Latest Post | Last 10 Posts | Archives
Previous Post: Back south
Next Post: Top Ten List
Posted in:
February 7, 2005
Dear Editor,Next week, the Illinois General Assembly will consider legislation to require government agencies to inform residents of any toxic substances in their water or soil. One might think our government is looking out for us already, but that hasn’t been the case.
Just ask Jana Bendik.
This brave, previously healthy Downers Grove teenager was diagnosed with non-Hodgkins lymphoma, a disease linked to toxic chemicals. For years, Jana cooked with, washed in and drank poisoned water. This tragedy is compounded by the awful fact that state government bureaucrats knew for 10 years about the toxic hazard in Bendik’s water, but never told her family.
A recent investigation showed that hidden toxins, hazardous materials, and medical waste products often seep into groundwater without local residents knowing about it. And there are countless toxic hot zones across Illinois in unsuspecting residents’ backyards.
That would change, though, under the proposed “Toxic Chemical Disclosure Act†(House Bill 290), the top environmental reform bill facing the General Assembly this session.
Sponsored by Rep. John Fritchey (D-Chicago), this reform would require the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency to use individualized notices, an easy-to-use online database, and newspaper announcements to warn citizens living within 2,500 feet of hazardous waste and toxic contaminants of their proximity to the deadly substances. Much of this information is already available to the public, but government bureaucrats have dropped the ball in getting the information out to those who need it most.
Thanks to our Illinois Constitution, the people of our state are among the only in the country to have an express right to live in a “healthful environmentâ€. The Toxic Chemical Disclosure Act is a commonsense way to help us carry out this fundamental constitutional mandate. No resident would be left in the dark about the poisons in their midst again.
If you agree with our fundamental right to know when there are deadly contaminants in the water we drink, cook with or bathe in, please visit our website www.CleanWater.il.gov and contact your state legislators to urge a “yes†vote on HB 290, the Toxic Chemical Disclosure Act.
Sincerely,
Pat Quinn
Illinois Lieutenant Governor
posted by Rich Miller
Monday, Feb 7, 05 @ 3:42 pm
Sorry, comments are closed at this time.
Previous Post: Back south
Next Post: Top Ten List
WordPress Mobile Edition available at alexking.org.
powered by WordPress.
Is it possible to govern Illinois without websites?
Just curious.
Comment by Anonymous Monday, Feb 7, 05 @ 3:45 pm
LOL. Good point.
Comment by Rich Miller Monday, Feb 7, 05 @ 3:52 pm
Oh, where do I start on this one…..
First off, the biggest (by far) portion of the problem by far has NOTHING to do with industrial toxins or waste. It’s contaminated private wells and/or failing private septic systems.
Secondly, that part which says “…living within 2,500 feet of hazardous waste and toxic contaminants…” - ok, but if you include pollution/toxic contaminants from private wells and septic systems, better plan on notifying virtually EVERYBODY living in unincorporated areas of the Northern, NW, West, SW, & South suburbs. And btw, there are any number of incorporated areas where substantial numbers of properties inside the corporations are still on private well & septic systems. Talk about ticking time bombs….
Thirdly, just as a btw, there was a ’study’ in MI last year on all the pollution problems comming from private well/setic systems in MI, and all the sudden they (the legislature) realized that there was something like 1.5 MILLION private well/septic systems out there (give or take a couple hundred thousand), and they figured inspecting them alone would average (at a minimum) around $225 per location. Time to ante up boys - who’s got that type of cash laying around.
Note: Boone County Health Department is a cheapie on doing well/septic inspections by comparison. They only cost around $150, with an added $25 for the lead test.
I’m sure that both IDPH & the local County Health Departments will just go totally apes**t over this proposed legislation.
Classic example of pandering to sensationalism instead of really trying to address the serious problems that do exist out there…..
Comment by Anonymous Tuesday, Feb 8, 05 @ 7:33 pm