59 Comments - Truthteller - Thursday, Feb 22, 18 @ 10:12 am: Biss’s holier than thou attitude is wearing thin. Saying one is a “progressive” doesn’t make it so - Not It - Thursday, Feb 22, 18 @ 10:13 am: I interpreted the quote to mean that Rauner shook down the contribution, but I sorta’ like Biss so maybe I read what I wanted to. - low level - Thursday, Feb 22, 18 @ 10:14 am: “Holier than thou”. Exactly. Since Sen Biss has been in office for a long enough time now, can someone point to any legislation he has worked on that was so progressive in nature? Im not concerned anymore w what he says. What has he done? - Retired Educator - Thursday, Feb 22, 18 @ 10:14 am: Are we sure Biss “The Pension Thief, didn’t steal the money, and call it a contribution? He tried that with my retirement. He wanted to steal it and call it reform. - Anon0091 - Thursday, Feb 22, 18 @ 10:16 am: Glad someone finally noticed. Biss asks, “is this an election or an auction” all the time. But he’s the one taking dozens of checks for $50,000 and more ($250,000 is currently the highest bid). He has every right to and I don’t blame him, but the sanctimony is a bit much. - Swift - Thursday, Feb 22, 18 @ 10:18 am: ==* But… did that really come out of the mouth of a Daniel Biss person?== I had to go back and check who was being quoted on this one. Wow, truthful, but wow. - Actual Red - Thursday, Feb 22, 18 @ 10:19 am: This is the danger of positioning yourself as the grassroots/middle class/progressive candidate — campaign contributions that you a)probably need and b)would probably not even be noticed if they were given to other candidates can be used against you. It’s a problem of his own making, for sure. That said, running from the left was always Biss’s only real shot, so that all comes with the territory. - Anon163 - Thursday, Feb 22, 18 @ 10:21 am: Did Me. Elliott admit that the Gov Office decides this issue and that it is natural that campaign “donations “ are actually payoffs??? I think he did. Great Comms. Director!! - wordslinger - Thursday, Feb 22, 18 @ 10:22 am: Biss spokesman Tom Elliott: “His company, Final Finish, is a medical marijuana group so it makes sense that they would give money to the Governor who controls the outcome of their industry in Illinois.” Sector 7G Organ-bank Homer Simpson: “Wait — did I say that out loud?” - Shytown - Thursday, Feb 22, 18 @ 10:23 am: Biss is a hypocrite who thinks the bar he’s set in this race applies to all but him. - Honeybear - Thursday, Feb 22, 18 @ 10:25 am: It is progressive elitist pietism He got caught in his own Perfidy - Actual Red - Thursday, Feb 22, 18 @ 10:26 am: @low level https://votesmart.org/candidate/key-votes/101726/daniel-biss#.Wo7tu6jwbIU From 2017 alone, sponsored and cosponsored – Feb. 10, 2017 HB 3904 Requires Gender-Responsive Practices in Women’s Prisons, Co-sponsor Feb. 10, 2017 SB 1933 Authorizes Automatic Voter Registration, Sponsor Feb. 9, 2017 SB 1657 Authorizes State Level Licenses for Gun Dealers Senate, Co-sponsor Feb. 9, 2017 SB 1761 Prohibits “Gay Panic” Defense Senate, Co-sponsor Feb. 1, 2017 HB 1785 Authorizes Birth Certificate Changes for Transgender People House Co-sponsor Jan. 18, 2017 SB 81 Establishes New Minimum Wage Senate Co-sponsor Jan. 11, 2017 HB 40 Amends Restrictions on Publicly Funded Abortions House Co-sponsor Jan. 11, 2017 SB 31 Establishes the Illinois TRUST Act. Senate Co-sponsor Please at least do a cursory google search before making comments like this. Yes, pension reform is a genuinely big deal, but it’s not like the guy has no progressive record. - Truthteller - Thursday, Feb 22, 18 @ 10:28 am: -Actual red Given Biss’s establishment credentials if he were to get elected, he would likely continue to run from the left and back to the arms of his wealthy North ashore base - Sigh - Thursday, Feb 22, 18 @ 10:29 am: —Here’s Biss campaign’s explanation, from spokesman Tom Elliott: “There’s no conspiracy theory. Schuler personally gives to a lot of Dems. His company, Final Finish, is a medical marijuana group so it makes sense that they would give money to the Governor who controls the outcome of their industry in Illinois.”— Well, Tom… campaign contributions is this reason why Biss supports legalizing cannabis? And has Cannabiss signs? Interesting that Biss recently became a co-sponsor of the cannabis/opioid bil. Oh, those darn progressive candidates that call for transparency and then deflect when asked a question. - low level - Thursday, Feb 22, 18 @ 10:30 am: From 2017… when he decided to run for Governor. Got it. He “alone” sponsored HB 40? Please do us a favor and learn some background before posting comments like this. - Ron - Thursday, Feb 22, 18 @ 10:34 am: I want Biss to come in 3rd. His transaction tax idea is the worst and would destroy Chicago. - low level - Thursday, Feb 22, 18 @ 10:34 am: And, actually- I do better than Google. I use the GA website. Here are the bills that Biss was primary sponsor of since 2017. Go to IL GA , then Biss, then click on “Bills was primary sponsor”. Not much there in terms of passage. http://ilga.gov/senate/SenatorBills.asp?MemberID=2404&Primary=True - SaulGoodman - Thursday, Feb 22, 18 @ 10:38 am: **He “alone” sponsored HB 40? Please do us a favor and learn some background before posting comments like this.** That’t a good point. Maybe someone can point out something similar to JB, who claims credit for passing HB40. But Biss has passed a lot of very good progressive bills, including: Ban on conversion therapy Secure Choice Act Public workers comp program (got vetoed by Rauner) Equal Pay (got vetoed by Rauner) Several good privacy bills Small donor campaign finance bill Student loan bill of rights Carried interest loophole Etc, etc, etc. - Galena Guy - Thursday, Feb 22, 18 @ 10:46 am: Hey Ron, care to explain why a transaction tax would “destroy” Chicago? - Arsenal - Thursday, Feb 22, 18 @ 10:53 am: This is a good illustration of the fundamental frustration of Biss. He’s been a perfectly normal legislator. He plays the game as he needs to, he votes his district, maybe he’s a little more willing to cut things than I’d be, but it’s a neighborhood play. But he’s running as the guy casting the money-changers out of the temple, and that’s just not his record. - TKMH - Thursday, Feb 22, 18 @ 10:53 am: For further reading on why a transaction tax is bad policy: https://www.ft.com/content/b9b40fee-9236-11e2-851f-00144feabdc0 - Anon0091 - Thursday, Feb 22, 18 @ 11:00 am: “But he’s running as the guy casting the money-changers out of the temple, and that’s just not his record.” Bingo. This. Exactly. - Amalia - Thursday, Feb 22, 18 @ 11:01 am: “I want Biss to come in third.” yes. his holier than thou attitude is not new. starting his career in politics his attitude towards some who had been involved long before…volunteers/staffers…was that he knows more. arrogance. - @misterjayem - Thursday, Feb 22, 18 @ 11:03 am: Bissness as usual. – MrJM - low level - Thursday, Feb 22, 18 @ 11:15 am: So we have holier than thou Biss/ record mixed lets say. Pritzker? Donating to Democrats and progressive causes nationwide since before Biss ever thought about running for office. He’s criticized by Biss bros for being wealthy. Indeed he is. He could have sat on it but hasnt. Anyone remember the Leadership 2000 conference he had in 1993? Or the DL21C group he started that gave young Dems interested in politics a way to get involved? But no.. according to Biss he’s no better than Trump or Rauner. Sorry Dan. Not going to fly. - Whatever - Thursday, Feb 22, 18 @ 11:27 am: Great insight Rich. I nearly choked when I read the Biss’ spokesman’s response. Yikes. Apparently making campaign donations to gain access to elected officials whose official actions may affect your business “makes sense” to the self-styled reformer candidate. Agreed — there’s probably nothing here, and it’s all legal and part of how the system works. But it smacks of “pay-to-play” and crony capitalism. When the system works for Biss, I guess it’s OK. When it helps his opponents, not so much. - Honeybear - Thursday, Feb 22, 18 @ 11:29 am: Ron must be a hedge fund manager to think that s transaction tax would destroy Chicago. God that’s so funny. The immense gated community privilege Necessary to say that. Your world would just come to an end would it? Bless your golden heart - Frankly - Thursday, Feb 22, 18 @ 11:40 am: To expect Biss to reject contributions like this when he’s up against one candidate who has spent $60 million on his campaign and one who regularly contributes a quarter of a million to his own campaign is just absurd. Biss rightly criticizes the campaign finance system and points out his disadvantage under it. But he is trying to win a primary under that system. To turn down that money would be useless martyrdom. Come on. This is the real world. - Arsenal - Thursday, Feb 22, 18 @ 11:45 am: ==To expect Biss to reject contributions like this when he’s up against one candidate who has spent $60 million on his campaign and one who regularly contributes a quarter of a million to his own campaign is just absurd.== That would hold up a little better if it hadn’t been for LIFT PAC last year. Yes, it’s the real world, so maybe Biss should get real. - downstate commissioer - Thursday, Feb 22, 18 @ 11:47 am: TKMH - Thursday, Feb 22, 18 @ 10:53 am: For further reading on why a transaction tax is bad policy: https://www.ft.com/content/b9b So I have to pay to read one article in a webpaper that I will never read again? - The wind - Thursday, Feb 22, 18 @ 11:57 am: Been saying for a very long time that Dan Biss is playing a role on a stage in the high school play. MGM served his purposes he was great with MJ and I am doesn’t is terrible. he’s a progressive with one group of Moderat with another. Nice to see some of his double play he’s a progressive with one group of moderate with another. He was wealthy growing up and hobnobbing with the elite but now he give up teachin and is a middle-class Joe. - wordslinger - Thursday, Feb 22, 18 @ 11:58 am: –I want Biss to come in 3rd. His transaction tax idea is the worst and would destroy Chicago.– Curious than that a Wall St./LaSalle St macher like Schuler — who made his fortune in high-frequency trading, literally thousands of trades a second — would drop $250K on Biss. How many trades a second do you make, Ron? Not counting Pokemon cards? - Anon0091 - Thursday, Feb 22, 18 @ 11:59 am: “To turn down that money would be useless martyrdom.” Nobody is arguing that he should turn down the money. It’s not the money. It’s the sanctimony. - TKMH - Thursday, Feb 22, 18 @ 12:02 pm: ==downstate commissioer - Thursday, Feb 22, 18 @ 11:47 am== http://www.businessinsider.com/sweden-explains-why-a-european-financial-transaction-tax-wont-work-2011-9 Here is a link to an article with the same gist that isn’t hidden behind a paywall. - Ron - Thursday, Feb 22, 18 @ 12:03 pm: The exchanges would leave tomorrow with Biss’s transaction tax. Do you understand the number of jobs and $s they bring to Chicago? - Ron - Thursday, Feb 22, 18 @ 12:08 pm: CME leaving is guaranteed with a FTT. I’m not a trader. - Ron - Thursday, Feb 22, 18 @ 12:12 pm: - downstate commissioer - Thursday, Feb 22, 18 @ 11:47 am: The FInancial Times is literally the best business paper in the world. - Anon0091 - Thursday, Feb 22, 18 @ 12:12 pm: Unaccustomed as I am to agreeing with Ron, he’s 100% right on the financial transactions tax. We don’t have pits anymore that you must participate in physically. They are mostly electronic but the jobs are still here largely as a vestige of the past. How long would they stay with this kind of tax. This is another one of those policies that sound great in theory but not so much in the real world. - wordslinger - Thursday, Feb 22, 18 @ 12:17 pm: –I’m not a trader.– No kidding? You seem so well-informed on the industry. And if you had followed Illinois politics for ten seconds, you’d know that any trading tax would be as dead as Dillinger the moment it was introduced. Those guys have Exelon/Edison clout. I’m quite certain Biss knows that, too. So, maybe not so sincere on that proposal….. - Gimme A Break - Thursday, Feb 22, 18 @ 12:21 pm: Come on, Rich. The “auction” thing is a dig at the billionaires in the race paying their own freight for the entire campaign. Totally fair. Your logic (and other commenters’) contributes to the notion that candidates in the Wild West that is Illinois campaign finance that your either riding into town with a Gatling gun or a pea shooter and nothing in between. I’m a J.B. supporter, BTW. What’s fair is fair. - Anon - Thursday, Feb 22, 18 @ 12:28 pm: Have to say that I’ve definitely picked up on a pretty significant anti-Biss/pro-Pritzker bias from Rich over the past few weeks. Thought this blog was better than that. - City Zen - Thursday, Feb 22, 18 @ 12:31 pm: ==Curious than that a Wall St./LaSalle St macher like Schuler — who made his fortune in high-frequency trading, literally thousands of trades a second== How many HF trades today? He’s not in that game anymore. - Retired Educator - Thursday, Feb 22, 18 @ 12:33 pm: Anon; There are other blogs, why don’t you go find one. Insulting Mr. Miller is unseemly. - City Zen - Thursday, Feb 22, 18 @ 12:43 pm: ==Do you understand the number of jobs and $s they bring to Chicago?== Ron, most folks here think the trading industry is just like the Duke’s from Trading Places. They have no idea or appreciation (probably the latter) of the massive IT footprint left by the trading industry. Thousands of well-paid and intelligent analysts, developers, network engineers, etc working in a non-stop innovation cycle and building a well-paid support structure around them. All contributing mightily to the state’s tax base. Apparently, a FTT is worth risking all this…for those who do not value risk. If a FTT is to ever really work, it should be implemented at the national level, not local. But then, no one would support it because someone else would get the money. - Anonymously - Thursday, Feb 22, 18 @ 12:55 pm: Ironic that Schuler, who made his money as a high frequency stock trader at Getco, supports Mr. LaSalle Street tax. Anyone who thinks Biss is going to be some sort of ‘change agent’ is lying to themselves - he’s an career politician and an opportunist with a long, long, long list of speaking one way and voting another. - @misterjayem - Thursday, Feb 22, 18 @ 1:02 pm: “Have to say that I’ve definitely picked up on a pretty significant anti-Biss/pro-Pritzker bias from Rich over the past few weeks.” There’s a striking disconnect between Biss’ campaign and his extensive record in Springfield. Biss has failed to acknowledge the gap between the two, much less to explain it. There is a similar conflict between the posture of Biss’ campaign and some of its actions. These inconsistencies are noteworthy. And they are not the fault of Rich Miller. – MrJM - wordslinger - Thursday, Feb 22, 18 @ 1:27 pm: –They are mostly electronic but the jobs are still here largely as a vestige of the past.– There are very few jobs, and more are eliminated every day. Traders stay here for proximity to the pipes. The thousands of support jobs that made the Board of Trade on LaSalle and the Merc on Wacker jump are long gone. So too, are the many great dive bars, take-out joints and vice-support services that used to serve them. It was a blast while it lasted. But the loss of jobs had nothing to do with any government policies, but the inevitable march of technology that started when Leo started Globex. - wordslinger - Thursday, Feb 22, 18 @ 1:38 pm: –How many HF trades today? He’s not in that game anymore.– Sorry, I didn’t know you were his business manager with intimate knowledge of all his financial dealings. Good work, is it? For those who can’t pick up on a point without a two-by-four to the head, I don’t think a guy like Schuler would be into Biss for a quarter million if he thought a trading tax was a serious or viable proposal. Maybe some of you missed it, but in the depths of the Great Recession the LaSalle Street crew got a one-off massive tax break when the state was bleeding revenue. That’s clout, and they’ve still got it. - wordslinger - Thursday, Feb 22, 18 @ 1:49 pm: –“Have to say that I’ve definitely picked up on a pretty significant anti-Biss/pro-Pritzker bias from Rich over the past few weeks.”– Yeah, it’s been all sunshine and lollipops for Pritzker day after day at the ol’ Cap Fax. Another victim heard from. Welcome to the NFL, rookie. - Rich Miller - Thursday, Feb 22, 18 @ 2:12 pm: ===sunshine and lollipops=== Hadn’t heard that in a while. lol - Rich Miller - Thursday, Feb 22, 18 @ 2:13 pm: ===pretty significant anti-Biss/pro-Pritzker bias=== When your campaign endorses pay to play, expect a call-out. - SAP - Thursday, Feb 22, 18 @ 2:23 pm: ==From 2017 alone, sponsored and cosponsored== The word “alone” modifies 2017, not sponsored. That said, all but one of those were co-sponsored and it cherry-picks from the period after he declared himself a capital “P” Progressive. - Ron - Thursday, Feb 22, 18 @ 2:34 pm: I’m quite certain Biss knows that, too. So, maybe not so sincere on that proposal….. Which makes Biss even worse. - Ron - Thursday, Feb 22, 18 @ 2:36 pm: Can’t wait to see Biss take third. - Veil of Ignorance - Thursday, Feb 22, 18 @ 2:40 pm: I think team Biss thinks it’s okay because the money came AFTER they independently took a position on the issue. That being said, it’s a fair criticism and not the best comms response I’ve seen. - wordslinger - Thursday, Feb 22, 18 @ 3:00 pm: ===sunshine and lollipops=== Hadn’t heard that in a while. lol– A vagrant memory from a childhood on the farm, when the only media was what you could pick up from the antenna. You watched and listened to what came in kinda clear. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XQmBXEZEYtg - Generic Drone - Thursday, Feb 22, 18 @ 7:01 pm: Is Biss taking a page from Rauners playbook? Nope, Biss aint got no money. - Faux Populi - Thursday, Feb 22, 18 @ 7:10 pm: Remember that Biss set aside his constituional oath to pursue the anti-worker agenda. - NorthsideNoMore - Friday, Feb 23, 18 @ 2:50 am: Rons not wrong…with the all electronic trading and the number of jobs already lost in the industry, giving the traders a good reason to leave not well thought out. The transaction tax is exactly that. Traders are gamblers and if someone wants to throw down I doubt they’ll be the first to blink. Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.