SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      Mobile Version     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
Cross voted for it before he was against it

Wednesday, Jan 22, 2014

* Nina Totenburg reports on yesterday’s US Supreme Court hearing

At issue: whether nonunion members can be required to pay fees to help cover the cost of negotiating a contract from which they benefit.

In Illinois 10 years ago, 28,000 home health workers who care for adults with disabilities approved a union. Since then, hourly wages have nearly doubled, the workers now receive regular training, and they have health insurance. The state says as a result, the workforce has been stabilized and professionalized, and the government has saved money by keeping adults with disabilities in their homes.

Some workers, however, object to paying what is known as “fair share” fees. That is, even though they haven’t joined the union, they are required to pay their fair share of the costs of negotiating and administering a union contract they benefit from. The Supreme Court has long allowed such fees to prevent nonmembers from free-riding on union members’ dues. But in recent years, some of the court’s conservatives have suggested they may be prepared to reverse this long-established principle. And Tuesday’s case presents that opportunity.

The state says it actually has saved $632 million by creating a stable workforce to care for adults with disabilities in their homes instead of nursing homes.
One of the questions before the U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday is whether non-union members must pay for negotiating a contract they benefit from. […]

And the workers and their patients say the union has transformed a program that previously had been hobbled by rapid turnover.

“I have a son that has cerebral palsy,” said Flora Johnson, a home care worker who serves on the union’s executive committee. “They tried to get me to institutionalize him years ago. But by the union coming in, he got a chance to stay home with his family.”

* LA Times

In its lawsuit, the right-to-work attorneys portrayed the arrangement as a questionable deal between state Democrats led by former Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich and union officials. Alito picked up on the theme.

“Gov. Blagojevich got a huge campaign contribution from the union and, virtually as soon as he got into office, he took out his pen and signed an executive order that had the effect of putting $3.6 million in the union coffers,” Alito told U.S. Solicitor Gen. Donald Verrilli Jr., who joined in defending Illinois. The judge was referring to the $3.6 million in dues paid to SEIU after home-care providers were organized.

Verrilli denied that partisan politics were at play, noting that a “large bipartisan majority” of the Illinois Legislature voted in favor of the decision to extend union bargaining rights to the home-care providers.

The measure passed 51-2-5 in the Senate (Barack Obama voted “Present,” Dan Rutherford voted “No” and Kirk Dillard voted “Yes”) and 115-0 in the House.

* But Gov. Quinn expanded the scope of that legislation with an executive order in 2009.

In 2009, Governor Pat Quinn issued an executive order directing the State to recognize an exclusive representative for the Disabilities Program personal assistants, if a majority so chose. In a mail ballot election, however, a majority of the approximately 4,500 Disabilities Program personal assistants rejected representation by any union. Nevertheless, a union can request new elections in the future, and, under Illinois labor law, may bypass an election altogether if it collects a sufficient number of union cards from the personal assistants.

In 2010, personal assistants from both groups filed a two-count complaint against the Governor and the three unions involved. The Rehabilitation Program plaintiffs claimed that the fair share fees they were required to pay violated the First Amendment by compelling their association with, and speech through, the union. The Disabilities Program plaintiffs argued that although they did not yet pay fees, they are harmed by the threat of an agreement requiring fair share fees. The district court dismissed the Rehabilitation Program plaintiffs’ claims for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. It dismissed the Disabilities Program plaintiffs’ claims for lack of subject matter jurisdiction because they lacked standing and their claims were not ripe.

The Seventh Circuit Decision

Writing for a unanimous panel, Judge Manion held that, with respect to the Rehabilitation Program plaintiffs, the fair-share fees withstand First Amendment scrutiny, in that they are, for First Amendment purposes, identical to the fees upheld by the Supreme Court in Abood v. Detroit Bd. of Educ.

Note that personal assistants from both groups of personal assistants have filed suit. Why is that important? Well, let’s revisit Tom Cross’ press release from yesterday

“I believe forcing Illinois home-care workers to join a union and pay labor dues against their will violates both their right to free association and freedom of speech. For too long, the leadership in Illinois has focused on rewarding special interests as opposed to making common sense decisions that are fiscally prudent and defend core individual rights. It is not the job of state government to pick winners and losers, in this case seeking to bolster falling union membership; instead, elected leaders must put the common good before all else. My hope is the Supreme Court hears the arguments in this case and comes to the conclusion that Illinois’ actions are unconstitutional and cannot be allowed to stand.”

From the bill Rep. Cross voted for in 2003

Provides that a labor organization recognized by Executive Order to represent personal care attendants or personal assistants shall be the exclusive representative of those individuals.

- Posted by Rich Miller        

  1. - ChambanaSlamarama - Wednesday, Jan 22, 14 @ 10:36 am:

    The other bad news is that Cross now has a Democratic opponent who has just announced his campaign. Phew, thought he was going to have a free ride with no opponent there for awhile.

  2. - Roadiepig - Wednesday, Jan 22, 14 @ 10:42 am:

    In Cross’ case, it must have been one of those bills that he didn’t read but voted on anyway. How else can you explain having such a strong opinion against it today, when you were part of a unanimous yes vote for it a decade ago?

  3. - walker - Wednesday, Jan 22, 14 @ 10:46 am:

    ===How else can you explain…?===

    The ideological purity tests required to play with the ILGOP have changed that much in ten years.

  4. - Anon - Wednesday, Jan 22, 14 @ 10:52 am:

    == Illinois´actions are unconstitutional and cannot be allowed to stand.==
    Cross in 2014 commenting on Cross´vote in 2003

  5. - AFSCME Steward - Wednesday, Jan 22, 14 @ 11:04 am:

    I have a simple solution for this. Those that object to fair share will be paid what workers received before collective bargaining and will receive all benefits workers received back then. I wonder how many would complain about fair share then ? There are a lot of freeloaders in our society. They want stuff, but don’t want to pay for it. It costs money for union representation. That is why dues & fair share are needed. I would not object if the SCOTUS threw out the fair share provision provided it was with the understanding that if you don’t join the union the state can pay you whatever it wishes, charge you as much as it wants for health care, removes rights to representation at discipline hearings & grievances would only be handled as per the personnel code, not the union contract. If these requirements were in place, there would be no fair share, only members. My view, if you don’t want to pay, you don’t get the benefit. Unfortunately, currently the law requires us to represent members & fair share equally.

  6. - RNUG - Wednesday, Jan 22, 14 @ 11:23 am:

    As I said yesterday, the biggest problem with “fair share” is the lack of transparency on the use of union dues. Right now the “fair share” is whatever the union says it is.

    If a union wants non-union members to pay a “fair share” for representation, then that union’s books should be open to public inspection by anyone so the “fair share” can be easily determined.

  7. - dupage dan - Wednesday, Jan 22, 14 @ 11:34 am:

    === The state says it actually has saved $632 million by creating a stable workforce to care for adults with disabilities in their homes instead of nursing homes ===

    And as unionization takes hold, we typically see pay rise. Since labor costs are typically a major factor in such a “business”, at what point does the cost of this care reach a level that nears NH costs and the state sees the previously touted savings shrink to an inconsequential level?

    I know that isn’t totally on point with the discussion but it is a factor that makes the touted savings less of a positive factor in the dismal state fiscal picture.

  8. - Wilbert - Wednesday, Jan 22, 14 @ 11:38 am:

    Did Cross check with Dillard to make sure there’s enough room for him on the Flip-Flop Express?

  9. - AFSCME Steward - Wednesday, Jan 22, 14 @ 11:38 am:

    Dupage Dan

    In addition to cost, I think quality of life also needs to be a concern. Having a stable professional care giver system is not only cost effective, but it increases the chances that the person can reside at home with the family, rather than in an institution.

    “And as unionization takes hold, we typically see pay rise. Since labor costs are typically a major factor in such a “business”, at what point does the cost of this care reach a level that nears NH costs and the state sees the previously touted savings shrink to an inconsequential level?”

  10. - dave - Wednesday, Jan 22, 14 @ 11:49 am:

    **at what point does the cost of this care reach a level that nears NH costs and the state sees the previously touted savings shrink to an inconsequential level?**

    NH costs are 2-3 times more than the cost to keep someone in his/her home. The State is a LONG way away from having home care costs approaching the same costs as nursing homes. And nursing home rates don’t just stay flat either.

  11. - Chi - Wednesday, Jan 22, 14 @ 12:12 pm:

    I think you made this point last year or thereabouts and I informed you then, as I will again now:
    Public employee unions must share with their bargaining unit (members and non-members alike) once a year, an audit showing their finances that includes how much money was spent on chargeable and non-chargeable expenses.

    It is not open to the public because, frankly, it’s none of the public’s business. It’s the business of the people in the bargaining unit.

  12. - MrJM - Wednesday, Jan 22, 14 @ 12:27 pm:

    Has Tom Cross been tested for early-onset Dillarditis?

    – MrJM

  13. - Andrew Szakmary - Wednesday, Jan 22, 14 @ 12:27 pm:

    Why is it that conservatives consistently object to fair share for union representation when someone accepts a job in a workplace represented by a union, but do not object to homeowner association dues when someone purchases a home in a subdivision that has an association? Intellectually this makes no sense, any more than saying that contractual obligations can be broken when it comes to pension recipients but not bondholders. Methinks conservatives have lost their minds.

  14. - RNUG - Wednesday, Jan 22, 14 @ 12:29 pm:


    Sorry, I didn’t remember that but it’s still not an independent audit. My father and grandfather were founders of a union local; I’ve seen how the books can be cooked.

  15. - Rich Miller - Wednesday, Jan 22, 14 @ 12:34 pm:

    RNUG, things are a lot different now than the old days.

  16. - Ghost - Wednesday, Jan 22, 14 @ 1:04 pm:

    Chi and RNUG, if you look around their are posters showing the annual expenditures of the unions. They submit these annualy to be posted in the work place, and it gives decent detail. it shows what they spend on their work force, for political stuff etc etc. what money moves to the national for thier expenses; the expense of the national and so forth.

    I agree with AFSCME Steward, lets get rid of fair share, but also allow the State to pay anyone who is not fair share whatever they like. As I mentioned before the non union folks have had a pay freeze since 2003, and numerous cuts and reductions since then.

    I am all for them not having to pay if the State can lump the non-fair share folks into a seperate grp and treat with them differently.

  17. - Bemused - Wednesday, Jan 22, 14 @ 1:32 pm:

    Most if not all of the info you want can be found in fillings by the Unions at USDOL.

  18. - wordslinger - Wednesday, Jan 22, 14 @ 1:37 pm:

    Alito is the most partisan justice of our times.

  19. - RNUG - Wednesday, Jan 22, 14 @ 2:49 pm:

    Thanks for the info. I’ll go look at it.

Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.

* Reader comments closed for the weekend
* Sign of the times?
* Question of the day
* Exelon Just Received A $1.7 Billion Rate Increase Through The Market-Based Capacity Auction
* Today's number: 60
* No imminent power shut-offs
* Chamber all-in on impasse
* COGFA: State receipts down almost a billion dollars in first quarter
* Two racetracks will likely close
* "How many babies have to die?"
* Report: "A billion-dollar giveaway rife with failure"
* Frerichs warns of impasse consequences
* Quinn touring the state
* Yesterday's blog posts

Visit our advertisers...







Search This Blog...

Search the 98th General Assembly By Bill Number
(example: HB0001)

Search the 98th General Assembly By Keyword

    * Weather 360 joins the storm of weather apps vying for your consideration
    * What could have improved the Nexus 6P?
    * Talk Android Apps of the Week: October 4, 2015
    * iPhone 6s, Samsung Gear S2, Nexus 6P comments & more – Pocketnow Daily Recap
    * Jetpack Joyride brings you Back to the Future theme for October
    * Viber: “heart” messages, more characters, forward public chats
    * Samsung Galaxy Active Neo coming to Japan

    * Montas solid, but offense silenced in finale
    * Sale, Abreu among White Sox record setters
    * Montas solid, but offense silenced in finale
    * Hahn discusses Garcia's future with White Sox
    * Eaton, Flowers to have offseason surgery
    * Garcia gives White Sox walk-off win vs. Tigers
    * White Sox relish in walk-off as season nears end


    Main Menu
    Pundit rankings
    Subscriber Content
    Blagojevich Trial
    Updated Posts

    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011
    August 2011
    July 2011
    June 2011
    May 2011
    April 2011
    March 2011
    February 2011
    January 2011
    December 2010
    November 2010
    October 2010
    September 2010
    August 2010
    July 2010
    June 2010
    May 2010
    April 2010
    March 2010
    February 2010
    January 2010
    December 2009
    November 2009
    October 2009
    September 2009
    August 2009
    July 2009
    June 2009
    May 2009
    April 2009
    March 2009
    February 2009
    January 2009
    December 2008
    November 2008
    October 2008
    September 2008
    August 2008
    July 2008
    June 2008
    May 2008
    April 2008
    March 2008
    February 2008
    January 2008
    December 2007
    November 2007
    October 2007
    September 2007
    August 2007
    July 2007
    June 2007
    May 2007
    April 2007
    March 2007
    February 2007
    January 2007
    December 2006
    November 2006
    October 2006
    September 2006
    August 2006
    July 2006
    June 2006
    May 2006
    April 2006
    March 2006
    February 2006
    January 2006
    December 2005
    April 2005
    March 2005
    February 2005
    January 2005
    December 2004
    November 2004
    October 2004

    Blog*Spot Archives
    November 2005
    October 2005
    September 2005
    August 2005
    July 2005
    June 2005
    May 2005


    RSS Feed 2.0
    Comments RSS 2.0


    * Number of Chicago heroin overdoses hits 74 in 3 days
    * Car crashes into northern Illinois church, injuring 6
    * University of Illinois opens center for wounded veterans
    * Opponents upset Chief Illiniwek merchandise available online
    * Chicago man charged in 20-month-old's death acquitted
    * Health officials in Lake County encourage flu shots
    * Alleged improprieties force out 2 parole board members
    * Suburban officer accused of using excessive force sentenced
    * Illinois tax break deals yield uncertain results for state
    * Rauner: Illinois budget standoff 'could go on for a while'

    * Weaver tapped to replace LaHood in Illinois Senate
    * Budget impasse cuts services for domestic abuse victims
    * Illinois budget impasse affecting emergency call systems
    * Legal marijuana stirs hope in southern Illinois town
    * Statehouse Insider: We have a problem. Is anyone there?
    * AP Exclusive: Legal marijuana stirs hope in southern Illinois town
    * Gov. Rauner: Illinois budget standoff 'could go on for a while'
    * State revenues down by nearly $1 billion in first quarter
    * Former Gov. Quinn makes speech in Champaign, says he has no plans to run for office
    * Supporters of sexual assault, domestic violence programs warn of cuts due to budget impasse

    * Property tax hike adds up to 'a lot of hot dogs'
    * This tech company is 'ugly and boring'—and booming
    * South Side hospital may reverse years of losses
    * Big boys to change Chicago's skyline
    * Big blunders by Rauner, Madigan leading to Springfield stalemate

    * Franciscan women take final vows at West Side mission
    * Man charged with exposing himself on Green Line held on $150K bail
    * Girl, 14, boy, 14, shot in separate shootings in West Englewood, Bridgeport
    * Officials: Man dead, woman wounded during police-involved shooting
    * If driving has peaked in major cities, what's next?
    * No bail for West Side man accused in August slaying
    * Police: Murder charges filed from September weekend shooting
    * Chicago priest removed for inappropriate adult relationship
    * Firefighters respond to vacant Lawndale warehouse fire

    * Weaver tapped to replace LaHood in Illinois Senate
    * Budget impasse cuts services for domestic abuse victims
    * Illinois budget impasse affecting emergency call systems
    * Legal marijuana stirs hope in southern Illinois town
    * Bernard Schoenburg: An added loss for workers at Illinois State Museum
    * Angie Muhs: Comics, the 'Power of the Press' and more
    * Bernard Schoenburg: An added loss for workers at Illinois State Museum
    * Statehouse Insider: We have a problem. Is anyone there?
    * Statehouse Insider: We have a problem. Is anyone there?
    * Jim Bordeaux-White: Help give lung cancer patients hope for a cure

    * Vet Med Open House
    * Look back: Highlights from Melissa Merli on the week that was
    * Tom Kacich: Could Springfield atmosphere affect selection of auditor general?
    * Look ahead: Top picks from Melissa Merli for the week to come
    * Ask 'Mimi,' Oct. 4, 2015
    * 'Ungifted' is nothing short of genius
    * Mike Pemberton/Voices: Newspaper, coffee and the way of the world in a hotel lobby
    * C-U haiku, Oct. 4, 2015
    * Esther Cepeda: Spare the talk of an 'Asian invasion'
    * John Frayne: Gunns mixed it up in an intimate setting

    * Rozner: Chicago Bears find victory, reason to believe
    * Historic South Carolina floods: Heavy rain, hundreds rescued
    * Cutler, Gould give Chicago Bears something to celebrate
    * Cubs' manager Maddon enjoys one-start-fits-all day
    * Davis hits 2 HRs as Orioles beat Yankees 9-4 in finale

    * House lawmakers overcome hurdle on key tra...
    * Rodney Davis talks funding with Bloomingto...
    * The agency that fought Illiana gets a new ...
    * Rep. Dold takes educational cruise down Ch...
    * Lawmakers decry high turnover rate of VA h...
    * CBD Oil, and politics
    * Simon considering state Senate bid
    * Killer Congressman Tom MacArthur trying to...
    * Shutdown? State may not notice
    * Rep. Bob Dold

    * Judiciary Committee Reaches Agreement on P......
    * Senators Introduce Landmark Bipartisan Sen......

    * Kirk's VA bill fails to move ahead in Sena......

    * Cubs fans will celebrate, but maybe we ought to root, root, root for the Pirates
    * McHenry Community High School teachers are out.
    * We drove to McHenry this Sunday to support striking teachers in District 156.
    * Party, and Decorate, and Trick-or-Treat, All In Sheridan Park on Halloween
    * Hebru Brantley Mural Completed On Broadway
    * East St. Louis teachers walk out.
    * Sunday posts, pics and tweets.
    * Meet Uptown's "Gangsters and Ghosts" On October 29th
    * You’re Invited – Illinois REbarcamp Powered by YPN!
    * Next 10 general admission registrants for Vertex 15 Conference get extras

      Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller