Capitol Fax.com - Your Illinois News Radar


Latest Post | Last 10 Posts | Archives


Previous Post: Madigan says his longevity helps him “resist” Rauner’s “extremism”
Next Post: Madigan: Golden Declicious or Honeycrisp

McAuliffe already up on Chicago broadcast TV

Posted in:

* A state legislator running super-expensive Chicago broadcast TV ads in early August? Completely unheard of until Rep. Michael McAuliffe (R-Chicago) started airing a new spot yesterday. If it happens at all (and it’s pretty rare), Chicago broadcast ads usually don’t start until October.

This was videoed by a friend during last night’s Cubs game, so I apologize for the quality

Rep. McAuliffe is facing Democrat Merry Marwig in what had been expected to be a barnburner. This early ad may change the odds.

posted by Rich Miller
Tuesday, Aug 2, 16 @ 9:22 am

Comments

  1. I’ve already received 3 mailings from him. His Northwest side of Chicago area is heavily populated with police, firefighters and teachers. Lockstep with Lord Bruce is definitely going to hurt him.

    Comment by Chungas revenge Tuesday, Aug 2, 16 @ 9:41 am

  2. Solid ad.
    As was stated before, once you’re on TV you better stay up.
    That’s going to be some big dough in Chicago network.

    Comment by DuPage Bard Tuesday, Aug 2, 16 @ 9:42 am

  3. Exactly the kind of ad he needs, because the Dems are going to tie him to Rauner and Trump all day long.

    Comment by Century Club Tuesday, Aug 2, 16 @ 9:48 am

  4. I saw this 3 times between last night and this morning during the today show, so it’s a heavy buy.
    I was waiting for Mrs. to say “Michael doesn’t have a social agenda”, but she never did.

    Comment by northsider (the original) Tuesday, Aug 2, 16 @ 9:57 am

  5. Thought he was NOT in lockstep with Rauner. one big vote recently voted with Chicago residents interests, from my recollection.

    Comment by Amalia Tuesday, Aug 2, 16 @ 9:58 am

  6. == police, firefighters and teachers. ===

    Maybe teachers. But Police and Fire have a considerable bone to pick with the Democratic party right now. It’s not a little problem.

    Comment by A guy Tuesday, Aug 2, 16 @ 10:03 am

  7. Saw the spot today - it is a decent enough spot and I agree being up this early may kill the race for Dems. I am not a genius, but it seems like Madigan wants to pick off this seat, but at the end of the day its not the top of the list.

    Comment by Downstate GOP Faithless Tuesday, Aug 2, 16 @ 10:22 am

  8. TV station executive: This is going to be a very good year for us!!$$$!!

    Comment by DuPage Tuesday, Aug 2, 16 @ 10:26 am

  9. “Truly Independent Voice for Us” will probably unearth Madigan votes that have not been in the interests of the district and connect to Dem candidate running as more of that.

    Comment by Amalia Tuesday, Aug 2, 16 @ 11:13 am

  10. Keep in mind, many were saying that Brent Hassert, Terry Parke and Skip Saviano were unbeatable but we know what happened. If Madigan and his foot soldiers target you, watch out. McAuliffe has been given a free pass and it’s going to take more than his wife’s commercial to save him. Hard to say you stand up to party bosses when you vote hand in hand with the Gov.

    Comment by Shield Tuesday, Aug 2, 16 @ 11:14 am

  11. Scott Kennedy has McAuliffe at almost $250K COH, so he’s got some money to spend (Rauner money of course since a huge portion of that 250K is 133K from HRO). Still, the effect of individual TV ads does not last very long. He’s got to follow this up with something sustainable and meaningful. How much does the fact that this is Rauner money taint him?

    http://illinoiselectiondata.com/profiles/2016/general/generalassembly.php

    Comment by Precinct Captain Tuesday, Aug 2, 16 @ 11:19 am

  12. the community. who represents it best. in multiple ways. that is always a question in any race.

    Comment by Amalia Tuesday, Aug 2, 16 @ 11:44 am

  13. McAuliffe voted against the Governor and for labor on a prevailing wage bill this Spring. So now labor is going to punish McAuliffe by falling into line with Madigan’s attempt to oust him? Probably not a good lesson for other Republicans who might be tempted to buck the Governor and support labor in the future.

    Comment by phocion Tuesday, Aug 2, 16 @ 11:50 am

  14. Isn’t his wife a big Springfield lobbyist?

    Comment by Anonymouth Tuesday, Aug 2, 16 @ 11:55 am

  15. **Scott Kennedy has McAuliffe at almost $250K COH, so he’s got some money to spend **

    LOL - you know quickly $250k goes if you’re on broadcast TV in Chicago?

    The money doesn’t really matter though… Rauner/HRO essentially have unlimited funds, so they’ll be able to spend whatever they want/need. But lets not pretend that the $250k is meaningful.

    Comment by JoeMaddon Tuesday, Aug 2, 16 @ 12:03 pm

  16. Google finds his wife worked for Dems and has a firm.

    Comment by Amalia Tuesday, Aug 2, 16 @ 12:05 pm

  17. I can’t tell from the video above, does it say who it’s paid for by?

    Comment by The Captain Tuesday, Aug 2, 16 @ 12:25 pm

  18. **does it say who it’s paid for by?**

    Yea - it was paid for by Citizens for Michael P McAuliffe
    and House Republican Organization.

    Comment by JoeMaddon Tuesday, Aug 2, 16 @ 12:27 pm

  19. @ JoeMaddon

    Thank you.

    Comment by The Captain Tuesday, Aug 2, 16 @ 12:33 pm

  20. Was Mike McAuliffe standing up to party leaders when they helped his mother in law (Bette Morreale) get clouted into a job at Dept of Revenue?

    Comment by anon Tuesday, Aug 2, 16 @ 2:27 pm

  21. It’s my perception that McAuliffe cast more independent votes under Cross than he has under Rauner. I remember, for instance, when he and Skip voted for a state contribution to the CPS pension fund.

    Comment by anon2 Tuesday, Aug 2, 16 @ 2:41 pm

  22. I wouldn’t want to wager against McAuliffe given his family’s history of pulling out contested races. Everyone emphasizes the customary “nonaggression pacts” and “truces” between area Democrats and Republicans which have held during most, but not all, election years. Both McAuliffe and his late father beat back occasional Democratic challenges. Roger McAuliffe was the last Chicago Republican standing after the Cutback Amendment took effect. Michael McAuliffe bested another Democratic legislator who moved into the area after redistricting.

    Comment by Anonymous Tuesday, Aug 2, 16 @ 2:45 pm

  23. well, at least anonymous/uninteresting identifiers are applying to both sides of the aisle posting on this thread!

    Comment by Amalia Tuesday, Aug 2, 16 @ 3:12 pm

  24. **It’s my perception that McAuliffe cast more independent votes under Cross than he has under Rauner.**

    Not just your perception…

    Comment by JoeMaddon Tuesday, Aug 2, 16 @ 5:46 pm

Add a comment

Sorry, comments are closed at this time.

Previous Post: Madigan says his longevity helps him “resist” Rauner’s “extremism”
Next Post: Madigan: Golden Declicious or Honeycrisp


Last 10 posts:

more Posts (Archives)

WordPress Mobile Edition available at alexking.org.

powered by WordPress.