Latest Post | Last 10 Posts | Archives
Previous Post: *** UPDATED x1 - ILGOP responds *** New website features Speaker Madigan’s softer, gentler side
Next Post: We can’t even put on a decent bicentennial celebration
Posted in:
* Steve Daniels…
One year after Exelon convinced state lawmakers and Gov. Bruce Rauner to bail out nuclear power plants, the second-largest power generator in Illinois has decided it’s its turn. Houston-based Dynegy will push for the General Assembly to consider legislation in next month’s veto session that would likely hike electric bills in downstate Illinois to preserve at least some of the company’s financially ailing fleet of coal-fired power plants. Dynegy’s plants are by far the largest source of electricity downstate.
The move follows recent news that Dynegy and the Rauner administration are working to soften state environmental standards on pollutants emitted by coal burners. The proposal, which was submitted Oct. 2 to the Illinois Pollution Control Board for approval, angered environmentalists who negotiated the standards with the coal industry more than a decade ago. […]
Dynegy’s Illinois proposal, which will surface by month’s end in the form of legislative language, would have the state take over the pricing of “capacity”—ratepayer payments to generators for the promise to deliver during peak demand periods. Currently, that’s handled by Midcontinent Independent System Operator, or MISO, the power-grid operator for southern Illinois and much of the Midwest. As energy prices have plummeted, these capacity payments—embedded in the overall electricity prices consumers and businesses pay regardless of whether they buy from utilities or alternative suppliers—have become a far more important part of plant operators’ revenue streams.
But MISO’s most recent capacity auction resulted in a paltry $1.50 per megawatt-day for the southern half of the state. By contrast, plants in the northern half, operating under a different capacity system, are being paid $153.61 per megawatt-day right now. For the average household, the difference between the two is about $115 a year. […]
Ellis stops short of saying Dynegy will close its entire downstate Illinois fleet, or even specific plants, if it doesn’t get relief. But there’s little financial risk to the company in doing so. It essentially paid nothing to acquire the downstate Illinois plants of St. Louis-based Ameren in 2013.
Asking Springfield to endorse a rate increase for all of downstate Illinois heading into a campaign year will be a challenge. Dynegy’s reticence to state the specific consequences of inaction likely will make delay until after November 2018 attractive for lawmakers and Rauner.
* Another reason to wait…
State subsidies to keep open two nuclear power plants took effect in June, hiking electric bills for all homes and businesses. But the ripple effects from last year’s Future Energy Jobs Act may well lead to future increases on top of the new surcharges.
The organization that sets the rules for the wholesale power markets from northern Illinois east to Washington, D.C. , is contemplating changes that would compensate the owners of unsubsidized power plants for the potential harm the subsidies pose to the competitive market. […]
The initiative is in direct response to Illinois’ nuclear subsidies. PJM is charged first with ensuring there’s enough power to keep the lights on during peak demand and secondly with keeping the power markets competitive. […]
Effectively, Chicago-area ratepayers could be paying twice to keep the same plants open. That’s because the subsidies for Exelon are nearly certain to remain at the state-imposed annual limit of $235 million for the decade they’ll be in effect despite provisions in the law calling for the subsidies to decline when market revenues rise. At Exelon’s insistence, the Future Energy Jobs Act was written in such a way to keep the subsidies flowing in most foreseeable market conditions.
“With most of the proposals on the table, Illinois likely will get penalized for the state approving the subsidies to produce cleaner air,” says Greg Poulos, executive director of Columbus, Ohio-based Consumer Advocates of PJM States. […]
Demanding action from PJM are Exelon competitors NRG Energy, based in Princeton, N.J., and Houston-based Dynegy. NRG operates coal- and gas-fired plants serving the Chicago market, and Dynegy is the second-largest generator in Illinois, running a mainly coal-fired fleet downstate.
* And…
More than 60 percent of Americans think climate change is a problem that the government should address, including 80 percent of Democrats and 43 percent of Republicans, according to a new survey from the University of Chicago’s Energy Policy Institute and The Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research.
Those numbers were even higher when limited to those who say they believe in climate change. Seven in 10 Republicans and nearly all Democrats who believe climate change is happening agree that the government needs to take action, the poll found.
“Public opinion around many energy issues tends to be fluid, with people often defaulting to partisan starting points,” said Trevor Tompson, director of The AP-NORC Center, in a statement. “Majorities of both Democrats and Republicans agree that climate change is happening, and there are signs that consensus could happen on other issues, too.”
…Adding… Press release…
The Illinois Clean Jobs Coalition issued the following statement today in the wake of a report published by Crain’s Chicago Business detailing a possible legislative bailout for Dynegy, Inc:
“On Friday, Crain’s Chicago Business broke a story suggesting that backroom discussions could lead to possible bailout legislation for Dynegy in the upcoming veto session, forcing downstate Illinois residential customers and businesses to subsidize this giant out-of-state corporation. This latest backroom deal comes on the heels of news that Governor Rauner’s office and Dynegy worked behind-the-scenes for several months on a new rule that would undermine pollution controls just to pad Dynegy’s profits at the expense of the public. This corporate bailout would represent an unfair rate hike on customers and small businesses in Central and Southern Illinois and would contain no benefits whatsoever to any party besides Dynegy. With new power coming on line under the Future Energy Jobs Act (FEJA), the majority of it expected to be located in Central and Southern Illinois, we urge lawmakers to reject Dynegy’s bailout that would impose new costs on downstate consumers and small businesses and pose new risks to the public’s health in order to shore-up the profits of an out-of-state energy giant. At a time when President Trump and his coal cronies are already moving to bail out companies like Texas-based Dynegy, Illinois needs to do exactly the opposite and prepare for a clean energy future.”
posted by Rich Miller
Monday, Oct 16, 17 @ 12:19 pm
Sorry, comments are closed at this time.
Previous Post: *** UPDATED x1 - ILGOP responds *** New website features Speaker Madigan’s softer, gentler side
Next Post: We can’t even put on a decent bicentennial celebration
WordPress Mobile Edition available at alexking.org.
powered by WordPress.
This was predicted by me and many others during the fight over the Exelon bailout. When you subsidize nukes, coal was going to come drafting behind. And after this happens, you can expect Exelon to come right back asking for an expanded nuke bailout to include Byron and potentially other plants.
Enough is enough.
Comment by BEST Dave Monday, Oct 16, 17 @ 12:46 pm
Love coal plants. Used to market them. But their time is gone.
The whole point of deregulation was to let market forces decide. I do not see why the need for this capacity is so great.
Comment by Last Bull Moose Monday, Oct 16, 17 @ 12:54 pm
Here’s an idea — let the private company fold and if there is a need for the power generation capacity let a public utility purchase the plant.
If tax dollars are going to prop up an industry, might as well cut out the waste by getting rid of the people trying to profit off of their “unprofitable” business.
Comment by Anon Monday, Oct 16, 17 @ 12:58 pm
Looks like it’s already time for Rep. Phelps to earn that new paycheck.
Comment by "Health Reasons" Monday, Oct 16, 17 @ 1:03 pm
I wonder if the self-described free-marketeers at IPI will weigh in on this bailout for allegedly unprofitable coal plants, considering Illinois energy plants are selling excess capacity to customers in other states already.
IPI was noticeably silent on the nuke bailout — but they were all trolling for fat salaries on the state payroll at the time, in the name of liberty and justice, of course,
Comment by wordslinger Monday, Oct 16, 17 @ 1:26 pm
Absolutely right Word. IPI was invisible as we wages the fight. And of course when Gov. Bruce #GovernorBailout Rauner rolled over for Exelon, they were nowhere to be found. And we’re all paying the price - currently about $2 dollars a month for ComEd customers for what they promised would cost no more than 25 cents a month.
Comment by BEST Dave Monday, Oct 16, 17 @ 1:38 pm
In a word: Noooooo…..
Comment by Loop Lady Monday, Oct 16, 17 @ 2:19 pm
It’s hard to sympathize with Dynegy. The power producer has been on a coal and gas plant buying binge in the Midwest and Texas over the last few years. Time for Dynegy to start replacing the older, inefficient plants in its fleet with renewables and other clean energy resources.
Comment by Going nuclear Monday, Oct 16, 17 @ 4:17 pm
Anon,
I don’t believe regulated Illinois Public Utilities can own plants and have them regulated by the ICC. They can own non-regulated plants but they would be in the same box as Dynegy finds themselves.
Comment by Nadia Monday, Oct 16, 17 @ 4:43 pm
If Dynegy gets their bailout they should have to buy the former “crown jewel of Springfield,” CWLP, that has been mismanaged to high heaven.
Comment by Arthur Andersen Monday, Oct 16, 17 @ 6:10 pm
Why wouldn’t we give them subsidies. Gummy bears,crackers,microbrews. What’s s few billion more.
Comment by blue dog dem Monday, Oct 16, 17 @ 10:17 pm
It’s hard to feel bad for any generation companies since they were the loudest voices clamoring for dereg when prices were higher, but not as high as they thought they could get with dereg. Well, they got what they wanted and this is the result when prices are low.
Comment by Downstate43 Tuesday, Oct 17, 17 @ 9:02 am
Generators are required to provide or have the ability to provide excess generation at a 20- 25% rate. Why wouldn’t they sell that when its not being used in the local market? You cant ignore that wind and solar is subsidized
Comment by NothsideNoMore Tuesday, Oct 17, 17 @ 3:44 pm
Looks like the natural gas industry to starting rear its ugly head again .. “enough is enough” ..
Comment by Little Angry Man Wednesday, Oct 18, 17 @ 2:40 pm