SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      Mobile Version     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact
CapitolFax.com
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
Huge bipartisan majority for “voter suppression” proposal

Wednesday, Apr 9, 2014

* The House overwhelmingly passed House Speaker Michael Madigan’s proposal to prohibit voter discrimination

House Speaker Michael Madigan’s proposed constitutional amendment, which would be placed on the Nov. 4 ballot, says no person should be denied registration and voting rights based on race, color, ethnicity, gender, sexual orientation, religion, language or income.

The House sent the measure to the Senate on a 109-5 vote.

The measure seeks to counter a June 2013 U.S. Supreme Court ruling that dislodged part of the 1960s-era federal Voting Rights Act and prompted eight states to attempt to restrict access to polling booths, Madigan said.

”That has brought on legislation in other states that some of us would consider voter suppression,” Madigan said, pointing to how voter photo identification laws have disproportionately impacted minorities and the poor.

* This argument against the idea was totally bogus

State Rep. David Reis, R-Willow Hill, voiced concern that the push by Madigan was merely an attempt to short-circuit a move by GOP gubernatorial nominee Bruce Rauner to get his signature-driven, term-limits constitutional amendment on the fall ballot.

Some commenters have also repeatedly brought up this issue even though I’ve pointed out to them that they’re wrong. Nowhere in the Illinois Constitution are there limits to the number of popular initiatives. Legislative initiatives are limited

The General Assembly shall not submit proposed amendments to more than three Articles of the Constitution at any one election.

But that has zero impact on how many popular initiatives can be submitted to voters.

* Anyway, back to the debate

“The intent of this constitutional amendment is to provide in Illinois, constitutionally, that voter-suppression laws would not be permitted,” said Madigan, D-Chicago. “Some might say, ‘Well, today in Illinois, you don’t need this. Voter suppression wouldn’t happen in Illinois.’

“We don’t know that,” Madigan continued. “We don’t know what the future holds. What we do know is we can constitutionalize the protection of the right to vote.” […]

Reis, who voted against Madigan’s plan, also said there is no evidence Illinois is currently engaging in any form of voter suppression.

“This is a constitutional amendment in search of a problem,” Reis said.

On that point, Rep. Reis is probably more accurate.

* AP

Jim Durkin told The Associated Press on Tuesday the state party has “had an identity crisis for many years now.” He said he believes it’s important for people to know Republicans believe Illinois residents who are citizens should not denied the right to vote.

“Republicans, we’re going to win with addition,” Durkin said. “We need to dispel some of the notions that have been hanging over the GOP for years, that we’re a party of white suburban men. For me this was an easy decision.”

Discuss.

- Posted by Rich Miller        


30 Comments
  1. - Soccermom - Wednesday, Apr 9, 14 @ 10:52 am:

    Jim Durkin is doing a nice job.


  2. - Oswego Willy - Wednesday, Apr 9, 14 @ 10:55 am:

    Love the way Leader Durkin goes about his business, and trying to bring My Party back, by addition.

    I am a fan “too” Leader Durkin.

    Keep building and rolling.


  3. - Nearly Normal - Wednesday, Apr 9, 14 @ 10:58 am:

    Rich, when I read your headline I thought it meant that the majority were for voter suppression! Caught me there before my second cup of coffee and a reading of the item.

    If the Rauner initiative for a term limits amendment has enough signatures, it does not have to go through the General Assembly.

    I was thinking maybe Madigan was trying to keep the Fair Tax Amendment from passing and going on the November ballot.


  4. - Formerly Known As... - Wednesday, Apr 9, 14 @ 11:00 am:

    Madigan was asked during debate whether this would play any role in crowding other issues off the ballot, but the reporter who tweeted that did not tweet the Speaker’s reply.

    I assume it was in line with what Rich explained a few days ago concerning the difference between popularly proposed amendments and GA proposed amendments.


  5. - Formerly Known As... - Wednesday, Apr 9, 14 @ 11:01 am:

    correction: initiatives


  6. - wordslinger - Wednesday, Apr 9, 14 @ 11:02 am:

    –“Republicans, we’re going to win with addition,” Durkin said. “We need to dispel some of the notions that have been hanging over the GOP for years, that we’re a party of white suburban men. For me this was an easy decision.”–

    He gets it.


  7. - Barney - Wednesday, Apr 9, 14 @ 11:02 am:

    “Republicans, we’re going to win with addition,” Durkin said.

    says the guy who voted against the DREAM act and voted against marriage equality. ok…..


  8. - Wumpus - Wednesday, Apr 9, 14 @ 11:06 am:

    Is this really an issue?


  9. - jim - Wednesday, Apr 9, 14 @ 11:08 am:

    I don’t see this amendment as a big deal. People already have a constitutional right to vote.
    suspect something more is at play here, perhaps a Madigan effort to drive black turnout in Chicago by telling them that they can protect their threatened right to vote by passing this proposal and, at the same time, voting straight Democrat.
    If somebody has a substantive argument for this proposal, I’d like to hear it.
    It seems to me to be about as substantive as the proposed victims’ rights amendment that sailed through the House and will sail through the Senate and probably be overwhelmingly approved by the voters.


  10. - dupage dan - Wednesday, Apr 9, 14 @ 11:10 am:

    It ain’t an issue. Not in Illinois. It does, however, give Durkin an opportunity to keep spreading his mantra, the mantra that should be on the lips of every republican, every conservative, who wants the party to regain credibility and power. And he made use of the opportunity. signed, A Fan


  11. - John A Logan - Wednesday, Apr 9, 14 @ 11:11 am:

    If it were not an election year, this bill would have never got a moments attention or discussion. It’s a fluff measure, designed to provide Pat Quinn the ability to sign it into law with plenty of press tagging along, singing the praises of a meaningless bill, and enabling the power structure that has led the state down a destructive path.


  12. - Rich Miller - Wednesday, Apr 9, 14 @ 11:16 am:

    ===designed to provide Pat Quinn the ability to sign it into law with plenty of press===

    Oh, c’mon.

    Yes, it’s political. No doubt.

    But read the freaking Constitution. Governors have no say in these legislative constitutional amendments. If they get three-fifths in both chambers the amendments are sent to the voters.

    Ignorance is not bliss. And reading is not hard.


  13. - wordslinger - Wednesday, Apr 9, 14 @ 11:29 am:

    – It’s a fluff measure, designed to provide Pat Quinn the ability to sign it into law with plenty of press tagging along, singing the praises of a meaningless bill, and enabling the power structure that has led the state down a destructive path.–

    For crying out loud, read first, then comment.


  14. - Jeff Trigg - Wednesday, Apr 9, 14 @ 11:37 am:

    Lee v. Keith, 463 F. 3d 763 (7th Cir. 2006)
    “In combination, the ballot access requirements for independent legislative candidates in Illinois–the early filing deadline, the 10% signature requirement, and the additional statutory restriction that disqualifies anyone who signs an independent candidate’s nominating petition from voting in the primary–operate to unconstitutionally burden the freedom of political association guaranteed by the First and Fourteenth Amendments. Ballot access barriers this high–they are the most restrictive in the nation and have effectively eliminated independent legislative candidacies from the Illinois political scene for a quarter of a century–are not sustainable based on the state’s asserted interest in deterring party splintering, factionalism, and frivolous candidacies”.

    Voter discrimination and voter suppression? Michael Madigan had no problem illegally and unconstitutionally keeping independent candidates off the ballot for 25 years. As far as elections go, the only thing Michael Madigan believes in is that Democrat voters should be able to vote for Democrats.

    Besides, Madigan is wrong, voter suppression and discrimination IS happening in Illinois right now and has been for decades under his watch. 60% of GA races routinely go unopposed while independents and others face some of the harshest ballot access hurdles in the democratic world. Independents and others who don’t want to vote for Democrats or Republicans are being discriminated against and are having their votes suppressed, as the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals pointed out.

    The amendment isn’t a bad idea. No one, especially the media, should believe Madigan’s reasoning for this for one second, however, based on Madigan’s past record of voter suppression and discrimination against independents. Can’t anyone in the media ask Madigan if he really is doing this for the integrity of our elections, then why isn’t he doing anything about the 60% unopposed races and the discriminatory ballot access hurdles designed to keep independents and others off our ballots?

    It’d also be nice if the GOP in IL weren’t just like Madigan on this issue or didn’t have their heads up their a4$e$ regarding Article III, Section 3 of our state Constitution.


  15. - Formerly Known As... - Wednesday, Apr 9, 14 @ 12:08 pm:

    Durkin obviously does “get it”, even if this is a solution in search of a problem.

    To @Jeff Trigg’s point: This bill definitely falls short if we are talking about increasing access and participation. It is a defensive bill driven by election day politics and a moot point in Illinois rather than an offensive bill driven by a desire to make it easier to vote or get on the ballot.

    Even so, good stuff by Madigan, Durkin and company.


  16. - VanillaMan - Wednesday, Apr 9, 14 @ 12:49 pm:

    Naturally the GOP favor the bill. Anyone who knows the history of voter suppression recognizes that it wasn’t the GOP who passed and enforced the Jim Crow Laws, poll taxes and black voter suppression acts. We have nearly a century between the elections of the last African American US Senator, Republican Bruce in 1881 and the first African American US Senator, Republican Brooke in 1967.

    Since the removal of these voter suppression laws across the Southern States, voters began electing the GOP.

    So removing voter suppression laws is always a win for the GOP.


  17. - wordslinger - Wednesday, Apr 9, 14 @ 1:04 pm:

    –Since the removal of these voter suppression laws across the Southern States, voters began electing the GOP.

    So removing voter suppression laws is always a win for the GOP.–

    That’s quite a history lesson there, VMan.

    You can’t possibly believe any of that nonsense.

    It’s very true that Jim Crow was enforced by the old southern Democratic Party. When LBJ and northern Republicans like Ev Dirksen dragged them kicking and screaming into the light with civil rights legislation they abandoned the Democratic Party in droves and became…….. Republicans.

    Do you really think Strom Thurmond was singing “We Shall Overcome” when he flipped?

    Do you really think southern Republicans today are being elected on the strength of black votes?

    Are you on drugs?


  18. - Jorge - Wednesday, Apr 9, 14 @ 1:19 pm:

    “Since the removal of these voter suppression laws across the Southern States, voters began electing the GOP.”

    Then why is the GOP in some states quietly trying to bring back voter suppression laws?


  19. - John A Logan - Wednesday, Apr 9, 14 @ 1:21 pm:

    LOL. Forgive my overt offense to the elite for missing a point of process. So it’s sent to the voters….and not the Governors desk. I stand corrected. Ultimately it is a political stunt. That is all it is. So forgive me if I am not impressed by your hyperventilating over minutia.


  20. - Rich Miller - Wednesday, Apr 9, 14 @ 1:26 pm:

    ===So forgive me if I am not impressed by your hyperventilating over minutia. ===

    You based an entire comment on complete ignorance of your own state’s constitution - and on a subject that we’ve been discussing here for months.


  21. - VanillaMan - Wednesday, Apr 9, 14 @ 1:28 pm:

    You don’t see the abandonment of the Democrats in the South after the Civil Rights Acts - that is a nice myth. The South remained a Democratic stronghold for another generation of voters. It is the population growth of migrating northerners into the South that opens the door to the GOP for the first time.

    The idea that the Southern bigots became Republicans is a nice farce that is not backed up by facts. An easy glance at the federal and state elections across the Southern States easily reveals this.

    Voter suppression was a big problem when it was done successfully from 1876 to 1964 across the Southern US states. Nothing being suggested today remotely comes close.


  22. - wordslinger - Wednesday, Apr 9, 14 @ 1:33 pm:

    VMan, respectfully, your statements are insane.


  23. - CollegeStudent - Wednesday, Apr 9, 14 @ 2:03 pm:

    ===Naturally the GOP favor the bill. Anyone who knows the history of voter suppression recognizes that it wasn’t the GOP who passed and enforced the Jim Crow Laws, poll taxes and black voter suppression acts. We have nearly a century between the elections of the last African American US Senator, Republican Bruce in 1881 and the first African American US Senator, Republican Brooke in 1967.

    Since the removal of these voter suppression laws across the Southern States, voters began electing the GOP.

    So removing voter suppression laws is always a win for the GOP. ===

    “Voter ID, which is gonna allow Governor Romney to win the state of Pennsylvania, done,”

    -Mike Turzai, Pennsylvania House Majority Leader (Republican), 2012

    http://talkingpointsmemo.com/muckraker/pennsylvania-gop-leader-voter-id-will-help-romney-win-state


  24. - Conservative Republican - Wednesday, Apr 9, 14 @ 2:11 pm:

    So… given Madigan’s comments, does a constitutional amendment prohibiting discrimination against “voting rights” based on race, gender, etc. etc. bar the enactment of a voter ID law requiring a voter to present a photo ID at the polling place? Is that the intent of this amendment?

    Will simple poll watching now become “voter suppression”? Frankly, that is the opinion of many Democratic judges of election and precinct captains, who bleat “voter suppression” to poll watchers who ask questions at the polling place deemed legal for decades.


  25. - Formerly Known As... - Wednesday, Apr 9, 14 @ 2:15 pm:

    == Do you really think Strom Thurmond was singing “We Shall Overcome” when he flipped? ==

    Was Robert Byrd when he stayed? How about Fritz Hollings?

    Was Tim Scott when he was serving as the only black Senator in America for a while last year? The Republican who now happens to be 1 of only 3 black Senators, none of whom are female?

    Let’s face it: neither party, despite the rhetoric on both sides, has done nearly enough to ensure minority representation.

    And neither party can truly claim the moral high ground, no matter how hard one may try and claim it to be so. There were and still are plenty of examples to go around on both sides today, regardless of what some may say.


  26. - Demoralized - Wednesday, Apr 9, 14 @ 2:20 pm:

    ==bar the enactment of a voter ID law ==

    I think the Courts have been ruling more often than not against voter ID laws, as they should.


  27. - Upon Further Review - Wednesday, Apr 9, 14 @ 2:26 pm:

    I am still unaware of anyone being denied a ballot on the basis of sexual orientation. The inclusion of that language seems to be a gimmick meant to drive voter turnout in November.

    Deterring vote fraud is not voter suppression, but since Illinois is not cracking down on such activities or requiring voters to provide photo identification to request ballots, the entire amendment seems like overkill.

    Is the Illinois system of comparing handwriting against precinct registration records a form of suppression?


  28. - Formerly Known As... - Wednesday, Apr 9, 14 @ 2:55 pm:

    == enactment of a voter ID law ==

    The 24th Amendment, which abolished poll taxes, is viewed by many as compelling any state implementing voter ID laws to also offer a free voter ID. That is why many states requiring a photo ID, such as Georgia, and even those requiring a non-photo ID, such as Rhode Island, offer to provide such an ID free of charge.

    That is also why you may notice the resolution mentions, “No person shall be denied the right to register to vote or to cast a ballot in an election based on… income.”

    In simple terms, any voter ID law would almost certainly provide for a free ID. That applies yesterday, today, and tomorrow.


  29. - follies - Wednesday, Apr 9, 14 @ 4:36 pm:

    It’s actually not a fluff amendment. If a future general assembly tries to pass a law requiring voters to present identification at the polls, this will give them a cause of action to challenge the law, and quite possibly the ammunition to win. it might seem like a do nothing amendment, but it could come in handy in the future.


  30. - Upon Further Review - Wednesday, Apr 9, 14 @ 9:54 pm:

    What makes this amendment ridiculous is that the State is solidly blue for the foreseeable future. This is especially true of the General Assembly. The Democrats prepared the new map and the districts are pretty much fixed until 2022. So this begs the question as to what possible threat exists that the a reactionary new legislative majority is going to suddenly emerge and enact restrictive new voting laws within the next decade.

    If somehow, a future legislature enacted a law requiring photo identification of voters (which is required now for early voting), this amendment would not stop that, provided free i.d. cards were an option.


Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.


* More new TV ads
* Get ready for "Bloodtober"
* DCCC defies DC expectations, runs ad attacking Davis
* Today's assignment
* Rate Quinn's new ad: "Washington"
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Supplement to today’s edition: Crosstabs and TV ads
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today's edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)
* Good morning!
* Yesterday's blog posts

Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...

...............

...............


Search This Blog...

Search the 98th General Assembly By Bill Number
(example: HB0001)

Search the 98th General Assembly By Keyword

          
        * Brain Wars lets you challenge anyone to a brainy game
        * I just bought a one-year-old phone and it’s still better than anything else out there
        * Samsung’s new ad “note” a dig at Apple, “note”-iceably funny
        * Detailed Nexus 6 rumors attempt to confirm name, hardware specs
        * Apple Rubs Elbows With The Fashion Elite For Paris Apple Watch Event
        * GoPro outs new HERO 4
        * Exactly backwards: Apple's security statement is more a PR coup than a nightmare

        * “Where You Are Right Now Is a Necessary Step.”
        * Stripe Leads the Race to the $1 Trillion Future of Mobile Payments
        * How we built it: Tell your story to find funding and then stick with it
        * How to Tackle the Toughest Shipping Restrictions
        * Google’s modular phone will let you swap out parts without powering down
        * Matchstick, the Firefox OS-based Chromecast competitor, launches on Kickstarter for $18
        * Apple Avoided Billions in Taxes, European Regulator Says

        * Manager notes: How Robin Ventura and Chris Sale get along
        * Voting underway to decide Hank Aaron Awards
        * Development of young core in '15 can define Chicago's future
        * Improved White Sox take important step in 2014
        * September call-ups report card: position players
        * Ushering in the world after Paul Konerko
        * Classy to the end, Konerko waves farewell to stellar career


        Main Menu
        Home
        Illinois
        YouTube
        Pundit rankings
        Obama
        Subscriber Content
        Durbin
        Burris
        Blagojevich Trial
        Advertising
        Updated Posts
        Polls

        Archives
        September 2014
        August 2014
        July 2014
        June 2014
        May 2014
        April 2014
        March 2014
        February 2014
        January 2014
        December 2013
        November 2013
        October 2013
        September 2013
        August 2013
        July 2013
        June 2013
        May 2013
        April 2013
        March 2013
        February 2013
        January 2013
        December 2012
        November 2012
        October 2012
        September 2012
        August 2012
        July 2012
        June 2012
        May 2012
        April 2012
        March 2012
        February 2012
        January 2012
        December 2011
        November 2011
        October 2011
        September 2011
        August 2011
        July 2011
        June 2011
        May 2011
        April 2011
        March 2011
        February 2011
        January 2011
        December 2010
        November 2010
        October 2010
        September 2010
        August 2010
        July 2010
        June 2010
        May 2010
        April 2010
        March 2010
        February 2010
        January 2010
        December 2009
        November 2009
        October 2009
        September 2009
        August 2009
        July 2009
        June 2009
        May 2009
        April 2009
        March 2009
        February 2009
        January 2009
        December 2008
        November 2008
        October 2008
        September 2008
        August 2008
        July 2008
        June 2008
        May 2008
        April 2008
        March 2008
        February 2008
        January 2008
        December 2007
        November 2007
        October 2007
        September 2007
        August 2007
        July 2007
        June 2007
        May 2007
        April 2007
        March 2007
        February 2007
        January 2007
        December 2006
        November 2006
        October 2006
        September 2006
        August 2006
        July 2006
        June 2006
        May 2006
        April 2006
        March 2006
        February 2006
        January 2006
        December 2005
        April 2005
        March 2005
        February 2005
        January 2005
        December 2004
        November 2004
        October 2004

        Blog*Spot Archives
        November 2005
        October 2005
        September 2005
        August 2005
        July 2005
        June 2005
        May 2005

        Syndication

        RSS Feed 2.0
        Comments RSS 2.0
        WordPress

        Loading


        * Governor Pat Quinn TV Ad: "Washington"..
        * Clinton to stump for Illinois Gov. Pat Quinn..
        * Vallas Distances Himself from Rauner's Charter .....
        * Doctors Recommend IUDs for Teenage Girls, Paren.....
        * Ridesharing company Uber to expand in Chicago'..
        * Exclusive: Republican Mayor Gary Manier of Wash.....


        * Emanuel to city agencies: Up minimum wage to $13
        * O'Hare, Midway airports nearing normal capacity
        * Fire recovery beginning in downtown Rock Island
        * USDA: Illinois corn harvest continues lagging
        * Walgreen reports 4Q loss
        * Man killed in windshield tire crash identified
        * Boston City Council members weigh $25K pay raise
        * Durbin, Oberweis debate background checks for guns
        * GOP opposition to school funding bill irks Manar
        * Man accused of threatening university students

        * GOP opposition to school funding bill irks Manar
        * Durbin, Oberweis debate background checks for guns
        * Election 2014: Simon, Topinka spar over transparency, ethics in comptroller’s race
        * Statehouse Insider: There are a lot of campaign ads, in case you haven’t noticed
        * Quinn, Rauner address Illinois millennials
        * Burris an issue in Chicago trial
        * State schools seek carbon monoxide detectors
        * Ex-Sen. Ronald Burris an issue in Chicago trial
        * Gloria Steinem campaigns for Illinois Gov. Quinn
        * Flight disruption cancels Steinem stop with Quinn

        * Leo Burnett beefs up shopper marketing
        * Things are getting better at O'Hare, Midway airports
        * Walgreen sets record for yearly revenue
        * EBay to spin off PayPal
        * University of Chicago creates new training program for non-profit and government leaders


        * Vigil held for Skokie teens; two Niles North seniors shot, one killed
        * The thug life runs deep
        * Chicago shutdown will cost airlines ‘hundreds of millions’: analyst
        * Man accused in FAA fire made 'tragic mistake,' lawyer says
        * Shake-up at Robert R. McCormick Foundation
        * Church hosts woman fighting deportation
        * Hackers might have Jewel-Osco customers credit card data — again
        * Prosecution rests in Joliet double murder trial
        * Top cab official arrested in vehicle title laundering case
        * Uber forges ahead with 420-job expansion contingent on veto


        * Centralized dispatch system part of taxi reform proposal
        * Construction debris causes 'significant delays' on Blue Line
        * Lombard man killed when tire smashes through windshield in Wisconsin
        * Hot Doug's: The exit interview
        * Charges filed in slaying of mom and daughter, 7
        * Jewel-Osco hit again by data hack
        * Elgin cop fired after Facebook comment on Ferguson shooting
        * Police release photos of suspects in Gold Coast watch robbery
        * Police search Grayslake pond after woman reported missing
        * Man dead, 6 wounded in shootings since Monday


        * Effort Underway To Gauge Sangamon County Health Needs
        * Aramark, CPS change plan to cut school janitors
        * 3,000 fewer students enroll in Chicago Public Schools
        * Meet Bishop Blase Cupich, Chicago's incoming archbishop
        * Cupich to be next Chicago archbishop
        * Mary Todd Lincoln And Spiritualism
        * Retirement Plan At Center Of Dispute In Ill. Treasurer's Race
        * Rehabbing vacant buildings, and the lives of those who fix them
        * Pensions: Vexing Illinois Politicians Since 1917
        * Mike Lawrence: The Compelling Challenge Of Rehabbing Illinois


        * Our Opinion: Job creation is a health priority in Sangamon County
        * GOP opposition to school funding bill irks Manar
        * Durbin, Oberweis debate background checks for guns
        * David McSweeney: Pension cost shift would lead to higher taxes
        * Bernard Schoenburg: Rauner campaign uses Michigan firm for calls
        * Election 2014: Simon, Topinka spar over transparency, ethics in comptroller’s race
        * Statehouse Insider: There are a lot of campaign ads, in case you haven’t noticed
        * Statehouse Insider: There are a lot of campaign ads, in case you haven’t noticed
        * Our Opinion: Another day, another embezzlement — but why?
        * Andy Shaw: Illinois voters deserve straight talk from Quinn, Rauner


        * Snake Road migration attracts tourists
        * Illinois crop report 9-29-14
        * Effort seeks more rights for Illinois crime victims
        * Hatch campaign reduces TV advertising
        * State sells just two planes in bid to pare down fleet
        * Streator family's pumpkin is second biggest in world
        * Strawn’s fall art classes start soon
        * Daily business briefing: News Corp. buying online real estate business
        * IHSA officials won't attend Friday state legislature committee meeting
        * Flights still affected by Aurora fire


        * Political newcomer challenging Roskam for U.S. Congress seat
        * No injuries reported in Naperville fire late Monday
        * Secret Service director takes responsibility for White House breach
        * Halfway home, breaking down playoff possibilities
        * Afghanistan, US sign long-awaited security pact

        * Representative Jan Schakowsky Sends Letter...
        * Rep. candidate pushes to uphold marriage b...
        * Reps. Schakowsky and Waxman Introduce Bill...
        * Statement by Representative Jan Schakowsky...
        * FAA Rejects Call For New O'Hare Noise Stud...
        * Representatives Quigley, Duckworth, Schako...
        * Representative Jan Schakowsky Statement on...
        * Representative Jan Schakowsky Statement in...
        * U.S. House Passes Resolution Condemning An...
        * Representative Jan Schakowsky Statement on...

        * Durbin, Oberweis debate guns...
        * Durbin, Oberweis debate guns...
        * Durbin, Oberweis debate guns...
        * Durbin, Oberweis debate guns...
        * Durbin, Oberweis debate guns...

        * FAA Calls for 30-Day Review of Security Pr......

        * Are you ready for this week’s open house?
        * Morning Minute: Peoria market makes list of best fall housing markets for millennial buyers
        * More questions as flap over anti-Semitic professor percolates
        * New Obama EPA regulations mean higher energy prices for Illinoisans
        * Could the resume hold a candidate back?
        * Get out the Vote! Register to vote by the Oct. 7 deadline
        * Move, Inc. to be bought by News Corporation for $950 million
        * Kaifesh captures Illinois congressional endorsements
        * Pot.
        * Not my kids. Your kids.


        * Quinn must take lame duck tax vote off the table
        * Rauner hits Quinn on tax hike timing
        * Taxpayer Red Alert: Quinn Doubles Down on Lame Duck Tax Hike
        * Fact Check: Pat Quinn’s Most Desperate False Attack Yet
        * Rauner to Madigan: No lame duck tax hike after I win




            Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller