Latest Post | Last 10 Posts | Archives
Previous Post: *** LIVE COVERAGE ***
Next Post: Remap reformers need to start focusing on people of color
Posted in:
* My weekly syndicated newspaper column…
Chicago public radio station WBEZ recently published a story about emails between Illinois House Speaker Michael Madigan’s former consigliere, Mike McClain, and top staffers in Madigan’s office. Federal investigators raided the former ComEd lobbyist’s home last year.
The WBEZ reporters culled pretty much all the really good stuff, including discussions about how Madigan was McClain’s “number one client,” getting former Madigan staffers jobs with ComEd and muscling a pro-ComEd resolution through a committee by replacing some Democratic members so that the vote was unanimous.
I decided to take a look at the emails myself to see what else might be there.
The determination to jam that resolution through with a unanimous vote is unusual because it was an “agreed” resolution. ComEd parent company Exelon was pushing legislation in 2014 to bail out their nuclear power plants, but the four legislative leaders decided to just pass a resolution urging various other entities to help Exelon. Speaker Madigan was the chief sponsor and House Republican Leader Jim Durkin was the chief co-sponsor.
An Exelon lobbyist emailed McClain on the afternoon of May 27, 2014 to report that he had nine “Yes” votes out of 16 committee members, with an “outside chance” of flipping one of the “No” votes to his side. McClain forwarded the email to Madigan’s then-chief of staff Tim Mapes and Madigan’s then-Issues Staff director Will Cousineau, among others. And then three hours after the original email was sent, Cousineau replied with what he said would be the final roll call. Five House Democrats on the committee who had been identified as opponents were to be replaced with five supportive Democrats and a sixth had been flipped to Exelon.
“The opponents won’t have contemplated all the subs we’re lining up since I don’t like to rely on Republicans,” Cousineau announced, even though there wasn’t much of any formal opposition.
“I love you,” McClain replied.
Mapes replied to say he’d bet McClain’s lobbyist friends hadn’t given this replacement tactic any thought, and asked if McClain was in charge of Exelon’s lobbying efforts.
“No,” McClain wrote, “but we’re going to have a little bit of a discussion after session about the quality of their lobby.” McClain called Exelon’s Statehouse operation “101 level.”
That the House Democratic staff and the ComEd lobbyist McClain would expend so much effort to make sure that Madigan’s word was gold to a giant energy company tells you much of what you need to know about how that operation worked at the time.
And the internal mindset was further summed up months later when Mapes complained about his workload to McClain.
“We love the guy,” McClain wrote, “but his requests are totally consuming and because we love him we do not want to fail even on the simplest of items. It is what it is. We would not change it but it is what it is.”
That’s Team Madigan in a nutshell.
There were numerous mentions of jobs and other favors in the email exchanges.
Raymond Nice, for instance, is a longtime Madigan precinct worker who also lobbied for ComEd after he retired from Cook County. The town of Merrionette Park, where Nice once had a contract, was recently hit with a federal subpoena. The subpoena also demanded all communications between the village and Madigan, McClain, Mapes and Madigan’s alderman Marty Quinn and Quinn’s brother Kevin.
Kevin Quinn was the beneficiary of a fundraising effort by McClain after he was forced out of his job with Madigan when Alaina Hampton complained about sexual harassment.
I’d heard that Madigan only asked Gov. Bruce Rauner to hire a few people and Nice was one. Just before Rauner was inaugurated, McClain and Mapes exchanged emails about who Madigan had placed on state boards and commissions. McClain led off his list with “Ray Nice….you already know about him, of course.”
The emails reveal just how involved the lobbyist McClain was in House Democratic operations.
Numerous emails were exchanged, for example, after a reform group offered to host a meeting with Gov. Rauner and the four leaders to try and break the budget impasse. McClain was involved in crafting the House Democratic response to Gov. Pat Quinn’s budget veto of legislator salaries as punishment for not reforming pensions. And Mapes summoned McClain to an exclusive upper-echelon meeting with Madigan to discuss what to do about the upcoming spring session with incoming Gov. Rauner.
The emails make crystal clear that McClain was closer to Madigan’s operation than anyone but Mapes. McClain is now gone and so is Mapes after his own sexual harassment scandal. Only Madigan is left.
posted by Rich Miller
Monday, Mar 2, 20 @ 8:57 am
Sorry, comments are closed at this time.
Previous Post: *** LIVE COVERAGE ***
Next Post: Remap reformers need to start focusing on people of color
WordPress Mobile Edition available at alexking.org.
powered by WordPress.
The significant movement to the left of the Democrat Caucus combined with the independent financial muscle of the Governor make for interesting times.
Many on the left will not shed a tear when/if the next shoe drops . . . . .and they relish that the Governor is not owned by the Speaker as they see him as the ultimate conduit for forcing the exit when/if the situation gets worse.
Comment by Say What? Monday, Mar 2, 20 @ 9:23 am
=== Democrat Caucus===
(Sigh)
To the Post,
The insight of these emails, not unlike for comparison the Diana Rauner emails, removes some of the mystery of not only the thinking, but the process to things in both operations.
It can’t be denied the interwoven aspects of McClain. Not only in decisions or recommendations, you read about how McClain himself, (no pun intended), sees his own importance while trying to put the importance on what he, McClain, sees for Himself.
There’s also that feel of “this thing of ours” permeating among the words. If your “in”, then you’re “in” and out friends, and our people need to be rewarded, and at times reminded, the costs of being in “this thing of ours”
Lastly, with ComEd / Exelon, there’s this “come along” feel that the more ComEd /Exelon can come along with this thing of ours, we will be allies… but first we need to show ComEd we can deliver, and deliver without any question who should be credited.
Thing is, the criminality of the ComEd / Exelon issues, while its becoming increasingly seedy the more that comes out, seedy isn’t criminal, and the line of ethics versus criminality will be the biggest thing to see if and when federal investigators decide to drop the full weight of charges on one or all.
Great read, Rich. Thanks for breaking down things and letting, at least me, see things in that different light.
Will the McClain version of “this thing of ours” be a criminal entity, not unlike CFR, and will McClain be that ringleader, not unlike Mike Tristano?
The emails are one heck of a map.
Comment by Oswego Willy Monday, Mar 2, 20 @ 9:39 am
This article backed by the email evidence only reinforces the futility with which most sentient Illinoisans view the prospect for any change in our state’s reputation for political chicanery.
Comment by Responsa Monday, Mar 2, 20 @ 9:40 am
===“We love the guy,” McClain wrote, “but his requests are totally consuming and because we love him we do not want to fail even on the simplest of items. It is what it is. We would not change it but it is what it is.”===
Look in my eyes, what do you see?
The cult of personality
I know your anger, I know your dreams
I’ve been everything you want to be
I’m the cult of personality
Comment by 47th Ward Monday, Mar 2, 20 @ 10:05 am
==- Responsa - Monday, Mar 2, 20 @ 9:40 am:==
If you think this isn’t happening in other states, I’ve got a bridge in Brooklyn for you. It’s just that the political dynamics in other states rarely lead to one staying as a legislative leader so long, either from change in the partisanship of the chamber or desire for other offices.
Comment by Precinct Captain Monday, Mar 2, 20 @ 10:14 am
Rich - I thought this was one of your best columns in years. Very well done.
Comment by JP Altgeld Monday, Mar 2, 20 @ 10:31 am
it can’t be much of a “scandal” if sexual harassment allegations against Mapes were ruled unfounded.
Comment by Chump Monday, Mar 2, 20 @ 10:53 am
“Merrionette Park…” three suburban election precincts masquerading as a village.
Comment by Practical Politics Monday, Mar 2, 20 @ 11:17 am
Why did Madigan release emails to WBEZ when not forced under IL FOIA law?
Comment by 44th Ward Monday, Mar 2, 20 @ 11:20 am
The cheese stands alone
Comment by Peoples Republic of Oak Park Monday, Mar 2, 20 @ 11:40 am
==- 44th Ward - Monday, Mar 2, 20 @ 11:20 am:==
Ethics and transparency?
Comment by Precinct Captain Monday, Mar 2, 20 @ 2:31 pm