Latest Post | Last 10 Posts | Archives
Previous Post: Undergraduate enrollment strong across Illinois
Next Post: Giannoulias testifies to US Senate committee about book bans, denies political motivation, sends follow-up fundraising email
Posted in:
* I hate to complain too much because the Better Government Association’s David Greising has finally come around to reality on a constitutional amendment for pension “reform”…
The Civic Committee and others — including me — have argued in the past for a constitutional amendment that might enable some renegotiation of retirement benefits. The state has other obligations to residents that sometimes might trump commitments it made to its retired workers, the thinking goes.
But Pritzker opposes an amendment, and he says he couldn’t pass one even if he tried. I have come to believe pension reform can be accomplished without a constitutional amendment. And one of the most interesting features of the Civic Committee plan is that this stalwart of the Chicago business community has also stopped calling for a pension amendment.
The Civic Committee’s plan relies on expanding the sales tax to services, which has gone nowhere in the past, but is still somewhat more realistic than changing the state constitution to reduce future pension benefits (which it may not be allowed to do anyway). They’ve also proposed jacking up the income tax by half a point on individuals and 0.7 percent on corporations, after having staunchly opposed a graduated income tax. Convincing Illinoisans to pay more money in taxes to fund public employee pension systems would be a very heavy lift.
* The real problem is this continued belief that pensions are still a main driver of state spending…
Illinois’ $50.4 billion budget this year is up 26% from Pritzker’s first budget, passed in 2019.
One of the biggest factors behind that increase: pensions, of course.
Pension payments in Gov. Pritzker’s first budget (FY20) totaled $8.113 billion. The FY24 appropriations plan budgets $10.135 billion, a 25 percent increase - slightly below the rest of the state’s budget growth. It’s not some outsized burden.
More importantly, pension payments represented 20.2 percent of base state expenditures in the FY20 budget as passed, and 20.1 percent of base state expenditures in the current budget. High? Yes. Manageable? Yes.
Greising also mentions pension bonds. Pension obligation and acceleration bond payments have fallen from $1.6 billion in Fiscal Year 2017 to $1.024 billion in FY24. Adjusted for inflation, the $1.6 billion FY17 payment would be $1.998 billion today, so that particular spending item has dropped almost by half in real dollars.
posted by Rich Miller
Tuesday, Sep 12, 23 @ 11:13 am
Sorry, comments are closed at this time.
Previous Post: Undergraduate enrollment strong across Illinois
Next Post: Giannoulias testifies to US Senate committee about book bans, denies political motivation, sends follow-up fundraising email
WordPress Mobile Edition available at alexking.org.
powered by WordPress.
Re cutting benefits owed, perhaps Greising became tired of serious people laughing at him.
Comment by Big Dipper Tuesday, Sep 12, 23 @ 11:33 am
Finally some reality. The pension obligations are painful but manageable. They will continue to be painful but manageable until 2045 when they will become barely a drop in the state budget. Oh, to be a lawmaker or governor when you suddenly have an extra 15 billion to spend.
Comment by New Day Tuesday, Sep 12, 23 @ 11:41 am
He needs to read Article I, Section 10, Clause 1 of the United States Constitution, aka the contracts clause.
Comment by Davos Tuesday, Sep 12, 23 @ 11:47 am
Convincing Illinoisans to pay more money in taxes to fund public employee pension systems would be a very heavy lift.
Well said, and noted.
Comment by It's always Sunny in Illinois Tuesday, Sep 12, 23 @ 11:51 am
I’m no longer as certain that this 6 to 3, and possibly future 7 to 2 SCOTUS, won’t be able to find a way around the contracts clause for pensions.
Comment by Anotheretiree Tuesday, Sep 12, 23 @ 11:51 am
Pension debt is manageable and no need to keep freaking out, oof. Not what the Illinois doomsayers want to hear.
Comment by Grandson of Man Tuesday, Sep 12, 23 @ 11:52 am
I always felt that a 5-4 SCOTUS that could conjure up a ruling like Bush v. Gore could find a public sector pension carve out to the contracts clause. So yes, I too agree that the current court would wholeheartedly embrace a police power argument or some such exotic theory. Put differently, when’s the last time SCOTUS handed down a major pro-union opinion?
Comment by How Could Jerry Not Say Hello? Tuesday, Sep 12, 23 @ 12:28 pm
===when’s the last time SCOTUS===
This is a state issue about the state constitution that doesn’t conflict with the US Constitution.
Move along.
Comment by Rich Miller Tuesday, Sep 12, 23 @ 12:29 pm
Pension reform is done and over with. Tier 2 save the state over $500 million and growing every year.
The good news is that the ever decreasing influence (if it can even be referred to in that manner anymore) of the ilgop means that it is dead legislatively. Plus the ilgop has moved on to more pressing matters of drag shows and litter boxes.
Comment by JS Mill Tuesday, Sep 12, 23 @ 12:29 pm
== Plus the ilgop has moved on to more pressing matters of drag shows and litter boxes==
If only. The IPI is recruiting GOP legislative candidates with the number one goal of amending the Pension Clause.
Comment by Big Dipper Tuesday, Sep 12, 23 @ 12:37 pm
And sadly, this is also a Tier 1 issue and the Tier 1’s are dying off. So the grand pension total, after the Tier 1’s leave this planet, won’t be anywhere what is calculated. It will be a lot less.
But on the flip side, a bad pension plan (Tier 2) and lower paying jobs than the private sector has does not equal a bright future for a State employee work force that the citizens will need.
As usual, you will get what you pay for.
Comment by Appears Tuesday, Sep 12, 23 @ 12:44 pm
It just angers me to no end that there are those out there that would reduce or take away my pension that I worked faithfully for 23 years for. I will have contributed every paycheck for it. I’m tier II so I already will get a lot less than those folks just 3 years prior. But I’m so thankful for it.
Why do these folks want to hurt regular faithful employees of the state like me.
I know that some are giving up on it
But they’d return to it in a second if they thought they had a chance.
I don’t understand how they could be so heartless and cruel to public servants faithfully working to better the state.
Comment by Honeybear Tuesday, Sep 12, 23 @ 12:50 pm
“The IPI is recruiting GOP legislative candidates”
Democrats can only wish for the super-minority party to push anti-worker positions, seeing how popular they are even in red districts that voted for the WRA.
Comment by Grandson of Man Tuesday, Sep 12, 23 @ 1:04 pm
=The IPI is recruiting GOP legislative candidates=
I am not concerned in the least. The ilgop hasn’t had a statewide elected official in two election cycles now and nobody was even remotely close in the last cycle. On the legislative side, they are so far behind the Webb Space Telescope (or whatever it is) cannot find them. They continue to run on issues that are absolute losers. Not only do they not seem to care, they seem to celebrate the fact that they are running on these loser issues.
If this was a high school football game the ilgop would be operating with a perpetual running clock.
Comment by JS Mill Tuesday, Sep 12, 23 @ 1:08 pm
===I worked faithfully for 23 years for. I will have contributed every paycheck for it. I’m tier II===
23 years of work seems to indicate that you started in the year 2000, but Tier 2 did not start until 2011. Does the 23 years include time in a different system? I have always wondered what happens if a Tier 1 employee gets a job under a different system after 2011 (e.g., Tier 1 SURS moves to TRS). Is that what happened in your case, and do you get some Tier 1 and some Tier 2 or does it all move to Tier 2?
Comment by thechampaignlife Tuesday, Sep 12, 23 @ 1:19 pm
My bad. Poorly written, when I retire in 2037 I will have worked 23 years. I started in 2014
Comment by Honeybear Tuesday, Sep 12, 23 @ 1:23 pm
==Is that what happened in your case, and do you get some Tier 1 and some Tier 2 or does it all move to Tier 2?==
It should all be tier 1. If you start in tier 1, you are always in tier 1. I don’t understand this comment either.
Comment by Travel Guy Tuesday, Sep 12, 23 @ 1:25 pm
Honeybear, they are not trying to reduce Tier II. They pretend it never happened. I’m sure if pressed they would admit that they love Tier II as it is worse than Social Security.
Comment by Big Dipper Tuesday, Sep 12, 23 @ 1:45 pm
Appears- Please, don’t kill us Tier 1 people off just yet. I’m hoping to get a few more checks before I disappear for good.
Comment by Friendly Bob Adams Tuesday, Sep 12, 23 @ 1:53 pm
=I have always wondered what happens if a Tier 1 employee gets a job under a different system after 2011 (e.g., Tier 1 SURS moves to TRS).=
There’s a Pension Reciprocity System that I believe covers ALL of the systems which were affected by the Tier 2 revisions. You need to be vested in at least one system to be eligible for any pension. If you started out under one system as Tier 1, and then moved to another system under Tier 2, you would need to go back to the first system and get vested in order to get a Tier 1 pension. If you stayed in the second system and got vested in Tier 2, the reciprocal agreement allows you to append those un-vested years (in only whole-year increments) to the Tier 2 pension you’ve become vested in.
In a former job under one of the affected systems, I was told by a couple of co-workers (who started employment there in the Tier 2 era) that they were safely in Tier 1 because they did a couple days of substitute teaching back in 2010, etc,. If my read on the rules is correct, however, they would need to have been vested in TRS in order to get Tier 1.
Comment by Scooter Tuesday, Sep 12, 23 @ 1:58 pm
==And sadly, this is also a Tier 1 issue and the Tier 1’s are dying off. So the grand pension total, after the Tier 1’s leave this planet, won’t be anywhere what is calculated. It will be a lot less.==
Can someone explain this? Isn’t life expectancy calculated into the projected pension costs?
Comment by supplied_demand Tuesday, Sep 12, 23 @ 2:02 pm
Here’s the missing piece: the “savings” from the move to Tier 2 is at least partly fictional. Especially for the teachers, benefits were cut so much (backroom deal, no actuaries) that it is generally agreed that there will be boosts eventually, both to avoid lawsuits and because eventually those younger teachers will have more service and more clout. (To be sure, the biggest losers in the new system are those who only teach for a short time, who will never have political clout, so that will be more a matter of recruiting troubles. Best case is that the public school student population keeps dropping so that we need to hire fewer teachers to teach fewer kids.)
Comment by Jane Tuesday, Sep 12, 23 @ 2:13 pm
-won’t be able to find a way around the contracts clause for pensions.-
No one should have standing in federal court for state pensions if you believe in federalism
Comment by Steve Tuesday, Sep 12, 23 @ 2:14 pm
=== There’s a Pension Reciprocity System that I believe covers ALL of the systems which were affected by the Tier 2 revisions. ===
Except the judges system. All new judges are Tier 2 even if they were Tier 1 with a previous employer.
Comment by Hannibal Lecter Tuesday, Sep 12, 23 @ 2:14 pm
The Civic Committee helped kill the 2020 tax proposal from the GA that lowered the tax rate on poor people because they were waiting for their chance to propose their own tax plan that raises rates on poor people? And that new revenue is supposed to go to…pensions?
Why?
Comment by Who else Tuesday, Sep 12, 23 @ 2:16 pm
The problem is not just cutting the befits of current and soon-to-be-0retirees. The issue is also what will be done with the savings? If the State will use the saved money to shower more incentives on tech giants and EV manufacturers (who can pack up and leave on a moment’s notice and leave hulking abandoned warehouses and plants in their wake), it doesn’t sound like a good use of the money.
Comment by Ares Tuesday, Sep 12, 23 @ 2:39 pm
==shower more incentives on tech giants and EV manufacturers (who can pack up and leave on a moment’s notice and leave hulking abandoned warehouses and plants in their wake)==
If they do that, they don’t get the incentives.
Comment by supplied_demand Tuesday, Sep 12, 23 @ 2:57 pm
“…a bad pension plan (Tier 2) and lower paying jobs than the private sector has does not equal a bright future for a State employee work force that the citizens will need.” I believe that public employee salaries did not start exceeding private sector jobs until the 1970s, 200 years after the Declaration was signed in 1776. My father and I have no fixed pension. Most GenXers I know have no fixed pension, unless they were in the military.
“…you will get what you pay for.” I grew up with tons of Chicago Machine families and remember many conversations about how their father/uncle/cousin was a fireman and only had to work three days per week, so they could have a side job painting or laying carpet. The Daley Machine was never about working too hard.
Comment by Payback Tuesday, Sep 12, 23 @ 3:28 pm
Those firemen probably worked 3 days on a week on a 24 hours system. Which means they were at the station the entire time on the designated days. And ready to fight a fire at any moment in those 24 hours. Such schedules were chosen to minimize shift changes and reduce the chance for confusion during same.
Of course such a schedule will allow for a side gig. And I see nothing scurrilous in that.
Comment by cermak_rd Tuesday, Sep 12, 23 @ 3:46 pm
=== A solution in search of a crisis ===
More like an organization in search of a reason for existing.
Or an executive director in search of a paycheck.
When did Chicagoland’s premiere public corruption fighter decide to start wading into partisan budget battles. Always landing on the side of wealthy Chicago corporate interests?
I think it was right around the time that Andy Shaw took the helm and gave himself a lavish compensation increase that included a gym membership at the East Bank Club.
The BGA should hang a sign around their neck that says “For Rent.”
Comment by Marco Polo Tuesday, Sep 12, 23 @ 3:49 pm
Honey Bear - were you able to buy any of your military time?
Comment by Huh? Tuesday, Sep 12, 23 @ 4:05 pm
== pension payments represented 20.2 percent of base state expenditures in the FY20 budget as passed, and 20.1 percent of base state expenditures in the current budget. ==
Then let’s just lock that into law (or heck, into the constitution) until the debt is paid off. Tie the pension payment to a static portion of GRF, like 20 percent, rather than the somewhat arbitrary dollar figures in the ramp. That way pension payments will cause less of a crowding-out effect when revenue dips and we would automatically make higher payments when the state experiences a revenue boost.
Comment by Telly Tuesday, Sep 12, 23 @ 4:06 pm
“Those firemen probably worked 3 days on a week on a 24 hours system.”
Still do, in suburban Depts as well. Red, Black, Gold shifts.
Comment by Proud Sucker Tuesday, Sep 12, 23 @ 4:36 pm