Capitol Fax.com - Your Illinois News Radar » *** UPDATED x3 - IL AFL-CIO, Pritzker respond - Veto issued *** On to the next crisis!
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      About     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact Rich Miller
CapitolFax.com
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
*** UPDATED x3 - IL AFL-CIO, Pritzker respond - Veto issued *** On to the next crisis!

Friday, Sep 29, 2017 - Posted by Rich Miller

* Synopsis of SB1905

Creates the Collective Bargaining Freedom Act. Provides that it is the policy of the State that employers, employees, and their labor organizations are free to bargain collectively. Provides that the authority to enact laws or rules that restrict the use of union security agreements between an employer and a labor organization vests exclusively with the General Assembly. Prohibits local governments from enforcing any such law or rule.

The bill was sent to the governor on August 2nd, so today is his 60-day deadline to act. He’ll undoubtedly veto it, but in the wake of the GOP fury over HB40, can he hold enough House Republicans off the bill to prevent an override?

* The legislation received 40 votes in the Senate, with Republicans Anderson, Fowler and McCann voting with the Democrats.

It only received 67 votes in the House, short of an override. Three House Democrats were listed as absent or excused. And three House Republicans voted for the bill (Long, McCombie and Severin). But if you click here you’ll see several potential HGOP flips who didn’t vote either way in late June, just before the real craziness started with the tax/budget overrides, the subsequent Rauner staff fiasco and the governor’s flip-flop on HB40.

Gonna be an interesting floor fight come veto session time.

…Adding… From a pal…

Would be ironic if Rauner’s “no social agenda” ended up undoing his very real anti-union agenda

Yep.

*** UPDATE ***  As expected…

Bill No.: SB 1905

An Act Concerning Government

Action: Vetoed

Veto Message for SB 1905

September 29, 2017

To the Honorable Members of

The Illinois Senate,

100th General Assembly:

Today I veto Senate Bill 1905 from the 100th General Assembly, which prohibits local communities from allowing individual workers a choice in whether or not they want to pay a union as a condition of employment. This legislation would damage the economic health of Illinois’ communities by removing their freedom to determine the best interests of their workforces and employers.

Illinois lags behind its neighbors’ economic and job growth despite our many advantages. Our State’s workforce is fleeing and aging, losing 250,000 people and having the worst personal income growth in the country over the last decade. Individuals, families, and businesses who should be eager to come to Illinois stay away. Manufacturers too often leave across our borders or never even consider investing in new job creation here. Many businesses will only expand in communities that offer employee freedom of choice.

Part of our struggle is that every state that shares a border with Illinois has already enacted true worker freedom, allowing individuals in those states to determine whether they want to contribute to a labor union. Many states around us are growing union jobs as well as non-union jobs faster than Illinois because more of their communities give workers choice while not preventing employees from joining unions if they choose.

By contrast, Senate Bill 1905 would move Illinois in the opposite direction by destroying the freedom of Illinois’ local communities to choose reforms that can make their economies more competitive, help their businesses grow, and give the freedom to individual workers to support a union at their own discretion.

This legislation forces local communities to follow a one-size-fits-all model of government, no matter how detrimental they believe it is to them. Our goal should not be to limit workers’ ability to join a union but rather to give communities the freedom to embrace new tools to compete economically and to recruit businesses and talent rather than have their choices dictated by Springfield.

Therefore, pursuant to Section 9(b) of Article IV of the Illinois Constitution of 1970, I hereby return Senate Bill 1905, entitled “AN ACT concerning government”, with the foregoing objections, vetoed in its entirety.

Sincerely,

Bruce Rauner

GOVERNOR

*** UPDATE 2 ***  Pritzker campaign…

“Just this week, we saw Bruce Rauner celebrate an assault on workers’ rights as the Supreme Court decided to hear Janus vs. AFSCME, and now he’s continuing these attacks on the state level,” said JB Pritzker. “The hardworking men and women of the labor movement deserve a partner in Springfield who will defend their right to collectively bargain, not one who wages war on it. When I’m governor, the labor movement will always have a seat at the table as we fight for working families, protect workers’ rights, and work to raise the wage floor. I urge the General Assembly to override this failed governor’s veto.”

*** UPDATE 3 *** IL AFL-CIO…

Statement by Illinois AFL-CIO President Michael T. Carrigan concerning Rauner’s veto of Senate Bill 1905

“Gov. Bruce Rauner’s veto of the Collective Bargaining Freedom Act (SB 1905) follows one of the only trends he has shown any consistency and determination – depressing wages, destroying unions and squeezing the middle class.

“Recognizing existing global and national races to the bottom on wages, this bill simply insures that counties and towns cannot make up different sets of laws concerning negotiations between workers and employers. Such layers of laws and jurisdictions would undermine Illinois workers in all our communities.

“Rauner has not done his job. He cannot point to a single accomplishment. His legacy will be crisis, division, and shockingly erratic leadership. This bill passed with Democrat and Republican votes. We will work to overturn this veto in the General Assembly.”

       

17 Comments
  1. - Precinct Captain - Friday, Sep 29, 17 @ 11:13 am:

    Re: the addition

    The tears would be delicious.


  2. - Retired Educator - Friday, Sep 29, 17 @ 11:41 am:

    He has managed to tick off so many Republicans, that no veto is safe. His caucus is gone in both houses. This veto session will be interesting to watch.


  3. - DeseDemDose - Friday, Sep 29, 17 @ 11:41 am:

    Hopefully AFSCME is not asleep at the wheel and are contacting their House and Senate reps for Votes.


  4. - Ya don't say - Friday, Sep 29, 17 @ 11:42 am:

    Bye bye


  5. - Honeybear - Friday, Sep 29, 17 @ 11:45 am:

    There it is
    The antidote to
    Rauners Great Labor War
    The GA is trying to prevent it
    With all my heart
    I pray for override

    This would destroy Rauners Legacy
    More than anything

    republican GA members
    You want revenge on Rauner!
    Vote to override
    Or we’ll see that
    Destroying Labor
    Was more important
    Than
    Protecting the unborn


  6. - Grand Avenue - Friday, Sep 29, 17 @ 11:56 am:

    Scott Drury was absent on the last vote - and he voted against the last AFSCME bill.

    How does he vote on the override? IF he manages to win the nomination, he’ll be needing a boatload of union money (although they’ll be actively against him in the primary).


  7. - inartful? - Friday, Sep 29, 17 @ 12:16 pm:

    w/o home-rule pre-emption?


  8. - Anaheim Willy - Friday, Sep 29, 17 @ 12:35 pm:

    So does the law basically just restrict local governments from enacting labor laws related to collective bargaining?


  9. - Anon - Friday, Sep 29, 17 @ 12:44 pm:

    Rauner could be moving from Governor Junk to Governor Why Did He Even Bother?


  10. - Seats - Friday, Sep 29, 17 @ 12:50 pm:

    Can someone dumb down the ramifications from a veto on this for me?


  11. - Texas Red - Friday, Sep 29, 17 @ 1:07 pm:

    simple explanation , this bill would limit the rights of communities such as Lincolnshire, from creating local RTW zones….

    “A new proposal in Illinois would ban local governments from adopting right-to-work (RTW) laws.”

    tinyurl.com/y9tsdzsz


  12. - Anonymice - Friday, Sep 29, 17 @ 1:09 pm:

    Currently, under current interpretations of the National Labor Relations Act, which governs private sector labor relations/collective bargaining, STATES are allowed to enact so-called “Right to Work” laws that allow individuals in a bargaining unit, covered by a CBA, to refuse to pay any union dues/fair share fees. This Bill codifies that notion in the ILCS; essentially, it preempts a political subdivision (that is not named the GA) from enacting RTW within its jurisdiction. Allowing localities/municipalities/counties etc. to create these so-called “empowerment zones” or right to work zones” would result in a quilt-like patchwork of labor laws from city to city, county to county, etc. - the very thing the National Labor Relations Act sought to prevent from happening. Once again, this only affects the private-sector, and, further, it merely codifies what is already the law of the land…at least is the 7th Circuit, that is.


  13. - Anonymice - Friday, Sep 29, 17 @ 1:10 pm:

    ^sorry for the grammatical errors, typing on the phone is never easy.


  14. - A guy - Friday, Sep 29, 17 @ 1:27 pm:

    At this point, you’re better off asking Rep. Durkin.


  15. - Seats - Friday, Sep 29, 17 @ 1:29 pm:

    Thanks Anonymice.


  16. - igotgotgotgotnotime - Friday, Sep 29, 17 @ 1:47 pm:

    “Labor is prior to, and independent of, capital. Capital is only the fruit of labor, and could never have existed if labor had not first existed. Labor is the superior of capital, and deserves much the higher consideration. Capital has its rights, which are as worthy of protection as any other rights.
    A. Lincoln


  17. - Anonymice - Friday, Sep 29, 17 @ 4:33 pm:

    vetoed….color me shocked.


Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.


* Isabel’s afternoon roundup
* Pritzker says he 'remains skeptical' about Bears proposal: 'I'm not sure that this is among the highest priorities for taxpayers' (Updated)
* It’s just a bill
* It sure looks like lawmakers were right to be worried
* Flashback: Candidate Johnson opposed Bears stadium subsidies (Updated x2)
* $117.7B Economic Impact: More Than Healthcare Providers, Hospitals Are Economic Engines
* Open thread
* Isabel’s morning briefing
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today's edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)
* Live coverage
* Yesterday's stories

Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............


Loading


Main Menu
Home
Illinois
YouTube
Pundit rankings
Obama
Subscriber Content
Durbin
Burris
Blagojevich Trial
Advertising
Updated Posts
Polls

Archives
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005

Syndication

RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0




Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller