Capitol Fax.com - Your Illinois News Radar


Latest Post | Last 10 Posts | Archives


Previous Post: *** UPDATED x5 *** SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - A few remap details
Next Post: *** UPDATED x2 *** Senate’s climate/energy bill currently on life support as Pritzker vows veto

Question of the day

Posted in:

* Background is here if you need it. Tribune

Gov. J.B. Pritzker on Friday endorsed ethics legislation that aims to take on Illinois’ pervasive culture of political corruption, but used his amendatory veto power to return it to the legislature to correct what he said was a confusing “technical drafting error” that prevented him from signing it into law.

“Passing real, lasting ethics reform was a top priority of mine going into the 2020 legislative session, and I’m pleased to move forward with an ethics package that includes a number of meaningful changes,” Pritzker said of the measure. […]

But Pritzker said a small provision “confuses and interferes” with the “clear authority” of the executive inspector general’s office to conduct investigations into wrongful conduct. He rewrote the measure to delete the provision.

It will take a simple majority of lawmakers to approve of Pritzker’s change when they reconvene for the fall veto session in October. But his actions could spur greater efforts among groups opposing the package who had sought a total veto in favor of tougher legislation.

* The Question: Do you agree with the governor’s limited AV or do you think he should’ve vetoed out more provisions or vetoed the whole thing? Take the poll and then explain your answer in comments, please…


polls

posted by Rich Miller
Monday, Aug 30, 21 @ 2:20 pm

Comments

  1. It’s a bit too technocratic for me to really weigh into the merits of his AV.

    But to be entirely cynical, I’d rather he not waste his political capital and relationships on ethics legislation that’ll never be much stronger than it is now, than all the other things we need to get done.

    Comment by Nick Monday, Aug 30, 21 @ 2:28 pm

  2. Should have been a fourth option: sign and let GA clean up the OEIG piece.

    Comment by Cannonball Monday, Aug 30, 21 @ 2:29 pm

  3. ===Should have been a fourth option===

    Yeah, but it’s too late now. lol

    Comment by Rich Miller Monday, Aug 30, 21 @ 2:36 pm

  4. Re-write to do right? I don’t think we want to go through that again.

    I agree with the Governor’s action. Nothing stopping the GA from going further.

    Comment by 47th Ward Monday, Aug 30, 21 @ 2:39 pm

  5. Voted “Agree”

    As is the prerogative of any governor, he did what was afforded to him to this legislation.

    The rest is on the legislature.

    Comment by Oswego Willy Monday, Aug 30, 21 @ 2:42 pm

  6. We agree with Mr/Ms Cannonball. Bill should have been signed. Most clear thinking people already know nearly all of the corruption now being prosecuted or promoted by Trum DOJ holdovers are either already crimes or not a crime in any form.

    Comment by Annonin' Monday, Aug 30, 21 @ 3:04 pm

  7. Voted “agree” don’t let perfect be the enemy of good.

    Comment by JS Mill Monday, Aug 30, 21 @ 3:10 pm

  8. As long as you don’t have to disclose familial relationship for family members who live in a separate address, the concept of ethics in this State is a joke

    Comment by Merica Monday, Aug 30, 21 @ 3:23 pm

  9. Voted agree for the same reason as JSMill @3:10pm–don’t let perfect be the enemy of good.

    Minor change that shouldn’t be an obstacle to approval, whereas wider changes or an outright veto would have left us with no progress (however small).

    Comment by Leslie K Monday, Aug 30, 21 @ 5:57 pm

  10. I personally would have liked to see a wider AV. A total veto isn’t really an option in this case. Regardless, the current AV does allow the Governor to demonstrate that he would like to see something more aggressive.

    Comment by Candy Dogood Monday, Aug 30, 21 @ 6:11 pm

  11. Agreed. Hoping he has read about the original intent of Amendatory Vetoes.

    Comment by Anyone Remember Monday, Aug 30, 21 @ 10:55 pm

  12. You take what you can get to move the goalposts a bit. Then try to move them a bit more next year.

    Comment by RNUG Tuesday, Aug 31, 21 @ 12:50 am

Add a comment

Sorry, comments are closed at this time.

Previous Post: *** UPDATED x5 *** SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - A few remap details
Next Post: *** UPDATED x2 *** Senate’s climate/energy bill currently on life support as Pritzker vows veto


Last 10 posts:

more Posts (Archives)

WordPress Mobile Edition available at alexking.org.

powered by WordPress.