Capitol Fax.com - Your Illinois News Radar


Latest Post | Last 10 Posts | Archives


Previous Post: Live coverage
Next Post: Open thread

Isabel’s morning briefing

Posted in:

* Here you go…

posted by Isabel Miller
Wednesday, Jul 19, 23 @ 7:28 am

Comments

  1. ===Block Club | Police Oversight Agency Says It Can’t Find Migrants Who Were Allegedly Sexually Abused By Cops===

    From the reporting…

    ===“There can be profound and sometimes impenetrable barriers, which prevent survivors of sexual misconduct from recording their experiences or participating in our systems of justice,” Kersten said. “These barriers are often magnified when an act of sexual misconduct is perpetrated by a person in a position of trust, such as a police officer.”===

    This quote and statement isn’t an exoneration of any alleged wrongdoing that hasn’t existed, nor is it an indictment either that anything happened.

    What it is, sadly, is a harsh reminder of the police culture from within their ranks and perception other may have, as stated in that quote.

    Comment by Oswego Willy Wednesday, Jul 19, 23 @ 8:08 am

  2. ==Tyler Heleine, the Coles County Chief Deputy, doesn’t think this is the right move and wants to see more work done. ==

    The decision has been made. The Court has ruled. Move on and implement it. If you’ve not already been preparing to do so because you “hoped” for a certain outcome then shame on you. You aren’t a very good leader.

    Comment by Demoralized Wednesday, Jul 19, 23 @ 8:25 am

  3. -lie down on the steps of the Supreme Court and tell the Supreme Court-

    It’s about winning elections and putting justices on the court that agree with your judicial philosophy. Now that the Harvard opinion is out: it doesn’t seem to be too unpopular.

    Comment by Steve Wednesday, Jul 19, 23 @ 9:11 am

  4. ===Now that the Harvard opinion is out===

    If the result of that opinion is lawsuits filed against lots of universities and colleges which don’t subsequently reduce Black enrollment, that’ll likely change.

    Comment by Rich Miller Wednesday, Jul 19, 23 @ 9:14 am

  5. ===it doesn’t seem to be too unpopular===

    What do you base that on?

    As a harsh example Charles Barkley is now more involved in scholarships for POC students wanting to attend Auburn, because Barkley knows that it’ll be popular at schools like Auburn to disenfranchise attendance at universities that don’t even reflect the diversity of its state.

    From BET

    https://www.bet.com/article/epi3rn/charles-barkley-will-auburn-university-affirmative-action

    ===In my will, I am leaving Auburn $5 million,” Barkley said Friday, according to AL.com. “I’m going to change it to be just for scholarships for Black students. That’s just my way of trying to make sure Auburn stays diverse.”

    “I love Auburn,” he added. “I’ve actually changed it to be used for kids from poor homes. But after that ruling yesterday, my phone was blowing up. I was talking to my friends and said, ‘I need to make sure Black folks always have a place at Auburn. So, I’m gonna change my will and make it exclusive for Black students—all $5 million.’ It’s just for me the right thing to do. I always want to make sure that Auburn’s diverse.”===

    If you can cite that’s not that unpopular, why is there such worry?

    Comment by Oswego Willy Wednesday, Jul 19, 23 @ 9:20 am

  6. I don’t think a fine is going to dissuade Alderman Gardiner when the FBI claimed he accepted $5,000 in a bag from a developer who wanted him to harass another developer.

    Comment by Big Dipper Wednesday, Jul 19, 23 @ 9:24 am

  7. = If you’ve not already been preparing to do so because you “hoped” for a certain outcome then shame on you. You aren’t a very good leader. =

    This exactly. You plan for ALL scenarios, what you don’t want to happen as well as what you do. Don’t sit on your duff, get caught flat-footed, and then whine about it.

    These SAs who knew this was a possible (even probable) decision and didn’t prepare for it have no business complaining.

    Comment by JoanP Wednesday, Jul 19, 23 @ 9:44 am

  8. -What do you base that on?-

    I based it on this polls.

    https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/americans-approve-supreme-court-decision-restricting-race-college/story?id=100580375&cid=social_twitter_abcn

    https://www.wcvb.com/article/affirmative-action-supreme-court-national-poll-harvard-unc/44298993#

    https://docs.cdn.yougov.com/kpnwbn3sup/econTabReport.pdf#page46

    Comment by Steve Wednesday, Jul 19, 23 @ 10:15 am

  9. ===I based it on this polls.===

    The splits of party

    ===A majority of Republicans (75%) and independents (58%) approve of the ruling, while a distinct minority of Democrats approve (26%).===

    Don’t you think racial makeup of the parties is a factor, and further the idea of “angry white” but not Republican, that’s not a thing either?

    If anything, it’s the polarization of popularity to a policy that can’t be implemented in the military academies, as cited in the ruling, why is that, the academies are exempt?

    I think - John Lopez - put it best about “popularity and USSC ruling…

    ===It’s the end of June, and last year and this year, been memorable thanks to the U.S. Supreme Court:

    Roe v Wade = GONE
    Affirmative Action = GONE
    Student Loan Forgiveness = GONE
    Constitutional Carry = SECURED
    Business Religious Freedom = SECURED

    Yes, it’s been a great 2 years for freedom and right to life of the unborn.===

    … because I can’t imagine any Republican that wants to win in a competitive district running on this list.

    Comment by Oswego Willy Wednesday, Jul 19, 23 @ 10:28 am

Add a comment

Sorry, comments are closed at this time.

Previous Post: Live coverage
Next Post: Open thread


Last 10 posts:

more Posts (Archives)

WordPress Mobile Edition available at alexking.org.

powered by WordPress.