Latest Post | Last 10 Posts | Archives
Previous Post: SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today’s edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)
Next Post: The Democratic primary will proceed… sorta
Posted in:
* Bernie Schoenburg interviewed Bruce Rauner about clouting his kid into Payton Prep back in September. Bernie asked if Rauner called then CEO of Chicago Public Schools Arne Duncan about his suburban daughter’s application to the Chicago public school…
Bernie: Did you talk to Mr. Duncan about it?
Rauner: I did not.
Bernie: And, did you leave a message for him?
Rauner: [Laughs.] Bernie, I told you the facts.
* From Bernie’s column today…
Well, that’s not what was being reported in various media outlets this week. Rauner did a round of interviews, including talking to ABC, NBC and CBS stations in Chicago, to explain himself on Monday — the day that Sun-Times story hit the streets. All three stations reported that Rauner called Duncan.
Jay Levine of CBS-Channel 2 said in his story: “Rauner admits making a call to Arne Duncan to get his daughter into Payton despite what he calls her middle school attendance record marred by illness.” […]
Mary Ann Ahern, in her story on NBC-Channel 5, said: “Bruce Rauner says yes, he made a phone call to then-Superintendent of Schools Arne Duncan, so his daughter, moving into the city from Winnetka, could get into Walter Payton College Prep.” […]
And CHARLES THOMAS of ABC-Channel 7 reported: “When his daughter’s application was rejected, Rauner admitted calling then-CPS CEO Arne Duncan to get her admitted to Payton, which had a waiting list of over 7,000 city teenagers.” […]
Rauner spokesman MIKE SCHRIMPF said this week that when Rauner told me in September he hadn’t talked with Duncan, it was because of how Rauner interpreted my query.
“They didn’t ask for him to put her into the school,” Schrimpf said of Rauner and his wife, Diana, “which I think is what the thrust of your question was.”
Um, no, that’s not what Bernie asked.
* Meanwhile, Greg Hinz wants some answers from Rauner about Stu Levine, but the campaign won’t talk…
How can Mr. Rauner be trusted to clean up corrupt Springfield when he won’t fully explain how and why Mr. Levine made $25,000 a month trying to get government business for a company owned in part by Mr. Rauner?
As I reported last March, Mr. Rauner made his fortune as a principal in GTCR LLC, the big Chicago private-equity business. In fact, as my colleague Lynne Marek later reported, Mr. Rauner was the key “people person” in the firm, the guy who made the calls to potential clients trying to sign them up. And many of those big clients were pension funds, like the giant Teachers Retirement System of Illinois, which covers just about every public-school teacher in the state outside of Chicago.
That’s why my eyebrows went up when I discovered that in 2003, TRS initially turned down a request from GTCR to handle $50 million in its pension investments. The decision was reversed at the next TRS meeting, after Mr. Rauner personally showed up to make a pitch. And among those who voted to give the firm the $50 million was TRS board member Mr. Levine, whose legal problems hadn’t surfaced yet but who had objected at the first meeting to GTCR’s request.
Nowhere in the minutes of those meetings — and I’ve checked them for both the February 2003 meeting and for the May 2003 meeting — is a pretty pertinent fact disclosed: Mr. Levine at the time was getting $25,000 a month from a medical-bill processing company named CompBenefits that, a few years earlier, had been acquired by GTCR and three other investment companies. In other words, Mr. Rauner was seeking a favor from a guy whose bread was being very well-buttered, in part, by Mr. Rauner’s company.
* Rauner does, indeed, need to answer for this. But I checked with TRS executive director Jon Bauman about his recollections of those two meetings. Rauner claims he’s never met Levine, so I wanted to know if there was any interaction between the two men. His e-mailed reply…
They were both present at the meeting in May 2003 when GTCR got a do-over following a bad presentation at the prior meeting (I think Feb. 2003.) At that meeting, one of Rauner’s partners, a guy named Dave Donnini, showed up solo. We always encouraged money managers presenting to the Board to bring two people in case one screws up, has a bad day, or whatever. They didn’t, the presentation didn’t go well, and both Levine and John Glennon really bashed this guy’s head in. The Board almost voted it down but on the recommendation of the outside investment consultant, postponed action.
In May, Rauner came in with maybe 3 other guys and a clearly well-polished presentation. I don’t recall any controversy and few questions and the Board unanimously voted to approve the Fund.
To the Question, I don’t remember them interacting beyond a handshake or the like at that second meeting. I can tell you unequivocally that Levine never said anything to me about Rauner. He said he objected the first time because the guy was so bad and acted like the Board was a rubber stamp, in so many words.
So, maybe there’s not much “there” there, but Rauner still needs to answer questions.
* And speaking of stuff to answer for, the Illinois media has completely missed this Wall Street Journal story from last month…
Trading units of ConvergEx Group, a brokerage firm for big investors, agreed to pay more than $107 million to settle charges brought by U.S. authorities related to overcharging customers when the firm carried out their trades.
The units also agreed to admit wrongdoing, as did former employees Jonathan Daspin and Thomas Lekargeren.
Additionally, the U.S. Justice Department announced criminal charges against Messrs. Daspin and Lekargeren as well as ConvergeEx Group and a brokerage subsidiary. ConvergEx agreed to pay $43.8 million in penalties and restitution to settle those charges.
The Securities and Exchange Commission, which charged the firm with fraud, said the firms used a system that made customers “unknowingly pay more than double what they understood they were paying to have their orders executed.”
In a statement, ConvergEx said the employees were no longer with the company and that the Bermuda trading desk at the center of the alleged fraud has been shut down, while the activity in question was discontinued two years ago. […]
ConvergEx has faced volatility on other fronts, too. In 2011, a deal to sell itself to CVC Capital Partners, a private-equity firm, fell apart. The next year it managed to sell its Eze Castle Software and RealTick businesses to TPG Capital, another private-equity company, in a deal valued at $1.9 billion. In June it withdrew plans to issue stock to the public but didn’t comment on its decision.
* So how does this matter? Well, that 2011 deal which fell apart was announced thusly…
GTCR, a leading private equity firm, today announced it has entered into a definitive agreement to sell its portfolio company, ConvergEx Group (“ConvergEx”), to funds advised by CVC Capital Partners (“CVC”). The transaction is an all cash transaction expected to close in the fall following receipt of financing and customary regulatory approvals. ConvergEx is a leading technology company offering software products and technology-enabled services to hedge funds, traditional asset managers, broker-dealers, corporations and plan sponsors. […]
“I’d like to thank GTCR for their unwavering support in helping ConvergEx become an industry-leading company. They have been a true partner,” said Mr. Velli. “We have had a fantastic period of growth with GTCR and look forward to working with CVC as we continue to execute our growth strategy and build out our capabilities to provide unique technologies that today’s marketplace requires.”
GTCR is, of course, Rauner’s firm.
* Also, last summer a Chicago trading company of which Rauner is a partner settled with the Securities and Exchange Commission and agreed to cease and desist illegal trading practices. Peak6 paid $60,000 in fines to the SEC.
Last May, a firm in GTCR’s portfolio agreed to pay $15.75 million to terminate a federal probe…
Sorenson Communications, an Internet-based Telecommunications Relay Service (TRS) provider, has agreed to pay $15.75 million to settle an investigation by the Federal Communications Commission’s Enforcement Bureau into whether the company billed the TRS Fund for calls made by unregistered, unverified, or ineligible individuals, and for calls that were made by or on behalf of the provider itself.
In case you aren’t aware of it, the Telecommunications Relay Service provides services to people who are deaf, hard of hearing, deaf-blind, or who have a speech disability to communicate via the telephone.
Not cool at all.
* Also from Greg today…
Stung by a fortnight of miserable headlines, GOP gubernatorial hopeful Bruce Rauner is calling in some major media-relations reinforcements.
Joining Mr. Rauner’s communications shop effective next week will be Lance Trover, a longtime veteran of Illinois politics who most recently has worked for U.S. Sen. Mark Kirk, R-Ill., the state’s ranking Republican.
In a brief heads-up phone call late yesterday, Mr. Trover wouldn’t say much but insisted that his “leave of absence” to work for Mr. Rauner is not an indication of where Mr. Kirk stands. “The senator has made it clear he’s not endorsing” in the race among Mr. Rauner, Illinois Treasurer Dan Rutherford and state Sens. Bill Brady and Kirk Dillard, he said.
Trover would be the second Mark Kirk staffer to join the campaign. This is no coincidence.
posted by Rich Miller
Thursday, Jan 16, 14 @ 9:58 am
Sorry, comments are closed at this time.
Previous Post: SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today’s edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)
Next Post: The Democratic primary will proceed… sorta
WordPress Mobile Edition available at alexking.org.
powered by WordPress.
“He will be attractive! He’ll be nice and helpful. He’ll get a job where he influences a great God-fearing Illinois. He’ll never do an evil thing! He’ll never deliberately hurt a living thing… he will just bit by little bit lower our standards where they are important. Just a tiny little bit. Just coax along flash over substance. Just a tiny little bit. And he’ll talk about all of this, and really being ’salesman’…and he’ll buy all the great Carhartts and $18 dollar watches.”
Comment by Oswego Willy Thursday, Jan 16, 14 @ 10:05 am
Come on! Who ever calls rich guys on the carpet? Rauner can do whatever he wants in this world (or our state) because he can buy it all. I gave up on believing in morality and ethics a long time ago. And those who support him and defend him are just like him.
Comment by AnonymousOne Thursday, Jan 16, 14 @ 10:08 am
Lots of smoke … could be a fire is starting to build.
Comment by RNUG Thursday, Jan 16, 14 @ 10:09 am
Why does this NOT surprise me?
Comment by DuPage Thursday, Jan 16, 14 @ 10:15 am
Rauner’s answer is to:
1) Throw in more millions to the campaign;
2) Hire more flacks to provide misinformation;
3) Make new ads showing how compassionate he is.
Comment by Norseman Thursday, Jan 16, 14 @ 10:19 am
Where I come from, politicians from the city get in trouble for secretly sending their kids to suburban schools - not the other way around.
Comment by Roland Deschain Thursday, Jan 16, 14 @ 10:19 am
Smart people who “forget”, “misremember”, “misinterpret”, and possibly mislead…
They are the type to wear brand new Carhartts, while talking about lowering the minimum wage got those who need to wear Carhartt coats to work for a living..,
They are the type to handle Billions of dollars, and laugh off $200K after a Clouting as “Baloney”
They are the type who refuse to seem as am insider, while blaming others for doing less than they, and see no irony in it.
“Bruce Rauner” is not Bruce Rauner.
“You lied to me Eddie.” Said Smitty, the reporter Eddie Cicotte lied to, when asked a direct question.
Reporters hate to be lied to, like anyone, but funny thing, reporters have a platform to complain, and people to tell and want to know.
Comment by Oswego Willy Thursday, Jan 16, 14 @ 10:19 am
Rauner clearly lied to Bernie. He knew he was lying. He had no problem lying.
This all just more ammo for the “well at least he’s not a crook” Governor Quinn to use against Rauner.
Comment by LittleLebowskiUrbanAchiever Thursday, Jan 16, 14 @ 10:20 am
Rauner wanted to get his hands on the TRS funds, but now that teachers’ defined pensions are useful to him politically, to bash them, he’s against defined pensions.
That’s what the Fahner types do, they get their hands on government business and then attack government workers and unions because it suits their political agenda.
Comment by Grandson of Man Thursday, Jan 16, 14 @ 10:21 am
Does Rauner have a learning disability? He’d have you believe he has difficulty understanding simple, direct questions — even when they’re presented in writing ahead of time, in the case of minimum wage.
Rauner flat-out lied to Bernie. Schrimpf’s spin is pathetic.
Can Stu Levine have visitors at Club Fed? Might be worth a trip for an enterprising reporter.
Comment by wordslinger Thursday, Jan 16, 14 @ 10:23 am
Is Bernie typing on a typewriter in the background?
Comment by Empty Chair Thursday, Jan 16, 14 @ 10:25 am
Watching this campaign is like watching a very expensive train wreck. He might win the nomination but will get slaughtered in the GE.
Comment by Stones Thursday, Jan 16, 14 @ 10:25 am
As a former educator, it was the bright kids who cheated, not the low kids. Wonder where they get that from?
Comment by AnonymousOne Thursday, Jan 16, 14 @ 10:28 am
Payton Prep is the Prism.
All the transgressions are found there;
Lying, Cheating others, deception, misdirection, Democratic Clouting Connections (for the Primary, the General? ‘An insider’s Insider), big money, Chicago teachers, schools - charter and Chicago Public. Unions…
Payton Prep is the prism, will light shine through?
Comment by Oswego Willy Thursday, Jan 16, 14 @ 10:30 am
Rauner thought he could use his money to control the message. He’s probably stunned it doesn’t work that way. Now, he’s turning to the pros.
Comment by Wensicia Thursday, Jan 16, 14 @ 10:31 am
Just reading the tweets from @natashakorecki, @DHstatehouse, and @MaryAnnAhernNBC it sounds like Bruce didn’t have very good answes to these questions at this morning’s forum.
“This has been a little bit of beat-up Brucey morning”
Brucey?
Comment by hisgirlfriday Thursday, Jan 16, 14 @ 10:37 am
===Can Stu Levine have visitors at Club Fed?===
I was wondering the same thing.
Comment by 47th Ward Thursday, Jan 16, 14 @ 10:37 am
I wonder if Quinn will have to answer to any of this considering he was a statewide office holder at the time.
Comment by Northbroke Thursday, Jan 16, 14 @ 10:40 am
- wordslinger - & - 47th Ward -,
I like the way you guys think, but will a reporter go?
Like a reporter who was blatantly lied to, to his face, and the Flack is unapologetic, bordering snarky to the question, and not the answer.
I would like to see/read that interview…honest.
Good on you guys, great thought.
Comment by Oswego Willy Thursday, Jan 16, 14 @ 10:43 am
Next the story will be the principal at Payton kidnapped the Rauner girl and forced her to attend his school.
Comment by Chavez-respecting Obamist Thursday, Jan 16, 14 @ 10:43 am
I read one time, “Do not equate money with success. What counts most about success is how it is obtained.” I would add: “and how it is used”. It is one thing for a Bill Gates to create something that changes the world and receives a windfall for doing so when his company goes public, but I submit it is very different when someone amasses great wealth one deal at a time and many which involve questionable methods and individuals. Levine, Rendell, Emanauel, Daley etc. My point being: When is enough - enough?? Does anyone think that the average voter in Illinois can relate to someone who didn’t stop at $100 million - or 200 million or even 500 million and say, “it’s time to give back or to get involved in public service”?? Can they relate to someone who didn’t stop when they had 2 homes - or 3 or even EIGHT, but had to have a NINTH before they took a break and decided they cared about Illinois?? It’s ironic that Springfield is also the fictional home town of the Simpsons, because Rauner makes Mr. Burns seem like a piker. The saddest cut of all for Republicans is that he will drag the ticket down in the general election when he gets creamed by the populist Quinn.
Comment by veritas Thursday, Jan 16, 14 @ 10:44 am
- Northbroke -,
You forgot the Rauner talking points for today;
See HQ before posting again. Thanks.
Comment by Oswego Willy Thursday, Jan 16, 14 @ 10:44 am
Stuart is up in Duluth for another three years. It’s cold and dreary up there this time of year. I’m sure a visit from a reporter would brighten his day.
Comment by Snucka Thursday, Jan 16, 14 @ 10:47 am
This post just made my day. Money can’t buy political savvy, or even 7th grade level common sense.
Comment by Former Merit Comp Slave Thursday, Jan 16, 14 @ 10:47 am
Gotta love it FarmerBrucey lies to Bernie
Bauman cant remember ….don’t forget he had forgotten everything until the G knocked on his door and he wet himself
FarmerBrucey’s runs/owns/profits from a bunch of firms paying big time fines…like a mini JP Morgan Chase
Too bad no asked about this stuff at the debate
Comment by CircularFiringSquad Thursday, Jan 16, 14 @ 10:48 am
Kirk’s team have been masters for years of making any real problems appear trivial. Not denied, but not worth troubling yourselves about.
It will be interesting watching the Teflon Team at work.
Comment by walker Thursday, Jan 16, 14 @ 10:51 am
–I wonder if Quinn will have to answer to any of this considering he was a statewide office holder at the time.—
LOL, which of Rauner’s actions do you think Quinn needs to answer for?
These Raunerbots are trippy.
Comment by wordslinger Thursday, Jan 16, 14 @ 10:52 am
Amnesia is contagious in this state
Comment by Northbroke Thursday, Jan 16, 14 @ 10:53 am
@Northbroke
“I wonder if Quinn will have to answer to any of this considering he was a statewide office holder at the time.”
Yes, Quinn certainly has a lot to answer for. There was also some really bad weather under his watch. Not to mention — I bought some cheese at Whole Foods, and when I opened it, it was moldy! What do I pay taxes for, amirite?
Comment by Soccermom Thursday, Jan 16, 14 @ 10:53 am
Rauner has a very small window of opportunity to clear this up, if it is even possible. Given the stuff in this post it looks beyond impossible. The GOP in Illinois can only hope the damage done can be gotten past quickly so that a viable candidate can beat Rauner in the primary.
Treasurer Rutherford, please take note.
Comment by dupage dan Thursday, Jan 16, 14 @ 10:56 am
I’m Casey Kasem and the hits keep on coming…
Comment by PoolGuy Thursday, Jan 16, 14 @ 10:57 am
OswegoWilly-
Do you pay Rich’s $500 to be allowed to speak to people that way? Relax.
Comment by Northbroke Thursday, Jan 16, 14 @ 10:59 am
Have you ever been to the purple hotel?
Comment by bruce is not the boss Thursday, Jan 16, 14 @ 11:00 am
@Northbroke:
The memories on this blog are long, will-informed, and deep. Please specify what you’re talking about, or don’t waste our time.
Comment by walker Thursday, Jan 16, 14 @ 11:01 am
- Northbroke -,
Nah, usually it’s in unmarked, non-sequential, cannoli…
I am quite relaxed, thanks, you? lol
Comment by Oswego Willy Thursday, Jan 16, 14 @ 11:02 am
Bruce Rauner must take lessons from Chris Christie on how to answer tough questions.
Bernie: And, did you leave a message for him?
Rauner: [Laughs.] Bernie, I told you the facts.
TRANSLATION: Yeah, I left a message, but I don’t want to publicly admit it.
Just like Chris Christie’s famous response to what he knew about the bridge closings.
“Unbeknownst to everybody, I was actually the guy out there — I was in overalls and a hat — but I actually was the guy working the cones out there”
TRANSLATION: I’m not denying it at all, I was fully involved.
Comment by Say It Ain't So! Thursday, Jan 16, 14 @ 11:03 am
@ Empty Chair 10:25 === Is Bernie typing on a typewriter in the background? ===
Probably. It’s standard newspapering practice to type your notes during a phone interview. It’s faster, and the notes are more legible.
Comment by olddog Thursday, Jan 16, 14 @ 11:04 am
Has anyone asked who gave him arne duncan’s phone number?
Comment by all i want to know Thursday, Jan 16, 14 @ 11:10 am
Say it Ain’t So:
Actually, Rauner said on WLS this week that he did in fact speak with Arne personally. Not through an intermediary or a voice mail.
Comment by Snucka Thursday, Jan 16, 14 @ 11:16 am
Springfield insiders- Good luck with all that.
Comment by Driveby Thursday, Jan 16, 14 @ 11:18 am
@Northbroke:
Perhaps you can explain what exactly Quinn has to answer for as it relates to this topic? If you have information he was involved in any way please share it with us. Otherwise your insinuation that he needs to answer for anything just because he was, what, Lt. Governor, is laughable.
Comment by Demoralized Thursday, Jan 16, 14 @ 11:19 am
I thought Lance Trover left Kirk’s staff. Isn’t that what the going away party was for the night before Kirk suffered a stroke?
Comment by Anonymous Thursday, Jan 16, 14 @ 11:35 am
Rauner is taking heat over this, and rightfully so. But when will St. Arne get his turn in the spotlight? It took more than one person to clout Rauner’s kid into Payton.
Comment by Independent Thursday, Jan 16, 14 @ 11:44 am
The veting process take time. This is why you need to really examin and get past a persons image that they are trying to present. The hipochracy is on display.
Comment by facts are stubborn things Thursday, Jan 16, 14 @ 11:45 am
Were there any companies owned by GTCR that were run legally and did not have to pay fines to settle regulatory investigations?
just wondering…
Comment by northshore cynic Thursday, Jan 16, 14 @ 11:49 am
===when will St. Arne get his turn in the spotlight?===
When he runs for Governor and declares war on political insiders (clouters).
Comment by Endangered Moderate Species Thursday, Jan 16, 14 @ 11:51 am
- EMS -,
Beat me to it, lol
Comment by Oswego Willy Thursday, Jan 16, 14 @ 11:52 am
Oswego Willy
[Channeling yesterday’s Easter Egg …]
Where are you picking up Rich’s cannoli? Any other interesting items laying about there?
Comment by Anyone Remember Thursday, Jan 16, 14 @ 11:59 am
==Kirk’s team have been masters for years of making any real problems appear trivial.== walker
“Kirk’s team”? You mean Chicago Tribune and the rest of the corporate media?
Comment by Carl Nyberg Thursday, Jan 16, 14 @ 12:03 pm
===Were there any companies owned by GTCR that were run legally and did not have to pay fines to settle regulatory investigations?===
Raunerbots are getting a little goofy today.
I’m sure Rod Blagojevich took some clean campaign money. Does that make everything else OK? Not comparing RRB to Rauner, understand, just pointing out how idiotic your comment was.
Comment by Rich Miller Thursday, Jan 16, 14 @ 12:05 pm
Willy, since I’ve never been a political staffer, consultant, advisor, operative, etc. maybe you can explain why a staffer would leave, come back, and then get reassigned that way. (As you were so good at explaining what “paid volunteers” are.)
I know that Kirk’s team have a reputation for being a bit aggressive (even when it’s not called for) so it must be a tough team to work on. However, aside from that, why would people move around that way?
Comment by Anonymous Thursday, Jan 16, 14 @ 12:06 pm
The second time in two weeks he has tripped himself up by not keeping a straight story.
What’s next?
Comment by Formerly Known As... Thursday, Jan 16, 14 @ 12:10 pm
And, BTW, I think it’s great that Rauner is picking up more of Kirk’s staffers. If it goes like any of Kirk’s campaigns, any volunteers Rauner has should be dropping like flies soon, meaning they’ll head toward helping one of the others with renewed passion and vigor.
Comment by Anonymous Thursday, Jan 16, 14 @ 12:10 pm
It’s still early, and the Easter Eggs need to be found, not pointed out, even with a gun left in a car lol.
It’s something Broadcast News might pick up…
- Anonymous - ya mocking or asking or what? lol
Comment by Oswego Willy Thursday, Jan 16, 14 @ 12:11 pm
I’m truly asking. I don’t see how aligning himself with Kirk helps–especially during a Primary.
Comment by Anonymous Thursday, Jan 16, 14 @ 12:15 pm
Oswego Willy
Asking.
I can be sarcastic / mocking, but try not to here about serious commenters here. Professional courtesy.
Comment by Anyone Remember Thursday, Jan 16, 14 @ 12:17 pm
The Rauner deal that needs to be investigated is the forced sale of SBC subsidiary Security Link. The cast of characters are like chess pieces as they move around the board on this deal: SBC’s Chairman was Bill Daley, who would later become Obama’s Chief of Staff. Rahm Emanuel who had been Obama’s Chief of Staff would become an Investment Banker at the urging of Bruce Rauner and would later replace Bill Daley’s brother Richie as Mayor. Emanuel represented GTCR (R for Rauner) on the deal in which GTCR put up only $100 million of the $479 million purchase price, with Daley’s company financing the balance. GTCR then flipped the company for ONE BILLION DOLLARS - MONTHS later!! Rahm pocketed $16 million and GTCR approx. $500 MILLION!! The NY Times link to the story is: http:www.nytimes.com/2008/12/04/us/politics/04emanuel.html?
Just your average deal that Illinois voters can relate to. Rauner’s done pretty well for an “outsider” running with Bill Daley & Rahm Emanuel. he didn’t even need Stuart Levine on this one!!
Comment by veritas Thursday, Jan 16, 14 @ 12:22 pm
Did Rauner think he could pull one over on Bernie? Did he think Bernie would play along with his lies? What was Rauner thinking!
Comment by Cheswick Thursday, Jan 16, 14 @ 12:24 pm
- Anyone Remember -
My first Post here is telling…
- Anonymous -,
The question is why?
Money, the “Crew”, if you like working with them… The money, the opportunity to work on a statewide campaign right now … The money, same neck of the nape, neck of the woods, kinda organization.
I also bet money might be a factor.
I can’t speak to the travel habits of one Lance Trover. Is that what you called me here for today, “telephone records and foot lockers.”
Honestly, no real, honest answer why.
Comment by Oswego Willy Thursday, Jan 16, 14 @ 12:25 pm
Well then, this will in fact be the most interesting race I’ve ever followed in Illinois. Mr. Rauner’s approach worked when Kirk used it, and I’ve always hoped that that was an anomaly. I guess we’ll soon find out whether money and disinformation or confidence in one’s capabilities and hence, clarity in messaging matter most in our elections.
Comment by Anonymous Thursday, Jan 16, 14 @ 12:52 pm
- Anonymous -,
With respect,
Rich is far better than I connecting dots from Kirk to Rauner, and has done so with really good insight. It’s out there. You want to connect dots, grab a pen, I won’t stop you, and Rich has looked at it too, same with Cross and Rauner “money types” too.
It’s not that Lance is going that is telling, it’s more that Rauner thinks he may need more Flacks, and from the Kirk stable, that is what is telling.
Comment by Oswego Willy Thursday, Jan 16, 14 @ 12:58 pm
- Anyone Remember -
Find any Easter Eggs yet. Left 3-4 here.
Comment by Oswego Willy Thursday, Jan 16, 14 @ 1:10 pm
@Willy -
I like the Payton Prep story. it is good. its important.
but to Mr Rauner’s opponents, I suggest this:
“I agree with Mr. Rauner that we need to run state government more like a business. The problem is that Mr. Rauner runs his business like Rod Blagojevich ran state government.”
Then just run through the list.
Lest we forget, Rod was just “doing what any husband would do” when he was using his clout to land a fat paycheck for his wife.
Comment by Juvenal Thursday, Jan 16, 14 @ 1:22 pm
My only point above is not about the Tribbies or “corporate media”, but rather that Kirk’s communications team has been masterful in the past in handling/evading problems.
Rauner’s simply hiring experience and competence. They are simply adding to their resumes and bank accounts.
Comment by walker Thursday, Jan 16, 14 @ 1:27 pm
- Juvenal -,
You get it…
It’s all about continuing the narrative. Payton Prep is one of a half dozen instances “Bruce Rauner” has proven himself unacceptable, including your great post.
Add, continuing to add, and you understand that.
We are together, I am not blinded by one, but using one to build the many upon.
Comment by Oswego Willy Thursday, Jan 16, 14 @ 1:51 pm
Would like to know why Rauner returned all donations from Peak6 and its principals.
Comment by Huh? Thursday, Jan 16, 14 @ 2:07 pm
Brady, Dillard, Rauner Crews;
Keep your heads up, ok.
Do your jobs. My last Post was for all you guys.
Keep pluggin’.
Comment by Oswego Willy Thursday, Jan 16, 14 @ 2:31 pm
My last post was for all the Crew working for the “3″;
Keep your heads up, keep plugging.
Comment by Oswego Willy Thursday, Jan 16, 14 @ 2:35 pm
Speaking of Rauner and education issues, here’s something worth checking out in Diane Ravich’s blog. In a post headlined “Candidate Rauner in Illinois Supports Charters & Lower Minimum Wage” (Jan. 16), she says:
http://dianeravitch.net/2014/01/16/candidate-rauner-in-illinois-supports-charters-lower-minimum-wage/
Comment by olddog Thursday, Jan 16, 14 @ 2:40 pm
This guy is dirty…..I can smell him while standing in my cattle barn. I beg you Cook and collar Counties…do not elect this jerk.
Comment by anon Thursday, Jan 16, 14 @ 2:45 pm
==Rauner is taking heat over this, and rightfully so. But when will St. Arne get his turn in the spotlight? It took more than one person to clout Rauner’s kid into Payton.==
I think the principal at Payton from then is retired, so if they talked it would be helpful. While I would also like to hear Arne Duncan’s side of the story, it might be more effective for GOP opponents of Rauner to say something like “Bruce Rauner had Obama Education Secretary Arne Duncan clout his kid into school.” Emphasize the Obama part, obviously, in a GOP primary.
Comment by Precinct Captain Thursday, Jan 16, 14 @ 3:04 pm
- Precinct Captain -,
Yep, even go as far to say…
“a Rich Daley appointee, and Obama Cabinet member clouted Rauner’s Daughter”
Rich Daley, Rahm Emanuel, Barak Obama play real well in the GOP Primary.
Buzz words, Rauner knows buzz words.
Comment by Oswego Willy Thursday, Jan 16, 14 @ 3:07 pm
Unfortunately, the three amigos do not have enough money to spend on an offense. Rauner’s money can bury these guys once he feels desperate and goes all-in negative.
Their best strategy (other than raising lots of cash) is to gamble that the PACS will do serious damage to Rauner, take their own shots at Rauner during the debates and save their money so that they can fill the air waves in those last couple of weeks.
Comment by Endangered Moderate Species Thursday, Jan 16, 14 @ 3:23 pm
“This was not a taped conversation. I am paraphrasing. But the gist and the meaning are accurate.”
“I think the principal at Payton from then is retired, so if they talked it would be helpful. While I would also like to hear Arne Duncan’s side of the story, it might be more effective for GOP opponents of Rauner to say something like “Bruce Rauner had Obama Education Secretary Arne Duncan clout his kid into school.” Emphasize the Obama part, obviously, in a GOP primary.”
Keep brainstorming, folks….maybe you can eventually find something on Mr Rauner so maybe there still will be a chance everything can stay the same in Springfield.
Keep trying hard to take someone down, try to create a scandal rather than just debate Rauner on the issues.
Comment by medium rare Thursday, Jan 16, 14 @ 4:05 pm
===debate Rauner on the issues.===
MR- Be careful what you wish for. Rauner hasn’t exactly hit pay dirt when debating the issues (minimum wage, insider politics, etc.). His strength is burying his opponents with ad buys that stay with his talking points.
The best debates he has had so far have been with himself. Flippant is not a good characteristic of a serious debater.
Comment by Endangered Moderate Species Thursday, Jan 16, 14 @ 4:31 pm
@ medium rare === … try to create a scandal rather than just debate Rauner on the issues ===
Education *is* an issue. The part of Diane Ravich’s blog you didn’t bother to quote was a debate on that issue. If you were really earning your $7.25 an hour, you’d know people have been debating Rauner on education issues since he bought his way into the charter school racket in 2009.
Comment by olddog Thursday, Jan 16, 14 @ 5:04 pm
EMS-
Well said.
Bruce Rauner is not prepared to have a debate on the issues.
When asked what he would do to turn state government around, his answer was that he would create a panel of 30 business leaders to make recommendations.
I guess he has never heard of the Illinois Chamber of Commerce.
Calling him a policy lightweight is an overstatement. His staff must tether him to the stage for debates to keep him from floating off like the Hindenburg.
As others have noted, if he hadnt made himself so rich through his insider dealings, we wouldnt even be discussing him as a candidate.
Comment by Juvenal Thursday, Jan 16, 14 @ 5:16 pm
Indee, Rauner DOES have to answer for it, and the Media and General Populace should NOT stop asking him about it until he comes TOtally clean!–Because all we’ve gotten from him so far on it is a lot of gobbledygook, flip-floppin’ hyPOCrisy! Once and for all, Rauner, did you, in FACT, call Mr. Duncan to ask for him to find a way to get your child in or not? If you did, be a real man, and just take the hit already. Because Illinois voters may SEEM so at times, but we are NOT, in fact, stupid, and if you stay wishy-washy about this subject much longer, it might happen in March, or it might happen in November, but mark my words–you will pay for it with Defeat, and THAT’S an outcome I don’t think you are spending SEVeral MILlion dollar$ of your OWN money to end-up with. But you’d better be straight up with us, or the Voters will see to it that you put on your fake Carhartt vest one final time–and take a Hike, for GOOD…!
Comment by Just The Way It Is One Thursday, Jan 16, 14 @ 8:58 pm
That was meant to begin above: “Indeed,…!”
Comment by Just The Way It Is One Thursday, Jan 16, 14 @ 8:59 pm
I had listened to both Rauner on Roe saying that he called and today’s report about what was on Capital Fax.
The one thing that was certainly missed by Roe, and not mentioned here is Rauner’s statement at the end of the audio that his primary residence is in Winnetka. If that’s the case, his girl had no right to attend CPS, even if he has a secondary condo in Chicago. Also, not explained is why she just had to attend Payton instead of New Trier.
Comment by RoeListnerJack Friday, Jan 17, 14 @ 4:21 pm