Capitol Fax.com - Your Illinois News Radar

Latest Post | Last 10 Posts | Archives

Previous Post: Fee hike decision
Next Post: Blogroll additions

Chamber statement

Posted in:

• Illinois

The statement from the Illinois Chamber about the Cook County judge’s ruling on the fee increase follows. Also, I read the court’s decision very early in the morning and misread part of it. Only the fees collected from the Workers Compensation surcharge are placed in escrow. However, it’s clear from the opinion that the other 300 fee increases aren’t Kosher.

“The court’s decision sends a clear message to our state lawmakers that it is unreasonable – and unconstitutional – to discriminate among fee payers and specifically burden one group, in this case businesses and employers, with providing funds for general purposes,” said Douglas L. Whitley, president and CEO of the Illinois Chamber.

“The court’s decision addresses the fundamental distinction between fees and taxes,” added Whitley. “If the General Assembly decides it needs additional funds for general purposes, it should be up front about it and enact a tax increase.”

“Our hope is that this well-reasoned decision will prevent lawmakers – in Illinois and across the nation – from abusing their power by using excessive fee increases to supplement general revenue funds, which should be generated by taxes paid by all taxpayers,” he said.

“By drawing this distinction, the court is saying that state government does not have unlimited power to impose fees. State government does not have a blank check to discriminate against a certain class of fee payers to solve its fiscal problems,” Whitley said.

A story in Crain’s about the judge’s ruling is here.

posted by Rich Miller
Tuesday, Nov 30, 04 @ 2:11 pm

Comments

1. The Crains article keeps referring to the Industrial Commission as handling “unemployment” claims. It actually handles work injury claims, which is a different thing completely.

   I still remain amused that no one in the press has picked up on the Blagojevich administration claims that there is no real difference between a tax increase and a fee increase in their arguments before the Court.

   Comment by Louis G. Atsaves Tuesday, Nov 30, 04 @ 4:06 pm

Add a comment

Sorry, comments are closed at this time.

Previous Post: Fee hike decision
Next Post: Blogroll additions

Last 10 posts:

• Isabel’s afternoon roundup (11-21)
• HGOPs whacked for opposing lame duck session (11-21)
• Uber’s Local Partnership = Stress-Free Travel For Paratransit Riders (11-21)
• Report: IDOC's prison drug test found to be 'wrong 91 percent of the time' (11-21)
• SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Session update (Updated x2) (11-21)
• Illinois Supreme Court rules state SLAPP law doesn't automatically protect traditional journalism (Updated) (11-21)
• ‘This is how I reward my good soldiers’: Madigan ally testifies he was rewarded with do-nothing consulting contract (11-21)
• Illinois Supreme Court rules that Jussie Smollett's second prosecution 'is a due process violation, and we therefore reverse defendant’s conviction' (11-21)
• Dignity In Pay (HB 793): It Is Time To Ensure Fair Pay For Illinoisans With Disabilities (11-21)
• It’s just a bill (Updated) (11-21)

more Posts (Archives)

WordPress Mobile Edition available at alexking.org.

powered by WordPress.