Latest Post | Last 10 Posts | Archives
Previous Post: More family stuff
Next Post: Pearson makes a funny
Posted in:
My newspaper column this week is about the state’s new gay rights law and the right wing’s false objection that it infringes on the rights of religious institutions.
This is a legitimate question because religious liberty is specifically spelled out in the U.S. Constitution. And it’s also legitimate because if the General Assembly just passed, and the governor signed, an unconstitutional bill on behalf of such a controversial minority, there could be hell to pay at the polls next year. Even though several Republicans voted for the bill, the GOP could use the issue to pound even the Democrats who didn’t vote for it, arguing their party is too radical to be trusted with the reins of government. This will happen anyway, but toss in an outrageous infringement on the freedom of churches and religious institutions, and … oy.Still, this church issue is much ado about nothing.
Meanwhile, the Southern Illinoisan’s Jim Muir writes about the controversy over a PBS episode of “Buster the Rabbit,” wherein Buster and his friends visit a Vermont family that’s headed by two moms (who are never, by the way, identified as lesbians).
What once was considered perverse and bizarre is now considered the norm. And what once was looked at as outlandish, unheard of and over-the-top is now considered to merely be routine.This has happened because we have failed to speak up and voice our opinion. The second step in this erosion takes place when every person who has a differing view is labeled as homophobic, judgmental, moralistic and bigoted and, of course let’s not forget the gay crowd’s pet word, intolerant. Not wanting to meet the wrath of this group, who might be the most intolerant crowd, most people simply shut up. And that’s allowed the erosion to take place, one small step, or bunny hop, at a time.
Well, label me all the above because I’m going to speak up and say the gay agenda-pushers are going way too far when they start putting lesbians and homosexuals in kid’s cartoons.
Google “Buster the Rabbit” and Muir’s column is the sixth most popular result, so it definitely got some play on the Internets. Understandably, Muir received several letters about his column, including one from a woman who described herself as a “soon-to-be mother in a same-sex household.” Muir responded to her complaints thusly:
This comment is simply another tired ploy by the gay community to liken its cause to the civil rights movement, which is insulting at best and absurd at worst. And let me also say her allegation that individuals have been denied equal rights concerning marriage is unequivocally wrong. […](I)t seems that proponents of gay marriage really don’t want equal rights — they already have equal rights just like the rest of us — they want special rights. This argument would be comparable to a 16-year-old screaming discrimination because he or she can’t vote or a 12-year-old claiming their equal rights have been denied because they can’t obtain a driver’s license.
posted by Rich Miller
Sunday, Feb 6, 05 @ 4:25 pm
Sorry, comments are closed at this time.
Previous Post: More family stuff
Next Post: Pearson makes a funny
WordPress Mobile Edition available at alexking.org.
powered by WordPress.
Muir is an asshat.
Comment by Not A Swan Monday, Feb 7, 05 @ 1:39 am
No, Muir is right.
Leave this (sexual orientation agenda) out of kids’ stuff. If, as is posited by the gay/lesbian community, the whole decision is determined genetically anyway, these kids will live out their true sexual orientation over time.
They shouldn’t be trying to recruit converts through socialization.
It’s not a lifestyle “choice” anyway, is it?
Comment by Anonymous Monday, Feb 7, 05 @ 7:50 am
Get it straight, Rich, it’s not “Buster the Rabbit”, it’s “Postcards from Buster”. Buster is the rabbit character from Marc Brown’s Authur series, which has long been almost as popular with that demographic as Clifford the Big Red Dog and Angelina Ballerina (who’s a mouse).
And to the other poster, if it’s genetic, then it shouldn’t matter whether gay parents are depicted or not, so Muir et al should calm down. If you think it’s not genetic, then speak up on that point.
Comment by Anonymous Monday, Feb 7, 05 @ 11:00 am
“(I)t seems that proponents of gay marriage really don’t want equal rights — they already have equal rights just like the rest of us — they want special rights. “
Huh? Generally, most people will say that they have the right to marry the person they love (who is an adult and is not related). So, how are gay people whose identity is defined by a sexual and affectional orientation towards people of the same sex, given the same right to marry?
Most people who are open-minded and don’t run screaming away from gays understand that saying “you have the right to marry someone of the opposite sex” to a gay person is ludicrous.
Comment by Anonymous Monday, Feb 7, 05 @ 11:34 am
“No, Muir is right.
Leave this (sexual orientation agenda) out of kids’ stuff. “
So we won’t be seeing any heterosexual couples on the cartoon anymore either? Because it’s a bit confusing to say that by their appearance there is an agenda of some sort other than the same agenda that exists in the entire series–teaching kids about other families. By the logic above then, there couldn’t be any parents because any couple appearing has an “agenda” and so would only showing one parent.
I am amused that two female bunny rabbits is now considered recruitment for lesbians.
Comment by ArchPundit Monday, Feb 7, 05 @ 1:17 pm