Latest Post | Last 10 Posts | Archives
Previous Post: Asylum-seeker coverage roundup
Next Post: Five dead after crash involving semi-truck carrying anhydrous ammonia
Posted in:
* Illinois State Police…
People can now submit an endorsement affidavit online for assault weapons, assault weapon attachments, .50 caliber rifles, and .50 caliber cartridges. On January 10, 2023, Governor JB Pritzker signed into law Public Act 102-1116, the Protect Illinois Communities Act, regulating the sale and distribution of these items in Illinois, along with large capacity ammunition feeding devices. The Act went into effect immediately upon signing. Individuals who possessed assault weapons, assault weapon attachments, .50 caliber rifles, and .50 caliber cartridges before the Act took effect are required to submit an endorsement affidavit through their Firearm Owner’s Identification (FOID) Card account prior to January 1, 2024. Large capacity ammunition feeding devices are regulated, but do not require and endorsement affidavit.
As of October 1, 2023, individuals are able to submit their endorsement affidavits online. Affidavits must be submitted online through a FOID Card account. Individuals can access their FOID Card account from the ISP Firearms Services Bureau website, or going directly to www.ispfsb.com/Public/Login.aspx. If you have forgotten your username or password, links on the login page will help you recover or reset your information. The same Firearms Service Bureau links can be used to create an account for those who do not have one. You will need an email address, and driver’s license or State ID to create an account. A tutorial video on how to create an account can be found on the ISP FOID webpage under Application Help.
A tutorial video on how to submit an endorsement affidavit through your FOID account is also available on the ISP website and can be found on the Protect Illinois Communities Act, Regulation on Assault Weapons page. Individuals who need help submitting an endorsement affidavit can refer to the Frequently Asked Questions page or visit one of the ISP FOID Kiosks, both of which can be found on the ISP website at https://isp.illinois.gov/Home/AssaultWeapons.
Do not bring your weapon, ammunition, or accessories if you visit a Kiosk.
* Daily Herald…
The affidavits must include the applicant’s name, date of birth and FOID card number, along with the make, model, caliber, and serial number of each weapon, and a statement testifying that they own a locking mechanism for the weapon.
Stating false information on the affidavit could lead to a charge of perjury, under the new law.
The ban, passed during the General Assembly’s lame duck session and signed it into law by Gov. J.B. Pritzker in January, has prompted several lawsuits alleging it violates the Second Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.
A federal judge in the Southern District of Illinois ruled that it did, but two other judges in the Northern District rejected the claims. Those cases are now pending before the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals in Chicago.
* Sun-Times…
Guns won’t be confiscated as a result of the new law, but the registration affidavit is still required.
The Protect Illinois Communities Act took effect immediately when Pritzker signed the bill Jan. 10 and has spurred a flurry of court challenges since then. The Illinois Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of the law in a 4-3 vote last month following a lawsuit filed by state Rep. Dan Caulkins, R-Decatur.
Opponents of the law have vowed to seek out avenues in federal court to challenge it once again.
“Pritzker and Illinois Democrats have criminalized hundreds of thousands of legal gun owners,” Caulkins told the Chicago Sun-Times after the state Supreme Court ruling, adding he’s confident the ban “will eventually be overturned” in federal court.
* Tribune…
State police said there are roughly 2.4 million FOID card holders in Illinois. It’s not known how many people possess guns that are now banned but would be grandfathered in under the law. […]
A federal challenge on Second Amendment grounds is pending before a federal appeals court in Chicago. The ban has withstood state lawsuits, with the Illinois Supreme Court upholding the law in August.
How the law’s gun registration requirements will be enforced remains to be seen. Earlier this year, an estimated 90 of Illinois’ 102 county sheriffs issued letters stating they “believe that (the new gun law) is a clear violation of the 2nd Amendment to the U.S. Constitution” and that they wouldn’t enforce it. […]
Also, devices that increase the firing rates of a firearm, known as “switches,” to convert them from semi-automatic or automatic weapons, are covered by the ban. Someone in possession could face a felony count for each device.
posted by Isabel Miller
Monday, Oct 2, 23 @ 11:25 am
Sorry, comments are closed at this time.
Previous Post: Asylum-seeker coverage roundup
Next Post: Five dead after crash involving semi-truck carrying anhydrous ammonia
WordPress Mobile Edition available at alexking.org.
powered by WordPress.
Registration is a prelude to confiscation. Discuss.
Being forced to disclose one’s (now) illegal firearms is an affront to the 2nd and 5th amendments to the US Constitution. Discuss.
Comment by We've never had one before Monday, Oct 2, 23 @ 11:47 am
===Registration is a prelude to confiscation. Discuss.
Being forced to disclose one’s (now) illegal firearms is an affront to the 2nd and 5th amendments to the US Constitution. Discuss.===
However…
===Guns won’t be confiscated as a result of the new law, but the registration affidavit is still required.===
If you’d like to discuss this part, that is better than merely driving by and asking others to participate
Comment by Oswego Willy Monday, Oct 2, 23 @ 11:52 am
===Registration is a prelude to confiscation. Discuss.
Being forced to disclose one’s (now) illegal firearms is an affront to the 2nd and 5th amendments to the US Constitution. Discuss.===
Also, the sky is falling. Discuss /s
Comment by Nick Name Monday, Oct 2, 23 @ 12:03 pm
Will armed citizens comply?
Will they resist?
Will local police enforce the law?
(Insert dun-dun-dunnn-duh meme here)
On the plus side, with no cash bail, anyone charged for violating this law will not have to post bond. So there’s that.
Comment by 47th Ward Monday, Oct 2, 23 @ 12:04 pm
With the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals reviewing this law, privacy-minded legal owners of modern sporting rifles ( this is the accurate industry definition BTW) would be wise to wait until the very last day or until the court rules.
Comment by Donnie Elgin Monday, Oct 2, 23 @ 12:11 pm
More laws that only the law-abiding will acknowledge, only caters to those that think commotion equals progress.
Comment by Wading in... Monday, Oct 2, 23 @ 12:21 pm
If you own a gun you are part of “a well-regulated Militia”. The guv’mint has every Right to know who is in the Militia, and where they are in case they need them to fight off the Indians (and Slaves).
Discuss.
Comment by Jerry Monday, Oct 2, 23 @ 12:24 pm
Rightists seem to think that “marriage” is a “Right”. Its not. Yet they are required to be registered (and Rightists insist on it).
Discuss.
Comment by Jerry Monday, Oct 2, 23 @ 12:27 pm
==More laws that only the law-abiding will acknowledge, only caters to those that think commotion equals progress.==
And breaking these law allows judges to put people in prison longer. Isn’t that what the NRA and gun advocates say they want?
Comment by Anonymous Monday, Oct 2, 23 @ 12:27 pm
Births and Deaths are required to be registered.
Discuss.
Comment by Jerry Monday, Oct 2, 23 @ 12:27 pm
Compliance rates with similar registration laws in other states (7 plus the Disteict of Columbia) have been estimated to be well below 50%. Additionally, the private data from those registries has been leaked, most recently in California, in which case the private info of everyone who applied for a permit from the past 10 years was leaked along with all current permit holders. This does not bode well for anyone considering compliance in Illinois.
Comment by Former ILSIP Monday, Oct 2, 23 @ 12:31 pm
So if this is all things that only punish law abiding citizens….why did the number of mass shootings decrease in this country the last time we had a ban…it should not have had any impact. Right? Discuss.
Comment by DTownResident Monday, Oct 2, 23 @ 12:36 pm
Automobiles are required to be registered, and they aren’t even mentioned in the U.S. Constitution.
For all you constitutional originalists, discuss.
Comment by Steve Rogers Monday, Oct 2, 23 @ 12:39 pm
Mortgages are registered with the county. That data is publicly available (and why you get letters from mortgage brokers when you buy a home).
Discuss.
Comment by Jerry Monday, Oct 2, 23 @ 12:42 pm
How would a state’s attorney, prosecuting
person who is accused of a gun crime with a registered gun get around the 5th amendment during a trial?
Comment by Fivegreenleaves Monday, Oct 2, 23 @ 12:43 pm
I’m kind of Curious how much traffic this site will get. Personally I’m waiting til Xmas and would wait til New Years eve except like most computer programs run by IL Gov’t I’m going to assume it’s clunky and prone to failure. On top of that I’m not sure how you register caliber on a multi caliber weapon. I.e. I have 1 lower (the “gun” part) with 3 different upper receivers to use for different game including deer here in IL. Going to make tge affidavit interesting.
Comment by Mason born Monday, Oct 2, 23 @ 12:49 pm
=Registration is a prelude to confiscation. Discuss.=
Said chicken little since forever.
=Being forced to disclose one’s (now) illegal firearms is an affront to the 2nd and 5th amendments to the US Constitution. Discuss.=
You are required not forced. I take it you are not a constitutional originalist?
=privacy-minded legal owners of modern sporting rifles ( this is the accurate industry definition BTW)=
So you were anointed to determine definitions? I think not. The proper term, going back to the first one ever made (sturmgewehr) is assault rifle. Don’t believe me? Go read a history book. The germans ruled by hitler invented it. Yeah, give that a think.
=More laws that only the law-abiding will acknowledge, only caters to those that think commotion equals progress.=
Murderers, rapists, thieves, carjackers, drug dealers and criminals in general ALL ignore the law. So we shouldn’t have those laws either?
The difference in a civil society is that the overwhelming majority of us follow the laws.
Comment by JS Mill Monday, Oct 2, 23 @ 1:02 pm
- DTownResident - Monday, Oct 2, 23 @ 12:36 pm:
So if this is all things that only punish law abiding citizens….why did the number of mass shootings decrease in this country the last time we had a ban…it should not have had any impact. Right? Discuss.
Stats show the ban had no effect. Columbine happened after the ban was in force and they didn’t even use the scary black rifle.
Comment by lowdrag Monday, Oct 2, 23 @ 1:08 pm
“Additionally, the private data from those registries has been leaked … .”
Those leaks pale in comparison to what is obtained from hacking the NRA, ISRA, any organization connected to Todd …
Comment by Anyone Remember Monday, Oct 2, 23 @ 1:27 pm
==More laws that only the law-abiding will acknowledge==
This continues to be one of the dumbest arguments that can ever be made when talking about laws. Because what you are saying is that we shouldn’t have any laws because some people might break them. Absolutely dumb.
Comment by Demoralized Monday, Oct 2, 23 @ 1:33 pm
Lots of gun-nuts and gun-grabbers commenting on this blog. A lot of you are drinking too much Kool-Aid straight from the pitcher; both on the right and on the left. Stop bullying each other and stop playing Calvin-ball. Just let the courts sort it out. If you don’t want to register and Y2K24 is approaching, go rent a storage unit across the border in a neighboring state. If the courts rule in favor of us gun-nuts, we can all party it up like Yosemite Sam. If the courts rule against us and the dooms-day apocalypse zombie nightmare scenario happens, it’s a short Sunday drive across the border to get our defense sticks. Yee haw!
Comment by lloyd Monday, Oct 2, 23 @ 1:48 pm
Read recently that New York State compliance with a similar rifle law is estimated to be below 20%. They arrived at that by comparing the number of sales over, I think, the previous decade versus the number of firearms that actually got registered after the law passed. (I’m kind of curious how they acquired the sakes data they used for comparison.) The compliance percentage could well be lower since it only went back x number of years of sales data.
Also read in the last day or two where a judge in California overturned CA’s high capacity magazine ban. Of course CA is appealing.
This entire set of provisions in the recent IL law is potentially still in flux from all the various contradictory rulings and pending appeals. You have county judges, state judges, and federal appeals court judges coming down all over the landscape. It’s not going to get more or less settled til SCOTUS sorts it out, and maybe not even then. At least it does look like SCOTUS is likely going to address a firearms case or two this session, but we likely won’t have a ruling before the end of the Illinois grace period.
Comment by RNUG Monday, Oct 2, 23 @ 4:25 pm
==This continues to be one of the dumbest arguments that can ever be made when talking about laws. Because what you are saying is that we shouldn’t have any laws because some people might break them. Absolutely dumb.==
I don’t think the argument here is we shouldn’t have laws, it is we shouldn’t have laws that have no benefit to society. We decriminalized marijuana because the law caused more harm than good, I think most on the right feel the registration criminalizes something with no real benefit to society.
Comment by maybe Monday, Oct 2, 23 @ 5:30 pm
Marijuana was decriminalized because it is on par with other legal drugs like alcohol.
Gun control isn’t about criminalizing something harmless. It is about taking military weapons off the street moving forward. Ask yourself this- 300 million guns on the street, are we safer?
I have my CCL, many guns, avid hunter. I also support assault weapons restrictions. Had the ilgop engaged maybe we would have had a better law. They chose not to.
Comment by JS Mill Monday, Oct 2, 23 @ 7:35 pm
==Gun control isn’t about criminalizing something harmless. It is about taking military weapons off the street moving forward.==
The registration is not taking weapons off the streets, it serves as an avenue for people to continue to keep weapons so its counter to gun control.
Comment by maybe Monday, Oct 2, 23 @ 7:56 pm
==Registration is a prelude to confiscation. Discuss.=
Said chicken little since forever.=
Wasn’t it a year ago that the governor of CT tried to repeal the grandfather clause in his state’s AWB? At the time, he didn’t have support from the legislature, but he said, “If I don’t try, who will?” And we saw the governor of NM try to suspend open carry even for permit holders by declaring a health emergency. So, the sky might not be falling (yet), but there are some that are looking up at it to find the weak spots.
Comment by CJA Monday, Oct 2, 23 @ 9:01 pm
I registered. Took less than 5 minutes. Moving on.
Comment by ChuckIL Tuesday, Oct 3, 23 @ 5:23 am
=Ask yourself this- 300 million guns on the street, are we safer?=
Safer than what?
Safer than 95% of countries in the world? yes, we are.
Comment by Anon123 Tuesday, Oct 3, 23 @ 10:49 am
===Safer than 95% of countries in the world? yes, we are.===
… and yet the same folks will tell you that Chicago is one of the most dangerous places on earth?
How many mass shootings are occurring in other countries?
Safer is arbitrary to how one wants their guns regulated.
Comment by Oswego Willy Tuesday, Oct 3, 23 @ 10:53 am
===Safer than 95% of countries in the world? yes, we are.===
Gotta link for that?
Comment by Rich Miller Tuesday, Oct 3, 23 @ 10:58 am