Capitol Fax.com - Your Illinois News Radar

Money woes, spending blunders and a widely ignored state law

Posted in:

Illinois

* My weekly syndicated newspaper column…

State Rep. Tim Ozinga (R-Mokena) made the classic blunder of not focusing on one election at a time. But his flub does give us an excuse to look at a few fundraising issues.

It’s been no secret that Ozinga wanted to be the next House Republican leader. But he hasn’t really been involved in many House Republican races this year and then, the day before Election Day, all of a sudden reported giving his own campaign fund a million dollars.

As I pointed out to my newsletter subscribers last week, that money could’ve really helped some suburban or Downstate candidates who struggled to raise money and then lost. House Republican Leader Jim Durkin relied on the word of billionaire Ken Griffin that he’d have plenty of money for the fall campaign. But when Griffin left Illinois in a huff over rival billionaire Richard Uihlein opposing his efforts to nominate Republican Richard Irvin for governor, that commitment was discarded.

The Republicans’ fundraising base has badly eroded over the years. It has either aged out and/or moved to warmer climes and more hospitable politics, like Florida and Arizona. Once those folks leave, they just don’t care anymore (unless they’re getting paid, like Dan Proft, who spent millions of Uihlein’s money to help Darren Bailey). Adequate, reliable and younger replacements have not yet been found. Bailey winning the primary probably discouraged potential contributors from seeing a path to any significant wins this year.

This problematic fundraising trend has been going on for quite a few years. The wealthy Bruce Rauner exploited it to his own advantage by handing out money before, during and after his 2014 gubernatorial bid. After Rauner lost reelection and split for Florida, Griffin stepped in, until he lost the Irvin race and split for Florida.

So it’s either jump into the far-right political bed with Uihlein, or deal with the GOP’s stark fiscal reality and scramble every day to raise a few bucks here and there. It’s no wonder that Durkin retired. It’s just not worth the hassle.

Anyway, there is most definitely a void in the Republican Party structure that wealthy people like Ozinga can exploit, if only he had pitched in more during the last election instead of waiting to plunk down cash during the leadership race.

And while billionaire Uihlein didn’t give money to Durkin, he did fund a group called Common Sense Reforms independent expenditure committee. As I’ve told you before, it’s run by some Illinois Policy Institute honchos, including John Tillman.

According to a State Board of Elections website search, the group reported spending $1.9 million since early October.

Uihlein used the group in much the same way he helped Bailey through Proft’s independent expenditure committee, People Who Play by the Rules PAC. He gave a few bucks to Bailey, but most of his cash went to Proft.

Instead of concentrating the Uihlein cash on some winnable races, though, Common Sense Reforms scattered the spending among 18 House contests, with almost all of the districts receiving about the same amount of mail. I’m not sure if their spending was enough to move the needle in any individual races, but Uihlein and Tillman might have created some good will among the very small handful who won.

And, finally, a recent complaint filed against Senate Republican Leader Dan McConchie’s campaign highlights a campaign finance law that’s being almost completely ignored in Illinois.

State law requires any candidates who receive 33% of their funding from a single person or group to disclose the name of the “sponsoring entity” on their state paperwork.

In McConchie’s case, the sponsoring entity was Uihlein, who contributed $2.1 million to McConchie’s personal campaign committee in the third quarter, or 78% of his total.

A spokesperson for the Board of Elections says that candidates don’t have to disclose their sponsoring entities on their “paid for by” advertising disclaimers, although one attorney I consulted disagrees.

But just think of all the candidates with sponsoring entities this year who didn’t disclose it. Irvin received tens of millions of dollars from Griffin. Uihlein has been Bailey’s sponsoring entity all year long. Kari Steele’s Democratic primary bid for Cook County assessor was almost totally funded by the Operating Engineers Local 150-connected Fight Back Fund’s million-dollar contribution.

Strengthening the law to make clear that campaigns have to disclose their sponsors in their advertising probably wouldn’t work. Uihlein and Proft could’ve just set up an entity called “I love Darren Bailey,” or something. Money always seems to find a way around regulations.

posted by Rich Miller
Monday, Nov 14, 22 @ 9:19 am

Comments

== Money always seems to find a way around regulations. ==

As long as elected officials are the ones who have to decide whether and how elected officials get punished…

Comment by Homebody Monday, Nov 14, 22 @ 9:42 am
It seems a pretty simple matter to say that “I Love Darren Bailey PAC” would be disclosed as “Richard Uhlein” if the committee received more than 1/3 of its support from Richard Uhlein, and if you ever get to the point where it’s a “Dark Money Group” just say “Paid for by Unregulated Dark Money.”

In fact, maybe we should do away with the game of coming up with pretty names for dark money groups and just require them to put “Paid for by unregulated Dark Money” with a skull and cross bones on all of the ads, kinda like the Surgeon General’s warning.

Comment by Juvenal Monday, Nov 14, 22 @ 10:31 am
Good summary of what may be the future of the Republican Party.
Still thinking new leadership, dumping the consultants they used and some attractive candidates could turn things around.
Agree things look pretty dim, but I would not count the Republicans out.
If you are a young moderate Republican who is looking to move up in the Republican Party, the wing nuts, loser consultants and foolish contributors that dominated this last election have basically cleaned out a path to step up and take back the party.

Comment by Back to the Future Monday, Nov 14, 22 @ 1:06 pm
I did a quick look through the Election Code and the Admin Rules, but couldn’t find the section requiring the ‘paid for by’; maybe it’s Federal (?)
And I love Juvenal - Monday, Nov 14, 22 @ 10:31 am’s “Paid for by unregulated Dark Money/Skull and Crossbones” idea.

Comment by thisjustinagain Monday, Nov 14, 22 @ 1:19 pm
thisjustinagain — its in the IL Election Code:

(10 ILCS 5/9-3) (from Ch. 46, par. 9-3)

For purposes of this Section, a “sponsoring entity” is (i) any person, organization, corporation, or association that contributes at least 33% of the total funding of the political committee or (ii) any person or other entity that is registered or is required to register under the Lobbyist Registration Act and contributes at least 33% of the total funding of the political committee.

Comment by JoeMaddon Monday, Nov 14, 22 @ 1:24 pm