Latest Post | Last 10 Posts | Archives
Previous Post: It’s just a bill
Next Post: Reader comments closed for the weekend
Posted in:
* Press release…
Today, Gov. JB Pritzker took the following bill action:
Bill Number: SB 886
Description: Provides for the sale of the James R. Thompson Center by competitive sealed proposal process within two years. The purchaser must enter into an agreement with the City of Chicago and CTA to maintain operations of the Clark & Lake station.
Action: Signed
Effective: ImmediatelyThe timeline of the JRTC sale is as follows:
Phase 1 (Present to Months 3-6) — The state will draft a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) to interested purchasers within the next four to six weeks and will re-engage negotiations with the City of Chicago regarding zoning and transit station within three to six months;
Phase 2 (Months 7-12) — The state will issue an RFQ and begin discussions with interested purchasers in four to six months’ time and draft and publish a Request for Proposal (RFP) to acquire and develop the property in four months’ time;
Phase 3 (Months 12-17) — The state will allow four to five months for interested purchasers to develop their proposals and respond to the RFP;
Phase 4 (Months 15-20) — The state will evaluate proposals, which includes discussions with proposers to clarify responses, within three months;
Phase 5 (Months 17-22) — The state will negotiate and award the contract within two months, which will conclude before the 24-month deadline.
Simultaneous with the sale of Thompson Center, the state will implement a planned relocation of current Thompson Center employees to the Michael A. Bilandic Building and other under-utilized, state-owned or rented facilities, consistent with recommendations made by the newly-created Pension Asset Value and Transfer Taskforce.
* The Question: Think it’ll happen? Take the poll and then explain your answer in comments, please…
…Adding… Lori Lightfoot on the sale of the Thompson Center back in February…
As a lover of Chicago’s architectural history, in general, my first instinct will always be to protect historical treasures. The Thompson Center has had a checkered history and there are valid concerns about maintenance. The fight between outgoing Governor Rauner and Mayor Emanuel should be in the rearview mirror. I would welcome dialogue with the Pritzker administration to devise a plan for the building’s future.
posted by Rich Miller
Friday, Apr 5, 19 @ 2:34 pm
Sorry, comments are closed at this time.
Previous Post: It’s just a bill
Next Post: Reader comments closed for the weekend
WordPress Mobile Edition available at alexking.org.
powered by WordPress.
This is very valuable real estate–I would hope the state could make some money off of it.
Comment by 32nd Ward Roscoe Village Friday, Apr 5, 19 @ 2:38 pm
I think this will happen just because people want to spite Rauner
Comment by Anonymous Friday, Apr 5, 19 @ 2:40 pm
It’s happening
Comment by The Captain Friday, Apr 5, 19 @ 2:40 pm
Voted “Yes”…
I think GTCR will buy the property, unload everything there, then sell what’s left to a company that will make it into a water park.
Comment by Oswego Willy Friday, Apr 5, 19 @ 2:42 pm
Why would it not?
Comment by Fav Human Friday, Apr 5, 19 @ 2:45 pm
The architectural challenge of keeping the elevated and subway transit while developing something new will be pretty fun for whoever goes for this.
Comment by State Sen. Clay Davis Friday, Apr 5, 19 @ 2:48 pm
Voted yes. I think the biggest two challenges will be:
1) Ensuring smooth transition for gov’t employees in the Thompson Center, which won’t stop a sale and
2) Having a clear plan in place for the CTA station, which hopefully won’t be too difficult considering the Thompson Center already segregates CTA traffic from the other business in the building.
Comment by OutOfState Friday, Apr 5, 19 @ 2:48 pm
Voted yes simply because Bruce “I’m not in charge” Rauner is not in charge anymore.
Comment by don the legend Friday, Apr 5, 19 @ 2:52 pm
I think it will happen, but may need to be extended beyond 24 months. Especially for phase 3 because bidders may require more time to evaluate the cost / benefit of owning that building.
Comment by A Jack Friday, Apr 5, 19 @ 2:58 pm
Yes, I have to have faith that because this seems open and transparent
and planned
It will have a better chance
Comment by Honeybear Friday, Apr 5, 19 @ 2:58 pm
I voted yes. The property is one of the few parcels in the city with direct access to subways to O’Hare and Midway. Plus the location is great for both tourists and people on business.
In regards to the historic preservation and keeping the trains running, Helmut Jahn provided the answer. He proposed keeping most of the building intact and then building a supertall skyscraper on the Southwest corner.
Comment by City Guy Friday, Apr 5, 19 @ 3:01 pm
Yes, because there is money to be made.
Comment by HCMcB4 Friday, Apr 5, 19 @ 3:03 pm
It seemed to me that the GA was blocking this under Rauner to keep him from getting a win and Emmanuel was blocking things on the city’s end to try and get a bigger say in what kind of building would replace it. With both of those obstacles going away, the hardest thing will be procuring the needed funds to get all of the state agencies into other offices (which won’t be cheap).
Comment by NIU Grad Friday, Apr 5, 19 @ 3:04 pm
Voted Yes because it’s in a prime location, but like with any other real estate deal, it’s all about the dollars. I’m sure they’ll get a lot of lowball offers on it, but whether anyone ponies up for what the state thinks its worth, is a bit of an unknown. Since prospective buyers have already had a few years to consider it, I would think the queue is already in place. It would seem to me that repurposing it would make more sense than tearing it down and starting over.
Comment by Stuntman Bob's Brother Friday, Apr 5, 19 @ 3:04 pm
I voted yes because building a new high rise will be an excellent opportunity for the State.
I do have concerns with who could be be over seeing the sale at CMS. CMS has not made any changes within their property management department or procurement. I hope this will be carefully monitored and transparent.
Comment by Klaus VonBulow Friday, Apr 5, 19 @ 3:04 pm
What were the claims the City was making, and will Lori make the same demands?
Comment by NoGifts Friday, Apr 5, 19 @ 3:07 pm
There goes the food court. Bummer.
I think it will happen because it’s a valuable piece of real estate and the monetary value of the problems with vacating the building and maintaining station access are far outweighed by the potential development value.
Comment by Six Degrees of Separation Friday, Apr 5, 19 @ 3:09 pm
I voted Yes, but I don’t think I’ll live long enough to see the current structure torn-down and replaced. I think a buyer will take it on, invest some money cleaning it up, and rent most of it back to the state. The state will get some upfront cash, but will end up paying a lot more in the long run.
That’s how we roll in Illinois.
Comment by 47th Ward Friday, Apr 5, 19 @ 3:09 pm
No Democrats are currently blocking the sale from the legislative side or the 4th Floor of City Hall. Getting rid of that building should have occurred 3-4 years ago.
So I voted “yes.”
Comment by Louis G. Atsaves Friday, Apr 5, 19 @ 3:15 pm
224 votes and exactly 50/50.
Nobody knows
Comment by The Dude Friday, Apr 5, 19 @ 3:20 pm
Voted yes. We seem to have a governor interested in being governor and one who is also competent back in charge.
Comment by JS Mill Friday, Apr 5, 19 @ 3:24 pm
Is the bill number in the press release wrong or am I reading it wrong? The GA webpage lists SB 886 as a shell bill that has not yet had its third reading in the Senate.
http://tinyurl.com/y6ppm6hc
Comment by Nick Name Friday, Apr 5, 19 @ 3:27 pm
Yes this is prime real estate, yes it is well located and valuable. But…. This is an enormous project. Our economy is showing recession signs and investors are aware of this. Chicago doesn’t see the same new construction investment as other cities. Remember Block 37?????
From a taxpayer perspective, this is a terrible deal. Yes the State is a bad building owner, but the State is also a bad tenant. Taxpayers will be paying higher than market value rent in perpetuity.
Comment by Merica Friday, Apr 5, 19 @ 3:28 pm
Nick, it’s from last year.
Comment by Rich Miller Friday, Apr 5, 19 @ 3:29 pm
I voted yes. JB and LL both want this to happen.
Question. I have been told that as state property the City of Chicago has no taxing, police or zoning authority over the Thompson Center. Could the State keep this autonomy by leasing the site for 99 years? It would cost the City revenue, it make the site more valuable.
Comment by Last Bull Moose Friday, Apr 5, 19 @ 3:30 pm
==There goes the food court. Bummer.==
Heh. It is a good food court.
Comment by Slugger O'Toole Friday, Apr 5, 19 @ 3:31 pm
No, they need to book the revenue from the sale of the building for at least 3 or 4 more budget cycles.
Comment by Anonymous Friday, Apr 5, 19 @ 3:32 pm
===Nick, it’s from last year.===
Ah, thanks.
Comment by Nick Name Friday, Apr 5, 19 @ 3:38 pm
I think if there is anything that Rauner wanted that also makes sense to Democrats but didn’t happen during Rauner’s term, there is going to be a strong desire to get it done to spite Rauner, which is a sentiment I fully support. And that goes for things beyond JRTC, though I’m not sure how many of those things there are.
Comment by Joe Bidenopolous Friday, Apr 5, 19 @ 3:40 pm
I was there two weeks ago. The granite slabs in the Thompson Center plaza are breaking in half and covered with orange cones.
It’s a valuable property in the hands of private developers. Sell it to someone ready to demolish the monstrosity and put up something worthwhile like a hotel or office building.
Comment by Practical Politics Friday, Apr 5, 19 @ 3:42 pm
== Ensuring smooth transition for gov’t employees in the Thompson Center ==
I looked at a couple of sites over 20 years ago to move some operations. It is doable with the proper planning.
Comment by RNUG Friday, Apr 5, 19 @ 3:45 pm
Interestingly, not many of the agencies that are there have that many staff. Outside of the constitutional officers, few of the state agencies within the building consist of significant numbers more than just their executive leadership. There are exceptions, like IDFPR, IDHR, DCEO, IHRC, and Revenue, but many of the other agencies read the writing on the wall and got out.
However, I do hope they take care to keep the agencies relatively close to each other…especially those with front-line staff that interact with the public. The nightmare scenario is having members of the public having to hustle around the downtown to accomplish basic services that require multi-agency interaction.
Comment by NIU Grad Friday, Apr 5, 19 @ 3:51 pm
Yes. It’s a prime piece of real estate with a built-in CTA station. It’s a developers dream. There will be fierce competition to get it. For that matter all government offices (other than actual City Hall) in the downtown area should be relocated to where rents are cheaper.
Comment by Just Me 2 Friday, Apr 5, 19 @ 4:00 pm
My concern is the potential use of the building. It seems like the economy is softening right now, and even with a strong economy, it seems that the Loop market may be saturated both for office and residential.
Still, although it will take work to find a buyer, I think it will happen, although it might push that two year limit.
Comment by Gooner Friday, Apr 5, 19 @ 4:04 pm
@Just Me
Are you going to redirect CTA lines so government offices are still accessible?
Comment by Fast Eddie Friday, Apr 5, 19 @ 4:10 pm
Finally it will become The Scott Kennedy Water Park. And of course an attached Hyatt Hotel.
Comment by Been There Friday, Apr 5, 19 @ 5:01 pm
Fast Eddie - I’m not sure I understand your question, but the CTA lines at JRTC are currently above and below the street, they do not actually go through the JRTC property.
Rents in River North, West Loop, and South Loop are about half of what they are in the loop, and still pretty accessible by transit. The State needs to reduce costs, and this is low-hanging fruit.
Both the Chicago Park District and Chicago Public Schools have moved their offices out of the loop, the State can do the same.
Comment by Just Me 2 Friday, Apr 5, 19 @ 9:02 pm