Capitol Fax.com - Your Illinois News Radar

Question of the day

Posted in:

Illinois

* This group is was [he resigned from the board last year] backed by Democratic gubernatorial hopeful Chris Kennedy…

* The Question: Effective or not? Take the poll and then explain your answer in comments, please.

survey hosting

posted by Rich Miller
Monday, Jan 23, 17 @ 11:22 am

Comments

I voted no in terms of this single ad. The building thing doesn’t work. But there’s some mileage out of tying Rauner to Trump.

Comment by Arsenal Monday, Jan 23, 17 @ 11:26 am
I think the days of Rauner running away from Trump are over. Not that Rauner won’t still work hard to run far, far away from the President, just that the President’s similarities with Rauner are too big to ignore anymore.

Before Sean Spicer was offering alternative facts, Rauner was telling whoppers to the Illinois press corps. If and when the national news media discover their spine, so too should those covering our state government (present company excluded of course).

Rauner can run, but he can’t hide anymore. A billionaire businessman with no experience and only a passing relationship with the truth? Who does that describe?

Exactly.

Comment by 47th Ward Monday, Jan 23, 17 @ 11:27 am
Actually, Rauner’s name would work better on the Thompson Center. I’m surprised he hasn’t added it already.

re: alternative facts

Trump should thank Rauner. Rauner perfected the “perpetual campaign” and does very well with “alternative facts”. Trump’s MO and Rauner’s are nearly identical when it comes to misleading or attempting to redirect the press.

Comment by Bobby Catalpa Monday, Jan 23, 17 @ 11:29 am
Effective for what they are trying to achieve, likes for their page.

Comment by Lil Lewbowski Urban Achiever Monday, Jan 23, 17 @ 11:31 am
Nominating a billionaire (JB) or a Kennedy could takeaway a lot of the messaging from Dems. They’d have their own plutocrat… and it’s possible Rauner would be the poorer (and only self-made) candidate.

Comment by FRA Monday, Jan 23, 17 @ 11:31 am
Voted “Non-effective”

“Why?”

They are going to get the anti-Trump voters by working to ensure they vote Democratic beyond the primary and vote in the general. It’s more about turnout instead of trying to purposely link Rauner to Trump. That link will occur within the politics of educating voters on real Illinois issues…

Higher Ed
Social Services
Infrastructure.

If anything to link Rauner to Trump, Kennedy, et al, need to get Social Service clients, advocates, and patrons to STOP this “both sides” ridiculousness and have these voters realize it isn’t both sides and Rauner and Trump aren’t there for Social Services.

Now you’d have my attention.

1) Getting Democratic turnout high, Democrats that are engaged in ending Rauner’s destruction.

2) Getting Social Service advocates, clients, and patrons to STOP this “both sides” ridiculousness.

The campaign that can convince Democratic and Social Service voters they want to defeat Rauner, they will get the core voters engaged in their campaigns.

“Trump-Rauner” isn’t as strong as “Bruce Rauner failed”

That’s the ball game, that why I voted as I did.

Comment by Oswego Willy Monday, Jan 23, 17 @ 11:32 am
Voted not effective. My gosh. Somebody ought to let Innovation Illinois that Trump won. Let’s not distract from the awful management the state has been under since Rauner took office.

Comment by Ducky LaMoore Monday, Jan 23, 17 @ 11:33 am
Voted yes. This is low hanging fruit. Democrats in this state would be guilty of political malpractice if they didn’t at least try to tie Rauner to Trump.

Comment by OH Monday, Jan 23, 17 @ 11:36 am
Not effective. Assuming everyone agrees with you is a dicey proposition. As is just calling someone someone else.

Rauner has provided plenty of ammunition to use against him. Everyone knows Trump’s supporters are…enthusiastic, so all a stunt like this does it draws the line between “us” and “them.” “Rauner is bad because Trump is bad and Rauner is Trump” brings who in that isn’t already?

Rauner is Rauner, and he has been an ineffective leader.

Comment by AlfondoGonz Monday, Jan 23, 17 @ 11:41 am
It is hard to link Rauner to Trump when all of the available evidence shows that the two men were not political allies in 2016.

Comment by W Flag Monday, Jan 23, 17 @ 11:42 am
OW

Should have read your post before I posted. Similar thoughts, though yours are better conveyed. Should have gone with “What OW said”

Comment by AlfondoGonz Monday, Jan 23, 17 @ 11:43 am
Tying BigBrain to Trump is always a good use of time and energy especially in a statewide context.

Comment by Annonin' Monday, Jan 23, 17 @ 11:44 am
Ineffective in execution. Concept is fairly good, but the letters need to be GOLD.

Comment by northsider (the original) Monday, Jan 23, 17 @ 11:45 am
=The campaign that can convince Democratic and Social Service voters they want to defeat Rauner, they will get the core voters engaged in their campaigns.=

Agree. This Rauner-Trump stuff does nothing more than fire up the far left and their base.

Most people, whether they like Trump or not, believe he’s a very successful business man. In a normal world, that’s a compliment.

Find a way to engage people in the middle without turning half of them off in the process.

I know a lot of people who voted both ways. Right now the strongest sentiment I get from them on national stuff is “let’s get over it” and “the sun still came up under pres Trump.”

Comment by m Monday, Jan 23, 17 @ 11:47 am
Effective. Consider the 250,000 marchers in Chicago on Saturday. Resistance is strong to ineffective inexperienced Republican leadership.

Comment by anon. Monday, Jan 23, 17 @ 11:47 am
===Tying BigBrain to Trump is always a good use of time and energy especially in a statewide context.===

- Anonnin’ -

No one is stopping the House and Senate Democrats or the Illinois Democratic state party from being engaged in messaging.

Passive messaging isn’t messaging.

Respectfully.

- AlfondoGonz -

No, it’s important that what you are saying, and if others are seeing/saying it too that those thoughts are visible. If anything, glad others are seeing what I’m seeing.

Thanks for the hat tip.

Comment by Oswego Willy Monday, Jan 23, 17 @ 11:51 am
Governor Rauner has driven a wedge between labor and the lack of pension reform and social service providers.

Democrats have sided with labor and left social service providers to fend for themselves

Comment by Lucky Pierre Monday, Jan 23, 17 @ 11:54 am
I think this is pretty effective. It’s simple and direct — something that Dem messaging has been lacking.

Comment by Roman Monday, Jan 23, 17 @ 11:55 am
I voted yes. So many people looking for ways to channel the energy from Saturday into something politically productive. This gives them an initial venue.

The question is whether Innovation Illinois has an actual plan to leverage any new support that comes their way.

Comment by Dance Band on the Titanic Monday, Jan 23, 17 @ 11:56 am
It’s easily countered.

“Yes, Rauner is a Republican. Trump is a Republican. Mike Madigan is a Democrat. Pat Quinn is a Democrat. Rod Blagojevich is a Democrat. Rahm Emanuel is a Democrat. Richard Daley is a Democrat. Illinois was *such* a paradise under them, right? I’m here to talk about *Illinois*, and how to make *Illinois* better, and all they want to try to do is score cheap political points because they’re angry someone has shaken up their stranglehold on power blah blah blah…”

Comment by JB13 Monday, Jan 23, 17 @ 11:59 am
Ineffective, Trump hasn’t been in office long enough to judge his actual ability to do the job, unlike Rauner, who has a proven record of incompetence. I voted against Rauner, but (reluctantly) for Trump;time will tell whether I voted the right way…
Also, as stated above this “us vs. them” attitude is really becoming a pain…

Comment by downstate commissioner Monday, Jan 23, 17 @ 12:00 pm
===Democrats have sided with labor and left social service providers to fend for themselves.===

The “Good Friday Massacre” and Democrats fighting and winning on getting Rauner to realize his “error” (see: caught hurting social services purposely) and getting a change kinda blows your drive-by out of the water.

Comment by Oswego Willy Monday, Jan 23, 17 @ 12:03 pm
Sure, it’s effective at a limited objective of encouraging anti-Trump voters to visit a website to see what’s what.

Linking Trump and Rauner is the biggest no-brainer of all time.

Comment by wordslinger Monday, Jan 23, 17 @ 12:05 pm
–Most people, whether they like Trump or not, believe he’s a very successful business man. In a normal world, that’s a compliment.–

Sorry, A Guy is the unsolicited spokesman for “most people.”

–Find a way to engage people in the middle without turning half of them off in the process.–

Who are the half “in the middle” being “turned off” by linking Trump and Rauner?

Comment by wordslinger Monday, Jan 23, 17 @ 12:11 pm
Yes the “Good Friday Massacre” nonsense again leaving out Cullerton’s awareness of the cuts of course.

Where will the Dems cuts come from? Not labor

Comment by Lucky Pierre Monday, Jan 23, 17 @ 12:11 pm
I said “yes - effective” … Rauner tries to fly under the radar of less involved voters… Rauner has avoided Trump like the plague… they are both classic oligarchs. And that Trump sign right there on the Chicago River is a perfect example how money now equals speech. It’s like the road signs they use to have in Romania that said, “Ceaușescu is Popular” (like in case you forgot)… “alternative facts” when they used to be call propaganda.

Comment by Anonymous Monday, Jan 23, 17 @ 12:13 pm
Not effective. Bruce may have a lot of $$$ but he still markets himself as blue-collar. Keep working on the hit pieces.

Comment by Rocky Rosi Monday, Jan 23, 17 @ 12:14 pm
===Yes the “Good Friday Massacre” nonsense again leaving out Cullerton’s awareness of the cuts of course.===

… and yet, like the CPS Veto, Rauner purposely chose to act, on his own, hurting, with the “Good Friday Massacre” social services, and with CPS Chicago students, as only a Governor can.

Can’t explain away actions only a governor can do.

===Where will the Dems cuts come from? Not labor===

You could ask Leader Radogno, she’s on board with the tax increase too…

Comment by Oswego Willy Monday, Jan 23, 17 @ 12:15 pm
It is fine if you are not a Billionaire also running for office.

Comment by Kyle Hillman Monday, Jan 23, 17 @ 12:23 pm
Might have worked if it had been on the Thompson Center.

Comment by Anonymous Monday, Jan 23, 17 @ 12:25 pm
Yes let’s ask Republican leader Radogno what the Democrats want to cut. Or we could just ask the Democrats. Again they agree cuts are necessary but have been strangely silent about specifics. Wonder why

Comment by Lucky Pierre Monday, Jan 23, 17 @ 12:27 pm
Voted effective- been saying for months Dems better figure out the trolling game that the Rauner crew has been doing rather well.

Comment by DuPage Bard Monday, Jan 23, 17 @ 12:27 pm
This will work only if Trump messes up and messes up badly. Then there may be some traction to the “billionaires behaving like spoiled brats” meme.

Comment by Streator Curmudgeon Monday, Jan 23, 17 @ 12:28 pm
===This will work only if Trump messes up and messes up badly.===

If?

Comment by 47th Ward Monday, Jan 23, 17 @ 12:30 pm
Trump has been underestimated by the establishment and pundits from the beginning of his campaign and it now continues into his administration. Already today MSNBC is calling for him to fire his entire White House staff.

Comment by Lucky Pierre Monday, Jan 23, 17 @ 12:38 pm
Voted “Non-effective.” The animus against Trump appears rooted in his often bizarre conduct and utterances. Comparing Rauner to Trump doesn’t work, at least for me. Rauner is a completely different person facing completely different issues. However, I understand how such an add would appeal to the pols seeking some traction based on class envy.

Comment by Cook County Commoner Monday, Jan 23, 17 @ 12:40 pm
If this were from “Derivative Illinois”, I’d say yes. Innovative? Hardly.

Comment by City Zen Monday, Jan 23, 17 @ 12:40 pm
===Yes let’s ask Republican leader Radogno what the Democrats want to cut. Or we could just ask the Democrats.===

It’s not what is wanted to be cut, it’s what all sides can agree to be cut to pass.

Seriuosly, stop. You are clueless to what needs to happen, you’re arguing to argue.

To bring this back to the Post,

I’m also, from my comment, coming from the premise those anti-Trump aren’t necessarily anti-Rauner, but those hurt by what’s happening in Illinois are the ones needed to be motivated to vote against Rauner, “Bruce Rauner failed”

Connecting Rauner to Trump is the “natural”, it’s getting the Dems, Social Servive patrons, advocates, and clients to the polls to get turnout up to win.

This message we are voting in here is too narrow, by being way too broad-based.

Comment by Oswego Willy Monday, Jan 23, 17 @ 12:40 pm
Lucky Pierre, where are the Republican cuts? where is Rauner’s balanced budget without tax increases? C’mon man. It’s been 2 years now. You are not contributing to the debate at all and meanwhile every single day our state’s finances are getting worse. What was it that Moody’s said a week or so ago — lack of a responsible state budget was the real problem?

Rauner is not a victim in all of this. He is a powerful agent. In fact, Illinois has one of the strongest governorships in the nation. So the real question is, why won’t he govern? after 2 years, the only answer has to be that he wants to have the pain he is causing without owning it up front by proposing budgets with cuts.

Comment by Pawn Monday, Jan 23, 17 @ 12:43 pm
Effective, if you live in Chicago area.

Comment by Hyperbolic Chamber Monday, Jan 23, 17 @ 12:49 pm
um, duh, link Rauner to Trump. heck yes.

Comment by Amalia Monday, Jan 23, 17 @ 12:53 pm
What does Rauner want to cut? Seriously, you haven’t been paying attention. Rauner wants to lower the cost of government while improving the business climate in Illinois.

Rauner’s first budget contained 6 billion in cuts which was rejected by the legislature, who then proposed a budget 4 billion out of balance with no cuts.

He wants to cut the cost of the state workforce through pension reform, salary freezes,increased healthcare costs and outsourcing.

He wants to cut the cost of local government through reducing mandates from Springfield and allowing local control of spending decisions.

He wants to end the decades old practice of borrowing from future taxpayers to pay for today’s spending.

For the past two years Democrats are not for any cuts or any changes to the status quo. Let’s hope they have changed and not just in the Senate.

Comment by Lucky Pierre Monday, Jan 23, 17 @ 12:57 pm
–Trump has been underestimated by the establishment and pundits from the beginning of his campaign and it now continues into his administration.–

That has nothing to do with the question, but it’s appropriate if you’re playtending to be a paid cable TV yakker at pre-school.

In Grown-Up Land, Trump got clobbered by 944,000 votes in Illinois a couple of months ago, receiving less than 40% of the statewide vote.

So, it’s kind of an obvious play to draw on that large anti-Trump sentiment and tie the GOP governor to the GOP president. It would be malpractice not to.

Comment by wordslinger Monday, Jan 23, 17 @ 1:01 pm
===What does Rauner want to cut? Seriously, you haven’t been paying attention. Rauner wants to lower the cost of government while improving the business climate in Illinois===

A budget show that. Rauner has no budget, but you already knew that.

===Rauner’s first budget contained 6 billion in cuts which was rejected by the legislature, who then proposed a budget 4 billion out of balance with no cuts.===

Rauner’s own “budget” was out of balance. Willfully ignorant or… no, willfully ignorant. You are reminded, daily, the same things, and you still, daily peddle your willful ignorance.

The rest of your “talking points” would make sense, if Governor Rauner fulfilled Article VIII, Section 2, (a).

All you’re doing is cutting and pasting talking point last oblivious to the weight and measure of budgetary dollars weighing them by the dollars in that proposed budget.

Rauner is NOT Trump “right now” within the framing of the QOTD, and once Trump gets budgetary measures, he’ll be ahead of Rauner in governing.

Let that sink in.

Comment by Oswego Willy Monday, Jan 23, 17 @ 1:03 pm
Also in “grown up land” every single democrat except Drury in the GA voted to reelect the most unpopular politician in the state to be their leader.

So, it’s kind of an obvious play to draw on that large anti-Madigan sentiment and tie the Dem legislators to Speaker . It would be malpractice not to.

Seems like a much easier comparison than tying Rauner to Trumo when there does not seem to be much in the way to connect the two.

Comment by Lucky Pierre Monday, Jan 23, 17 @ 1:11 pm
Maybe the Governor didn’t support Trump because he knew Trump would get a budget passed before he will?

Comment by DuPage Bard Monday, Jan 23, 17 @ 1:24 pm
Yes, LP, tying Dems to Madigan is an obvious play, as is tying Rauner to Trump.

It’s only the limits of your replicant programming that prevents you from objectively recognizing the obviousness of both efforts.

If you see that Harrison Ford guy, better make a break for it. He’s a blade runner.

Comment by wordslinger Monday, Jan 23, 17 @ 1:25 pm
==Democrats have sided with labor and left social service providers to fend for themselves==

I don’t think social service providers see it that way…

Comment by Arsenal Monday, Jan 23, 17 @ 1:32 pm
+++
- wordslinger - Monday, Jan 23, 17 @ 12:11 pm:

–Most people, whether they like Trump or not, believe he’s a very successful business man. In a normal world, that’s a compliment.–

Sorry, A Guy is the unsolicited spokesman for “most people.” +++

Thanks for having my back Sling…LOL.

It’s non-effective. We’re entering a very different kind of cycle in 2018. There is an inherent ‘risk’ that Trump may have accomplished something popular by that time. He may not, but banking on his brand being the “big taboo” is pretty risky to me. Besides, there’s only room for one villain per cycle. It’s not going to be Trump or Rauner.

Comment by A guy Monday, Jan 23, 17 @ 1:33 pm
What is the connection between Rauner and Trump? Clearly there must be a video similar to the Mendoza or Bradley nominating speech where the Governor praises Trump. Rauner must be on record somewhere aligning himself with Trump.Nope.

Tough to make a case that is a stretch to begin with without some video or other evidence. There are many differences between Trump and Rauner. Connecting the two will be a massive failure and waste of resources.

Comment by Lucky Pierre Monday, Jan 23, 17 @ 1:44 pm
The only thing LP is correct about is there are some big differences between Rauner and Trump. For instance, the President is a union member and can collect a $100,00 union pension from the Screen Actors Guild. While we all know how Rauner feels about Unions. We also know how the President feels about exporting jobs. Rauner on the other hand hired a Canadian firm for the MyBenefits site. I think the Democrats would get more mileage by running down Rauner to Trump supporters than by tying the two together.

Comment by A Jack Monday, Jan 23, 17 @ 1:47 pm
–Governor Rauner has driven a wedge between labor and the lack of pension reform and social service providers.–

Garbled syntax aside, that’s quite revealing.

Rauner willfully used the office of governor to bleed social service providers for the partisan objective of sticking it to labor?

Did The Boss approve that message? Because I doubt if he would cop to that. Your momentary lapse into honesty must be signs that you need a tune-up.

Comment by wordslinger Monday, Jan 23, 17 @ 1:53 pm
=== Rauner must be on record somewhere aligning himself with Trump===

Here’s a report in the ad, in which Rauner says he supports the nominee Trump

http://abc7.ws/2jRByCm

There’s also the speech at the Illinios GOP convention Rauner supporting Trump

http://bit.ly/2jRzlan

- Lucky Pierre -

Now your being untruthful. Please stop.

Comment by Oswego Willy Monday, Jan 23, 17 @ 1:56 pm
It seems to be effective since I just checked their Facebook page and there about 900 new “likes” since this was screen captured. Maybe it’s a result of the famed Cap Fax boost!

Comment by Rahm's Middle Finger Monday, Jan 23, 17 @ 1:57 pm
–There are many differences between Trump and Rauner. Connecting the two will be a massive failure and waste of resources.–

LOL, then what are you complaining about? You should be all for the effort.

Why would a pre-programmed partisan like yourself try to help the Democrats by waving them off a waste of time and resources?

Some poker face.

Comment by wordslinger Monday, Jan 23, 17 @ 2:00 pm
People, Rich is asking you to rate the effectiveness of a Facebook ad which is supposed to garner followers for its page. Rating it on any other parameter makes no sense. It is a very good ad for converting opposition to Trump into opposition to Rauner on its Facebook page.

Comment by Reality Check Monday, Jan 23, 17 @ 2:00 pm
===There is an inherent ‘risk’ that Trump may have accomplished something popular by that time. He may not, but banking on his brand being the “big taboo” is pretty risky to me.===

Hmm.

===Besides, there’s only room for one villain per cycle. It’s not going to be Trump or Rauner.===

- A Guy -

You say you that Trump and Rauner “won’t” be the villain, declaratively, yet you only call it “risky” a mere sentence before.

It’s not risky if you think it won’t happen.

Further, midterm elections generally don’t favor the incumbent President’s party, let alone a governor, today, that is upside down on favorables without any negatives ads rolling today.

Rauner supported Trump, made the pitch for Trump at the state convection. The connection in video is there with Rauner saying he supports the nominee, Donald Trump.

Trump us upside down too, and lost Illinois, handily.

I do think this stand alone message is non-effective, but in a collective with “Bruce Rauner failed” - a skyhook in reverse with Rauner also connected to Trump…

Rauner and Trump can be villains.

It’s up to Social Service groups, advocates, patrons, Labor and Democrats to “show up” in 2018.

We’ll see. But, Rauner and Trump could be villains, history kinda sorta says so

Comment by Oswego Willy Monday, Jan 23, 17 @ 2:15 pm
From your link OW

Rauner’s soundbite was recorded last spring when at least a half dozen Republicans still competed in the primaries. He has never directly endorsed Trump individually and did not attend the GOP convention that nominated Trump.

Also you posted a 20 minute video of Rauner speaking at Illinois GOP convention where Trump’s name is not mentioned a single time.

Other than that, Rauner and Trump are like peas and carrots.

Who is being untruthful again?

Comment by Lucky Pierre Monday, Jan 23, 17 @ 2:27 pm
–He may not, but banking on his brand being the “big taboo” is pretty risky to me.–

What’s the risk? Not trying to tap right now the more than 3 million Illinoisans who voted against him would be insane.

== Besides, there’s only room for one villain per cycle. –

Meaningless statement that ignores the entire, well-documented history of the party of the incumbent president getting clocked in off-prez years. When that president has low approval ratings, history shows the beating is much worse.

Comment by wordslinger Monday, Jan 23, 17 @ 2:29 pm
The 20 minute video does not mention Trump OW. The ads can link to your comments though.

Comment by Lucky Pierre Monday, Jan 23, 17 @ 2:34 pm
After reading everything here, I must say I’ve reconsidered. Sometimes I forget that a large amount of the State is not as interested in State politics as they are Federal. There are plenty of people who don’t know Rauner from Adam, but no and loathe Trump. For that reason, I’d inch the needle to “effective,” but not in any profound sort of way.

Comment by AlfondoGonz Monday, Jan 23, 17 @ 2:38 pm
–The 20 minute video does not mention Trump OW.–

LOL, because Rauner is scared to death to say Trump’s name. Because he’s scared to death to be linked to him.

But it’s really not that difficult to link a governor/officeholders and president of the same party in an off-prez election. It’s only been done since forever.

Comment by wordslinger Monday, Jan 23, 17 @ 2:44 pm
- Lucky Pierre -

Oh, thanks for making it easier for everyone.

Go to the 3:12 mark, then watch until 3:50.

“Thanks!”

Comment by Oswego Willy Monday, Jan 23, 17 @ 2:45 pm
They’re both out-of-touch billionaires who prefer fighting facts and political enemies than governing.

But I voted Not Effective. I agree with OW’s excellent analysis: a focus on “Rauner failed” would be a wiser path.

Comment by Robert the Bruce Monday, Jan 23, 17 @ 2:49 pm
Yes OW and Trump is not mentioned, you can admit that right.

So no sound bite or video tying the two together because none exists. I wouldn’t count on the Governor mentioning Donald Trumo any time soon.

Comment by Lucky Pierre Monday, Jan 23, 17 @ 2:54 pm
Trump was the nominee.

Was there another GOP Nominee for President?

LOL!

Comment by Oswego Willy Monday, Jan 23, 17 @ 3:03 pm
==You say you that Trump and Rauner “won’t” be the villain, declaratively, yet you only call it “risky” a mere sentence before.==

2 separate points; deal with it.

Comment by A guy Monday, Jan 23, 17 @ 3:04 pm
- Lucky Pierre -

Do you think Press won’t ask Rauner in the coming weeks and months…

“Do you support the President?”

What Rauner going to do?

Comment by Oswego Willy Monday, Jan 23, 17 @ 3:05 pm
===2 separate points===

Nah. Words matter.

Risky allows for reward, “won’t” is declarative and definitive, one result.

===deal with it.===

That’s recognizing your words don’t make sense, but it’s on me to “deal with it”

That’s not making a good argument.

Comment by Oswego Willy Monday, Jan 23, 17 @ 3:10 pm
Can’t wait to see the ads OW. I am one of your spinmeisters could produce one where Harry Potter supports Voldemort

Comment by Lucky Pierre Monday, Jan 23, 17 @ 3:10 pm
===Can’t wait to see the ads===

LIFT already did a whole set of Ads. The difference was Rauner wasn’t on the ballot. Keep up.

===I am one of your spinmeisters could produce one where Harry Potter supports Voldemort===

If Harry Potter ever said…

“I support the leader of the Deatheaters”

… I don’t think he was talking about Albus Dumbledore, lol

Comment by Oswego Willy Monday, Jan 23, 17 @ 3:14 pm
How many people outside of Chicago even know what that building is?

Comment by Cheryl44 Monday, Jan 23, 17 @ 3:17 pm
Not Effective …Unless Rauner starts selling ties and naming hotels after himself. To use Star Wars analogy “The Name branding just is not that strong with this one.”

Comment by the Cardinal Monday, Jan 23, 17 @ 3:30 pm
Effective. Very effective. I saw it this morning and loved it immediately. It’s a “thing” now to take selfies in front of Trump Tower, with extended middle finger(s). Not the most mature thing to do, but Trump is DESPISED in populous parts of Illinois. Tying Rauner to Trump is relatively easy. Both are monied and politically wet behind the ears. It doesn’t matter how Trump performs, in the end, because hundreds of thousands of Illinois women hate him and marched downtown to prove it.

Comment by Dome Gnome Monday, Jan 23, 17 @ 4:18 pm
This is what Trolling is. It elicits a response thereby creating a buzz. This is what has been done by IPI for years they just now have the money to tie every Dem to their Madigan message. Alone each Madigan piece seems childish and somewhat cartoonish. Together the theme is driven home. This is a good first shot lets see if there will be more to follow it up as a constant message of out of touch ivory tower billionaire Bruce.

Comment by DuPage Bard Monday, Jan 23, 17 @ 4:47 pm
More effective with people who have seen the building than with those who haven’t. Rauner may not be a political ally of Trump, but his M.O. is exactly the same and so are his policies.

Comment by Angry Chicagoan Monday, Jan 23, 17 @ 5:46 pm
==So no sound bite or video tying the two together because none exists. ==

Stop playing. You’re on CapFax, you know how this goes. They’re members of the same party. Their fates are linked. That’s the whole point of parties. Hell, that’s the basis of Rauner’s entire re-election strategy. Silence- which he won’t be able to maintain anyway- won’t save him. He’ll either be linked to Trump or he’ll make a public break from him- which would blow it up into a much bigger story, frankly.

Comment by Arsenal Monday, Jan 23, 17 @ 10:45 pm