Capitol Fax.com - Your Illinois News Radar


Latest Post | Last 10 Posts | Archives


Previous Post: Open thread
Next Post: SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today’s edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)

Morning briefing

Posted in:

* Some interesting data…

I was going to wait and update this to see if any other rumored forthcoming retirements would happen but enough people have asked so here ya go. Tenure at the start of the 103rd GA, current 102nd, and start of the 102nd and 101st. https://t.co/2neOlLk27E pic.twitter.com/rLEaJ9W4jf

— John Amdor (@JohnAmdor) December 5, 2022


* Here’s the roundup…

posted by Isabel Miller
Tuesday, Dec 6, 22 @ 8:01 am

Comments

  1. The Jim Nowlan “5-2” court was seated yesterday.

    Boy, they showed everyone.

    This will be interesting going forward as to how the Jim Nowlan types view this Court, how they’d like to see/spin this new thing, brought on without any real political acumen to… redistricting within “winning” opportunities.

    There’s a lesson here…

    Comment by Oswego Willy Tuesday, Dec 6, 22 @ 8:19 am

  2. From the Center Square story: “All persons shall be bailable by sufficient sureties …,”

    Did it ever occur to republican legislators that the Illinois Constitution may have meant that every one accused of a crime should have the right to be released from jail prior to trial?

    “Bailable by sufficient sureties” would almost certainly include, “on their own recognizance,” since this practice has existed from the beginning. “Their word is their bond,” has been the practice for nearly all people of means.

    In this context, there is nothing about eliminating the routinization of cash as a surety that contradicts the Constitutional provision of “sufficient sureties.”

    Comment by H-W Tuesday, Dec 6, 22 @ 8:46 am

  3. With regard to the average years of service tables, it would be worth knowing what sort of retirement system exists for state legislators. Is it related to years of service, or does it work similar to the federal system in which a person receives a fixed retirement income regardless of years of service, upon leaving the legislature.

    Comment by H-W Tuesday, Dec 6, 22 @ 8:52 am

  4. I really love the scope of the Morning briefings. Everything from the statehouse, to the courts, to Sue (the dinosaur, not the commentor). Thank you, Isabel.

    Comment by cermak_rd Tuesday, Dec 6, 22 @ 8:57 am

  5. OW: And it will be 5-2 for a while with Rochford and O’Brien secure for at least 10 years.

    Be careful what you wish for Nowlan in getting Kilbride off the bench…

    Comment by Steve Rogers Tuesday, Dec 6, 22 @ 9:28 am

  6. Raising the age to 21 for hunting type firearms is the slippery slope gun owners have rallied around since the start of the debate.

    Comment by Blue Dog Tuesday, Dec 6, 22 @ 9:33 am

  7. =is the slippery slope=

    What? It sure is not a “slippery slope”. It is an attempt to tighten up gun ownership.

    Gun ownership at 21 is just fine.

    Comment by JS Mill Tuesday, Dec 6, 22 @ 9:47 am

  8. JSMill. I guess you oppose my idea of gun safety classes in high school then.

    Comment by Blue Dog Tuesday, Dec 6, 22 @ 9:52 am

  9. === I guess you oppose my idea of gun safety classes in high school then. ===

    I guess grooming is ok, if it comes from the far right.

    Comment by PublicServant Tuesday, Dec 6, 22 @ 10:37 am

  10. Hopefully the debate about the merits of the SAFE-T Act will help the public understand that money does nothing to protect the people. For instance, in that awful killing of a child allegedly by a FedEx driver in Texas, the defendant confessed and his bond was set at 1.5 million. Why on earth should someone be able to bond out on facts like that? Would it be safer for the public if the guy is out after posting that money? its just such a red herring. if you are a danger or if you might flee, you stay in. End of story.

    Comment by Paddyrollingstone Tuesday, Dec 6, 22 @ 10:47 am

  11. public servant. sounds like you oppose hunter%gun safety classes.

    Comment by Blue Dog Tuesday, Dec 6, 22 @ 12:47 pm

  12. “public servant. sounds like you oppose hunter%gun safety classes.”

    The user-interface of a keyboard may be more complicated than that of a gun, but I still wouldn’t trust a deadly firearm in the hands of someone who types like that.

    – MrJM

    Comment by MisterJayEm Tuesday, Dec 6, 22 @ 1:14 pm

  13. Blue Dog

    I would oppose those classes as part of some high school curriculum. That would be totally unnecessary. Those classes are available privately for anyone who wants to go. Why in the world you would think you need it in high school is beyond me. Unless you plan to utilize a firearm they are unnecessary.

    Comment by Demoralized Tuesday, Dec 6, 22 @ 2:23 pm

  14. demoralized. tha ks for a civil response. the reason I want education on gun safety is because nothing else seems to be working. teach the kids what the ramifications are if guns are used improperly. just like Drugs. it can’t hurt.

    Comment by Blue Dog Tuesday, Dec 6, 22 @ 2:35 pm

  15. “just like Drugs. it can’t hurt.”

    No high school in Illinois has a program that purports to teach its students how to drink booze or take drugs safely.

    They all advise students to abstain from drinking or doing recreational drugs until they are 21-year old adults.

    – MrJM

    Comment by MisterJayEm Tuesday, Dec 6, 22 @ 5:03 pm

Add a comment

Sorry, comments are closed at this time.

Previous Post: Open thread
Next Post: SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today’s edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)


Last 10 posts:

more Posts (Archives)

WordPress Mobile Edition available at alexking.org.

powered by WordPress.