SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      Mobile Version     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
Another look ahead

Wednesday, May 15, 2013

* Yesterday, we took a look at an analysis by legal expert and Supreme Court watcher Kurt Jenkins. I followed up with Jenkins later in the day with this e-mail…

I’m curious how you think the Supreme Court roll call will break out on a pension bill. Doubt you can speculate much without an actual law, but wondered anyway.

Jenkins said I was right that he’d be hesitant to speculate, but he did offer this…

I think a few things are clear from the Court’s recent history. I don’t agree that the Kilbride Court is a political court; I think their opinions show it’s a pragmatic and fairly cautious one.

It’s deeply ingrained in appellate judges to be reluctant to step in and strike down what the political branches have done. They’ll only vote to overturn a statute if they feel they have no other choice, and that’s particularly true in a case like this that’s clearly important to the state.

So those attacking whatever bill the legislature passes will certainly have the burden of proof before the Court; this isn’t a race that starts out even.

That said, I think we’ll get a much clearer picture of the Court’s inclinations relatively soon. As you know, they’ve got the Kanerva v. Weems pension case in front of them now. It may well be heard on the September docket – if not, then certainly no later than the November docket. We’ll know far more about what the Justices’ concerns in this area of the law after seeing the Kanerva argument.

* Meanwhile, some of y’all have wildly overreacted to the news that Speaker Madigan predicted his pension plan would get a majority of at least four votes on the Illinois Supreme Court. But Madigan has insisted that he didn’t have any contact with any of the justices, he was just speculating. So, you can probably remove your tinfoil hats.

* Regardless, the questions continue. Tom Kacich

Does Madigan really have that much clout, I asked [former state Rep. Bill Black], that he can practically tell the Supreme Court how to rule on a major constitutional issue?

That’s not it, said Black. It’s that Madigan knows the Supreme Court members’ backgrounds and how they interact.

“I don’t think Sherlock Holmes would ever be able to trace any indication, verbal, written in code or whatever, that Mike Madigan would ever suggest to a Supreme Court justice how they should find a certain case. And I don’t think he would do so,” said Black, who served for 14 years in the Illinois House with Madigan.

“But I do think he has a very keen knowledge how that court works. And he certainly has a keen knowledge of where those people came from. I think that gives him an advantage. If anybody could understand how they would react to anything, it’s probably Speaker Madigan.”

- Posted by Rich Miller        

  1. - biased observer - Wednesday, May 15, 13 @ 11:13 am:

    i think this is very accurate analysis, consistent with a new paradigm about how this state deals with its pensions, reflective of the current financial abyss.

    It is obvious to any serious observer of the ongoing financial disaster that any approach to solve this issue must include significant pension reform, along with several other things which have been well discussed here (revenue, most importantly).

    So if we don’t have significant pension reform, there is no getting out of this mess. If the judges strike down legislation which involves significant pension reform, there is no getting out of this mess. The judges will be aware of this when considering the legality of such legislation.

  2. - Bobbysox - Wednesday, May 15, 13 @ 11:39 am:

    The whole idea is indeed IF there is another way of “getting out of this mess.” If Madigan’s plan passes, it might be difficult to argue that there is no other way out. One other way out would have been to pass the Cullerton plan, which had the agreement of many of the unions representing public employees. Another way out would be to raise taxes, as not wishing to raise taxes does not mean it is closed to the legislature. Another way out is to shift future costs to employers, saving money for the state in the long run. Another way out is to pay as scheduled at the expense of other services. Again, unpopular and undesirable do not make it a closed path. I find it difficult to embrace any logical conclusion that the drastic and unilateral cuts in Madigan’s plan that clearly diminish the pension benefit are the only way out. Maybe someone’s preferred way out, but not the only one.

  3. - cassandra - Wednesday, May 15, 13 @ 11:39 am:

    I still think the constitutional language is awfully strong and specific, although I understand why public employee groups would prefer not to take the chance.

    As to the notion that there is no getting out of this mess, I disagree. If the pensions are upheld as is for retirees and current employees, there are numerous options, many of which have been enumerated here by various commenters. The issue is, who pays, not that Illinois, a wealthy state, can’t pay. Is a tax increase one of the ways to pay. Absolutely, although not the only one. Is a tax increase politically impossible. Of course not. It’s all in the presentation. However, it seems that until the court has ruled, we’ll have to wait.

  4. - Curmudgeon - Wednesday, May 15, 13 @ 11:41 am:

    I disagree with Mr. Jenkins. The opinion striking down medical mal caps on “separation of powers” was illogical and poorly written. No deference to the legislature was shown. And I’ve argued there many times.

  5. - Norseman - Wednesday, May 15, 13 @ 11:43 am:

    === i think this is very accurate analysis, consistent with a new paradigm about how this state deals with its pensions, reflective of the current financial abyss. ===

    Wow, paradigm really. Is that what you get out of Jenkins response. Try reading it again a few times and see what you get for your pair of dimes.

    Jenkins provided beneficial analysis by noting that the Kilbride Court is not political. That’s all we ask. He also noted what most folks who are lawyers or who have followed legal actions already know, that is the courts try to support legislative enactments unless clearly in violation. This was the basis of Roberts decision upholding Obamacare.

    What’s not said is that courts also operate under the doctrine of “stare decisis,” which is “Latin for ‘let the decision stand.’” This is “a doctrine requiring that judges apply the same reasoning to lawsuits as has been used in prior similar cases.”

    There are a number of prior decisions that give us “hope” that they will guide the court in ruling against Madigan.

    There are also considerations about the plain language of a contested law and the intent in approving that law. Again, we hope that the clarity of the consitutions diminishment clause and the intent expressed by convention delegates will help support a ruling finding Madigan unconstitutional.

    I’m certainly not putting myself in the same class or even the same campus as Jenkins, but I don’t take his analysis as a “new paradigm.

  6. - thechampaignlife - Wednesday, May 15, 13 @ 11:48 am:

    Shouldn’t we also be considering how the federal courts will rule? Even if the IL Supremes rule it State constitutional, couldn’t the feds say it violates contract law? Or is that considered unlikely?

  7. - Rich Miller - Wednesday, May 15, 13 @ 11:49 am:

    ===Shouldn’t we also be considering how the federal courts will rule?===

    One at a time, man.

  8. - titan - Wednesday, May 15, 13 @ 12:05 pm:

    - biased observer (@ 11:13 am) - The state owes lots of folks:

    Service providers/vendors (the 1%ers) get paid late, but in full with a good rate of interest.

    Bond holders (also the 1%ers) get paid on time and in full.

    Pensioners (full of women and minorities) get the shaft.

    And that’s “constitutional”?

  9. - biased observer - Wednesday, May 15, 13 @ 12:12 pm:


    schools are already getting shaft and the shaft is getting longer. they are projected to be funded at 82% of their “promised” state aid next year.

    vendors (such as hospitals) are getting paid 18 months to 2 years late. further it is unpredictable. late payment is decreased payment . think about that. if you don’t understand I will try to explain it to you. most vendors are not 1%ers, hospitals for example. most hospitals run on such small margins that the will not be able to tolerate late payments. jobs are getting lost because of these delayed payments I can promise you. jobs are failing to be created because of these late payments I can promise you.

    would it affect your household finances if your paycheck or pension check were delayed by 18 months?

  10. - east central - Wednesday, May 15, 13 @ 12:20 pm:

    It would not be surprising to see the State courts want to have the initial ruling based upon contract issues. No one wants the blame for forcing an extension or expansion of the income tax increase.

    The GA wants the blame to be on the courts if this happens. The State SC having to rule against the pension legislation is a very real possibility given that the legislation will be doing almost precisely what the State Constitution clause was designed to prevent. I bet the State SC would prefer the blame to reside on a contracts basis within the federal system.

    To the extent that the Cullerton approach is “more constitutional” (both State and federal), it might be less of a hot potato for the courts.

  11. - titan - Wednesday, May 15, 13 @ 12:22 pm:

    @ biased observer - the public schools are for “little people” so shafting them is OK.

    Those paid late get what? 9%? 12% interest?

  12. - thechampaignlife - Wednesday, May 15, 13 @ 12:31 pm:

    One at a time but the legislators have to consider both when passing a law. If it gets struck down in either place, it’s back to the drawing board. Better to consider both courts now than make it through one, get shot down by the other, and be back at this 2-4 years from now. It may still happen anyway but we can at least try to mitigate it now.

  13. - Jim - Wednesday, May 15, 13 @ 12:59 pm:

    the high court not political? Oh, come on. burke not political. freeman not political. they cut their teeth on legal politics. are a couple of them apolitical? sure, but this court is definitely political.

  14. - Keyrock - Wednesday, May 15, 13 @ 1:11 pm:

    Agree totally with Jim.

    That being said, the constitutional language and legislative history are so clear that a majority may well enforce the constitution and strike down either Madigan’s or Cullerton’s bill. And, as we’ve discussed before, Madigan may be counting on that, as a way of transferring the political heat for a necessary tax increase (and/or a constitutional amendment for a graduated tax), so that a permanent fix can be enacted.

  15. - PublicServant - Wednesday, May 15, 13 @ 1:13 pm:

    Keyrock, honestly, that would fit the Madigan profile. He’s thinking 4 moves ahead in his Chess game when we all think it’s checkers that’s being played.

  16. - Ruby - Wednesday, May 15, 13 @ 1:16 pm:

    = the current financial abyss…ongoing financial disaster =

    These are very pessimistic, gloom and doom words to use considering that the stock market has been hitting new highs each week which signals an improved economy. This alone will bring in new tax revenue and improve the performance of the pension funds.

  17. - sk hicks - Wednesday, May 15, 13 @ 1:17 pm:

    Our State seems to spend a good deal of time crafting policy, then more time looking for ways to invalidate the language that was adopted. Until recently, no one seemed that confused as to what health insurance for 20 years service meant. If the language that was in place was so uncertain, why in the world did we ever need Tier II?

  18. - biased observer - Wednesday, May 15, 13 @ 1:20 pm:


    I’m going to save Rich some time on this one… can’t possibly be serious with this comment. Are you in the “manufactured crisis” camp, too?

  19. - Anon. - Wednesday, May 15, 13 @ 1:23 pm:

    ==One at a time but the legislators have to consider both when passing a law. If it gets struck down in either place, it’s back to the drawing board.==

    But how the federal courts might rule depends on how the Illinois courts do rule. For example, if the ILSC upholds Judge Narduli’s decision in Maag that health insurance is not covered by the pension clause and that the old statute did not itself create a contract, the USSC is supposed to respect the ILSC’s interpretation of the IL constitution and laws. On what basis would they overturn the decision? Of course, the USSC totally disrespected the Florida SC’s interpretation of Florida election laws in Bush v. Gore, so who can tell what they would do here?

    If the Illinois courts hold that the Maag legislation or pension reform is an impairment, but justified under police powers, then there is a federal impairment clause issue for the USSC to decide.

  20. - Pot calling kettle - Wednesday, May 15, 13 @ 1:26 pm:

    As I wrote yesterday, whether he can read the court or not, how else would the Speaker respond? Madigan is not going to say a key bill awaiting approval in the Senate won’t make it past the Supreme Court. Especially when he is the key proponent of that bill.

  21. - WilliamO - Wednesday, May 15, 13 @ 1:32 pm:

    Would the USSCT hear this case? It’s a state issue.

  22. - Chris - Wednesday, May 15, 13 @ 1:43 pm:

    “couldn’t the feds say it violates contract law?”

    What’s the hook for Federal Jurisdiction? Not a US Constitutional issue.

  23. - Ruby - Wednesday, May 15, 13 @ 1:46 pm:

    = Madigan is not going to say a key bill awaiting approval in the Senate won’t make it past the Supreme Court. Especially when he is the key proponent of that bill. =

    I totally agree!

  24. - inker - Wednesday, May 15, 13 @ 2:46 pm:

    Wait. I don’t think there will be an agreed bill. But in Conference Committee miracles sometimes happen.

    Just go back to River Boat gambling with Senator Denny Jacobs.

    President Cullerton is playing to the Unions and will probably gain 4-5 more seats in the Senate in the next election.

    I believe that Leader Watson had at one point 28 seats in the GOP caucus. What has happened? And he is a Cardinal fan.

  25. - Six Degrees of Separation - Wednesday, May 15, 13 @ 2:49 pm:

    @ Chris, Article One, Section 10 of the US Constitution says “No state shall…” and goes into several items including the impairment of contracts. Because the Constitution specifically mentions states in this way (one of the few places where it actually puts limitations on states) the impairment is a potential federal matter and can overrule a state SC if an impairment finding is made. That said, the USSC is usually deferential to state SC’s unless the breach is egregious.

  26. - Waldi - Wednesday, May 15, 13 @ 2:53 pm:

    The latest SRS newsletter had an article about a State sponsored Medicare plan. According to this article, effective 1/1/2014, Medicare primary retirees and survivors will be required to enroll in this state sponsored plan. It didn’t give any additional information.

    I think this state-sponsored plan is a Medicare Advantage plan. According to the Medicare website, an Advantage plan is insurance offered by private companies that are approved by Medicare, but its not the traditional Medicare. Also, if you opt to take an Advantage Plan in lieu of traditional Medicare, you cannot by law get gap insurance to cover any costs not included in the plan.

    It sounds to me that starting in 2014 the State is going to force all retirees to drop traditional Medicare (part b, I assume) and take their plan instead - and who knows how good that will be or what it will cover. Does anyone have any additional info on this?

  27. - Anon. - Wednesday, May 15, 13 @ 2:56 pm:

    ==What’s the hook for Federal Jurisdiction? Not a US Constitutional issue.==

    Article I, Section 10, of the US Constitution:

    “No state shall . . . pass any bill of attainder, ex post facto law, or law impairing the obligation of contracts.”

  28. - Rich Miller - Wednesday, May 15, 13 @ 2:57 pm:

    ===But in Conference Committee miracles sometimes happen.===

    They don’t do those any more.

  29. - Pacman - Wednesday, May 15, 13 @ 3:42 pm:

    Here is a link to a good read on how the Feds may look at the pension issue. It’s titled State and Local Pension Plans and Fiscal Distress: A Legal Overview.

  30. - Norseman - Wednesday, May 15, 13 @ 4:43 pm:

    Thank you for the link Pacman. It was a very informative paper. It does hold out some hope that a federal cause of action can be found to challenge pension reduction bill under the federal contract impairment clause. It also details hurdles to the success of such a challenge, including a judicial test as to whether there is an important policy need on the part of the state to impair the pension contract.

  31. - RNUG - Wednesday, May 15, 13 @ 4:57 pm:

    Waldi @ 2:53 pm:

    That appears to be the plan, retirees 65 up are going to lose QC and all the other HMO plans. Either take the Medicare Advantage Plan at whatever cost it ends up or keep your Medicare, drop out of the State insurance, and buy your own Medigap policy. There are pending bills that have the langauge for the (unknown) Advantage programs and bills to do an emergency procurement process to get it up and running by Jan 1 … so you know the State is going to get taken advantage of (pun intended) by the insurance companies.

    There’s a clear pattern here: the State is dumping any and all health insurance plans they think they can get away with … but the courts are going to have the final say before it is all over with.

  32. - retired and fed up - Wednesday, May 15, 13 @ 6:43 pm:

    AFSSCME negotiated the Medicare Advantage plan for retirees. I live in Northwest Indiana to be closer to my 89 year of mother and may not have access to local care through that plan starting 1/1. Thanks again AFSCME.

  33. - RNUG - Wednesday, May 15, 13 @ 9:23 pm:

    Just a head’s up to anyone interested in the pension topic … Ralph Martire will be speaking at the May 29th RSEA meeting in Springfield.

  34. - Not a constitutional expert - Wednesday, May 15, 13 @ 11:18 pm:

    Hey, Rich — one correction in your lead … the Illinois Supreme Court watcher’s name is Kirk Jenkins instead of Kurt Jenkins

Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.

* Happy Thanksgiving!
* *** UPDATED x1 *** Five unanswered questions
* *** UPDATED x1 *** Question of the day
* Caption contest!
* Crossing the line
* Moody's warns Illinois
* The Credit Union Difference
* *** UPDATED x1 - Franks responds *** Uh-oh
* Then and now
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today's edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)
* Yesterday's blog posts

Visit our advertisers...







Search This Blog...

Search the 98th General Assembly By Bill Number
(example: HB0001)

Search the 98th General Assembly By Keyword

* Sonos Trueplay makes Bluetooth speaker EQ smart
* Getting an iPad Air 2 for Thanksgiving on your iPhone? Same as a lot of other people
* Google+ web preview update brings 3-column view, context replies
* ZTE, Lenovo and Xiaomi inch away from Qualcomm, MediaTek chipsets
* Instagram adding multi-account support to Android app
* Exynos 8890 benchmark may literally be incredible
* WeChat intros mobile wallet in South Africa

* Starting Pitcher Rankings: Chris Sale and Jose Quintana maintain st...
* Scouting profile: Adam Engel
* Alex Avila will try to shed limitations with White Sox
* White Sox program provides kids real chance
* Johnson solid candidate for White Sox rotation
* White Sox sign catcher Avila to one-year deal
* White Sox sign catcher Avila to one-year deal


Main Menu
Pundit rankings
Subscriber Content
Blagojevich Trial
Updated Posts

November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005


RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0


* Will task force undo government glut? - Kankake.....
* State suffers from Rauner-Madigan machismo - Ka.....
* Politicians do serious damage to state's busine.....

* Foul play not suspected in death of southern Illinois woman
* Lawyers for Schock say documents handed over to prosecutors
* EXCHANGE: Highland art teachers exhibit works on campus
* Police make arrest in killing of Chicago 9-year-old boy
* Mascoutah burglary victim shot in 1st night at new home
* Closing of 2 Illinois harness racing tracks opposed
* Landfill cleanup to idle Rockford area sledding hill
* Hunters find body of missing southern Illinois woman
* EXCHANGE: Augustana digitizing Hauberg glass plate images
* Rauner faces challenges in move to block Syrian refugees

* Local free community college plans may be template for U.S.
* Rauner faces challenges in move to block refugees
* Vendor Payment Program suspended due to budget impasse
* Rauner pardons man found innocent of 1999 attack
* Springfield jobless rate falls again, to 5.1 percent
* Springfield police chief sees problems with body cam law
* Lawsuit challenges Illinois ban on marijuana campaign money
* Number of Illinois inmates released on parole climbing
* Bryce Benton circulating petitions to challenge Sen. Sam McCann in GOP primary
* Executive Mansion roof repairs nearing completion

* Retailers ready for shooting protests
* Mag Mile tied up by protest over Chicago teen's shooting
* Review: Sociale in the South Loop
* Her Barbie was a lawyer. Now she defends victims' rights
* Meet the guy making money off your food scraps

* Blackhawks rally for stunning victory with two late goals
* Aaron Schock’s lawyers voluntarily providing records sought by feds
* In wake of dashcam video, Emanuel must navigate political minefield
* White House under holiday lockdown after man jumps fence
* Trevor Daley turning the corner at both ends of the ice
* Rauner faces challenges in move to block Syrian refugees
* Brown: Simeon basketball players bring their A-game to court
* 16 reasons every Blackhawks fan should be thankful on Thanksgiving
* Blackhawks cool off Sharks; Kane extends point streak to 17
* Four more Laquan McDonald police dashcam videos released

* Tyshawn on swing when gangbangers out for revenge targeted him: prosecutors
* Blog: Mag Mile marchers protest Laquan McDonald shooting
* Some Black Friday shoppers balk at Laquan McDonald protests on Mag Mile
* Fiery crash in McHenry; bystanders try to free passengers
* Crowds close stores, march on Mag Mile to protest Laquan McDonald killing
* Ex-'American Idol' Lee DeWyze at home at Elk Grove tree-lighting
* Suit filed over former probation officer's misconduct
* Pop Warner team scrambling to raise money for national championship
* Cops: Will County explosions just legal shooting practice
* Charges: Former Illinois man abducted, assaulted teen; kept him shackled

* Charles Krauthammer: The Syrian immigration cul-de-sac
* Rob Elliott: EPA ethanol ruling affects more than energy policy
* Local free community college plans may be template for U.S.
* Rauner faces challenges in move to block refugees
* Vendor Payment Program suspended due to budget impasse
* Eugene Robinson: The GOP's political correctness dodge
* Douglas Holt: Woman's protest of Trump was misguided, inappropriate
* George Will: Muzzling pet advice another case of free speech erosion
* Bernard Schoenburg: Josh Langfelder took father's advice on election petition signatures
* Rauner pardons man found innocent of 1999 attack

* Football state championships notes: Arcola's win particularly special
* HS Football: Arcola returns to homecoming
* HS Football: Unity vs. Bishop McNamara Class 3A Championship
* How they line up: Illini vs. Wildcats
* How Northwestern analyst sees it
* Final Word: Squad soldiers on
* Tate: Hindsight 20/20 for location shift
* LIVE: Arcola wins title; Unity falls in 3A
* Arcola wins title; Unity falls in 3A
* Reporter mocked by Trump says the 2 knew each other well

* Crystal Lake South makes it 3-0
* Warren's best effort yet too much for Mundelein
* Benet makes it look easy against Bartlett
* Arlington Heights lights fantasy toys in North School Park
* Sabres snap skid with 4-1 win over Hurricanes

* House lawmakers overcome hurdle on key tra...
* Rodney Davis talks funding with Bloomingto...
* The agency that fought Illiana gets a new ...
* Rep. Dold takes educational cruise down Ch...
* Lawmakers decry high turnover rate of VA h...
* CBD Oil, and politics
* Simon considering state Senate bid
* Killer Congressman Tom MacArthur trying to...
* Shutdown? State may not notice
* Rep. Bob Dold

* Letter: Sen. Durbin is right on refugee is......

* Opinion: Sen. Kirk must stand with crimina......

* No Positive Loitering Tonight
* Fairness.
* It brings out the rats.
* If we are to get Goldman Sachs out of ESEA, we will have to be the ones to do it.
* Black Friday on North Michigan Avenue.
* Does America need a "council of elders"?
* Snow Money
* There's Snow Business
* Random Thoughts.
* ‘It’s beginning to look a lot like Christmas,’ several weeks ago!!!

* Emergency Management Officials, National Weather Service Encourage Winter Preparedness - November is Winter Weather Preparedness Month in Illinois
* Keep Your Family Safe This Winter - November through February are leading months for carbon monoxide related incidents
* Governor Takes Bill Action
* Illinois Department of Labor Director Hugo Chaviano Awards Governor’s Award for Contributions in Health and Safety to the Illinois Refining Division of Marathon Petroleum Company LP
* State Regulator Elected Treasurer of Interstate Medical Licensure Compact

    Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller