Capitol Fax.com - Your Illinois News Radar


Latest Post | Last 10 Posts | Archives


Previous Post: Chicago GOP cries foul over Democratic interference
Next Post: Another one?

*** LIVE COVERAGE *** Leaders’ meeting

Posted in:

* The festivities begin at 2:30. Watch online…

* BlueRoomStream

* CMS Streaming Video

* CMS Streaming Audio Only

* CMS video available for download

* And your ScribbleLive thingy


posted by Rich Miller
Tuesday, Dec 1, 15 @ 1:41 pm

Comments

  1. So what’s the over/under for the number of minutes after the summit is over before Rauner says something to the media that details the whole thing?

    Comment by Test Tuesday, Dec 1, 15 @ 1:56 pm

  2. SuperStars thinkin’ they use the meetin’ as cover for the expandin’ non state funds approp bill….think of it as the $3 billion payout for the GOPies and Dunkin’ who helped SuperStars avoid defeat on child care.
    BTW SuperStars continue to show love fir higher ed by givin’ $0.00

    Comment by Anonin' Tuesday, Dec 1, 15 @ 2:02 pm

  3. Details was supposed to be derails

    Comment by Test Tuesday, Dec 1, 15 @ 2:13 pm

  4. Looks like Amanda has man hands.

    Comment by Bogey Golfer Tuesday, Dec 1, 15 @ 2:19 pm

  5. What’s the big deal? The governor has been saying for months that negotiations have been ongoing and progress was being made?

    Was that not true?

    Comment by wordslinger Tuesday, Dec 1, 15 @ 2:23 pm

  6. This music CMS is using on their feed until it starts makes you want to take up arms and storm the bastille.

    Comment by Give Me A Break Tuesday, Dec 1, 15 @ 2:24 pm

  7. I already miss the test pattern.

    – MrJM

    Comment by @MisterJayEm Tuesday, Dec 1, 15 @ 2:31 pm

  8. I feel like I’m about to watch a bad training video.

    Comment by ChicagoVinny Tuesday, Dec 1, 15 @ 2:33 pm

  9. This is just awkward.

    Comment by Under Influenced Tuesday, Dec 1, 15 @ 2:33 pm

  10. Sometimes he drops those G’s and sometimes he doesn’t. Really makes you wonder if not using G’s is authentic.

    Comment by Willie Stark Tuesday, Dec 1, 15 @ 2:34 pm

  11. Yikes, the Speaker is so far away from the group…

    Comment by Oswego Willy Tuesday, Dec 1, 15 @ 2:34 pm

  12. During Rauner’s opening remarks, MJM both yawned and blew his nose.

    But I’m sure those were merely examples of the spontaneous and not at all deliberate behaviors for which Mr. Madigan is famous.

    – MrJM

    Comment by @MisterJayEm Tuesday, Dec 1, 15 @ 2:36 pm

  13. ===Really makes you wonder if not using G’s is authentic. ===

    LOL

    Comment by Rich Miller Tuesday, Dec 1, 15 @ 2:38 pm

  14. Nice of the governor to dictate how they all will address the press after the meeting.

    The choppy feed is distracting.

    Comment by Politix Tuesday, Dec 1, 15 @ 2:39 pm

  15. The video keeps hanging up on every phrase, like the speaker is waiting for his remarks to be translated for the others. very distracting.

    Comment by anonny Tuesday, Dec 1, 15 @ 2:39 pm

  16. The Speaker at the podium, Leader Durkin seated. I’m already distracted and confused by the POV shift

    Comment by Ace Laredo Tuesday, Dec 1, 15 @ 2:39 pm

  17. Maybe each of the 5 will adopt a different POV and pose to liven things up.

    Comment by Ace Laredo Tuesday, Dec 1, 15 @ 2:41 pm

  18. Use Blueroom stream. Much smoother. The CMS stream is worthless.

    Comment by Frenchie Mendoza Tuesday, Dec 1, 15 @ 2:41 pm

  19. Mr. Durkin, finger-pointing is not helping!

    Comment by Anon221 Tuesday, Dec 1, 15 @ 2:41 pm

  20. Durkin: “Governor, you have been reasonable from the start”

    Pure comedy.

    Comment by Politix Tuesday, Dec 1, 15 @ 2:45 pm

  21. This is Christopher Guest movie levels of uncomfortable.

    Comment by Served Tuesday, Dec 1, 15 @ 2:47 pm

  22. Good for Cullerton for chastising Durkin’s posturing!

    Comment by Anon221 Tuesday, Dec 1, 15 @ 2:47 pm

  23. Cullerton FTW!

    Great speech.

    Comment by Frenchie Mendoza Tuesday, Dec 1, 15 @ 2:48 pm

  24. Oh my God……President Cullerton is killing me

    “Even if I wanted to surrender to you, how would I do that?”

    is like “One dog is going one way, one dog is going the other way, and this guy over here is saying ‘hey, what do you want from me’?

    Comment by Ace Laredo Tuesday, Dec 1, 15 @ 2:48 pm

  25. Durkin is a clear front-runner for the Razzie for Worst Suck Up in a Lap Dog Role.

    Comment by wordslinger Tuesday, Dec 1, 15 @ 2:48 pm

  26. “If it’s all the same, I would rather forego my prepared remarks so we can just get to work.”

    - No One

    Comment by Dirty Red Tuesday, Dec 1, 15 @ 2:49 pm

  27. Madigan made a case… Totally cool.

    Durkin made the Gov’s case… Totally cool, too.

    Cullerton’s just “talkin’ to us”.., good on the Senate President.

    Comment by Oswego Willy Tuesday, Dec 1, 15 @ 2:49 pm

  28. Radogno had weeks to prep and all she has is the toenail analogy? Cede your time to Cullerton!

    Comment by LizPhairTax Tuesday, Dec 1, 15 @ 2:49 pm

  29. Curious that the Speaker is the only one who used a podium! Imagine the look on BVR and Z’s faces when that request came in . . . .

    Comment by Sage Tuesday, Dec 1, 15 @ 2:49 pm

  30. Cullerton is the most authentic person in the room.

    Comment by Politix Tuesday, Dec 1, 15 @ 2:50 pm

  31. Sage - why not?! He’s the Speaker. I’m surprised he didn’t also demand a Saputo’s sampler platter and a fresh apple driven in directly from HyVee.

    Comment by Team Sleep Tuesday, Dec 1, 15 @ 2:52 pm

  32. Why did Rauner make the only woman leader go last? Chivalry died today.

    Comment by 360 Degree Turnaround Tuesday, Dec 1, 15 @ 2:53 pm

  33. Durkin: “Revenue is not the answer. It will never be the answer.”

    This guy doesn’t even know what the question is, let alone the answer. Puh-leeze.

    Comment by Roamin' Numeral Tuesday, Dec 1, 15 @ 2:54 pm

  34. ==Why did Rauner make the only woman leader go last? Chivalry died today==

    You don’t lead off with your anchor leg, you finish with it

    Comment by Anonymous Tuesday, Dec 1, 15 @ 2:56 pm

  35. How about some solutions, Radogno? What a bore.

    Comment by Politix Tuesday, Dec 1, 15 @ 2:56 pm

  36. A way to turn this off would be nice.

    Comment by Anon Tuesday, Dec 1, 15 @ 2:57 pm

  37. Rauner: “Chicago is part of the state.”

    Thanks, Bruce.

    Comment by The End Is Near Tuesday, Dec 1, 15 @ 2:58 pm

  38. Welcome to The Apprentice: Illinois Edition.
    Starting:
    Donald Trump: played by Governor Bruce Rauner
    Ivanka Trump: played by Leader Rodogno
    Piers Morgan: played by President Cullerton
    Omarosa: played by Leader Durkin
    Donald Trump Jr. played by Speaker Madigan

    Theme song: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f9zraS8EKw4

    Money, money, money, money, money [2x]
    Some people got to have it
    Do things, Do things, do bad things with it
    Dollar bills, yall
    For that lean, mean, mean green
    Almighty dollar
    Talkin about money
    Give me a nickel, brother can you spare a dime
    Money can drive some people out of their minds
    Money, money, money, money, money

    Comment by The Apprentice Tuesday, Dec 1, 15 @ 2:58 pm

  39. Anon - it’s simple. Just click the “x” on the tab.

    Comment by Team Sleep Tuesday, Dec 1, 15 @ 3:00 pm

  40. ==How about some solutions, Radogno? What a bore.==

    As opposed to Madigan/Cullerton’s “solution” of “let’s just pass the same type of budget as we have for the last few decades, then put off any other real changes until later. Rrrrrrriggt

    Comment by Anonymous Tuesday, Dec 1, 15 @ 3:01 pm

  41. Radogno…totally cool with her.

    Governor… Clearly focused on rebuttal of Madigan.

    So… That’s that.

    Comment by Oswego Willy Tuesday, Dec 1, 15 @ 3:02 pm

  42. Sen. Radogno ordered the Big Word Salad today.

    Lots of stuff thrown together haphazardly, but strangely unfulfilling.

    Comment by wordslinger Tuesday, Dec 1, 15 @ 3:03 pm

  43. Rauner-Back-dooring the RTW and collective bargaining into the property tax freeze. So… not three items after all. Back to the top five on the TAR (TurnAround Reforms).

    Comment by Anon221 Tuesday, Dec 1, 15 @ 3:03 pm

  44. Everyone gets 10 minutes, unless you count the Givernor’s last word.

    Comment by AC Tuesday, Dec 1, 15 @ 3:03 pm

  45. So, uh… what exactly is supposed to happen when the cameras turn off? Are they supposed to negotiate?

    When the camera zooms out from Rauner, 50/50 Madigan is gone. Haven’t seen a farce like this in a while.

    Comment by Man with a plan Tuesday, Dec 1, 15 @ 3:04 pm

  46. Rauner’s big 3, redistricting, term limits and property tax reform. None of which fix fiscal crisis. We’re screwed on getting a budget.

    Rauner was more moderate, Cullerton was his usual best, Radogno was a toenail, Madigan still confrontational and Durkin is stuck in la la land.

    Comment by Norseman Tuesday, Dec 1, 15 @ 3:04 pm

  47. Durkin’s message? Basically it’s all your fault democratic party!

    How can you expect to seem powerful and be a victim at the same time. He needs to go away.

    Comment by JS Mill Tuesday, Dec 1, 15 @ 3:05 pm

  48. Lots of talking past each other, which was my guess from jump street, but, it was what it was

    I owe President Cullerton props, his “speech” was the standout.

    Comment by Oswego Willy Tuesday, Dec 1, 15 @ 3:06 pm

  49. Well, it looks like we continue to go nowhere fast with the Governor’s continued push on the anti-union front.

    Comment by Demoralized Tuesday, Dec 1, 15 @ 3:06 pm

  50. Huh.

    Does anyone else think that it ended much like the Sopranos series finale?

    Comment by the Other Anonymous Tuesday, Dec 1, 15 @ 3:06 pm

  51. If Rauner’s big 3 are redistricting, term limits and property tax relief, then I think this Jim Steinman lyric is appropriate:

    “Two out of three ain’t bad.”

    Comment by RNUG Tuesday, Dec 1, 15 @ 3:08 pm

  52. Rauner can’t help himself with his union obsession. This is hilarious.

    Comment by Politix Tuesday, Dec 1, 15 @ 3:09 pm

  53. Groundhog Day. Yawn.

    Comment by illinoised Tuesday, Dec 1, 15 @ 3:09 pm

  54. Thank you and good night!

    So weird.

    Comment by Politix Tuesday, Dec 1, 15 @ 3:10 pm

  55. That reminded me of some of the “debates” my teachers would begin in high school civics and college political theory classes.

    Rauner will get the redistricting he wishes.

    Comment by Team Sleep Tuesday, Dec 1, 15 @ 3:11 pm

  56. How does this “may” collective bargaining work? Rauner wants local government to decide if they want to collective bargain over pay. So govt doesn’t because their leadership is incompetent and incapable of saying no, what’s to stop union from striking because they want to discuss pay?

    Comment by Norseman Tuesday, Dec 1, 15 @ 3:13 pm

  57. President Cullerton wins the public speech today.

    Comment by Mama Tuesday, Dec 1, 15 @ 3:14 pm

  58. So, Gov’nor….
    Contract negotiations? Local control.
    Don’t want that new charter school in your neighborhood?
    Talk to the hand.

    Comment by Sue Tuesday, Dec 1, 15 @ 3:17 pm

  59. Does property tax relief include collective bargainin’ and Prevailin’ Wage restrictions?

    Just askin’

    Comment by Oswego Willy Tuesday, Dec 1, 15 @ 3:17 pm

  60. I am not a Cullerton fan , but he was the most sensible so far.

    Comment by JS Mill Tuesday, Dec 1, 15 @ 3:18 pm

  61. == Does property tax relief include collective bargainin’ and Prevailin’ Wage restrictions? ==

    That’s what I thought I heard … hence my 3:08 comment.

    Comment by RNUG Tuesday, Dec 1, 15 @ 3:18 pm

  62. === Does property tax relief include collective bargainin’ and Prevailin’ Wage restrictions? ===

    Given his big “why not let locals decide on collective bargaining” finish, I would say yes.

    Comment by Norseman Tuesday, Dec 1, 15 @ 3:20 pm

  63. - RNUG - and - Norseman -

    You “get” me, I’d Crew with you guys anytime…

    Comment by Oswego Willy Tuesday, Dec 1, 15 @ 3:25 pm

  64. I think there will be movement on some of the non-GRF funding issues and everyone will claim progress, maybe so. Term limits and redistricting will be discussed but need to be defined on how it will be done and who will it apply to i.e state officials, federal, county etc. I mean if term limits are good for one group it should be good for all Elimination of collective bargaining is still a non starter. All gave good presentations with the exception of Durkin, must have drank too much coffee as he appeared agitated the whole time.

    Comment by ToughGuy Tuesday, Dec 1, 15 @ 3:26 pm

  65. ==- Norseman - Tuesday, Dec 1, 15 @ 3:20 pm: Given his big “why not let locals decide on collective bargaining” finish, I would say yes.==

    Norseman,I agree with you. Why can’t the governor be honest for a change at state the truth? The truth is he wants collective bargaining gone!

    Comment by Mama Tuesday, Dec 1, 15 @ 3:26 pm

  66. Any chance of the transcript being posted somewhere?

    Comment by howie Tuesday, Dec 1, 15 @ 3:27 pm

  67. Not gonna hang around for the end result of the closed door meeting. Captain Ahab ain’t giving up the great white whale and that’s all there is to it. The state be darned..

    Comment by Mouthy Tuesday, Dec 1, 15 @ 3:29 pm

  68. Rauner only needs 3* things.

    *For sufficiently large values of 3

    Comment by AC Tuesday, Dec 1, 15 @ 3:30 pm

  69. ==chance of the transcript being posted somewhere?
    ==

    All you have to do is pull up a speech any of them have given the last year. None of them went off script

    Comment by Anonymous Tuesday, Dec 1, 15 @ 3:31 pm

  70. So my three year old thinks that if she asks me for a cookie before dinner, by the 50th time she asks I’ll magically say Yes (which doesn’t happen). It appears the Gov has the same mentality.

    Comment by Huh? Tuesday, Dec 1, 15 @ 3:31 pm

  71. ===Cullerton is the most authentic person in the room===

    My how the threshold for leadership has been diminished in this state===

    Comment by DuPage Don Tuesday, Dec 1, 15 @ 3:34 pm

  72. Predictable, yes. But I don’t remember the bonus round conclusion by Rauner being part of the format the leaders agreed to. Not helpful.

    Comment by Columbo Tuesday, Dec 1, 15 @ 3:35 pm

  73. To JS Mill - yes President Cullerton loves play the man of reason. He wants to meet and meet, to what purpose?

    What was very clear from these statements was that the Governor and his legislative leaders totally believe local governments need to be able to void all or parts of collective bargaining agreements in order to contain costs. Moreover, Gov Rauner totally argued that the labor provisions were essential to having any property tax reform in Illinois.

    If these statement represent the Republican bargaining stance then we are going no where folks.

    Comment by Rod Tuesday, Dec 1, 15 @ 3:37 pm

  74. =- Columbo - Tuesday, Dec 1, 15 @ 3:35 pm:

    Predictable, yes. But I don’t remember the bonus round conclusion by Rauner being part of the format the leaders agreed to. Not helpful.=

    When you hijack a meeting you don’t hijack 90% of it..

    Comment by Mouthy Tuesday, Dec 1, 15 @ 3:38 pm

  75. === Any chance of the transcript being posted somewhere? ===

    Check next year’s campaign literature. (/s)

    Comment by Norseman Tuesday, Dec 1, 15 @ 3:48 pm

  76. Save that tape

    Comment by internal angel Tuesday, Dec 1, 15 @ 3:54 pm

  77. Apparently Radogno and Durkin didn’t get the turnaround memo that Bruce was dropping *or de-emphasizing* WC.

    Didn’t he first come in saying he needed 11 votes? Man, amateur hour up there.

    Comment by Abe the Babe Tuesday, Dec 1, 15 @ 4:00 pm

  78. ===Didn’t he first come in saying he needed 11 votes?===

    January.

    That’s the signal.

    Comment by Oswego Willy Tuesday, Dec 1, 15 @ 4:06 pm

  79. So 10 Turnaround items in the campaign were consolidated into 8 earlier this year, without any being given up.

    Then 8 were rhetorically consolidated into 4, without actually giving any up, by combining two or more into the same ones.

    Now he claims only wants 3? Which certainly practically include at least five of the former 8?

    Would try to track what Rauner is saying versus his current actual agenda, but why bother? He doesn’t do simple numbers well in any context.

    Why doesn’t he just announce clearly what he has given up, and then not stick them into other bills?

    Comment by walker Tuesday, Dec 1, 15 @ 4:13 pm

  80. The dreadlock continues.

    Comment by walker Tuesday, Dec 1, 15 @ 4:17 pm

  81. - walker -

    I think the deal, the wildest dream deal is…

    End Prevailing Wage, water down Collective Bargaining, then surrender to whatever the Cullerton and Madigan want.

    The Union wants are always the one’s required

    Comment by Oswego Willy Tuesday, Dec 1, 15 @ 4:19 pm

  82. == @ILSenDems The budget is not just ours (Democrats), it is the governor’s and the Republicans as well: Cullerton. There will be more meetings. ==

    Cullerton ==gets it==.

    Rauner and Madigan need each other and must work with each other. Neither can independently pass a budget.

    Comment by Formerly Known As... Tuesday, Dec 1, 15 @ 4:20 pm

  83. I’ve spent more time in the finance office of a car dealership than they spent meeting on issues significantly more complicated and contentious than a simple car purchase. I appreciate the tone and example Cullerton is trying to set, but I’m not sure how the meeting could’ve been anything close to productive.

    Comment by AC Tuesday, Dec 1, 15 @ 4:26 pm

  84. Whatever the effect of this public speechifyin’, it was lost to the Chicago Videogate Meltdown. Sorry, Rauner, your scripted show bombed.

    Comment by Wensicia Tuesday, Dec 1, 15 @ 4:27 pm

  85. == @moniquegarcia GOP leaders, sans Rauner, came out to say not much got done. Now standoff between Madigan and Rauner on who will have last word today. ==

    ^LOL^

    Really? No, really? The Speaker thinks it is his right to speak last, after the Governor?

    Oh my. We really are in trouble if that is the sort of ==compromise== coming out of this meeting.

    Comment by Formerly Known As... Tuesday, Dec 1, 15 @ 4:31 pm

  86. I have been out today until just now. Was hoping to watch this monumental, long awaited and long overdue meeting. Does not appear that I missed much after reading these comments. Seems that BVR is still in campaign mode and that this was little more than a photo opportunity and a chance to get some sound bites.

    Once again Willy is right - the operative word is “January”. Should be interesting to see the dynamics of what will happen then!

    Comment by illini Tuesday, Dec 1, 15 @ 4:39 pm

  87. Looks like someone learned the letter “G” today! Who’s a big boy now?

    Comment by Anonymous Tuesday, Dec 1, 15 @ 4:42 pm

  88. I once thought October was a pessimistic prediction of when we would have a budget, now I think January is too optimistic, especially after today’s “Monologue of the Leaders”.

    Comment by AC Tuesday, Dec 1, 15 @ 4:44 pm

  89. It would have been swell if the governor had explained why his agenda is worth the fiscal and economic destruction caused by his hostage strategy.

    Comment by Wordslinger Tuesday, Dec 1, 15 @ 4:45 pm

  90. Still waiting? This is priceless.

    Just like a pre-K.

    Comment by Formerly Known As... Tuesday, Dec 1, 15 @ 4:53 pm

  91. From the Twitters, Radogno may have had a “McCarthy lite” moment when she said Democrats are protecting “special interests” who fund them.

    By “McCarthy lite” I mean US Rep McCarthy who said/implied that Benghazi hearings would take down Clinton’s poll numbers.

    A purpose of weakening unions we know is to weaken their ability to fund politicians. That would leave the path clear for the handful of “white knight” multimillionaires and billionaires to not be seriously challenged as they pour millions into their crusade to “save” the taxpayers.

    Labor has to stay vigilant and active and know what is the endgame. That includes contacting GA members and urging them to reject anti-union proposals.

    Comment by Grandson of Man Tuesday, Dec 1, 15 @ 4:56 pm

  92. Yep, OW, I think January is when Madigan throws Labor under the bus.

    Comment by Honeybear Tuesday, Dec 1, 15 @ 4:58 pm

  93. - Honeybear -,

    I’d be working Madigan and Cullerton, but elections have consequences too…

    Feel for you, not much sympathy for AFSCME.

    Cut the best deal. That’s the best option.

    Comment by Oswego Willy Tuesday, Dec 1, 15 @ 5:05 pm

  94. Wordslinger i agree with you. He will just do his angry white dude routine until they handcuff him. His money isolates him from real people, the real world and real government. I never want to get that lost in the wilderness.

    Comment by internal angel Tuesday, Dec 1, 15 @ 5:32 pm

  95. Did anyone question Madigan in the presser about the “brick” on Moylan’s bill to free up funds?

    Comment by Info Tuesday, Dec 1, 15 @ 5:34 pm

  96. And again as before, Republicans will have the last word.
    Now, Rauner spokespersons Jim Durkin and Christine Radogno have concluded their remarks…

    Comment by Austin Blvd Tuesday, Dec 1, 15 @ 5:36 pm

  97. Rahm was right to let McCarthy go. I realize Mr. McCarthy didnt pull the trigger on those kids, but the coverup occurred on his watch. Ethics comes down from the top in any organization. Painful as it was for Rahm, he made the right decision. McCarthy needs to suck it up.

    Comment by internal angel Tuesday, Dec 1, 15 @ 5:44 pm

  98. === I think January is when Madigan throws Labor under the bus. ===

    Honeybear, I don’t think so. What’s in it for him to do that? He losses a traditional Dem ally for what benefit. The right to raise taxes. That’s cutting your nose off to spite your face. Most importantly, throwing labor under the bus gives Rauner a win and that is against every fiber of Madigan’s, especially after being the gov’s personal punching bag over the campaign and this year.

    Comment by Norseman Tuesday, Dec 1, 15 @ 5:44 pm

  99. Info,

    I believe it was Amanda Vinicky who asked Madigan about the bill. She asked four questions in an effort to pin down some details. Madigan confirmed that negotiations are “ongoing” and that the bill would not yet be allowed to advance to the Senate. She even asked “How and what are you negotiating on a bill that’s already passed?” but all he said was “Appropriations”.

    Comment by Anonymous Tuesday, Dec 1, 15 @ 5:47 pm

  100. - Honeybear -

    Please see - Norseman -

    Thanks, OW.

    - Norseman -, well said.

    Comment by Oswego Willy Tuesday, Dec 1, 15 @ 6:37 pm

  101. I agree with Norseman and believe also that many Democratic legislators will not vote for anti-union proposals.

    I listened to a bit of Madigan’s presser, and he reiterated that workers comp reform and a property tax freeze are doable for his party. He said workers comp legislation that exists can be amended.

    Comment by Grandson of Man Tuesday, Dec 1, 15 @ 6:54 pm

  102. ===Madigan throws Labor under the bus.===

    (Not directed to Honeybear in particular)

    Which bogeyman caricature of the Speaker are we speaking of?

    The stubborn scheming boss who will crash the entire state to continue feathering his own nest? –if so, what is the motivation?

    Or.

    The well-intentioned democratic protector of the middle class & working class wages-earners of the state? –and if so, what is the rationale?

    Comment by Kasparov Tuesday, Dec 1, 15 @ 7:05 pm

  103. Kasparov - several words caught my attention - bogeyman, motivation and rationale.

    Your point!

    Comment by illini Tuesday, Dec 1, 15 @ 8:21 pm

  104. Madigan and Cullertons introductory “10 minutes” were only a few minutes each and were very poorly scripted. Sounded uncertain and unprepared.

    Comment by justacitizen Tuesday, Dec 1, 15 @ 8:53 pm

  105. I listened to the pod cast - I want the time of my life spent listening back. Absolutely nothing was accomplished. Both sides spoke to their perceived constituencies. Some blathered more than others. Regardless, sound bytes will be extracted and fed to the public as reasoned debate and will be accepted according to mercurial beliefs. The busy and the uninterested will hear and believe the sound bytes with nary a thought passing through their minds. Hence the root of the problem.

    Comment by Illinoian Tuesday, Dec 1, 15 @ 9:29 pm

  106. Just a citizen … As compared to the lick boot scripted comments of Durkin and Raydogno contradictory scripted statements?

    Comment by Illinoian Tuesday, Dec 1, 15 @ 9:33 pm

  107. Just a citizen … As compared to the lick boot scripted comments of Durkin and Radogno contradictory scripted statements?

    Comment by Illinoian Tuesday, Dec 1, 15 @ 9:35 pm

  108. I love the whole “Rauner has backed off of (topic of your choice) so he’s compromising.”

    Having a tantrum because you want a unicorn, then saying “Ok, I don’t need the unicorn, just give me a magical pony” is not compromise…

    Comment by HangingOn Tuesday, Dec 1, 15 @ 10:19 pm

  109. Norseman and OW, thanks for the wise counsel. I just get so concerned that we (Labor) will be used as a pawn. We can be as strong as we want but in the end elections do have consequences and the legislature can destroy us faster than we can come back at them. Plus if they betray us what can we do about it? Support the GOP? No, I think Madigan has us by the apples and I’m scared to death of what could come next.

    Comment by Honeybear Wednesday, Dec 2, 15 @ 7:13 am

  110. Honeybear, it’s my belief that you have Rauner to thank for keeping Madigan from agreeing to further erode AFSCME rights. Rauner’s arrogance and win at all cost strategy - money’s not a limit - forced Madigan as a response to Rauner’s ham-handedness away from his own concerns about public sector unions. A Thompson or Ryan could have easily gotten some more limits on AFSCME rights from Madigan IMHO.

    Comment by Norseman Wednesday, Dec 2, 15 @ 9:21 am

Add a comment

Sorry, comments are closed at this time.

Previous Post: Chicago GOP cries foul over Democratic interference
Next Post: Another one?


Last 10 posts:

more Posts (Archives)

WordPress Mobile Edition available at alexking.org.

powered by WordPress.