Capitol Fax.com - Your Illinois News Radar


Latest Post | Last 10 Posts | Archives


Previous Post: Live coverage
Next Post: Open thread

Isabel’s morning briefing

Posted in:

* Here you go…

posted by Isabel Miller
Monday, Jul 31, 23 @ 7:35 am

Comments

  1. === The best argument against collective bargaining for government workers is that no one represents taxpayers ===

    This sort of bad-faith nonsense is another example of the right wing’s core belief that the millions of tax-paying citizens who voted for Pritzker somehow don’t count.

    Comment by ChicagoVinny Monday, Jul 31, 23 @ 8:13 am

  2. ===This sort of bad-faith nonsense===

    Ball game.

    In actuality, which is also the part that these folks won’t accept, labor IS a partner, not an enemy, and those in labor are taxpayers too

    Vilifying is the goal of the exercise.

    Comment by Oswego Willy Monday, Jul 31, 23 @ 8:21 am

  3. Can’t read the WSJ article because of the paywall but the beginning is all I need to know. It’s nonsense. Voters had a choice last time in Bailey and they soundly rejected that choice. Like it wasn’t even close.

    Comment by DHS Drone Monday, Jul 31, 23 @ 8:27 am

  4. “The best argument against collective bargaining for government workers is that no one represents taxpayers.”

    Usually you don’t open your case by letting everyone know how weak it is, but what do I know, I’m not one of the raving lunatics on the WSJ editorial board.

    Comment by Larry Bowa Jr. Monday, Jul 31, 23 @ 8:34 am

  5. Opioid safe-use sites. No. Just no.

    Comment by CJA Monday, Jul 31, 23 @ 8:49 am

  6. =whopping=

    Yeah, that incredible 4%. Such a scandal.

    Now tell me about corporate profits and Wall Street exec compensation.

    Exactly.

    Comment by JS Mill Monday, Jul 31, 23 @ 9:10 am

  7. Inflation since 2019 is 19.34 percent. An average of 4.52 percent. So workers lose again. That should make the WSJ happy.

    Comment by very old soil Monday, Jul 31, 23 @ 9:42 am

  8. “Union chiefs and the politicians they support sit on both sides of the bargaining table.”

    Did Rauner write this? 2015 called and wants its propaganda back.

    Did the WSJ write this with a straight face, after billionaire donors helped it get an unearned annual 40% corporate tax cut that does not have to be renegotiated every four years? Unions like AFSCME have to negotiate for single-digit annual raises. Too bad unions can’t be like billionaire right wing donors and just give money to politicians and skip the negotiation process. /s

    Comment by Grandson of Man Monday, Jul 31, 23 @ 9:58 am

  9. “signed a whopping new contract…The contract covers the next four years and gives 35,000 public workers 19.28% raises”

    Somehow I suspect that the WSJ editorial page writers and editors got more than 4.4% raises per year and would raise hold hell otherwise. Kind of kills their limited credibility when they throw out nonsense like that and whoppers like: “under previous Governor Bruce Rauner. (Remember when a Governor tried to represent taxpayers?)”

    Man, it must really gall the Journal Editorial page how much Illinois likes JB and loathed Rauner and Bailey.

    Comment by New Day Monday, Jul 31, 23 @ 11:00 am

  10. Who represents the taxpayers when Supreme Court justices are taking on fancy hunting trips and vacations by Individuals and Organizations with business before the court? What about when ALEC or the Defense companies are writing legislation?

    Comment by Chicago Blue Monday, Jul 31, 23 @ 1:27 pm

Add a comment

Sorry, comments are closed at this time.

Previous Post: Live coverage
Next Post: Open thread


Last 10 posts:

more Posts (Archives)

WordPress Mobile Edition available at alexking.org.

powered by WordPress.