Capitol Fax.com - Your Illinois News Radar

* UPDATED x1 * Megaproject near Soldier Field tucked into the BIMP

Posted in:

Illinois
Updated Posts

The state of Illinois potentially will be on the hook for more than $5 billion in equity and financing costs if a provision to speed construction of a megaproject near Soldier Field is approved by the General Assembly in this weekend’s extended spring session.

Elements of the deal for the huge One Central project have been in the discussion stage for weeks, with Bob Dunn of Landmark Development meeting with House Speaker Mike Madigan, Deputy Gov. Dan Hynes and other officials.

But actual language didn’t surface until Friday afternoon, when it was included in a must-pass budget implementation bill.

(If you want to read it for yourself, click here and go to pages 876, 904, 922, 941 and 978.)

The provisions would create a new Civic Transit and Infrastructure Fund. It would collect and disburse tax funds owed to a private developer “pursuant to the public private partnership entered into by the public agency on behalf of the state of Illinois to the Public-Private Partnership for Civic and Transit Infrastructure Project Act enacted in this amendatory act.” […]

Under the bill, the state would begin to pay $200 million a year to the private developer starting in 2023—presuming a contract is negotiated, and the big transit station that Dunn promises is operational then. The state would give him $200 million that year, with annual payments rising to $445 million in 2045.

*** UPDATE *** Pritzker administration…

There is no cost to the state in the BIMP. The Governor has not committed to developing this project. This allows Landmark to explore whether it’s viable for them to get federal backing. If they can, then we could consider whether or not we would like to do an agreement.

None of these provisions go into effect unless and until a separate agreement is reached. The BIMP allows GOMB to negotiate a P3 with Landmark and gives Landmark time to apply for federal RIFF funding in the event a deal can be reached in the future.

posted by Rich Miller
Friday, May 31, 19 @ 7:47 pm

Comments

Does the state get anything if the developer doesn’t perform the services or have it up and running by 2023?

Comment by Interested Friday, May 31, 19 @ 7:55 pm
https://youtu.be/msDcShv_r20

Comment by Dance Band on the Titanic Friday, May 31, 19 @ 7:56 pm
The language allows the state to review the project. It slows down the development.

Comment by Stuff Friday, May 31, 19 @ 8:02 pm
I assume the connect will all make tons of money. But I am old and cynical. If that is what it takes so be it. Sounds like a good project.

Comment by DuPage Saint Friday, May 31, 19 @ 8:07 pm
This is a terrible idea. If the Democrats were interested in governing just a little bit, they’d focus on a balanced budget and not these silly games.

Comment by Token Conservative Friday, May 31, 19 @ 8:24 pm
To quote my favorite duck…Dispicable.

Comment by Dance Like No One Is Watching Friday, May 31, 19 @ 8:29 pm
=== federal RIFF funding ===

Do they mean RRIF, as in Railroad Rehabilitation & Improvement Financing?

Comment by Louis Capricious Friday, May 31, 19 @ 8:36 pm
Keep the State out of the lending and real estate business. Always ends badly.

Comment by Bruce Friday, May 31, 19 @ 8:37 pm
It slows it down? Hardly.

Comment by Ok Friday, May 31, 19 @ 8:50 pm
Sounded like there was a lot of upside for state — including $$$ for pensions. Put the risk on private sector

Comment by GoTime Friday, May 31, 19 @ 9:32 pm