SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      Mobile Version     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact
CapitolFax.com
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
Spread it out, lower the rates

Friday, Jul 18, 2014

* Bruce Rauner’s “plan” to lower income taxes and kinda sorta replace a few dollars of them with a new sales tax on services is part of a pattern among Republican governors. Here’s a New York Times story from January of 2013

Republican governors are moving aggressively to cut personal and corporate income taxes, including proposals that would increase reliance on state sales taxes, setting up ambitious experiments in tax reform that could shape what is possible on a national level. […]

In Louisiana, Gov. Bobby Jindal is pushing to repeal the state’s personal and corporate income taxes and make up the lost revenue through higher sales taxes. Gov. Dave Heineman of Nebraska iscalling for much the same thing in his state. Gov. Sam Brownback of Kansas wants to keep in place what was supposed to be a temporary increase in the state sales tax to help pay for his plan to lower and eventually end his state’s income tax.

Along the way these governors are taking small first steps into a debate over what kind of tax system most encourages growth in a 21st-century economy. In particular they are focusing attention on the idea, long championed by conservatives but accepted up to a point by economists of all stripes, that the economy would be better served by focusing taxation on consumption rather than on income.

Taxing consumption has the potential to lift economic growth by encouraging more savings and investment. But the shift could also increase inequality by reducing taxes predominantly for the wealthy, who spend a smaller share of their income than middle- and lower-income people.

“The question of whether we should tax income or whether we should tax spending is really a proxy for a different debate,” said Joseph Henchman, vice president for state projects at the Tax Foundation, a conservative-leaning research organization. “Everyone agrees we’ll get more growth with consumption taxes. It’s just that some people prioritize fairness.”

If you “encourage more savings and investment” through taxation, then how does that inject any demand into the economy? Demand drives growth. By their own logic, they’d drive consumption down, which would decrease demand, which would decrease growth.

* More

For Mr. Jindal and other Republican governors who are considering a presidential run in 2016, there are obvious political benefits to having a robust income tax-cutting record to present to conservative primary voters.

But Democrats say the approach would lead to cutbacks in education, health care and other vital services while shifting relatively more of the tax burden to those who can least afford it.

“These aren’t pro-growth policies — they’re shell games that reward the wealthiest Americans at the expense of everyone else,” said Danny Kanner, a spokesman for the Democratic Governors Association.

Cutting a billionaire’s income taxes while raising sales/service taxes on the broader economy would indeed help that billionaire.

* Even so, I generally favor broader taxation at lower rates. Rauner’s service tax idea is just a first step. It could be broadened much further to take advantage of that sector’s historic annual growth. But that ought to be accompanied by a lower sales tax rate. It doesn’t have to be revenue neutral, but people should be given a break overall.

* And the same goes for income taxes. According to the Civic Federation

The individual income tax base is expected to grow at a rate of only 1.9% compared to the retirement income growth rate of 6.5%. […]

The Illinois Comptroller estimates that this exemption of federally taxable retirement income reduced the State’s individual income tax revenues by $2.0 billion in FY2012.

So, what does Illinois do? It taxes slow-growth individual income at 5 percent and doesn’t tax high-growth retirement income at all. That doesn’t make sense.

Spread it out, lower the rate.

Easier said than done, of course. Retirees by definition have a lot of extra time on their hands for things like screaming at their legislators.

* But, if anyone has any real guts, they might wanna challenge the constitutionality of this retirement income exemption. From the Constitution

A tax on or measured by income shall be at a non-graduated rate. At any one time there may be no more than one such tax imposed by the State for State purposes on individuals and one such tax so imposed on corporations.

We’re only supposed to have one personal, non-graduated income tax rate for individuals in Illinois, but we actually have two, and one of them is decidedly graduated (at the rate of zero).

/rant

- Posted by Rich Miller        


42 Comments
  1. - SAP - Friday, Jul 18, 14 @ 12:25 pm:

    At the risk of sounding like a class warrior, Illinois seniors get a couple big tax breaks, just for being old. To wit: Retirement income is not taxed at all in Illinois and senior homestead exemptions give seniors huge property tax breaks. Neither of these breaks are based on need or ability to pay, they are just examples of pandering to people who vote. As a result, the rest of us pay higher taxes.


  2. - The Doc - Friday, Jul 18, 14 @ 12:31 pm:

    Amen, Rich.

    Brownback’s experiment in Kansas has been an epic failure, so much so that a stable full of state GOPers have endorsed his Dem opponent - who also happens to be leading in the polls.

    In Kansas.

    That’s why it’s encouraging to see Rauner at least float the concept of slaying a few sacred cows, even if it’s accompanied by some cowardly and unsound recommendations meant to soften the political blow.


  3. - Esteban - Friday, Jul 18, 14 @ 12:35 pm:

    Is Rauner really a billionaire or is this merely
    hyperbole from Camp Quinn? I’ve been under the
    impression that he is NOT.


  4. - Bill White - Friday, Jul 18, 14 @ 12:35 pm:

    === If you “encourage more savings and investment” through taxation, then how does that inject any demand into the economy? Demand drives growth. By their own logic, they’d drive consumption down, which would decrease demand, which would decrease growth. ===

    This is the crux of the debate. The current generation of GOP politicians deny that demand is relevant and say Keynes has been proven wrong.


  5. - john - Friday, Jul 18, 14 @ 12:41 pm:

    Rich - Spreading it out and lowering the rate may work with sales tax and capital gains, but when it comes to income it doesn’t work and here is why: http://acivilamericandebate.com/2011/04/10/the-30-year-growth-of-income-inequality/

    The Civic Committee points out that retirement income grows faster than wage income. That is only when you count all wage earners. If you eliminate the bottom 99% of wage earners, you see income growth rates in the 6-8% range and even higher for those with the highest incomes.

    If we use the Civic Committee’s same theory - tax the highest growing sectors of income in the state. The real income growth in the country and the state is all in the top 0.5% of income earners. If we tax everyone at the same rate for their income we are actually hurting poorer families because their incomes have been shirking over time. To capture the revenue that the state needs, higher income individuals should pay higher tax rates and lower income people should pay lower income tax rates.


  6. - Concerned - Friday, Jul 18, 14 @ 12:43 pm:

    Bill White is right. The Republican notion that more lower taxes = more investment = growth ignores that (1) there is a record amount of cash on corprate balance sheets–sitting idle becuase no capital investments are worth making with demand so low; (2) more savings and investments will produce more idle cash. Go back to step one. We need to focus on creating more demand.


  7. - Rich Miller - Friday, Jul 18, 14 @ 12:45 pm:

    === To capture the revenue that the state needs, higher income individuals should pay higher tax rates===

    OK, but you gotta amend the Constitution to do that. Good luck with that impossible climb.


  8. - Chris - Friday, Jul 18, 14 @ 12:49 pm:

    “The Civic Committee points out that retirement income grows faster than wage income. That is only when you count all wage earners. If you eliminate the bottom 99% of wage earners, you see income growth rates in the 6-8% range and even higher for those with the highest incomes.”

    What if you eliminate the bottom 99% of retirees? What is the growth rate of retirement income for the 1% of retirees?

    I bet its a LOT higher than 6-8%.

    Give retirees a $30k exemption, tax everything above that as OI. Done.


  9. - john - Friday, Jul 18, 14 @ 12:51 pm:

    Rich - I wasn’t saying it was probable. I was extrapolating a theory based on the Civic Committee’s theory.


  10. - Fed up - Friday, Jul 18, 14 @ 12:57 pm:

    I’m all for broadening the sales tax, I doubt that lowering the income tax to 3% is a good idea with states debt and pension issues. Quinn refuses to increase revenue through gambling or oil production so taxes are all that’s left. Well, maybe a back sale


  11. - Norseman - Friday, Jul 18, 14 @ 1:03 pm:

    === The individual income tax base is expected to grow at a rate of only 1.9% compared to the retirement income growth rate of 6.5%. […] ===

    It would have been nice if they had sourced these numbers. I’d have to see it from a creditable source before accepting this statement as fact.

    In reviewing the CF article, I found it interesting that they suggest exempting the first $50,000 of retirement income from taxation. To me this suggests a graduated income tax which I thought was verboten to the business types.

    The discussion regarding the fairness of exempting retirement income from the income tax is appropriate. [Although selfishly I’d like to keep the current system.] Shifting the majority of the tax burden from income to sales taxes is not appropriate. Sales taxes in general are regressive.

    With respect to Rich’s suggestion of a lawsuit regarding the retirement income exemption, it would be an interesting case. I suspect the retiree response is that the State has the right to exempt a class of persons by the type of income, but it can’t exempt persons by how much of a taxable income they make.


  12. - Chris - Friday, Jul 18, 14 @ 1:03 pm:

    Fed up: “Well, maybe a [bake] sale”

    PQ can get the Cupcake Girl to do it! At $3/cupcake, that’s only about 10,000 cupcakes for every single person in the state, and we’d be in good shape!

    Uhoh–that probably violates the Cupcake Girl regulation exemptions. Back to the drawing board!


  13. - MrJM (@MisterJayEm) - Friday, Jul 18, 14 @ 1:07 pm:

    Is Rauner really a billionaire or is this merely hyperbole from Camp Quinn? I’ve been under the impression that he is NOT.

    The watch and Carhartt are working!

    – MrJM


  14. - Chris - Friday, Jul 18, 14 @ 1:08 pm:

    Norseman: “It would have been nice if they had sourced these numbers. I’d have to see it from a creditable source before accepting this statement as fact.”

    I’ll bet you a dollar that a big piece of that difference in growth is bc of the approaching first wave of baby boomer retirements–if the working age population is flat, but retiree population growing by ~4%, then that’s basically the difference between the growth in “base”, right?


  15. - Chris - Friday, Jul 18, 14 @ 1:09 pm:

    “The watch and Carhartt are working!”

    If you count the $19 for the watch, I think it puts him over the Billion mark. But he’s depreciated it now.


  16. - Grandson of Man - Friday, Jul 18, 14 @ 1:19 pm:

    I absolutely support a tax on my retirement income in Illinois. I support pension reform and didn’t even mind the possibly-illegal reform that is in court. It’s a progressive reform, and I support it because I think it will do the state tremendous good. These things are less of a big deal to me compared to other things like collective bargaining rights and tax fairness–but that’s just me.

    “The real income growth in the country and the state is all in the top 0.5% of income earners. If we tax everyone at the same rate for their income we are actually hurting poorer families because their incomes have been shirking over time.”

    This is why I don’t support totally getting rid of income taxes and substituting them for service taxes. That’s an ALEC-type of model, and politicians like Gov. Nikki Haley and Gov. Brownback of Kansas are ALEC-type of politicians. This model seems to be meant to divest certain wealthy entities of as much tax liability as possible.

    States that have higher income taxes than us seem to be doing okay, so these are tax models that rebut the ALEC-type models.

    I support paying the current income tax and also having a “millionaire surcharge” type of tax, so that our taxes can be more in line with other “high-growth” states, i.e. states with progressive income taxes and higher top tax rates.


  17. - bored now - Friday, Jul 18, 14 @ 1:25 pm:

    ah, balancing these state budgets on the backs of poor people. how noble! but at least they won’t complain (or vote), right???

    i guess if lincoln was alive today and gave the gettysburg speech, republican governors (and candidates) would insist that he say, “government of the rich, by the rich and for the rich”…


  18. - Andrew Szakmary - Friday, Jul 18, 14 @ 1:33 pm:

    I think Illinois should tax retirement income. The only caveat is that, almost by definition, retirees are very likely less tied to the state than working people with jobs. Tax them too much, and a not insignificant portion of them may move out of state. On those who do, you also lose the property tax, sales tax, gas tax revenue, etc. If retirement income is taxed, I think the amount of the exemption (if any) should be carefully studied, because the revenue-maximizing amount for state and local government combined may not be zero.


  19. - PublicServant - Friday, Jul 18, 14 @ 1:35 pm:

    Illinois currently has only one rate on taxable income. An exemption for retirement income is not a second rate of zero. Go ahead and sue. The Supremes will spank you very much.


  20. - PublicServant - Friday, Jul 18, 14 @ 1:37 pm:

    Grandson of Man has it right.


  21. - Rich Miller - Friday, Jul 18, 14 @ 1:37 pm:

    ===An exemption for retirement income is not a second rate of zero===

    The Supremes have knocked down other exemptions as being so high that they amount to graduated. So, I think it’s possible.


  22. - Anonymous - Friday, Jul 18, 14 @ 1:37 pm:

    Tax my retirement income and I leave the state. No reason to stay, and others will follow.


  23. - Ghost - Friday, Jul 18, 14 @ 1:38 pm:

    So let’s exempt income of less then 1 million, and tax everyone with 1 mil or over at the single rate of 8%


  24. - Rich Miller - Friday, Jul 18, 14 @ 1:39 pm:

    Ghost, read my previous post. You can’t do that here.


  25. - Anon - Friday, Jul 18, 14 @ 1:49 pm:

    “If you “encourage more savings and investment” through taxation, then how does that inject any demand into the economy? Demand drives growth. By their own logic, they’d drive consumption down, which would decrease demand, which would decrease growth.”

    This also why income inequality matters.

    “We rich people have been falsely persuaded by our schooling and the affirmation of society, and have convinced ourselves, that we are the main job creators. It’s simply not true. There can never be enough super-rich Americans to power a great economy. I earn about 1,000 times the median American annually, but I don’t buy thousands of times more stuff. My family purchased three cars over the past few years, not 3,000. I buy a few pairs of pants and a few shirts a year, just like most American men. I bought two pairs of the fancy wool pants I am wearing as I write, what my partner Mike calls my “manager pants.” I guess I could have bought 1,000 pairs. But why would I? Instead, I sock my extra money away in savings, where it doesn’t do the country much good.”

    Read more: http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2014/06/the-pitchforks-are-coming-for-us-plutocrats-108014_Page3.html#ixzz37qbZu0SU


  26. - Chris - Friday, Jul 18, 14 @ 1:50 pm:

    “Tax my retirement income and I leave the state.”

    As everyone (rightly) says to the bozos like Jimmy John whats-his-name: Don’t let the door hit you.


  27. - steve schnorf - Friday, Jul 18, 14 @ 1:52 pm:

    norseman, try COGFA for the income tax growth rate here in Illinois


  28. - Norseman - Friday, Jul 18, 14 @ 2:17 pm:

    Unless I’m misunderstanding tax law, income generated in the state is taxed regardless of where you live. As a state pensioner, I can’t run away to avoid an Illinois income tax.


  29. - forwhatitsworth - Friday, Jul 18, 14 @ 2:29 pm:

    I think Chris at 1:50 would eventually eat his words. I would predict thousands of retirees, including myself would be gone fast enough that the door wouldn’t have a chance to hit me (in the ass)if retirement income is taxed which removes a major incentive to stay. Simple economics.


  30. - PublicServant - Friday, Jul 18, 14 @ 2:44 pm:

    Before we leave, however, we’ll vote.


  31. - Dan Johnson - Friday, Jul 18, 14 @ 2:47 pm:

    Is Norseman right? That’s a really important question — does a Florida resident collecting an Illinois public pension pay Illinois income tax (if we didn’t exempt retirement income)? I thought you only pay based on the state where you live not on where the income is generated, but if Norseman is right, then the single biggest concern about not taxing retirement income disappears. Any experts willing to educate?


  32. - Michelle Flaherty - Friday, Jul 18, 14 @ 3:27 pm:

    Where will you go? Indiana? Indiana taxes retirement income. Most states with taxes do.


  33. - kimocat - Friday, Jul 18, 14 @ 3:39 pm:

    No Norseman is not right. You pay state tax where you live, not where your check comes from. I live out of state and pay my state’s income taxes on a portion of my Illinois pension.


  34. - JS Mill - Friday, Jul 18, 14 @ 3:40 pm:

    If a person receives a Illinois public pension but is the resident of another state they are not taxed in Illinois. Martire has it right, tax pension income over $75,000, 1% tax on services, reduce property tax by 25%. Martire has always had it right which is precisely while the politicians have not listened. For those who will move if retirement income is taxed I would say that I am sorry to hear that. I think once you add up the costs of moving and what the real costs of living in another state are it will not be worth it. If the numbers are there I would question what you might be moving too. I am not looking to run people off, just a reasonable level of taxation to support the public services. That leads to the debate on what those should be and the need to control our legislatures addiction to creating new programs (without consideration of funding).


  35. - Dan Johnson - Friday, Jul 18, 14 @ 3:56 pm:

    Thanks


  36. - Anonymous - Friday, Jul 18, 14 @ 4:02 pm:

    Michelle Flaherty, Do some research. There are states out there that do not tax retirement income. Florida and Nevada are 2, out of about 10.


  37. - Michelle Flaherty - Friday, Jul 18, 14 @ 4:41 pm:

    The key words being “most states”


  38. - Just the Facts - Friday, Jul 18, 14 @ 4:46 pm:

    Technically, retirement income is not exempted, it is subtracted from federal adjusted gross income in determining taxable income. It is one of many distractions granted to both individuals and corporations. As I recall, it was included in the original 1969 income tax act. From a legalleg it is no more vulnerable to legal challenge than any of the other distractions.

    I believe it should be eliminated, but I am of the opinion that legislation will be required as a court challenge would not succeed.


  39. - Just the Facts - Friday, Jul 18, 14 @ 4:48 pm:

    Spell check seems to want to change subtraction to distractions


  40. - Norseman - Friday, Jul 18, 14 @ 4:51 pm:

    I’m pretty sure I’m right. If you have income derived from Illinois, you get taxed no matter where you live. Goggle it.

    Also, remember that this is a hypothetical talking about taxing retirement income in Illinois. I know it’s not done now, but if so you can’t escape that tax by moving if your retirement income comes from Illinois.


  41. - Chris - Monday, Jul 21, 14 @ 6:29 pm:

    “I think Chris at 1:50 would eventually eat his words.”

    Why would I care? I’m not retired–I’d rather live in a state where the political will slants in favor of the working man, and against the retiree. Once I retire, my interests will flip.

    All you retirees had the ‘advantage’ of a state that didn’t pay it’s bills while you are working, and now that the bill is due, want to not have to pay anything.

    Note: I have exactly *zero* relatives older than me living in Illinois.


  42. - Chris - Monday, Jul 21, 14 @ 6:35 pm:

    Norseman:

    “I’m pretty sure I’m right. If you have income derived from Illinois, you get taxed no matter where you live.”

    I had always had the same thought, but someone here cited to a federal statute that states the contrary. But I can’t find it now…will try again, tho.


Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.


* Emanuel accepts Rauner's apology, but with a catch
* Trade secrets or hiding payrollers?
* *** UPDATED x1 - 34 Latin Kings charged *** US Attorney to announce "significant new indictments against numerous alleged gang members"
* Question of the day
* Caption contest!
* Rauner is gearing up
* Convention delegates are "not normal" party members
* I'll believe it when I see it, Lisa
* SIU's two crucial mistakes
* Sandack says no "compromising information" was accessed
* *** UPDATED x2 - VIDEO: Kennedy looked horrible *** Chris Kennedy speaks to Dems, flees without talking to reporters
* G: Blagojevich doesn't deserve leniency
* *** LIVE COVERAGE *** Democratic National Convention
* Yesterday's blog posts

Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............
<


Search This Blog...

Search the 98th General Assembly By Bill Number
(example: HB0001)

Search the 98th General Assembly By Keyword

  
* Motorola monthly security patches dropped for “efficient” bundles
* Real trainers don’t Pokemon Go without a little Willow in their pocket
* Xiaomi Mi 4i explodes at Indian workplace, off the charger
* Best office apps
* Moto G4 and G4 Plus Review: A spectrum of budget options
* [TA Deals] Save 48% on a bone conduction Bluetooth headset
* The Ticwatch 2 is a crowdfunded twist on Android Wear

* Chris Sale apologizes to teammates and fans, doubles down against m...
* Saladino extends White Sox magic vs. Cubs
* Third straight walk-off fuels White Sox mojo
* Saladino extends White Sox magic vs. Cubs
* Melky robs Bryant of HR with riveting catch
* Shields faces Cubs as Chapman joins rivalry
* Saladino extends White Sox walk-off magic vs. Cubs

...............


Main Menu
Home
Illinois
YouTube
Pundit rankings
Obama
Subscriber Content
Durbin
Burris
Blagojevich Trial
Advertising
Updated Posts
Polls

Archives
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005

Syndication

RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0
WordPress

Loading


* Rauner calls for Illinois term limits, redistri.....
* Union leader calls Rauner a 'jackass,' vows to .....
* Kennedy rips Rauner, ducks questions on whether.....
* Democrats Call For Sen. Durbin To Run For Gover.....
* Durbin won't rule out challenging Rauner for Go.....
* Convention could start 2018 Dem race for govern.....
* Rauner-created business development group gets .....
* Bruce Rauner Reignites His Push for Term Limits.....


* Court finds man charged in drive-by competent to stand trial
* Illinois won't release details of 'Chicago Fire' tax credits
* 6-year-old Chicago girl home after shot in stomach
* Excerpts from recent editorials in newspapers in Illinois
* Witness shot before murder trial to testify when it resumes
* Illinois won't release details of 'Chicago Fire' tax credits
* Chicago commuter trains expanding service for Lollapalooza
* Trial delayed for 6 suspects in Williston heroin overdoses
* EXCHANGE: Business leaders work to spur entrepreneurship
* Illinois announces proposed waterfowl season, bag limits

* High-profile Republican state lawmaker abruptly resigns
* High-profile GOP Illinois lawmaker Sandack suddenly resigns
* 2 efforts in Illinois attempt to change sex offender laws
* Rauner renews call for term limits
* Rauner-created business development group gets new name
* State costs for amendment notices likely to top $2 million
* Rauner OKs regulating police use of cell-site simulators
* Illinois Supreme Court to consider remap ballot measure
* Rauner vetoes construction-wage, homecare-worker pay increases
* Rauner apologizes, Chicago teachers protest over 2011 email questioning their competency

* Nearly 3 dozen gang members indicted in Chicago area
* Is this the end for health care mega-deals?
* What to know about Medicare's big bundled-payment expansion
* How to save Americans money on cardiac care
* McDonald's misses estimates on same-store sales


* Day 2 Dem convention: Meryl Streep, Lena Dunham, America Fererra
* Emanuel accepts Rauner apology for insult to teachers, principals
* Feds target Latin Kings in freshly unsealed indictments
* 51-year-old woman shot in Chicago Lawn
* Determined to be hip, ‘Nerve’ catches all the high school cliches
* Reviving Illini: Lovie Smith giving it old college try
* All-day breakfast isn’t enough for McDonald’s
* 3 shot in Austin
* Volkswagen’s $15B emissions settlement gets early OK from judge
* AB InBev ups offer for SABMiller after Brexit pound slump


* What big city had biggest home-price bump in May? Chicago
* Union leader calls Rauner a 'jackass,' vows to 'take him out' in 2018
* Feds charge dozens of alleged Latin Kings in sweeping conspiracy
* Mom pleads guilty for her role in stabbing death of daughter's cat
* Indiana GOP panel backs Gov. Pence's preferred successor
* Bernie Sanders could have larger role at Democratic National Convention tonight
* Study: Homicide rate surging for black Chicagoans
* Islamic State group claims France church attack that killed priest
* At least 105 Russians barred from Rio Olympics over doping
* 18-year-old killed, two other teens, 13 and 17, wounded in South Austin


* Kathleen Parker: The fury of Herr Trumpf
* High-profile Republican state lawmaker abruptly resigns
* High-profile GOP Illinois lawmaker Sandack suddenly resigns
* 2 efforts in Illinois attempt to change sex offender laws
* Rauner renews call for term limits
* Rauner-created business development group gets new name
* Pam Molitoris: Hunger doesn't take a summer vacation
* State costs for amendment notices likely to top $2 million
* Statehouse Insider: Rauner, AFSCME conduct PR war while labor talks at standstill
* Bernard Schoenburg: Buscher moves from independent to GOP, Trump


* PODCAST: Champaign County Sheriff's Office officials describe shooting incident
* Memphis to Peoria runners take on heat, rain, childhood cancer
* Man charged with residential burglary in Champaign apartment break-in
* Early-morning Urbana robbery similar to one in Champaign last week
* News conference on shooting July 26, 2016
* RIDING IN STYLE
* Five people hospitalized following three-car collision on Monday in Williamson County
* Franklin Hospital board to consider extension of Morthland's contract
* Prosecutors: Blagojevich isn't 'deserving of leniency'
* Champaign County Sheriff shots investigation


* Big Ten's Delany does not see Rose Bowl move to accommodate playoffs
* Theater events: Duo 'Raising the Standard' at Steel Beam
* Man charged in Buffalo Grove woman's slaying found competent to stand trial
* Woman pleads guilty to helping stab family cat to death
* Wood Dale's Prairie Fest expected to draw 20,000

* House lawmakers overcome hurdle on key tra...
* Rodney Davis talks funding with Bloomingto...
* The agency that fought Illiana gets a new ...
* Rep. Dold takes educational cruise down Ch...
* Lawmakers decry high turnover rate of VA h...
* CBD Oil, and politics
* Simon considering state Senate bid
* Killer Congressman Tom MacArthur trying to...
* Shutdown? State may not notice
* Rep. Bob Dold

* Democrats Call For Sen. Durbin To Run For ......
* Durbin won't rule out challenging Rauner f......
* Democrats Urging Senator Dick Durbin to Ru......

* Talk of the County - Chicago Tribune...
* Home Foreclosures Kirk, Durbin and IHDA An......

* Proposed Wilson/Broadway Development Passes 46th Ward Z&D Committee
* Six Years after Dodd-Frank: Higher Costs, Uncertain Benefits
* Judicial Watch: Obama Attendance at Paris Climate Change Conference Cost Taxpayers $2,976,296.20
* Rauner Signs Bill To Regulate Police Use Of Cellphone Trackers
* 99 Chicago Public Schools Test Positive For Lead In Water
* New Research Explores The 'State Of America's Fathers'
* 'Citywide Peace Walk' To Be Held Saturday In Chicago
* Lemonade Stand Economics
* Texas prosecutors drop felony charges on Center for Medical Progress investigative journalists
* Illinois GOP Lawmaker Steps Down After Facing 'Cyber Security Issues'


* Zika Virus And The 2016 Summer Olympics - Travel guidance for those heading to Brazil for the Olympics
* Serve Illinois Commission Announces $15.6 Million for AmeriCorps Programs - 32 grantees will place almost 1,600 AmeriCorps volunteers in communities
* Rauner Calls on General Assembly to Vote on Constitutional Amendment for Term Limits in Fall Veto Session
* IDNR Announces 2016–17 Waterfowl Season Dates
* Discount Admission Tickets Available For Purchase At Area Retailers - Fair to extend purchasing hours at Emmerson Building




Hosted by MCS -- CapitolFax.com Privacy Policy -- SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax -- Advertise Here -- Mobile Version -- Contact Rich Miller