Capitol Fax.com - Your Illinois News Radar » Is Quinn’s AV constitutional?
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      Mobile Version     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact
CapitolFax.com
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
Is Quinn’s AV constitutional?

Wednesday, Aug 1, 2012

* Gov. Pat Quinn was asked by reporters at least twice during a press conference yesterday about whether he actually has the power to use an amendatory veto to drastically change a piece of legislation, as Quinn did yesterday with his assault weapons ban AV. Here’s the first reporter question…

Do you concede there are any limits on your AV power?

He didn’t.

* Second question…

Where is there in the Constitution that says the governor can add such substantive language on a different topic to a bill?

Quinn pointed to unnamed Illinois Supreme Court opinions and voter action.

Press conference raw audio…

* OK, let’s go to the Illinois Constitution

The Governor may return a bill together with specific recommendations for change to the house in which it originated.

And that’s it.

* The Illinois Supreme Court has ruled that the governor’s AV powers go beyond just correcting errors or making minor changes. From People ex rel Klingert v. Howlett

Our examination of the records of the [Illinois Constitutional] Convention shows that the following terms were used to describe the kinds of “specific recommendations for change” that were contemplated: “corrections;” “precise corrections;” “technical flaws;” “simple deletions;” “to clean up the language.” In response to the following question put by Delegate Netsch, however, “Then was it the Committee’s thought that the conditional veto would be available only to correct technical errors?” a committee member answered, “No, Ma’am.”

* However, in the same case the Supremes also ruled on another matter...

The Illinois Supreme Court was confronted with Gov. Richard B. Ogilvie’s amendatory veto which amended the title of the bill and substituted a reworded proposal for all of the text after the enacting clause, although reiterating verbatum much of the language of the bill as originally passed. The court was obviously troubled that the scope of the governor’s authority in the new Constitution was not clearly stated nor could it be found in the committee reports or debates.

The justices did not attempt to delineate the exact kinds of changes that would fall within the power of the governor, but merely stated that “[It can be said with certainty, however, that the] substitution of complete new bills, as attempted in the present case, is not authorized [by the Constitution].” [Emphasis added, and added text from the original opinion can be found here]

* Gov. Quinn’s amendatory veto language begins with this

* So, Gov. Quinn’s amendatory veto appears to go way beyond even what Gov. Ogilvie tried. The Court has been clear that while governors are part of the legislative process, they cannot erase an entire bill and substitute their own language. Ogilvie used much of the same text from the original bill in his new proposal and the Court still shot it down. Quinn didn’t even bother with that nicety. He just wiped out the underlying bill entirely and wrote his own, new bill.

It’s a moot point, of course. As I told you yesterday, there’s no way this AV is going anywhere. But this sure looks like a major constitutional overreach by Gov. Quinn.

* Related…

* Illinois governor wants ban on assault-style weapons, high-capacity magazines: Illinois Governor Pat Quinn Tuesday ventured into territory where most elected officials and politicians fear to tread: An outright ban on assault style weapons and high capacity magazines for all guns.

* Illinois governor wants ban on assault weapons

* Quinn faces uphill fight for assault weapons ban - Colorado theater massacre demands action, governor says

* Assault weapons idea a publicity stunt, area lawmakers say

* Topinka: Assault weapons ban would be ‘hard to enforce’

* Local lawmakers oppose gun ban

* Gun owners balk at assault weapons ban proposal

* Illinois gov. proposes state assault weapons ban

- Posted by Rich Miller        

37 Comments
  1. - western illinois - Wednesday, Aug 1, 12 @ 9:42 am:

    Why doesnt he just AV pension reform?It would be just as Constituational.


  2. - Michelle Flaherty - Wednesday, Aug 1, 12 @ 9:45 am:

    But I thought the governor had swore his devotion to the constitution. Didn’t he just say that in his special session orders?


  3. - Sunshine - Wednesday, Aug 1, 12 @ 9:48 am:

    Perhaps the longer he is in this position of power, the larger his head becomes, and the smaller his brain?


  4. - Esteban - Wednesday, Aug 1, 12 @ 9:51 am:

    How does one determine what is-or isn’t- an “assault weapon” and who will make that determination?


  5. - Kerfuffle - Wednesday, Aug 1, 12 @ 9:54 am:

    It is all about appearances. You can’t let a good crisis go to waste even if PQ’s solution to that crisis doesn’t pass constitutional muster.


  6. - Shore - Wednesday, Aug 1, 12 @ 9:54 am:

    If you’re aiming at suburban independents who aren’t pro gun with a stunt like this, you need to be able to convert because otherwise you come off looking like an incompetent goof and it backfires because one of the things suburban independents really value is competence and leaders who can get stuff done in a serious way that delivers solid results.


  7. - Anonymous - Wednesday, Aug 1, 12 @ 9:57 am:

    I refuse to believe that Gov. Quinn would do something with no chance of success because he wanted to have a one-shot publicity stunt.


  8. - Cincinnatus - Wednesday, Aug 1, 12 @ 10:02 am:

    Quinn is doing nothing more than following the recent trend of executive branch folks doing pretty much anything they want to, whether authorized by legislative initiative or not, and relying on the courts (or the people) to force these bureaucrats to follow the law. We are not only seeing our freedoms reduced by executive fiat, but costing countless dollars in litigation costs.


  9. - lake county democrat - Wednesday, Aug 1, 12 @ 10:03 am:

    I’m not endorsing this behavior and admit it’s a dicey area - if the Illinois Supreme Court reaffirmed it’s previous interpretation of the clause and Quinn kept doing it I’d definitely condemn it.


  10. - East Sider - Wednesday, Aug 1, 12 @ 10:03 am:

    This is a stunt to allow downstate democrat incumbents a chance to “lash out at liberal Chicago politicians.” I’m sure Dan Beiser and Bill Haine are already crafting so-called “legislative updates” (aka: political mailers by for at taxpayers’ expense) supporting 2nd Amendment rights and pandering to gun owners.


  11. - Small Town Liberal - Wednesday, Aug 1, 12 @ 10:10 am:

    Cinci - If you think executive action is a recent trend, you really need to brush up on your history.

    Also, the legislature never defined exactly what an AV could be used for, and I don’t agree that this goes way beyond Ogilvie’s AV. Both added language, both retained language.

    If you think it’s unconstitutional, take it to court. Otherwise, vote on it as is or override it. Is it really different than if it was simply vetoed?


  12. - OneMan - Wednesday, Aug 1, 12 @ 10:11 am:

    I refuse to believe that Gov. Quinn would do something with no chance of success because he wanted to have a one-shot publicity stunt.

    And I refuse to believe that NIU isn’t going to win a national football championship within the next 10 years. Doesn’t mean my thoughts are based in reality.


  13. - Kerfuffle - Wednesday, Aug 1, 12 @ 10:28 am:

    Small Town Liberal - “Also, the legislature never defined exactly what an AV could be used for”……The legislature didn’t define it because they couldn’t. It came out of the Constitutional Convention (and is now part of the IL Constitution).


  14. - Small Town Liberal - Wednesday, Aug 1, 12 @ 10:35 am:

    Kerfuffle - I’m no expert on such things, but I read the article Rich linked, and that was one of the two solutions recommended by the writer (an attorney who worked for Ogilvie apparently)


  15. - Dirty Red - Wednesday, Aug 1, 12 @ 10:38 am:

    OneMan ftw.

    This reminds me of Rod’s Rewrite to do Right campaign.


  16. - Rich Miller - Wednesday, Aug 1, 12 @ 10:39 am:

    ===The legislature didn’t define it because they couldn’t.===

    Actually, both chambers have defined what the governor’s AV powers are by rule. And this AV is a clear violation of those rules.


  17. - AC - Wednesday, Aug 1, 12 @ 10:41 am:

    If only he had such power over the state budget, he could have paid employees the raises he agreed to…


  18. - Anonymous - Wednesday, Aug 1, 12 @ 11:17 am:

    But didn’t those House and Senate “rules” get get ignored, or suspended, when the free rides for seniors was part of an AV penned by Blagojevich?


  19. - Been There - Wednesday, Aug 1, 12 @ 11:25 am:

    ===If you think it’s unconstitutional, take it to court.====
    There isn’t anything to take to court and there never will be anything to take to court. That’s Rich’s whole point. Unless this becomes law, which it won’t because the sponsor won’t move it or it won’t get out of the rules committee, there is nothing to take legal action on. All media hype.


  20. - Cincinnatus - Wednesday, Aug 1, 12 @ 11:28 am:

    One wonders if Dave Luechtefeld plans to let the underlying bill fail or if he is going to drive an override…


  21. - Todd - Wednesday, Aug 1, 12 @ 11:36 am:

    Been there– yes there is. And it is being looked at.

    Quinn issued the AV. In a couple days, the bill will have hit the 60 day mark defined by the constitution to act, I believe he has fulfilled that obligation by the AV to act and so if the AV goes beyond what is constitutionally acceptable, then the underlying bill becomes law. At least that is the theory that the lawyers are looking at right now. . .


  22. - Javorica - Wednesday, Aug 1, 12 @ 12:07 pm:

    Quinn at least has enough smarts to know that while this bill will never get through, it’s great publicity for him and Rahm with the democrats in the urban communities. On the contrary people who understand a bit more about the process know that he is still inept and the bill he gutted was drafted by pro gun legislators who won’t be happy Quinn used his questionable AV power to gut their bill. They likely just won’t let it out of committee or won’t call it for a vote. Very Franks-esk in PR.


  23. - Yellow Dog Democrat - Wednesday, Aug 1, 12 @ 12:10 pm:

    Oy. Its been a long time since I looked at the rules.

    I don’t believe the AV can be ignored, although it can be dismissed by a ruling of the chair which is subject to roll call.

    Unlike Rich, I’m not completely ruling out an override.

    There are lots of downstate Democrats who are happy to vote against an assault weapons ban and distance themselves from the governor, and lots of suburban Republicans that Democrats would be only too happy to see on the record as opposing an assault weapons ban.


  24. - Rich Miller - Wednesday, Aug 1, 12 @ 12:12 pm:

    ===Unlike Rich, I’m not completely ruling out an override.===

    I’m not, either. All I’m saying is that no matter what happens this AV is deader than a rock on a stump.


  25. - Yellow Dog Democrat - Wednesday, Aug 1, 12 @ 12:16 pm:

    My bad, Rich. Unlike the bill’s sponsor, I’m not completely ruling out an override.

    From CBS News:

    Luechtefeld’s measure would have allowed Illinois residents to have ammunition purchased from in-state companies shipped to them. Currently, Illinois residents can only have ammunition shipped if it’s bought out of state.

    He added that he doesn’t think his bill is controversial, and that Quinn’s move kills it.


  26. - Rich Miller - Wednesday, Aug 1, 12 @ 12:19 pm:

    ===and that Quinn’s move kills it.===

    A failed override attempt would kill it as well, however.


  27. - Yellow Dog Democrat - Wednesday, Aug 1, 12 @ 12:23 pm:

    In response to all the debate over whether the AV is Constitutional, let me just add one point.

    As Rich may recall and I’m sure Todd remembers, Gov. Ryan used his amendatory veto to add language banning discrimination against gay Americans to a bill which amended the Human Rights Act to prohibit discrimination against motorcyclists in public accommodations.

    Many of us who don’t have a vote in the General Assembly would probably assume that AV clearly changed the intent of the underlying bill and should have been rejected by the House.

    As I recall - and Todd remembers this one better than I do - it was upheld by the House with a razor-thin margin.

    My caveat is this: the House doesn’t rule on whether an AV is “Constitutional,” that is for the courts to decide.


  28. - wordslinger - Wednesday, Aug 1, 12 @ 12:34 pm:

    –Actually, both chambers have defined what the governor’s AV powers are by rule.–

    The GA can’t trump or interpret the Constitution. It may be unconstitutional, but that’s for the Supremes to say.


  29. - Agricola - Wednesday, Aug 1, 12 @ 12:41 pm:

    ===I don’t believe the AV can be ignored, although it can be dismissed by a ruling of the chair which is subject to roll call.===

    Not to be rude, but an AV most certainly can be ignored. Here are two of the ways in which it can be ignored: (1) if no legislator files a motion to accept the AV (and there is no mechanism to compel the filing of such a motion); or (2) if a motion is filed but not called for a vote.

    Also, even if the Senate were to accept the AV’s changes, that action does not change the ability of the House to ignore the AV.


  30. - Todd - Wednesday, Aug 1, 12 @ 12:56 pm:

    the bill was HB-1039:

    http://www.ilga.gov/legislation/legisnet92/hbgroups/hb/920HB1039gms.html

    The bill died as it was not called.

    the question could now become, as i eluded to earlier, what if the court finds the governor acted outside his authority and did not properly return the bill, so it should be law since he did not follow the proscribed procedure?


  31. - Yellow Dog Democrat - Wednesday, Aug 1, 12 @ 12:57 pm:

    True, Rich. Luechtefeld seems to be assuming that an override attempt would fail though. I give Todd more credit.

    @Agricola -

    Not rude at all. Both the “exceptions” you point out have the affect of accepting the Governor’s actions as a total veto. That’s an admission of defeat for the underlying bill, not what I would call “ignoring” the governor’s action. But I think we’re splitting hairs at this point.


  32. - Cincinnatus - Wednesday, Aug 1, 12 @ 1:25 pm:

    YDD,

    Splitting hairs is what keeps most of the legislators occupied, and most of the lawyers in this state busy billing hours!


  33. - Yellow Dog Democrat - Wednesday, Aug 1, 12 @ 2:06 pm:

    Todd -

    Seems like an unlikely scenerio, if the article Rich links to is correct. Although it is from 1977.


  34. - Kerfuffle - Wednesday, Aug 1, 12 @ 4:36 pm:

    Rich - Appreciate your comments regarding what the legislatre has done in regard to implementing rules for AVs but I don’t think legislative branch rules on how the executive branch can use (or in this case misuse) its constitutional authority holds much weight. I could be wrong - and often am according to my wife.


  35. - Yellow Dog Democrat - Wednesday, Aug 1, 12 @ 7:26 pm:

    To Rich’s earlier point, here is the applicable Senate Rule (emphasis added):

    9-2. Amendatory Vetoes.
    (a) The Governor’s specific recommendations for change with respect to a bill returned under subsection (e) of Section 9 of Article IV of the Illinois Constitution shall be limited to addressing the Governor’s objections to portions of a bill, the general merit of which the Governor recognizes, and shall not alter the fundamental purpose or legislative scheme set forth in the bill as passed.


  36. - unclesam - Wednesday, Aug 1, 12 @ 9:11 pm:

    If I recall correctly, Speaker Madigan over the last few years (especially during the final years of Blago) has instituted a process to have every AV thoroughly reviewed to ensure the Gov did not exceed his constitutional authority, and if the review process finds that the AV issued did exceed the constitutional restrictions then the Speaker simply did not allow any motion on that AV to advance and die in House Rules.


  37. - Yellow Dog Democrat - Thursday, Aug 2, 12 @ 7:27 am:

    @Uncle Sam -

    I think you are mostly right. I believe they are reviewed to determine whether they comport with House Rules, which are substantially similar to the Senate Rule posted above.

    Part of the reason I doubt the courts will intervene is that the legislature has, by rule, put a system in place for dealing with Amendatory Vetoes it feels are not germane. Its nonsensical for the General Assembly to run to the courts to seek relief.

    If, however, the bill were enacted with the AV, the Illinois State Rifle Association would probably have a strong case for striking it down. That’s where the constitutional question becomes legally relevant.


Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.


* Statehouse institution Vicki Crawford moves on
* So, why not just release the bill?
* Fun with terribly confusing numbers
* Budget veto overrides lift higher ed bond ratings
* *** UPDATED x7 - Oops in proclamation? - Pawar, Koehler, Kennedy, Biss, ILGOP, Pritzker respond *** Special session proclamation issued
* Question of the day
* What does "messaging" really mean to Rauner?
* *** UPDATED x2 - ILGOP pounces on Madigan - DGA responds *** Rauner still won't release details of his proposed AV
* Is Rauner staffer on the way out?
* Rauner: Special session to commence Wednesday
* Cullerton again calls on Rauner to hold leaders' meetings before veto
* *** UPDATED x2 - Pritzker responds to ILGOP - ILGOP responds *** Pritzker again tackles the Madigan question
* Kennedy talks about how to address gun violence and what it's done to his own life
* Two political views of SB 1
* Another great explainer from Rhodes
* *** UPDATED x1 - ICPR responds *** A bit more on that curious Tribune passage
* Why Z had to leave
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today's edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)
* Yesterday's stories

Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...

...............

...............

...............
<


Loading


* BROWN: Downstaters ready to bail on Rauner over.....
* Education standoff in Springfield: Governor, la.....
* Mike Madigan doesn’t care..
* Woe to Illinois as Gov. Rauner throws in with t.....
* Governor Rauner calls for special session to so.....
* Illinois governor calls another special session.....
* Illinois governor calls another special session.....
* “Let's not play political games,” News 8 one-on.....
* Trade unions offer info session - Herald & Review..


* Dog sculptures downtown Chicago honor police canine unit
* Gunman who shot Chicago police officer still at large
* Jury awards $150M in punitive damages in testosterone case
* Credit rating improves for 7 Illinois universities.
* Supporters, foes clash over underwater oil pipeline's future
* Illinois employees under investigation for derogatory emails
* Central Illinois struggles to find solution for bed bugs
* Thunderstorms exacerbate flooding in northern Illinois
* Illinois governor calls another special session on education
* The Latest: Gov. Rauner calls school-funding special session

* Rauner: Special sessions start Wednesday for school funding
* State employee under investigation for derogatory emails
* Thunderstorms exacerbate flooding in northern Illinois
* Rauner says special sessions start Wednesday for school funding
* Rauner makes another demand to get school funding bill
* Cullerton discourages school-funding veto; seeks discussion
* John Curran to replace Christine Radogno in Illinois Senate
* Schools caught in middle while waiting for state funding
* Rauner U of I trustee pick a generous GOP donor
* Rauner sets deadline for SB 1, says he'll call special session

* Aldermen blast city, McCormick Place officials over Navy Pier TIF plan
* Trump calls on GOP to repeal Obamacare amid doubt on vote
* Morningstar buys stake in responsible-investing research firm
* Morningstar buys stake in responsible investing firm
* AbbVie ordered to pay $150 million damages in 'Low-T' trial


* 2 wounded in Gresham shooting
* Police searching for 17-year-old girl with mood disorder
* Credit rating improves for 7 Illinois universities
* 2 charged with shooting at home in Aurora
* AP sources: Trump speaks to advisers about firing Sessions
* Police: Man attempts to burglarize Mount Prospect home
* SWEET: Rep. Mike Quigley’s questions for Jared Kushner
* John McCain to return to Senate for Tuesday’s health care vote
* Victory over Cubs felt like playoffs for win-starved White Sox
* Three Chicagoans charged with robberies, carjackings in Hammond


* Paula Hess honored posthumously as IHSA dance official of the year
* New penalties in place for youth caught vaping in Park Ridge
* 1 dead, 7 hurt in Lake Shore Drive crash in Uptown
* Cowboys dump WR Lucky Whitehead after link to shoplifting arrest
* John McCain's return to Senate injects momentum into GOP health care battle
* With 'Better Deal,' Democrats (temporarily) calm a restive left
* Man carjacked on I-80 ramp in New Lenox, police say
* Driver killed in interstate shootout near St. Louis was heavily armed, threatened to kill co-workers, police say
* Cubs' stretched bullpen could benefit from reinforcements
* Ex-Bull Derrick Rose agrees to one-year deal with Cavaliers


» Rauner Calls School-Funding Special Session
» Cullerton Discourages School-Funding Veto; Seeks Discussion
» A Closer Look At The Group That Could Inform Rauner's Agenda
» Illinois Finally Compensating Unjustly Imprisoned
» Chicago Festival To Mark Pokemon Go Anniversary Goes Awry
» A Closer Look At The Group That Could Inform Rauner’s Agenda
» Restraining Order On Cook County Soda Tax Extended A Week
» Illinois Steel Company Proposes To Move Plant To Indiana
» State Week: Despite Budget Veto, Rauner Presses For School Money
» Special Session Slated If Rauner Doesn't Get School Bill


* Rauner: Special sessions start Wednesday for school funding
* Our View: Now is your time to weigh in on Y-block
* State employee under investigation for derogatory emails
* Thunderstorms exacerbate flooding in northern Illinois
* Bernard Schoenburg: Klickna looks back on 44 years in education
* Rauner says special sessions start Wednesday for school funding
* Rauner makes another demand to get school funding bill
* Cullerton discourages school-funding veto; seeks discussion
* John Curran to replace Christine Radogno in Illinois Senate
* Schools caught in middle while waiting for state funding


* Collinsville man hit in face with handgun, suspect flees, police say
* Hannah Caraway talks about her goals and what drives her
* Water treatment project nears completion
* Greene, Scott counties police news, July 24
* Alton panel favors 1 percent rise in hotel tax, raising electricity tax
* Here’s how to see the International Space Station in the sky this week
* Stunning Aurora Borealis and Aurora Australis from space in ultra-high def
* Experts, community members discuss mental health in African-American community
* What will animals do during the eclipse? Scientists aren't entirely sure.
* Driver in fatal crash from Moline


* New to camping? Learn to 'Camp With a Ranger'
* Images: White Sox top Cubs in opener of Crosstown Series, 3-1
* Here's what happens if governor vetoes just part of school funding bill
* Son cut mom's throat in Round Lake Park, police say
* Angry about flood, Mundelein residents pack board meeting

* Hultgren praises teamwork in fighting rece...
* Letter: Health bill and hunger - Kane Coun...
* Hultgren seeking applicants for STEM Schol...
* Construction of Massive Neutrino Experimen...
* Editorial: We need answers on Trump and Ru...
* Rep. Randy Hultgren fields questions at Le...
* Teacher raised in Yorkville running agains...
* Hultgren backs change to Voting Rights Act...
* Hultgren, Helsinki panel call on Trump to ...
* Hultgren meets five Yorkville workers who ...

* Senate Introduces Pathway to Citizenship f......
* Key Senate subcommittee restores funds for......

* Sen. Duckworth, Illinois attorney general,......
* Sen. Duckworth, Illinois attorney general,......

* Armed & fabulous: In Chicago, women worried about violence join gun club.
* The Life Of Land After Frac Sand
* The White Sox Report: Times Change
* TrackNotes: Lazy, Hazy, Crazy Dog Days
* The Weekend In Chicago Rock
* Wait Wait . . . Don’t Tell Me! in Millennium Park, and more things to do in Chicago this week
* “The Driver’s Side” – News From The Motorist’s Perspective
* Governor Rauner calls General Assembly back into special session for school funding
* Bossy Chicago leads the way for woman-owned businesses
* Thorner/O'Neil: Immigration: An Issue of Importance to all Americans (Part 2)


* Illinois Awarded Funds to Offer Advanced Training on Detecting Impaired Driving
* Illinois EPA Announces Upcoming Household Hazardous Waste Collection Events
* IEMA Highlights Emergency Preparedness for People with Access and Functional Needs in May - Ready Illinois website offers preparedness tips for people, caregivers
* First Lady Launches Illinois Family Connects
* Governor and Lt. Governor Unveil 2016 Journal of Local Government Shared Service Best Practices

  
* Google Pixel 2 Snapdragon 836, Apple’s Siri + The Rock & more – Pocketnow Daily
* What is it with blue? New blue color clued for Galaxy Note 8
* In this iPhone 8 CAD leak, the display is on
* T-Mobile brings scam call tools to MetroPCS from July 25
* iRobot Wants to Sell Mapping Data Collected by Roomba Vacuums to a Tech Company Like Apple
* Qualcomm Says Tech Group Supporting Apple is 'Misdirecting' ITC With 'Coordinated Effort'
* Gazelle putting on extra discounts for its secondhand iPhones and more

* Young trio enjoys 1st taste of rivalry with Cubs
* Swarzak notches long-awaited 1st career save
* Sox ride Gonzalez, HRs to down Chi-Town rivals
* Rodon, Lackey set as Chi-Town rivals duel
* Rodon eyes rebound as he faces crosstown foes
* Sox ride Gonzalez, HRs to down Chi-Town rivals
* Prospect Burdi to have Tommy John surgery


Main Menu
Home
Illinois
YouTube
Pundit rankings
Obama
Subscriber Content
Durbin
Burris
Blagojevich Trial
Advertising
Updated Posts
Polls

Archives
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005

Syndication

RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0
WordPress




Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller