
    be filed within 24 months from becoming a
    member.

    If you choose not to participate in GARS,
    you are subject to mandatory social security
    coverage unless contributing a minimum of
    7.5% of your legislative salary to a qualified
    Deferred Compensation Plan.


  41. - RNUG - Thursday, Jan 24, 13 @ 5:52 pm:

    Should have added to the previous post …

    If that Deferred Comp is a 457 plan, once you leave government employment you can pull the money out of a 457 regardless of age and just pay straight income tax on it.


  42. - Flan - Thursday, Jan 24, 13 @ 6:31 pm:

    I cannot imagine anyone would take their money out of SERS. I think we estimated once that a person with 30 years of funding in there would burn through their own contributions in about 6 years of retirement; after that you’re on the money the GA puts into the retirement system. That’s crazy talk.


  43. - rat - Thursday, Jan 24, 13 @ 6:43 pm:

    Some math to think about

    Assumptions
    45 years old/$85,000 per year/16 years for the state.

    $45,000. Estimated pension with interest

    Retire at age 65 (20 more years)

    $45,000 (Base Amount)

    8% Interest (What the pension system calculates as rate of return)

    $5,100-Annual deposit (6% of salary invested per year) Employees pay 4% State wants 2% more

    You would have $473,708 with your name on it. If you also saved 6% of your own money, you would have $725,711 with your name on it.

    What if you started at 30 years old?

    The state wants to start paying pension when you are 65 and not give cost of living increases. I could live on $725,000 with deferred compensation. Also, this would be a choice therefore constitutional. The state would get rid of future pension liabilities and we could actually plan for our future. Sweet!!!!


  44. - WazUp - Thursday, Jan 24, 13 @ 7:32 pm:

    ==Tim bivins soon to be the recipient of two pensions. Yes folks 2 pensions.==

    He can’t be that dumb to introduce a bill like that and then not opt out can he?


Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.


* Reader comments closed for the weekend
* Mendoza transition team responds to the Sun-Times' Madigan conspiracy theory
* *** UPDATED x1 - Durkin responds *** Back to the future: Madigan demands "memorandums of understanding"
* Question of the day
* Shimkus loses out on plum post
* *** UPDATED x1 *** Moody's says Rauner veto is just one of many problems facing CPS
* *** UPDATED x4 - Mendoza responds - Munger calls suit "cowardly" *** Lawsuit filed over legislator pay
* The "green energy" side of the Exelon bill
* Caption contest!
* How is this "breaking our agreement"?
* Positioning, practicalities and politics weigh heavily against a House override
* Report: A decade to reach solvency, if leaders cooperate on tough plan
* *** UPDATED x2 *** Rauner goes into the lion's den
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today's edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)
* Yesterday's blog posts

Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............
<


Search This Blog...

Search the 98th General Assembly By Bill Number
(example: HB0001)

Search the 98th General Assembly By Keyword

  
* Google is opening up Santa’s Village until December 24th
* Apple VP of Special Projects Paul Deneve Removed From Leadership Webpage [Update: Still at Apple]
* Lenovo Phab 2 Pro Video Review: More than just Tango?
* You can now play Oprah Winfrey’s mobile game on your Android device
* Copy and paste trick could unlock iOS 10 devices in Lost Mode
* Apple Store App for iOS Updated With Rich Notifications, One-Tap Apple Watch Purchases
* Fitbit Blaze review

* White Sox plans could clear up at Meetings
* Lawrie, Garcia settle with White Sox for 2017
* Garcia, Lawrie settle with White Sox for 2017
* Peace & glove: Owners, players reach CBA deal
* White Sox plans could clear up at Meetings
* Garcia among White Sox non-tender options
* White Sox plans could clear up at Meetings

...............


Main Menu
Home
Illinois
YouTube
Pundit rankings
Obama
Subscriber Content
Durbin
Burris
Blagojevich Trial
Advertising
Updated Posts
Polls

Archives
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005

Syndication

RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0
WordPress

Loading


* Governor Calls Out Madigan - Alton Daily News..
* Illinois lawmakers vote to spare 2 nuclear plan.....
* Illinois lawmakers vote to spare 2 nuclear plan.....
* Illinois lawmakers vote to spare 2 nuclear plan.....
* Illinois lawmakers vote to spare 2 nuclear plan.....
* Chicago Public Schools unveils more capital spe.....


* EXCHANGE: Rockford firefighters help veteran battling cancer
* EXCHANGE: For student veterans, tattoos tell quite a story
* Illinois sees warmest fall on record since 1931
* Police advise against unsupervised searches of missing boy
* Chicago-area judge who let clerk take bench has Alzheimer's
* Champaign man gets 45 years in 2012 bystander shooting
* United to pay $2.4M to settle with SEC over NJ to SC flight
* Illinois lawmakers sue to get paid despite state budget mess
* Warrant charges Rockford teen with shooting another teen
* Chicago establishes legal fund for those facing deportation

* Lawmakers sue comptroller for not paying them
* Electronic road signs are dark near Effingham due to budget
* State lawmakers vote to spare 2 nuclear plants
* Legislature OKs Exelon subsidy plan, goes to Rauner
* Rauner: No more stopgap budgets without property tax freeze, term limits
* Illinois shutters nation's last prison roundhouse
* Clinton nuclear plant has history of cost, job uncertainty
* AFSCME files lawsuit over labor contract
* Rauner to Dems: No budget without term limits, property tax freeze
* AFSCME files suit over labor contract

* Why Planned Parenthood donors are thanking Mike Pence
* Behind Rauner's sudden war with state's other top Dem
* McDonald's in China is a tall order
* John Wilson, founder of art expo that began Navy Pier's revival, dies at 82
* The backstory behind that CPS veto


* 3 shot in Near North Side
* Ryan Ciminelli will set the men’s targets: Beat the Champions
* Man shot in Archer Heights
* Man, 25, shot in Brighton Park
* Boy, 14, charged with attempted robbery, battery in Batavia
* 2 wounded in East Garfield Park shooting
* Man shot to death in East Chicago
* Man, 19, shot on Far South Side
* 4 wounded in weekend shootings across Chicago
* MAP: Chicago weekend shootings tracker for Dec. 2 – 5


* 1 dead, 13 wounded in shootings city shootings
* Inmate held on 1974 parole violation even though officials want him freed
* Rauner, Madigan huddle this weekend in search of elusive deal, big or small
* Professor fatally stabbed on University of Southern California campus, student arrested
* Trump takes on another Indiana manufacturer he says is moving to Mexico
* Marine drove wrong way in I-88 crash that killed him, 2 others, police say
* Deaths in cancer trials remain mystery for promising therapy
* Shredding Iran nuclear deal could prove harder than Trump thinks
* TV news executives are not seeing a bidding war for Fox News star Megyn Kelly
* China hopes Trump call with Taiwan's president won't lead to 'damaged' ties


The widget AQL4JYGHIY powered by Feed Informer does not exist.


* Guest Column: Where is the bailout for human services?
* Charles Krauthammer: After a mere 25 years, the triumph of the West is over
* Lawmakers sue comptroller for not paying them
* Electronic road signs are dark near Effingham due to budget
* State lawmakers vote to spare 2 nuclear plants
* Legislature OKs Exelon subsidy plan, goes to Rauner
* Our View: This Week’s Thumbs up/Thumbs Down
* Rauner: No more stopgap budgets without property tax freeze, term limits
* Illinois shutters nation's last prison roundhouse
* Clinton nuclear plant has history of cost, job uncertainty


* Area Calendar 12/3/16
* Enter our big buck contest
* Clinton celebrates good news in Exelon bill
* First measurable snow on its way to Q-C
* Top of the morning, Dec. 3, 2016
* Ice skating rink opens in downtown Carbondale
* Kone tree rewelded, put back atop building
* Marion High School fine arts wing expected to open in the spring
* Good Samaritan Ministries in a better place than last year this time
* County ethics panel rules for state's attorney


* Professor fatally stabbed on USC campus, student arrested
* Johnson, Stewart, Earnhardt honored as NASCAR closes 2016
* Aurora Christian downs Harvest Christian
* Bulls enjoy playing at Cavs' fast pace
* Butler, Wade lead Bulls to 111-105 win over Cavaliers

* House lawmakers overcome hurdle on key tra...
* Rodney Davis talks funding with Bloomingto...
* The agency that fought Illiana gets a new ...
* Rep. Dold takes educational cruise down Ch...
* Lawmakers decry high turnover rate of VA h...
* CBD Oil, and politics
* Simon considering state Senate bid
* Killer Congressman Tom MacArthur trying to...
* Shutdown? State may not notice
* Rep. Bob Dold

* Sen. Dick Durbin Unveils Protection Effort......

* SEIU leaders say planned Monday strike by ......

* Will Rauner be eaten by Chicago “bear” now sleeping in Illinois “woods?”
* Morning Minute: U.S. economy showed strong growth in last quarter; consumer confidence climbs
* REALTOR® Jim Kinney named to state’s Bicentennial Commission
* EXTRA: Madigan spouse, Burke, Sox & Cubs chairs (but no Bears) on state Bicentennial celebration commission
* ILGOP Launches new website, "BossMadigan.com"
* Illinois Dems sue Comptroller for overdue paychecks
* AFP-IL Exec Director says "End the Subsidies, Say No to the Bailout Bill"
* East St Louis Township Supervisor pleads guilty to wire fraud, embezzling public funds
* Serving on Mahomet Village Board worth sacrifice for Cook
* JIB files complaint against Judge Valarie E. Turner


* Thanksgiving Holiday Travel Brings Lowest Fatality Rate In Six Years
* Governor Announces Appointments to Illinois Bicentennial Commission
* Stateville Correctional Center’s F House Officially Closed
* Governor Takes Bill Action
* IEMA Highlights Safety during the Holidays - Encourages holiday shoppers to give preparedness gifts this year




      Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller