Capitol Fax.com - Your Illinois News Radar


Latest Post | Last 10 Posts | Archives


Previous Post: ‘The votes are not there’
Next Post: Harmon files amendment to elect all Chicago school board members next year

Afternoon roundup

Posted in:

* The Illinois House has adjourned until tomorrow. But the majority Democrats did release their own elected Chicago school board plan

The proposal is here. This bill avoids the Senate plan’s issue of disenfranchising half the city for two years. But now we have two competing measures and veto session ends in two days.

* Capitol News Illinois

Gun rights advocacy groups say they intend to ask the U.S. Supreme Court to review the state’s assault weapons ban after a federal appeals court on Friday refused to block enforcement of the law.

In a statement Saturday, the Illinois State Rifle Association said it was not surprised by the 7th Circuit panel’s 2-1 decision, which said plaintiffs in the consolidated cases had not met their burden to show they were likely to win in a constitutional challenge to the law.

“It has always been and is our intent to take our case to the U.S. Supreme Court where we believe we can get a favorable ruling for law-abiding gun owners in Illinois,” the organization said. “We will continue to stand up for the Second amendment and Illinois law-abiding gun owners and against our anti-gun Governor Pritzker and General Assembly.”

In addition, the National Foundation for Gun Rights – which provided attorneys involved in the consolidated case – said it will appeal as well.

* Center Square

The four former Commonwealth Edison leaders convicted earlier this year during a high-profile corruption trial want to push back sentencing dates to give them more time to address anticipated disputes.

The four former ComEd executives and lobbyists were convicted in May of a bribery scandal centered around former Illinois House Speaker Michael Madigan.

Defense attorneys want to push back the sentencing dates from January 2024 to February 2024, according to court records.

* Ironically enough, neither this lobbyist nor this lobbying firm are registered with the state this year. Forest Park Review

Lobbyist Michael Axelrod of consulting group GPG Strategies appears to have strategized with Mayor Rory Hoskins in defense of GPG’s record ahead of an August meeting during which the company’s contract was expected to come under fire, an email to the mayor shows. […]

Both the body of the email and the presentation offered examples to show that Axelrod’s firm lobbied the Chicago Transit Authority, Gov. J.B. Pritzker’s Office and other state and federal agencies on behalf of the village.

* I saw photos online of a bunch of people who took campaign money from Paul Vallas and/or Dan Proft in this loud crowd. But for some reason, most Chicago reporters have chosen to ignore the formerly (?) paid provocateurs disrupting city council meetings and at other migrant-related meetings around the city

Mayor Brandon Johnson’s allies tried Tuesday to approve their own, softer version of a non-binding referendum on Chicago’s burgeoning migrant crisis, but failed after being shouted down by an angry crowd ordered forcibly removed from City Council chambers.

“Sergeant-at-arms, clear the room,” Rules Committee Chair Michelle Harris (8th) shouted after Chicagoans opposed to housing the new arrivals shouted down Council members on both sides of the issue.

Several people in the gallery, including a woman in tears, were escorted out by security after another observer singled them out as supporters of welcoming migrants.

“These are the people who are against us,” a man shouted, pointing at those being escorted out and waving other angry crowd members over.

* Speaking of Chicago…

The Association of Safety-Net Community Hospitals (ASNCH) today warned the proposed Chicago Paid Leave Ordinance would pose devastating financial consequences, including layoffs and service cuts, for the city’s hospitals that serve a disproportionate number of low-income and uninsured patients.

In a letter to Mayor Johnson, ASNCH called for a carve out of safety-net hospitals from the proposed ordinance.

ASNCH estimates that for a safety-net hospital with 650 employees, this ordinance could impose an additional cost of $2 million annually, creating a substantial financial burden for hospitals already relying heavily on state Medicaid funding, with limited capacity to offset losses from commercial payers.

This added burden will force safety-net hospitals in Chicago to make difficult decisions, including reducing staff and eliminating critical services that many residents depend on for basic healthcare.

Specifically, the ordinance would require safety-net hospitals to dramatically increase labor costs and related expenses, including for outside agency staff, which already have hiked hospital labor costs by 30 percent. The measure would also require paying out sick time for “on-call” employees, who only report to work when needed, and “in-house registry” nurses, who accrue benefits with another full-time employer, meaning these employees would be provided benefits at two different organizations at the same time.

Crain’s reports the proposal was delayed today.

* Isabel’s roundup…

posted by Rich Miller
Tuesday, Nov 7, 23 @ 3:32 pm

Comments

  1. RE: Capital News Illinois Story

    It will be interesting to see how the California ban plays out in the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals. There, a U.S. District judge struck down the ban, which will be appealed now.

    Once that case is settled, along with the Illinois case, it will be interesting to see how quickly the Supreme takes up the argument about banning military grade weapons from private use.

    Comment by H-W Tuesday, Nov 7, 23 @ 3:43 pm

  2. ==reporters have chosen to ignore the formerly (?) paid provocateurs==

    And one had a largely fictitious resume when he ran for public office.

    Comment by Big Dipper Tuesday, Nov 7, 23 @ 3:44 pm

  3. The Chicago school board election plans are so unnecessarily convoluted. Simply elect members from all twenty districts, with odd numbered districts serving a two year term and even districts serving four years.

    Comment by thechampaignlife Tuesday, Nov 7, 23 @ 3:44 pm

  4. “* I saw photos online of a bunch of people who took campaign money from Paul Vallas and/or Dan Proft in this loud crowd. But for some reason, most Chicago reporters have chosen to ignore the formerly (?) paid provocateurs disrupting city council meetings and at other migrant-related meetings around the city”

    The conservatives are driving the message and no one is pushing back. The Mayor’s Office does not have a communications strategy or staff.

    Comment by NIU Grad Tuesday, Nov 7, 23 @ 4:00 pm

  5. hey Legislators re Chicago way to confuse and anger people all at once about the elected school board.

    Comment by Amalia Tuesday, Nov 7, 23 @ 4:16 pm

  6. Vallas lost because he was too conservative, and his strategic plan is to win in 2027 after working for IPI?

    Comment by Three Dimensional Checkers Tuesday, Nov 7, 23 @ 6:30 pm

  7. Mayor Richard J. Daley used to have a regular “ruly” crowd come in if there was going to be a contentious council meeting. If the Mayor’s Office has no strategy maybe that crowd should be resurrected when the paid provocateurs show up.

    Comment by West Side the Best Side Tuesday, Nov 7, 23 @ 6:39 pm

  8. =Vallas lost because he was too conservative=

    I’d argue he lost because he was too Paul Vallas. A guy who’s in it for himself and will continually reinvent himself to serve his own interests. The next iteration of Paul Vallas will look different than the last. But it will be just as phony.

    Comment by Pundent Tuesday, Nov 7, 23 @ 7:15 pm

  9. Saw Chima in one background shot, I wonder if he’s still spreading around Vallas money.

    Comment by Chito Tuesday, Nov 7, 23 @ 7:21 pm

  10. Rich - Just noticed, you’re still hanging on to Daylight Savings Time on the posts. Thought the Mighty Electronic Device Wizards controlled that stuff.

    Comment by West Side the Best Side Tuesday, Nov 7, 23 @ 7:31 pm

  11. >>>>>it will be interesting to see how quickly the Supreme takes up the argument about banning military grade weapons from private use.

    It already did, 85 years ago. US v Miller. “In the absence of any evidence tending to show that possession or use of a “shotgun having a barrel of less than eighteen inches in length” at this time has some reasonable relationship to the preservation or efficiency of a well regulated militia, we cannot say that the Second Amendment guarantees the right to keep and bear such an instrument.”

    Comment by We've never had one before Wednesday, Nov 8, 23 @ 1:50 am

  12. The text of the House Amendment and this graphic seem to tell different stories. The House Amendment prevents anyone who lives in the same subdistrict as an appointed member from running for the Chicago Board of Education. This will limit ballot access for half the subdistricts.

    This graphic seems to indicate that the Mayor will appoint a member from a subdistrict where no candidate has been elected, and vice versa. I find both the text of the graphic and the amendment to be very confusing. This confusion does not exist in the original law.

    Comment by Valerie F. Leonard Tuesday, Nov 14, 23 @ 12:56 am

Add a comment

Sorry, comments are closed at this time.

Previous Post: ‘The votes are not there’
Next Post: Harmon files amendment to elect all Chicago school board members next year


Last 10 posts:

more Posts (Archives)

WordPress Mobile Edition available at alexking.org.

powered by WordPress.