SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      Mobile Version     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact
CapitolFax.com
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
Pension lawsuit roundup

Wednesday, Jan 29, 2014

* Tribune

The union coalition also contends the pension law is a violation of the state constitution’s contracts clause and breaches another constitutional provision — the so-called takings clause — which prevents a person’s private property from being taken away for public use without “just compensation.”

As part of the “takings” argument, the unions raise the issue of the legal theory of consideration. They counter that provisions in the new law that reduce the current employee contributions to their pensions by 1 percentage point and allow pension systems to file suit to ensure state government pays its proper share for retirement are inadequate and were never agreed upon.

The lawsuit alleged the changes foisted upon public employees are “substantial and will grow in magnitude over the course” a person’s retirement, a point that underscores why the new law is “unconstitutional and unfair.”

By way of example, the lawsuit highlighted the cases of 25 active and retired government workers. One was Chicagoan Lee Ayers, who has worked about 25 years as a clinical lab technician at a state university and expects to get an initial pension of $53,366 when he retires in 2019. Under the new law, he would lose more than $218,000 if he spends 25 years in retirement, the lawsuit contended.

In contrast, the new law lowers the regular pension deduction from his paycheck by 1 percentage point. That means he’d get to keep an extra $3,733 before he retires — a major difference from what he’d give up, according to the court papers.

* Lee Newspapers

The 55-page suit notes the plaintiffs have “faithfully” contributed to their pension systems during their tenure with the state.

“Unfortunately, the same cannot be said of the state,” the lawsuit notes. “The state chose to forgo funding its pension systems in amounts the state now claims were needed to fully meet the state’s annuity obligations. Now, the state expects the members of those systems to carry on their backs the burden of curing the state’s longstanding misconduct.”

“Misconduct” is a pretty harsh word.

* WBEZ

Tuesday’s lawsuit comes on the heels of other similar lawsuits that the Illinois Attorney General’s office has asked be consolidated into one case to be heard in Cook County. But the We Are One Illinois coalition filed its case in Sangamon County, home to Springfield, the state Capitol, and thousands of public workers.

The difference in location could prove significant in the outcome of the case. House Speaker Michael Madigan takes credit for negotiating the compromise and putting the needed votes on the bill for approval. Critics of the law express concerns about whether the suit could come before a Cook County judge who has connections to Madigan, who also serves as the chairman of the state’s Democratic Party.

The case is expected to eventually be argued in front of the Illinois State Supreme Court.

* Bloomberg

The case was assigned to Sangamon County Circuit Judge Peter C. Cavanagh, according to the court’s electronic docket. Running unopposed as a Republican, Cavanagh was elected to a six-year term in 2010, according to Sangamon County voting records.

* ABC7

Legal experts agree the case filed Tuesday in a Sangamon County Circuit Court will eventually find its way to the Illinois Supreme Court. The litigation certainly will take months, perhaps more than a year.

* Crain’s

“This landmark law was urgently needed to resolve the state’s $100 billion pension crisis,” said Mr. Quinn in a statement. “We expect it to be upheld as constitutional.”

Said a spokeswoman for Senate GOP Leader GOP Christine Radogno, “We are hopeful the court will move expeditiously so that we can stabilize the systems for the participants and save taxpayers.” Though unions are unhappy, the law will cut taxpayer payments more than 40 percent over the next three decades, she added.

And from Mr. Cullerton: “I supported (the law) to break the political impasse between the Senate and House, (and) to send a test case to the courts.”

* Sun-Times

By contrast, Rutherford is not a believer in the law that passed the House and Senate and that Quinn enacted into law. In a brief interview Tuesday, the treasurer said he believes it’s unconstitutional and that pension reform of any sort should be negotiated with the unions.

“We anticipated this latest lawsuit by the We Are One Illinois coalition regarding the new pension law,” Rutherford said in a prepared statement. “We will now wait and see how the Supreme Court rules.”

- Posted by Rich Miller        


51 Comments
  1. - OneMan - Wednesday, Jan 29, 14 @ 10:55 am:

    It reminds me a bit of the old Letterman catchphrase they would use after some bits…

    “Oh no! … We’re gonna get sued.”

    Who didn’t see this coming, also I think Misconduct might be right word at least it sounds better than lazy stupidity…


  2. - SIUPROF - Wednesday, Jan 29, 14 @ 11:05 am:

    A question about how the stay requested operates. If a stay is granted, the effective date of the law is put off–until resolution of the issue in the courts. If the court ultimately finds the law (or parts of it) is in fact constitutional–when does the law go in effect–the date of the court’s ruling–or a date specified by the court. In other words, will there be a period of time that will allow someone to get out after the court’s decision before the law becomes effective?


  3. - Joan P. - Wednesday, Jan 29, 14 @ 11:16 am:

    ‘ “Misconduct” is a pretty harsh word.” ‘

    It may be harsh, but it’s not inaccurate.


  4. - Marie - Wednesday, Jan 29, 14 @ 11:22 am:

    Why do they call it pension reform - reform would be to correct a fault - that would mean the legislature paying what it should when it should and what is owed. What they want is pension restructure or reduction


  5. - PublicServant - Wednesday, Jan 29, 14 @ 11:30 am:

    The lawsuit also asks for what looks like punitive damages in requesting “such additional relief as is just and equitable”.


  6. - Ghost - Wednesday, Jan 29, 14 @ 11:37 am:

    === will cut taxpayer payments more than 40 percent over the next three decades====

    we can cut taxpayer payments 100% if the State just declines to pay any of its creditors, and seizes what it needs. If the justification is taxpayer savings then lets expand the the bills we are not going to pay.

    Mel Brooks/madigan…. its good to be the king….


  7. - Lobo Y Olla - Wednesday, Jan 29, 14 @ 11:38 am:

    ““Misconduct” is a pretty harsh word.”

    I’ve said that for years. When an attorney makes an error, it’s unilaterally termed “misconduct.” I think “mistake’ is more apt. Misconduct happens, mistakes are much more common, however.


  8. - Rob Roy - Wednesday, Jan 29, 14 @ 11:38 am:

    I would say that misconduct is not harsh enough, criminal comes to mind. They took the pension holidays not the retirees. If a private company did to there pension funds what the State/ law makers have done jail time would be in there future.


  9. - Diogenes in DuPage - Wednesday, Jan 29, 14 @ 11:39 am:

    re –misconduct –
    Back in the day, when my father-in-law was a treasurer for a private company, if he had diverted employer pension payments to cover other company bills, he would have gone to prison. Just saying’ …


  10. - One of the 35 - Wednesday, Jan 29, 14 @ 11:45 am:

    If you don’t like the word misconduct”, then how about “breach of fiduciary responsibility”? (for failure to provide funding)The GA made repeated willful choices over the years to fund other projects and operations, to the detriment of the pension system.


  11. - Jack Handy - Wednesday, Jan 29, 14 @ 11:46 am:

    Couple legal questions. Legally, what’s the difference between a contract and a contractual relationship.

    Also, what does the term “impair” mean in a legal sense? How would one impair a benefit?


  12. - Anyone Remember - Wednesday, Jan 29, 14 @ 11:50 am:

    One of the 35

    Don’t forget that usually the General Assembly appropriated what the Governor requested. How sad is it that of the pre-Quinn governors the only one to pay what was required when he took office and didn’t change the law / underfund the pension payments was George Ryan?


  13. - wordslinger - Wednesday, Jan 29, 14 @ 11:52 am:

    –Back in the day, when my father-in-law was a treasurer for a private company, if he had diverted employer pension payments to cover other company bills, he would have gone to prison. Just saying’ … –

    Plenty of private sector corporations stiffed their stiffed their pension plans for years then shed liabilities in bankruptcy court. Who went to prison?


  14. - Ghost - Wednesday, Jan 29, 14 @ 11:53 am:

    Jack Handy, when they froze judges cost of living increases, the judges said that impaired their salaries and was unconsitutional.

    I guess the freeze should have said it would save taxpayers money and was under the States police powers to violate its constitution and then it would have been upheld….


  15. - Soccertease - Wednesday, Jan 29, 14 @ 11:53 am:

    The 1% reduction in employee contributions does not apply to retirees. So what is retirees consideration? The right to sue? What a joke. I do agree with RR that misconduct is not strong enough and the intentional decisions by the legislature to ignore the constitution is a criminal act.


  16. - Anon - Wednesday, Jan 29, 14 @ 12:15 pm:

    If and when the ISC strikes down part or all of this law, will any of those who voted for it really be surprised?


  17. - Cook County Commoner - Wednesday, Jan 29, 14 @ 12:20 pm:

    So far, all anybody has to kick around is the plaintiffs’ allegations in the several pending pension related law suits. When the defendants answer and raise their issues, I suspect some folks will get a real education on contract law. Assuming the defendants vigorously defend these cases on behalf of the citizens (and I have some doubts there along with the impartiality of state court judges), the law of reformation of contracts will surprise many people.


  18. - Chicago Publius - Wednesday, Jan 29, 14 @ 12:31 pm:

    “Misconduct” is an apt word in this case.

    A well-established principle of contract law is that the parties to a contract must comply with what is known as the “covenant of good faith and fair dealing.” When you and I enter into a contract, I can’t then engage in conduct that would undermine the contract itself. State leaders made a promise in the Pension code and re-iterated that promise year after year when they did nothing to revise that promise), and for this reason, the State is clearly a party to the pension contract. Undermining that promise is the precise sort of “misconduct” that contract law prevents.

    To phrase this another way: The implied covenant requires that parties to a contract use good faith and fair dealing in the performance of the contract. More specifically, “[t]he doctrine of good faith. . . requires the party vested with contractual discretion to exercise that discretion reasonably and with proper motive, not arbitrarily, capriciously, or in a manner inconsistent with the reasonable expectations of the parties.” Bass v. Innovative Consultants, Inc., 328 Ill. App. 3d 492 (1st Dist. 2002).


  19. - Norseman - Wednesday, Jan 29, 14 @ 12:35 pm:

    Do we prefer misfeasance or malfeasance?


  20. - Tom Joad - Wednesday, Jan 29, 14 @ 12:38 pm:

    Does anyone think that the unions had a say in how much money went into pensions for their members and how much went into salaries? If not, you don’t know how unions and the legislature work.


  21. - Hit or Miss - Wednesday, Jan 29, 14 @ 12:39 pm:

    A stay of the law has been requested. If a stay is granted and if the case is not finally decided for many months or even years, what will the impact be of the budget process? Are we looking at tax increases or spending cuts or both until the court cases play out? Am I also correct in saying that a stay of the implementation of the pension reform bill will increase multi-billion dollar general fund deficit currently listed by the Governor’s Office of Management & Budget for FY15-FY17?


  22. - PublicServant - Wednesday, Jan 29, 14 @ 12:42 pm:

    @Tom Joad - Care to back that allegation up with some facts bud? Or are you just doing a right wing drive by?


  23. - Irish - Wednesday, Jan 29, 14 @ 12:46 pm:

    I have the same question as SIUPROF - @ 11:05 am.
    Will this be up to the courts? Or is there a standard that if s stay is granted that the effective date of the law will not be the original date but the date the final decision is made?


  24. - Brendan - Wednesday, Jan 29, 14 @ 12:52 pm:

    If they’re trying to utilize the takings clause, then a plausible rationale could be made that the “just compensation” they receive is the survival/improved health of the pension system. There’s a huge difference between compensation being equitable vs. equivalent.


  25. - Old and in the Way - Wednesday, Jan 29, 14 @ 12:52 pm:

    Cook County Commoner
    To your point. Contract reformation is a type of equitable remedy wherein the contract is rewritten in a way that better expresses the intentions of the parties. For example, sometimes a breach of contract may occur because the parties were mistaken as to one of the contract terms, such as the delivery date or the definition of a word in the contract. In such cases, the contract may then be rewritten or “reformed” in order to remedy the breach. However, a contract cannot be “reformed” if it is either unfair or damages either party. One party cannot gain advantage at the expense of the other. Reforming the “pension contract” would appear to be a non starter given this caveat.


  26. - Skirmisher - Wednesday, Jan 29, 14 @ 12:54 pm:

    I wouldn’t say that “misconduct” is especially harsh when “malfeasance” is more accurate.


  27. - Chicago Publius - Wednesday, Jan 29, 14 @ 12:55 pm:

    The We Are One Complaint is very well crafted in terms of challenging pension-reform under both the pension clause and the “takings” clause of state/federal constitutions — far better than the complaints filed in the other lawsuits.

    However, it is disappointing that the We Are One Complaint doesn’t challenge the pension-reform legislation as violating constitutional prohibitions against “special legislation,” “bills of attainder,” and “equal protection.”

    For example, the Illinois Constitution specifically prohibits “special legislation” and the federal constitutional prohibits “bills of attainder” – that is, legislation that imposes a harm on a select group of people.

    Ordinarily, these prohibitions are analyzed under principles similar to those regarding “equal protection.” And under this analysis, the state of Illinois can’t discriminate against a select group of people (i.e., pensioners) unless (1) there is a reasonable basis for so doing (2) in the context of an acceptable public purpose.

    But think about this for a moment. . . . If the state enacted legislation to collect a gasoline surtax in Wilmette so that the state could pay for its highway bonds, people in Wilmette could easily demonstrate that the only reason they are being penalized is because they have extra money – and that would not be a rational reason for treating them differently from everyone else. You would get a similar outcome if the state enacted legislation under which it would pay ALL CREDITORS 72 cents on the dollar. Beyond issues presented by the constitutional prohibition against “contract impairment,” the creditors could argue that the only reason they are being discriminated against is because they are owed the money in the first place. And when presented with such an argument, a court could well conclude that this is not a rational reason for discriminating against a group of people. In this context, a court might well conclude that the State has available a range of other means to promote the alleged public purpose of finding some budgetary relief.

    Certainly, a similar argument could be presented in the case of pension reform: the only reason that pensioners are the victims of this special legislation is that they are owed money.

    The advantage of adding this type of challenge is that it gives the courts another (and far less vexing) means of over-turning this travesty known as pension reform. Through this approach, the courts could avoid an issue that no one really wants to address: under what conditions, if at all, is it acceptable for a state to impair a pension promise?


  28. - Old and in the Way - Wednesday, Jan 29, 14 @ 12:57 pm:

    Brendan
    Brush up on your contract law. No. The takings clause, as you call it, does not work that way. It must be equitable or preserve the status of the parties within the contract. The court has already held that the state must fund the pensions so they are not gaining anything they didn’t have before.


  29. - Anon. - Wednesday, Jan 29, 14 @ 1:09 pm:

    ==the law of reformation of contracts will surprise many people==

    Learning that there is a principle that says you can unilaterally “reform” a contract because you would rather spend the money you owe for services already performed on something else or that one party can declare what is adequate consideration for the other party to accept a reformation would certainly surprise me. I must have slept through that part of contracts class in law school.


  30. - Old and in the Way - Wednesday, Jan 29, 14 @ 1:13 pm:

    Chicago Publius
    An interesting possibility. Despite some initial hurdles there may be a case here. Still the initial hurdle would be the public good or purpose. I like it as a wedge argument in the case.


  31. - titan - Wednesday, Jan 29, 14 @ 1:20 pm:

    +++ PublicServant - Wednesday, Jan 29, 14 @ 11:30 am:
    The lawsuit also asks for what looks like punitive damages in requesting “such additional relief as is just and equitable”. +++

    No - that isn’t how one askes for punitive damages in a complaint. That is standardized ‘boilerplate’ language to other cover general relief that may turn out to be appropriate as the discovery and such unfolds and the court makes rulings along the way. If you want punitive damages, you ask for them explicitly.


  32. - Rube B Bumpkin - Wednesday, Jan 29, 14 @ 1:40 pm:

    Rube B Bumpkin here, and I live in a van down by the river in Pope county, so I would like to ask ifn it makes any difference a’tall whether they hear this in Sangamon or Cook county court? Thankee.


  33. - Anthony - Wednesday, Jan 29, 14 @ 2:12 pm:

    Not to mention it’s a violation of the U.S. Constitutions 14th amendment (equal protection under the law) because, they exempted the judges from the pension reform therefore, treating us differently. Isn’t that what the gays won their battles on not being treated equally? And their still winning on state by state rulings. It’s grounded on not treating people equally i.e. judges and us. I think the AMAC are the only group that’s filed under the 14th amendment violation.


  34. - RNUG - Wednesday, Jan 29, 14 @ 2:21 pm:

    Old and in the Way - Wednesday, Jan 29, 14 @ 12:57 pm:

    Technically, in the initial IFT case, didn’t the IL SC actually say the pensions had to paid when due but was silent on the actual method of funding / pre-funding (pension payment funds) said pension payments, leaving that to the General Assembly?

    PS: I’ll check back in late tonight


  35. - kimocat - Wednesday, Jan 29, 14 @ 2:53 pm:

    I keep wondering why it is rarely mentioned that the consistent underfunding and “pension holidays” were done DELIBERATELY in order to create the so-called crisis we have today. Most of the same players were there all along and they knew exactly what they were doing with each diversion of funding that should have gone to pensions and each ERI. If Madigan can willfully create his own constitutional crisis with his very actions, how is there any constitutional protection for any of us. It would seem he simply makes a mockery of the entire system.


  36. - Old and in the Way - Wednesday, Jan 29, 14 @ 3:01 pm:

    RNUG
    You are correct. A “promise” that you will pay is in fact no new consideration. Nor is a statuary funding level guarantee. The pensioners already have that right as affirmed by the courts. Besides the GA left room open to change their mind should the “need arise.”


  37. - Norseman - Wednesday, Jan 29, 14 @ 3:04 pm:

    kimocat - Take a deep breath and count to 10. We’re all upset - to put it politely, but we need to keep it rationale. The underfunding was to enable them to spend money on other things. It was not to deliberately create crisis.


  38. - Anonymous - Wednesday, Jan 29, 14 @ 3:07 pm:

    By the time Court rules that the pension reform law is unconstitutional, the election will be over. The bill will have served its real purpose. It got the politicians reelected.


  39. - Chicago Publius - Wednesday, Jan 29, 14 @ 3:16 pm:

    Old and in the way at 3:01 is correct. A promise that I really really really will do what I already promised to do cannot be deemed “consideration” for purposes of reforming a contract — especially if there is no mutual agreement.

    And RNUG at 2:21: Yes, in the McNamee case, the IL Supreme Court said that pensioners do not have a right to a well-funded pension fund — only a right to the pension benefit. Effectively, the state, through its courts, told pensioners: don’t worry - you’re pension is secure. And that fact is another one that should have been pleaded, to show malfeasance on the part of the state.


  40. - facts are stubborn things - Wednesday, Jan 29, 14 @ 3:18 pm:

    @Anonymous - Wednesday, Jan 29, 14 @ 3:07 pm:

    =By the time Court rules that the pension reform law is unconstitutional, the election will be over. The bill will have served its real purpose. It got the politicians reelected.=

    Could not agree more! That is what this is all about — a political solution trying to solve a legal and moral issue. Eventualy I beleive the answers of how do you politicaly fix the pensions and how do you moraly and legaly do it will become one. This is all that process playing out.


  41. - kimocat - Wednesday, Jan 29, 14 @ 3:29 pm:

    I understand your point norseman, but I do know MJM and I simply will not believe that this was not in the back of his mind for some time now.


  42. - sad - Wednesday, Jan 29, 14 @ 3:41 pm:

    public pensioners and employees urged state leaders to contribute their share to pensions and even went to court to get relief. state political and judicial leaders said ‘don’t worry, your pension is secure.’ all of this sets up m marvelous case of pension impairment, contract impairment, and promissory estoppel.


  43. - Steve - Wednesday, Jan 29, 14 @ 3:59 pm:

    ‘Misconduct’ isn’t too harsh of a word. Actually, it’s way too light. Any company (in the S&P 500) who’s financial officers didn’t properly fund their pensions would have the pension plans shut down. Mike Madigan should look in the mirror: he more than any individual is responsible for the financial mess Illinois is in pension wise. Whether you agree with the unions or not is irrelevant. The pensions weren’t funded properly , someone deserves to be in prison for this. Actually , this is mail and wire fraud for sending out checks when a pension plan is massive underfunded. ‘Misconduct’ isn’t the best word. A better phrase is RICO.


  44. - Anonymous - Wednesday, Jan 29, 14 @ 4:16 pm:

    “And that fact is another one that should have been pleaded, to show malfeasance on the part of the state.” Malfeasance or misconduct are legally irrelevant. It violates the constitution to diminish or impair a pension benefit no matter how good or bad the intent or the management of the pension fund. Lots of comments here baiting on red herrings and losing sight of exactly what the court will be called upon to determine.


  45. - walker - Wednesday, Jan 29, 14 @ 5:09 pm:

    Steve, Rob Roy, and others, who claim that if anything like this happened in the private sector, someone would go to jail — are completely wrong.

    What happened in the private sector to hundreds of pension programs, from the 1980’s onward, make the Illinois Legislature look like saints.

    One CFO, of a Fortune 100 company, who figured out a way to drive his employees’ pension program into bankruptcy, and then pass off the remaining liability to the Federal government (i.e. taxpayers), was then honored by Fortune Magazine as “CFO of the Year”.

    The reason this is important, is that much of the precedent on the ability, under certain conditions, to break the “contract” which is a pension, has already been argued (and mostly won) in the private sector. There have probably been dozens of cases on the issue of the absolute enforceability of this kind of “contract”.

    That is why I believe the key legal arguments will be more about the “enforceable contract” language, than about the “shall not be diminished”. Also why I keep thinking this isn’t a “slam dunk” case, like some would have it.

    Not a lawyer, just someone whose pension was taken away back in the heyday of such takings in the private sector.

    One of the many reasons I so hate the phrase “let’s run government like a business.”


  46. - Fed up and retired - Wednesday, Jan 29, 14 @ 5:17 pm:

    Private sector pensions don’t have Constitutional protections not to diminish them and also not to pass ex post facto laws which impair contractual obligations. The State is also not allowed to take property without compensation. What we are taking about with “reform” is exactly what the State is prohibited from doing. Also didn’t some Enron officials go to prison?


  47. - archimedes - Wednesday, Jan 29, 14 @ 5:34 pm:

    Some of the comparisons to private pension systems depends on if the impairment/diminshment to the private pension was before or after ERISA.

    Prior to ERISA, companies could underfund pensions and generally set up a pension crisis.

    Since ERISA, companies must fund pensions and private pensions can be frozen - but the anti-cutback rule would never allow a reduction to already earned pension benefits.

    SB1 reduces earned benefits as well as future benefits not yet earned.


  48. - DuPage Dave - Wednesday, Jan 29, 14 @ 6:46 pm:

    I wish politicians like Rutherford and others interested in government would read the state constitution. Article III Section 5 makes a contractual commitment between the pension system and its members. Membership has nothing to do with membership in a union. Non-union state workers like me stand equal with union workers in terms of membership in the state pension system.

    Importantly though, the union cannot negotiate for me or on my behalf because the contract is between the state and me, not between the state and a union or the state and any group of people.

    The relevant section reads: “Membership in any pension or retirement system of the State, any unit of local government or school district, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, shall be an enforceable contractual relationship, the benefits of which shall not be diminished or impaired.”

    Nothing in that sentence implies that a union or anyone else can negotiate a diminishment or impairment of the benefits I have earned as a member of the state pension system. The contract is with me, not them.

    I am confident that the State Supreme Court will toss the recently-passed legislation out as unconstitutional. I’m very happy to see the lawsuits coming forward which take my interests at heart.

    I have been surprised and disappointed at the number of state legislators (including my own) who feel that a bit of diminishing here and a little impairing there aren’t so bad after all. They go on tv and tell us that the plain English language of the constitution does not mean what it says. It’s truly disgusting.


  49. - Justan Observer - Wednesday, Jan 29, 14 @ 9:02 pm:

    Well, we all know the new pension legislation is Unconstitutional, in both the spirit of the law, and in the letter of the law. What is going to be fun is watching how the Supremes try their best to claim otherwise.


  50. - Justan Observer - Wednesday, Jan 29, 14 @ 9:10 pm:

    DuPage Dave — everything you said regarding the unconstitutionality - and the polictics — is true. And , accurate. However, you also said this — “I am confident that the State Supreme Court will toss the recently-passed legislation out as unconstitutional.” - I am not at all so confidant. I have seen previous cases where judges in this state bent over backwards to make judgments that are ridiculously and obviously incorrect, merely because of politics. Sad. But, true. I guess I am just more jaded…


  51. - Springfield Steve - Thursday, Jan 30, 14 @ 7:12 am:

    Dupage Dave said “…tell us that the plain English language of the constitution does not mean what it says.”

    Reminds me of Bill Clinton saying “…depends on what the definition of ‘is’ is.”

    Those politicians will twist anything…


Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.


* Reader comments closed for the weekend
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Another network TV buy
* Davis ad responds to Callis ad
* Question of the day
* *** UPDATED x1 - Appears to be successfully rehabilitated *** The downward spiral rages on
* Town moving forward with plans to privatize fire department
* DCFS changes policy on "unsafe sleep deaths"
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Network TV ad buys
* *** UPDATED x1 - Great bio, but dumped *** Rauner campaign employed embattled security firm
* Finally, some good news
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Thursday cable TV buys
* A couple of reasonable ideas
* *** UPDATED x1 - Schilling response *** Bustos launches new ad highlighting constituent service
* Vampire capitalism or unlocking value?
* RI sheriff resigns after "attempted cyberstalking"
* Dodging and weaving and proclaiming his innocence
* *** UPDATED x1 - Video *** Despite sharp disagreements, NFIB backs Rauner
* Kirk raising money on "rumors" of Michelle Obama candidacy
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Supplement to today’s edition, crosstabs and new TV ads
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today's edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)
* Yesterday's blog posts

Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...

...............

...............


Search This Blog...

Search the 98th General Assembly By Bill Number
(example: HB0001)

Search the 98th General Assembly By Keyword

          
        * Nokia 130: now available in a store near you
        * OPPO N3 leaked photos reveal an even stranger camera
        * New Motorola products for pre-order starting September 16
        * India’s Spice set to unveil first Android One phone
        * Want lithium-ion batteries to last? Slow charging may not be the answer
        * Our 5 favourite new Windows Phone apps of the week
        * Smartwatches: smart first or watch first?

        * 4 Ways to Use Social Media in Public Relations
        * Eclipse Magnifier Workbench Lamp
        * Google launches Android One phones with Micromax, Karbonn and Spice Mobiles in India for Rs. 6,399
        * First Android One Smartphones Announced In India
        * New Vizzywig 4K Ultra HD iOS App Priced At $1,000 In iTunes App Store
        * Oppo N3 Press Photos Leaked
        * Shuttle XH81 Core i7 Haswell Mini PCs Unveiled (video)

        * Twins 6, White Sox 4: Sweep hopes evaporate early
        * Danks looks to finish rough second half on high note vs. Royals
        * Abreu ties White Sox rookie home run record
        * White Sox fall to Twins, all but out of playoff race
        * Abreu ties White Sox rookie home run record in loss
        * Kazanas honored with Roland Hemond Award
        * White Sox lose challenge at first base


        Main Menu
        Home
        Illinois
        YouTube
        Pundit rankings
        Obama
        Subscriber Content
        Durbin
        Burris
        Blagojevich Trial
        Advertising
        Updated Posts
        Polls

        Archives
        September 2014
        August 2014
        July 2014
        June 2014
        May 2014
        April 2014
        March 2014
        February 2014
        January 2014
        December 2013
        November 2013
        October 2013
        September 2013
        August 2013
        July 2013
        June 2013
        May 2013
        April 2013
        March 2013
        February 2013
        January 2013
        December 2012
        November 2012
        October 2012
        September 2012
        August 2012
        July 2012
        June 2012
        May 2012
        April 2012
        March 2012
        February 2012
        January 2012
        December 2011
        November 2011
        October 2011
        September 2011
        August 2011
        July 2011
        June 2011
        May 2011
        April 2011
        March 2011
        February 2011
        January 2011
        December 2010
        November 2010
        October 2010
        September 2010
        August 2010
        July 2010
        June 2010
        May 2010
        April 2010
        March 2010
        February 2010
        January 2010
        December 2009
        November 2009
        October 2009
        September 2009
        August 2009
        July 2009
        June 2009
        May 2009
        April 2009
        March 2009
        February 2009
        January 2009
        December 2008
        November 2008
        October 2008
        September 2008
        August 2008
        July 2008
        June 2008
        May 2008
        April 2008
        March 2008
        February 2008
        January 2008
        December 2007
        November 2007
        October 2007
        September 2007
        August 2007
        July 2007
        June 2007
        May 2007
        April 2007
        March 2007
        February 2007
        January 2007
        December 2006
        November 2006
        October 2006
        September 2006
        August 2006
        July 2006
        June 2006
        May 2006
        April 2006
        March 2006
        February 2006
        January 2006
        December 2005
        April 2005
        March 2005
        February 2005
        January 2005
        December 2004
        November 2004
        October 2004

        Blog*Spot Archives
        November 2005
        October 2005
        September 2005
        August 2005
        July 2005
        June 2005
        May 2005

        Syndication

        RSS Feed 2.0
        Comments RSS 2.0
        WordPress

        Loading


        * The Week That Was: Unseasonable Cold, Mayor’s R.....
        * Rauner's schools plan raises eyebrows..
        * Chicago minimum wage change in order for October..
        * Governor declares Rail Safety Week Sept. 14-20..
        * Emirates Touches Down in Chicago Airline commen.....


        * Highland teachers reject contract offer
        * Closer Look: Rauner's schools plan raises eyebrows
        * Voter rolls issues reported in southwest Illinois
        * 2 Chicago area schools named for Obama family
        * Decatur police chief retires after 28 years
        * International students help boost SIU enrollment
        * Congressional candidate's residency under scrutiny
        * Cop and suspect injured in shooting, incident
        * Leaders expected at Mexican Independence parade
        * CPS to lay off 476 custodians by month's end

        * Rauner’s education plan raises eyebrows
        * Governor’s race a tale of business climates
        * Medical marijuana law sponsor defends secret bids
        * Fired IDOT workers sue, say they are ‘political cover’ for Quinn
        * Illinois still employs 173 'improper' state hires
        * Fired IDOT workers sue, say they are 'political cover' for Quinn
        * State lawmakers propose surcharge to pay for police body cameras
        * Surcharge sought for police cameras
        * Illinois lawmakers want new surcharge to pay for police body cameras
        * Rauner: Quinn should order no contact with former chief of staff

        * Three real estate companies, but only one bound for an IPO
        * The upstart that hopes to beat Morningstar — again
        * State steps up litigation to take land for Peotone airport
        * State vacancies increase wait for professional licenses
        * Why is it so hard to be a boutique owner in Chicago?


        * It shouldn’t take a government photo ID to exercise one’s right to vote
        * T. rex Sue — still our queen
        * 94-year-old jailhouse lawyer reflects on life of crime
        * No bail for teen accused of sexually assaulting CSU student
        * Mexican Independence Day parade attracts plenty of pols
        * Cops shoot driver who rammed into police car, injured officer
        * No-homework policy improves home life for younger students at one CPS school
        * Candid camera time with Rahm on the Brown Line
        * 2 city sites to be cut from Obama library list; U. of C. bid lives
        * Despite tough talk, curfew citations plummet under Emanuel’s watch


        * Woman slain, boy shot during Sunday attacks
        * Rahm's Readers exceed goal: 2.7 million books read
        * Autopsy: Man, 20, killed in Sauk Village
        * 1 dead, several injured on South, West sides
        * Prosecutors: Chicago man sexually assaulted 2 children ages 5, 6
        * No bail for teen charged in Roseland sex assault
        * Body found in Sherman Park Lagoon
        * Cops: Man dies after shooting at River Oaks mall
        * Nearly 480 janitors who work in CPS schools to be laid off
        * Car crashes through DuPage 7-Eleven, man charged


        * Fired IDOT Workers Sue Quinn Administration
        * Inspector's Report Reveals Clout Hiring At IDOT
        * Listen to State Week - September 12, 2014
        * American Show: The Best Music You've Never Heard
        * The Best Music You've Never Heard
        * Officer's death highlights need for trauma center in Northwest Indiana
        * Lawsuit: Man beaten in Cook County jail more than 10 hours after judge ordered his release
        * Candid Camera For Cops
        * Plan Would Give Police Cameras, Raise Fines
        * Ousted commander leaves trail of costly lawsuits


        * Rauner’s education plan raises eyebrows
        * Our Opinion: It’s time to get serious about sewers in Springfield
        * Bernard Schoenburg: Be careful when they talk of property taxes
        * Charles Krauthammer: Obama’s uncertain trumpet, again
        * Governor’s race a tale of business climates
        * Statehouse Insider: Christie should feel at home in Illinois
        * Susan Koch: Examples of excellence showcased in honors program
        * Medical marijuana law sponsor defends secret bids
        * Clarissa Williams: Friend-in-Deed campaign kicks off for 2014
        * Fired IDOT workers sue, say they are ‘political cover’ for Quinn


        * Business Calendar
        * People in Business
        * Deputy Postmaster General says postal service strives to delivery
        * Belleville restaurant has new owner
        * Game makes meal time family time
        * Douglas-Hart Nature Center takes part in monarch tagging
        * McDonald’s rolling out free coffee event
        * City to fine-tune dock development
        * Millennial nation
        * Police reports


        * Miss America 2015
        * Bears turn things around in a hurry
        * Injuries to key Bears keep piling up
        * Imrem: Just like that, all is well for Bears
        * Packers beat Jets 31-24

        * FAA Rejects Call For New O'Hare Noise Stud...
        * Representatives Quigley, Duckworth, Schako...
        * Representative Jan Schakowsky Statement in...
        * Representative Jan Schakowsky Statement on...
        * Representative Jan Schakowsky Statement on...
        * Rep. Jan Schakowsky discounts threat from ...
        * Representative Jan Schakowsky Statement on...
        * Schakowsky backs striking workers at Juno ...
        * U.S. Rep. Schakowsky Gearing Up For Novemb...
        * Representative Jan Schakowsky: On This Lab...

        * Candidates Attend Democrat Fry...
        * Candidates Attend Democrat Fry...
        * Candidates Attend Democrat Fry...
        * Candidates Attend Democrat Fry...
        * Candidates Attend Democrat Fry...

        * Sen. Kirk statement on ISIS's Killing of t......
        * Rumors: Michelle Obama to Run for Senate i......

        * Outlaw Rahm must go. He tells retirees to drop dead.
        * Any public employee who votes for Rahm Emanuel is cutting their own throat.
        * Rahm announces his Give-Every-Classroom-A-Pet program.
        * Hinsdale’s Richard Skoda will do anything except bargain a contract. The Facebook Axe redux.
        * Glen Brown. Beware of shifting the normal cost of pensions to the local school districts.
        * Sunday reads.
        * People have the power.
        * Mother Jones. Some day the workers will take possession of your city hall. And when we do, no child will be sacrificed on the altar of profit.
        * Hinsdale District 86. No scabs for Skoda.
        * Ex-Redflex CEO Pleads Not Guilty In Bribery Scandal


        * Sun-Times Report: In Illegal Hiring Scandal, Pat Quinn Protects “Kingmaker” Kin
        * Governor Quinn Announces Clean Water Investments in Stickney and Burbank - Projects Will Modernize Infrastructure, Combat Damaging Floods and Create Jobs
        * Governor Quinn Honors “Latinos Building Illinois” - Thompson Center Exhibit Showcases Trailblazers For Latino Heritage Month
        * Rauner Campaign Response to Quinn IDOT Confession
        * Rauner: Quinn refuses to cooperate with investigations




            Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller