Latest Post | Last 10 Posts | Archives
Previous Post: White getting heat from all sides during voter registration controversy
Next Post: Southern Illinois gets Pritzker focus
Posted in:
* Ted Cox at One Illinois…
Lead sponsors of the Clean Energy Jobs Act touted the measure Tuesday as a way to halt an $846 million hike in Illinois electricity rates brought on by the Trump administration as “a massive bailout of the fossil-fuel industry.”
At a news conference at the Thompson Center, state Rep. Ann Williams of Chicago blamed two appointees of President Trump for a ruling last month by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission that would potentially force Illinois to pay $846 million more for coal-powered energy rather than invest in its own renewable energy sources.
Pointing out that “market forces” had already prompted the announced closure of four Illinois coal-powered energy plants last year, Williams said, “It makes no sense to pay these dirty, out-of-date plants millions and millions of dollars a year when we could be developing a renewable-energy future right here in Illinois.”
Basically, the Trump appointees backed a proposal that would force Illinois to buy its energy through a federal market auction that has been weighted to prioritize fossil fuels. One of the key proposals of CEJA, Williams pointed out, is that it would assign the Illinois Power Agency the duty to buy energy to fill the capacity for Illinois consumers, independent of that federal auction. If passed, she added, the act would also set an “ironclad” reduction of 5 percent in electricity rates.
* Jerry Nowicki at Capitol News Illinois..
Illinois is part of the federally regulated PJM grid, which purchases capacity from electricity generators on behalf of all or portions of 13 states and Washington, D.C., at an auction every year.
Capacity procurement is not the purchase of actual energy, but the guarantee that the generator will be able to supply a certain amount of energy at any time — especially during the grid’s highest usage times — over a specified period of time. Customers pay for these capacity costs through the supply charge on their electric bills.
On Dec. 19, FERC voted 2-1 to change the PJM rules regarding the minimum offer price a generator can bid, noting in a news release the action was taken to “address the impact of state subsidies on the wholesale capacity market.” […]
The Clean Energy Jobs Coalition also said the ruling “directly undermines” Illinois’ 2016 passage of the Future Energy Jobs Act, which created renewable energy credits and zero emissions credits for wind, solar and nuclear power generators.
* Dan Petrella at the Tribune…
The state’s last major overhaul of energy policy — the Future Energy Jobs Act in 2016 — was the result of long negotiations and compromise among ComEd and Exelon, environmental groups, consumer advocates and others. The law subsidizes a pair of Exelon’s Illinois nuclear plants while also investing in solar and wind power.
With the federal investigation of ComEd looming, it’s unclear what lawmakers’ appetite will be for taking on major energy legislation this spring. But Williams and Castro said they want to move ahead, regardless of what happens with the federal probe.
“ComEd has to provide power — that’s how we get our power. The generation that Exelon provides is necessary to turn the lights on,” Williams said. “But in terms of setting the foundation and laying the groundwork and establishing how we want our future to look, our renewable energy future in Illinois, I don’t think they are going to be part of that broader conversation.”
* Illinois Chamber…
It’s disingenuous for Clean Energy Jobs Act (CEJA) advocates to claim with any certainty that the decision from federal energy regulators on the operation of a regional electricity market that impacts northern Illinois will significantly raise electricity rates on consumers. That true impact is still unknown and the figures being used today have been refuted. CEJA advocates should stop trying to panic the Legislature and Governor into action. We should not risk electric reliability and unnecessarily increase costs on Illinois consumers before this process plays out and we fully understand the impact on electricity prices and the competitive market.
What we do know is the passage of CEJA would result in significant increases in electricity bills for Illinois residents and businesses. CEJA’s 600-plus pages include a host of unfunded initiatives that lack budgets or cost caps. Not to mention, the bill’s solution to modify how Illinois acquires “capacity” – the issue at the center of calls to pass CEJA – could spike northern Illinois electricity prices by $414 million annually. This is not a choice between seeking lower emissions and keeping costs down. Both are necessary, achievable, and proven through innovation and competition.
posted by Rich Miller
Wednesday, Jan 22, 20 @ 9:56 am
Sorry, comments are closed at this time.
Previous Post: White getting heat from all sides during voter registration controversy
Next Post: Southern Illinois gets Pritzker focus
WordPress Mobile Edition available at alexking.org.
powered by WordPress.
– CEJA advocates should stop trying to panic the Legislature and Governor into action.–
The Chamber is correct.
Panicking the legislature and governor into action is ComEd’s job.
Comment by King Louis XVI Wednesday, Jan 22, 20 @ 10:06 am
I think there should be a 5-year moratorium on all ComEd-related legislation.
Comment by Chicagonk Wednesday, Jan 22, 20 @ 10:34 am
Folks, this is illinois. If we allow investigations to halt necessary legislation on important issues, the general assembly may as well cease to exist. Also, before casting aspersions on ComEd, remember that the investigation involves a number of legislators too. Just like we cannot judge every member on the bad actions of the few, we cannot question entire corporations because of a few bad actors. A to now or prepare to choke on coal fumes and ash.
Comment by Bootedgeedge Wednesday, Jan 22, 20 @ 10:42 am
“Also, before casting aspersions on ComEd, remember that the investigation involves a number of legislators too. Just like we cannot judge every member on the bad actions of the few, we cannot question entire corporations because of a few bad actors.”
Is this intended to be satire, like we shouldn’t judge an entire fraternity on the basis of a few bad apples?
Comment by Chicago Cynic Wednesday, Jan 22, 20 @ 10:51 am
Trump loves to call people socialists even when he (or his flunkies) are practicing socialism, but for corporations.
Comment by JS Mill Wednesday, Jan 22, 20 @ 10:53 am
@Bootedgeedge - I’m not sure if you are trolling or not, but the rot goes to the top at ComEd. Or did Pramaggiore just abruptly retire to spend more time with her family?
Comment by Chicagonk Wednesday, Jan 22, 20 @ 11:41 am
=== CEJA advocates should stop trying to panic the Legislature and Governor into action. ===
King Louis nailed it.
Also, can we flash back to Todd Maisch comments on pension reform?
Comment by Thomas Paine Wednesday, Jan 22, 20 @ 11:53 am
First, the PJM capacity market was neither invented nor expanded by Trump and is a result of a decade of insistence that the lights stay on at all costs. It doesn’t tilt towards one type of generator or another and instead simply pays all equally based on their ability to supply electricity when and if it is needed.
Second, the move to renewable resources will not remove the need for a capacity market, it will instead simply shift who is receiving the payments
Comment by Carbon Gary Wednesday, Jan 22, 20 @ 1:37 pm
Carbon Gary, did you read the article? “It doesn’t tilt towards one type of generator or another…” That’s literally what the new rule does, prioritize coal plants in 2020 at the precipice of climate collapse. Trump doesn’t believe in climate change and it shows in his policies. The question I have for you, Carbon Gary, is do you?
Comment by Biker Wednesday, Jan 22, 20 @ 4:28 pm
“Trump doesn’t believe in climate change and it shows in his policies. The question I have for you, Carbon Gary, is do you?”
You could just respond to the specific questions he asked, but yes, please engage in that kind of silly playground taunting. You either with me or agin’ me? Yea, it’s just that simple. Silly.
Comment by = Wednesday, Jan 22, 20 @ 6:00 pm
I was searching web and just came across your site. The articles you’ve provided are unique, interesting and a worth read.
http://www.scienceofhealthy.com/
Comment by sehrish Thursday, Jan 23, 20 @ 12:35 am
I was searching web and just came across your site. The articles you’ve provided are unique, interesting and a worth read.
http://www.scienceofhealthy.com/
Comment by sehrish Thursday, Jan 23, 20 @ 12:35 am