SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      Mobile Version     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact
CapitolFax.com
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
*** UPDATED x1 *** The Rutherford plot thickens

Monday, Feb 3, 2014

* Sun-Times

The Illinois State Treasurer employee behind allegations against State Treasurer Dan Rutherford resigned from his position Monday, the employee told the Sun-Times.

The man, who asked that his name not yet be used, said he submitted his resignation letter Monday following what he called an “intimidating” news conference held by Rutherford on Friday, with a former FBI agent at his side. […]

The employee told the Sun-Times in an interview Monday that his complaint entailed harassment claims and pressure to do political work.

Apparently, the employee took compensatory time, so his resignation doesn’t become official until Feb. 10, meaning the treasurer’s office can’t yet comment.

*** UPDATE *** WUIS

A man who says he was a victim of sexual harassment by Treasurer Dan Rutherford has submitted a letter of resignation. […]

The alleged victim describes unwanted advances by Treasurer Rutherford, and accuses him of trying to force state employees to work on behalf of his campaign for governor.

Oy.

We are all really in for it now.

- Posted by Rich Miller        


62 Comments
  1. - Oswego Willy - Monday, Feb 3, 14 @ 5:06 pm:

    Longest 8 days for Dan Rutherford’s campaign.

    Kinda boxed both the political and governmental.

    “Intimidating”. Ugliness at every turn.


  2. - All is fair - Monday, Feb 3, 14 @ 5:16 pm:

    how does the effective date affect the time when they can comment. Is that what they’re saying? I would think it to be irrelevant.


  3. - Anonymous - Monday, Feb 3, 14 @ 5:22 pm:

    Interesting. Don’t claimants usually hang out, daring their employer to fire or lay them off so that they can further substantiate their claim with a retaliatory discharge–or just hang around doing nothing, fully aware that their safe because the employer doesn’t want to be seen as retaliating?

    It’s a pretty effective strategy in Corporate American nowadays.


  4. - Demoralized - Monday, Feb 3, 14 @ 5:24 pm:

    ==how does the effective date affect the time when they can comment.==

    He’s an active employee still. You don’t comment on personnel matters.


  5. - Anonymous - Monday, Feb 3, 14 @ 5:28 pm:

    =It’s a pretty effective strategy in Corporate American nowadays. =

    I’ll add, explaining why it is that everyone who has not filed a sex, sex harassment, or national origin claim/suit or has not suddenly decided to run to the MD to get their knees fixed are laid off instead.


  6. - All is fair - Monday, Feb 3, 14 @ 5:29 pm:

    You just as typically don’t comment on personnel matters after people are fired. That’s why I’m wondering why they said this. Do we really believe that we’ll get more info in 8 days? I doubt it. Should have just said it’s a personnel issue. no comment.

    Which maybe is what they did say. That’s what I’m curious about


  7. - Soccermom - Monday, Feb 3, 14 @ 5:29 pm:

    Hey, if he’s saying he was forced to do political work, I don’t understand why his name is being kept secret. This is starting to smell.


  8. - Chad - Monday, Feb 3, 14 @ 5:31 pm:

    Rutherford is just too much of a Boy Scout to have knowingly had people doing politics on the payroll. He saw all the ugly stuff that happened with Tristano, so I doubt he would be so stupid. There are very simple legal standards to apply there, so if someone stepped over the line, no problem in resolving that pretty quickly. Being part of the vast uninformed, what is disturbing to me is that the ST seems to be enabling the impression of some kind of sex scandal. If the goods are not there, this should stop. A great newspaper does not do that.


  9. - Madge - Monday, Feb 3, 14 @ 5:33 pm:

    Rutherford is done as soon as the complaint is formally filed by the accuser. The details will put the Rutherford campaign in perma explainin’ mode until the final, humiliating numbers come in on the evening of March 18.


  10. - Anonymous - Monday, Feb 3, 14 @ 5:37 pm:

    =That’s why I’m wondering why they said this. =

    Well that part is pretty obvious, I think from the text that’s been provided. They are stating that the “claimant/plaintiff/whatever he is right now” was intimidated by Rutherford’s press conference which included the two “official-looking” gentlemen standing on either side of Mr. Rutherford–and I’d imagine that pains to which Mr. Rutherford went to explain their backgrounds.

    You can agree and/or disagree as to whether it’s heartfelt and/or a tactic, but I’d argue that it did seem quite unusual.


  11. - PoolGuy - Monday, Feb 3, 14 @ 5:43 pm:

    actually that FBI guy on the right kinda scared me too. and knowing he is about to be taken through the ringer, maybe another week or so to settle his nerves is needed.


  12. - PoolGuy - Monday, Feb 3, 14 @ 5:44 pm:

    *wringer


  13. - Anonymous - Monday, Feb 3, 14 @ 5:45 pm:

    =A great newspaper does not do that. =

    Perhaps your Mr. Rutherford should not have held such a bizarre press conference then. It seems that he’s the one who’s opened the door.


  14. - Capitol View - Monday, Feb 3, 14 @ 5:46 pm:

    every single politician gets this nonsense thrown at him. Jim Thompson got married as he campaigned for Governor or shortly after he won, but as a long term bachelor there were always whispers…


  15. - woodchuck - Monday, Feb 3, 14 @ 5:46 pm:

    I can’t seem to get past these two nagging questions: 1) why didn’t the employee file a report with the Inspector General (and still hasn’t); and 2) how can the attorney, as an officer of the courts, willingly offer a hush money settlement without facing serious ARDC sanctions? I’m not an attorney and maybe I don’t understand the intricacies, but as an observer of the process, there are too many things that are not adding up on this.


  16. - Wensicia - Monday, Feb 3, 14 @ 5:47 pm:

    The timeline (and timing) of recent damaging events concerning Rutherford seems contrived, especially as new developments are coming out daily. I won’t say set-up, but it would be hard to convince me otherwise.


  17. - Mrs. Rauner - Monday, Feb 3, 14 @ 5:50 pm:

    Give it up Danny, you’re time is over.


  18. - Pot calling kettle - Monday, Feb 3, 14 @ 5:52 pm:

    ==Perhaps your Mr. Rutherford should not have held such a bizarre press conference then. It seems that he’s the one who’s opened the door. ==

    Whose Mr. Rutherford? He doesn’t belong to anyone. It is highly unlikely that he opened the door willingly. It is much more likely that the complainant threatened to go to the media or that a reporter called Rutherford for comment. Rutherford then had to decide whether to wait for the story to come out or to go on the offensive. He chose the latter.


  19. - Chad - Monday, Feb 3, 14 @ 5:52 pm:

    Anon: People can disagree over whether his press conference was well-calculated. The guy has denied harrassment, but the ST titilates in response. Pretty low.


  20. - Anonymous - Monday, Feb 3, 14 @ 5:54 pm:

    I’m sorry. I obviously missed the denial of harassment charges. Do you have a link to the article?


  21. - Anonymous - Monday, Feb 3, 14 @ 5:57 pm:

    =Whose Mr. Rutherford?=

    My, my, Pot. It was merely a typo. Didn’t mean to insult anyone’s sensitivities.


  22. - Cheswick - Monday, Feb 3, 14 @ 5:57 pm:

    There are no sanctions if an attorney offers a settlement proposal for a civil case in good faith. I am not defending her, but that’s how it works.


  23. - Chad - Monday, Feb 3, 14 @ 5:57 pm:

    He said it at the Trib event. Global denial of everything.


  24. - Anonymous - Monday, Feb 3, 14 @ 5:59 pm:

    Next thing you know, people are going to begin screaming over someone welcoming someone “home” from a trip.


  25. - Anonymous - Monday, Feb 3, 14 @ 6:00 pm:

    Sorry. Who said what at the Trib event?


  26. - All is fair - Monday, Feb 3, 14 @ 6:01 pm:

    all of the Constitutionals have people who work for them doing political work. You can’t do it on state time, but you can do it on your own time. It’s probably illegal for almost all of them (maybe all) to have their employment tied to their outside political activities. But reality is that large numbers of these employees are in that situation.

    Now when you start putting the squeeze on people, especially lower paid people, you get problems


  27. - So... - Monday, Feb 3, 14 @ 6:04 pm:

    I don’t know where you folks are coming from who say the attorney could face sanctions. An out of court settlement with a non disclosure clause is fairly common in civil litigation.


  28. - Anonymous - Monday, Feb 3, 14 @ 6:29 pm:

    I don’t understand what length of employment would shed on the situation. It’s not as if there’s some sort of magical “if-then-else” script to follow–even when speculating that will result in a valid determination or verdict.


  29. - Percival - Monday, Feb 3, 14 @ 6:34 pm:

    It is not “common” when the money is demanded by an attorney to prevent exposure of purportedly criminal conduct. That makes a big difference.


  30. - Anonymous - Monday, Feb 3, 14 @ 6:37 pm:

    I guess I’m done with this thread. I do believe in our legal process and some of these questions are irritating enough to almost prejudice me against Mr. Rutherford. And full disclosure: I have no clue as to whether the attorney involved is a friend of Dan Proft (current or otherwise) and if on the off-chance I’ve ever met her, it was obviously long ago and brief.

    But keep speculating along those lines, “Dan Fans” and see how much support it does or does not get you.


  31. - Oswego Willy - Monday, Feb 3, 14 @ 6:38 pm:

    ===…the employee told the Sun-Times.===

    Between the lawyer and the accuser, there seems to be a great deal of chatter with one side of the table, and the press at large, (radio, and newspapers it seems).

    To that point, the Friday morning presser, in the context of how the lawyer and the accuser seem to freely talk within the boundaries, and really not running to far away from a spotlight they could control, …

    it doesn’t seem too out of the realm of possibility that Rutherford felt very compelled to have that Friday presser.

    The presser was hasty, and vague, and tried to get in front of what, maybe a more sharper version of what we are seeing right now?

    The Sun Times may have called to check on the accuser, or the accuser may have dropped the info in a call to the Sun Times, to let them know what was going on, and with the 8 day window, gives everyone pause to possibly come up with a solution.

    The whole thing is just tasteless. I do think the reporting of the resignation by the accuser, (or was it a call by the Times, and the accuser ‘droppped’ the info, I don’t know) keeps this out there until end of business on the 10th, with probably what we are getting know, the piece by piece dropping of what could be critical info to find out what is really going on.

    The Plot Thickens, Indeed.


  32. - Percival - Monday, Feb 3, 14 @ 6:57 pm:

    The strong link between this attorney and Proft has existed for years and is common knowledge in GOP circles in Chicago. That is not speculation. What is speculation is to say that this hit is in fact coming from Proft.


  33. - hisgirlfriday - Monday, Feb 3, 14 @ 7:16 pm:

    Like Soccermom, I am wondering why this person’s name is a secret if all that is being alleged is the political work angle.

    I know that Rutherford’s weird press conference got this all started, but this breathless report
    from a secret person about an undetailed allegation of unspecified impropriety to be put into a formalized complaint at a future date is just annoying. This headline could just as well be: “Unnamed person resigns from unknown position for unknown reasons”


  34. - Just Me - Monday, Feb 3, 14 @ 7:17 pm:

    I find it so hard to believe that Rutherford would be stupid enough to encourage state employees to do political work while on state time. It just seems unfathomable to me.


  35. - hisgirlfriday - Monday, Feb 3, 14 @ 7:19 pm:

    Oh and just as I post that we get the UIS report with the additional angle.

    So this person doesn’t want to be named, but is reaching out to both the Sun-Times and WUIS to make sure this story gets out there? So bizarre.


  36. - Anonymous - Monday, Feb 3, 14 @ 7:20 pm:

    The question, which seems to have been deleted, seemed to try to insinuate that because there’s a friendship between the two, the answer to the second is obvious.

    I can’t tell you how sick to death I already am regarding “sources of the hit” and all the drama. The questions that matter are: Is there a claim/complaint? What is the nature of the allegations? And everything else then becomes obvious, including the general timeline associated with obtaining a determination and/or verdict–unless a settlement is negotiated and made. If “others” were in fact possibly somehow involved and it’s relevant to any of the cases or the claims, those people will probably be included in discovery assuming a civil case.

    In the meantime, voters will obviously just have to decide for themselves as to whether they have concerns or not based on the facts that are revealed.


  37. - hisgirlfriday - Monday, Feb 3, 14 @ 7:22 pm:

    Oh they’ve got out their story to the Tribune too.

    http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/politics/clout/chi-employee-at-center-of-rutherford-allegations-resigns-20140203,0,5894948.story?track=rss

    Just curious if these reporters would be keeping the accuser’s name a secret if it was a woman?


  38. - Anonymous - Monday, Feb 3, 14 @ 7:26 pm:

    =I find it so hard to believe that Rutherford would be stupid enough to encourage state employees to do political work while on state time=

    I would imagine that if you’re scheduling both official “state” events and campaign events and bringing staff with you who are either one or the other, things could get a little unclear just from a work scheduling perspective alone.


  39. - Rich Miller - Monday, Feb 3, 14 @ 7:27 pm:

    ===if it was a woman? ===

    I would.


  40. - PoolGuy - Monday, Feb 3, 14 @ 7:33 pm:

    if you are being frugal with your somewhat limited campaign funds and don’t want campaign staff driving all over the state to sit around at state events and hope your work staff will fill in the blanks, things could get a little fishy at times.


  41. - woodchuck - Monday, Feb 3, 14 @ 7:41 pm:

    After reading the updated stories, I’m left with the analysis that there’s a key distinction in the attorney’s language — and that distinction is the difference between the words “may” and “shall”. She “may” have a complaint. She “may” have additional people come out of the woodwork. The word “may” is just a word to drive speculation, sell newspapers, and most importantly, a word to attempt people to be nervous. The word “may” in a bill, is a way to get more votes. The word “shall” is way more definitive about one’s intentions. I’ve know Dan for some time and he is so conscientious about separating governing and politics. In all his campaigns, for the House, the Senate, the Secretary of State, Treasurer, and never a complaint from all the people who worked for him. Not one. Zero. Now, we’re led to believe he has turned in Tristano. No way. I don’t buy it. If he had a pattern of doing that, it would have been exposed a long time ago. There would have been complaints. Like most people, I’m waiting until all the facts come out and I hope he’s exonerated. If he did something wrong, then he should pay the costs, but in my experience and history, he’s just not going to change decades of attention to detail and ethics for … this.


  42. - hisgirlfriday - Monday, Feb 3, 14 @ 7:42 pm:

    @Rich -

    Fair enough. I am just thinking of past scandals involving pols and published sexual harassment allegations and at the moment am having trouble thinking of cases where the accuser’s name was not also published with the allegations. Like Anita Hill or the women who accused Bill Clinton or Herman Cain.


  43. - All is fair - Monday, Feb 3, 14 @ 7:43 pm:

    It’s not necessarily about working on state time. It could be about being forced to do political work on your own time. In fact, that’s where the beef often has come in these cases. Hell, they don’t care if they’re working politics on the government dime. It’s being forced to march in a parade on a saturday or lose your job that gets some people ticked.

    although this guy pretty clearly got his job based on politics, right?

    He’s a dem. maybe he was a pat quinn plant. :)


  44. - Smoggie - Monday, Feb 3, 14 @ 7:51 pm:

    Regarding confidentiality and whether this is a shake down or a settlement –

    It will depend on whether Rutherford has any proof as to who brought up confidentiality first.

    If the plaintiff’s counsel offers it up front, then she’s got ARDC issues (and maybe worse).

    Confidentiality is something that is almost always demanded by the defense and typically it has an extra cost. In fact, the settlement paperwork would need to establish confidentiality is a paid for term of the settlement (whether or not that’s true is another matter — often a dollar figure is reached and then part of it is allocated to confidentiality).

    While the clauses are routine (I tend to include them in just about any case I settle for a defendant unless the settlement is so low that it shows the case was frivolous) it is always the defense guy making the demand of confidentiality.

    When the plaintiff’s attorney demands it, all sorts of red flags go off.

    But again, this goes to proof. If it is simply Rutherford saying she offered it, and the plaintiff’s counsel saying that Rutherford demanded it, then it is not going anywhere.


  45. - Just The Way It Is One - Monday, Feb 3, 14 @ 7:59 pm:

    Oh boy, hate to just say it, but…this is gonna take Rutherford down this Election Cycle, ‘cuz it’s not so much who’ll be telling the truth right now–it’s just the nature of the alleGAtion that’ll prove too much of a taint on him, even it turns out to be utter nonsense eventually–because there won’t be enough time for DR to recover…!


  46. - Tony U - Monday, Feb 3, 14 @ 8:25 pm:

    - Capitol View - Monday, Feb 3, 14 @ 5:46 pm:

    every single politician gets this nonsense thrown at him. Jim Thompson got married as he campaigned for Governor or shortly after he won, but as a long term bachelor there were always whispers…

    I just want to say that things aren’t always “nonsense” to people in the know (EPU).


  47. - Bobo - Monday, Feb 3, 14 @ 8:39 pm:

    This is complete horse (you know what) Politically driven slurs timed perfectly to take a guy out. I really hope it back fires. It probably will if Rutherford just hangs in there.


  48. - The Historian - Monday, Feb 3, 14 @ 8:40 pm:

    I’m sorry, but I think this story has reached the point where it’s fundamentally unfair to Rutherford for Rich, among many others, to keep the supposed accuser’s name ’secret’ as privileged ‘private knowledge.’ Put it out there so that everyone has a better ability to judge just what’s really going on here, whether from Proft or others.


  49. - Percival - Monday, Feb 3, 14 @ 8:51 pm:

    “In the meantime, voters will obviously just have to decide for themselves as to whether they have concerns or not based on the facts that are revealed.” Wouldn’t the fact that the story came out of an opposition campaign be relevant to voters in deciding what is true and what is not? I suppose it could happen, but I doubt that this soap opera will be resolved by Primary Day, the voters will have to decide.


  50. - xxtofer - Monday, Feb 3, 14 @ 9:05 pm:

    I asked a friend who works in politics which was worse for Rutherford, to be semi-outed/rumoured or to be accused of the political/official misconduct. His answer — in the Republican world, it’s the former.


  51. - Bobo - Monday, Feb 3, 14 @ 9:12 pm:

    So on the day of the Presser Rauner says,

    “Treasurer Rutherford should spend his time answering the serious claims made against him by a state employee,”

    today he says “he doesn’t even know what the allegations are about..it’s silly”

    Obviously, he seems to have known more about this Friday than today


  52. - Anonymous - Monday, Feb 3, 14 @ 9:31 pm:

    =Wouldn’t the fact that the story came out of an opposition campaign be relevant to voters in deciding what is true and what is not?=

    Percival, I’m going to guess you already know the answer to that question. If not, just read it again and I’m sure you’ll figure it out.


  53. - Soccermom - Monday, Feb 3, 14 @ 10:16 pm:

    Okay. The Trib ran this guy’s name.
    http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2013-10-03/news/ct-met-des-plaines-police-harassment-lawsuit-20131004_1_lawsuit-sexual-harassment-sergeant
    And this woman’s name
    http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2013-11-08/news/chi-chicago-police-officer-says-sergeant-forced-her-to-have-sex-20131107_1_federal-lawsuit-civil-lawsuit-chicago-police-officer
    and this woman’s name
    http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2013-12-27/news/chi-south-side-alderman-files-lawsuit-alleging-extortion-20131227_1_alderman-anthony-beale-cps-officials
    and this woman’s name
    http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2013-08-23/entertainment/chi-deal-to-dismiss-paula-deen-sexual-harassment-discrimination-lawsuit-signed-20130823_1_paula-deen-bubba-hiers-plantation-themed-wedding
    Oh, you get the idea…


  54. - Anon - Monday, Feb 3, 14 @ 10:17 pm:

    Bobo,
    It wasn’t Rauner who said “Treasurer Rutherford should spend his time answering the serious claims made against him by a state employee”, it was a campaign spokesman. Two different people.


  55. - an innocent observer - Monday, Feb 3, 14 @ 10:17 pm:

    I’m definitly going to get some movie theater butter popcorn, a extra large coke, sit back and enjoy the show!


  56. - IbendahlLuvsJBT - Monday, Feb 3, 14 @ 10:25 pm:

    The accuser is reportedly in a whole lotta debt. Motive, anyone? http://www.chicagobusiness.com/article/20140203/BLOGS02/140209983


  57. - woodchuck - Monday, Feb 3, 14 @ 10:27 pm:

    Anon - Shrimpf is speaking for Rauner. That means he ostensibly had the comments vetted before he spoke them. Did Rauner refute Shrimpf? Oh yeah, today he did. He said he didn’t know about it. So his campaign mouthpiece says one thing and the candidate, with all of Kirk’s staff behind him, claims the spokesperson was wrong? The same Rauner who is going to run state government like a business? A business who says one thing on a Friday and different thing on a Monday? It doesn’t add up. If Rauner had said today that his spokesperson misspoke, it would have been okay. It would have allowed him to save face, but he didn’t. Saying nothing today said everything.


  58. - Rollo Tomasi - Monday, Feb 3, 14 @ 10:49 pm:

    Rauner is a very close friend of Rahm. He is pointers from the best.


  59. - Pot calling kettle - Monday, Feb 3, 14 @ 11:04 pm:

    I need to go to bed. This all seems to convenient (or inconvenient) and I’m having visions of some elaborate set up against Rutherford. I think I have seen too many episodes of Mission Impossible or House of Cards. My head is spinning and I need to walk away before I start making tinfoil hats.


  60. - Arthur Andersen - Tuesday, Feb 4, 14 @ 12:56 am:

    Pot, AA feels the same way. The House of Cards (show and grammatical versions) theme rings so true here.

    Just to get the pot stirring even better, the S-T leads tomorrow with two hits at BR and charters, including a blurb suggesting his dough helped keep UNO afloat while PQ had bricked their approps.


  61. - Juvenal - Tuesday, Feb 4, 14 @ 8:30 am:

    I highly doubt anyone was sexually harrassed by someone who attended their wedding.


  62. - Anonymous - Tuesday, Feb 4, 14 @ 6:47 pm:

    Are you basing that on an opinion, statistic, job, or payment, Juvenal? Or are you dropping crumbs that everyone’s already seen, but not willing to nibble on?


Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.


* *** UPDATED x2 - Cullerton responds *** Rauner won't schedule leaders meeting until Dems "are ready"
* Mendoza bumps manager bonuses to back of the line
* Caption contest!
* CPS prospectus includes mention of "hypothetical bankruptcy"
* Fun with numbers
* Question of the day: Golden Horseshoe Awards
* CMS blames AFSCME for halt to bonuses
* Good news and not so great news in Site Selection report
* Chris Kennedy added to "Boss Madigan" list
* *** UPDATED x1 *** Are we really going to have to wait until 2018?
* Rauner's dark money prince could wind up running the RNC
* Madigan on the attack, offers to discuss modified version of "Turnaround Agenda"
* IMA says Rauner signature on Exelon bill weakens manufacturing
* It's more than just a website and e-mails
* Kennedy may file candidate papers "in short order," while Bustos moves up DC ladder
* Del Mar gets his plum
* Emanuel meeting with Trump this morning
* So now they tell us
* *** UPDATED x1 - Cullerton optimistic but firm *** Rauner slams Madigan for refusing to put forward a budget, wanting a tax hike, stalling to force a crisis
* Yesterday's blog posts

Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............
<


Search This Blog...

Search the 98th General Assembly By Bill Number
(example: HB0001)

Search the 98th General Assembly By Keyword

  
* T-Mobile announces Digits, a phone number for all of your devices
* Playable Demos of 'Super Mario Run' in Apple Stores From Today
* Glass class of 2017: all-glass LG G6 rumored, headphone jack stays in
* ARM64-x86 emulation shown off for Snapdragon-powered full Windows 10 phones
* ‘Super Mario Run’ and the shape of Nintendo to come — an interview with Reggie Fils-Aimé
* Galaxy Beta Program shows off TouchWiz’s new name: Samsung Experience
* Android app updates are getting 65 percent smaller

* Moncada welcomes expectations awaiting White Sox
* In span of day, White Sox system skyrockets
* Kopech next in long line of Texas fireballers
* White Sox land Giolito, 2 more prospects for Eaton
* In rebuild mode, Hahn has 5 assets to deal
* White Sox GM Rick Hahn is the prospect collector
* Best prospects traded in past 25 years

...............


Main Menu
Home
Illinois
YouTube
Pundit rankings
Obama
Subscriber Content
Durbin
Burris
Blagojevich Trial
Advertising
Updated Posts
Polls

Archives
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005

Syndication

RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0
WordPress

Loading


* Rauner asks Democrats for budget proposal, dela.....
* Morning Spin: Rauner fights with union over $10.....
* The Latest: 'Clean jobs' group applauds Rauner .....
* Illinois Gov. Bruce Rauner signs bill sparing 2.....
* Rauner Asks Democrats for Budget Proposal, Dela.....


* EXCHANGE: Retired Mendota detective now helps kids
* Energy Department grants to fund Illinois CO2 projects
* Suburban tobacco store manager sentenced in tax case
* Group offers reward to fight dog fighting in DuPage County
* Illinois firearm deer harvest down 8.5 percent this year
* Chicago officer convicted of perjury, 2 officers acquitted
* Doctor: candy that sickened students contained marijuana
* Purported Chicago gang leader to jurors: Gang never existed
* Illinois Gov. Rauner signs bill sparing 2 nuclear plants
* Rauner asks Democrats for budget proposal, delays meeting

* Springfield-area veterans join pipeline protest
* Rauner asks Democrats for budget proposal, cancels meeting
* Comptroller: State employee bonuses on hold during impasse
* Rauner signs Exelon subsidy to spare 2 nuclear plants
* Rauner to sign Exelon subsidy to spare 2 nuclear plants
* Judge blocks administration from imposing contract on AFSCME
* State budget still elusive as leaders lash out
* Illinois budget still elusive as leaders lash out
* Killer of former central Illinois man sentenced to probation
* Prosecutors: Don't move Aaron Schock trial out of Springfield

* So you want to be a 40 Under 40
* Twins in Chicago's tech sector—separately
* Lothian hands CEO title to newsletter editor
* Chicago is getting another newsroom
* Another newsroom is coming to town


* Cops: Shot fired at police in University Village
* Man grazed in Lawndale shooting
* Attempted bank robbery reported in Chicago Heights
* Georgia Nicols horoscopes for Dec. 8, 2016
* Dear Abby: ‘Orphan’ at 55 feels like he’s hit bottom
* 7 people shot Wednesday on South, West sides
* 13-year-old girl disappears from Uptown
* Trump chooses hardliners but talks softer on immigration
* Aroldis Chapman signs five-year deal to return to Yankees
* MGM National Harbor ready for its Maryland debut


* 8 wounded in shootings on West, South sides
* 13-year-old missing from North Side medical facility
* Report: Aroldis Chapman, Yankees reach deal for $86M, 5 years
* Hoax beliefs fueled death threats to Sandy Hook parent, Florida woman charged: Feds
* Campus officer shot teen armed with knife at Nevada high school
* New York restaurant threatened by Pizzagate hoax callers
* Don't dismiss Vic Fangio leaving Bears just yet
* Trump retaliated against Carrier's union leader on Twitter. Then his phone started to ring.
* Ohio legislators approve what would be the country's toughest restriction on abortion
* Crowd braves cold to remember slain Dolton rapper


The widget AQL4JYGHIY powered by Feed Informer does not exist.


* Bernard Schoenburg: Bustos gets leadership post, criticizes Rauner
* Our View: Lawmakers should withdraw their lawsuit over paychecks
* George Will: The sensitivity police strike again
* Eugene Robinson: The proliferation of fake news presents real perils
* Guest Column: The Trump Administration faces extremism/terrorism
* Springfield-area veterans join pipeline protest
* Rauner asks Democrats for budget proposal, cancels meeting
* Comptroller: State employee bonuses on hold during impasse
* Rauner signs Exelon subsidy to spare 2 nuclear plants
* Rauner to sign Exelon subsidy to spare 2 nuclear plants


* Amanda's picks: 5 things to do this weekend
* Inaugral Christmas stroll planned in Harrison-Bruce Historical Village
* Ronald Taskoski
* Wendell Davis
* Mary Foehner
* Paul Youngblood
* Margaret Osman
* Maryann Mercer
* Steven Kelley
* Shirley Jones


* Dawn Patrol: Kane County chairman accuses state's attorney of buying loyalty
* Capitals lose 3-goal lead, recover to beat Bruins in OT
* Review: 'Hairspray Live!' pushes the boundaries and wins big
* Plum's 30 leads No. 11 Washington women to 101-44 win
* Extra effort in Wauconda's win

* House lawmakers overcome hurdle on key tra...
* Rodney Davis talks funding with Bloomingto...
* The agency that fought Illiana gets a new ...
* Rep. Dold takes educational cruise down Ch...
* Lawmakers decry high turnover rate of VA h...
* CBD Oil, and politics
* Simon considering state Senate bid
* Killer Congressman Tom MacArthur trying to...
* Shutdown? State may not notice
* Rep. Bob Dold

* Durbin's debit debacle - Washington Examin......

* Sen. Mark Kirk Praised During Senate Floor......

* Girl, 13, Missing From Uptown Hospital
* How times change; Rahm now our ally in upcoming political fight w/ Trump
* Santa Sleighed
* Roller Skate With Santa At Margate Park
* Illinois Bible Colleges Head to Court of Appeals
* Thorner: Grassroots pushback essential for Trump to appoint pro-life nominee
* IL GOP jabs possible Dem gubernatorial nominee, three more lawmakers
* Trump taps Iowa Governor Branstad for Ambassador to China
* Chicago YPN raises more than $400 for Salvation Army
* Governor Announces Appointments to Illinois Bicentennial Commission


* Governor’s Export Awards Recipients Announced
* Governor Signs Legislation to Protect Jobs, Ratepayers and Taxpayers
* Give The Gift Of A Lifetime With A College Illinois!® 529 Prepaid Tuition Plan - College Illinois! can help limit or even eliminate future student loan debt
* Illinois Department of Veterans’ Affairs Hosts 75th Pearl Harbor Remembrance Day Ceremony
* IDHR Issues Reminder of Fair Housing Rights During Holiday Season - State law prohibits targeted, discriminatory restrictions on decorations and celebrations




      Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller