SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      Mobile Version     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact
CapitolFax.com
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
Question of the day

Wednesday, Oct 30, 2013

* Sen. Bill Brady and other Republicans have joined with House Speaker Michael Madigan to oppose appropriating money during the veto session to fund some state employee pay raises going back to 2011. Comptroller Judy Baar Topinka, however, believes the money should be allocated

“I think you’ll probably have to have a supplemental appropriation,” Topinka said at a Springfield news conference. “I don’t know how else you do it. Where else are you going to get the money? It’s not like it’s lying around. I don’t have bags of it sitting around the office.” […]

That includes $112 million needed to pay back wages — plus 7 percent interest — to about 25,000 union workers who were denied raises they were due under their previous labor agreement. Quinn suspended the raises, saying lawmakers did not approve money to pay them. The issue was taken to court, and a judge sided with the unions and said the state had to honor the back wages with interest. […]

House Speaker Michael Madigan, D-Chicago, has balked at the idea of approving a supplemental budget to pay the wages. He has said agencies should cover the back wages out of the spending plan approved by lawmakers in May.

Keep in mind that the fiscal year revenue forecast has been revised upward by about $360 million.

* The Question: Should the General Assembly vote to appropriate $112 million plus interest to fund the back pay, or should agencies be told to find the money within their own budgets and the $112 million+ be used to pay off other old bills? Take the poll and then explain your answer in comments, please.


survey tools

- Posted by Rich Miller        


69 Comments
  1. - reformer - Wednesday, Oct 30, 13 @ 1:39 pm:

    I suppose if the constitution doesn’t matter when it comes to pensions, why should it matter when it comes to contracts?


  2. - cynical retiree - Wednesday, Oct 30, 13 @ 1:53 pm:

    The legislature has made sure to receive their own back pay. The State employees signed a valid contract and did the work. The judge has spoken and they must be paid. Why on earth would the legislature leave a debt on the table with mandatory 7% interest until settled? That makes no fiscal sense.


  3. - Huh? - Wednesday, Oct 30, 13 @ 1:54 pm:

    Yes. The money is owed to the employees. Pay it now or pay it later. Sooner or later, somebody is going to file a lawsuit and get the money anyways.


  4. - Interest - Wednesday, Oct 30, 13 @ 1:58 pm:

    I hope they put off paying it as long as possible. 7 percent return is a decent investment.


  5. - Sir Reel - Wednesday, Oct 30, 13 @ 1:59 pm:

    I voted to pay. As a former non union employee who saw virtually no raises for years and was forced to take unpaid furlongs it’s hard to feel sympathy for the generous raises union employees received but the judge has ruled. But future contacts should be much less generous so we don’t end up here again.


  6. - Sir Reel - Wednesday, Oct 30, 13 @ 2:02 pm:

    Furloughs not furlongs. I must have been thinking of ways to boost my meager State pension!


  7. - PastorMike - Wednesday, Oct 30, 13 @ 2:06 pm:

    It was not the agencies fault not to pay them. The legislature failed to approve the initial payments, they should be on the hook for the payments plus the interest…


  8. - CircularFiringSquad - Wednesday, Oct 30, 13 @ 2:15 pm:

    Looks like the workforce is busy this afternoon
    Memo to Me./Ms. Pastor Mike the agencies were given huge lump sum budgets and they can decide to operate the government or hand out raises


  9. - Gathersno - Wednesday, Oct 30, 13 @ 2:17 pm:

    It’s too bad that community agencies can’t get 7% on what they are owed by the state. They only receive 1% on late payments after 90 due.


  10. - Nonplussed - Wednesday, Oct 30, 13 @ 2:18 pm:

    Does MJM understand we’re talking about 25K Patrick Ward’s here–to put it in terms he might appreciate.


  11. - Mason born - Wednesday, Oct 30, 13 @ 2:35 pm:

    I voted Yes.

    Those Wages are old bills pay them now.


  12. - downstate hack - Wednesday, Oct 30, 13 @ 2:40 pm:

    I voted no appropriation because if MJM opposes it then it will not happen, and I would like to be correct at least once this year.


  13. - Bourbonrich - Wednesday, Oct 30, 13 @ 2:44 pm:

    I voted to have a supplemental bill but I do think this is just the tip of the iceberg when it comes to what the State has the money to pay. Either going to be a lot fewer employees, fewer services or lower wages as the State goes forward unless increased revenues are found.


  14. - northstate - Wednesday, Oct 30, 13 @ 2:45 pm:

    Pay the back pay it is what is owed.


  15. - Grandson of Man - Wednesday, Oct 30, 13 @ 2:46 pm:

    I voted yes, because employees honored their end of the contract and the 7% interest payment should be avoided.


  16. - A guy... - Wednesday, Oct 30, 13 @ 2:46 pm:

    Shockingly to some friends here, I voted yes. Pay them. They’re owed and the court confirmed it. More interest isn’t the answer. Give them what they’re owed + the interest for screwing around with it in the first place. And don’t do it again.


  17. - Wheat13 - Wednesday, Oct 30, 13 @ 2:50 pm:

    Pay the employees. Judge ruled and now Quinn wants afscam to back him for gov again. That’s the only reason Quinn wants this debt paid.


  18. - Anonymous - Wednesday, Oct 30, 13 @ 2:54 pm:

    so since I retired last january and the State owes me twelve thousand in back wages plus interest are they going to recalculate my pension payment and also pay me the back pay I have been shorted on it since my retirement? I voted yes, pay-it and save some money instead of paying more!


  19. - Bourbonrich - Wednesday, Oct 30, 13 @ 3:02 pm:

    I think both choices pay the employees. The issue is do we add to this year’s budget or do we squeeze the current budget even more.


  20. - Jim'e' - Wednesday, Oct 30, 13 @ 3:24 pm:

    As I understand, some departments did find the money for back pay and have paid their workers. In light of the hugh structural deficit the State has departments should be tasked with finding this money within their currently appropriated budgets.


  21. - Johnny - Wednesday, Oct 30, 13 @ 3:25 pm:

    So, the question is: If the employees are NOT made whole in the near future, what kind of precedent does that set for future court decisions? At some point, the judge is going to have to actually enforce this somehow. Is this a Constitutional crisis? Right now, the Legislative and Executive Branches are giving the Judicial Brach the middle finger.


  22. - AFSCME Steward - Wednesday, Oct 30, 13 @ 3:30 pm:

    Has MJM suddenly become stupid or is he just playing another game ? The money from FY12 requires a supplemental because the fiscal year had already ended and there is no legal authority to pay it, including from budgets provided for FY14. Many agencies did pay FY13 back pay with FY14 funds, but not all received sufficient resources to do so. Any FY12 & FY13 money still owed now requires a supplemental appropriation. This statement by Madigan is really arrogant and over the top.

    “He has said agencies should cover the back wages out of the spending plan approved by lawmakers in May.”


  23. - Joan P. - Wednesday, Oct 30, 13 @ 3:32 pm:

    Pay what you owe.


  24. - gallerywalker - Wednesday, Oct 30, 13 @ 3:36 pm:

    It is money owed!! The judge ruled in our favor. An agreement is an agreement!! Wasting time is only costing the taxpayers more interest!!


  25. - Demoralized - Wednesday, Oct 30, 13 @ 3:37 pm:

    I voted yes. People don’t have to like it but it was a signed contract and a court has said that it must be honored. Pay the dang money and move on.

    ==the agencies were given huge lump sum budgets and they can decide to operate the government or hand out raises ==

    Not aware of how the process works are we. Good talking point though.


  26. - Tooyoungtoretire/TooOldtoquit - Wednesday, Oct 30, 13 @ 3:47 pm:

    Appropriate the money! The employees have bills to pay too! Mortgages, medical, and kids can’t be put on hold while the politicians play games with peoples livelihoods.


  27. - New rules - Wednesday, Oct 30, 13 @ 4:06 pm:

    I suppose if the constitution doesn’t matter when it comes to pensions, why should it matter when it comes to contracts?

    Yeah why should any contract matter?


  28. - Kyle s - Wednesday, Oct 30, 13 @ 4:12 pm:

    Yes pay what is owed why wait and make the taxpayer pay 7%


  29. - dupage dan - Wednesday, Oct 30, 13 @ 4:19 pm:

    So, we’re talking about raising the debt limit, in a manner of speaking, right? We are talking about a court decision, right?

    I am a state employee - I voted yes, go figure. I have skin in the game.

    For MJM, Brady and others to ignore a court order is outrageous. They passed a law, the court overturned - it’s a done deal. Hey MJM, Quinn passed a law, the court overturned and you won. You got your pay. It works both ways here, buddy.


  30. - dupage dan - Wednesday, Oct 30, 13 @ 4:24 pm:

    CFS, Demoralized is right - you appear to have no idea how agencies work. Budget line items can not be ignored. You can’t take funds earmarked for a program and move it to salaries. It is like the capital fund - people get upset that these funds are used to build roads. They will say, “don’t build the road, pay down the pension”.

    Can. Not. Be. Done.

    I checked - it seems you were the only one here who may have voted no. Wow, what courage.


  31. - Rich Miller - Wednesday, Oct 30, 13 @ 4:29 pm:

    ===So, we’re talking about raising the debt limit, in a manner of speaking, right? ===

    No we are not.

    Get your head outta DC.


  32. - Frustrated - Wednesday, Oct 30, 13 @ 4:42 pm:

    What is the point of signing contracts if we don’t have to pay them if we don’t like them?. Whether he agrees with it or not, it was negotiated and is a legal contract. If we let this slide what is to stop them from doing this again in the future with employees as well as vendors who have contracts with the state. Wouldn’t you think Mr. Madigan’s daughter, our Attorney General, would have told him contract law overrides opinion! This is a terrible presidence we are allowing! Pay what is owed! This is costing us tax payers more everyday we delay” Absurd. tired of being caught up in the political games we play. Now Quinn’s opponent wants to go on record of doing the opposite of what Quinn wants. State workers didn’t do this and have no control over the money wasted by the state agency….


  33. - dupage dan - Wednesday, Oct 30, 13 @ 4:57 pm:

    It was a rhetorical flourish, Rich, meant to highlight the idea that stunts do not equate to leadership. There are hard decisions to be made here. Decisions that affect the lives of human beings. MJM etal are using stunts to shrug off their sworn duty to conduct the state’s business. Much like the stunts that were used in that other place.


  34. - anon - Wednesday, Oct 30, 13 @ 5:04 pm:

    the money is laying around–quinn’s directors have found $60 million in GRF and more is OSF funds already–this was an almost $200m liability during the spring session now its been cut in half–use lapse funds in june to pay this expense off.


  35. - tch02 - Wednesday, Oct 30, 13 @ 5:04 pm:

    This is a ridiculous game being played by the politicians. Meanwhile, interest continues to accrue at 7%. If I was a legislator, I would have no issues, because I can magically file suit and get a judge to say pay me now! The front-line employees, however, must not only wait while these games are being played, but continue to watch the state spend funds on an abundance of other interests (think capitol redecorating), including lawyers!


  36. - Earl Shumaker - Wednesday, Oct 30, 13 @ 5:07 pm:

    Pay the employees what is owed. Don’t these elected officials realize that we have such things as contract law, that we have a judiciary for a reason? Apparently, Brady, Madigan and other elected officials did to take a class in an Introduction to Illinois State Government. I wonder


  37. - titan - Wednesday, Oct 30, 13 @ 5:10 pm:

    Are most agencies given line item budgets (as opposed to lump sum amounts) and restricted to spending the amounts within the specific line items?

    On that basis, isn’t a prior appropriation a legal requiremnt to paying?


  38. - Belle - Wednesday, Oct 30, 13 @ 5:14 pm:

    Pay them, you owe them, it’s been to court once, why go back again.
    Begin a new trend of paying bills that are owed by the State.


  39. - Johnnie F. - Wednesday, Oct 30, 13 @ 5:49 pm:

    To what date is the 7% owed??


  40. - Local Prez - Wednesday, Oct 30, 13 @ 5:55 pm:

    Let us not forget that all state union employees agreed to put of receiving negotiated wages to help the state out when they came to the Union and asked us to assist them in cost savings. Plus the millions saved when our members proposed several other cost saving measures for the State of Illinois. The time has come that the leaders of this state do the right thing. Pay the back wages owed, and lets move on to doing the work that we need to do.


  41. - Just The Way It Is One - Wednesday, Oct 30, 13 @ 6:40 pm:

    It’s their money, their livelihood, and they’ve earned it. Not to approve it is petty politics at its worst…!


  42. - Anonymous - Wednesday, Oct 30, 13 @ 6:45 pm:

    Honor the agreement you signed. Union workers agreed to a contract, now the State of Illinois should do their part and pay the back pay owed to all employees.


  43. - The Whole Truth - Wednesday, Oct 30, 13 @ 7:01 pm:

    The back pay is paid with either option offered. I say let the agencies pay for it out of their own budgets. From what I’ve seen first hand, there is enough belt tightening and better management that can and should be done within State agencies to pay what is owed.


  44. - Boozebuster - Wednesday, Oct 30, 13 @ 7:09 pm:

    Simply stated, the state employees earned it and the contract promised it! They should be paid per the agreement.


  45. - The Whole Truth - Wednesday, Oct 30, 13 @ 7:17 pm:

    wldgmwdow-
    The vote is how the wages should be paid, not if.


  46. - state retired - Wednesday, Oct 30, 13 @ 7:38 pm:

    I’m retired now but still owed the back wages. But at the 7 percent interest the judge ordered the state to pay in addition to what’s owed I say take your sweet time Illinois that’s twice my COLA. You can’t fix stupid.


  47. - Anon. - Wednesday, Oct 30, 13 @ 7:47 pm:

    I voted no, because there is already enough money to pay them. Let them go back to court and get the judge to order the agencies to fulfill their contractual obligations, even though it will mean not paying the directors, assistant directors, deputy directors, assistant deputy to the assistant directors, etc., who do not have a contractual right to continue working and being paid.


  48. - The People - Wednesday, Oct 30, 13 @ 8:07 pm:

    One way for the state agencies to use money already allocated by the legislature is to eliminate CMS. CMS charges each agency for every computer in use, software license in use, and vehicle lease. CMS also charges for technical support for the leased computers. The elimination of the political appointees salary and benefits that run CMS would also help pay down old bills.


  49. - Demoralized - Wednesday, Oct 30, 13 @ 8:31 pm:

    ==The vote is how the wages should be paid, not if.==

    Agencies don’t have an extra $100 million lying around. Some of you need a primer on the budget.


  50. - Demoralized - Wednesday, Oct 30, 13 @ 8:32 pm:

    @Anon 7:47:

    I seriously hope you were joking.


  51. - RNUG - Wednesday, Oct 30, 13 @ 8:34 pm:

    Not sure this would work but I think there is a third possibility that may have been overlooked. Every employee who is owed back salary should go to the Illinois Court of Claims and file their claim as a lapsed FY13 debt. Given the prior ruling, the Court of Claims should have to acknowledge the claim as valid and order the bill paid by the agency, presumably with any FY13 lapse funds. Wouldn’t be pretty because it would completely overwhelm the system, but might be a way to get paid …


  52. - Demoralized - Wednesday, Oct 30, 13 @ 8:43 pm:

    @RNUG:

    Good thought but I think salaries are a different issue. There is a separate back wage claim process that I think must be followed. I’m not sure you can file wage claims with the Court of Claims. Something to look into though.


  53. - jimbo26 - Wednesday, Oct 30, 13 @ 8:50 pm:

    A contract is a contract.


  54. - The Whole Truth - Wednesday, Oct 30, 13 @ 9:06 pm:

    Demoralized 8:31:
    Having first hand knowledge of one state agency and close contact with several others, I believe there is room for 5%-10% of each agency’s budget to be earmarked for the raises. There would be a hue and cry, but it is possible. Start with the state vehicles being driven home and for personal use and the padded overtime cards. Baseline budgeting being what it is, if each agency merely maintained the previous FY’s budget, the money is there. That’s the type of approach directors and managers know they should and can take, but the leadership to do so has to come from PQ and the Legislature. So far, that hasn’t happened.


  55. - Anonymous - Wednesday, Oct 30, 13 @ 9:07 pm:

    Back pay is an OLD bill!!


  56. - dr. smooth - Wednesday, Oct 30, 13 @ 9:58 pm:

    state employees work a dangerous job everyday not just two or three days out of the week. walk into any prison, and you gather 100 inmates in one place and it is guaranteed that 98 of them have a shank and we have nothing but a radio, now you tell me how would you feel if that was your WIFE! Pay us!


  57. - Anonymous - Wednesday, Oct 30, 13 @ 10:15 pm:

    Pay the employees the money they are due. If over the years Madigan wouldn’t have been so worried about padding his cronies pocket and his we would have the money. It’s time for him to go he has way to much power and has been abusing it for years.


  58. - RNUG - Wednesday, Oct 30, 13 @ 10:25 pm:

    Demoralized @ 8:43 pm:

    According to the 2011 Court of Claims Rules, p7:

    Summary of Jurisdiction

    The Court has exclusive jurisdiction in the following matters:

    2. All contract claims against the State.

    /endquote

    There may be other overriding statute but that statement seems pretty clear. And doesn’t the back pay claim result from a contract?

    It’s not mandatory but you will probably have to have a lawyer and you are supposed to exhaust all other remedies first … don’t know and couldn’t guess how the Court would view the current status. The court will probably take a dim view of 10,000 employees filing and burying them when the court usually only handles 8,500 cases a year. And there would be a fair amount of cost involved to file the paperwork … but it might be a way to get the previous judgement enforced if you can get past the exhaust remedies restrictions.


  59. - Demoralized - Wednesday, Oct 30, 13 @ 10:45 pm:

    =I believe there is room for 5%-10% of each agency’s budget to be earmarked for the raises==

    I’ve been doing this for 16 years and still do and I can tell you that no agency has 5% or 10% of their budget to earmark for this and even if they did they couldn’t do it on their own. They would still need legislative approval to move the money around. If somebody told me that I needed to come up with the money some of these agencies need to come up with to pay these back raises I would ask them which rock they wanted me to look under. Might be possible in some agencies but I guarantee you in the large ones they don’t have tens of millions of dollars lying around for this.


  60. - Demoralized - Wednesday, Oct 30, 13 @ 10:48 pm:

    @RNUG:

    I’m sure there are employees out there that would be interested in your approach. I would actually be interested in somebody trying it just to see what happened.


  61. - Demoralized - Wednesday, Oct 30, 13 @ 10:50 pm:

    @The Whole Truth:

    Let me be clear that I think there are always places to find money but I just don’t think there are enough places to find this amount of money.


  62. - RNUG - Wednesday, Oct 30, 13 @ 10:57 pm:

    plus it would be a ‘civilian’ making the claim


  63. - The Whole Truth - Thursday, Oct 31, 13 @ 7:57 am:

    Demoralized 10:45PM:
    The 5%-10% isn’t just lying around…as I said, there would be a hue and cry. However, the U of I recently spent $70M+ to renovate Lincoln Hall in a “historically accurate” manner. Not because of any structual reason, but because the administration wanted to preserve the ambiance. Nice job, but not a wise use of funds given today’s situation. Couple that with the recent Capitol renovations, and the $100M could have been found very easily. Looking at only the personnel line items, many employees are boosting their salary 10%-20% and more….from what I saw, a big part of that is being “padded”. It would vary from agency to agency, but the fat (mismanagement) is there.


  64. - Anon. - Thursday, Oct 31, 13 @ 8:24 am:

    ==@Anon 7:47:

    I seriously hope you were joking.==

    Not really. I expect that before it came to laying off at-will employees, there would be a supplemental appropriation. I was pointing out that the claim that there was not enough money to pay the raises is wrong if the appropriated amount is greater than the total owed, and that you cannot get out of contractual obligations by arguing that paying your debts won’t leave you with enough money for discretionary expenditures. If they want to keep at-will employees on, but don’t have enough money to pay them without breaching their contracts to union employees, they have to pay the contractual obligations firat and appropriate additional money to pay the at-will employees. They could also lay off union employees, following the contractual requirements of course, but you can’t just abridge a contract.


  65. - led hed - Thursday, Oct 31, 13 @ 8:26 am:

    If a judge ruled it should be paid, then the law has spoken. What needs to be pointed out in the press is the fact that in the spring session, there was a bill to pay the back wages that was 44-48 million dollars, depending on what you were reading. It was widely believed there were enough bipartisan votes in both houses to pass it, but a certain speaker of the house blocked it from being introduced. Six months later, it’s going to take a 112 million to pay what’s owed. If my math is right, one certain speaker just cost the taxpayers of this state app. 66 million dollars. Will he be held accountable in a criminal or civil court? Will he face impeachment? Shouldn’t the state’s attorney general’s office take action against this person? Or is there a conflict of interest existing here…..?


  66. - ??? - Thursday, Oct 31, 13 @ 8:56 am:

    AFSCME Steward brings up an interesting point. I’m not sure, but I believe he’s right - there is no authority in the current budget to pay back wages owed from FY12. A supplemental appropriation might be the only option.


  67. - The old dad - Thursday, Oct 31, 13 @ 4:09 pm:

    Pay it because it the right thing to do!
    Lead by example and do the right thing! Honor the judges decision.


  68. - bearsfan - Friday, Nov 1, 13 @ 8:49 am:

    when the politicians had to go without their pay they resolved it pretty quick.I risked my life everyday doing my job so pay me.It is the right thing to do.


  69. - redraider - Friday, Nov 1, 13 @ 12:08 pm:

    I love the comments that it should be paid out of agency budgets. If paid out of their budgets they will not have the tools needed to do their jobs. In prisons you “smart guys” expect employees to pick either safety or their back pay. Classy thought. (AfSCAM) More intelligent thought from the union busters.


Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.


* Reader comments closed for the weekend
* Today's number: 89 percent
* Today's video: Rauner victory lap
* Ask a silly question...
* Blagojevich arrested eight years ago today
* Pritzker, Lisa Madigan added to enemies list
* Rauner loves him some DeVos
* Good news for Mitsubishi plant?
* Cullerton to Rauner: Cut a deal with AFSCME before pension reform
* The finger-pointing continues
* Sneed: Madigan "disappointed" in Kennedy's fundraising this year
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today's edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)
* Yesterday's blog posts

Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............
<


Search This Blog...

Search the 98th General Assembly By Bill Number
(example: HB0001)

Search the 98th General Assembly By Keyword

  
* Fitbit CEO drops some details on the Pebble acquisition
* Blass: Huawei Mate 9 sales in US to begin January 6
* SoundCloud takeover by Spotify is dead in the water
* U.S. carriers respond to Samsung’s kill switch for the Galaxy Note 7
* HTC 10 Revisited: Now with Android 7.0 Nougat
* Talk Android Podcast: Episode 18
* MacRumors Giveaway: Win a Huge Holiday Prize Pack From Pad & Quill

* Abreu thrilled for reunion with Moncada
* Giolito excited to join White Sox talent haul
* White Sox steal show at Winter Meetings
* A tale of two Sox at Winter Meetings
* Other clubs' closer search may lead to Robertson
* White Sox add righty Covey in Rule 5 Draft
* White Sox steal show at Winter Meetings

...............


Main Menu
Home
Illinois
YouTube
Pundit rankings
Obama
Subscriber Content
Durbin
Burris
Blagojevich Trial
Advertising
Updated Posts
Polls

Archives
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005

Syndication

RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0
WordPress

Loading


* Santa's naughty and naughty list - Chicago Tribune..
* Anti-abortion medical providers argue against I.....
* Budget uncertainty begins anew for universities.....
* Budget uncertainty begins anew for universities.....
* Budget uncertainty begins anew for universities.....


* More than $125K raised for 3 Chicago sisters found alone
* New webcam shows live views of Illinois bison herd
* EXCHANGE: New license plate design yields more Decatur jobs
* EXCHANGE: St. Joseph man an authority on military artifacts
* Chicago man sentenced to 6 yrs for seeking sex with girl
* Suburban overpass named after state trooper who was killed
* Donor drops gold coin worth $1,200 into Kankakee kettle
* Chicago poised to pay $5.3 million in 2 police shootings
* 1946 Atlanta hotel fire echoed in Oakland warehouse disaster
* Anti-abortion medical providers argue against Illinois law

* Anti-abortion medical providers argue against Illinois law
* $3M in emergency funds headed to Illinois community colleges
* Springfield-area veterans join pipeline protest
* Rauner asks Democrats for budget proposal, cancels meeting
* Comptroller: State employee bonuses on hold during impasse
* Rauner signs Exelon subsidy to spare 2 nuclear plants
* Rauner to sign Exelon subsidy to spare 2 nuclear plants
* Judge blocks administration from imposing contract on AFSCME
* State budget still elusive as leaders lash out
* Illinois budget still elusive as leaders lash out

* CME's Duffy will get big pay raise as CEO
* Trust a priceless commodity in Springfield budget dance
* Stocks stretch rally to new highs
* Trump team is asking for ways to keep nuclear power alive
* Chicago's the last stop for Wall Street's old bond salesmen


* Obama guidance, press schedule Dec. 10, 11, 2016. The week ahead
* Man seriously hurt in Princeton Park shooting
* For Chicago’s Sa’Rayah, ‘The Voice’ just part of a journey
* Experimental skin patch tests sweat for health as you work out
* Gang member loses $6M of legal windfall to shooting victim
* Mind of fishermen on first ice: Starting around Chicago fishing
* Jeep Renegade: rugged-cute design, legit off-road chops
* Man shot in foot during robbery attempt in Washington Park
* Man with schizophrenia missing from Englewood since August
* Police: Man shot dead in Chatham


* Widow of man slain in Aurora one year ago: 'We need to find these killers'
* Employment network helps convicted felons reconcile the past and move forward
* Hard to replace Dexter Fowler in clubhouse, but life goes on for Cubs
* Preparing for White House, Trump to attend Army-Navy game
* Lucas Giolito eager for 'fresh' start after humbling shot in big-leagues
* The story of the U.S. veterans who apologized for the United States military at Standing Rock
* LINDA C. BLACK HOROSCOPES for 12/10/16
* Wade Davis' credentials shine as brightly as more heralded closers
* Google opens its digital assistant to developers in race against Amazon's Alexa
* Bears need reality check concerning futures of Vic Fangio and Matt Barkley


The widget AQL4JYGHIY powered by Feed Informer does not exist.


* Charles Krauthammer: Tweets and theater entertain, but Congress is the main event
* Brent Bohlen: All are precious
* Anti-abortion medical providers argue against Illinois law
* Our View: Thumbs Up/Thumbs Down for the week
* $3M in emergency funds headed to Illinois community colleges
* Springfield-area veterans join pipeline protest
* Bernard Schoenburg: Bustos gets leadership post, criticizes Rauner
* Our View: Lawmakers should withdraw their lawsuit over paychecks
* George Will: The sensitivity police strike again
* Eugene Robinson: The proliferation of fake news presents real perils


* Daily Digest: Reindeer ornaments offered at zoo
* PODCAST: The Roofing Dog 12-10-16
* PODCAST: Daniel E. Holder & Associates 12-10-16
* PODCAST: Mettler Center 12-10-16, massage therapy
* PODCAST: Servpro 12-10-16
* Snow this weekend, Arctic cold next week
* Goodfellow Fund 12/10/16
* Unit 4 may get some leeway on land near Interstate Drive
* Bettendorf's State Street closed during house fire
* Danville school board set to vote on tax levy


* 2 Texas teams on top of their divisions hit the road
* Okaka double leads Watford to 3-2 win over Everton in EPL
* Falcons receiver Sanu out Sunday vs Rams; Jones questionable
* Obama orders review of election-season hacking
* Gambia's president-elect says Jammeh can't demand new vote

* House lawmakers overcome hurdle on key tra...
* Rodney Davis talks funding with Bloomingto...
* The agency that fought Illiana gets a new ...
* Rep. Dold takes educational cruise down Ch...
* Lawmakers decry high turnover rate of VA h...
* CBD Oil, and politics
* Simon considering state Senate bid
* Killer Congressman Tom MacArthur trying to...
* Shutdown? State may not notice
* Rep. Bob Dold

* Sens. Durbin and Graham introduce bill to ......
* New bi-partisan bill gives hope to undocum......

* Sen. Mark Kirk Cheers Illinoisans, Cubs Du......

* Breaking. Judge orders TRO against Rauner and for state workers.
* Keeping retirement weird. My mother never asked permission to protest.
* Just over 80 days away ‘til Election Day (already?!?), at least for some of us
* TASC Offers Roll Call Videos for Law Enforcement: The Science of Addiction, Building Partnership with Treatment
* Chicago aldermen snub Trump for spotlighting city's violence
* Loss of General Kelly's son in Afghanistan behind moving comments
* Rep. Ives: IL rewrites energy policy and bails out biggest US nuclear power company
* Giuliani pulls out of contention for Trump's Sec of State
* RASI members collect toys, food and clothes for holidays
* To my Milwaukee friends and readers.


* Criminal justice, health services stakeholders convene for Data-Driven Health & Justice Conference - Event will emphasize innovative strategies to address “superutilizers” of emergency departments and jails
* Know Before You Go with IDOT'SWinter Road Conditions Map
* Governor’s Export Awards Recipients Announced
* Governor Signs Legislation to Protect Jobs, Ratepayers and Taxpayers
* Give The Gift Of A Lifetime With A College Illinois!® 529 Prepaid Tuition Plan - College Illinois! can help limit or even eliminate future student loan debt




      Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller