SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      Mobile Version     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact
CapitolFax.com
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
Projecting the future

Wednesday, Mar 27, 2013

* From New York Times polling analyst Nate Silver

In the past, we have sometimes considered the possibility that support for same-sex marriage is increasing at a faster rate than before. The data seems to suggest, however, that the increase in support has been reasonably steady since about 2004.

The national polling graph…

* And using a model based on polling and demographic analysis, Silver projects the future

I assume that support for same-sex marriage will continue to increase by one and a half percentage points nationally per year, which reflects the recent historical trend from both polling and ballot-initiative data. (The way that the model is designed, support might be projected to increase slightly faster or slower than that in individual states based on the number of swing voters.) Thus, we can extrapolate the results forward from 2008 to 2012, and to future years like 2016 and 2020.

* Some of his projected support results for same sex marriage in ballot initiatives. Note Illinois…

Illinois doesn’t have binding ballot initiatives, of course, but you get the idea.

* Meanwhile, the Sun-Times looks at the prospects for the gay marriage bill

While Illinois Speaker Michael Madigan said the legislation is 12 votes shy, quiet momentum continues to build among Illinois lawmakers – including Republicans – who believe now is the time to embrace the issue.

“The margin is smaller than what the Speaker had stated,” said one state legislative source who asked not to be named.

Several sources said a small group of Illinois Republicans are considering voting in favor of the bill, which would almost certainly give it the 60 votes needed to advance. “There’s some indication that there’s more than one Republican supporting this bill,” said one of the sources.

As I told you yesterday, Madigan overstated the margin. Right now, there’s only one Republican openly supporting the bill, Rep. Ron Sandack. There may be another out there, but so far, not much more than that.

* But GOP Chairman Pat Brady is standing firm

“Whether you agree or disagree with particular Republican beliefs … we have to be gracious in a diversity of opinions,” Brady said. “I think that’s the way we can get more people to support our candidates.”

If Silver’s projections are even close to accurate, then Brady has made the right decision: Get on the bus before it runs you over.

But Brady is also giving the GOP cover in case the Republican House vote for gay marriage is as low as it was in the Senate, which is also pretty smart.

- Posted by Rich Miller        


57 Comments
  1. - Oswego Willy - Wednesday, Mar 27, 13 @ 9:57 am:

    ===But Brady is also giving the GOP cover in case the Republican House vote for gay marriage is as low as it was in the Senate, which is also pretty smart.===

    Spot on! Well said.

    This “vote total” has been my fear that there will be NO cover, at this point, if there are 63 out of 66 GA GOP members voting “no” to SSM, AND add the fact Senator Oberweis is/was pushing the agenda of Brady being gone for taking a supporting position on SSM.

    What cover does the ILGOP have?

    None.

    Oberweis can try to spin, sell, backtrack, whatever, on what he said was the reason, but, Senator, you had from Novermber to January to make it about the dismal election results, not working with the SCC, fundraising, but you chose to be very public about making it about SSM, no matter how hard you try to un-ring that bell.

    Pat Brady is giving “cover” to the 63 GOP members, and the SCC are going to “Dump Brady” at the call of SSM. The trend and tide is going against My Party, as they fight it, with 63 “No”s and dumping the Party Chair, (A useless job, title, etc.,).

    These decisions on SSM, and Brady’s dumping and its timing and cause, will haunt my party as they go fishing in “swing” districts held by Dems already.

    Spot on, Rich, I hope someone is listening.


  2. - just sayin' - Wednesday, Mar 27, 13 @ 10:39 am:

    Pat Brady was already a failed chair, now he’s further divided the party.

    Last year’s wipe-out of the GOP in Illinois had nothing to do with the fact the IL GOP platform has the same position on marriage that Barack Obama had until May of last year. Zero. Nada.

    Some people are so gullible.


  3. - RonOglesby - Wednesday, Mar 27, 13 @ 10:51 am:

    It will happen in Illinois. This is a crazy issue in every state pretty much.

    One thing I will say, the poster boy for this (California, with its Prop 8 at SCOTUS) this was just as bad there. Only here we talk about the GOP. In Cali it wasnt the GOP holding this up as much as you may think. Lots of votes for prop 8 came from black and hispanic districts. they voted for Obama and are solid D’s. But their religion guides them on this issue more than party affiliation.

    We dont do constitutional referendums here in Illinois like Cali, but while politicians seem split by party (for the most part) I think with the actual people its not a political split that is simple to point at.


  4. - Demoralized - Wednesday, Mar 27, 13 @ 10:52 am:

    @just sayin’

    Maybe you should tell that to the Jim Oberweis’ of the world who, after all, made it THE central issue in the Pat Brady saga. Gullible indeed.


  5. - Grandson of Man - Wednesday, Mar 27, 13 @ 10:53 am:

    ==If Silver’s projections are even close to accurate==

    Mr. Silver’s poll analysis in the 2012 presidential election was spot-on. He was slammed and insulted by critics on the right. His critics were denying polls and saying they were skewed.

    Folks on the right ought to really take heed to these polls and stop denying them. It’s important, in my opinion, for Republicans to begin taking the lead on these issues, or they might get left behind permanently. They have a reason to dare: for the first time, more than 50% of young Republicans support marriage equality.


  6. - In 630 - Wednesday, Mar 27, 13 @ 10:58 am:

    Adding to the dogpile on Just Sayin: this year’s ILGOP failures may have had nothing to do with their position on same sex marriage, but the next decade of failure could easily be related to it.


  7. - RonOglesby - Wednesday, Mar 27, 13 @ 11:00 am:

    Lots of focus is put on this. I understand the reasons. But funny all the effort put into this and I do sometimes wonder if it is not cover for not doing crap about our fiscal situation in this state.


  8. - Oswego Willy - Wednesday, Mar 27, 13 @ 11:01 am:

    ===but the next decade of failure could easily be related to it.===

    Agreed. That is the lack of forsight of this “Social Agenda Litmus Test GOP” and it is going to force more people out, than bring anyone in.


  9. - just sayin' - Wednesday, Mar 27, 13 @ 11:11 am:

    “Maybe you should tell that to the Jim Oberweis’ of the world who, after all, made it THE central issue in the Pat Brady saga.”

    Red herring. Hardly my fault Jim Oberweis and Pat Brady are both goofs.

    I’m not disputing the country is moving fast on this issue and 10 yrs from now (if not sooner) gay marriage will surely be legal nationwide one way or another. But as we saw yesterday at SCOTUS, it’s still not the slam dunk some would like to believe.

    Also I would note Mark Kirk was on record as PRO-traditional marriage when he beat Alexi G. in 2010 who was on record FOR gay marriage. Granted Mark Kirk didn’t campaign on the issue and everyone knows where he likely really stands. Also, yes, opinion has shifted more in just 3 yrs. But again point is he was officially on record as against gay marriage, and he won. You can’t say this is such a big controlling issue and then ignore all the evidence where it clearly wasn’t.


  10. - Joe from Joliet - Wednesday, Mar 27, 13 @ 11:16 am:

    “Social Agenda Litmus Test GOP”

    The SALT GOP. Good one, Willy.

    It’s hard to grow things when you add SALT.


  11. - wordslinger - Wednesday, Mar 27, 13 @ 11:33 am:

    –I do sometimes wonder if it is not cover for not doing crap about our fiscal situation in this state.–

    What does that even mean? You could say the same about guns.

    Walking and chewing gum at the same time ain’t as hard as it looks.


  12. - grand old partisan - Wednesday, Mar 27, 13 @ 11:35 am:

    I think it’s time for “social conservatives” to try and find some honor in defeat on this issue. As painful – excruciatingly painful – as it is for me to admit, Justice Kagan’s questions yesterday were devastatingly poignant. She absolutely destroyed the ‘state interest’ rationale. After all, what difference is there between a homosexual couple and a heterosexual couple who is either incapable or unwilling to reproduce (and subsequently become parents)? What justification is there for accepting one marriage and not the other?

    The toothpaste is already out of the tube, so to speak. Gay couples are already standing in front of their family & friends and pledging to each other (and, perhaps, whatever God they may believe in) that they will commit their lives to each other. From a non-sectarian standpoint, isn’t that fundamentally what marriage is about? After all, if the government came by tomorrow and told my wife and I that they no longer recognized our marriage, it wouldn’t change a thing for me in terms of my commitment to her and our relationship. So maybe we should either get government out of the marriage business altogether, or just accept that the gender of the participants is really no one else’s business.

    Besides, it’s always possible that if more gay couples are allowed to marry and adopt children, there will be greater demand for adoptable children. And I know how we can make millions more available every year…..


  13. - LincolnLounger - Wednesday, Mar 27, 13 @ 11:37 am:

    Why the GOP leadership doesn’t get together, find a handful of safe votes to put on this bill, and get it off the table and over with is beyond me?

    The zealots, most of whom have proven they can’t organize a three-car parade, will all be distracted next year with gubernatorial and other races.

    Bill Brady was nearly ideal (except for immigration) for them — completely restrictive on abortion and ready to play Whack-a-Mole with any gay who dared show his face. While they were filling prospective cabinet appointments and designating plum jobs and commissions, Terry Cosgrove and Personal PAC, along with their Democrat allies, completely out-worked, out-organized, and out-classed them — propping up a flawed candidate in an historic GOP wave election.

    Exactly who is “gullible” again?


  14. - Meanderthal - Wednesday, Mar 27, 13 @ 11:42 am:

    Who are the 12 Democratic House holdouts? Why not just have President Obama or Mrs. Obama call them all directly.


  15. - Rich Miller - Wednesday, Mar 27, 13 @ 11:44 am:

    Meanderthal, if it was that easy it would’ve been done.


  16. - Wensicia - Wednesday, Mar 27, 13 @ 11:46 am:

    Seems to me Pat Brady is trying to make the Republican Party in Illinois viable by shrugging off previous intolerant views. Hoped for result, more voters. How is he wrong?


  17. - Oswego Willy - Wednesday, Mar 27, 13 @ 11:47 am:

    ===Why the GOP leadership doesn’t get together, find a handful of safe votes to put on this bill, and get it off the table and over with is beyond me?===

    I think here is “the rub”.

    The 19 and 47 seats in the Senate and House, accordingly, are as close to “non-competetive” for a Dem as possible, but most are ripe for a Conservative Primary opponent if they lean towards the middle and not the Right.

    The margin of “diverse” districts is probably quite small, so the GOP members need to show wether they are strong enough to vote on the issue, or weak enough to vote the Right way.

    Look who is left who voted for Civil Unions in the House and the Senate on the GOP side.

    ….

    Exactly.

    Your post was On Point. Well said, LincolnLounger


  18. - wishbone - Wednesday, Mar 27, 13 @ 11:48 am:

    “…including Republicans – who believe now is the time to embrace the issue.”

    I thought it was interesting that Hillary took so long to come on board. She just beat the SCOTUS decision(s) whatever they may be.


  19. - Ahoy! - Wednesday, Mar 27, 13 @ 11:49 am:

    I think the opposition to gay marriage will continue to decrease faster than support. Notice since 1996 those who oppose have went from 70 to 40 (roughly) which represents a 30 point drop. Support went from 30 to 50 roughly an increase of a little more than 20 points.

    Frankly as more friends and family come out, I believe opposition will decrease even faster, while support lags in growth just a little. It’s amazing what happens when a family member comes out, hearts change fast.

    Either way, this train is going to keep moving toward acceptance and tolerance and the Republicans need move toward accepting equality. Why the Republicans would want to be on the wrong side of history is beyond me.


  20. - RMD - Wednesday, Mar 27, 13 @ 11:52 am:

    Will approval of same-sex marriage open the flood gates to many unintended consequences? Loss of income tax exemption to religious organization who refuse to marry same sex couples; allow for multiple partner marriages and the impact it could have on employee sponsored health insurance plans, increased dependent reductions on tax forms, and social security benefits for non-working spouses. This is an important step as it could rework the definition of the nuclear family which is the foundation on which the american society thrives. This is to important a decision to make until the onion is peeled to its core.


  21. - wordslinger - Wednesday, Mar 27, 13 @ 12:02 pm:

    –Will approval of same-sex marriage open the flood gates to many unintended consequences?==

    Dogs and cat sleeping together?

    Seriously, how hard it is to mind your own business and live and let live? No heavy lifting required.


  22. - Anonymous - Wednesday, Mar 27, 13 @ 12:06 pm:

    Be careful what you wish for.

    Eighty years ago, popular political opinion (something that “the marriage equality” crowd keeps trumpeting now) seemed to be decisively breaking in favor of the prohibition of alcohol. The movement was so strong that the proponents succeeded in amending the Constitution through the legislative process rather than resorting to shopping a test case to the judiciary. Illinois had numerous powerful figures and activist organizations backing prohibition.

    Within less than a single generation, the noble experiment proved to be an epic societal disaster. The promise utopia never came to pass. Despite the political power of the WCTU and the ASL, the rank and file people who were not polled opposed the change.

    Redefining marriage and issuing licenses is not going to prove to be a magical elixir.


  23. - wordslinger - Wednesday, Mar 27, 13 @ 12:12 pm:

    Anon, thank you.

    Until now, I’d never even considered the clear relationship between gay marriage and Prohibition, lol.


  24. - LincolnLounger - Wednesday, Mar 27, 13 @ 12:12 pm:

    You are seriously comparing equality to prohibition?

    Just wow.


  25. - LincolnLounger - Wednesday, Mar 27, 13 @ 12:17 pm:

    Can anybody explain to me why the forces for marriage equality aren’t enlisting Terry Cosgrove in the battle? There’s no one more effective. Imagine the terror on the reluctant Democrats if he got involved (or someone competent used the same tactics as he does at Personal PAC.)


  26. - Rich Miller - Wednesday, Mar 27, 13 @ 12:18 pm:

    ===not going to prove to be a magical elixir. ===

    You’re trying to address a result that has never been propagated. Try thinking things through a bit more, please. The only thing being asked for here is that two consenting adults who love each other want to be married.


  27. - Simon Sez - Wednesday, Mar 27, 13 @ 12:20 pm:

    @Grandson -

    While I would buy Silver’s projections of how states would have voted in 2008 (and even in 2012, noting only slight error), it seems to me to be a massive assumption that support for same-sex marriage will continue to grow at the same rate.

    If memory serves, Silver had Romney winning Florida the week before the election. What happened? New data came in, and the prediction was adjusted. Forgive me for being skeptical that anyone, regardless of their sophistication, could accurately predict support for an issue 7 years into the future.


  28. - The Muse - Wednesday, Mar 27, 13 @ 12:30 pm:

    @Anonymous- I’m with Lincoln Lounger on this one.

    It is an incredibly brazen assertion you made regarding prohibition and marriage equality given that prohibition was a failure in attempting to control human behavior as regulating people’s right to marry will be a failure in the near future as well. The irony: Both were/are fueled by Bible-thumpers who preach(ed) their own religious truths over another tax paying citizen’s.


  29. - Grandson of Man - Wednesday, Mar 27, 13 @ 12:33 pm:

    >>Forgive me for being skeptical that anyone, regardless of their sophistication, could accurately predict support for an issue 7 years into the future.


  30. - RonOglesby - Wednesday, Mar 27, 13 @ 12:39 pm:

    @word,

    The gun issue is a must deal with situation in this state. And yes a wedge issue. Same Sex marriage is not being forced on the ILGA, they have no time sensistive requirement to deal with it.

    I think these pols should focus on why our state is falling apart and other priorities. This gets lots of air time and print space as Illinois burns.

    With all that said I could care less if we pass it. If gay men and women want to be married, sure. I dont really care and think I know better than they do what is best for them. I do care it gets lots of time while we are broke.


  31. - qcexaminer - Wednesday, Mar 27, 13 @ 12:42 pm:

    I don’t think it is particularly astounding that a deep blue state like Illinois is “trending” toward ssm, what I find astounding is that a moderate, swing state like Iowa has had ssm for years, while ssm languishes in Madigan’s Dem controlled House.

    Weird, huh?


  32. - Oswego Willy - Wednesday, Mar 27, 13 @ 12:45 pm:

    I’ll have what …- Anonymous - is drinking(?)

    - RMD -,

    Sounds like more big government. So NOT having SSM is a Small Government issue with taxes, regulation, and insurance issues?


  33. - Chavez-respecting Obamist - Wednesday, Mar 27, 13 @ 12:51 pm:

    = nuclear family which is the foundation on which the american society thrives =

    Thirty percent of us live alone.

    And besides that, how is a man and a man and their kids *not* a nuclear family?


  34. - RonOglesby - Wednesday, Mar 27, 13 @ 12:52 pm:

    This line:

    I dont really care and think I know better than they do what is best for them. I do care it gets lots of time while we are broke.

    Should have read “I dont really think I know better”. after a re-read it seems the opposite.


  35. - hisgirlfriday - Wednesday, Mar 27, 13 @ 12:59 pm:

    In the last 24 hours we’ve had Dems from Alaska, Montana, Missouri, and North Carolina come out for gay marriage. If Dems from the city and burbs are too chicken and/or bigoted to vote for ssm then Madigan needs to give these mushrooms some spine implants or pull back the curtains and let us Illinois voters work on them to let them know just how disconnected from their constituents they are.


  36. - Grandson of Man - Wednesday, Mar 27, 13 @ 1:00 pm:

    Oops, I don’t know what happened in my last post, but I’ll try again.

    @Simon Sez,

    Yes, we can’t predict what will happen in seven years, but polling trend lines show that support for gay marriage is growing steadily. It’s a safe bet that support will be greater in the future. Young people overwhelmingly support gay marriage, but even if they become more conservative as they get older, there is no reason to believe that this would dramatically change the overall trends.


  37. - Esquire - Wednesday, Mar 27, 13 @ 1:11 pm:

    @qcexaminer:

    In Iowa, same sex marriage was legalized a due to a court decision (the Iowa State Supreme Court issued the decision). In Illinois, the matter is being addressed legislatively. This process takes much more time.

    By the way, at the next Iowa statewide judicial election, three of the supreme court judges who voted in favor of same sex marriage were on the retention ballot. All three were removed from office by Iowa voters. This was unprecedented in Iowa elections.


  38. - Oswego Willy - Wednesday, Mar 27, 13 @ 1:19 pm:

    ===let us Illinois voters work on them to let them know just how disconnected from their constituents they are.===

    In March of 2014, and November of 2014, you will have your chance if it doesn’t pass.

    It’s up to the Dems if they want to run a Primary Challenge, and if you find a Republican that will RUN on SSM in 2014, as a challenger to a sitting Dem who voted “No”, let me know about that race, I want to follow that one closely.


  39. - ZC - Wednesday, Mar 27, 13 @ 1:30 pm:

    There’s some evidence I think that younger voters become more fiscally conservative as they age - though even there, that’s predicated on the idea that they make more money as they age, which isn’t currently as true as it used to be.

    But don’t expect that trendline to apply to a social controversy like gay marriage. I think it’s much more likely that the whole definition of “social conservative” is going to change. It has in the past - I’ll avoid mentioning the inflammatory parallels - and my suspicion is in the long run it will here again.


  40. - Quiet Sage - Wednesday, Mar 27, 13 @ 1:36 pm:

    The increase in support for gay marriage during the past few years is an astoundingly quick reversal of public opinion on an issue touching the foundations of people’s core beliefs. Are there any parallels for this in history? Ten years ago, gay marriage in Illinois was viewed by most as inconceivable, today it is seen as almost inevitable. Our society is changing very, very quickly and on a very deep level.


  41. - wishbone - Wednesday, Mar 27, 13 @ 1:37 pm:

    “Seriously, how hard it is to mind your own business and live and let live? No heavy lifting required.”
    “Until now, I’d never even considered the clear relationship between gay marriage and Prohibition, lol.”
    “Walking and chewing gum at the same time ain’t as hard as it looks.”

    Wordslinger is on a roll taking on stupidity.


  42. - MrJM - Wednesday, Mar 27, 13 @ 1:43 pm:

    Forgive me for being skeptical that anyone, regardless of their sophistication, could accurately predict support for an issue 7 years into the future.

    In 2020, beer, chocolate and ice cream will be wildly popular with Americans.

    Take it to the bank.

    – MrJM


  43. - Yellow Dog Democrat - Wednesday, Mar 27, 13 @ 1:45 pm:

    You can quibble with Silver’s model (all models are wrong) but not the end conclusion (some models are useful).

    The growth in public support for equal rights wont be linear exactly, but is likely to be logrithmic over time. eventually, it will hit a ceiling. 75 percent, 80 percent? who knows.

    politically, you will notice lots of western states, midwest states, and eastern states above the national trend. but southern states that represent the GOP’s national base in Congress and presidential politics? they are locked into the past.

    Don’t look for the GOP to drop their opposition to equal rights any time soon, or lawmakers from southern Illinois (which is further south than Lexington, KY) either.

    As long as the majority of primary voters in solidly Republican congressional districts cling to the past, so will the GOP.


  44. - Yellow Dog Democrat - Wednesday, Mar 27, 13 @ 1:54 pm:

    @wordslinger:

    I think you pretty much have to forfeit the “marriage is for procreation” argument as soon as you realize that Illinois law specifically allows cousins to marry provided that they are beyond the age of childbearing.


  45. - ArchPundit - Wednesday, Mar 27, 13 @ 2:04 pm:

    ===Loss of income tax exemption to religious organization who refuse to marry same sex couples;

    You do realize churches aren’t forced to marry anyone now, don’t you? A church can refuse to marry an interracial couple. A state cannot refuse a marriage license to such a couple, however.

    In the same way, a church will not be forced to marry same sex couples, but the state will not be allowed to deny them a marriage license. There is freedom of religion, but also equal treatment under the law.


  46. - Fultonfarm - Wednesday, Mar 27, 13 @ 2:08 pm:

    Of course, if gay marraige is allowed then such state employee dependents will be allowed to get health coverage.

    This will be mean that at least state workers will end up paying more than gay couples as everything increasingly becomes redistributiion/means tested.

    Naturaly the state will want more money from everybody thus increasingly cost shifting higher premiums to non-gay employees with families.

    Funny, how this is never analyzed or mentioned.

    One solution would be for health insurance to be no longer provided to dependents of state workers/retirees.


  47. - hisgirlfriday - Wednesday, Mar 27, 13 @ 2:13 pm:

    Quiet sage: its really not that radical of a change when you think of how opposite sex marriage has changed over millenia. No longer do women have to put up with polygamy or provide a dowry or forfeit all individual economic contractual and property rights yet all those things are hallmarks of marriage in the bible thumped so hard by traditional marriage supporters as an excuse to exclude gay couples from marriage. Thank God marriage has changed.


  48. - Not in the Know - Wednesday, Mar 27, 13 @ 2:28 pm:

    Rep. Ron Sandack…the same guy who was one of the first to turn down the legislative pension/health care. Who attempted to eliminate the legislative pension going forward, term limits to eliminate career politicians, supported thedream act, ect. Hey…not too bad for a Republican.


  49. - MrJM - Wednesday, Mar 27, 13 @ 2:32 pm:

    Loss of income tax exemption to religious organization who refuse to marry same sex couples

    Are you being paranoid or just silly?

    The state can’t even compel religious organizations to comply with fundamental anti-discrimination laws, e.g. the Catholic Church refuses to hire ANY women as priests.

    – MrJM


  50. - TwoFeetThick - Wednesday, Mar 27, 13 @ 2:42 pm:

    @Fultonfarm

    What the heck are you talking about? You must be growing some wicked weed, dude. You’re not making any sense.


  51. - peacelover - Wednesday, Mar 27, 13 @ 2:46 pm:

    Fultonfarm: What?! State employee same sex couples are already eligible to pay the same premiums straight couples do for dependent coverage. How do you figure non-gay families will have to pay more money?


  52. - Atbat - Wednesday, Mar 27, 13 @ 3:03 pm:

    Since we are from Illinois (and we all saw Lincoln, the Movie) - call in James Spader to seek out the needed holdouts; the rest will be history.


  53. - Anonymous - Wednesday, Mar 27, 13 @ 5:04 pm:

    So here’s my takeaway and only comment on this thread:

    1) Some people expect all Democrats who have been elected into office to do everything that the President and Mrs. Obama ask of them;

    2) It is not considered appropriate to ask questions regarding the impact passage of SSM might have on “infrastructure” because asking such questions obviously means you’re against SSM, rather than trying to obtain info to help state a case in support of SSM–or SSM supporters themselves believe that the response is not a “good” one and have no confidence in their ability to build consensus regardless of what the answers are; and

    3) Some elected officials are not the independent and thoughtful statesmen many believed they were; they’re (as John Lovitz always said) simply…acting!

    I’m beginning to believe that the biggest issue SSM marriage has against it in many crowds, are the arguments and tactics that some supporters make for it.


  54. - Nick Kruse - Wednesday, Mar 27, 13 @ 5:20 pm:

    ===Since we are from Illinois (and we all saw Lincoln, the Movie) - call in James Spader to seek out the needed holdouts; the rest will be history.===

    As long as we are on the topic of the Lincoln movie, here are some good quotes from it that apply to same-sex marriage:

    Anti-equality: “We shall oppose this amendment, and any legislation that so affronts natural law, insulting to God as to man! Congress must never declare equal those whom God created unequal!” - Fernando Wood

    Pro-equality: “I don’t hold with equality in all things, only with equality before the law and nothing more.” - Thaddeus Stevens

    For the folks who complain about moving on marriage equality only two years after civil unions: “Say you believe in legal equality for all races, not racial equality. Compromise, or you risk it all.” - Rep James Ashley to Thaddeus Stevens

    For the folks who complain about Obama not defending DOMA: “He didn’t say it was legal. Only that it wasn’t criminal.” Lincoln says of his Attorney General’s advice on the Emancipation Proclamation


  55. - Small Town Liberal - Wednesday, Mar 27, 13 @ 6:54 pm:

    - impact passage of SSM might have on “infrastructure” -

    You show me a reasonable question about that and I promise I’ll try to give a reasonable answer. I’ve yet to hear one.


  56. - Yellow Dog Democrat - Thursday, Mar 28, 13 @ 8:15 am:

    @Anonymous -

    You and Fultonfarm make an argument against the state providing ANY medical benefits to the families of state employees. For that matter, it is an argument against ANY employer providing ANY medical benefits. After all, if your company didn’t provide you with health insurance, their products and services would be cheaper to the public, right? And America as a whole would benefit…atleast that is how your argument goes.

    Let us know when you tear up your insurance card.

    For my part, I agree with the hundreds of private companies supporting the repeal of DOMA. Marriage equality enables them to compete for the best and brightest employees, regardless of sexual orientation. We should want that at every level of government too.


  57. - Yellow Dog Democrat - Thursday, Mar 28, 13 @ 8:17 am:

    Funniest argument against marriage equality: Kids are better off with no mom than two moms.


Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.


* State ordered to pay providers for pregnant women, infants and children
* Club for Growth runs McCarter ad
* Because... Madigan!
* NFIB member poll: 88 percent want Rauner to keep pushing Turnaround Agenda
* AFSCME advances bill that Rauner admin says "we cannot afford"
* Kim Foxx launches first TV ad "Amen"
* 2nd Annual "Cocktails with Capitol Fax"
* Has a "new" counter-point to the Tribune emerged?
* Credit Unions Assist At Risk Youth
* Question of the day
* Why I fight
* Parsons scores rare and highly unusual Obama interview
* Dunkin's defense
* Civic Federation wants spending limits and tax hikes: "There are no easy stop-gap fixes"
* *** LIVE SESSION COVERAGE ***
* "Mike Madigan's favorite state Senator"
* #Winning!
* In the spirit of the times...
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today's edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)
* Yesterday's blog posts

Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............


Search This Blog...

Search the 98th General Assembly By Bill Number
(example: HB0001)

Search the 98th General Assembly By Keyword

  
* AT&T, Apple targeted with patent infringement suit from haptics company Immersion
* WhatsApp brings more emojis to your Android 
* A congressional bill may decide how the US will approach encrypted smartphones
* Google might make a VR headset that doesn’t need a phone to work
* Paul McCartney creates love music for Skype’s Mojis
* Samsung pushing 91MB update to the Gear S2
* Did work on the Apple Car drive neighbors to file a noise complaint?

* White Sox reportedly considering Desmond
* Lefty-heavy rotation not a concern
* Melky: White Sox must play like family to contend
* White Sox remodel in big way this offseason
* White Sox ink Ishikawa to Minor League deal
* White Sox sign righty Latos to 1-year deal
* White Sox sign Mat Latos for one year, $3 million

...............


Main Menu
Home
Illinois
YouTube
Pundit rankings
Obama
Subscriber Content
Durbin
Burris
Blagojevich Trial
Advertising
Updated Posts
Polls

Archives
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005

Syndication

RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0
WordPress

Loading


* Madigan-backed committee attacks Hotle in maile.....
* AFSCME contract talks stall as parties await im.....
* Rauner: 'We're Winning, but It's Taking Longer .....


* Illinois residents weigh in on proposed coal mine expansion
* An urgent call for action made during university rally
* Illinois News Digest
* Children sue a former state legislature over pornography videos
* Jury sides with Illinois man in excessive force lawsuit
* Lawmakers urge federal agency to build campus in Illinois
* Aunt of teen accused in slaying charged with supplying gun
* Illinois News Digest
* Chicago man wins $1M lawsuit alleging police rigged lineup
* EXCHANGE: iPads enhance learning at Marion schools

* $45M and counting for $315M rail consolidation project
* Lawmakers making second attempt to send AFSCME talks to arbitrator
* President Obama returns to his political roots, connects with past friends, supporters
* Bill aims to create foundation to raise private money for state fairgrounds
* Obama returns to his political roots, connects with past friends, supporters
* Presidential visit notebook: Obama doesn't like horseshoes?
* District 186 misses out on construction bond program
* Vehicle emissions test notices suspended amid budget impasse
* Rauner: Bureaucracy is holding Illinois back
* Peoria's Par-A-Dice casino laying off 40, cites impact of video gaming

* Rush hospital president to retire
* What's next for O'Hare's gate construction plan?
* O’Hare finally catching up with rivals in jumbo jet space race
* O'Hare finally catching up with rivals in jumbo-jet space race
* Heidrick & Struggles adds consulting firm for $9.2 million


* Clinton, Sanders clash over minorities, money — and Obama
* Stars score early and often, close in on first-place Blackhawks
* Sneed: Hillary making time for her buddies on visit to Chicago
* Sneed: Hillary making time for her gal pals in visit to Chicago
* Sweet: Kirk backers inject Rahm in U.S. Senate race
* Watch the Patrick Sharp tribute video shown at tonight’s Blackhawks game
* Patrick Sharp reaches milestone against Blackhawks
* Patrick Eaves has a hat trick after one period against the Blackhawks
* WATCH: Patrick Sharp receives standing ovation from Blackhawks fans
* WATCH: Patrick Eaves beats Corey Crawford from impossible angle


* Witness: Indianapolis man promised $10K for home explosion
* 2 CTA workers hurt during Yellow Line derailment
* St. Alphonsus Liguori school to stay open after meeting funding, enrollment targets
* Chicago task force on police reform hears from residents
* Woman federally charged after escaping state charges in Endia Martin case
* 1 dead, 4 others wounded in West Side shootings
* Woman bilked Naperville man in 'arranged marriage' scam, police say
* Crest Hill man gets 39-year sentence for stomping wife to death
* Murder-suicide 911 call: 'Oh God! We better call'
* Illinois Youth Soccer bans heading for players 10 and younger


* $45M and counting for $315M rail consolidation project
* Lawmakers making second attempt to send AFSCME talks to arbitrator
* President Obama returns to his political roots, connects with past friends, supporters
* Our View: Illinois officials should heed Obama's call for civility, compromise
* Bill aims to create foundation to raise private money for state fairgrounds
* Bernard Schoenburg: State GOP past $250,000 in support for Rep. Avery Bourne
* Eugene Robinson: Rubio's revealing loop
* Derrik Gay: Reducing fossil fuel dependence aids U.S. troops
* George F. Will: Break the teeth-whitening monopoly
* Obama returns to his political roots, connects with past friends, supporters


* Perry adapting to Rivera's absence on diamond
* Tate: These programs aren't too classy
* 'Historical moment' burdened by history
* STM's Mammen has reason to celebrate
* Judge considers ex-girlfriends' testimony in sex case against police officer
* Area girls' basketball leaders (Week of Feb. 8)
* On campus: Area track standouts shine
* Update: Philo gas station's bid for wine tasting and gambling
* Bresee Tower in Danville
* Sports Talk 2-11-16


* Glenbard East ends regular season with win vs. East Aurora
* Priest with Aurora ties accused of sex assault
* Clinton, Sanders clash over minorities, money -- and Obama
* Chicago Auto Show debuts hot new cars, but dealers thinking SUVs
* Frazier reaches 2,000 as Batavia ties for UEC River title

* House lawmakers overcome hurdle on key tra...
* Rodney Davis talks funding with Bloomingto...
* The agency that fought Illiana gets a new ...
* Rep. Dold takes educational cruise down Ch...
* Lawmakers decry high turnover rate of VA h...
* CBD Oil, and politics
* Simon considering state Senate bid
* Killer Congressman Tom MacArthur trying to...
* Shutdown? State may not notice
* Rep. Bob Dold

* Senator Durbin Cosponsors Bipartisan Legis......
* Senator Durbin Asks Illinois VA to Act Aft......
* Durbin & Duckworth Seek EPA Review of Lead......

* Ward Room's Race to Watch: Illinois Senate......

* Explaining collective bargaining.
* The GOP moderate. His candidacy should terrify you.
* Cook County Clerk David Orr At Youth Voter Registration Event
* Clinton Gets Backing Of Congressional Black Caucus PAC
* President Obama Visits Springfield Urging Lawmakers To Compromise
* Clinton Gets Backing Of Congressional Black Caucus
* Audience At Chicago Police Task Force Meeting
* Chicago Police Accountability Task Force Community Forum
* Audience At Chicago Police Accountability Task Force Meeting
* Illinois Drivers Get Entangled In The State Budget Debacle


* Emergency Management Officials, National Weather Service Encourage Winter Preparedness - November is Winter Weather Preparedness Month in Illinois
* Keep Your Family Safe This Winter - November through February are leading months for carbon monoxide related incidents
* Governor Takes Bill Action
* Illinois Department of Labor Director Hugo Chaviano Awards Governor’s Award for Contributions in Health and Safety to the Illinois Refining Division of Marathon Petroleum Company LP
* State Regulator Elected Treasurer of Interstate Medical Licensure Compact




Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller