Latest Post | Last 10 Posts | Archives
Previous Post: Tattoo artists, rejoice!
Next Post: Feeling yucky
Posted in:
Another “old” story, but generally missed by the mainstream media. Illinois Issues looks into a controversial state contract with a private company.
The Blagojevich Administration has doled out at least $68 million in consulting contracts, eyeing cost savings of up to $1 billion.But a look at one of the administration’s most lucrative arrangements, a $24.9 million contract with a politically connected Chicago firm designed to help CMS streamline its property management practices, suggests savings projections were overblown. […]
CMS says its contract with Illinois Property Asset Management LLC, a Chicago consortium, saved taxpayers $6.5 million. But the contract was supposed to save at least $14 million last year. […]
In an interview last spring, CMS Director Michael Rumman estimated that the contract with Illinois Property Asset Management could eventually save the state $100 million a year. The budget proposal Blagojevich unveiled a few months earlier estimated savings of $120 million by 2006. Today, that estimate has been cut in half. CMS spokeswoman Nicole Grady now puts the total savings at $57 million over a three-year period. […]
And at least two real estate deals signed since Illinois Property Asset Management came on board raised questions about the effectiveness of the high-priced advice CMS is getting. The first is a two-year no-bid lease for storage space near the Kennedy Expressway in Chicago. The Illinois Lottery inked the $48,000 deal with Mark IV Realty, which also rents billboard space to the agency and donated $90,000 worth of billboard space to Blagojevich during his campaign for governor.
The second deal involves the Illinois Department of Natural Resources. At the suggestion of Illinois Property Asset Management, DNR employees moved out of the Thompson Center last summer and into $61,000-a-year office space in the Chicago Loop. The five-year no-bid lease was signed a few months before the agency laid off 124 employees. […]
Documents released by CMS do not indicate that Illinois Property Asset Management has suggested reforms that would have made those no-bid deals any less likely. In general, the advice the state is getting remains a mystery outside the administration. […]
With CMS taking its cues from the private sector, the business of state government is increasingly becoming a private matter for this administration. Critics argue this sells short the 12 million Illinoisans who are the de facto shareholders in the business of state government. While the private sector might produce a better work product, so far Illinois taxpayers aren’t seeing much more than the price tag.
posted by Rich Miller
Saturday, Feb 26, 05 @ 1:32 pm
Sorry, comments are closed at this time.
Previous Post: Tattoo artists, rejoice!
Next Post: Feeling yucky
WordPress Mobile Edition available at alexking.org.
powered by WordPress.
It would be nice if someone like the Auditor General or the Attorney General would look into what the CMS/iPAM collaboration has actually delivered. This and the contract with Mackenzie and Company are basically the equivalent of a “Consultant Full Employment Act.” Neither contract has delivered savings, and frankly haven’t hit any performance or schedule benchmarks. Honest management would dictate dumping the contract and starting over.
Comment by Anonymous Saturday, Feb 26, 05 @ 1:55 pm
Have faith Mr./Ms. ANON, a CMS audit is just around the corner….non-believing rumor mongers who have not embraced reform and renewal are predicting it will not tell a good picture of Gov. Blagoof. and his consultant cronies. Of course, those are people mired in the old culture and not the new enlightened age of “Laws, smaws don’t get bogged down in the details”
Comment by Anonymous Sunday, Feb 27, 05 @ 12:51 pm
B***S***.
State govt was so inefficient that consultants had a hard time prioritizing where to start w/ cost savings. Almost like shooting fish in a barrel, biggest challenge was arguing w/ bureaucrats that they weren’t “special” and didn’t deserve some unique purchasing rule. And, the $$ was taken out of agency budgets to begin with, so the net impact on state has been good.
Comment by Anonymous Monday, Feb 28, 05 @ 10:45 pm