Latest Post | Last 10 Posts | Archives
Previous Post: Schimpf doubles down on his worst idea ever while rewriting history
Next Post: Frerichs hit for letter to money managers
Posted in:
* Greg Hinz…
Springfield progressives and a member of the Cook County Board are pushing a plan to raise up to $1.2 billion a year to help the disabled, including undocumented immigrants, by doubling the Illinois’ estate tax. […]
The payments would go to each of the roughly 270,000 Illinois residents who get federal Supplemental Security Income, commonly known as SSI, plus an estimated over 84,000 undocumented immigrants that sponsors say are disabled and deserve benefits, too. Sponsors say the money would get current SSI recipients just to the poverty level, since SSI itself does not provide that much of a benefit.
Money for the new spending would come from raising the state’s tax on estates worth $4 million or more from 4.95 percent now to 9.95 percent.
* Another react to the DuPage County Sheriff’s recent harangue against HB3913…
Hello,
I wanted to take the opportunity to respond to this post and Sheriff Mendrick’s comments about it. I am the Director of the Housing Team at the Shriver Center on Poverty Law, part of the coalition pushing this bill. I agree with Sheriff Mendrick that sexual assault prevention is our main priority and of the utmost importance.
The reason I chose to support this bill is that residency restrictions have been exhaustively researched and do not prevent sexual abuse or assault. Not only do they fail to prevent sexual violence, but they increase the social breakdowns that lead to crime, including sexual assault; the Sex Offenses and Sex Offender Registration Task Force, formed by the General Assembly, concluded in a 2018 report that residency restrictions “can prevent people convicted of sex offending from engaging in pro-social activities, such as work, that guard against reoffending.” I decided that I care more about protecting the public than hurting people with past convictions for sex offenses.
As was noted, the bill’s changes in weekly requirements are a matter of common sense. Currently, homeless registrants (on several registries) have to re-register 51 times more often than people with fixed addresses. All other registration requirements remain the same. This bill stops targeting people simply because they are homeless but still requires people to register annually or quarterly, and anytime any other information changes.
Remember that most people in this category are homeless because of these laws. In fact, most had safe and stable housing but were forced into homelessness as the restriction zones constantly shift. This bill would open up some housing and reduce homelessness.
Having to register every week prevents people from maintaining stable employment and taking care of their families. Several men pay rent and take care of their kids but have to sleep on trains at night because of these laws. There are men who have to take their kids with them to register. This is simply not sustainable for already indigent persons.
One of our main partners on this bill is CAASE, a victim advocates group, along with many other groups who have seen the damage caused by these laws. The question here is not ‘do you care about victims of sexual violence?’ but rather ‘do you care about hurting people with past sex offense convictions more than preventing sexual assault’?
Best,
Eric Sirota
Director of Housing Justice
Shriver Center on Poverty Law
* Capitol News Illinois…
Advocates and lawmakers have reintroduced legislation that would end a special gas utility surcharge that allows companies to raise customer bills in order to pay for infrastructure development with limited regulatory oversight.
The gas utility surcharge, known as the Qualified Infrastructure Plant, became law in 2013 after similar formula rate legislation that benefited utility giant Commonwealth Edison was passed.
House Bill 3941, sponsored by Rep. Joyce Mason, D-Gurnee, and accompanying Senate Bill 570, sponsored by Sen. Ram Villivalam, D-Chicago, would phase out the surcharge by the end of 2021. It is otherwise not set to expire in 2023.
By ending the program, the legislation would restore traditional oversight of rate hikes. Advocates say the existing QIP charge allows for gas utility companies such as Ameren Illinois, Nicor Gas and Peoples Gas to bring in revenue at a faster pace than it would with traditional regulations.
* Related…
* Oak Brook’s efforts to have red-light cameras removed fuel State Rep. Deanne Mazzochi’s bill to remove all cameras in Illinois
* Lawmakers Push To Waive Standardized Testing In 2021, Despite Feds’ Insistence
* Proposed Bill Would Target Certain Student Groups For Suicide Prevention In Schools
posted by Rich Miller
Tuesday, Mar 16, 21 @ 11:02 am
Sorry, comments are closed at this time.
Previous Post: Schimpf doubles down on his worst idea ever while rewriting history
Next Post: Frerichs hit for letter to money managers
WordPress Mobile Edition available at alexking.org.
powered by WordPress.
=by doubling the Illinois’ estate tax=
The Illinois Farm Bureau just got triggered.
Comment by Cool Papa Bell Tuesday, Mar 16, 21 @ 11:22 am
Most farmers have good ways to avoid it by incorporating. In the long run it is probably a better idea then just letting someone getting it thru an estate. In that way the family can better manage it with others.
Comment by Publius Tuesday, Mar 16, 21 @ 11:26 am
=Remember that most people in this category are homeless because of these laws. In fact, most had safe and stable housing but were forced into homelessness=
They also were convicted of a crime that landed them on the Sex Offender Registration list.
Comment by Donnie Elgin Tuesday, Mar 16, 21 @ 11:30 am
Please, let’s do something about automatic rate increases for utilities. Labeling a rate increase as a fee fools no one. The state has the power and duty to regulate, so get on with it.
Comment by Friendly Bob Adams Tuesday, Mar 16, 21 @ 11:45 am
“doubling the Illinois’ estate tax.”
It’s an interesting play given that the Feds now exempt all estates under $12 million for individuals and $24 million for couples. So for the vast majority of estates below the super-super rich, this just takes back some of what the Feds have given up. Not a huge deal.
Comment by Chicago Cynic Tuesday, Mar 16, 21 @ 11:48 am
=== The question here is not ‘do you care about victims of sexual violence?’ but rather ‘do you care about hurting people with past sex offense convictions more than preventing sexual assault’?===
The answer here is yes. The people against HB3913 don’t care about victims of sexual assault.
It’s obvious.
Comment by Sling Tuesday, Mar 16, 21 @ 1:52 pm
@Publius - They might.
But statewide and nationally farmers and their lobby groups are among the strongest voices against the so called death tax.
Maybe hit ag in the pocket after the IFB and other farm groups teamed up to loudly tear down the idea of the graduated income tax.
Comment by Cool Papa Bell Tuesday, Mar 16, 21 @ 3:21 pm
Lessening the restrictions on sex offenders, statistically the hardest most problematic to reform, does nothing to help the victims…or rather, potential future victims, which why we even have a list w/restrictions in the first place.
Comment by Why Tuesday, Mar 16, 21 @ 9:19 pm
=== Lessening the restrictions on sex offenders, statistically the hardest most problematic to reform, does nothing to help the victims…or rather, potential future victims===
You have it backwards my friend.
It has everything to do with preventing future victims.
An offender reintegrated in society is less likely to offend again.
Show us the evidence that residency restrictions work. I’ll wait.
Comment by 17% Solution Wednesday, Mar 17, 21 @ 6:40 am