Capitol Fax.com - Your Illinois News Radar » Question of the day
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      About     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact Rich Miller
CapitolFax.com
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
Question of the day

Wednesday, Jul 9, 2025 - Posted by Isabel Miller

* It’s been just over a week since the Legislative Information System’s General Assembly website made the switch to its new layout



I’m still getting used to it.

* The Question: What about you? Is it easier to navigate? Are there features you miss, or any quirks or bugs you’ve noticed?

       

29 Comments »
  1. - The Real Downstate - Wednesday, Jul 9, 25 @ 10:21 am:

    What I don’t get is how all my saved links to the website suddenly stopped working. Each statute, public act, and bill already has unique numbers. Why weren’t those numbers used for the URLs, so they wouldn’t be broken when the system updated? So dumb.


  2. - rincoiltaffoon - Wednesday, Jul 9, 25 @ 10:23 am:

    Spare a thought for all the state agencies, legal entities, industry, and libraries throughout the land who now have a whole lotta dead links to fix. The rest is just new tricks for this old dog, which I am thankfully still flexible enough to roll with.


  3. - TheInvisibleMan - Wednesday, Jul 9, 25 @ 10:27 am:

    It appears my concerns with the navigation of bills was addressed.

    Relating to how the bills are displayed in groups now, instead of a dropdown. As well as updating the links to now show the ‘visited color’ to bills that have already been viewed.

    This makes navigation much better.

    I like it.


  4. - Friendly Bob Adams - Wednesday, Jul 9, 25 @ 10:29 am:

    Looks great, though


  5. - TheInvisibleMan - Wednesday, Jul 9, 25 @ 10:32 am:

    “who now have a whole lotta dead links to fix.”

    A quick check of some old links, shows the new site is using 302 redirects for old links to point to the newer version.

    Probably not many dead links, if any at all.


  6. - Just Another Anon - Wednesday, Jul 9, 25 @ 10:33 am:

    It irritates me that a quick google of a stautory section gives a first link, which appears should link directly to the section searched, goes instead directly to the index, not the section sought.


  7. - Nick Name - Wednesday, Jul 9, 25 @ 10:47 am:

    I had to update all my links and favorites too.

    The old site wasn’t much to look at, but it was easy as heck to navigate and find what you were looking for, whether you needed bills, public acts (going back decades), rules, statutes, back issues of the Illinois Register, whatever. Of all the state websites I’ve had to look stuff up on, the old Illinois website was the best.

    So far, the new website seems just as easy to navigate, which is good. But I am of the “if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it” school of thought.


  8. - Socially DIstant Watcher - Wednesday, Jul 9, 25 @ 10:48 am:

    The website used to have links to pages from prior general assemblies, listing members, bills, public acts, etc. I haven’t found those pages in the new website, so it’s harder now to follow links in current statutes to see when specific causes were enacted, or when one legislator replaced another, or really any of the historical records that were thete. I miss that.


  9. - Sigh - Wednesday, Jul 9, 25 @ 10:49 am:

    I am not usually one opposed to change and can pretty quickly get used to tech updates. However this is not good. The old website definitely needed some sprucing up and would have welcomed some cosmetic changes or a massive overhaul that actually was a better site. They kept the exact same 20+ year old functions but just made them more complicated. So basically it’s too similar to the old website but not different enough to be an improvement. The biggest issue is the need to download a bill PDF for mobile or minimized browsers. Also I usually search bills by member names it now requires like 5 more clicks to find something. Additionally, the broken links have been a big problem for me and should have been an easy catch.


  10. - Chicago Dem - Wednesday, Jul 9, 25 @ 10:50 am:

    It’s the WORST! Slow to use, harder to search legislation. I prefer convenience and utility over pretty pictures. I see the pretty pictures in real life when I go to Springfield.


  11. - rincoiltaffoon - Wednesday, Jul 9, 25 @ 10:50 am:

    All the JCAR links are still broken. Fewer broken links but still in the realm of “whole lotta”.


  12. - Space Cowboy - Wednesday, Jul 9, 25 @ 11:00 am:

    My work requires me to root around in the ILCS a lot, so I miss the muscle memory of going right to that link on the home page. However, I’m quickly learning how to find what i want. So no real criticisms, just getting used to it. Overall its a better looking interface and seems to be running smoothly.


  13. - Annon'in - Wednesday, Jul 9, 25 @ 11:02 am:

    Another fabulous redo. Still miss the old section index that came with the print edition.


  14. - Horseshoe Voter - Wednesday, Jul 9, 25 @ 11:19 am:

    I once looked up a bill from the 2017-2018 GA. Now I cannot get it to reset to the current GA. I have messed with it a long time and I’m sure a more tech-savvy person would’ve figured it out by now. My workaround is to open a Chrome window instead of Edge and that one works. I try not to be stuck in the past and to embrace change, but this one hasn’t been an intuitive transition for me.


  15. - Leatherneck - Wednesday, Jul 9, 25 @ 11:31 am:

    Bring back the old ILGA site. Much simpler to use, could get to info quickly, and was easy to use when having to use a phone browser.

    Plus the old ILGA site has been around in its former functionality since early 2003. Back when the site was still http://www.legis.state.il.us/, it was renamed www.ilga.gov on Dec. 18, 2004.

    Looks like the old GA site was updated in early 2003? Wayback Machine shows the old version of the site on a Dec. 2, 2002 capture, but the next capture is Feb. 3, 2003 and the familiar old site first appears. Hence almost 22 1/2 years of institutional memory about the old functional ILGA site has been put to waste.

    In my opinion, the redesigned ILGA.gov is the New Coke of 2025. Bring back the old site or always give users the option to use both incarnations.


  16. - Linus - Wednesday, Jul 9, 25 @ 11:54 am:

    ==New Coke of 2025==

    That sums up my own experience with the new site pretty well, too. I’m a fan of the new look and layout, but am slowly and painfully finding my way.

    I’ve run into some of the same challenges as other commenters. My (delayed) discovery of the “select General Assembly” dropdown at the top of the home page has helped me solve some of those problems.


  17. - Linus - Wednesday, Jul 9, 25 @ 11:55 am:

    *correction: I’m NOT a fan of new look and layout, but it’ll all work out. Eventually. Amirite??


  18. - Leffy Lefty - Wednesday, Jul 9, 25 @ 12:08 pm:

    I don’t use the ILGA site much - maybe 5x/year. I will mention that the Illinois EPA site was done this year too. I find it completely unworkable. The worst is that all my old links are dead except for 2. No redirects.

    Also - why does Google search, on IL government sites but also this website as well as others I come across, stink so much? No sorting, seemingly random results, just useless.


  19. - Yappatron - Wednesday, Jul 9, 25 @ 12:15 pm:

    Not a fan. Held off all session because I needed the muscle memory to navigate ilga quickly. Now that it is being forced, not a fan of having to spend time learning the same thing in a flashy new format.


  20. - Three Dimensional Checkers - Wednesday, Jul 9, 25 @ 12:22 pm:

    It seems basically the same. Maybe a little easier to navigate to previous general assemblies, which makes any legislative history research a tiny bit easier.


  21. - Homebody - Wednesday, Jul 9, 25 @ 12:44 pm:

    I agree with Sigh.

    == So basically it’s too similar to the old website but not different enough to be an improvement. ==

    Maybe there were a bunch of optimizations done under the hood, but I feel like a lot of the state agency website changes I’ve seen in the last year or so have not actually significantly improved the sites.

    It reminds me of how Microsoft insists on moving things around in Office every couple years, seemingly for no particular reason.


  22. - charles in charge - Wednesday, Jul 9, 25 @ 12:56 pm:

    I am admittedly change-averse but so far I don’t like it. I’d like to hear from those who undertook this project what problems they thought they were solving and why this is an improvement. I agree with the commenter who wrote, “basically it’s too similar to the old website but not different enough to be an improvement.” Maybe the old site looked a little dated, but I wouldn’t even say that the appearance of the new one is any better.


  23. - Shadowdocket - Wednesday, Jul 9, 25 @ 1:01 pm:

    Not a fan AT ALL. I used the old site @10x per week to look up bills and public acts easily as I already knew the bill or act reference… it take so many more clicks to get to the place I need to go and it’s definitely NOT intuitive.


  24. - Socially DIstant Watcher - Wednesday, Jul 9, 25 @ 1:27 pm:

    @Three Dimensional:

    There’s a pulldown on the homepage to previous general assemblies, but that takes you to a page that lists only some of the features the old site had. The list of public acts, for instance, isn’t itself a list of links to each bill, with text and status and votes and more, like the old site had. It’s just a PDF with the effective date, the PA number and the bill number. If you want anything more , then you have to go find the bill number separately. It’s less functional than the old site


  25. - Captain Ron - Wednesday, Jul 9, 25 @ 1:29 pm:

    Looks nice then all downhill from there


  26. - Socially DIstant Watcher - Wednesday, Jul 9, 25 @ 1:44 pm:

    I miss having bill searches on each page.


  27. - Rich Miller - Wednesday, Jul 9, 25 @ 2:04 pm:

    ===I’d like to hear from those who undertook this project what problems they thought they were solving and why this is an improvement===

    So would I. Just assigned Isabel the story.


  28. - Rich Miller - Wednesday, Jul 9, 25 @ 2:09 pm:

    ===why does Google search, on IL government sites but also this website===

    All of Google sucks now. The idiots have broken their own website.


  29. - Rich Miller - Wednesday, Jul 9, 25 @ 2:13 pm:

    ===Maybe there were a bunch of optimizations done under the hood===

    Considering how slow and clunky the new site is, I’m kinda doubting it.


TrackBack URI

Anonymous commenters, uncivil comments, rumor-mongering, disinformation and profanity of any kind will be deleted.

(required)

(not required)



* Isabel’s afternoon roundup
* Your feel-good story of the day
* Question of the day
* Catching up with the federal candidates
* New York’s Democratic Governor Has Vetoed A Similar Bill Twice
* Open thread
* Isabel’s morning briefing
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Supplement to today's edition
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today's edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)
* Selected press releases (Live updates)
* Live coverage
* Yesterday's stories

Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............


Loading


Main Menu
Home
Illinois
YouTube
Pundit rankings
Obama
Subscriber Content
Durbin
Burris
Blagojevich Trial
Advertising
Updated Posts
Polls

Archives
July 2025
June 2025
May 2025
April 2025
March 2025
February 2025
January 2025
December 2024
November 2024
October 2024
September 2024
August 2024
July 2024
June 2024
May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005

Syndication

RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0




Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller