SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      Mobile Version     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact
CapitolFax.com
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
Spread it out, lower the rates

Friday, Jul 18, 2014

* Bruce Rauner’s “plan” to lower income taxes and kinda sorta replace a few dollars of them with a new sales tax on services is part of a pattern among Republican governors. Here’s a New York Times story from January of 2013

Republican governors are moving aggressively to cut personal and corporate income taxes, including proposals that would increase reliance on state sales taxes, setting up ambitious experiments in tax reform that could shape what is possible on a national level. […]

In Louisiana, Gov. Bobby Jindal is pushing to repeal the state’s personal and corporate income taxes and make up the lost revenue through higher sales taxes. Gov. Dave Heineman of Nebraska iscalling for much the same thing in his state. Gov. Sam Brownback of Kansas wants to keep in place what was supposed to be a temporary increase in the state sales tax to help pay for his plan to lower and eventually end his state’s income tax.

Along the way these governors are taking small first steps into a debate over what kind of tax system most encourages growth in a 21st-century economy. In particular they are focusing attention on the idea, long championed by conservatives but accepted up to a point by economists of all stripes, that the economy would be better served by focusing taxation on consumption rather than on income.

Taxing consumption has the potential to lift economic growth by encouraging more savings and investment. But the shift could also increase inequality by reducing taxes predominantly for the wealthy, who spend a smaller share of their income than middle- and lower-income people.

“The question of whether we should tax income or whether we should tax spending is really a proxy for a different debate,” said Joseph Henchman, vice president for state projects at the Tax Foundation, a conservative-leaning research organization. “Everyone agrees we’ll get more growth with consumption taxes. It’s just that some people prioritize fairness.”

If you “encourage more savings and investment” through taxation, then how does that inject any demand into the economy? Demand drives growth. By their own logic, they’d drive consumption down, which would decrease demand, which would decrease growth.

* More

For Mr. Jindal and other Republican governors who are considering a presidential run in 2016, there are obvious political benefits to having a robust income tax-cutting record to present to conservative primary voters.

But Democrats say the approach would lead to cutbacks in education, health care and other vital services while shifting relatively more of the tax burden to those who can least afford it.

“These aren’t pro-growth policies — they’re shell games that reward the wealthiest Americans at the expense of everyone else,” said Danny Kanner, a spokesman for the Democratic Governors Association.

Cutting a billionaire’s income taxes while raising sales/service taxes on the broader economy would indeed help that billionaire.

* Even so, I generally favor broader taxation at lower rates. Rauner’s service tax idea is just a first step. It could be broadened much further to take advantage of that sector’s historic annual growth. But that ought to be accompanied by a lower sales tax rate. It doesn’t have to be revenue neutral, but people should be given a break overall.

* And the same goes for income taxes. According to the Civic Federation

The individual income tax base is expected to grow at a rate of only 1.9% compared to the retirement income growth rate of 6.5%. […]

The Illinois Comptroller estimates that this exemption of federally taxable retirement income reduced the State’s individual income tax revenues by $2.0 billion in FY2012.

So, what does Illinois do? It taxes slow-growth individual income at 5 percent and doesn’t tax high-growth retirement income at all. That doesn’t make sense.

Spread it out, lower the rate.

Easier said than done, of course. Retirees by definition have a lot of extra time on their hands for things like screaming at their legislators.

* But, if anyone has any real guts, they might wanna challenge the constitutionality of this retirement income exemption. From the Constitution

A tax on or measured by income shall be at a non-graduated rate. At any one time there may be no more than one such tax imposed by the State for State purposes on individuals and one such tax so imposed on corporations.

We’re only supposed to have one personal, non-graduated income tax rate for individuals in Illinois, but we actually have two, and one of them is decidedly graduated (at the rate of zero).

/rant

- Posted by Rich Miller        


42 Comments
  1. - SAP - Friday, Jul 18, 14 @ 12:25 pm:

    At the risk of sounding like a class warrior, Illinois seniors get a couple big tax breaks, just for being old. To wit: Retirement income is not taxed at all in Illinois and senior homestead exemptions give seniors huge property tax breaks. Neither of these breaks are based on need or ability to pay, they are just examples of pandering to people who vote. As a result, the rest of us pay higher taxes.


  2. - The Doc - Friday, Jul 18, 14 @ 12:31 pm:

    Amen, Rich.

    Brownback’s experiment in Kansas has been an epic failure, so much so that a stable full of state GOPers have endorsed his Dem opponent - who also happens to be leading in the polls.

    In Kansas.

    That’s why it’s encouraging to see Rauner at least float the concept of slaying a few sacred cows, even if it’s accompanied by some cowardly and unsound recommendations meant to soften the political blow.


  3. - Esteban - Friday, Jul 18, 14 @ 12:35 pm:

    Is Rauner really a billionaire or is this merely
    hyperbole from Camp Quinn? I’ve been under the
    impression that he is NOT.


  4. - Bill White - Friday, Jul 18, 14 @ 12:35 pm:

    === If you “encourage more savings and investment” through taxation, then how does that inject any demand into the economy? Demand drives growth. By their own logic, they’d drive consumption down, which would decrease demand, which would decrease growth. ===

    This is the crux of the debate. The current generation of GOP politicians deny that demand is relevant and say Keynes has been proven wrong.


  5. - john - Friday, Jul 18, 14 @ 12:41 pm:

    Rich - Spreading it out and lowering the rate may work with sales tax and capital gains, but when it comes to income it doesn’t work and here is why: http://acivilamericandebate.com/2011/04/10/the-30-year-growth-of-income-inequality/

    The Civic Committee points out that retirement income grows faster than wage income. That is only when you count all wage earners. If you eliminate the bottom 99% of wage earners, you see income growth rates in the 6-8% range and even higher for those with the highest incomes.

    If we use the Civic Committee’s same theory - tax the highest growing sectors of income in the state. The real income growth in the country and the state is all in the top 0.5% of income earners. If we tax everyone at the same rate for their income we are actually hurting poorer families because their incomes have been shirking over time. To capture the revenue that the state needs, higher income individuals should pay higher tax rates and lower income people should pay lower income tax rates.


  6. - Concerned - Friday, Jul 18, 14 @ 12:43 pm:

    Bill White is right. The Republican notion that more lower taxes = more investment = growth ignores that (1) there is a record amount of cash on corprate balance sheets–sitting idle becuase no capital investments are worth making with demand so low; (2) more savings and investments will produce more idle cash. Go back to step one. We need to focus on creating more demand.


  7. - Rich Miller - Friday, Jul 18, 14 @ 12:45 pm:

    === To capture the revenue that the state needs, higher income individuals should pay higher tax rates===

    OK, but you gotta amend the Constitution to do that. Good luck with that impossible climb.


  8. - Chris - Friday, Jul 18, 14 @ 12:49 pm:

    “The Civic Committee points out that retirement income grows faster than wage income. That is only when you count all wage earners. If you eliminate the bottom 99% of wage earners, you see income growth rates in the 6-8% range and even higher for those with the highest incomes.”

    What if you eliminate the bottom 99% of retirees? What is the growth rate of retirement income for the 1% of retirees?

    I bet its a LOT higher than 6-8%.

    Give retirees a $30k exemption, tax everything above that as OI. Done.


  9. - john - Friday, Jul 18, 14 @ 12:51 pm:

    Rich - I wasn’t saying it was probable. I was extrapolating a theory based on the Civic Committee’s theory.


  10. - Fed up - Friday, Jul 18, 14 @ 12:57 pm:

    I’m all for broadening the sales tax, I doubt that lowering the income tax to 3% is a good idea with states debt and pension issues. Quinn refuses to increase revenue through gambling or oil production so taxes are all that’s left. Well, maybe a back sale


  11. - Norseman - Friday, Jul 18, 14 @ 1:03 pm:

    === The individual income tax base is expected to grow at a rate of only 1.9% compared to the retirement income growth rate of 6.5%. […] ===

    It would have been nice if they had sourced these numbers. I’d have to see it from a creditable source before accepting this statement as fact.

    In reviewing the CF article, I found it interesting that they suggest exempting the first $50,000 of retirement income from taxation. To me this suggests a graduated income tax which I thought was verboten to the business types.

    The discussion regarding the fairness of exempting retirement income from the income tax is appropriate. [Although selfishly I’d like to keep the current system.] Shifting the majority of the tax burden from income to sales taxes is not appropriate. Sales taxes in general are regressive.

    With respect to Rich’s suggestion of a lawsuit regarding the retirement income exemption, it would be an interesting case. I suspect the retiree response is that the State has the right to exempt a class of persons by the type of income, but it can’t exempt persons by how much of a taxable income they make.


  12. - Chris - Friday, Jul 18, 14 @ 1:03 pm:

    Fed up: “Well, maybe a [bake] sale”

    PQ can get the Cupcake Girl to do it! At $3/cupcake, that’s only about 10,000 cupcakes for every single person in the state, and we’d be in good shape!

    Uhoh–that probably violates the Cupcake Girl regulation exemptions. Back to the drawing board!


  13. - MrJM (@MisterJayEm) - Friday, Jul 18, 14 @ 1:07 pm:

    Is Rauner really a billionaire or is this merely hyperbole from Camp Quinn? I’ve been under the impression that he is NOT.

    The watch and Carhartt are working!

    – MrJM


  14. - Chris - Friday, Jul 18, 14 @ 1:08 pm:

    Norseman: “It would have been nice if they had sourced these numbers. I’d have to see it from a creditable source before accepting this statement as fact.”

    I’ll bet you a dollar that a big piece of that difference in growth is bc of the approaching first wave of baby boomer retirements–if the working age population is flat, but retiree population growing by ~4%, then that’s basically the difference between the growth in “base”, right?


  15. - Chris - Friday, Jul 18, 14 @ 1:09 pm:

    “The watch and Carhartt are working!”

    If you count the $19 for the watch, I think it puts him over the Billion mark. But he’s depreciated it now.


  16. - Grandson of Man - Friday, Jul 18, 14 @ 1:19 pm:

    I absolutely support a tax on my retirement income in Illinois. I support pension reform and didn’t even mind the possibly-illegal reform that is in court. It’s a progressive reform, and I support it because I think it will do the state tremendous good. These things are less of a big deal to me compared to other things like collective bargaining rights and tax fairness–but that’s just me.

    “The real income growth in the country and the state is all in the top 0.5% of income earners. If we tax everyone at the same rate for their income we are actually hurting poorer families because their incomes have been shirking over time.”

    This is why I don’t support totally getting rid of income taxes and substituting them for service taxes. That’s an ALEC-type of model, and politicians like Gov. Nikki Haley and Gov. Brownback of Kansas are ALEC-type of politicians. This model seems to be meant to divest certain wealthy entities of as much tax liability as possible.

    States that have higher income taxes than us seem to be doing okay, so these are tax models that rebut the ALEC-type models.

    I support paying the current income tax and also having a “millionaire surcharge” type of tax, so that our taxes can be more in line with other “high-growth” states, i.e. states with progressive income taxes and higher top tax rates.


  17. - bored now - Friday, Jul 18, 14 @ 1:25 pm:

    ah, balancing these state budgets on the backs of poor people. how noble! but at least they won’t complain (or vote), right???

    i guess if lincoln was alive today and gave the gettysburg speech, republican governors (and candidates) would insist that he say, “government of the rich, by the rich and for the rich”…


  18. - Andrew Szakmary - Friday, Jul 18, 14 @ 1:33 pm:

    I think Illinois should tax retirement income. The only caveat is that, almost by definition, retirees are very likely less tied to the state than working people with jobs. Tax them too much, and a not insignificant portion of them may move out of state. On those who do, you also lose the property tax, sales tax, gas tax revenue, etc. If retirement income is taxed, I think the amount of the exemption (if any) should be carefully studied, because the revenue-maximizing amount for state and local government combined may not be zero.


  19. - PublicServant - Friday, Jul 18, 14 @ 1:35 pm:

    Illinois currently has only one rate on taxable income. An exemption for retirement income is not a second rate of zero. Go ahead and sue. The Supremes will spank you very much.


  20. - PublicServant - Friday, Jul 18, 14 @ 1:37 pm:

    Grandson of Man has it right.


  21. - Rich Miller - Friday, Jul 18, 14 @ 1:37 pm:

    ===An exemption for retirement income is not a second rate of zero===

    The Supremes have knocked down other exemptions as being so high that they amount to graduated. So, I think it’s possible.


  22. - Anonymous - Friday, Jul 18, 14 @ 1:37 pm:

    Tax my retirement income and I leave the state. No reason to stay, and others will follow.


  23. - Ghost - Friday, Jul 18, 14 @ 1:38 pm:

    So let’s exempt income of less then 1 million, and tax everyone with 1 mil or over at the single rate of 8%


  24. - Rich Miller - Friday, Jul 18, 14 @ 1:39 pm:

    Ghost, read my previous post. You can’t do that here.


  25. - Anon - Friday, Jul 18, 14 @ 1:49 pm:

    “If you “encourage more savings and investment” through taxation, then how does that inject any demand into the economy? Demand drives growth. By their own logic, they’d drive consumption down, which would decrease demand, which would decrease growth.”

    This also why income inequality matters.

    “We rich people have been falsely persuaded by our schooling and the affirmation of society, and have convinced ourselves, that we are the main job creators. It’s simply not true. There can never be enough super-rich Americans to power a great economy. I earn about 1,000 times the median American annually, but I don’t buy thousands of times more stuff. My family purchased three cars over the past few years, not 3,000. I buy a few pairs of pants and a few shirts a year, just like most American men. I bought two pairs of the fancy wool pants I am wearing as I write, what my partner Mike calls my “manager pants.” I guess I could have bought 1,000 pairs. But why would I? Instead, I sock my extra money away in savings, where it doesn’t do the country much good.”

    Read more: http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2014/06/the-pitchforks-are-coming-for-us-plutocrats-108014_Page3.html#ixzz37qbZu0SU


  26. - Chris - Friday, Jul 18, 14 @ 1:50 pm:

    “Tax my retirement income and I leave the state.”

    As everyone (rightly) says to the bozos like Jimmy John whats-his-name: Don’t let the door hit you.


  27. - steve schnorf - Friday, Jul 18, 14 @ 1:52 pm:

    norseman, try COGFA for the income tax growth rate here in Illinois


  28. - Norseman - Friday, Jul 18, 14 @ 2:17 pm:

    Unless I’m misunderstanding tax law, income generated in the state is taxed regardless of where you live. As a state pensioner, I can’t run away to avoid an Illinois income tax.


  29. - forwhatitsworth - Friday, Jul 18, 14 @ 2:29 pm:

    I think Chris at 1:50 would eventually eat his words. I would predict thousands of retirees, including myself would be gone fast enough that the door wouldn’t have a chance to hit me (in the ass)if retirement income is taxed which removes a major incentive to stay. Simple economics.


  30. - PublicServant - Friday, Jul 18, 14 @ 2:44 pm:

    Before we leave, however, we’ll vote.


  31. - Dan Johnson - Friday, Jul 18, 14 @ 2:47 pm:

    Is Norseman right? That’s a really important question — does a Florida resident collecting an Illinois public pension pay Illinois income tax (if we didn’t exempt retirement income)? I thought you only pay based on the state where you live not on where the income is generated, but if Norseman is right, then the single biggest concern about not taxing retirement income disappears. Any experts willing to educate?


  32. - Michelle Flaherty - Friday, Jul 18, 14 @ 3:27 pm:

    Where will you go? Indiana? Indiana taxes retirement income. Most states with taxes do.


  33. - kimocat - Friday, Jul 18, 14 @ 3:39 pm:

    No Norseman is not right. You pay state tax where you live, not where your check comes from. I live out of state and pay my state’s income taxes on a portion of my Illinois pension.


  34. - JS Mill - Friday, Jul 18, 14 @ 3:40 pm:

    If a person receives a Illinois public pension but is the resident of another state they are not taxed in Illinois. Martire has it right, tax pension income over $75,000, 1% tax on services, reduce property tax by 25%. Martire has always had it right which is precisely while the politicians have not listened. For those who will move if retirement income is taxed I would say that I am sorry to hear that. I think once you add up the costs of moving and what the real costs of living in another state are it will not be worth it. If the numbers are there I would question what you might be moving too. I am not looking to run people off, just a reasonable level of taxation to support the public services. That leads to the debate on what those should be and the need to control our legislatures addiction to creating new programs (without consideration of funding).


  35. - Dan Johnson - Friday, Jul 18, 14 @ 3:56 pm:

    Thanks


  36. - Anonymous - Friday, Jul 18, 14 @ 4:02 pm:

    Michelle Flaherty, Do some research. There are states out there that do not tax retirement income. Florida and Nevada are 2, out of about 10.


  37. - Michelle Flaherty - Friday, Jul 18, 14 @ 4:41 pm:

    The key words being “most states”


  38. - Just the Facts - Friday, Jul 18, 14 @ 4:46 pm:

    Technically, retirement income is not exempted, it is subtracted from federal adjusted gross income in determining taxable income. It is one of many distractions granted to both individuals and corporations. As I recall, it was included in the original 1969 income tax act. From a legalleg it is no more vulnerable to legal challenge than any of the other distractions.

    I believe it should be eliminated, but I am of the opinion that legislation will be required as a court challenge would not succeed.


  39. - Just the Facts - Friday, Jul 18, 14 @ 4:48 pm:

    Spell check seems to want to change subtraction to distractions


  40. - Norseman - Friday, Jul 18, 14 @ 4:51 pm:

    I’m pretty sure I’m right. If you have income derived from Illinois, you get taxed no matter where you live. Goggle it.

    Also, remember that this is a hypothetical talking about taxing retirement income in Illinois. I know it’s not done now, but if so you can’t escape that tax by moving if your retirement income comes from Illinois.


  41. - Chris - Monday, Jul 21, 14 @ 6:29 pm:

    “I think Chris at 1:50 would eventually eat his words.”

    Why would I care? I’m not retired–I’d rather live in a state where the political will slants in favor of the working man, and against the retiree. Once I retire, my interests will flip.

    All you retirees had the ‘advantage’ of a state that didn’t pay it’s bills while you are working, and now that the bill is due, want to not have to pay anything.

    Note: I have exactly *zero* relatives older than me living in Illinois.


  42. - Chris - Monday, Jul 21, 14 @ 6:35 pm:

    Norseman:

    “I’m pretty sure I’m right. If you have income derived from Illinois, you get taxed no matter where you live.”

    I had always had the same thought, but someone here cited to a federal statute that states the contrary. But I can’t find it now…will try again, tho.


Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.


* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Fundraiser/event list
* How can we miss you if you won't go away?
* Question of the day
* Supreme Court justice ordered to testify
* Chicago downgraded
* Today's number: 4-6 weeks
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Human service cuts and state grant suspensions
* Stating the obvious
* They really make this too easy...
* Crain's: "Market-based" solution is rigged
* *** UPDATED x1 *** Even more problems for Schock
* Yesterday's blog posts

Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............


Search This Blog...

Search the 98th General Assembly By Bill Number
(example: HB0001)

Search the 98th General Assembly By Keyword

          
        * Build and defend your Spartan city in new Android game
        * Visa Announces Acquisition Of TrialPay To Expand Its Offers Platform
        * Sonic Runners is a side-scrolling version of the classic SEGA game
        * Buyer's Guide: Deals on iPad Air, iMac, MacBook Air, and Apple Accessories
        * Joe Dever’s Lone Wolf RPG gamebook gets a complete edition
        * Latest Sony MWC 2015 teaser could hint at new waterproof tech
        * Boy meets girl. Is it #Lumialove?

        * Proposed Chinese security law could mean tough rules for tech companies
        * Sundar Pichai on the direction — or directions — of Google+
        * This Week's Most Popular Posts: February 13th to 20th
        * Huawei leaks its own Android Wear watch early in Barcelona
        * Think you’re locked into a mobile OS now? Wait until it runs your car
        * Connected door knobs are lying to us
        * The Humble Binder Clip Just Became Much More Useful 

        * Webb overcame grief during rookie season
        * McEwing proud to be considered manager material
        * White Sox hope Vince Coleman has some star pupils this season
        * First week of camp in the books for improved White Sox
        * Maximizing speed Coleman's mission with White Sox
        * Davidson reclaims zeal for game, confidence
        * Terrerobytes: Jose Quintana shows up on the radar

        ...............


        Main Menu
        Home
        Illinois
        YouTube
        Pundit rankings
        Obama
        Subscriber Content
        Durbin
        Burris
        Blagojevich Trial
        Advertising
        Updated Posts
        Polls

        Archives
        February 2015
        January 2015
        December 2014
        November 2014
        October 2014
        September 2014
        August 2014
        July 2014
        June 2014
        May 2014
        April 2014
        March 2014
        February 2014
        January 2014
        December 2013
        November 2013
        October 2013
        September 2013
        August 2013
        July 2013
        June 2013
        May 2013
        April 2013
        March 2013
        February 2013
        January 2013
        December 2012
        November 2012
        October 2012
        September 2012
        August 2012
        July 2012
        June 2012
        May 2012
        April 2012
        March 2012
        February 2012
        January 2012
        December 2011
        November 2011
        October 2011
        September 2011
        August 2011
        July 2011
        June 2011
        May 2011
        April 2011
        March 2011
        February 2011
        January 2011
        December 2010
        November 2010
        October 2010
        September 2010
        August 2010
        July 2010
        June 2010
        May 2010
        April 2010
        March 2010
        February 2010
        January 2010
        December 2009
        November 2009
        October 2009
        September 2009
        August 2009
        July 2009
        June 2009
        May 2009
        April 2009
        March 2009
        February 2009
        January 2009
        December 2008
        November 2008
        October 2008
        September 2008
        August 2008
        July 2008
        June 2008
        May 2008
        April 2008
        March 2008
        February 2008
        January 2008
        December 2007
        November 2007
        October 2007
        September 2007
        August 2007
        July 2007
        June 2007
        May 2007
        April 2007
        March 2007
        February 2007
        January 2007
        December 2006
        November 2006
        October 2006
        September 2006
        August 2006
        July 2006
        June 2006
        May 2006
        April 2006
        March 2006
        February 2006
        January 2006
        December 2005
        April 2005
        March 2005
        February 2005
        January 2005
        December 2004
        November 2004
        October 2004

        Blog*Spot Archives
        November 2005
        October 2005
        September 2005
        August 2005
        July 2005
        June 2005
        May 2005

        Syndication

        RSS Feed 2.0
        Comments RSS 2.0
        WordPress

        Loading


        * Rauner Appoints Board of Trustee Members..
        * Question of the day..
        * Rauner appoints Madison County lawyer to SIU board..
        * Budget proposal draws concern from FFA chapter..
        * Ex-Gov. Quinn advocates for consumer rights in .....
        * Chicago's debt is now two notches above junk: M.....
        * Lurie Children's CEO Patrick Magoon: We need to.....
        * Ex-Gov. Quinn advocates consumer rights in Loyo.....
        * Rauner appoints 5 to Board of Trustees position.....
        * State Cuts Would Out Palatine $3.4 Million..


        * Ex-Gov. Quinn pushes consumer rights, blasts Rauner's budget
        * Gov. Rauner says he's 'staying out' of Chicago mayor's race
        * Illinois football staffer sentenced to probation for DUI
        * Medical marijuana grower gives up 1 of 3 Illinois licenses
        * Feds search suburban Chicago home in Islamic State case
        * Lawmaker reimbursed costs for lavish office decor
        * Nature photographer acquitted on charges of taking eaglets
        * Judge won't delay sentencing for ex-Illinois Rep. Farnham
        * Hesburgh, former Notre Dame president, dies at 97
        * Mayoral candidates agree to 3 debates ahead of runoff

        * Schock reimburses costs for lavish 'Downton Abbey' office decor
        * Quinn advocates consumer rights in Loyola speech
        * Judge won't delay sentencing for former state lawmaker Farnham
        * Lt. Gov. Sanguinetti says GOP should court women, Latinos
        * Explore salary information for the state of Illinois
        * State Rep. Raymond Poe to be back at work next week
        * State plan would aid Exelon nuclear plants
        * Sanguinetti says GOP should court women, Latinos
        * Federal appeals court declines to decide Chicago retiree benefits issue
        * Federal appeals court declines to decide Illinois retiree benefits issue

        * How Joy Chen plans to revive H2O Plus
        * Scopes in UCLA superbug case linked to unreported deaths in other states
        * #ThrowbackThis, FCC: Verizon's snarky response to net-neutrality ruling
        * State supreme court justice to testify in election fraud case
        * Aaron Schock repays for 'Downton' office redo


          * Rep. Schock reimburses government for 'Downton Abbey' renovation
          * Bulls expect Derrick Rose back this season after successful surgery
          * Judge rejects delay in sentencing for ailing ex-state legislator
          * Ex-McHenry County coroner charged with forgery, misconduct
          * Moody's downgrades Chicago's debt rating
          * Man, 60, shot dead while shoveling neighbor's walk
          * Chicago area among noisiest as measured by National Park Service
          * Teacher dies after collapsing at Austin grade school
          * Mayoral candidates to debate
          * Bali monitor sought for teen's trust fund


          * History Series: The Importance Of "Poles" In Campaigning
          * Child Care Providers Rally in Capitol
          * Listen to State Week - February 27, 2015
          * Parents, Day Care Providers Worry About Child Care Funding
          * Inaccurate voter data could hurt Asian voter blocs, other ethnic groups
          * Concerns raised over interrogation tactics aren't unique to Homan Square
          * Unique Flavors
          * A Daily Realization
          * Chicago sets early voting record in last weekend before mayoral election
          * Standoff over new state school test continues


          * Schock reimburses costs for lavish 'Downton Abbey' office decor
          * Quinn advocates consumer rights in Loyola speech
          * Our Opinion: Turbulent times ahead for Illinois lawmakers
          * Judge won't delay sentencing for former state lawmaker Farnham
          * Lt. Gov. Sanguinetti says GOP should court women, Latinos
          * Fred Hayes: Illinois police support body cameras, but with tweaks to state law
          * E.J. Dionne: Chicago's Rahm-Chuy Show
          * Esther Cepeda: The captain of my family's ship
          * Quote of the Day: Friday, Feb. 27, 2015
          * Explore salary information for the state of Illinois


          * Tom's Mailbag Feb. 27, 2015
          * 1 dies, 2 are injured in Bloomington house fire
          * Schock repays government costs of lavish office decor
          * O’Fallon dispatchers find ways to stay active on the job
          * Cubit sentenced to court supervision in DUI case
          * Donations will let Cahokia Mounds print brochures; national designation sought
          * Friday Feb. 27 government meetings
          * Bloomington Ward 6 candidate dies
          * Lawmaker reimbursed costs for lavish office decor
          * Leonard Nimoy, famous as Mr. Spock on 'Star Trek,' dies


          * Westmont man seeks new trial after murder conviction
          * Naperville restaurant that replaced Connie's Pizza closes
          * Eagles release lineman Herremans, save $2.8M on salary cap
          * ‘Star Trek' actor, Leonard Nimoy, dead at 83
          * Illinois football staffer sentenced to probation for DUI

          * Congressional art contest for students set...
          * Congressional Letter Shows Bipartisan Supp...
          * Lipinski nominates 22 to service academies...
          * Editorial: Is the Ice Cracking? | Transpor...
          * Rep. Lipinski Leads Letter Urging House Le...
          * Rep. Lipinski Announces $2.9 Million Feder...
          * Shortline tax credit legislation enters Ho...
          * Rep. Lipinski Announces STEM Education Gra...
          * Rep. Lipinski Helps Spur Launch of New Dep...
          * Short-line tax credit extension bill enter...

          * Democrats caught between Obama, Netanyahu ......
          * Senate approves DHS funding bill; could av......
          * Netanyahu to hold bipartisan meeting with ......
          * Senate passes homeland security bill House......
          * Senator Durbin: First-Of-Its-Kind Report O......

          * Corker Praises Committee Passage Of Bipart......
          * The New York Times Cheers On A Nuclear Iran...
          * ATHLETICS: Derry schools shine at Cross Co......
          * Clay will boycott Netanyahu address to Con......

          * Morning Minute: Selling your home this winter? Quick tips to improve its curb appeal
          * Thursday’s ‘Housing Older Adults’ Webinar available online
          * Rauner urges cabinet to bring problems forward
          * Schock repays for office redecorating
          * DC will not become ‘like Amsterdam.’ It’ll be better.
          * 5 Loaves restaurant has electrical box stolen
          * LaHood seeks solution to ‘Common Core’ problems
          * Starkehaus: CPAC 2015 Thursday Lineup
          * State's outdated driver's licenses could keep Illinoisans from flying
          * Judge won't delay sentencing for ex-Illinois Rep. Farnham


          * IEMA Urges People to Prepare for Severe Weather - Tornadoes, floods and severe storms can happen any time of year
          * IDHS helps more than 5,000 individuals with disabilities find jobs - Program offers necessary tools to earn a living wage and become more independent
          * 24th Anniversary Desert Storm Remembrance Ceremony
          * Illinois Department of Human Rights Announces 2015 Spring Training Schedule
          * Snow and Freezing Rain to Impact Travel in Illinois - IDOT Crews Prepared to Battle Winter Weather this Weekend




              Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller