SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      Mobile Version     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact
CapitolFax.com
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
*** UPDATED x2 - Ives, Madigan in testy exchange *** Madigan moves non-binding minimum wage referendum to committee

Friday, May 16, 2014

* Sun-Times

House Speaker Michael Madigan plans Friday to push a plan to ask voters this fall to decide whether Illinois’ lowest-earning workers deserve an increase in pay. […]

Madigan’s legislation is posted for a Friday morning hearing in Springfield. Brown said a floor vote on the measure likely will come next week. […]

As much as Madigan is seeking input from voters on the question, his push also could help spur turnout in the Democratic Party base and help Quinn in what is a tight re-election bid against Bruce Rauner.

The referendum also keeps alive what key Democrats believe is a potent campaign weapon against Rauner, the multimillionaire private equity investor who has waffled on the question of whether to require employers put more in the pockets of Illinois’ lowest wage earners.

* Tribune

Under the measure, voters could voice their opinion on whether the minimum wage in Illinois for adults over the age of 18 should be raised to $10 an hour by Jan. 1. With the first-of-the-year trigger date, the referendum could place the matter on the legislative agenda in the post-election fall veto session, since it’s unlikely to pass before lawmakers go home at month’s end. […]

Democratic Sen. Kim Lightford of Maywood said approval of a referendum could help her bid to pass a minimum wage hike in the Senate, where she believes she is a couple of votes shy of the 30 needed to pass. The idea of a referendum gained currency as Madigan, who doubles as Illinois Democratic Party chairman, and U.S. Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill., suggested the issue should go before the general public to build support, Lightford said.

As we’ve discussed before, this is a “win-win” for Madigan and Senate President John Cullerton. They avoid a fight-to-the-death showdown with groups like the Illinois Retail Merchants Association, put Bruce Rauner on the spot by making this a campaign issue and maybe gin up a little turnout in November.

*** UPDATE 1 *** From Dave McKinney…


*** UPDATE 2 *** Both unclear on the concept. Sun-Times

Madigan got into a testy exchange with one Republican on the panel, state Rep. Jeanne Ives, R-Wheaton, who opposes his plan and justified her position from observations she collected as a tax preparer for eight years.

“I can assure you that I have done a number…of tax returns for people at the bottom and when it’s all said and done — when you take into account all the public benefits they’re receiving — they receive an inordinate amount, well over their amount in earned income, in benefits back from the government,” Ives told Madigan. “There is a safety net already in place, and I personally think this is…anti-business.”

Madigan appeared to grow angry at Ives’ statement.

“I don’t think you should use the word ‘inordinate’ when you’re talking about people who are on government benefits. They don’t want to be on government benefits. They want a job where they can earn a living, support their family, live a nice life. So please,” Madigan continued, his voice rising, “don’t use the word ‘inordinate’ when people are on government benefits. They don’t want to have the benefits.”

Madigan missed Rep. Ives’ point. She was talking about the working poor, not the unemployed. Notice Ives mentioned “earned income.”

But Ives also missed the point. Those workers are on government benefits because they don’t make much money. And so those government benefits are acting as a direct subsidy of the businesses which employ workers at sub-par wages and don’t offer full-time employment. Ives is basically arguing to continue that government subsidy.

- Posted by Rich Miller        


61 Comments
  1. - Arizona Bob - Friday, May 16, 14 @ 9:03 am:

    Smart politics w/no downside for the Dems.

    Anyone doubt that MJM will have people out in low income areas telling them if they vote for wage increase (and Dems, of course) they’ll actually be getting big raises?

    You KNOW that’s going to be happening, and Illinois voters are notorious for voting themselves what they THINK is free money without caring about the consequences.

    That’s what keeps the Dems in power (along with GOP political ineptitude).


  2. - Anon - Friday, May 16, 14 @ 9:04 am:

    Illinois political gamesmanship at its finest.

    We deserve exactly what we get.


  3. - Oswego Willy - Friday, May 16, 14 @ 9:05 am:

    Turnout, and controlling a turnout, that is a huge factor here to move a small bit of numbers.

    If successful in getting this on the ballot is a help needed.

    The ILGOP needs to drive their controlled turnout, not just put stuff out there…in hopes…to drive a turnout for My Party.


  4. - Barney - Friday, May 16, 14 @ 9:13 am:

    So if you are a dem, the good news is you finally got something right. The bad news, it’s a non-binding referendum.


  5. - Stones - Friday, May 16, 14 @ 9:15 am:

    I wonder what % of the electorate will understand this this is a non-binding referendum?


  6. - Grandson of Man - Friday, May 16, 14 @ 9:17 am:

    “We deserve exactly what we get.”

    Some of us would like the minimum wage increase to pass now and have no politics played over the issue. That apparently won’t happen.

    If the ultimate goal is to pass a minimum wage increase, and it can’t be passed now, why not try to milk some political gain out of it?


  7. - Wensicia - Friday, May 16, 14 @ 9:19 am:

    Bruce Rauner should fully support this; he wants everything else decided by voter referendum.


  8. - countyline - Friday, May 16, 14 @ 9:27 am:

    Stop playing games. If you want it, have the courage of your convictions and lets see a bill.


  9. - Oswego Willy - Friday, May 16, 14 @ 9:28 am:

    ===You KNOW that’s going to be happening, and Illinois voters are notorious for voting themselves what they THINK is free money without caring about the consequences.

    That’s what keeps the Dems in power (along with GOP political ineptitude).===

    Example?

    If Illinois voters are so notorious, it should be quite easy.


  10. - Demoralized - Friday, May 16, 14 @ 9:39 am:

    @Arizona Bob:

    You never fail us with your partisan ranting.

    And it’s not free money you dope. It’s a WAGE. You know, something people WORK for.

    Besides, it’s a referendum. That’s it. Enough with your fake outrage.


  11. - Ahoy! - Friday, May 16, 14 @ 9:42 am:

    If this is a good idea, than wouldn’t it also be prudent to put the income tax sunset on the November ballot was well?


  12. - Louis G. Atsaves - Friday, May 16, 14 @ 9:45 am:

    Democrats guffawed when Rauner suggested a non-binding referendum on gay marriage. They thought Rauner’s position was spineless. Now Democrats want a non-binding referendum on the minimum wage?

    GUFFAW!


  13. - Arizona Bob - Friday, May 16, 14 @ 9:48 am:

    @Dem
    =And it’s not free money you dope. It’s a WAGE. You know, something people WORK for.=

    Ok, JERK, how much of this increase for private sector workers will come from the GAs budget? ZERO! How much will come out of minimum wage workers taxes to pay for this? LESS THAN ZERO!

    So it’s FREE for the pols and FREE MONEY to low income workers to pay for it.

    A raise without improvement of skill or productivity is not EARNED, Dem. It’s either extorted through unions or the political process, or UNEARNED.

    Ever hear about what’s called an unconscionable contract, Dem? It’s a contract where one party gets something for nothing, and is often overturned in court if challenged. This raise is “something for nothing” so it certainly fits the bill.


  14. - A guy... - Friday, May 16, 14 @ 9:49 am:

    In some cases people will have an opportunity to kill their own jobs. Evil genius at work.


  15. - Anon - Friday, May 16, 14 @ 9:52 am:

    If a referendum was appropriate for marriage equality, as Bruce Rauner claims, then why not for the minimum wage?


  16. - wordslinger - Friday, May 16, 14 @ 9:54 am:

    I’m with Louis. Dems shouldn’t duck the issue or play it for politics.

    Unless you don’t believe in any minimum wage laws at all, an increase is obviously in order.

    Taxpayers are spending billions subsidizing low-wage employers through SNAP, CHIP, Medicaid and EITC.


  17. - Oswego Willy - Friday, May 16, 14 @ 9:55 am:

    ===A raise without improvement of skill or productivity is not EARNED, Dem. It’s either extorted through unions or the political process, or UNEARNED.===

    “Extorted”?

    You do realize if the wage does go up, no company is required to have employees? If a company can afford 10 employees now, and if a non-binding referendum puts a company at 7 employees at the “new wage”, companies will do what is in their best interest…So…

    Where is this “Extortion”? lol

    Your talking points need to match the ISSUE, that would be a swell change.


  18. - Walker - Friday, May 16, 14 @ 9:56 am:

    No Louis G Atsalves: These are two different types of issues.

    The minimum wage issue is not a civil rights issue, as usually understood.

    The problem with referenda on civil rights issues in general, is that they are meant to protect the rights of minorities in society — to decide them on simple majority votes of the general public seems obviously off base. They are better handled by statute by representative legislatures, and courts.


  19. - Demoralized - Friday, May 16, 14 @ 9:57 am:

    @word:

    Exactly. The same people that complain about raising the minimum wage are the same people that complain about government programs like those you mentioned. It’s hypocrisy at it’s finest.


  20. - DuPage Dave - Friday, May 16, 14 @ 10:01 am:

    Can we have a non-binding referendum on sending Bob back to Arizona? Just wondering….


  21. - Wumpus - Friday, May 16, 14 @ 10:02 am:

    Geniusness, that is why he is Speaker Palpatine.


  22. - Arizona Bob - Friday, May 16, 14 @ 10:07 am:

    @OW
    Pretty simple. Willie.

    For years Illinoisans elected a GA and Governor who gave out far more in public pension benefits than the tax base would allow, thinking they were “taking care of” public workers for “free”. Ever since Edgar this wasn’t true. Voters should have known it wasn’t sustainable and affordable, but they kept ramping up benefits with the people they elected anyway. They thought they were getting it for “FREE” and kept electing the sellout pols of both parties. Foolish, but consistent. If they were told they would have to “pay as they go”, my guess is that spending would have been less or different people would be elected. Illinois voters chose to live in a fool’s paradise giving out these “free” benefits.

    For years Illinoisans wanted to increase education funding “for the children” and set quietly by as public teacher salaries, benefits and pensions went through the roof. They chose not to believe that inflating education spending per pupil at twice the rate of inflation was somehow happening without requiring them to pay higher state and local taxes. They thought all those unnecessary salary and benefit escalations and excessive overbuilding of schools would somehow be paid off with “free” money from other than their pocket books (state or Federal) and kept electing people to the GA and school boards who continued the insanity until it became a crisis. Now we spend about the 14th highest amount among states in the nation, and pay the 12th highest teacher salaries, yet our student performance is middle of the pack, at best, with similar to national demographics. Once again Illinois voter thought they were getting something for free…..and were WRONG!

    Want more examples? We can get into Medicaid expansion, Prevailing wage and project labor agreements ripoffs and just about everything done in the City of Chicago.

    Need I go on?


  23. - Anon - Friday, May 16, 14 @ 10:08 am:

    “If the ultimate goal is to pass a minimum wage increase, and it can’t be passed now, why not try to milk some political gain out of it? ”

    I agree.

    You can also favor banning same sex marriage. Why not try to milk some political gain out of that to? How about undocumented immigrant amnesty? Banning abortion?

    So many things we can hold non-binding referendums on in order to get the vote out!


  24. - Walker - Friday, May 16, 14 @ 10:16 am:

    ===Illinois voters are notorious for voting for themselves what they THINK is free money, without caring about the consequences.===

    Agreed.

    Exactly the same thing occurs with many (not all) who support drastic cuts to what they pay in taxes. More money for them without concern for the overall consequences.

    I don’t think this describes the minimum wage increase well at all. That would not directly and positively impact most of those who would vote for it.


  25. - Grandson of Man - Friday, May 16, 14 @ 10:17 am:

    “A raise without improvement of skill or productivity is not EARNED, Dem.”

    No one person has sole ownership of what is defined as “earned.” Right now, most voters agree that the minimum wage should be increased, therefore they think the workers earned it.

    “It’s either extorted through unions or the political process, or UNEARNED.”

    Extortion is a crime. Collective bargaining and giving money to politicians for desired policies are legal. Opponents of minimum wage increases and unions also spend money and use their influence to “extort” politicians to do what they want.


  26. - Oswego Willy - Friday, May 16, 14 @ 10:18 am:

    ===For years Illinoisans elected a GA and Governor who gave out far more in public pension benefits than the tax base would allow, thinking they were “taking care of” public workers for “free”.====

    And…

    ===…They thought all those unnecessary salary and benefit escalations…===

    Those wedging of talking points, lol

    “Teachers! Teachers pay! Unions and benefits”…

    ===Your talking points need to match the ISSUE, that would be a swell change.===


  27. - olddog - Friday, May 16, 14 @ 10:23 am:

    @ AZ Bob — When, exactly, was it that “teacher salaries, benefits and pensions went through the roof?” I guess I was too busy grading papers to notice it.


  28. - dupage dan - Friday, May 16, 14 @ 10:31 am:

    Besides, it’s a referendum.

    Yep, nothing to see here - just a non-binding referendum. Doesn’t mean a thing - we’re just messing around - doing the whole civil government education thing. It’s just practice. Move along.

    It’s a political ploy. Plain and simple. Gin up the vote. Talking points. It’s politics. It ain’t just a referendum.


  29. - dupage dan - Friday, May 16, 14 @ 10:40 am:

    === No one person has sole ownership of what is defined as “earned.” Right now, most voters agree that the minimum wage should be increased, therefore they think the workers earned it ===

    In a capitalist economy, it’s the market that sets the costs of goods and services & wages, etc. When gov’ts get into that business, it can cause problems. Command economies are unwieldy at best, harmful at worst. We have seen the loss of low skill labor jobs over the years as many of these functions are automated, in part to control labor costs. Low wage service/fast food jobs now may well be subject to some automation. Maybe those folks who lose their jobs taking orders at a McDonalds can get a job as a material handler at US Steel. Oh, wait…. never mind.

    Best way to raise your income? Stay in school, get your HS diploma, get some training in the skilled trades or work your way thru college on the pay as you go 6 year plan - or get another job. Tried and true strategy practiced by recent immigrants to this country for well over 100 years. It ain’t fair, it ain’t easy - nor should it be.


  30. - wordslinger - Friday, May 16, 14 @ 10:50 am:

    Is the United States a “command economy,” DD? What are you talking about?


  31. - anon - Friday, May 16, 14 @ 11:01 am:

    No one seems to have mentioned Ives criticized the woman testifying about how difficult it is for her to live on the current minimum wage. Showed just how out of touch Ives with average people.


  32. - Grandson of Man - Friday, May 16, 14 @ 11:05 am:

    “In a capitalist economy, it’s the market that sets the costs of goods and services & wages, etc.”

    In a first-world country, there is no such thing, nor should there be a such thing, as a pure free market economy. People have the right and exercize the right to regulate markets.

    I don’t want to live in a country without any free market regulation.

    “When gov’ts get into that business, it can cause problems.”

    That can happen, as can the lack of government getting into business. Collective bargaining has helped millions of workers over the years. Having a minimum wage sets a barrier against total worker exploitation. Why have a minimum wage at all? Some people would like to squeeze every drop of labor out of workers and pay them as little as possible.

    No individual owns the ability to determine what are fair wages. The market plays a large role in determining them, and citizens who participate in the political process also have a role. Right now, most voters consistently support a minimum wage increase. That means that millions of people agree that certain workers deserve a small raise.

    The question I have is does Madigan have the votes to pass the increase now? I’m not sure he does. I would like it to pass now and not play political games.


  33. - bigdaddygeo - Friday, May 16, 14 @ 11:10 am:

    It should be binding and go into effect on January 1.


  34. - FormerParatrooper - Friday, May 16, 14 @ 11:14 am:

    I agree the minimum wage should be increased. How much I don’t know. There are pros and cons to everything.

    I also agree with grandson of a man that government does have a role in this. I also personally believe it is a small role.

    If the Democrats really believe that they are doing this to help the economy and the people of Illinois they should not wait for a politically expedient time for elections but to do it now while they are in session.


  35. - A guy... - Friday, May 16, 14 @ 11:34 am:

    === Walker - Friday, May 16, 14 @ 9:56 am:

    No Louis G Atsalves: These are two different types of issues.

    The minimum wage issue is not a civil rights issue, as usually understood.====

    I’ve come around to the idea that Gay Marriage was well debated and have no problem with it becoming enacted law; with or without a referendum. People had plenty of opportunity to make their voices heard. A whole lot of people were elated and those who weren’t for it shouldn’t have seen any material change in their lives. I still don’t believe for a minute that this was a Civil Rights issue, because it wasn’t. Doesn’t really matter, other than calling it that is incorrect and it would redefine Civil Rights from something far different than what they truly were. Let’s agree that it’s good that gay marriage has been passed. Sorry about the tangent, but I objected to it then and I object to it now.


  36. - A guy... - Friday, May 16, 14 @ 11:41 am:

    The minimum wage should be revisited every session as the economy ebbs and flows in regular cycles. It would be less of a political football if it were dealt with as a matter of course. God forbid if there were ever a strong case for it to go down based on economic numbers. It should have parity with the Federal minimum wage (not the same! parity!)This whole notion of having to “catch up” with huge jumps (over a buck and a half an hour x employees x hours) is devastating to big and small business. It takes away any incentive for any employer to offer a raise not knowing what’s coming. People will overwhelmingly vote for a higher minimum wage. Like these legislators, there’s no risk to you when your spending other people’s money. Or is there, and we’re experiencing it and don’t know it?


  37. - dupage dan - Friday, May 16, 14 @ 11:51 am:

    === Is the United States a “command economy,” DD? What are you talking about? ===

    Perhaps you are a little rusty on history, word. Nixon put wage and price controls on the economy back in the 70s. There is an example of a command economy action. I wasn’t saying that such an economy exists today, did I? I merely said that such activity doesn’t work very well - and there is history to prove it. Does a simple minimum wage hike equate to a command economy? Likely more on the micro level than a macro level but it is debatable as to whether or not it will have the effect intended by those pushing for the hike.


  38. - wordslinger - Friday, May 16, 14 @ 12:04 pm:

    DD, you need to look up “command economy.” Regulation does not equal communism.


  39. - countyline - Friday, May 16, 14 @ 12:54 pm:

    “Madigan continued, his voice rising, “don’t use the word ‘inordinate’ when people are on government benefits. They don’t want to have the benefits.”

    They don’t want to have the benefits…now THAT’S funny. Try making them work for those benefits, and listen to them scream that that isn’t fair…


  40. - Demoralized - Friday, May 16, 14 @ 12:55 pm:

    Rep. Ives provided a prime example for the statement I made about wages and government benefits. Those opposed to raising wages for the working poor are also the same people that complain the loudest about government benefits? Inordinate benefits Rep. Ives? Really? Simply a despicable thing to say.


  41. - Demoralized - Friday, May 16, 14 @ 12:56 pm:

    ==Try making them work for those benefits==

    Bought into that tired talking point hook, line and sinker haven’t you. Saying something over and over doesn’t make it true. But keep up that pathetic narrative.


  42. - countyline - Friday, May 16, 14 @ 1:01 pm:

    While it is a noble cause, it demonstrates a lack of understanding of simple economics. Raise the minimum wage, employer costs go up, employer costs go up, prices go up, prices go up, the income level at which one qualifies for welfare also goes up, so those same people stay on welfare.


  43. - countyline - Friday, May 16, 14 @ 1:05 pm:

    Its not a narrative Dem, its a fact, otherwise we would be doing it. It used to be that most people would work three jobs in order to avoid asking for handouts, not they go straight to the handout without thinking about it. I may be over simplifying it, but you are certainly ignoring the fact that those people exist.


  44. - Demoralized - Friday, May 16, 14 @ 1:11 pm:

    @countyline:

    A lot of people getting those benefits are working. I know a few people who get LINK. None of them want it and all of them work - at least one works two jobs. It’s not right or fair to categorize these people as not working because most do. It’s a sad state of affairs when you work and still need assistance. That’s why we need an increase in the minimum wage.


  45. - wordslinger - Friday, May 16, 14 @ 1:16 pm:

    –Try making them work for those benefits, and listen to them scream that that isn’t fair…==

    Tell us more, professor. Only people who don’t work receive government benefits?

    SNAP, EITC, Medicaid, and CHIP are huge subsidies for low-wage employers.

    Forbes reports that WalMart employees receive $6.2 billion a year in public assistance. Fast-food industry employees receive $7 billion in public assistance, with $1.2 billion of that going to McDonald’s employees alone.

    http://www.forbes.com/sites/clareoconnor/2014/04/15/report-walmart-workers-cost-taxpayers-6-2-billion-in-public-assistance/


  46. - olddog - Friday, May 16, 14 @ 1:18 pm:

    === I may be over simplifying it, but … ===

    Yep.


  47. - countyline - Friday, May 16, 14 @ 1:29 pm:

    - but you are certainly ignoring the fact that those people exist-

    yep.


  48. - wordslinger - Friday, May 16, 14 @ 1:31 pm:

    LOL, Countyline apparently agrees with himself!

    Dude, quoting yourself in a second post doesn’t reinforce your point.


  49. - wordslinger - Friday, May 16, 14 @ 1:41 pm:

    Countyline, since you’re a scholar on those who receive government benefits, I’m sure you’ll find this link old news.

    http://www.cbpp.org/cms/?fa=view&id=3677


  50. - Yellow Dog Democrat - Friday, May 16, 14 @ 1:58 pm:

    I call Shenanigans!

    Honestly, how many of the working poor have a tax accountant?

    My mom spent a weekend at the dining room table every year.

    SHENANIGANS!


  51. - wordslinger - Friday, May 16, 14 @ 2:04 pm:

    –Reagan strongly supported the Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC), which sends checks to Americans who work but earn less than around $46,000 a year, depending on family size. Recipients of the credit are among those who don’t pay income tax, but Reagan never regarded that as a problem. His administration estimated that the 1986 reform of the tax code would remove 6 million working poor from the tax rolls. Reagan called the reform a “sweeping victory for fairness” and “perhaps the biggest antipoverty program in our history.”–

    Milton Friedman turned Reagan on to the EITC. I guess those guys would be RINOS in some circles today.

    http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2012-09-19/reagans-workers-are-romneys-47-percent-takers


  52. - siriusly - Friday, May 16, 14 @ 2:20 pm:

    I would never want my tax preparer to make any public statements or judgements about what they learned about my finances. I think Ives’ statements are invasive and presumptive.


  53. - siriusly - Friday, May 16, 14 @ 2:21 pm:

    But as a GOTV tactic, I think the referendum on minimum wage is a good one for the Dems.


  54. - dupage dan - Friday, May 16, 14 @ 2:40 pm:

    It’s a spectrum, word. On one end is capitalism, on the other communism. It isn’t like a light switch is turned on or off. It’s a continuum. At what point does regulation invade every economic decision that is made? It would be nice if everything was black and white, night and day - but it isn’t.

    But back to the point of this post. A political stunt to gin up support for the November ticket. With MJM in command. What would that be? A command government?


  55. - Walker - Friday, May 16, 14 @ 2:44 pm:

    Ives just made the best argument for raising the minimum wage, and doesn’t even know it.

    Almost one-half of the adult homeless we serve in the N and NW suburbs of Chicago are currently working minimum wage jobs. Many of their employers know that they can pay extremely low wages and still get employees, because the taxpayers are providing their employees government assistence.

    Is this how we want it all to work? We want the taxpayers to subsidize business profitability through wage support?

    General economic theories can be true and helpful, but often don’t work well at the margins of the real world market. This level of minimum wage is beyond the margin for our economic system to work well.


  56. - wordslinger - Friday, May 16, 14 @ 2:46 pm:

    DD, it’s not a spectrum, but whatever.


  57. - countyline - Friday, May 16, 14 @ 3:11 pm:

    Clearly when one has no legit argument to the contrary, they result to insults…right Word ?


  58. - Yellow Dog Democrat - Friday, May 16, 14 @ 3:12 pm:

    BTW, if Ives thinks the EITC is too generous, she should take that up with her caucus. Every EITC expansion I recall in Illinois has had strong bipartisan support.


  59. - Ahoy! - Friday, May 16, 14 @ 3:32 pm:

    Some on here assume that businesses can just increase their wages, but there are those who can not. Its not fair to lump small independent businesses in with the Wal-Marts of the world (and to some extend the McDonald’s but a lot of those are franchises). What happens when some of those jobs just disappear because the business closes down? We’ll end up losing our small businesses and creating more big business that can cash flow through it.

    Also, there’s plenty of jobs out there that can be filled with certificates and minimal training. Why not focus our efforts on workforce development? Or at the very least lets differentiate between big businesses with CEO’s that make 1,000 times more than the average worker and and the small business where a minimum wage increase will cost the businesses entire profits.


  60. - wordslinger - Friday, May 16, 14 @ 3:39 pm:

    Ahoy, there are a number exemptions to the minimum wage.

    http://www.dol.gov/whd/minwage/q-a.htm


  61. - Yellow Dog Democrat - Friday, May 16, 14 @ 4:34 pm:

    @Ahoy!

    Would love to focus on workforce development.

    Unfortunately, Republicans want to cut state spending too.

    Would love to reign in tax brakes for big corporations, but every time we do, the GOP and business lobby accuse us of chasing businesses out of Illinois. And they hide behind small businesses and “family farmers” to do it.

    Heck, I’d settle for having those CEOs pay their fair share in income taxes, but according to the GOP, that makes me a socialist.

    Someone pick a lane, please.


Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.


* Rauner oppo watch
* Zorn nails it again
* *** UPDATED x1 *** If at first you don't succeed...
* Lower ratings for ABC 7 debate
* Question of the day
* Bloomberg to spend $1.9 million on Dold
* Stand down... mostly
* BLS: A strong couple of months
* *** UPDATED x1 *** SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Fundraising reports by targeted legislative districts
* Rate Sheila Simon's new TV ad
* Poe set to begin transplant process, faces "extended" recovery
* Rauner runs new TV ad touting newspaper endorsements
* *** UPDATED x2 - "Comical" - "No interest" *** Despite shout-outs, Neely says she and Rauner haven't talked
* Grimm on 150 - Minimum wage battles in other states - The return of "Matt the Welder" - Rauner on "right to work"
* A bevy of new congressional TV ads
* Quinn tax hike dodge count: 4
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Supplement to today’s edition: Crosstabs, cable TV buys, ads
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today's edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)
* Today's number: 165
* A grand good morning to you all!
* Yesterday's blog posts

Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............


Search This Blog...

Search the 98th General Assembly By Bill Number
(example: HB0001)

Search the 98th General Assembly By Keyword

          
        * Moto 360 wireless charging dock now available on Google Play
        * Verizon HTC One M8 will likely get EYE Experience update tomorrow
        * Android 4.4W.2 update starts rolling out to Moto 360 and more, brings many enhancements
        * Apple breaks records, Nexus Ambient Display, Microsoft Lumia & more – Pocketnow Daily
        * HERE beta version now available for other Android devices
        * HTC EYE update rolls out for T-Mobile One M8, Verizon tomorrow
        * iPad Air 2 Review: The Best Tablet Available, Now More Portable And Powerful

        * Penball Erasers Let You Have an Impromptu Game of Foosball
        * Apple Pay Found To Be Usable In Overseas With Some Tweaking
        * Apple Pay Rewards Program To Launch This Holiday Season [Rumor]
        * Maps Connect Web Portal Helps To Make Apple Maps More Accurate
        * Oppo N3 Teased Again On Facebook, Shows Off Fingerprint Scanner
        * Onyx Smartwatch Will Use An E-Ink Display For Better Battery Life
        * iPad Air 2′s A8X Chip Found To Be Of The Triple-Core Variety

        * World Series Game 1: Notes and discussion
        * The e-gus off-season plan
        * Reading Room: A wild card of a World Series
        * Following same path as '59 White Sox, KC eyes title
        * larry's Offseason Plan
        * Abreu wins Sporting News' AL Rookie of the Year honors
        * Jose Abreau wins the Sporting News AL Rookie of the Year


        Main Menu
        Home
        Illinois
        YouTube
        Pundit rankings
        Obama
        Subscriber Content
        Durbin
        Burris
        Blagojevich Trial
        Advertising
        Updated Posts
        Polls

        Archives
        October 2014
        September 2014
        August 2014
        July 2014
        June 2014
        May 2014
        April 2014
        March 2014
        February 2014
        January 2014
        December 2013
        November 2013
        October 2013
        September 2013
        August 2013
        July 2013
        June 2013
        May 2013
        April 2013
        March 2013
        February 2013
        January 2013
        December 2012
        November 2012
        October 2012
        September 2012
        August 2012
        July 2012
        June 2012
        May 2012
        April 2012
        March 2012
        February 2012
        January 2012
        December 2011
        November 2011
        October 2011
        September 2011
        August 2011
        July 2011
        June 2011
        May 2011
        April 2011
        March 2011
        February 2011
        January 2011
        December 2010
        November 2010
        October 2010
        September 2010
        August 2010
        July 2010
        June 2010
        May 2010
        April 2010
        March 2010
        February 2010
        January 2010
        December 2009
        November 2009
        October 2009
        September 2009
        August 2009
        July 2009
        June 2009
        May 2009
        April 2009
        March 2009
        February 2009
        January 2009
        December 2008
        November 2008
        October 2008
        September 2008
        August 2008
        July 2008
        June 2008
        May 2008
        April 2008
        March 2008
        February 2008
        January 2008
        December 2007
        November 2007
        October 2007
        September 2007
        August 2007
        July 2007
        June 2007
        May 2007
        April 2007
        March 2007
        February 2007
        January 2007
        December 2006
        November 2006
        October 2006
        September 2006
        August 2006
        July 2006
        June 2006
        May 2006
        April 2006
        March 2006
        February 2006
        January 2006
        December 2005
        April 2005
        March 2005
        February 2005
        January 2005
        December 2004
        November 2004
        October 2004

        Blog*Spot Archives
        November 2005
        October 2005
        September 2005
        August 2005
        July 2005
        June 2005
        May 2005

        Syndication

        RSS Feed 2.0
        Comments RSS 2.0
        WordPress

        Loading


        * Chicago 'Street Team' has your back..
        * Former President Clinton campaigns for Gov. Quinn..
        * Sick passengers from Liberia arrive at O'Hare -.....
        * Fans flock to Wrigley Field to see historic tea.....
        * Joliet adopts ‘Cupcake Law’..
        * Former President Clinton stumps for Quinn, Durbin..
        * Early voting signals beginning of end for elect.....
        * Sick passengers from Liberia arrive at O'Hare..
        * Study finds drugs still in recalled supplements..
        * Naperville police seeking man who met up with 1.....


        * Family, friends remember women slain in Indiana
        * Indiana man was violent long before 7 killings
        * Family, friends remember women slain in Indiana
        * Indiana man was violent long before 7 killings
        * Police: Indiana man confesses to all 7 killings
        * Expert: PTSD could be factor in activist's past
        * Former President Clinton stumps for Quinn, Durbin
        * Ballot error stops early voting in Rockford again
        * Ebola causing spike in demand for hospital gear
        * State: Jimmy John's founder owes taxes on planes

        * Rep. Raymond Poe to undergo stem cell transplant
        * Bill Clinton campaigns for Quinn, Durbin
        * Quinn, Rauner spar over jobs, taxes
        * Election 2014: Learn about all the candidates
        * What to watch for in third governor debate tonight
        * U of I sees turning point as election nears
        * Chicago Sun-Times endorses Rauner for governor
        * Sun-Times, Belleville, Champaign, Peoria newspapers endorse Rauner for governor
        * Bill Clinton to address workers at pro-Quinn rally
        * Body camera use concerns Illinois police officers

        * What's next for Tribune, Sun-Times in burb paper deal
        * Chicago heating bills will be significantly lower (if winter cooperates)
        * Chicago heating bills will be far lower (if winter cooperates)
        * Walgreen seeks to seal parts of former CFO's lawsuit
        * Big-biz group a big Mike Madigan donor


        * Sparse crowd at CPS HQ before Board of Ed vote on Hancock school
        * Indiana officials identify fourth body found after arrest of suspected serial killer
        * Jail guard smuggled weed in sandwiches, feds say
        * Father Bob Botthof, teacher who became priest after losing wife, dies at 85
        * Back to the past with mayor’s move
        * Court officials suggest ISIS wannabe could be released from jail on bond
        * Tentative deal at U of I hospital averts threatened nurses’ strike, union says
        * Unemployment rates fall in 31 states, including Illinois
        * Dr. Lawrence Solomon: Renowned dermatologist, book collector loved a mystery
        * Emanuel’s cable tax hike to cost average consumer $28.80 a year


        * Two injured in Warrenville car crash
        * Public weighs in on Museum Campus plan
        * Waukegan schools remain closed Wednesday
        * 2 from Liberia screened for Ebola in Chicago after falling ill
        * At least 5 people wounded in shootings since Tuesday evening
        * Man dies 5 months after Southwest Side shooting
        * Naperville police ask for help locating "person of interest"
        * Inquiry broadens into suspect in Indiana serial killings
        * Emanuel set to outline re-election agenda with five speeches
        * Cook County Jail guard, inmates charged in drug smuggling


        * Business Report: Former Restaurant Near Statehouse Up For Auction; Downtown Springfield Inc. Update
        * 13th Dist. Candidates Talk NAFTA, Ebola During Springfield Debate
        * Lincoln Legacy Lecture Series To Focus On "Lincoln's Funeral"
        * Small Campaign Contributions Amount To Chump Change
        * Civic Fed: Lawmakers Once Again Taking Illinois Down Bad Budget Path
        * Cheddar's Leaves Springfield WUIS-SJR Business Report
        * Area Cub Scouts Burned In Explosion
        * Notes On The Final Governor Debate
        * Task Force Hopes To Help Turn Students Into Good Citizens
        * Digging up the history of a Civil War camp on Chicago's South Side


        * Our Opinion: Choice for Illinois comptroller comes down to experience
        * Rep. Raymond Poe to undergo stem cell transplant
        * Bill Clinton campaigns for Quinn, Durbin
        * Joanna McQuillan Weeks: Cheese balls deserve more respect
        * Our Opinion: White, Madigan for another term
        * Quinn, Rauner spar over jobs, taxes
        * Our Opinion: Say yes to Magro’s project
        * John Schick: Letter confirmed aggression toward bicyclists
        * Election 2014: Learn about all the candidates
        * U of I sees turning point as election nears


        * Week after 6-year low, gas price relief evaporates
        * Mount Zion rebrands for updated outlook
        * Promoters ink three-year deal for Street Machine Nationals
        * Candidate visits depot on home stretch to election
        *
        * Fishing holes in Southern Illinois? Not a problem
        * Callis, Davis weigh in on Ebola, other matters
        * Volleyball team eyes lofty goals
        * Golf team finishes fourth
        * Abrams preps for surgery


        * Girls swimming: Tuesday's results
        * Girls volleyball: Tuesday's results
        * Boys soccer: Tuesday's results
        * Schaumburg turns back Glenbard North
        * CCIW lead on the line

        * Patrick Cannon defense strategy rare but n...
        * Feds fine Jesse Jackson Jr.'s campaign com...
        * Ex-Congressman Jesse Jackson Jr. faces sen...
        * Representative Jan Schakowsky Sends Letter...
        * Rep. candidate pushes to uphold marriage b...
        * Reps. Schakowsky and Waxman Introduce Bill...
        * Statement by Representative Jan Schakowsky...
        * U.S. House Passes Resolution Condemning An...
        * FAA Rejects Call For New O'Hare Noise Stud...
        * Representatives Quigley, Duckworth, Schako...

        * Clinton campaigns for Quinn, Rauner campai......
        * Clinton campaigns for Quinn, Rauner campai......
        * Topic matches for political scandals...
        * Topic matches for political scandals...
        * Clinton campaigns for Quinn, Rauner campai......

        * Suspected Serial Killer Used Online Advert......
        * Obama Might Try To Circumvent Congress On ......
        * Congress Can Stop Obama’s Iran Appeasement......
        * Report: Obama Looking to Suspend Iran Sanc......
        * Former FAA security chief: More screening ......

        * Rauner’s Neely talk not as first seems
        * Because it was awesome.
        * Waukegan’s school board president speaks. Crazy talk.
        * New Bost ad hits Illinois 12th Congressional District [video]
        * Batinick says Dunn's desperate campaign charges are "ridiculous"
        * Topinka says reducing income tax would cause a heart attack to the state
        * Early Voting Halted in Winnebago County, Illinois Due to Ballot Mistake
        * Illinois Supreme Court Candidate Exposes Members of Shadowy Political Group
        * Illinois Supreme Court Candidate Under Attack by Shadowy Political Group
        * Bustos and Illinois Dems attempt to paint Schilling as "pro-rape"


        * New TV Ad: Endorsed
        * Governor Quinn Statement on Positive Economic News - Illinois Led the Midwest in Job Creation in September and Had Second Best Growth in Nation; Unemployment Rate Has Dropped More Than Any Other State in the Last Year
        * Rauner Campaign Statement on Final Debate
        * What They’re Saying About Pat Quinn
        * What They’re Saying About Bruce Rauner




            Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller