SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      Mobile Version     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact
CapitolFax.com
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
*** UPDATED x1 *** The Rutherford plot thickens

Monday, Feb 3, 2014

* Sun-Times

The Illinois State Treasurer employee behind allegations against State Treasurer Dan Rutherford resigned from his position Monday, the employee told the Sun-Times.

The man, who asked that his name not yet be used, said he submitted his resignation letter Monday following what he called an “intimidating” news conference held by Rutherford on Friday, with a former FBI agent at his side. […]

The employee told the Sun-Times in an interview Monday that his complaint entailed harassment claims and pressure to do political work.

Apparently, the employee took compensatory time, so his resignation doesn’t become official until Feb. 10, meaning the treasurer’s office can’t yet comment.

*** UPDATE *** WUIS

A man who says he was a victim of sexual harassment by Treasurer Dan Rutherford has submitted a letter of resignation. […]

The alleged victim describes unwanted advances by Treasurer Rutherford, and accuses him of trying to force state employees to work on behalf of his campaign for governor.

Oy.

We are all really in for it now.

- Posted by Rich Miller        


62 Comments
  1. - Oswego Willy - Monday, Feb 3, 14 @ 5:06 pm:

    Longest 8 days for Dan Rutherford’s campaign.

    Kinda boxed both the political and governmental.

    “Intimidating”. Ugliness at every turn.


  2. - All is fair - Monday, Feb 3, 14 @ 5:16 pm:

    how does the effective date affect the time when they can comment. Is that what they’re saying? I would think it to be irrelevant.


  3. - Anonymous - Monday, Feb 3, 14 @ 5:22 pm:

    Interesting. Don’t claimants usually hang out, daring their employer to fire or lay them off so that they can further substantiate their claim with a retaliatory discharge–or just hang around doing nothing, fully aware that their safe because the employer doesn’t want to be seen as retaliating?

    It’s a pretty effective strategy in Corporate American nowadays.


  4. - Demoralized - Monday, Feb 3, 14 @ 5:24 pm:

    ==how does the effective date affect the time when they can comment.==

    He’s an active employee still. You don’t comment on personnel matters.


  5. - Anonymous - Monday, Feb 3, 14 @ 5:28 pm:

    =It’s a pretty effective strategy in Corporate American nowadays. =

    I’ll add, explaining why it is that everyone who has not filed a sex, sex harassment, or national origin claim/suit or has not suddenly decided to run to the MD to get their knees fixed are laid off instead.


  6. - All is fair - Monday, Feb 3, 14 @ 5:29 pm:

    You just as typically don’t comment on personnel matters after people are fired. That’s why I’m wondering why they said this. Do we really believe that we’ll get more info in 8 days? I doubt it. Should have just said it’s a personnel issue. no comment.

    Which maybe is what they did say. That’s what I’m curious about


  7. - Soccermom - Monday, Feb 3, 14 @ 5:29 pm:

    Hey, if he’s saying he was forced to do political work, I don’t understand why his name is being kept secret. This is starting to smell.


  8. - Chad - Monday, Feb 3, 14 @ 5:31 pm:

    Rutherford is just too much of a Boy Scout to have knowingly had people doing politics on the payroll. He saw all the ugly stuff that happened with Tristano, so I doubt he would be so stupid. There are very simple legal standards to apply there, so if someone stepped over the line, no problem in resolving that pretty quickly. Being part of the vast uninformed, what is disturbing to me is that the ST seems to be enabling the impression of some kind of sex scandal. If the goods are not there, this should stop. A great newspaper does not do that.


  9. - Madge - Monday, Feb 3, 14 @ 5:33 pm:

    Rutherford is done as soon as the complaint is formally filed by the accuser. The details will put the Rutherford campaign in perma explainin’ mode until the final, humiliating numbers come in on the evening of March 18.


  10. - Anonymous - Monday, Feb 3, 14 @ 5:37 pm:

    =That’s why I’m wondering why they said this. =

    Well that part is pretty obvious, I think from the text that’s been provided. They are stating that the “claimant/plaintiff/whatever he is right now” was intimidated by Rutherford’s press conference which included the two “official-looking” gentlemen standing on either side of Mr. Rutherford–and I’d imagine that pains to which Mr. Rutherford went to explain their backgrounds.

    You can agree and/or disagree as to whether it’s heartfelt and/or a tactic, but I’d argue that it did seem quite unusual.


  11. - PoolGuy - Monday, Feb 3, 14 @ 5:43 pm:

    actually that FBI guy on the right kinda scared me too. and knowing he is about to be taken through the ringer, maybe another week or so to settle his nerves is needed.


  12. - PoolGuy - Monday, Feb 3, 14 @ 5:44 pm:

    *wringer


  13. - Anonymous - Monday, Feb 3, 14 @ 5:45 pm:

    =A great newspaper does not do that. =

    Perhaps your Mr. Rutherford should not have held such a bizarre press conference then. It seems that he’s the one who’s opened the door.


  14. - Capitol View - Monday, Feb 3, 14 @ 5:46 pm:

    every single politician gets this nonsense thrown at him. Jim Thompson got married as he campaigned for Governor or shortly after he won, but as a long term bachelor there were always whispers…


  15. - woodchuck - Monday, Feb 3, 14 @ 5:46 pm:

    I can’t seem to get past these two nagging questions: 1) why didn’t the employee file a report with the Inspector General (and still hasn’t); and 2) how can the attorney, as an officer of the courts, willingly offer a hush money settlement without facing serious ARDC sanctions? I’m not an attorney and maybe I don’t understand the intricacies, but as an observer of the process, there are too many things that are not adding up on this.


  16. - Wensicia - Monday, Feb 3, 14 @ 5:47 pm:

    The timeline (and timing) of recent damaging events concerning Rutherford seems contrived, especially as new developments are coming out daily. I won’t say set-up, but it would be hard to convince me otherwise.


  17. - Mrs. Rauner - Monday, Feb 3, 14 @ 5:50 pm:

    Give it up Danny, you’re time is over.


  18. - Pot calling kettle - Monday, Feb 3, 14 @ 5:52 pm:

    ==Perhaps your Mr. Rutherford should not have held such a bizarre press conference then. It seems that he’s the one who’s opened the door. ==

    Whose Mr. Rutherford? He doesn’t belong to anyone. It is highly unlikely that he opened the door willingly. It is much more likely that the complainant threatened to go to the media or that a reporter called Rutherford for comment. Rutherford then had to decide whether to wait for the story to come out or to go on the offensive. He chose the latter.


  19. - Chad - Monday, Feb 3, 14 @ 5:52 pm:

    Anon: People can disagree over whether his press conference was well-calculated. The guy has denied harrassment, but the ST titilates in response. Pretty low.


  20. - Anonymous - Monday, Feb 3, 14 @ 5:54 pm:

    I’m sorry. I obviously missed the denial of harassment charges. Do you have a link to the article?


  21. - Anonymous - Monday, Feb 3, 14 @ 5:57 pm:

    =Whose Mr. Rutherford?=

    My, my, Pot. It was merely a typo. Didn’t mean to insult anyone’s sensitivities.


  22. - Cheswick - Monday, Feb 3, 14 @ 5:57 pm:

    There are no sanctions if an attorney offers a settlement proposal for a civil case in good faith. I am not defending her, but that’s how it works.


  23. - Chad - Monday, Feb 3, 14 @ 5:57 pm:

    He said it at the Trib event. Global denial of everything.


  24. - Anonymous - Monday, Feb 3, 14 @ 5:59 pm:

    Next thing you know, people are going to begin screaming over someone welcoming someone “home” from a trip.


  25. - Anonymous - Monday, Feb 3, 14 @ 6:00 pm:

    Sorry. Who said what at the Trib event?


  26. - All is fair - Monday, Feb 3, 14 @ 6:01 pm:

    all of the Constitutionals have people who work for them doing political work. You can’t do it on state time, but you can do it on your own time. It’s probably illegal for almost all of them (maybe all) to have their employment tied to their outside political activities. But reality is that large numbers of these employees are in that situation.

    Now when you start putting the squeeze on people, especially lower paid people, you get problems


  27. - So... - Monday, Feb 3, 14 @ 6:04 pm:

    I don’t know where you folks are coming from who say the attorney could face sanctions. An out of court settlement with a non disclosure clause is fairly common in civil litigation.


  28. - Anonymous - Monday, Feb 3, 14 @ 6:29 pm:

    I don’t understand what length of employment would shed on the situation. It’s not as if there’s some sort of magical “if-then-else” script to follow–even when speculating that will result in a valid determination or verdict.


  29. - Percival - Monday, Feb 3, 14 @ 6:34 pm:

    It is not “common” when the money is demanded by an attorney to prevent exposure of purportedly criminal conduct. That makes a big difference.


  30. - Anonymous - Monday, Feb 3, 14 @ 6:37 pm:

    I guess I’m done with this thread. I do believe in our legal process and some of these questions are irritating enough to almost prejudice me against Mr. Rutherford. And full disclosure: I have no clue as to whether the attorney involved is a friend of Dan Proft (current or otherwise) and if on the off-chance I’ve ever met her, it was obviously long ago and brief.

    But keep speculating along those lines, “Dan Fans” and see how much support it does or does not get you.


  31. - Oswego Willy - Monday, Feb 3, 14 @ 6:38 pm:

    ===…the employee told the Sun-Times.===

    Between the lawyer and the accuser, there seems to be a great deal of chatter with one side of the table, and the press at large, (radio, and newspapers it seems).

    To that point, the Friday morning presser, in the context of how the lawyer and the accuser seem to freely talk within the boundaries, and really not running to far away from a spotlight they could control, …

    it doesn’t seem too out of the realm of possibility that Rutherford felt very compelled to have that Friday presser.

    The presser was hasty, and vague, and tried to get in front of what, maybe a more sharper version of what we are seeing right now?

    The Sun Times may have called to check on the accuser, or the accuser may have dropped the info in a call to the Sun Times, to let them know what was going on, and with the 8 day window, gives everyone pause to possibly come up with a solution.

    The whole thing is just tasteless. I do think the reporting of the resignation by the accuser, (or was it a call by the Times, and the accuser ‘droppped’ the info, I don’t know) keeps this out there until end of business on the 10th, with probably what we are getting know, the piece by piece dropping of what could be critical info to find out what is really going on.

    The Plot Thickens, Indeed.


  32. - Percival - Monday, Feb 3, 14 @ 6:57 pm:

    The strong link between this attorney and Proft has existed for years and is common knowledge in GOP circles in Chicago. That is not speculation. What is speculation is to say that this hit is in fact coming from Proft.


  33. - hisgirlfriday - Monday, Feb 3, 14 @ 7:16 pm:

    Like Soccermom, I am wondering why this person’s name is a secret if all that is being alleged is the political work angle.

    I know that Rutherford’s weird press conference got this all started, but this breathless report
    from a secret person about an undetailed allegation of unspecified impropriety to be put into a formalized complaint at a future date is just annoying. This headline could just as well be: “Unnamed person resigns from unknown position for unknown reasons”


  34. - Just Me - Monday, Feb 3, 14 @ 7:17 pm:

    I find it so hard to believe that Rutherford would be stupid enough to encourage state employees to do political work while on state time. It just seems unfathomable to me.


  35. - hisgirlfriday - Monday, Feb 3, 14 @ 7:19 pm:

    Oh and just as I post that we get the UIS report with the additional angle.

    So this person doesn’t want to be named, but is reaching out to both the Sun-Times and WUIS to make sure this story gets out there? So bizarre.


  36. - Anonymous - Monday, Feb 3, 14 @ 7:20 pm:

    The question, which seems to have been deleted, seemed to try to insinuate that because there’s a friendship between the two, the answer to the second is obvious.

    I can’t tell you how sick to death I already am regarding “sources of the hit” and all the drama. The questions that matter are: Is there a claim/complaint? What is the nature of the allegations? And everything else then becomes obvious, including the general timeline associated with obtaining a determination and/or verdict–unless a settlement is negotiated and made. If “others” were in fact possibly somehow involved and it’s relevant to any of the cases or the claims, those people will probably be included in discovery assuming a civil case.

    In the meantime, voters will obviously just have to decide for themselves as to whether they have concerns or not based on the facts that are revealed.


  37. - hisgirlfriday - Monday, Feb 3, 14 @ 7:22 pm:

    Oh they’ve got out their story to the Tribune too.

    http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/politics/clout/chi-employee-at-center-of-rutherford-allegations-resigns-20140203,0,5894948.story?track=rss

    Just curious if these reporters would be keeping the accuser’s name a secret if it was a woman?


  38. - Anonymous - Monday, Feb 3, 14 @ 7:26 pm:

    =I find it so hard to believe that Rutherford would be stupid enough to encourage state employees to do political work while on state time=

    I would imagine that if you’re scheduling both official “state” events and campaign events and bringing staff with you who are either one or the other, things could get a little unclear just from a work scheduling perspective alone.


  39. - Rich Miller - Monday, Feb 3, 14 @ 7:27 pm:

    ===if it was a woman? ===

    I would.


  40. - PoolGuy - Monday, Feb 3, 14 @ 7:33 pm:

    if you are being frugal with your somewhat limited campaign funds and don’t want campaign staff driving all over the state to sit around at state events and hope your work staff will fill in the blanks, things could get a little fishy at times.


  41. - woodchuck - Monday, Feb 3, 14 @ 7:41 pm:

    After reading the updated stories, I’m left with the analysis that there’s a key distinction in the attorney’s language — and that distinction is the difference between the words “may” and “shall”. She “may” have a complaint. She “may” have additional people come out of the woodwork. The word “may” is just a word to drive speculation, sell newspapers, and most importantly, a word to attempt people to be nervous. The word “may” in a bill, is a way to get more votes. The word “shall” is way more definitive about one’s intentions. I’ve know Dan for some time and he is so conscientious about separating governing and politics. In all his campaigns, for the House, the Senate, the Secretary of State, Treasurer, and never a complaint from all the people who worked for him. Not one. Zero. Now, we’re led to believe he has turned in Tristano. No way. I don’t buy it. If he had a pattern of doing that, it would have been exposed a long time ago. There would have been complaints. Like most people, I’m waiting until all the facts come out and I hope he’s exonerated. If he did something wrong, then he should pay the costs, but in my experience and history, he’s just not going to change decades of attention to detail and ethics for … this.


  42. - hisgirlfriday - Monday, Feb 3, 14 @ 7:42 pm:

    @Rich -

    Fair enough. I am just thinking of past scandals involving pols and published sexual harassment allegations and at the moment am having trouble thinking of cases where the accuser’s name was not also published with the allegations. Like Anita Hill or the women who accused Bill Clinton or Herman Cain.


  43. - All is fair - Monday, Feb 3, 14 @ 7:43 pm:

    It’s not necessarily about working on state time. It could be about being forced to do political work on your own time. In fact, that’s where the beef often has come in these cases. Hell, they don’t care if they’re working politics on the government dime. It’s being forced to march in a parade on a saturday or lose your job that gets some people ticked.

    although this guy pretty clearly got his job based on politics, right?

    He’s a dem. maybe he was a pat quinn plant. :)


  44. - Smoggie - Monday, Feb 3, 14 @ 7:51 pm:

    Regarding confidentiality and whether this is a shake down or a settlement –

    It will depend on whether Rutherford has any proof as to who brought up confidentiality first.

    If the plaintiff’s counsel offers it up front, then she’s got ARDC issues (and maybe worse).

    Confidentiality is something that is almost always demanded by the defense and typically it has an extra cost. In fact, the settlement paperwork would need to establish confidentiality is a paid for term of the settlement (whether or not that’s true is another matter — often a dollar figure is reached and then part of it is allocated to confidentiality).

    While the clauses are routine (I tend to include them in just about any case I settle for a defendant unless the settlement is so low that it shows the case was frivolous) it is always the defense guy making the demand of confidentiality.

    When the plaintiff’s attorney demands it, all sorts of red flags go off.

    But again, this goes to proof. If it is simply Rutherford saying she offered it, and the plaintiff’s counsel saying that Rutherford demanded it, then it is not going anywhere.


  45. - Just The Way It Is One - Monday, Feb 3, 14 @ 7:59 pm:

    Oh boy, hate to just say it, but…this is gonna take Rutherford down this Election Cycle, ‘cuz it’s not so much who’ll be telling the truth right now–it’s just the nature of the alleGAtion that’ll prove too much of a taint on him, even it turns out to be utter nonsense eventually–because there won’t be enough time for DR to recover…!


  46. - Tony U - Monday, Feb 3, 14 @ 8:25 pm:

    - Capitol View - Monday, Feb 3, 14 @ 5:46 pm:

    every single politician gets this nonsense thrown at him. Jim Thompson got married as he campaigned for Governor or shortly after he won, but as a long term bachelor there were always whispers…

    I just want to say that things aren’t always “nonsense” to people in the know (EPU).


  47. - Bobo - Monday, Feb 3, 14 @ 8:39 pm:

    This is complete horse (you know what) Politically driven slurs timed perfectly to take a guy out. I really hope it back fires. It probably will if Rutherford just hangs in there.


  48. - The Historian - Monday, Feb 3, 14 @ 8:40 pm:

    I’m sorry, but I think this story has reached the point where it’s fundamentally unfair to Rutherford for Rich, among many others, to keep the supposed accuser’s name ’secret’ as privileged ‘private knowledge.’ Put it out there so that everyone has a better ability to judge just what’s really going on here, whether from Proft or others.


  49. - Percival - Monday, Feb 3, 14 @ 8:51 pm:

    “In the meantime, voters will obviously just have to decide for themselves as to whether they have concerns or not based on the facts that are revealed.” Wouldn’t the fact that the story came out of an opposition campaign be relevant to voters in deciding what is true and what is not? I suppose it could happen, but I doubt that this soap opera will be resolved by Primary Day, the voters will have to decide.


  50. - xxtofer - Monday, Feb 3, 14 @ 9:05 pm:

    I asked a friend who works in politics which was worse for Rutherford, to be semi-outed/rumoured or to be accused of the political/official misconduct. His answer — in the Republican world, it’s the former.


  51. - Bobo - Monday, Feb 3, 14 @ 9:12 pm:

    So on the day of the Presser Rauner says,

    “Treasurer Rutherford should spend his time answering the serious claims made against him by a state employee,”

    today he says “he doesn’t even know what the allegations are about..it’s silly”

    Obviously, he seems to have known more about this Friday than today


  52. - Anonymous - Monday, Feb 3, 14 @ 9:31 pm:

    =Wouldn’t the fact that the story came out of an opposition campaign be relevant to voters in deciding what is true and what is not?=

    Percival, I’m going to guess you already know the answer to that question. If not, just read it again and I’m sure you’ll figure it out.


  53. - Soccermom - Monday, Feb 3, 14 @ 10:16 pm:

    Okay. The Trib ran this guy’s name.
    http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2013-10-03/news/ct-met-des-plaines-police-harassment-lawsuit-20131004_1_lawsuit-sexual-harassment-sergeant
    And this woman’s name
    http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2013-11-08/news/chi-chicago-police-officer-says-sergeant-forced-her-to-have-sex-20131107_1_federal-lawsuit-civil-lawsuit-chicago-police-officer
    and this woman’s name
    http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2013-12-27/news/chi-south-side-alderman-files-lawsuit-alleging-extortion-20131227_1_alderman-anthony-beale-cps-officials
    and this woman’s name
    http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2013-08-23/entertainment/chi-deal-to-dismiss-paula-deen-sexual-harassment-discrimination-lawsuit-signed-20130823_1_paula-deen-bubba-hiers-plantation-themed-wedding
    Oh, you get the idea…


  54. - Anon - Monday, Feb 3, 14 @ 10:17 pm:

    Bobo,
    It wasn’t Rauner who said “Treasurer Rutherford should spend his time answering the serious claims made against him by a state employee”, it was a campaign spokesman. Two different people.


  55. - an innocent observer - Monday, Feb 3, 14 @ 10:17 pm:

    I’m definitly going to get some movie theater butter popcorn, a extra large coke, sit back and enjoy the show!


  56. - IbendahlLuvsJBT - Monday, Feb 3, 14 @ 10:25 pm:

    The accuser is reportedly in a whole lotta debt. Motive, anyone? http://www.chicagobusiness.com/article/20140203/BLOGS02/140209983


  57. - woodchuck - Monday, Feb 3, 14 @ 10:27 pm:

    Anon - Shrimpf is speaking for Rauner. That means he ostensibly had the comments vetted before he spoke them. Did Rauner refute Shrimpf? Oh yeah, today he did. He said he didn’t know about it. So his campaign mouthpiece says one thing and the candidate, with all of Kirk’s staff behind him, claims the spokesperson was wrong? The same Rauner who is going to run state government like a business? A business who says one thing on a Friday and different thing on a Monday? It doesn’t add up. If Rauner had said today that his spokesperson misspoke, it would have been okay. It would have allowed him to save face, but he didn’t. Saying nothing today said everything.


  58. - Rollo Tomasi - Monday, Feb 3, 14 @ 10:49 pm:

    Rauner is a very close friend of Rahm. He is pointers from the best.


  59. - Pot calling kettle - Monday, Feb 3, 14 @ 11:04 pm:

    I need to go to bed. This all seems to convenient (or inconvenient) and I’m having visions of some elaborate set up against Rutherford. I think I have seen too many episodes of Mission Impossible or House of Cards. My head is spinning and I need to walk away before I start making tinfoil hats.


  60. - Arthur Andersen - Tuesday, Feb 4, 14 @ 12:56 am:

    Pot, AA feels the same way. The House of Cards (show and grammatical versions) theme rings so true here.

    Just to get the pot stirring even better, the S-T leads tomorrow with two hits at BR and charters, including a blurb suggesting his dough helped keep UNO afloat while PQ had bricked their approps.


  61. - Juvenal - Tuesday, Feb 4, 14 @ 8:30 am:

    I highly doubt anyone was sexually harrassed by someone who attended their wedding.


  62. - Anonymous - Tuesday, Feb 4, 14 @ 6:47 pm:

    Are you basing that on an opinion, statistic, job, or payment, Juvenal? Or are you dropping crumbs that everyone’s already seen, but not willing to nibble on?


Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.


* About those new polls
* Today's number: 59 percent
* Yesterday's blog posts

Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...

...............

...............


Search This Blog...

Search the 98th General Assembly By Bill Number
(example: HB0001)

Search the 98th General Assembly By Keyword

          
        * How to burn movies to disc in an iDVD-less world
        * WSJ: No rush for Sprint, T-Mobile merger announcement due to its public nature
        * Samsung Galaxy Avant available from today, costs $216
        * Paranoid Android 4.5 Alpha 3: choose your Recents style
        * Square Reveals A Reader For Chip Payment Cards Ahead Of Coming U.S. Launch
        * The Week in iOS Accessories: Eight is enough?
        * Permanent 2 review: updated iPad spreadsheet gets more useful, less quirky

        * Teamreporter Builds Status Emails For You, Skips Time-Wasting Meetings
        * Different quarter, same story: Sprint customers flee as network construction grinds on
        * With Windows Phone 8.1 update, Cortana is going international
        * How to navigate the Facebook ad campaign maze: Part II
        * Nabi DreamTab HD8 Update Brings Android 4.4 And More (video)
        * Samsung Galaxy Avant For T-Mobile Announced
        * Deadspin Marshawn Lynch's Mom: "REPORTERS DON'T THINK, THEY GUESS" | Gizmodo Attack on Tor Has Likel

        * After trade deadline, newest White Sox may be old ones
        * White Sox cruise after thrashing Tigers in seventh
        * Noesi looks to wrestle win away from Tigers
        * White Sox 11, Tigers 4: Slugging Soria during seven-run seventh
        * White Sox cruise after thrashing Tigers in seventh
        * Stolen base overturned by Tigers' challenge
        * Rodon to be promoted to Class A on Wednesday


        Main Menu
        Home
        Illinois
        YouTube
        Pundit rankings
        Obama
        Subscriber Content
        Durbin
        Burris
        Blagojevich Trial
        Advertising
        Updated Posts
        Polls

        Archives
        July 2014
        June 2014
        May 2014
        April 2014
        March 2014
        February 2014
        January 2014
        December 2013
        November 2013
        October 2013
        September 2013
        August 2013
        July 2013
        June 2013
        May 2013
        April 2013
        March 2013
        February 2013
        January 2013
        December 2012
        November 2012
        October 2012
        September 2012
        August 2012
        July 2012
        June 2012
        May 2012
        April 2012
        March 2012
        February 2012
        January 2012
        December 2011
        November 2011
        October 2011
        September 2011
        August 2011
        July 2011
        June 2011
        May 2011
        April 2011
        March 2011
        February 2011
        January 2011
        December 2010
        November 2010
        October 2010
        September 2010
        August 2010
        July 2010
        June 2010
        May 2010
        April 2010
        March 2010
        February 2010
        January 2010
        December 2009
        November 2009
        October 2009
        September 2009
        August 2009
        July 2009
        June 2009
        May 2009
        April 2009
        March 2009
        February 2009
        January 2009
        December 2008
        November 2008
        October 2008
        September 2008
        August 2008
        July 2008
        June 2008
        May 2008
        April 2008
        March 2008
        February 2008
        January 2008
        December 2007
        November 2007
        October 2007
        September 2007
        August 2007
        July 2007
        June 2007
        May 2007
        April 2007
        March 2007
        February 2007
        January 2007
        December 2006
        November 2006
        October 2006
        September 2006
        August 2006
        July 2006
        June 2006
        May 2006
        April 2006
        March 2006
        February 2006
        January 2006
        December 2005
        April 2005
        March 2005
        February 2005
        January 2005
        December 2004
        November 2004
        October 2004

        Blog*Spot Archives
        November 2005
        October 2005
        September 2005
        August 2005
        July 2005
        June 2005
        May 2005

        Syndication

        RSS Feed 2.0
        Comments RSS 2.0
        WordPress

        Loading


        * If you want real ridesharing alternatives, veto.....
        * S. Raja Krishnamoorthi, President of Sivanantha.....
        * Gov. Pat Quinn: Reboot Illinois poll with huge .....
        * 10 Things to Know for Wednesday..
        * Quinn shrugs off ballot that put him behind..
        * Lawsuit against Quinn back in court in October..


        * Hearing delayed for Rock Island man in murder case
        * Charges upgraded to murder after Palatine fight
        * Illinois officials identify man killed by police
        * Illinois boy meets Coast Guard rescuers again
        * $1.2 million may go to family of teen shot by cop
        * Group files appeal in term limits decision
        * Chicago committee OKs naming plaza for ex-mayor
        * NCAA proposed settlement raises medical questions
        * Illinois to ask voters about taxing millionaires
        * Judge: Need more time to consider NCAA deal

        * Emails raise questions of politics in Quinn's anti-violence program
        * Quinn OKs ballot question on tax hike for incomes over $1M
        * Lawsuit against Quinn back in court in October
        * Illinois to ask voters about taxing millionaires
        * Illinois patients to docs: 'What about marijuana?'
        * Illinois State Fair manager fined by ethics commission for accepting free beer tickets
        * Sangamon County on its own for road salt
        * Sangamon County on its own for winter road salt
        * Lawyers will push to speed up pension reform ruling
        * Quinn says state EPA will block PCBs from Clinton landfill

        * CME buying 2 businesses in $655 million deal
        * Exelon buys Integrys unit, takes over Chicago power deal
        * These six numbers tell Tribune Publishing's future
        * Home theater rooms doing double duty
        * Regulators oust CEO, president of National Republic Bank


        * Man killed, two teens wounded in Near West Side shooting
        * Cheap shots  don’t help
        * Sanctions reject Putin’s meddling
        * City’s strict limits on medical marijuana sites go up in smoke
        * Berrios’ kin risk injury for right to crowd payroll: Mihalopoulos
        * Aldermen advance anti-sweatshop ordinance after awkward debate
        * Chicago telephone tax to rise by 56 percent to shore up pensions
        * Deadlocked committee delays vote on City Council budget analyst
        * 3 shot on Near West Side
        * Chicago cop wins $540K suit vs. sergeant accused of taunting him


        * Murder charges filed after man dies 10 days after Palatine beating
        * Man fatally shot by off-duty officer in Bucktown identified
        * Lawsuit: Plastic surgeon posted woman's photos, labeling them 'cocaine nose'
        * Cubs win longest game in team history
        * City Council showdown on watchdog power looms
        * City Council showdown on watchdog power looms
        * Man killed, 7 people hurt in shootings
        * Police: Teen flees Southwest Side kidnapping attempt
        * 3 rescued from Lake Michigan after storm overturns sailboat
        * Aldermen setting cannabis dispensary regulations


        * Authorities Investigating Downtown Bomb Threat
        * Authorities Investigating Downtown Bomb
        * Governor Approves 'Millionaire's Tax' As Advisory Referendum
        * Jane Byrne closer to getting memorial
        * Christian Co. Shooting Leaves Man Dead, Officer Wounded
        * Excavation Finds Courthouse Where Lincoln Worked
        * State Fair Officials Fined For Violating Gift Ban...For Beer Tickets
        * Inspector General Finds Old Metra Practice Could Lead To Fatigued Conductors
        * Exoneree Diaries: "You've got anger issues, Dad."
        * Clout On The Business Side of Medical Marijuana


        * Our Opinion: MacArthur Boulevard Association’s success worth replicating
        * Lawsuit against Quinn back in court in October
        * Quinn OKs ballot question on tax hike for incomes over $1M
        * Sangamon County on its own for road salt
        * Illinois State Fair manager fined by ethics commission for accepting free beer tickets
        * Me Inc. offers plenty of dividends
        * Quinn says state EPA will block PCBs from Clinton landfill
        * Regulators say Illinois doctor faked pot paperwork
        * Illinois communities scramble to find road salt
        * New law expands state Holocaust Commission


        * Aug. 1 college football chat
        * Who's next to commit?
        * SIU provost reassigned
        * 11 days to Camp Rantoul
        * Asmussen's Top 50: No. 11 Stanford
        * Daily business briefing: Hyundai recalling Sonata
        * Drier pattern continues across the Corn Belt
        * Marion officer alleges discrimination
        * Tom Bennett 7/30/2014
        * Quinn's action on landfill not enough, say local officials


        * New downtown Lombard businesses include jewelry store, salons
        * Twitter 2nd quarter results soar, stock flies high
        * Manager of home physician service accused of fraud
        * 5 food writers subpoenaed in ‘pink slime' lawsuit
        * U.S. mortgage applications index fell amid refinancing drop

        * Congressman Dan Lipinski to host 3 events ...
        * House passes Lipinski bill for Herbie John...
        * Renaming of Mount Greenwood post office in...
        * Rep. Lipinski's Bill Improving Internation...
        * Rep. Lipinski Announces $206428 Grant for ...
        * Rep. Lipinski's Bill Renaming Mount Greenw...
        * Dem Rep Brags He's Working With Obama To G...
        * Gutiérrez: 'I Think We Can Get 3 or 4, May...
        * Gutiérrez heads to White House to talk bor...
        * Obama flat wrong on trafficking law, says ...

        * Showdown looming in Congress over Web sale......
        * Walgreens Considers Moving Headquarters to......
        * Walgreens Considers Moving Headquarters to......
        * Walgreens Considers Moving Headquarters to......
        * Walgreens Considers Moving Headquarters to......

        * How Partisanship Could Save Iran Diplomacy......

        * GOP has midterm engagement advantage, but less than in 2010
        * Illinois values voters in a quandary over November gubernatorial election
        * The Cub Factor: Top 10 Reasons To Keep Watching
        * The Fantasy Fix 2014 Football Draft Guide Part 1: The Top 20
        * Top 10 Reasons To Keep Watching
        * Pension theft proving toxic to Illinois Democrats.
        * Ten minute drawing. Tenure.
        * Finding Jane's Place at Water Tower Park
        * An ethnic slur.
        * “Dr.” Terrence P. Carter. Arne Duncan’s superstar. The story the Chicago press won’t touch.


        * Pat Quinn’s Reality Check
        * Governor Quinn Signs Legislation to Give Public a Voice Regarding Millionaire Tax for Classroom Education - Law Establishes a Statewide Advisory Referendum on Nov. 4 Ballot
        * DOI Calls for Health Insurers to Bar Discrimination Based on Transgender Status or Gender Identity - Insurers Are Instructed to Remove Exclusions of Coverage Based on Gender Identity in Plans Offered Under ACA
        * Hoy Op-Ed on Immigration
        * Governor Quinn Reminds Drivers to Take Caution in Work Zones, Directs State Agencies to Redouble Efforts to Protect Public and Workers - Encourages Public to Increase Vigilance Following I-55 Tragedy




            Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller