SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      Mobile Version     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact
CapitolFax.com
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
AG Madigan files blistering motion against Rutherford accuser

Tuesday, Aug 19, 2014

* AP

Illinois Attorney General Lisa Madigan wants portions of a lawsuit filed against Treasurer Dan Rutherford’s office dropped, and a court to sanction the former staff lawyer who filed it.

Madigan’s office asked a federal court on Monday to dismiss claims by Edmund Michalowski against two treasurer’s office employees and the Republican state treasurer’s office. Michalowski said the employees were involved in racketeering and retaliated against him for refusing to do political work. He also said Rutherford sexually harassed him.

Madigan calls the racketeering changes “baseless,” and said the harassment allegations involving the office weren’t “sufficiently severe or pervasive.”

* But the motion she filed goes way beyond that. For example, Michalowski apparently made some overblown allegations about Rutherford chief of staff Kyle Ham

Michalowski alleges that Ham told him that Rutherford required Treasurer Office employees to make ―donations to non-office government functions that would benefit the Rutherford and Romney campaigns. Michalowski says he gave the demanded cash to Ham at the Treasurer‘s Office in Chicago. Although for this motion the Court must accept this allegation as true, Michalowski notably does not identify the so-called ―non-office government functions‖ (staff holiday party) or say how much he paid ($50).

Who sues over a staff holiday party?

* And this

Michalowski next alleges that on July 24, 2011, Conrad sent him a text saying that the Treasurer wanted him to wear a tank top. Michalowski omits the rest of the text exchange, including his own joking comments.

Oops.

* More on the sexual harassment allegations

Michalowski‘s Title VII claim should be dismissed because he does not allege conduct that created an objectively hostile working environment under controlling precedent. For conduct to create a hostile work environment, it must be both subjectively and objectively offensive and “sufficiently severe or pervasive to alter the conditions of [the victim‘s] employment and create an abusive working environment.” […]

The Seventh Circuit has repeatedly held that conduct that was more severe than what Michalowski alleges here did not rise to the level of objective harassment as a matter of law. […]

Where courts have allowed hostile work environment cases to proceed, the alleged misconduct was substantially more severe and pervasive that what Michalowski alleges here, and usually involved incidents of unwanted touching. […]

Although the April 2011 incident allegedly involved grabbing “at” Michalowski‘s “genital area,” Michalowski does not allege that the Treasurer touched him. And even if the Treasurer‘s later alleged invitations to his home and hotel room and shoulder rub were unwanted, Michalowski does not allege that the Treasurer made any explicit sexual comments or requested any sexual activity.Taken as a whole, these sporadic incidents were not sufficiently pervasive or severe to constitute objective harassment as a matter of law.

* Regarding the RICO claim

Michalowski does not come close to alleging facts needed to establish necessary elements for a RICO claim, including: (a) actual RICO predicate acts; (b) how each defendant engaged in a pattern of racketing activity; (c) how each defendant operated the Treasurer‘s Office through a pattern of racketeering; (d) an agreement by each defendant to facilitate the completion of a RICO violation; and (e) an injury to Michalowski‘s “business or property” that was proximately caused by a RICO violation.

* 1st Amendment claim

Michalowski‘s First Amendment claim fails at the outset because, as a policymaking employee, the First Amendment does not protect his alleged lack of political support for Treasurer Rutherford. The right of public employees to associate (or not associate) politically may be legitimately constrained if the employee is in a policymaking position, has access to confidential information, or otherwise enjoys a position where political loyalty may be expected. […]

Even if Michalowski has alleged some conduct that is protected by the First Amendment, he still does not have a valid political discrimination claim against Ham or Conrad because he does not allege that Ham or Conrad took any action that was motivated to deter him from engaging in protected activity.

* And she states there was no “hit list”

Michalowski‘s hit-list allegation also does not qualify as actionable retaliation. Michalowski alleges that Rutherford and Ham (not Conrad) supposedly created a hit list of employees who would be fired for their lack of political support, but he does not allege that Rutherford and Ham created this supposed list to deter any First Amendment activity, that the list hindered his job performance or deterred him from engaging in protected conduct, or that he or anyone else was actually fired because of their lack of political support.

Even assuming that there was such a list (there was not), nothing in the law prevents the Treasurer and his chief of staff from creating a list of employees who might be terminated.

There’s lots more, so go read the whole thing.

- Posted by Rich Miller        


28 Comments
  1. - David P. Graf - Tuesday, Aug 19, 14 @ 2:48 pm:

    Is the Attorney General required to defend the state against this lawsuit? Pardon my ignorance but I would appreciate it if someone more knowledgeable could enlighten me. Thanks!


  2. - Nearly Normal - Tuesday, Aug 19, 14 @ 2:54 pm:

    “The duties of the Attorney General shall be –

    First - To appear for and represent the people of the State before the supreme court in all cases in which the State or the people
    of the State are interested.
    Second - To institute and prosecute all actions and proceedings in favor of or for the use of the State, which may be necessary in
    the execution of the duties of any State officer.

    Third - To defend all actions and proceedings against any State officer, in his official capacity, in any of the courts of this State or
    the United States…”

    foia.ilattorneygeneral.net/pdf/OAG_Brief_Description.pdf


  3. - Formerly Known As... - Tuesday, Aug 19, 14 @ 3:02 pm:

    She should e suing to have him release that “mystery report” he vowed to make public when it exonerated him.

    I wonder why the Treasurer suddenly clammed up and stashed it away somewhere?


  4. - Winning with Sheen - Tuesday, Aug 19, 14 @ 3:14 pm:

    Hahahaha….. Rutherford should be Governor.


  5. - Downstate GOP Faithless - Tuesday, Aug 19, 14 @ 3:27 pm:

    Internally staff referred to the party as the “Holiday Party Shakedown.” Apparently one year it went to essentially funding a Romney watch party during the Iowa Caucus. According to a friend who works there, last year in Chicago it was $50/person to eat Mexican in the office…curious if Bayless was brought in to prepare it. Apparently if you didn’t pay you were called by the Deputy COS, and “reminded” you owed


  6. - Responsa - Tuesday, Aug 19, 14 @ 3:36 pm:

    It seems to me that is a very serious and spirited legal defense that Lisa prepared. The request for sanctions, especially. It’s interesting to read because when the weird optics and a lot of the politics are stripped out the case does look quite a bit different, doesn’t it.


  7. - Formerly Known As... - Tuesday, Aug 19, 14 @ 3:49 pm:

    == Hahahaha… ==

    Well, if he simply released the report that he swore was going to “exonerate” him, he could have had a shot.

    You don’t think that investigation turned something up, do you? Nah. Couldn’t be.


  8. - Percival - Tuesday, Aug 19, 14 @ 4:06 pm:

    The most revealing new fact is that the employee filed before getting the required notice from the EEOC that administrative proceedings had ended. It is basic federal law that no claim under Title VII can be filed until that notice is issued, and every lawyer knows that basic federal law, but this salacious claim was filed early. It just shows that this was a political attack for the GOP Primary dressed up as a lawsuit.


  9. - Lisaspeaks - Tuesday, Aug 19, 14 @ 4:19 pm:

    So Rutherford found a friend…


  10. - chad - Tuesday, Aug 19, 14 @ 4:23 pm:

    Lisa Madigan’s motion to dismiss seems pretty strong. Would be interesting to read the memorandum supporting sanctions, as that is where some harsh arguments are liekly to appear. If this case is dismissed with financial sanctions (meaning the claim had no merit, and is “frivolous”), the action will warn politicos who attack candidates in court during the course of a campaign that they still need to have their facts and law together when filing serious cases in Federal Court — like RICO. There is just a tendency to jump too quickly during campaigns, and maybe that happened here. But this was not a ballot access challenge — this was seriously messing with people’s futures.

    There is just something about Michalowski’s approach that is too absolute and too certain. Seems like he is trying to criminalize the hurly-burly of the political and campaign world like the sadly misguided prosecuter in Austin. You get the understanding that this man understood what he was doing, benefitted from the proxmity to a potential governorship, and snapped at his promoter when he sensed a need to bail-out.

    There are those who get a kick out of having seen Rutherford take a fall here, and perhaps the action of bringing in the former FBI agent was over-the-top. It would be unexpected to give an FBI agent complete access to an entire constitutional office and not have him discover at least something amiss. So Rutherford made the right political move in holding-back that report. No need to give his naysayers another thing to crow about by revealing that someone threw a few spitballs.


  11. - walker - Tuesday, Aug 19, 14 @ 4:24 pm:

    First impressions:

    The language is strong, and defense aggressive, but that seems to be covering up some weakness in her arguments about Title VII.

    If what she claims the case law has established about Title VII is true, then the defendants’ (employers’) bar has certainly undermined the whole original intent of the law over time. The sexual harassment claims would have been a near slam dunk thirty years ago.


  12. - Al Grosboll - Tuesday, Aug 19, 14 @ 4:32 pm:

    Rich, this entire legal action and the allegations have been questionable from the beginning. I suspect when the dust settles, the case will go nowhere and the allegations will be viewed as a cheap effort to extort money.

    We have seen this type of episode play out before. Salacious allegations are made and they are just too juicy for the headline writers to ignore. After the case disappears, reporters and editors will acknowledge that maybe the allegations could have been handled with smaller headlines and greater fairness toward the accused.

    Even before this story broke, I didn’t believe Dan Rutherford was going to win the primary. But that is not the point; Dan Rutherford did not have the chance to make his case with the voters because of this story and the headlines. If this case disappears as I suspect it will, it will certainly underscore the unfairness of how sexual allegations are treated, particularly when the accuser alleges gay advances.

    Regardless of how people feel about Dan Rutherford’s politics or public service, I don’t believe this is how a public official should be treated. Let them rise or fall on their deeds and record, not on weak law suits and sleazy allegations.


  13. - chad - Tuesday, Aug 19, 14 @ 4:43 pm:

    Well said Al. In addition, there was a tendency for some in the media to use the filing of the lawsuit as a way to bring up — somewhat indirectly — the issue of sexual orientation. None of the candidates had raised that issue, so the way it was played by some was disappointing.


  14. - admin - Tuesday, Aug 19, 14 @ 4:47 pm:

    Al is right. If they have any sense of fairness left, the media attack dogs should start preparing their mea culpas and Rutherford should look into his legal options against Michaelowski and…whomever put him up to this.


  15. - Al Grosboll - Tuesday, Aug 19, 14 @ 4:53 pm:

    We should also acknowledge the Attorney General’s office in their handling of this case. Even though the players are in different political parties, the Attorney General has played fair and not hesitated to call this case for what it is. The brief is strong, refreshingly direct and convincing. Kudos to Attorney General Madigan and her staff.


  16. - Formerly Known As... - Tuesday, Aug 19, 14 @ 5:03 pm:

    == not have him discover at least something amiss ==

    Something amiss like a few boxes of missing paperclips? Or something(s) directly relating to these allegations?

    Something(s) so amiss that you would rather sit on the report and sacrifice your shot at being governor?

    Something(s) so amiss that you suddenly cancel your “exoneration” press conference within hours of receiving the report?

    That must be quite a something. Or somethings.


  17. - Formerly Known As... - Tuesday, Aug 19, 14 @ 5:04 pm:

    Speaking of which, when will the Attorney General be deciding on whether or not that report must be released?


  18. - Formerly Known As... - Tuesday, Aug 19, 14 @ 5:16 pm:

    Not that there would be any conflict of interest there.


  19. - chad - Tuesday, Aug 19, 14 @ 5:45 pm:

    My recollection is that Rutherford’s polls had collapsed by the time he might have released the results. Releasing a clean report at that moment would have only encouraged additional questions outside the scope of the investigation. There would have been no effective exoneration, and was no candidacy left to save. Releasing a report revealing “missing paperclips” would have been cause for additional riddicule at a time when his candidacy had already effectively ended.

    If serious matters are involved, those will unavoidably come out. In that case I expect he will have already passed it to the authorities.

    The AG would only be a legal advisor, and only then if asked by the Treasurer. She has no authority to order a release.


  20. - CampfireGirl - Tuesday, Aug 19, 14 @ 5:57 pm:

    So what is AG Madigan trying to say ? - that Dan Rutherford’s political career died for nothing ? wow.


  21. - Formerly Known As... - Tuesday, Aug 19, 14 @ 6:49 pm:

    == She has no authority to order a release ==

    She does if an enterprising journalist files a FOIA request for that report, the Treasurer’s office declines to release the report, and that journalist then appeals to the AG’s PAC.

    Which one assumes has likely happened by now.


  22. - Rich Miller - Tuesday, Aug 19, 14 @ 8:01 pm:

    ===She does if an enterprising journalist files a FOIA request for that report===

    FOIA doesn’t negate attorney client privilege.


  23. - David P. Graf - Tuesday, Aug 19, 14 @ 9:45 pm:

    Nearly Normal - thanks for taking the time to answer my question.


  24. - VanillaMan - Wednesday, Aug 20, 14 @ 7:45 am:

    Dan Rutherford was ripe for this kind of allegation. He did not take precaution to ensure that allegations of this type would have been easily dismissed. There have been numerous rumors regarding Mr. Rutherford and he and his advisors should not have ignored preparing a defense when these rumors began circulating again.

    Sexual misconduct allegations find their way of sticking upon certain individuals in public office. These are the same people who have reached these public offices cultivating and selling a personal image. Candidates for public office are often excruciatingly aware of how they are perceived by others. In their drive to succeed in politics, they prune themselves in how they are seen by voters.

    So for someone in a statewide elected office and a leading contender for a gubernatorial nomination, I find it very surprising that Mr. Dan Rutherford would be surprised. He shouldn’t have been. We repeatedly seen single male middle aged candidates, throughout history, being questioned regarding their sexual lives. Just as we question the number of notches which appear upon the bed post of a Kennedy, or of Bill Clinton, any public official needs to be prepared for sexual innuendoes and character attacks.

    Yet somehow, Mr. Rutherford appears to have conducted himself in a way which fails to take this part of public life seriously. He is either an amazingly trusting and naïve gentleman in a world of cutthroat Illinois politics - or he couldn’t have an honest conversation with his inner circle of supporters.

    So when these charged aired, Mr. Rutherford did not have the ability to defend himself in a way that dispersed these politically lethal revelations. Mr. Rutherford did not room each night with a parent. He did not have strict conditions placed upon those who spend time with him in private. Dan did not have a staffer who could have countered these sexual allegations in a seemingly non-biased way to clear Mr. Rutherford’s name.

    Sorry Dan, but this is how the game is played. I have heard rumors about every public official and those public officials have taken precautions and steps to defuse them. You did not. You left yourself open.

    So when the charges were filed, they fit too well with the rumors. While the facts are debated in your favor, voters aware of the innuendoes were forced to take another look at you as a statewide public official and chose to not support you.


  25. - Befuddled - Wednesday, Aug 20, 14 @ 7:47 am:

    If these accusations prove to be without merit, and it is proven that the accuser’s motive was to get a cash settlement, then the accuser should face immense penalties.

    Reputations take a long time to build up, and to have one torn down through baseless claims would be a tragedy. IF that’s what happened. If not, let the chips fall where they may.


  26. - A guy - Wednesday, Aug 20, 14 @ 8:02 am:

    Could be the start of a rebirth of his career in goverment. More careful going forward. Interesting. Hope things work out for him.


  27. - Anon - Friday, Aug 22, 14 @ 12:58 pm:


  28. - Anon - Friday, Aug 22, 14 @ 12:58 pm:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gdGAdtnjKco


Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.


* Today's video: Rauner victory lap
* Ask a silly question...
* Blagojevich arrested eight years ago today
* Pritzker, Lisa Madigan added to enemies list
* Rauner loves him some DeVos
* Good news for Mitsubishi plant?
* Cullerton to Rauner: Cut a deal with AFSCME before pension reform
* The finger-pointing continues
* Sneed: Madigan "disappointed" in Kennedy's fundraising this year
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today's edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)
* Yesterday's blog posts

Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............
<


Search This Blog...

Search the 98th General Assembly By Bill Number
(example: HB0001)

Search the 98th General Assembly By Keyword

  
* Google launches the Magic Minute Project for Android Wear
* Samsung will effectively kill the Galaxy Note 7 with a lethal software update
* Verizon won’t push Samsung’s Note 7 bricking update
* These are the most viewed ads of 2016 on YouTube
* [TA Deals] Pick up a heavily discounted Martian Notifier smartwatch
* Samsung to Brick Unreturned Galaxy Note7 Devices With Software Update
* Nomad PowerPack Review: A High-Quality Battery Pack With Tile Location Tracking

* A tale of two Sox at Winter Meetings
* Other clubs' closer search may lead to Robertson
* White Sox add righty Covey in Rule 5 Draft
* White Sox steal show at Winter Meetings
* Hahn: Sox 'very pleased' with Meetings action
* In span of day, White Sox system skyrockets
* Justice: What should White Sox do next?

...............


Main Menu
Home
Illinois
YouTube
Pundit rankings
Obama
Subscriber Content
Durbin
Burris
Blagojevich Trial
Advertising
Updated Posts
Polls

Archives
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005

Syndication

RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0
WordPress

Loading


* Anti-abortion medical providers argue against I.....
* Rauner cancels budget meeting after Dems say th.....
* Today's video: Rauner victory lap - The Capitol.....
* Anti-abortion medical providers argue against I.....
* Anti-abortion medical providers argue against I.....
* Anti-abortion medical providers argue against I.....
* Anti-abortion medical providers argue against I.....


* EPA: Tests show lead in some East Chicago drinking water
* 2 officers resign rather than face firing in 2006 beating
* Anti-abortion medical providers argue against Illinois law
* Anti-abortion medical providers argue against Illinois law
* Massachusetts man sentenced for making bomb threats
* Southern Illinois University approves campus alcohol sales
* Southern Illinois University approves campus alcohol sales
* 85-year-old Illinois woman still hunting deer since 1958
* Illinois man transforms himself from drug dealer to minister
* Cubs World Series trophy going on multi-state road trip

* $3M in emergency funds headed to Illinois community colleges
* Springfield-area veterans join pipeline protest
* Rauner asks Democrats for budget proposal, cancels meeting
* Comptroller: State employee bonuses on hold during impasse
* Rauner signs Exelon subsidy to spare 2 nuclear plants
* Rauner to sign Exelon subsidy to spare 2 nuclear plants
* Judge blocks administration from imposing contract on AFSCME
* State budget still elusive as leaders lash out
* Illinois budget still elusive as leaders lash out
* Killer of former central Illinois man sentenced to probation

* Get excited, coffee nerds—the French press can be improved
* What's at stake for Chicago if Trump comes down on sanctuary cities
* Lyft looks to dethrone Uber, starting in Chicago
* Biggest losers—and winners—in Chicago business in 2016
* Grant Achatz a la carte: Roister reviewed


* Jonathan Toews, Brent Seabrook out vs. Rangers, maybe Sunday, too
* Natalie Portman channels a first lady’s resolve in ‘Jackie’
* PODCAST: Is Bears’ Matt Barkley auditioning for another team?
* Two deaths in Cook County linked to never-before-seen opioids
* Woman hit by car, critically injured in Round Lake
* Chicago actor Audrey Morgan, seen on TV and stage, dead at 64
* Jason on a hunt: The wonderful wacky world of Bowman’s Bits
* $3 million settlement to family of teen shot by Chicago police
* UPS employee charged with trying to steal iPhones in Northbrook
* Gene Lyons: Reality TV presidency full of falsehoods


* Lincoln Park mansion for sale at record $50 million asking price
* Memorial celebration for Riot Fest co-founder Sean McKeough set for Concord Music Hall
* Northbrook police investigate death of person found Wednesday
* Why Corden, Colbert time slots should not be flipped on CBS
* Illinois Lottery's biggest scratch-offs didn't award 40% of grand prizes, Tribune finds
* How the Tribune conducted its lottery investigation
* Placing grand-prize tickets in instant games is an elaborate process
* Dexter Fowler signs with Cardinals: 'I’ll be forever grateful I was a Cub'
* New Trier alum on joining 'The Bachelor' cast: 'Some dreams do come true'
* A sour Jerry Seinfeld goes over the same old complaints at the Chicago Theatre


The widget AQL4JYGHIY powered by Feed Informer does not exist.


* Our View: Thumbs Up/Thumbs Down for the week
* $3M in emergency funds headed to Illinois community colleges
* Springfield-area veterans join pipeline protest
* Bernard Schoenburg: Bustos gets leadership post, criticizes Rauner
* Our View: Lawmakers should withdraw their lawsuit over paychecks
* George Will: The sensitivity police strike again
* Eugene Robinson: The proliferation of fake news presents real perils
* Guest Column: The Trump Administration faces extremism/terrorism
* Rauner asks Democrats for budget proposal, cancels meeting
* Comptroller: State employee bonuses on hold during impasse


* Doping report details 'institutional conspiracy' in Russia
* Details still unclear in Sesser homicide
* McConnell to coal-state Dems: Accept 4-month deal for miners
* Noon update: Snow coming, fat bikes, and deer hunter
* National Weather Service issues winter weather advisory for region
* 12-09-16 Penny for Your Thoughts
* Davenport gears up for weekend snow
* Summer Camp 2017 To Remain in Chillicothe
* Rock Island offers reminder for no parking on snow routes
* 6 new restaurants in the Peoria area


* Giacomini, McLendon among 6 Jets ruled out vs. 49ers
* Round Lake woman hit by car while crossing Route 120
* Visitors find Michigan's largest city transformed
* Officials: South Beach halts Zika's spread, but risks remain
* Vatican nativity scene includes quake-damaged church spire

* House lawmakers overcome hurdle on key tra...
* Rodney Davis talks funding with Bloomingto...
* The agency that fought Illiana gets a new ...
* Rep. Dold takes educational cruise down Ch...
* Lawmakers decry high turnover rate of VA h...
* CBD Oil, and politics
* Simon considering state Senate bid
* Killer Congressman Tom MacArthur trying to...
* Shutdown? State may not notice
* Rep. Bob Dold

* Dick Durbin, Lindsey Graham Unveil Bill To......
* US Lawmakers Rip DoD Over $125 Billion in ......
* US Lawmakers Rip DoD Over $125B in Waste -......

* Sen. Rubio Introduces Bill to Impose Nonnu......

* It's been 8 years already
* Maryville Pedestrian Bridge Likely To Be Removed This Weekend
* Living to0 long.
* Living too long.
* Illinois REALTORS® sponsors IDCEO reception as part of global outreach efforts
* Zombies in Washington (an art project).
* Trump to Harry Reid, “You’re awesome.”
* Rauner’s labor board ruling on AFSCME. Do you believe in magic, coincidences and Santa Claus?
* That Chicago property tax levy? It’s going to the banks, not CPS students.
* A “Kennedy” for Illinois governor; is GOP taking notion too seriously?


* Governor’s Export Awards Recipients Announced
* Governor Signs Legislation to Protect Jobs, Ratepayers and Taxpayers
* Give The Gift Of A Lifetime With A College Illinois!® 529 Prepaid Tuition Plan - College Illinois! can help limit or even eliminate future student loan debt
* Illinois Department of Veterans’ Affairs Hosts 75th Pearl Harbor Remembrance Day Ceremony
* IDHR Issues Reminder of Fair Housing Rights During Holiday Season - State law prohibits targeted, discriminatory restrictions on decorations and celebrations




      Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller