Capitol Fax.com - Your Illinois News Radar


Latest Post | Last 10 Posts | Archives


Previous Post: This just in… SGOPs: If SDems kept promise, we have votes for the capital bill
Next Post: SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today’s edition of Capitol Fax (Use all caps in password)

This just in… Part 2

Posted in:

* 3:40 pm - I’m told that Chicago will testify in favor of the gaming bill with some reservations.

There’s also word that Senate President Jones may not call the transit bill for a vote. Craziness has resulted with some SDems threatening to drop off the gaming bill.

* 4:10 pm - The transit bill wasn’t called in committee. Mayor Daley stood firm against the changes to the RTA governing board made by Sen Prez Jones.. Sen. Cullerton claimed it was a drafting error. Not. Daley threatened to kill the bill. Nobody knows if the bill will come up again tonight. Sen Jones was the one who insisted on changes opposed to by Daley for whatever reason. Cullerton has sided with Daley all along.

…Adding… Jones inserted the language at the behest of some suburban members. Jones’ version is more advantageous to the ‘burbs while the House version favored Chicago.

* 5:40 pm - The Senate is taking up the gaming bill now. The smoking exemption for the casinos will apparently be dropped but that could imperil the bill’s chances

… Adding… the smoking exemption was specifically dropped because of the roll call realities. But there are a lot of members whovare flipping all over the place at the moment.

* 6:53 pm - The gaming bill just passed with 37 votes.

posted by Rich Miller
Tuesday, Sep 18, 07 @ 3:45 pm

Comments

  1. Obviously, Jones and Blago are drinking the same koolaid. What are they thinking taking on Madigan and now Daley???!!!

    Comment by anon Tuesday, Sep 18, 07 @ 4:23 pm

  2. When did the Mayor become the states leading public official?

    Comment by The 'Broken Heart' of Rogers Park Tuesday, Sep 18, 07 @ 4:27 pm

  3. Looks to me like “Da Maer” has publically and overtly taken over the governorship. Rod has been a “Puppet” anyway, now ‘Da Maer” has thrown down the strings and taken a “do it me ownself” attitude!!!!! Which button does he push when the Legislature votes?? Or should I ask how many??

    *(&^%%$^#@&( state anyway!!!!!

    Comment by ABolt243 Tuesday, Sep 18, 07 @ 4:37 pm

  4. Hmmm….no CTA bill
    That sets the scene for no capital bill when the casino smokers drop off.
    When does the adjournment pool start?
    I say about 6:45 whe tne local news if over

    Comment by Casey Jones Tuesday, Sep 18, 07 @ 4:42 pm

  5. AP headline:
    Blagojevich: No other felons in high-ranking posts

    Well, that is reassuring. How long will that statement be valid?

    Comment by butt head Tuesday, Sep 18, 07 @ 4:50 pm

  6. The Keystone Cops routine is becoming old.

    Comment by Commonsense in Illinois Tuesday, Sep 18, 07 @ 4:59 pm

  7. Happy News For the Tribune. They scammed the govt out of $1 billion in ‘88, got caught and apparently beat the rap.

    Ain’t Bush’s Justice Dept Grand!

    Tribune to get big tax refund in settlement
    (Crain’s) — Tribune Co. is to get a big refund from the Internal Revenue Service, money that will help chip away at debt when the company goes private in an $8.2-billion deal later this year.

    In a court filing made public Tuesday, lawyers for Tribune and the IRS reported that the congressional Joint Committee on Taxation “had no adverse criticism” of a settlement between the two parties. The U.S. Department of Justice has requested a refund check be sent to Tribune.

    In a securities filing last month, Tribune said net cash proceeds from the refund will total about $290 million after income tax on interest and on state income tax refunds.

    The U.S. Tax Court had socked Tribune with a $1-billion tax bill in 2005 over proceeds from a 1998 sale of two companies owned by Times Mirror Co., which Tribune acquired in 2000. Tribune appealed the ruling in Chicago’s 7th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals and announced the proposed settlement June 1.

    Comment by Casey Jones Tuesday, Sep 18, 07 @ 5:03 pm

  8. Who wants to bet no casino bill passes tonight?

    Comment by Gregor Tuesday, Sep 18, 07 @ 6:28 pm

  9. It sounds like one of those door-slamming french farces– characters criss-crossing the stage, story lines being braided, everybody misinformed about everybody else. But will there be a happy ending?

    Comment by Muskrat Tuesday, Sep 18, 07 @ 6:35 pm

  10. watsons folding like a cheap chair

    Comment by Anon Tuesday, Sep 18, 07 @ 6:39 pm

  11. This system is insane and in need of a major structural overhaul. The only problem with a Constitutional Convention is that no one is quite sure exactly HOW the delegates would be selected.

    Comment by Squideshi Tuesday, Sep 18, 07 @ 6:44 pm

  12. “#

    - Gregor - Tuesday, Sep 18, 07 @ 6:28 pm:

    Who wants to bet no casino bill passes tonight?”

    Ummm - Can I take that bet now?

    Comment by s Tuesday, Sep 18, 07 @ 6:54 pm

  13. Squideshi, I’m not sure what the confusion would be about the selection of delegates. The legislature must authorize an election of two delegates per Senate district. There are many who might be concerned about which groups would have infuence over the delegates, but the HOW would seem to be fixed by the Constitution.

    Comment by muon Tuesday, Sep 18, 07 @ 7:01 pm

  14. bond authorization passed with 53. looking good for capital

    Comment by Anon Tuesday, Sep 18, 07 @ 7:14 pm

  15. cap bill passed with 58 votes

    Comment by Anon Tuesday, Sep 18, 07 @ 7:17 pm

  16. What does the House do now?

    Comment by Lefty Tuesday, Sep 18, 07 @ 7:24 pm

  17. The House doesn’t pass that casino bill, that is for sure.

    Comment by LIL BLAGO Tuesday, Sep 18, 07 @ 7:30 pm

  18. Muon @ 7:01 pm–

    this is from the constitution, but my question is, where do the two delegates in the districts come from (selected), and who votes for them after they are selected? I’m missing something as it as the HOW is not clear to me. Can you enlighten me?

    (d) The General Assembly, at the session following
    approval by the electors, by law shall provide for the
    Convention and for the election of two delegates from each
    Legislative District; designate the time and place of the
    Convention’s first meeting which shall be within three months
    after the election of delegates; fix and provide for the pay
    of delegates and officers; and provide for expenses
    necessarily incurred by the Convention.
    (e) To be eligible to be a delegate a person must meet
    the same eligibility requirements as a member of the General
    Assembly. Vacancies shall be filled as provided by law.

    Comment by Princeville Tuesday, Sep 18, 07 @ 7:37 pm

  19. I have serious doubts about the gaming bill even getting to the floor of the House, but that’s just me.

    Comment by Yellow Dog Democrat Tuesday, Sep 18, 07 @ 7:40 pm

  20. Let’s see - The House doesn’t come back until October, right? Special Session? Looks to me like things really slow down for a while. Gives em time for rational reflection.

    Comment by A Citizen Tuesday, Sep 18, 07 @ 7:53 pm

  21. Princeville, as I understand it, if the con-con is approved by the voters in 2008 the GA must pass a law in 2009 calling for the election of two delegates from each Senate district. Eligibility for delegate is clear in section (e).

    I only see the date of the election as a question open to the GA. The precedent from 1969 would be to set a special election in the fall of ‘09 using a non-partisan ballot.

    Comment by muon Tuesday, Sep 18, 07 @ 8:12 pm

  22. Advantage Blago/Emil. I cant say for sure if Madigan will call the bill, but there is going to be some serious, and I mean serious, pressure to do so from all side. With the City of Chicago on board with the casino plan and the unions all backing the capital plan, its not an enviable position. I think Madigan needs to compromise and get what he can out of this capital bill for his members.

    Comment by MR BROWN Tuesday, Sep 18, 07 @ 8:47 pm

  23. Madigan advances the casino bill IF Jones lets the Senate override Blago’s vetos. Or is this too simplistic?

    Comment by Little Egypt Tuesday, Sep 18, 07 @ 9:11 pm

  24. apparently they forgot the CTA must sell bonds to make their program work
    Guess this is more nonsense

    Comment by Casey Jones Tuesday, Sep 18, 07 @ 9:37 pm

  25. what is the SB #?

    Comment by capital bill # Tuesday, Sep 18, 07 @ 9:38 pm

  26. rich, do you have the roll call?

    Comment by anon Tuesday, Sep 18, 07 @ 9:46 pm

  27. The way the leadership and governor are behaving, they must really want voters to approve a constitutional convention next year. I know my index finger is already itching to tap a “YES” on the touch screen.

    Comment by eagerbeaver Tuesday, Sep 18, 07 @ 9:53 pm

  28. I agree with Little Egypt @ 9:14. If Emil lets the veto be overridden then the original deal is back on the table and Madigan can go with the capital & gaming bills. They might not end up looking like Emils bills. But Emil tossing Blago under the bus is very unlikely.

    Comment by anon Wednesday, Sep 19, 07 @ 12:21 am

  29. If the Senate passes a bill and it doesn’t pass the House, does it make a sound?

    Comment by Puzzle Wednesday, Sep 19, 07 @ 7:03 am

  30. Welcome to Illinoislavia, a field of blackbirds, a war of all against all.

    Comment by Punley Dieter Finn Wednesday, Sep 19, 07 @ 8:16 am

  31. interesting, all left over money goes to the City. I am not sure bypassing the General Assembly and the GRF is a good plan. If we thought Chicago had corruption issues now, just wait until this casino authority which is directly connected to the City of Chicago revenue gets up and running.

    Comment by Ghost Wednesday, Sep 19, 07 @ 8:27 am

Add a comment

Sorry, comments are closed at this time.

Previous Post: This just in… SGOPs: If SDems kept promise, we have votes for the capital bill
Next Post: SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today’s edition of Capitol Fax (Use all caps in password)


Last 10 posts:

more Posts (Archives)

WordPress Mobile Edition available at alexking.org.

powered by WordPress.