Capitol Fax.com - Your Illinois News Radar » Moms on an independent mission
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      About     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact Rich Miller
CapitolFax.com
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
Moms on an independent mission

Tuesday, Nov 13, 2018 - Posted by Rich Miller

* NPR Illinois

Jean Sinzdak — associate director of the nonpartisan Center for American Women and Politics — says Tuesday’s election saw a number of firsts.

“Voters in places where that happened were really hungry for a different sort of candidate,” she said. “For someone who was not the quote un-quote typical elected official, which has historically been older and white and male.” […]

Sinzdak says nationwide women running for office ignored traditional advice of downplaying the fact that they were mothers or had kids at home.

For [Democratic House candidate Joyce Mason], it was a key theme of her campaign; she called herself a “mom on a mission.”

Sinzdak says that’s good news for future elections.

“What that means long-term is that it might open the playing field for more women and other newcomers to the political process to not feel like they had to fit a certain mold,” she said.

Maybe this is a new thing elsewhere, but it’s not new here. Way back in 1994, House Republican Leader Lee Daniels recruited a bunch of suburban PTA/school board moms to run against Speaker Madigan’s Democrats. They highlighted their personal lives and it worked so well that Madigan himself adopted the practice, which continues to this day. Democratic Rep. Michelle Mussman’s 2010 campaign slogan was none other than: “Mom on a mission.”

* What is different this year is the refreshing independence of so many of the latest suburban women candidates, Mason included (coincidentally, I told subscribers about Mason earlier today).

       

17 Comments
  1. - Anon E Moose - Tuesday, Nov 13, 18 @ 11:01 am:

    Speaker Madigan and the moms he controls


  2. - wordslinger - Tuesday, Nov 13, 18 @ 11:05 am:

    –Sinzdak says nationwide women running for office ignored traditional advice of downplaying the fact that they were mothers or had kids at home.–

    When was that “the traditional advice?” Doesn’t ring a bell with me.


  3. - Oswego Willy - Tuesday, Nov 13, 18 @ 11:18 am:

    The 94 and the 96 cycle following you had a real emergence where the map allowed Daniels and Pate to find the right candidates, and the timing, maps, and politics brought the “Moms” into a position to get Daniels the elusive gavel.

    Like Skyhook, MJM learned what beat him, and the recruitment of moms and strong women, especially in districts where the Dem trending was going to continue, allowed Madigan to beat that “Senate Red” map by following up Daniels’ first strike.

    That time frame, 96 through 2002, the recruitment avd races on the House side as the map morphed in Dem ways, the GOP found itself lost, when it seemingly abandoned the “mom” thoughts in some places, or conceded districts they felt were not going to turn back to the GOP.

    I keep going back to that 1994 time.

    It’s not wistful nostalgia, but it’s a look back to see what could be ahead, with leadership willing to build around all Republicans, not divide a party so grifters can make their monies off the believers of phony.

    Maureen Murphy and Rosemary Mulligan.

    Those type of pairings in the HGOP? Hmm.


  4. - Soccermom - Tuesday, Nov 13, 18 @ 11:20 am:

    Actually, Word, women candidates often are told to soft-pedal their mom credentials — and polling often backs that up.


  5. - Blue Dog Dem - Tuesday, Nov 13, 18 @ 11:21 am:

    Time will only tell if these newly elected officials maintain their independence.seems to me i have heard those claims before. But ever the optimist, i will withhold judgement until shown otherwise.


  6. - NoGifts - Tuesday, Nov 13, 18 @ 11:31 am:

    Studies have shown that women with children are viewed as less competent and less dedicated than women without children.


  7. - wordslinger - Tuesday, Nov 13, 18 @ 11:44 am:

    –Actually, Word, women candidates often are told to soft-pedal their mom credentials — and polling often backs that up.–

    Did not know that. Seems counter-intuitive to me. Raising kids is the toughest job out there, for men and women. You sure learn how to say “no.”


  8. - Soccermom - Tuesday, Nov 13, 18 @ 11:57 am:

    Word — yeah, I was surprised too. But it’s a real thing.

    Consider all the times that women candidates are asked, “Who is going to look after your children while you’re in (Spi, DC, whatever)?”


  9. - Archpundit - Tuesday, Nov 13, 18 @ 12:25 pm:

    Soccermom & NoGifts are spot on. It might seem counterintuitive, but it translates into being seen as more traditional and therefore less thoughtful or motivated. That is ridiculous, of course, but it crosses over from the workplace.


  10. - Amalia - Tuesday, Nov 13, 18 @ 12:26 pm:

    I’ve never seen Democratic women soft pedal their mom status. In fact, I’m tired of hearing that women act a certain way “because we’re all moms.” you don’t hear men say “because we’re all fathers.” display brains, whatever your gender, or reproductive status.


  11. - NoGifts - Tuesday, Nov 13, 18 @ 3:09 pm:

    Amalia - how many photos & appearances of male politicians have you seen with their families around them? Even the supreme court nominee brought his wife and kids to the hearing??? Tons, and you don’t notice them claiming to be fathers because of the cultural bias. Fathers are viewed as successful and competent and therefore you expect to see them in advertisements and don’t question the reason. The family is an asset. “because we’re all moms” drives us all crazy because we know it decreases the candidate’s chances of success. I’m trying to think family photos with female candidates? No, we don’t want to see that. The only one I recall playing that up was the “momma bear” Sarah Palin.


  12. - Rich Miller - Tuesday, Nov 13, 18 @ 3:10 pm:

    ===“because we’re all moms” drives us all crazy because we know it decreases the candidate’s chances of success===

    https://vimeo.com/16287962


  13. - Mike Murray - Tuesday, Nov 13, 18 @ 4:13 pm:

    As further evidence that “Mom on a Mission” is an old concept; Mussman’s yard signs, mailers, campaign lit, etc. no longer had that slogan in 2018. (They did use that slogan from 2010-2016) I wasn’t involved in the decision making behind the slogan change, but I live in Schaumburg, and I can tell you that the general feeling among local politicos was that the slogan had gotten stale and needed to be retired because it was too old.

    After a certain number of terms, it’s kinda like, “Are you still on that mission? Seems never ending…” haha

    None of this is a knock on Mussman, I am one of her constituents she does a great job. One of the hardest working reps around. But yea, “Mom on a Mission” definitely not new messaging/strategy.


  14. - Anonymous - Tuesday, Nov 13, 18 @ 5:07 pm:

    Someday, someone will write a Robert Caro-style biography of Mike Madigan. His political career deserves a good, long book.


  15. - NoGifts - Tuesday, Nov 13, 18 @ 5:17 pm:

    Success despite the slogan. Not because of it. :)


  16. - wordslinger - Tuesday, Nov 13, 18 @ 5:54 pm:

    –Someday, someone will write a Robert Caro-style biography of Mike Madigan.–

    LOL, yeah, maybe some big brain, great writer like Kass or Katrina.

    Caro’s been at it on LBJ for forty years, has published four door-stoppers and he just got past Dallas.


  17. - Moms Running - Thursday, Nov 15, 18 @ 11:38 am:

    It really is a ‘thing’ backed up by research. But moms are bucking against it and as moms ourselves, we think it’s a move in the right direction. Based on our own races—both as moms of young to school-aged children—we created Moms Running (www.moms-running.com) to help more moms transition into political life.


Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.


* Pritzker calls some of Bears proposals 'probably non-starters,' refuses to divert state dollars intended for other purposes
* Isabel’s afternoon roundup
* Friends of the Parks responds to Bears’ lakefront stadium proposal
* It’s just a bill
* Judge rejects state motion to move LaSalle Veterans' Home COVID deaths lawsuit to Court of Claims
* Learn something new every day
* Protect Illinois Hospitality – Vote No On House Bill 5345
* Need something to read? Try these Illinois-related books
* Illinois Hospitals Are Driving Economic Activity Across Illinois: $117.7B Annually And 445K Jobs
* Today's quotables
* Open thread
* Isabel’s morning briefing
* Live coverage
* Yesterday's stories

Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............


Loading


Main Menu
Home
Illinois
YouTube
Pundit rankings
Obama
Subscriber Content
Durbin
Burris
Blagojevich Trial
Advertising
Updated Posts
Polls

Archives
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005

Syndication

RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0




Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller