Latest Post | Last 10 Posts | Archives
Previous Post: Rate John Milhiser’s first TV ad
Next Post: SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Supplement to today’s edition and a campaign roundup
Posted in:
* Derrick Blakley…
In the 2018 elections, 53% of the Illinois statewide vote came from women, with 28% of the total votes cast from suburban women.
“It’s white suburban women who need to take this issue very, very seriously when they cast a ballot. Which means them, their friends, their daughters their nieces and everyone else,” said Terry Cosgrove, executive director of Personal PAC, which supports pro-choice candidates.
Both sides in the abortion debate are using the prospect of overturning Roe v. Wade as a rallying cry for their voters.
“For those of us who are pro-life in Illinois, I think its a two-fold reaction,” said Mary Malone Rumley of Illinois Right to Life. “We’re absolutely thrilled that it’s looking like Roe is finally going to be overturned after 50 years. But we also know that this will impact Illinois greatly. We know that there are plenty on the pro-choice side who would like to see Illinois become an abortion oasis for the entire Midwest.”
* Dean Olsen…
The final Supreme Court decision is expected before the Nov. 8 general election. [Kent Redfield, emeritus professor of political science at University of Illinois Springfield] said the abortion debate could further energize a Republican base that generally supports abortion restrictions and is capitalizing on voter frustration with President Joe Biden and inflation.
Democratic politicians, whose base isn’t as enthusiastic, have more to gain if Roe falls and pro-choice voters want to prevent restrictions on abortion at the state and federal level, Redfield said.
In Illinois, where Democrats control state government, concern about preserving abortion rights could mitigate voters’ concerns about crime, he said.
“It will have a more positive effect overall, and it will affect Democratic turnout,” he said. “This is something that motivates younger voters, who are more likely to be pro-choice.”
* Michele Munz…
Vice President Kamala Harris met Thursday with abortion providers from some of the most restrictive states in the country, including Missouri, to learn how the Biden administration can help protect access to abortion amid a looming U.S. Supreme Court decision that could end the constitutional right to the procedure. […]
The St. Louis region is unique in that it straddles the two states — Republican-led Missouri, which has moved to restrict abortion access, and Democrat-led Illinois, which has worked to expand access.
Planned Parenthood of the St. Louis Region in 2019 opened an abortion clinic in Fairview Heights — just 15 minutes from its Missouri clinic. Over the years, the St. Louis clinic has become the only abortion provider in Missouri.
Since the Fairview Heights facility opened, abortions have become nearly nonexistent in Missouri. Patients can drive a bit farther to Illinois and avoid Missouri’s 72-hour mandatory waiting period, which requires two appointments three days apart for those seeking an abortion.
* Sarah Fentem…
At the Hope Clinic for Women in Granite City, the day starts early. Before the doors open at 7:30 a.m., clinic escorts and protesters take positions on opposite ends of the parking lot.
“You’ll remember this for the rest of your life!” one of the protesters shouts at the escorts. “Is it glorious to you [that] you’re participating in the death and destruction of babies?”
The escorts, volunteers from the activist group Pro-Choice Missouri, have started seeing a lot of patients who have traveled far to get to the Metro East clinic.
“I can see a Mississippi plate behind you right now,” escort Justine Collum said. Like the others, she’s clad in a rainbow vest and sometimes carries a large umbrella to shield patients from view.“
“I would say we’ve been seeing a lot of out-of-state plates lately,” she said. “There always have been some. But I would say it’s been an increase.”
Between 2014 and 2020, the state saw a more than 200% rise in abortion patients coming from out of state, a total of more than 9,000 abortions, according to data from the Illinois Department of Public Health.
In 2020, about two-thirds of those patients came from Missouri. They also come from other states that have also increased abortion restrictions in the past decade.
* Planned Parenthood press release…
Planned Parenthood of Illinois (PPIL) is proud to offer abortion pills through the mail to qualifying patients with an Illinois address. The FDA permanently removed in-person dispensing requirement for Mifepristone, also known as the abortion pill, in December 2021, allowing PPIL to launch this new program. With the Supreme Court expected to dismantle the legal protections afforded by Roe v. Wade this summer, this service is one more way PPIL is advancing health equity, breaking down unnecessary barriers to health care, and expanding access to underserved areas of the state.
“Now more than ever it’s crucial that our patients can access the care they need, when and where they need it,” said Dr. Amy Whitaker, Chief Medical Officer for PPIL. “There are over 20 years of data demonstrating the safety and effectiveness of medication abortion using Mifepristone. Not only is this a safe method, but it also increases access to care, especially for people of color, people living in rural areas, and people with low incomes who already face barriers to care.”
PPIL has been offering medication abortion via telehealth since 2021, however, patients needed to visit a physical health center to pick up the prescription. Starting mid-April 2022, patients can have the medication mailed to an Illinois address after they meet with a clinician via telehealth to determine whether they qualify. Mailing prescriptions directly to qualifying patients allows PPIL to expand capacity for patients who still require in-person services and for those who are forced to travel here from other states.
Out-of-state patients can still access medication abortion via telehealth, as long as they are traveling to Illinois for their video visit. They can then pick-up the medication in person at a PPIL health center.
* And Jesse Sullivan is fully embracing the abortion issue. Click the pic for a larger image…
* Related…
* Illinois rejoins federal Title X family planning program: Pritzker announced in August 2019, shortly after the policy took effect, that the state health department would no longer participate in the program while a number of other family planning service providers, including Planned Parenthood of Illinois and Aunt Martha’s Health and Wellness, said they would not comply with the new requirements. For the rest of that fiscal year, the state health department used General Revenue Fund money to fill in what was previously paid for by the federal government. The following year, the agency expanded the program with $5.8 million to fund Planned Parenthood, which had previously gotten its Title X money on its own, and other providers that weren’t previously part of the state’s Title X program.
posted by Rich Miller
Monday, May 23, 22 @ 10:39 am
Sorry, comments are closed at this time.
Previous Post: Rate John Milhiser’s first TV ad
Next Post: SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Supplement to today’s edition and a campaign roundup
WordPress Mobile Edition available at alexking.org.
powered by WordPress.
Can Sullivan’s narcissism override the emasculating drubbing his ego will take come primary night?
Time will tell.
Comment by Flyin' Elvis'-Utah Chapter Monday, May 23, 22 @ 10:43 am
>> “It will have a more positive effect overall, and it will affect Democratic turnout,” he said. “This is something that motivates younger voters, who are more likely to be pro-choice.”
This is something that did not use to be true - younger voters in the 2000s were not noticeably more pro-choice than older Americans - but today, yes, this is accurate. Just about every survey I see, shows that younger Americans have swung way more pro-choice in just the past four years. This is something the GOP is going to have to keep its eye on, everywhere. Though again it’s a little early to know, if this is a long-run trend.
Comment by ZC Monday, May 23, 22 @ 10:48 am
Bigger switch, Jesse Sullivan in college to Jesse Sullivan now, or Richard Irvin a decade ago to Richard Irvin now? At least Darren Bailey is… erm… consistent. As for the Sullivan flier (which I received in the mail), what choices about your body are you willing to let the women of Illinois decide on?
Comment by Ron Burgundy Monday, May 23, 22 @ 10:58 am
=We know that there are plenty on the pro-choice side who would like to see Illinois become an abortion oasis for the entire Midwest.=
Er, no. Not at all. That is simply a political banner. In reality, most who would prefer that Illinois not become a place where people from other states have to travel in order to receive abortions. Most would prefer access to abortion, a constitutional right that the U.S. Supreme Court literally enumerated in 1972 (see the Ninth Amendment), remain an enumerated human right for all women in the United States. Unfortunately, Illinois may well become a place of last resort (not, an “oasis”) for oppressed women in other states, should the currrent U.S. Supreme Court justices decide that the Tenth Amendment supersedes the Ninth Amendment (contrary to Madison’s foundational argument).
Comment by H-W Monday, May 23, 22 @ 11:03 am
==you’re participating in the death and destruction of babies==
Meanwhile Alabama doctors are turning away miscarrying patients (and jeopardizing their health) for fear of prison time.
Comment by Jocko Monday, May 23, 22 @ 11:08 am
**Richard Irvin a decade ago to Richard Irvin now**
How about Richard Irvin a year ago to Richard Irvin now?
Comment by SaulGoodman Monday, May 23, 22 @ 11:27 am
=who would like to see Illinois become an abortion oasis for the entire Midwest.”=
Not really. But, if the radical right would allow sex education and access to contraception for teenagers they would not need an abortion.
Comment by JS Mill Monday, May 23, 22 @ 11:51 am
well help us not to have an abortion oasis…which it is not to us….by pushing sex education, contraceptives, funding for baby formula and other early childhood needs, aid to those adopting and supporting infertility treatments. but we know that is folly because you don’t support all those things. We do.
Comment by Amalia Monday, May 23, 22 @ 1:01 pm
Wanted to add that CHOICES - Memphis Center for Reproductive Health is opening a clinic in Carbondale to serve patients from Tennessee, with intent to move fully if abortion is banned there.
Comment by Shibboleth Monday, May 23, 22 @ 1:05 pm
== Unfortunately, Illinois may well become a place of last resort (not, an “oasis”) for oppressed women in other states ==
Actually, I think oasis would be a good word for it. An oasis is the lone spot of water and vegetation in an ocean of barren sand/desert. If you consider most of the midwest to be a “desert” of abortion access and women’s rights, then Illinois is an “oasis” of both…one of the few places in the region that still supports it.
Comment by Scott Monday, May 23, 22 @ 1:06 pm
@ Scott — I have never been a fan of political banners. They tend to over-simplify social issues, and allow people to claim ignorance as a justification for supporting the banner’s superficial claims, even when those claim produce harms and inequalities. As you noted indirectly, this is not about abortion; it is about the rights of women to participate equally and fully in the “pursuit of (economic) happiness” (Originally, the English principle involved an equal entitlement to pursue property rights).
Alternatively, I dislike political banners because as history shows, Republicans have mastered the craft of creating banners in order to get lay people to act and vote against their own interests. I am simply not a fan of political banners and banner waiving.
Comment by H-W Monday, May 23, 22 @ 1:29 pm