SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      Mobile Version     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact
CapitolFax.com
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
Question of the day

Thursday, Jul 24, 2014

* AP

More than half the states to hold primary elections so far have seen record-low turnouts, according to a nonpartisan survey of voter rolls released Monday. That perhaps is a sign of widespread apathy within both political parties ahead of November’s midterm elections.

Of the almost 123 million voters who were eligible to cast ballots in primaries, only 18 million have done so, and states with same-day voter registration actually saw their turnout rates drop, according to the Center for the Study of the American Electorate. Despite heavy campaign spending that is poised to make history, 15 of the 25 states that have held statewide primary elections each reported a record low percentage of voters who cast ballots. […]

Nonetheless, Democrats saw a 29 percent decline from 2010’s primaries, the 11th consecutive midterm elections to see a drop in participation.

Republicans posted a 15 percent decline in participation from 2010. But their rate was closer to historical norms after tea party enthusiasm in 2010 led to a turnout spike.

The two parties’ combined participation rate this year is less than half of the most recent high of 32 percent, posted in 1966.

* The Question: Should we abandon traditional partisan primaries and move to an “open” system where the top two vote-getters, regardless of party, advance to November? Take the poll and then explain your answer in comments, please.


panel management

- Posted by Rich Miller        


58 Comments
  1. - Almost the Weekend - Thursday, Jul 24, 14 @ 2:19 pm:

    This has worked in Louisiana and California. A R and D state traditionally the past ten years respectively. More importantly will create more moderate candidates and hold politicians responsible in Democratic or Republican strongholds in Illinois.


  2. - Dude - Thursday, Jul 24, 14 @ 2:19 pm:

    no….political primary voters should have the right to nominate their party candidate. The long, sought after question, is how to effect, or is it affect, voter apathy? I strive to impact that every day


  3. - Tom - Thursday, Jul 24, 14 @ 2:20 pm:

    There isn’t any data that shows an increase in voter turnout due to a top two primary. It also has been shown, at least yet, to decrease the partisanship in elections.


  4. - Grandson of Man - Thursday, Jul 24, 14 @ 2:21 pm:

    I voted yes. Let the voters vote the way they want.


  5. - Chris - Thursday, Jul 24, 14 @ 2:22 pm:

    Yes, but combined with some sort of non-partisan redistricting plan, so that the general elections aren’t turned into (effectively) merely partisan run-offs.


  6. - Reality Check - Thursday, Jul 24, 14 @ 2:25 pm:

    Better idea: Ranked-choice or instant-runoff voting.


  7. - ??? - Thursday, Jul 24, 14 @ 2:26 pm:

    I voted yes. I know lots of people who work in government who won’t vote in partisan primaries, simply because they’re afraid to be identified as a member of the party that is not in power.


  8. - Stones - Thursday, Jul 24, 14 @ 2:32 pm:

    Voted yes. I’ve had a number of people tell me they don’t vote in primaries because they don’t want to declare a party affiliation.


  9. - Carl Nyberg - Thursday, Jul 24, 14 @ 2:32 pm:

    Meh. If you want the process to be more inclusive, go to districts that send 5-6 representatives so that more diverse ideology will be included in legislative bodies.


  10. - VanillaMan - Thursday, Jul 24, 14 @ 2:37 pm:

    It is 2014, not 1966.
    We don’t think we fit either D or R anymore.
    So we don’t participate in primaries.


  11. - Precinct Captain - Thursday, Jul 24, 14 @ 2:38 pm:

    ==- Almost the Weekend - Thursday, Jul 24, 14 @ 2:19 pm:==

    The jungle primary has not created more moderate candidates in Louisiana. California just adopted it, so there’s not a body of evidence from there yet.

    A modified primary system that I support is having all candidates from all parties listed, but you can only vote for one candidate in one party. For example, if such a system were in place in our last primary, I could have pulled the trigger for Quinn for governor and Grogan for treasurer, but not for the GOP for governor of the Democratic Party for treasurer.


  12. - Ahoy! - Thursday, Jul 24, 14 @ 2:41 pm:

    Yes, an open primary would increase voter turnout, produce better candidates and better politicians. This would be good for our democracy.

    Also, if we don’t do this, why should taxpayers continue to fund the party’s filtering system for candidates. Either move to open primaries (a public good) or have the party’s pay for their own primaries.


  13. - Mason born - Thursday, Jul 24, 14 @ 2:42 pm:

    Precinct that sounds like a better idea.


  14. - CLJ - Thursday, Jul 24, 14 @ 2:42 pm:

    Go back to the true convention method of choosing candidates. Let the parties put thier best candidates forward.


  15. - Southwest Cook - Thursday, Jul 24, 14 @ 2:43 pm:

    Not a fan of California’s system because advancing two candidates to the general seems quite arbitrary. A candidate who gets over 50% in the first round should win, like in Chicago city elections.

    I would prefer instant run-off voting, which should increase moderate winners and condense the primary and general into one election, saving taxpayer money.


  16. - Formerly Known As... - Thursday, Jul 24, 14 @ 2:44 pm:

    Not unless we also do something to make the races more competitive for incumbents.

    We should make it easier for candidates and parties to get on the ballot and stay on the ballot.

    Or go to public funding.

    Or try a system where we take the top vote getter from the two “major” parties and pit them against the top vote getter from a pool of the minor parties. Do this for 5 or 10 years. If those other parties can’t build themselves into competitive organizations by then, we move on and try something different.


  17. - West Side the Best Side - Thursday, Jul 24, 14 @ 2:47 pm:

    Voted #3. An open primary in Illinois will lead to the creation of the Rich Party - people who will buy their way into office with lots of high-priced misleading ads directed at “low-information” voters. There should, however, be a nonpartisan part of the ballot for judicial candidates so their names would be able to appear on Democratic, Republican and Non-partisan ballots. There should be at least the pretence of non-political judges. (I do of course realize than the signature requirements passed in Springfield will be almost impossibly high so the voters don’t get no judicial candidates nobody sent.)


  18. - OldSmoky2 - Thursday, Jul 24, 14 @ 2:48 pm:

    I voted yes. Sen. Charles Schumer (D-NY) had an interesting op-ed in the New York Times a couple days ago supporting the concept and I thought his arguments were pretty good. Plus I agree with Ahoy! that there’s no compelling reason for taxpayers to pick up the tab for the two major parties’ nominating processes. If those parties still want primaries, let them pay for them.


  19. - Illiana - Thursday, Jul 24, 14 @ 2:50 pm:

    Let people vote how they want & don’t allow the state or anyone else to see whether primary voters voted for a Republican or a Democrat.


  20. - Bill White - Thursday, Jul 24, 14 @ 2:55 pm:

    Our primaries also are far too early in the year.

    Ten months after a state rep wins a contested general election in November, the window opens to begin collecting petition signatures for the next primary.


  21. - A guy... - Thursday, Jul 24, 14 @ 2:55 pm:

    Tough one really. Even tougher when the first case being made is that Louisiana is leading the way- whoa! lol.

    One thing other states do is have their primaries and generals much closer together. I’d definitely be for that. It would seem to mitigate some problems we see and take some money out of the system. A September primary and a November general election might be a good thing and help eliminate some voter fatigue and apathy. Right now it’s just too darn long. Plus, too many very long serving lame ducks. When you lose, it’s time to leave. Not a year later.


  22. - Chicago Cynic - Thursday, Jul 24, 14 @ 3:01 pm:

    It helped in California. I’d be good with trying it here too. As a partisan I feel comfortable saying we need to get less partisan. But until the system is reformed, no partisan will unilaterally disarm or step back.


  23. - FormerParatrooper - Thursday, Jul 24, 14 @ 3:03 pm:

    Open primaries would benefit voters like myself who do not identify as part of the party system. I vote for the person and not the party. If I am not in the minority maybe more would participate in primary elections.


  24. - Ken_in_Aurora - Thursday, Jul 24, 14 @ 3:05 pm:

    I’d much rather see instant runoff.


  25. - Amalia - Thursday, Jul 24, 14 @ 3:11 pm:

    no. I want people to declare a party preference.


  26. - Wensicia - Thursday, Jul 24, 14 @ 3:19 pm:

    I voted in two primaries, 2008 for Obama and this year I voted for Dillard. If we used an open primary system, I would vote more often. I’m not sure this would reduce voter apathy, though, but believe it would bring out more moderates and independents like me.


  27. - phocion - Thursday, Jul 24, 14 @ 3:20 pm:

    No. Opportunities for primary election mischief-making would increase ten-fold. Twenty-fold with Precinct Captain’s idea.


  28. - ??? - Thursday, Jul 24, 14 @ 3:21 pm:

    Amalia - just curious, why would you want people to declare a party preference? I think discomfort with declaring a preference (or not really identifying with one party over another) is why turnout is so low.


  29. - x ace - Thursday, Jul 24, 14 @ 3:23 pm:

    No - Nomination by declared voters is integral element of Party system


  30. - Anonymous - Thursday, Jul 24, 14 @ 3:29 pm:

    Vanilla Man right on …. I would add beyond ‘ we don’t fit’, is the prevailing thought of those like myself, is “what’s the real difference”? They may go in clean but they come out dirty. They cannot overcome the temptation$, or they got into it in the first place because it can be a real sweet deal


  31. - Tom B. - Thursday, Jul 24, 14 @ 3:30 pm:

    The top two system is not going to make things any better.

    If you want to open up primaries to anyone, I see no reason to opposed, but what people fail to realize here — this means you media — is that the problem is not the people who DO PARTICIPATE, it’s the ones who DON’T.

    But, that would require you to get tough on people who potentially might want to buy a newspaper, which is why it’s not done.

    The middle can settle these fights really easily. But they don’t, which is why the two parties don’t find it necessary to appeal to them anymore. The bases have leverage in primaries, they raise money, and they provide the volunteers and heft of the campaigns necessary to win. Is it shocking that political figures would cater to them?


  32. - Under Further Review - Thursday, Jul 24, 14 @ 3:31 pm:

    It is not a perfect solution, but I am so tired of nominees who advance on a plurality rather than a majority.


  33. - Demoralized - Thursday, Jul 24, 14 @ 3:33 pm:

    I voted no, keep it as it is.

    The problem is that voters have become incredibly lazy and don’t participate in the process. They whine and moan about how things are going yet they can’t bother to actually go vote. Then those same people want term limits put in place because they are too lazy to vote. Participate and stop whining. Otherwise you should shut up. If you can’t bother to participate then don’t whine and moan about things.


  34. - Jerome Horwitz - Thursday, Jul 24, 14 @ 3:42 pm:

    Yes. I am an independent and refuse to vote in a primary election.


  35. - retirededucator - Thursday, Jul 24, 14 @ 3:44 pm:

    closed primaries are party elections. they should continue to be so. perhaps decrease the number of petition signatures to allow creation of new parties.otherwise, how about the Iowa method of caucuses


  36. - Oswego Willy - Thursday, Jul 24, 14 @ 3:45 pm:

    Yikes!

    I voted “No - I have a better idea”.

    Ok…

    Primaries:

    Statewides. You must, MUST declare as a statewide candidate your intention for a party nomination.

    There are ballots for Statewides, absolutely no different than now.

    Wrinkle?

    GA, the top 2, no matter “party”, won the open aspect of the Primary and square off in the General.

    All…all candidates for the GA are listed on the party ballots, so you can vote for a Democratic nominee for Governor, be declared a Democrat by ballot choice, but you can vote for a GOP candidate for State Senate, for example.

    This also takes the “win the Primary, win the seat” situation out of the mix, maybe allowing more party turnover(?)

    So, Primaries, must declare to vote Statewide, but all GA on down, top 2 face off in General.

    March Primary - November General.

    It’s not perfect, but a wrinkle.


  37. - Skeptic - Thursday, Jul 24, 14 @ 3:49 pm:

    YES! Since independent and third-party candidates are effectively closed out of the system, give us independents and third-partiers a voice at the table.


  38. - AC - Thursday, Jul 24, 14 @ 3:57 pm:

    Yes, there are often larger differences within than between the parties on issues I care about. Illinois has a long history of moderate Republicans which means for most people it comes down to the individual, not the party. If I cared about “hot button” issues more the closed primary might make more sense to me.


  39. - Bill White - Thursday, Jul 24, 14 @ 4:04 pm:

    Which system? An open primary before the November general election? Or a run-off if no one gets 50% at the November general election?

    Multi-member districts (Put Back the Cut Back) is probably the most effective way to empower 3rd parties and the like.


  40. - RNUG - Thursday, Jul 24, 14 @ 4:08 pm:

    Voted yes. It’s obvious the current system isn’t working so we might as well try something different.


  41. - anon. - Thursday, Jul 24, 14 @ 4:21 pm:

    I voted No. Primaries are for adherents of a party to select that party’s candidate. The non-partisan municipal primary in Chicago merely selects which Democrats are the top two for a run-off. That said, the primaries ar much too early - move them to June.


  42. - Cheryl44 - Thursday, Jul 24, 14 @ 4:23 pm:

    Do we really want people who can’t be bothered to pay attention voting?


  43. - walker - Thursday, Jul 24, 14 @ 4:34 pm:

    No, with better idea: Move election days to Saturday, and get voting on-line for previous days.

    No, because we would have too many areas with both final candidates from one party, and the voters would not get a clear choice on approaches in the general election by hearing from both parties. Before that, they aren’t paying much attention at all. It might also fracture the parties even more than they are, with internal fights over the big prize. Our party system has served us well for many years, if contrasted to countries who have had multiple ones with constantly shifting alliances.


  44. - Excessively Rabid - Thursday, Jul 24, 14 @ 4:38 pm:

    I said yes. Don’t remember parties being mentioned in either US or Illinois constitution, and as far as I’m concerned, what’s good for them is not an issue. The current system is not working and something needs to change.


  45. - Formerly Known As... - Thursday, Jul 24, 14 @ 5:15 pm:

    Coincidentally, take a gander at the news feed on the side of the browser.

    – Super PAC backing Emanuel raises $350,000 more in just one day —

    And we wonder why someone stuck for decades in a violent Chicago neighborhood, living in poverty with their kids attending terrible schools, may not feel much love for Rahm or “the other guy”?

    They are the dummies who deserve to be looked down upon?

    It is not them who deserve scorn. It is us.

    We, in both parties, who raise $350,000 in a day while multiple generations of the kids we “represent” go to grade schools that don’t even have libraries.


  46. - Anonymous - Thursday, Jul 24, 14 @ 5:33 pm:

    no,how can i get that county job by not show the right party vote


  47. - Wensicia - Thursday, Jul 24, 14 @ 5:35 pm:

    ==Do we really want people who can’t be bothered to pay attention voting?==

    Who says they’re not paying attention? Maybe they just can’t agree with a strong liberal or conservative candidate. Maybe an open election will prompt candidates to moderate their views to attract more voters. Maybe I’m dreaming such a thing could ever happen.


  48. - DuPage Dave - Thursday, Jul 24, 14 @ 5:40 pm:

    The major change we need in Illinois is more candidates for voters to choose from, not a different primary system. Nearly all state reps run unopposed, or with token opposition. Ballot access is too difficult, the number of signatures required is ridiculous compared to other states.

    Give people something or someone to vote for, and they will vote.

    I believe the majority of Americans hate opted out from voting because the system is corrupt and biased in favor of one party in each local area. True “purple” (neither red nor blue) states or areas are quite rare.

    People are sick of the partisan b.s. that goes on in Washington and helps no one but the elected officials and their lobbyist pals.

    We need something better, but fast-tracking the election of one of the current crop is not the solution.


  49. - walker - Thursday, Jul 24, 14 @ 6:05 pm:

    Rich: when I linked via your re-lettered “take the poll”, my anti-virus programs started blowing bugles, manning the ramparts, and tossing grenades. It took me about thirty minutes to make sure everything questionable was ejected from the premises.


  50. - RNUG - Thursday, Jul 24, 14 @ 7:37 pm:

    On second thought, maybe I should have selected option #3.

    What I would like to see in either an open or closed primary, is an actual choice of “None of the Above”. And if “None of the Above” gets the most votes, then ALL the candidates get ruled invalid and a second 30 - 45 day campaign period permitted for new primary candidates. The results of the second primary would be who gets to run in the general. And in an ideal world, if it is a closed primary, then the cost of the second primary election is borne by the political party(s) who failed to have a candidate selected.


  51. - steve schnorf - Thursday, Jul 24, 14 @ 9:10 pm:

    No. Why should people who don’t self identify as Ds get to decide who the Ds nominate for something. For all practical purposes that’s the same as abolishing parties, UNLESS the nominees ran with no party labels and the parties could support whoever they wished AFTER the primary. Still seems stupid to me though. Abolishing primaries and having nominating conventions (state and county) fill their party’s slots would be fine with me also. In fact, the more I think about the better I like it.


  52. - Almost the Weekend - Thursday, Jul 24, 14 @ 9:21 pm:

    Precinct Captain..

    In theory I believe my argument would work especially with the gerrymandering has drawn the districts in Illinois. Louisiana and California’s districts in the federal or state level or not as lopsided as Illinois’ after 2010.

    For example, if you live in a Democratic or Republican Stronghold (+20), you have no opposition in the general. That gives you 8 months of no campaigning or working that respective congressional district. If another candidate was from the same party, that candidate would still be forced to work hard for the next 8 months. Campaigns keep candidates on their toes and forces them to work hard for their district 24/7. We know current office holders do not do this.

    In regards to finding more moderate candidates, Democrats or Republicans will have the chance to woo other sides. Something very similar to what Thad Cochran did in Mississippi with African Americans. A Republican voter who lives in Evanston or Chicago, now has a chance to vote for a moderate Democratic candidate, instead of voting for a Republican in the general who does not stand a chance to win.

    This is theory and reality does not always work the same way, but I think in some instances it would.


  53. - Soccertease - Thursday, Jul 24, 14 @ 9:59 pm:

    I said yes. We need to change some things to get our younger voters engaged. None of my 3 children vote (possibly my fault for being cynical working in state govt for 36 years).


  54. - DisengenUIS - Thursday, Jul 24, 14 @ 10:09 pm:

    No - #3. Proceed to a more Euro-centric election approach by sharply curtailing campaign funds/spending as well as instituting a two-round runoff system of voting where there is no limit to who or what party can be on the first-round ballot.

    A much better method of elections, as far as reducing spoilers and widening the field for more candidates.


  55. - Under Further Review - Thursday, Jul 24, 14 @ 11:48 pm:

    I wish that Illinois could hold its primary later in the year, but two outside influences are preventing that from happening: 1) presidential nominating politics and 2) the lengthy ballot litigation process in the event of challenges.

    Historically, there were years when Illinois held its nominating primaries in April, June, and, wait for it, September. Chicago always held its mayoral primary in February to discourage voter participation.


  56. - Johnny Justice - Friday, Jul 25, 14 @ 12:16 am:

    Springfield Ald. Sam Cahnman put advisory referendums on this on ballots in cities and townships all across the State. Every time the vote has been overwhelmingly YES…from 75% to 88.32. Last one was Decatur, 75% in 2012.
    Question was: Shall IL adopt an open primary law, allowing voters to cast a secret ballot in primary elections by eliminating the current requirement that voters publicly declare their political party.
    Problem is most legislators failed to heed voters’ advise. In April 2009 the Senate voted 17-37 to reject SB 1666, Sen. Bomke’s open primary bill.


  57. - Angry Chicagoan - Friday, Jul 25, 14 @ 7:48 am:

    No — look at California and Louisiana. The top two ends up being not what the voters want, but which party is the less split in the primary election.

    If Art Moore beats Tom McClintock in the California 4th this fall I may moderate my stance somewhat, but that’s still only one data point — and there are many more with either intraparty races that are opposite to the predominant partisan tilt of the local electorate (this seems to happen a fair bit in California) or situations in which effectively blurring the distinction between general election and primary means that if the majority party is split, the minority party wins (the dynamic in Louisiana).

    Top two only clearly makes sense in non-partisan elections, e.g. for city council.


  58. - Yellow Dog Democrat - Friday, Jul 25, 14 @ 8:24 am:

    Take it from me and my 20 years of experience:

    Until there is public financing and real caps, all other election reform is just window dressing.

    Will open primaries fix things.

    Sure. Like they fixed Chicago.


Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.


* Reader comments closed for the weekend
* Rauner vetoes several union-backed bills
* This just in... Illinois Supreme Court accepts direct appeal of remap case
* Social service providers claim administration has "unchecked discretion" over paying off old contracts
* GOP poll: Kirk and Duckworth essentially tied, Clinton leads by 14
* Today's quotable
* The Roger Ailes connection to Illinois
* Even more editorial support for the Independent Map Amendment
* Question of the day
* Today in Illinois history
* *** LIVE COVERAGE *** Rauner education press conference
* Trump's best point of the night
* Mrs. Rauner appears to support Turnaround Agenda strategy
* Caption contest!
* Adding some context to Rauner's e-mail diatribe
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Supplement to today’s edition
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today's edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)
* Oh, this ought to be good
* Rauner apologizes for making "unfair, untrue" comments in old e-mail
* Yesterday's blog posts

Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............
<


Search This Blog...

Search the 98th General Assembly By Bill Number
(example: HB0001)

Search the 98th General Assembly By Keyword

  
* iPhone 7 Pro specs and features, Galaxy Note 7 battery & more – Pocketnow Daily
* Evan Blass leaks Apple iPhone 7 release date
* SurveyMonkey proclaims peak Pokemon GO in US
* Instant hidden rebate for Moto G4 on Amazon
* Dots & Co. tweaks the Dots games by adding a friendly companion
* iPhone 7 Plus? iPhone 7 Pro? Here’s a video showing either or both of them
* T-Mobile upgrade fee for assisted service to affect few

* Could Morneau help end Sox offensive woes?
* Morneau's blast not enough as Sox fall
* Rangers making effort to acquire lefty Sale
* Lawrie's sore hamstring won't lead to DL stint
* Tigers 7, White Sox 5: Carson Fulmer falters in first test
* Morneau's blast not enough as Sox fall
* Sale out for win No. 15 vs. Tigers

...............


Main Menu
Home
Illinois
YouTube
Pundit rankings
Obama
Subscriber Content
Durbin
Burris
Blagojevich Trial
Advertising
Updated Posts
Polls

Archives
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005

Syndication

RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0
WordPress

Loading


* WATCHDOGS: State won't explain 'Chicago Fire' t.....
* It looks like a newspaper, but it isn’t..
* Illinois Democrats head to convention with Clin.....
* Our view: Illinois Constitution should serve th.....
* Illinois governor apologizes for calling teache.....
* Rauner Vetoes Construction-Wage, Homecare-Worke.....


* Tree planted 20 years ago to be rededicated to slain student
* EXCHANGE: Developmentally disabled musicians are dedicated
* EXCHANGE: Crystal Lake ballerina dances way into Juilliard
* Coroner's office: Illinois plane crash killed Florida man
* Illinois officials seeking dead birds for West Nile tracking
* East Peoria getting grant to demolish landslide homes
* Coroner's office: Illinois plane crash killed Florida man
* Rauner OKs regulating police use of cell-site simulators
* Illinois Supreme Court to consider remap ballot measure
* Rauner vetoes construction-wage, homecare-worker pay hikes

* Rauner OKs regulating police use of cell-site simulators
* Illinois Supreme Court to consider remap ballot measure
* Rauner vetoes construction-wage, homecare-worker pay increases
* Rauner apologizes, Chicago teachers protest over 2011 email questioning their competency
* Providers: Stop gap budget won't have 'meaningful' impact
* Rauner apologizes for calling Chicago teachers illiterate
* Illinois ordered to rethink medical marijuana for migraines
* Rauner once called Chicago teachers 'virtually illiterate'
* Gov. Rauner signs early childhood law
* Rauner once called Chicago public school teachers 'virtually illiterate'

* Jury finds rooftop owner guilty on charges he cheated Cubs
* Coming Soon: Joffrey Ballet on Navy Pier
* Airlines rake in cash as fares stay cheap. What's wrong with this picture?
* Ulta on State Street permanently closes its doors


* Pregnant woman among 3 shot in Calumet City
* BROWN: On the Chicago River, ‘somebody is going to get killed’
* WATCHDOGS: State won’t explain ‘Chicago Fire’ tax credits
* Sunday Sitdown: Dr. Stephen Devries on heart health via nutrition
* TV pioneer Jerry R. Gregoris, dead at 91, starred in cult classic
* MITCHELL: Hillary Clinton can’t bank on black votes against Trump
* Chicago satirist Scott Dikkers talks life under Trump in new book
* Involved dads lead to healthier kids, researchers find
* Struggling municipal golf courses turn to video poker, slots
* MAP: Chicago weekend shooting tracker for July 22-25


* As Democrats' convention nears, hacked emails are posted online
* 3 people shot in vehicle in Calumet City
* Islamic State claims attack on Afghan protesters demanding electricity; 61 dead, 207 wounded
* Police say Munich shooting suspect was obsessed with mass shootings
* Democrats aren't the only tourists flocking to Philadelphia. So are heroin addicts
* David Ross developed bond with mentor Robin Ventura during Dodgers days
* What if Cubs had rented Hall of Famer Mike Piazza in '98? We'll never know
* John Fox's reputation biggest selling point of Bears' season again
* 10 seriously injured in Bishop Ford rollover
* 2 dead, 16 wounded in Chicago shootings


* Joel Erickson: Sen. Kirk must stand up for veterans' rights
* Charles Krauthammer: Notes from Cleveland: The two-part rebellion
* Rauner OKs regulating police use of cell-site simulators
* Illinois Supreme Court to consider remap ballot measure
* Rauner vetoes construction-wage, homecare-worker pay increases
* Rauner apologizes, Chicago teachers protest over 2011 email questioning their competency
* Providers: Stop gap budget won't have 'meaningful' impact
* Rauner apologizes for calling Chicago teachers illiterate
* Illinois ordered to rethink medical marijuana for migraines
* Rauner once called Chicago teachers 'virtually illiterate'


* Bentley Motors on fire on city's south side
* Community urged to populate site, download app
* Renovated foreclosed homes now for lease
* King resigns, new member appointed to District 165 Board of Education
* Koos: Town-gown relations good, improving
* Most Illinois farmers optimistic as summer progresses
* 'Inflammatory' column only makes things worse
* Bob Swisher: An impressive display of honesty
* Sandra Mason: Bindweeds got you in a bind?
* Crops looking good so far this summer


* Why property assessments are up 15%-25% in Northwest suburbs
* Schaumburg, Motorola Solutions eyeing redevelopment agreement
* Special court in Madison County helps veterans avoid jail
* Most Indiana youths convicted of murder get adult sentence
* Cousins looks to make most of chance with US basketball team

* House lawmakers overcome hurdle on key tra...
* Rodney Davis talks funding with Bloomingto...
* The agency that fought Illiana gets a new ...
* Rep. Dold takes educational cruise down Ch...
* Lawmakers decry high turnover rate of VA h...
* CBD Oil, and politics
* Simon considering state Senate bid
* Killer Congressman Tom MacArthur trying to...
* Shutdown? State may not notice
* Rep. Bob Dold

* Senators Durbin, Kirk Announce Reopening O......

* Letter: Kirk's integrity - Northwest Herald...

* Cartoon Of The Day
* Jonathan Halabi at the AFT. Day 2.
* Saw the new "Purge" movie recently
* “The Driver’s Side” – News From The Motorist’s Perspective
* “Incompetent” and “Illiterate?” Could we say governor is “Clueless?”
* Trump Formally Accepts GOP Presidential Nomination
* Clinton Picks Kaine As Running Mate
* Top CEOs Made Less In 2015, But They Still Earned 276 Times More Than Average Worker
* Five Public Hearings Scheduled On Chicago Police Reform
* Outside Review Of Chicago Law Department Recommends Improvements


* Discount Admission Tickets Available For Purchase At Area Retailers - Fair to extend purchasing hours at Emmerson Building
* Governor Announces Appointments
* New Halsted Street Bridge Finished at Byrne Interchange, Multimodal Travel, Neighborhood Connectivity Enhanced - Last of Eisenhower bridges to be completed, project moves into next phase
* No Pokemon Go access on Veteran Home’s grounds
* Governor Takes Bill Action




Hosted by MCS -- CapitolFax.com Privacy Policy -- SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax -- Advertise Here -- Mobile Version -- Contact Rich Miller